Form: Outline

  • ITS NOT COMPLICATED – WE JUST GOT IT WRONG User Experience Patterns System Archi

    ITS NOT COMPLICATED – WE JUST GOT IT WRONG

    User Experience Patterns

    System Architecture Design Patterns

    Application Architecture Design Patterns

    Data Structures

    Operations

    Syntax <– This is the only thing that differs.

    And why?

    Becuase we developed Fortran/C & Numbers instead of Lisp & Logic. People thought that they were smarter than Turing.

    Everyone makes new languages for the same reason, and none of them make any difference. Why?

    We used numbers and not logic.

    It’s like being stuck in the USA with 110v when the rest of the world runs on 120.

    The damned bad decision sticks with you FOREVER.

    I’ve gone through the lifecycle myself. and you know, we spend a lot of time trying to be smart without understanding that our foundations are stupid. WE’re solving the wrong problem.

    programming is analogous to teaching not engineering.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-09 06:56:00 UTC

  • THEY HIERARCHY OF TRUTH PROPOSITIONS —Observations vs Operations vs Explanatio

    THEY HIERARCHY OF TRUTH PROPOSITIONS

    —Observations vs Operations vs Explanations—

    1) OBSERVATION, hypothesis, tested, theory, tested exhaustively, “Fact.”

    2) OPERATIONS, hypothesis, tested, theory, tested exhaustively”, “Recipe”

    3) EXPLANATION, hypothesis, tested, theory, tested exhaustively, “Law”

    (an apriori statement is a special case of explanation whereby the statement of hypothesis can be true and cannot be false.)

    Observation: reporting of facts

    Operations: production of processes.

    Explanations: describing causal relations

    That’s probably the epistemological state of the art in a nutshell.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-01 01:28:00 UTC

  • LEVELS OF EDUCATION CALCULATION (PREDICTION) 140 Physics and Econometrics (appli

    LEVELS OF EDUCATION

    CALCULATION (PREDICTION) 140

    Physics and Econometrics (applied mathematics) (ORGANIZATION OF ENTROPY)

    BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING (ORGANIZATION OF GROWTH) 130

    Chemistry, Biology, Medicine,

    ENGINEERING (CONSTRUCTION) 120

    computer science (language), electronic engineering ( fields ), mechanical engineering (power), public engineering (mass, scale and distance), structural engineering (forces of nature)

    COMPUTATION (MEASUREMENT) 110

    Law, Finance, Accounting,

    ORGANIZATION OF PRODUCTION (ORGANIZATION) 105

    Business and Marketing

    Criminal Justice

    Primary Education.

    TRADES

    (best learned by doing)

    ORGANIZATION OF REPRODUCTION (PARENTING)

    (best learned by doing)


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-26 04:24:00 UTC

  • SEQUENCE: 1 – COMPUTABLE (DETERMINISTIC), 2 – CALCULABLE (NON-COMPUTABLE/DEDUCTI

    SEQUENCE:

    1 – COMPUTABLE (DETERMINISTIC),

    2 – CALCULABLE (NON-COMPUTABLE/DEDUCTIVE/LOGICAL),

    3 – RATIONAL (INDUCTIVE/NON-CONTRADICTORY),

    4 – IMAGINABLE (ABDUCTIVE/VAGUELY ASSOCIABLE).

    5 – IRRATIONAL (UNIMAGINABLE / INASSOCIABLE )


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-23 01:04:00 UTC

  • ARISTOCRATIC EGALITARIANISM’S ADAPTATION TO PEACE AND WAR (important for new rig

    ARISTOCRATIC EGALITARIANISM’S ADAPTATION TO PEACE AND WAR

    (important for new right and alt-right)

    PEACE (disperse efforts – exchange and production )

    – Liberty (rule of law, natural law, universal standing and application)

    – Universalism

    – Marke Competition: Competition (reproduction, production), Commons Production (monopoly or market)

    – Insurance: Militia, Emergency Services, Hospital (care)

    – Voluntary organization of most.

    —VERSUS—

    WAR (concentrate efforts – force and destruction )

    – Illiberty (command)

    – Nationalism (genetic and cultural warfare)

    – Fascism ( economic, and legal warfare)

    – War (physical warfare)

    – Involuntary organization of most.

    THERE ARE NO STEADY STATES – We “FLEX” between liberty and fascism because we shift between peace and war.

    (Recent related posts on the temporary utility of Fascism as an extension of warfare into economic activity)

    WHAT DOES FASCISM MEAN?

