Curt Doolittle

Form: Outline

  • SMALL HOMOGENOUS IS BEST 1-Narrow populations can (a) correct, (b) develop neote

    SMALL HOMOGENOUS IS BEST
    1-Narrow populations can (a) correct, (b) develop neoteny (c) drift. 2-Wider populations resist correction, neoteny, and drift. 3-The optimum population size for continuous domestication of the distribution is in the hundreds of thousands to low millions.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-31 19:07:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1002265441450983424

  • ( 1-Narrow populations can (a) correct, (b) develop neoteny (c) drift. 2-Wider p

    ( 1-Narrow populations can (a) correct, (b) develop neoteny (c) drift. 2-Wider populations resist correction, resist neoteny, and resist drift. 3 – the optimum population size for continuous domestication of the distribution is in the hundreds of thousands to low millions. )

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-31 19:04:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1002264576560418818

    Reply addressees: @iosif_lazaridis @hbdchick

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1002249547756785664

    IN REPLY TO:

    @iosif_lazaridis

    “We further show that these ancient Icelanders are markedly more similar to their source populations in Scandinavia and the British-Irish Isles than to contemporary Icelanders, who have been shaped by 1100 years of extensive genetic drift. “

    https://t.co/ZuWBtvHolu

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1002249547756785664

  • THE SPECTRUM OF THE FEMININE 1) The Feminine Strategy (Undermine by gossip, ridi

    THE SPECTRUM OF THE FEMININE

    1) The Feminine Strategy (Undermine by gossip, ridicule, shaming)

    2) The Shrill Femmes (Amer. Post-Prostestant)

    3) The Degenerate Femmes (Fr. Post-Catholic).

    4) The Dishonest Femmes (Ashk. Socialists-Marxists)

    5) The Violent Femmes ( Isl. Fundamentalists )

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-31 09:17:00 UTC

  • Our Incremental Destruction

    OUR INCREMENTAL DESTRUCTION The Rebellion Against Evolution 1 – Christianity was bad enough. 2 – Adding women to the voting pool worse 3 – Replacing the Militia and Conscription with Voluntary Service worse. 4 – Allowing (((Aliens))) to engage in propaganda, parasitism, and deceit the worst. 5 – Adding women to the military a final catastrophe. THE PROPAGANDA OF INCREMENTAL DESTRUCTION The organized destruction of the militia that is the origin of the uniqueness of western civilization. 1 – Effeminate Religion, 2 – Marxism, 3 – Cosmopolitanism, 4 – Feminism, 5 – Postmodernism, Devolution by the Feminine. THE UNIQUENESS OF THE WEST: The order of the militia: the distributed dictatorship of sovereign men. 1 – Sovereignty, Reciprocity, 2 – Truth, Duty, 3 – Rule of Law, Markets in Everything. Evolution by the Masculine.

  • Our Incremental Destruction

    OUR INCREMENTAL DESTRUCTION The Rebellion Against Evolution 1 – Christianity was bad enough. 2 – Adding women to the voting pool worse 3 – Replacing the Militia and Conscription with Voluntary Service worse. 4 – Allowing (((Aliens))) to engage in propaganda, parasitism, and deceit the worst. 5 – Adding women to the military a final catastrophe. THE PROPAGANDA OF INCREMENTAL DESTRUCTION The organized destruction of the militia that is the origin of the uniqueness of western civilization. 1 – Effeminate Religion, 2 – Marxism, 3 – Cosmopolitanism, 4 – Feminism, 5 – Postmodernism, Devolution by the Feminine. THE UNIQUENESS OF THE WEST: The order of the militia: the distributed dictatorship of sovereign men. 1 – Sovereignty, Reciprocity, 2 – Truth, Duty, 3 – Rule of Law, Markets in Everything. Evolution by the Masculine.

  • ONCE YOU SEE IT YOU CAN’T UNSEE IT 1 ) Via Positiva vs Via Negativa 2 ) Additive

    ONCE YOU SEE IT YOU CAN’T UNSEE IT

    1 ) Via Positiva vs Via Negativa

    2 ) Additive vs Subtractive

    3 ) Reason vs Science

    4 ) Logic vs Correspondence

    5 ) Rationalism vs Empiricism

    6 ) Justification vs Falsification

    7 ) (((Pilpul vs Critique)))

    8 ) (((Marxism))) vs Postmodernism

    9 ) (((Abrahamism))) vs Natural Law

    10) Conflation vs Deconflation

    11) Ambiguation vs Disambiguation

    It’s:

    Pilpul Via-Positiva Justification (deception)

    -vs-

    Critique via Negativa Falsification (deception).

    The invention of lying through loading, framing, overloading,

    and suggestion under cover of appeals to reasonableness,

    rather than Truth.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-30 14:38:00 UTC

  • OUR INCREMENTAL DESTRUCTION The Rebellion Against Evolution 1 – Christianity was

    OUR INCREMENTAL DESTRUCTION

    The Rebellion Against Evolution

    1 – Christianity was bad enough.

