1. A conservative questions the overestimation of reason, and above all questions consensus. Conservatism is familial, stoic, pragmatic, and empirical. In other words risk averse to capital. 2. As a means of questioning, a conservative requires reciprocity (tort): american < british < anglo saxon < germanic < european < norther indo european in law. That law evolved from the oath (tell the truth, never steal, never flee, in combat). 3. A Conservative requires ‘empirical’ results – and where empirical fails, the ‘traditional’ is adequate, since traditional survived empirical tests in competition in reality. 4. A Conservative accumulates genetic, cultural, normative, institutional, physical, and territorial capital – attempting to pass on to future generations of his family, more than he himself inherited. 5. Conservatism is a eugenic group evolutionary strategy that increases accumulated capital through intergenerational transfer, using intergeneration lending, in order to produce increasingly ‘noble’ families. 6. Ergo successful individuals in the market for craftsmanship, successful purchase of the franchise through military service, successful individuals in the market for marriage and child rearing, successful individuals in the market for industry, successful families in the market for noble (intergenerational) families. 7. In other words, conservatism(aristocracy) is a eugenic group evolutionary strategy. And while bipartite manorialism was practiced from 700, and aggressive hanging of up to 1% of the population every year after 1000, and an attempt to escape church-state nobility, and create an entrepreneurial nobility (meritocracy), succeeded by 1600, there was a great reaction to the english revolution, and a greater reaction to the french revolution. Thus while Locke,smith,hume,adams, and jefferson promised an aristocracy available to everyone, Burke, after the french revolution, and germans after that, recognized that the peasantry was even worse at rule (see russia) than the nobility. The problem with today’s conservatism is that darwin and spencer were famous before the war, after the second world war, conservatism and eugenics were effectively banned from discourse, academy, and science. As such conservatives never (until perhaps 2000) restored empirical discourse to conservatism, because eugenics are antithetical to the experiment with democracy. This changed incrementally beginning in 76, through the 80s, and aggressively since 2000, and more aggressively since 2008. 1 – Soveriengty requires reciprocity 2 – Reciprocity requires rule of law (tort), jury(thang, senate, house of lords, supreme court), and an independent judiciary. 3 – Rule of law forces markets, since it incrementally suppresses each innovation in parasitism. 4 – Markets cause hierarchies, because they are necessary to voluntarily organize production. 5 – Markets are eugenic, because they are empirical means of testing industry and impulse. 6 – But they make possible liberty for those with property, freedom for those who labor, and subsidy for those who impose no costs on sovereignty, liberty, freedom, or property.** DOMESTICATION Man domesticated the human animal after he had learned to domesticate the non-human animal. And he did so by the same means. And the result in both domestication of the human and non human animal is the same: eugenics. May 28, 2018 10:37am
Form: Outline
-
1 – Austrian: Economic Rule of Law. (max calculation, incentive, capitalization)
1 – Austrian: Economic Rule of Law. (max calculation, incentive, capitalization)
2 – Chicago: Economic insurance and redistribution (min disruption of calculation, incentive, calculation)
3 – Saltwater: Economic Discretionary Rule (max consumption, decapitalization, dysgenia)
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-28 19:58:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1001190911546716162
Reply addressees: @Lord_Keynes2 @Voltaire1778__8 @Septeus7 @Slysneak @LambsRegret @GeolibGeorge @jappleby123 @Noahpinion
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1001189050710151173
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Lord_Keynes2 @Voltaire1778__8 @Septeus7 @Slysneak @LambsRegret @GeolibGeorge @jappleby123 @Noahpinion But that says nothing about the study of social science and the minimization of frictions in cooperation without violating rule of law(non discretion), natural law(reciprocity), morality(non-externalization of costs), truth(non distortion of information), meritocracy (eugenics).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1001189050710151173
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@Lord_Keynes2 @Voltaire1778__8 @Septeus7 @Slysneak @LambsRegret @GeolibGeorge @jappleby123 @Noahpinion But that says nothing about the study of social science and the minimization of frictions in cooperation without violating rule of law(non discretion), natural law(reciprocity), morality(non-externalization of costs), truth(non distortion of information), meritocracy (eugenics).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1001189050710151173
-
CONSERVATISM UNDERSTOOD 1. A conservative questions the overestimation of reason
CONSERVATISM UNDERSTOOD
1. A conservative questions the overestimation of reason, and above all questions consensus. Conservatism is familial, stoic, pragmatic, and empirical. In other words risk averse to capital.
