THE GRAND SEQUENCE
Truth, Manners, Ethics, Morals, Liberty, Aristocracy, Beauty
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-12 07:30:00 UTC
THE GRAND SEQUENCE
Truth, Manners, Ethics, Morals, Liberty, Aristocracy, Beauty
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-12 07:30:00 UTC
scary thought…
Testimony:
Identity (Categorically consistent)
Internally (Logically) consistent
Externally Correspondent (Empirically Consistent)
Existentially Possible
Parsimonious (fully accounted, parsimonious, limits)
Moral (productive, fully informed, warrantied voluntary transfers)
Beautiful (craft, aesthetic, moral, resources)
That would mean that truth, science, philosophy, law, aesthetics were identical.
TRUTH GOODNESS(MORAL) AND BEAUTY = SCIENCE
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-12 06:14:00 UTC
SOCIAL SCIENCE: Natural Law, Monarchy, Regional Nobility, Market Commons, Family, Nationalism.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-12 04:28:00 UTC
De Lege Naturae / The Law of Nature
Artem Testimonium / The Science of Testimony
De Philosophia Aristocratia / The Philosophy of Aristocracy
De Nobilitate et Scriptura / The Scripture of Nobility
De Professio Regum / The Art of Kings
Viridis Bibliis Arianorum / The Green Arian Bible
Monotheism was invented to divide us.
The Talmud to steal.
The Bible to enslave.
The Koran to conquer.
The Truth to make us free.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-09 01:52:00 UTC
[W]E ARE COMPETITORS NOT ALLIES, NOT FRIENDS, NOT KIN 1) we are competitors not allies. We cooperate economically for mutual gain. But if cooperation requires that we sacrifice to increase the numbers of our competitors then this is not beneficial but parasitic and suicidal. 2) you do not understand economics. To move every human in a network requires the application of marginal differences in incentives. This requires vast capital. It is through vast capital applied as incentives that we produce the voluntary organization of production.
[W]E ARE COMPETITORS NOT ALLIES, NOT FRIENDS, NOT KIN 1) we are competitors not allies. We cooperate economically for mutual gain. But if cooperation requires that we sacrifice to increase the numbers of our competitors then this is not beneficial but parasitic and suicidal. 2) you do not understand economics. To move every human in a network requires the application of marginal differences in incentives. This requires vast capital. It is through vast capital applied as incentives that we produce the voluntary organization of production.
Western man requires: Moral Incentive (our genocide). An Institutional Solution. A Plan of Transition. A Plan of action (revolution).
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-01 05:36:00 UTC
METHODS OF COMMUNICATION
Law(cooperation), Laws
Aesthetics(pleasure), Experiences
Literature(conflation), Analogies
Science (deflation). Names.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-24 02:03:00 UTC
Testimony vs Literature
Truth vs Experience
Criticism vs Free Association
Survival vs Creativity
Deflationary vs Conflationary
Clarify vs Obscure
Persuasion vs Suggestion
Decidability vs Opportunity
Decrease Cost vs Increase Cost
Save vs Spend
Action vs Consumption
Production vs Entertainment
Science vs Art
What is the difference between an action novel and a philosophical treatise? You are carried into the plot, vs the plot is carried into you.
But they are both literature.
That is all.
A recipe is different from a work of literature.
Science(Testimony) consists of the methods by which we create recipes and name them. Literature the methods by which we create experiences.
Communication, like violence, is a resource put to good or ill.
Whether we create fully informed, productive, warrantied voluntary exchanges free of externalities – meaning moral communication – or whether we create suggestion, unproductive or harmful, unwarranted, involuntary transfers full of externalities – meaning immoral communication.
And the fact remains that it is very difficult to communicate immorally with recipes, it is very easy to communicate immorally with literature.
Yet given that experience is our native language – one which evolved prior to reason – pedagogy is often best performed with loaded, framed, and repeated (overloaded) analogy.
There is a place for truth.
There is a place for pedagogy.
There is a place for creativity
The question we must ask of some philosophers is whether there is a place for immoral suggestion rather than moral communication.
And whether they transfer by moral or immoral means, immoral or moral ends.
The philosophy of the west is natural law, common law, testimony, jury, universal standing and rule of law (universal applicability). Science is the art of improving one’s testimony.
Everything else is merely literature.
The question is whether that literature conveys moral or immoral content, and does so morally or immorally.
And from that perspective, philosophers have a very checkered past.
Curt Doolittle
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-24 01:13:00 UTC
Federalize all increases in University Endowments back to 1963.
😉
Student loans from the treasury directly, but paid out of payroll deductions.
😉
All teachers in the school system must have completed a career of no less than twenty five years in a for-profit field, and all tenure revoked.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-22 08:49:00 UTC