SCIENCE REPLACES PHILOSOPHY
Existence (need for action)
Aesthetics (the sciences of experiences / experience / spirituality)
Testimony (the sciences of truth telling / knowledge / psychology)
Law (the sciences of cooperation / each other / sociology)
Engineering (the hard sciences / the universe / physics)
PHILOSOPHY IS COMPLETE
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-22 08:25:00 UTC
The tactic is simple.
What are they trying to acquire ?
How are they trying to get a discount?
Why are they avoiding an exchange instead of engaging in Fraud?
What would our team trade them in exchange for what they want?
Prosecute them for their lying and theft.
Put them on the defensive.
This is what I do.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-18 17:12:00 UTC
Sacred commons. Universal service (militia). Universal standing. The Oath (tell the truth, never steal). Jury. Sovereignty.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-13 13:48:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/709013214781153280
Reply addressees: @charlesmurray
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/709007640676929536
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@charlesmurray Rule of law. Family as the unit of political decision making, production, and reproduction. Civic (participatory) Society.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/709007640676929536
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@charlesmurray Rule of law. Family as the unit of political decision making, production, and reproduction. Civic (participatory) Society.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/709007640676929536
Rule of law. Family as the unit of political decision making, production, and reproduction. Civic (participatory) Society.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-13 13:26:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/709007640676929536
Reply addressees: @charlesmurray
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/709005349098016768
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@charlesmurray Let’s define those values, rather than refer to them by SUGGESTION. Pietka is not advocating American but Neocon values.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/709005349098016768
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@charlesmurray Let’s define those values, rather than refer to them by SUGGESTION. Pietka is not advocating American but Neocon values.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/709005349098016768
American Values?
Let’s define those values, rather than refer to them by SUGGESTION.
Family as the unit of political decision making, production, and reproduction. Civic (participatory) Society.
Sacred commons. Universal service (militia). Universal standing. The Oath (tell the truth, never steal). Jury. Sovereignty. Rule of law. (Universal application)
VALUES” refers to experiences. INSTITUTIONS AND PROCESSES exist, function, and create our values. Not the other way around.
Values provide us with experiences created by our institutions.
Change the institutions, change the values.
That is what women and the left have done.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-13 09:53:00 UTC
1) Ideas required of Philosophers, Prophets and Kings. 2) Strategy required of Leaders. 3) Plans required of Organizers. 4) Belief is required of Followers. —“Your list is complete, because the reverse is true.. If you have ideas, you become a philosopher If you have a strategy, you become a leader If you produce plans, you become an organiser. If you have belief/faith in others you can be a follower… There is nothing stopping one from being all these things at once… If I have belief and can create ideas, plans and strategies, I make a good soldier for any organisation.” —Tobias Darby
1) Ideas required of Philosophers, Prophets and Kings. 2) Strategy required of Leaders. 3) Plans required of Organizers. 4) Belief is required of Followers. —“Your list is complete, because the reverse is true.. If you have ideas, you become a philosopher If you have a strategy, you become a leader If you produce plans, you become an organiser. If you have belief/faith in others you can be a follower… There is nothing stopping one from being all these things at once… If I have belief and can create ideas, plans and strategies, I make a good soldier for any organisation.” —Tobias Darby
LOVE IN TEN QUESTIONS
We are physically attracted to one another?
We feel the desire to nurture and protect one another?
We emotionally intuit one another?
We share each others ethics and morals?
We like to talk to each other?
We like to do things – almost anything – together?
We do not like to be apart from one another?
We tolerate each other’s … habits and failings?
We easily compromise (sacrifice) for the happiness the other? (Trust)
We find strategic value (security / prosperity) in living together?
Then we can make the commitment to work to stay together.
Source date (UTC): 2016-02-22 03:22:00 UTC
If you simply look at this single set:
{
Existence (action)
Biology (physical limits)
Psychology (mental limits)
Testimony (truth limits and the logics and instruments )
Ethics (cooperation)
Family (reproduction)
Sociology (norms)
Law(dispute resolution)
Politics (commons production)
Group Evolutionary Strategy (competition)
War (conflict/dispute resolution)
Technology (recipes)
Education (training)
Aesthetics (art)
}
How is that different from the the following sets?
{Psychology and Sociology}
{Economics and Politics}
{Religion, Philosophy, and Morality}
{Law and Legislation}
{Strategy and Logistics}
{History and Literature}
{Science and Engineering}
And how is that different from this set?
{
Metaphysics
Epistemology
Ethics
Politics
Aesthetics
}
It’s very different different world when everything is fully integrated into a single hierarchical theory of knowledge: it’s far harder to error or lie.
Source date (UTC): 2016-02-16 11:47:00 UTC
Need to:
1 – Make every university educator in the soft disciplines sign a warranty of restitution.
2 – Hand control of all but physical plant to professors.
3 – Separate teaching from researching P&L’s entirely.
4 – Fund education as a payroll deduction from future earnings, against credit given by the treasury.
Eliminate the moral hazard. Rig the incentives.
I am also open to treating all arts and letters as recreational rather than professional training, and not covered by education credit.
(Spoken as someone with a fine art and art history education who values it as priceless.)
Source date (UTC): 2016-02-15 11:20:00 UTC