2. As a means of questioning, a conservative requires reciprocity (tort): american < british < anglo saxon < germanic < european < norther indo european in law. That law evolved from the oath (tell the truth, never steal, never flee, in combat).
3. A Conservative requires ‘empirical’ results – and where empirical fails, the ‘traditional’ is adequate, since traditional survived empirical tests in competition in reality.
4. A Conservative accumulates genetic, cultural, normative, institutional, physical, and territorial capital – attempting to pass on to future generations of his family, more than he himself inherited.
5. Conservatism is a eugenic group evolutionary strategy that increases accumulated capital through intergenerational transfer, using intergeneration lending, in order to produce increasingly ‘noble’ families.
6. Ergo successful individuals in the market for craftsmanship, successful purchase of the franchise through military service, successful individuals in the market for marriage and child rearing, successful individuals in the market for industry, successful families in the market for noble (intergenerational) families.
7. In other words, conservatism(aristocracy) is a eugenic group evolutionary strategy. And while bipartite manorialism was practiced from 700, and aggressive hanging of up to 1% of the population every year after 1000, and an attempt to escape church-state nobility, and create an entrepreneurial nobility (meritocracy), succeeded by 1600, there was a great reaction to the english revolution, and a greater reaction to the french revolution. Thus while Locke,smith,hume,adams, and jefferson promised an aristocracy available to everyone, Burke, after the french revolution, and germans after that, recognized that the peasantry was even worse at rule (see russia) than the nobility.
The problem with today’s conservatism is that darwin and spencer were famous before the war, after the second world war, conservatism and eugenics were effectively banned from discourse, academy, and science.
As such conservatives never (until perhaps 2000) restored empirical discourse to conservatism, because eugenics are antithetical to the experiment with democracy. This changed incrementally beginning in 76, through the 80s, and aggressively since 2000, and more aggressively since 2008.
1 – Soveriengty requires reciprocity
2 – Reciprocity requires rule of law (tort), jury(thang, senate, house of lords, supreme court), and an independent judiciary.
3 – Rule of law forces markets, since it incrementally suppresses each innovation in parasitism.
4 – Markets cause hierarchies, because they are necessary to voluntarily organize production.
5 – Markets are eugenic, because they are empirical means of testing industry and impulse.
6 – But they make possible liberty for those with property, freedom for those who labor, and subsidy for those who impose no costs on sovereignty, liberty, freedom, or property.**
DOMESTICATION
Man domesticated the human animal after he had learned to domesticate the non-human animal. And he did so by the same means. And the result in both domestication of the human and non human animal is the same: eugenics.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-28 10:37:00 UTC
-
The Hierarchy of Revolutionary Arguments
Think of revolutionary arguments as a pyramid: – The theory (strategy) – The Incentives (science) of that strategy – The law (constitution) reflecting those incentives – The generational institutions (“government”) utilizing those incentives – The Intergenerational institutions (“education, religion”) retaining the strategy, incentives, law, and institutions). – The benefits for members (“rewards”) produced by those incentives, law, and institutions. – The motivations (“agitations”) that they produce by those what would obtain those benefits. – The Plan (“revolution”) that provides the opportunity for those whose motivations are sufficient to act – to do so. ||> Intellectuals > operators > citizens > agitators, revolutionaries: Arguments(solutions) for each. And let the weight of self interest drive the revolution – just like the enlightenment did and the eastern conquest of the western empire by levantine christianity did. I start at the top and work down. Most people start at the bottom and never make it past motivations. I expect others to take the ideas and communicate the benefits, inspire the motivations, and to organize the revolution according to plans that are fairly tactical. And I expect to pay a pretty high price for doing all of this work, and I”m ok with it. May 26, 2018 10:31am
-
The Hierarchy of Revolutionary Arguments
