IN PROPERTARIANISM WE ARGUE PROSECUTORILY – You can argue to obtain approval: Sa

IN PROPERTARIANISM WE ARGUE PROSECUTORILY

– You can argue to obtain approval: Satisfaction: Empathy.

– You can argue to obtain consent: Negotiation: Utility.

– You can argue for moral demand or outrage: Moralism: Reason

– You can argue to identify truth or falsehood: Philosophy: Rationalism

– You can argue to identify correspondence: Science: Empiricism.

– You can argue to identify exchange or theft: Prosecution: Testimonialism.

You see, that’s what they don’t understand. The entire western argumentative edifice is built upon the ancient assumption of the search for consent and moral persuasion, in favor of a common good – and only in rare occasions do we depend upon science since our questions are never scientific but only of cooperation or non.

But these are all JUSTIFICATIONARY arguments.

If instead, we are not trying to obtain consensus or consent, we are trying to determine whether or not to use violence to resist, punish, subjugate, enslave, or kill you, then your only option is to preserve our sovereignty, by boycotting us or trading with us under productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer limited to productive externality.

There is no need to treat the weak and parasitic as equals. They are either useful and productive or they are parasitic and harmful.

We just need to kill enough of them that our words ring true.

Violence used to Create Sovereignty is the Highest Virtue. Because it is from Sovereignty that Liberty, freedom, and subsidy are made possible for all. And contributions to the commons by the prohibition on their consumption, is the moral method by which we transcend this world, just by the prohibition on parasitism on pain of death is the moral method by which we transcend man.

Curt Doolittle

The Propertarian Institute

Kiev, Ukraine.