1) SOVEREIGNTY (leads to)
2) MARKETS IN EVERYTHING, (leads to)
3) DEFLATIONARY/DECONFLATIONARY, (leads to)
4) REASON, RATIONALISM, EMPIRICISM, TESTIMONIALISM (leads to)
5) TRUTH: PERFECT PARSIMONY (leads to)
6) TRANSCENDENCE.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-15 08:55:00 UTC
0) THE BIRTH OF THE WEST: SOVEREIGNTY.
COUNTER-REVOLUTIONS
1) RELIGION: THE FIRST INFANTILIZATION OF THE INDO-EUROPEANS.
(corrected with aristotelian reason, stoic and roman law)
2) CHRISTIANITY: THE FIRST INFANTILIZATION OF THE WESTERN INDO-EUROPEANS
(corrected with empiricism, and anglo common law)
3) COSMOPOLITANISM: THE SECOND INFANTILIZATION OF THE WEST. AND THE NEW WEST.
(corrected with testimonialism, and propertarian natural law)
WHY IS IT WE MUST DE-INFANTILIZE MAN IN EVERY GREAT ERA?
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-15 08:51:00 UTC
[No text content]
[No text content]
CIRCUMPOLAR CIVILIZATION ‘CHRISTENDOM’
1) anglo ,empirical, common law, christian, utopian trust,
2) continental, rational, napoleonic, protestant, high trust
3) mediterranean, traditional, napoleonic, catholic low trust
4) eastern, traditional, moral, catholic, low trust
5) russian, tradictional, soviet law, orthodox, lowest trust
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-12 00:58:00 UTC
THE ASSEMBLY LINE OF FRAUD
The Marxists Manufacturing Pseudoscience.
… The Frankfurt School manufacturing Propaganda;
… … The Academy Selling Diplomas as Class Indulgences;
… … … Mass Market Consumer Media selling Advertising;
… … … … The Majoritarian Democratic State selling Rents:
… … … … … Emancipated but Unregulated Women’s Urges;
… … … … … … The Assembly Line of Pseudoscientific Fraud.
(h/t:Rakesh Sahgal, for the inspiration)
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-09 11:53:00 UTC
MAKE DISTRIBUTION OF PSEUDOSCIENCE ILLEGAL
1) Defund and deny loans to universities, colleges, or schools that teach Critical Theory, Marxism, or their derivatives, as a pseudoscientific religion. (Put left universities out of business)
2) Require warranty of truthfulness, and warranty of due diligence, and warranty that one’s speech is not a hazard to voluntary exchange when speaking into the informational commons. (put the news industry out of business)
3) Grant universal standing under the same criteria as to racketeering to the public in matters of defense of the informational commons
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-09 10:38:00 UTC
THE FOUR GENERATIONS OF WARFARE
1GW: First-generation warfare refers to Ancient and Post-classical battles fought with massed manpower, using line and column tactics with uniformed soldiers governed by the state.
2GW: Second-generation warfare is the Early modern tactics used after the invention of the rifled musket and breech-loading weapons and continuing through the development of the machine gun and indirect fire. The term second generation warfare was created by the U.S. military in 1989.
3GW – Third-generation warfare focuses on using Late modern technology-derived tactics of leveraging speed, stealth and surprise to bypass the enemy’s lines and collapse their forces from the rear. Essentially, this was the end of linear warfare on a tactical level, with units seeking not simply to meet each other face to face but to outmaneuver each other to gain the greatest advantage.
4GW – Fourth-generation warfare as presented by Lind et al. is characterized by “Post-modern” a return to decentralized forms of warfare, blurring of the lines between war and politics, combatants and civilians due to nation states’ loss of their near-monopoly on combat forces, returning to modes of conflict common in pre-modern times. (I See 4GW as a return to normalcy prior to 2GW).
~5GW – We ‘hypothesize’ this is robotic warfare where more advanced societies protect themselves by expensive mechanical means.
~6GW – We ‘hypothesize’ this is artificial intelligence warfare, under the “Collossus” rule: that politics have been removed from the decision criteria and our defense is effectively in the hands of a computerized ‘god’. So that humans are no longer accountable for retaliation. (The Russians are halfway there already)
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-04 23:21:00 UTC
IN PROPERTARIANISM WE ARGUE PROSECUTORILY
– You can argue to obtain approval: Satisfaction: Empathy.
– You can argue to obtain consent: Negotiation: Utility.
– You can argue for moral demand or outrage: Moralism: Reason
– You can argue to identify truth or falsehood: Philosophy: Rationalism
– You can argue to identify correspondence: Science: Empiricism.
– You can argue to identify exchange or theft: Prosecution: Testimonialism.
You see, that’s what they don’t understand. The entire western argumentative edifice is built upon the ancient assumption of the search for consent and moral persuasion, in favor of a common good – and only in rare occasions do we depend upon science since our questions are never scientific but only of cooperation or non.
But these are all JUSTIFICATIONARY arguments.
If instead, we are not trying to obtain consensus or consent, we are trying to determine whether or not to use violence to resist, punish, subjugate, enslave, or kill you, then your only option is to preserve our sovereignty, by boycotting us or trading with us under productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer limited to productive externality.
There is no need to treat the weak and parasitic as equals. They are either useful and productive or they are parasitic and harmful.
We just need to kill enough of them that our words ring true.
Violence used to Create Sovereignty is the Highest Virtue. Because it is from Sovereignty that Liberty, freedom, and subsidy are made possible for all. And contributions to the commons by the prohibition on their consumption, is the moral method by which we transcend this world, just by the prohibition on parasitism on pain of death is the moral method by which we transcend man.
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-04 13:48:00 UTC
CLASS HIERARCHY IN WESTERN POLYTHEISM
1 – WARFARE – limitation on external change to the status quo (highly intolerant of error) an authoritarian organization of mandatory allies against other organizations of allies.
2 – NATURAL COMMON LAW – limitation on internal change in the status quo (social science) (intolerant of error) and taking advantage of institutional allies.
3 – PHYSICAL SCIENCE – Upper Middle-class investigation of truth for use in changing the status quo (pragmatic with error) and authoritative accumulation of allies.
4 – ECONOMIC SCIENCE – Middle class (partly) pseudoscience, (partly) science, and (partly) philosophy for use in changing the status quo – arguably for the worse.
5 – PHILOSOPHY – Middle-Class Appeal for change or affirmation of the status quo. (largely error, signaling, and deceit – persuasive accumulation of allies)
6 – LITERATURE – Clerical Class visions of alternatives to the status quo (conciliatory romantic appeal to allies)
7 – PSEUDOSCIENCE-PSEUDORATIONALISM – working class rebellion against the status quo – seeking other similar allies.
8 – RELIGION – underclass escape from the material status quo by alliance with those below it.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-04 08:31:00 UTC