Think of revolutionary arguments as a pyramid: – The theory (strategy) – The Incentives (science) of that strategy – The law (constitution) reflecting those incentives – The generational institutions (“government”) utilizing those incentives – The Intergenerational institutions (“education, religion”) retaining the strategy, incentives, law, and institutions). – The benefits for members (“rewards”) produced by those incentives, law, and institutions. – The motivations (“agitations”) that they produce by those what would obtain those benefits. – The Plan (“revolution”) that provides the opportunity for those whose motivations are sufficient to act – to do so. ||> Intellectuals > operators > citizens > agitators, revolutionaries: Arguments(solutions) for each. And let the weight of self interest drive the revolution – just like the enlightenment did and the eastern conquest of the western empire by levantine christianity did. I start at the top and work down. Most people start at the bottom and never make it past motivations. I expect others to take the ideas and communicate the benefits, inspire the motivations, and to organize the revolution according to plans that are fairly tactical. And I expect to pay a pretty high price for doing all of this work, and I”m ok with it. May 26, 2018 10:31am
-
THE HIERARCHY OF REVOLUTIONARY ARGUMENTS Think of revolutionary arguments as a p
THE HIERARCHY OF REVOLUTIONARY ARGUMENTS
Think of revolutionary arguments as a pyramid:
– The theory (strategy)
– The Incentives (science) of that strategy
– The law (constitution) reflecting those incentives
– The generational institutions (“government”) utilizing those incentives
– The Intergenerational institutions (“education, religion”) retaining the strategy, incentives, law, and institutions).
– The benefits for members (“rewards”) produced by those incentives, law, and institutions.
– The motivations (“agitations”) that they produce by those what would obtain those benefits.
– The Plan (“revolution”) that provides the opportunity for those whose motivations are sufficient to act – to do so.
||> Intellectuals > operators > citizens > agitators, revolutionaries: Arguments(solutions) for each. And let the weight of self interest drive the revolution – just like the enlightenment did and the eastern conquest of the western empire by levantine christianity did.
I start at the top and work down. Most people start at the bottom and never make it past motivations.
I expect others to take the ideas and communicate the benefits, inspire the motivations, and to organize the revolution according to plans that are fairly tactical.
And I expect to pay a pretty high price for doing all of this work, and I”m ok with it.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-26 10:31:00 UTC
-
MORALITY IS OBJECTIVE AND THE CONSTITUTION IS CONSTRUCTED FROM IT. 1) Moral Obje
MORALITY IS OBJECTIVE AND THE CONSTITUTION IS CONSTRUCTED FROM IT.
1) Moral Objectivity = Reciprocity:Natural Law(of Tort) independent of individual or group opinion.
2) Moral Norms = Portfolios of rights and duties resulting in reciprocity within the group survival strategy.
3) Moral Bias = Expression of gender and class reproductive strategy.
The problem is that we all want to ‘lie a bit’ and promote our individual strategy over the Group’s and the Groups over Evolutionary Necessity: Mankind.
And that constitution survived until the war of northern aggression by which the industrialized north conquered the south because the west would have allied with the south and left the north a weak competitor to Europe, dominated by the agrarian aristocratic south.
The constitution was the first written attempt to formally capture The Natural Law of Reciprocity as the means of decidability in political order: They invented The Third Way: Middle Class Market Meritocracy vs Upper/Martial, or Lower/Religious monopoly.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-20 21:48:00 UTC
-
THE SOLUTION TO Kevin MacDonald’s QUESTION OF HOW AND WHY THE CULTURE OF CRITIQU
THE SOLUTION TO Kevin MacDonald’s QUESTION OF HOW AND WHY THE CULTURE OF CRITIQUE
(important) (core)
1) Ashkenazis succeeded in reversal of gender bias in cognitive ability, while maintaining pastoral aggression. (We can easily measure this, and all data I’ve seen supports it.)
2) The result has been adoption of the female group social strategy,
3) … and the Female primate’s reproductive strategy for constraining alphas.
4) Female Humans seek systemic free riding and parasitism upon the commons (force the tribe to pay the cost of her offspring), control reproduction and leadership by undermining, and undermine using disapproval, shaming, ridicule, gossip, straw manning, heaping of undue praise, and spreading of undue criticism. They poison(pollute) the informational commons. All female behavior evolved to either control children at the lowest cost, obtain rents from men and the commons at lowest cost, and to increase the cost of her sex, affection, and political support (positive gossiping), by both scarcity of it an constant undermining in the absence of it. ( It’s a very simple algorithm really.)