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10154357209457264

    FASCISM’S PLACE IN THE GREAT GAME OF ROCK-PAPER-SCISSORS

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10154366459612264


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-22 02:58:00 UTC

  • THE REVOLUTION IS HERE Metaphysics of Correspondence with Action – Realism, Natu

    THE REVOLUTION IS HERE

    Metaphysics of Correspondence with Action – Realism, Naturalism, Complete Scientific Realism (Testimonial Realism), Defeating the Red Queen.

    Testimonial Truth – Complete Warranty of Due Diligence

    Propertarianism – Ethics of Property in Toto: non-imposition of costs.

    Nomocracy – Rule of Law, Universal Standing, Universal Application

    Market Government – Post Monopoly Production of Commons, Market for Production, Market for Reproduction,

    Transcendent Aesthetics – Bounty: the True, the Excellent, The Beautiful, The Transcendent


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-21 02:31:00 UTC

  • Those who fight Those who judge Those who choose (risk) Those who discover (rese

    Those who fight

    Those who judge

    Those who choose (risk)

    Those who discover (research)

    Those who organize ( manage )

    Those who produce

    Those who reproduce

    Those who care

    Those who are unable

    Those who are criminal

    Those who betray.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-09 10:06:00 UTC

  • DECIDABILITY VS CHOICE VS PUBLIC CHOICE 1 – How do you solve the problem of deci

    DECIDABILITY VS CHOICE VS PUBLIC CHOICE

    1 – How do you solve the problem of decidability? (a single logical decision) (logic)

    2 – How do you solve the problem of choice? (multiple coincident decisions) (preference)

    3 – How do you solve the problem of public choice? (aggregates of choices) (market)

    How much information is in each of those questions, and how does it differ?


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-07 12:32:00 UTC

  • Forms of argument evolve just like mathematics did: adding layers of precision M

    Forms of argument evolve just like mathematics did: adding layers of precision

    Myth (narrative analogy)

    Internally consistent myth ( religion )

    Reason ( possibility )

    Rationalism. ( justificationism )

    Analytic rationalism. ( Consistency )

    Existential criticism ( Operationalism)

    You see. In hindsight it’s obvious.

    It wasn’t though 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-05 15:37:00 UTC

  • TEN THOUGHTS ON MONEY Q&A: –“Curt, have you written much on money?”– I’ve writ

    TEN THOUGHTS ON MONEY

    Q&A: –“Curt, have you written much on money?”–

    I’ve written a bit , here and there, mostly on:

    1) the fact that fiat money is equal to shares in the state/economy, not notes or money. Moreover, I’ve tried to impress upon people that colloquial money (various mediums of exchange in sufficient volume to produce market price signals) and all its forms, differ substantially from money proper. And I’ve tried to correct mises and the bitcoin community on their uses of these terms – because it’s fraudulent to compare these media as having the same properties. They don’t’.

    2) it’s not clear that people have any right to the appreciation of fiat money, nor whether they have a right to its store of value for any extended period of time (longer than a business cycle).

    3) We should use multiple currencies for multiple purposes so that rates of inflationary dilution are purpose-specific.

    4) There is no need to continue distribution of liquidity through the banking system as we did when there was hard currency. We can directly issue liquidity to consumers and cause spending without giving profits or power to the banking and finance system. This forces business and industry to fight for consumers, rather than fight for access to credit.

    5) Money is information and the more kinds of money the more kinds of information we have that is less subject to distortion. I could write a book on this subject alone.

    6) In theory money is neutral, in practice it is not. Not because prices are not eventually equilibrated, but because this process of equilibration works through the economy disruptively and without uniformity.

    7) Lending should be regulated to the same degree as law, and debt should not be resellable because a price (value) is subjectively constructed and non-transferrable, and non-insurable.

    8 ) Law has been abused to work in the favor of hazard-creation by lenders, and this should be inverted, and bankruptcy protection increased so that lenders have an extremely difficult time collecting and instead take fewer risks and take less responsibility for distributing liquidity.

    9) intergenerational redistribution must be stopped, and the singaporean model adopted so that the future is calculable. Furthermore, this money cannot be touched by creditors or the state, or anyone else for that matter.

    10 ) I would prefer that the government collected fees on all financial transactions rather than income taxes. I believe fees are necessary for the production of insurance of last resort, and those discretionary commons that make us competitive.

    Those are the major topics.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-02 03:28:00 UTC