5) So, Ashkenazi behavior and its damage to all host civilizations is just Instinct, common interest, common strategy, and not conspiracy: Neither women nor Ashkenazim know that they do. They both destroy unless their behaviors are severely limited. And the lesson is that males that cannot constrain their females (or their proxies) from undermining are too weak to rule (defend). Evolution does its work if men do not.
6) In other words: The Culture of Critique is just the Female Group Evolutionary Strategy making use of each innovation in “distribution” writing, traveling and preaching, printing, mass media, the priesthood and the academy, the entertainment industry and the media rallying women and the underclasses against the aristocracy (white males).
8) The Technological History is: Gossip > Monotheism(writing) > Pseudoscience(printing) > Industrialized Lying (major media)
7) This is the answer to @TOOEdit’s mystery. “They are all female” and act accordingly out of intuition to undermine at all opportunities, and to seek parasitic rents on the commons.
8) Our only mistake was ‘free speech’ rather than free warrantied (ie: truthful) speech. And our means of correction is quite simple. Extend the involuntary warranty we impose upon goods and services to that of speech (information); restore Defamation, (Libel, Slander), and physical retaliation for insult (fighting or ‘the judicial duel’);
We let loose the industrialization of lying under the premise of false speech under the assumption that our high trust people and our high trust habits were universal to man. But they are not only unique to westerners, but unique to western males who aggressively police their honor (reputations) by the aggressive physical and legal suppression of falsehood, and the universal duty to do so.
White males are the human race’s aristocracy and developed aristocratic technological civilization using heroism, truth, sovereignty, reciprocity( empirical law of tort), markets in everything, including a market government between the classes, and markets for information in multiple disciplines.
Only the most competitive people can use meritocracy. The weak cannot. They will lose. Hence why no other civilization evolved what the west did. Truth, Testimony, Sovereignty, Natural Law of Reciprocity: Tort, Markets in everything as a consequence, and competition, reason, empiricism, and science to resolve differences between those markets.
So excellence and superiority are not a question. They’re measurable. We pay the high cost of truth and duty regardless of the cost to the signal hierarchy (dominance or competence hierarchy). We invented truth reason empiricism science, market civilization because only we could – because only the most competitive can succeed under meritocracy.
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-20 20:15:00 UTC
-
Morality Is Objective and The Constitution Is Constructed from It.
1) Moral Objectivity = Reciprocity:Natural Law(of Tort) independent of individual or group opinion. 2) Moral Norms = Portfolios of rights and duties resulting in reciprocity within the group survival strategy. 3) Moral Bias = Expression of gender and class reproductive strategy. The problem is that we all want to ‘lie a bit’ and promote our individual strategy over the Group’s and the Groups over Evolutionary Necessity: Mankind. And that constitution survived until the war of northern aggression by which the industrialized north conquered the south because the west would have allied with the south and left the north a weak competitor to Europe, dominated by the agrarian aristocratic south. The constitution was the first written attempt to formally capture The Natural Law of Reciprocity as the means of decidability in political order: They invented The Third Way: Middle Class Market Meritocracy vs Upper/Martial, or Lower/Religious monopoly.May 20, 2018 9:48pm -
Morality Is Objective and The Constitution Is Constructed from It.
1) Moral Objectivity = Reciprocity:Natural Law(of Tort) independent of individual or group opinion. 2) Moral Norms = Portfolios of rights and duties resulting in reciprocity within the group survival strategy. 3) Moral Bias = Expression of gender and class reproductive strategy. The problem is that we all want to ‘lie a bit’ and promote our individual strategy over the Group’s and the Groups over Evolutionary Necessity: Mankind. And that constitution survived until the war of northern aggression by which the industrialized north conquered the south because the west would have allied with the south and left the north a weak competitor to Europe, dominated by the agrarian aristocratic south. The constitution was the first written attempt to formally capture The Natural Law of Reciprocity as the means of decidability in political order: They invented The Third Way: Middle Class Market Meritocracy vs Upper/Martial, or Lower/Religious monopoly.May 20, 2018 9:48pm