    2 – Adding women to the voting pool worse

    3 – Replacing the Militia and Conscription with Voluntary Service worse.

    4 – Allowing (((Aliens))) to engage in propaganda, parasitism, and deceit the worst.

    5 – Adding women to the military a final catastrophe.

    THE PROPAGANDA OF INCREMENTAL DESTRUCTION

    The organized destruction of the militia that is the origin of the uniqueness of western civilization.

    1 – Effeminate Religion,

    2 – Marxism,

    3 – Cosmopolitanism,

    4 – Feminism,

    5 – Postmodernism,

    Devolution by the Feminine.

    THE UNIQUENESS OF THE WEST:

    The order of the militia: the distributed dictatorship of sovereign men.

    1 – Sovereignty, Reciprocity,

    2 – Truth, Duty,

    3 – Rule of Law, Markets in Everything.

    Evolution by the Masculine.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-30 08:04:00 UTC

  • NOTES: Constant vs contingent vs inconsistent vs non-relations. Recursive Contin

    NOTES:

    1. Constant vs contingent vs inconsistent vs non-relations.
    2. Recursive Continuous Disambiguation vs Scale of Set of Constant Relations(density)
    3. Cumulation of association vs falsification of associations
    4. Computational efficiency.
    5. State Persistence vs breadth search, vs depth search
    6. We cannot know the intelligence of distant ancestors.
    7. Planning a series of steps in sequence must emerge – which requires recursion.
    8. Consciousness must emerge, meaning, the ability to compare states.
    9. Cooperation must emerge, meaning, the ability to empathize with intent.
    10. At some point we must develop sufficient computational ability to manipulate our bodies in some way that allows for unambiguous communication, or a means of continuous disambiguation, that is fast enough for one another to make use of in real time, and easy enough for one another to retain.
    11. And at some point, given sufficient computational ability, memory, and state persistence independent of recursion, language must emerge.
    12. At some point the value of such communication much be such that the cost of it is offset by the rewards of it.
    13. And we should see a cliff in history where there is a dramatic change when we did develop those abilities. And we do see it – rather recently.

    But language requires a system of measurement. The system of measurement is limited by our senses. And as such meaning refers to a set of measurements, eventually reducible to analogies to human experience. So while semantic content (measurements) must vary from species to species, grammar (continuous recursive disambiguation) should be universal in the sense that it varies predictably with computational abilities. We can understand a child, a person with 60IQ, 70IQ and so on, up to 200+ IQ. But as far as I can tell the set of measurements (basis of semantics) remain the same, and all that changes is the scope of the state persisted, the depth of recursion, and the density and distance of relations, and the ability to model (forecast). In other words, simple people are in fact simply ‘more simple’ in the density of content of their semantics, use of grammar, and models (Stories) that they can construct with them. So universal grammar as a set of computational minimums and efficiencies, should always exist, and human universal grammar as universal grammar limited to human measurements (semantics), does exist. And any organism with sufficient computational (neural) capacity, should develop some means of communication using some variation of universal grammar, and some sense-perception – action dependent semantics. May 29, 2018 4:28pm

  • NOTES: Constant vs contingent vs inconsistent vs non-relations. Recursive Contin

    NOTES:

    1. Constant vs contingent vs inconsistent vs non-relations.
    2. Recursive Continuous Disambiguation vs Scale of Set of Constant Relations(density)
    3. Cumulation of association vs falsification of associations
    4. Computational efficiency.
    5. State Persistence vs breadth search, vs depth search
    6. We cannot know the intelligence of distant ancestors.
    7. Planning a series of steps in sequence must emerge – which requires recursion.
    8. Consciousness must emerge, meaning, the ability to compare states.
    9. Cooperation must emerge, meaning, the ability to empathize with intent.
    10. At some point we must develop sufficient computational ability to manipulate our bodies in some way that allows for unambiguous communication, or a means of continuous disambiguation, that is fast enough for one another to make use of in real time, and easy enough for one another to retain.
    11. And at some point, given sufficient computational ability, memory, and state persistence independent of recursion, language must emerge.
    12. At some point the value of such communication much be such that the cost of it is offset by the rewards of it.
    13. And we should see a cliff in history where there is a dramatic change when we did develop those abilities. And we do see it – rather recently.

    But language requires a system of measurement. The system of measurement is limited by our senses. And as such meaning refers to a set of measurements, eventually reducible to analogies to human experience. So while semantic content (measurements) must vary from species to species, grammar (continuous recursive disambiguation) should be universal in the sense that it varies predictably with computational abilities. We can understand a child, a person with 60IQ, 70IQ and so on, up to 200+ IQ. But as far as I can tell the set of measurements (basis of semantics) remain the same, and all that changes is the scope of the state persisted, the depth of recursion, and the density and distance of relations, and the ability to model (forecast). In other words, simple people are in fact simply ‘more simple’ in the density of content of their semantics, use of grammar, and models (Stories) that they can construct with them. So universal grammar as a set of computational minimums and efficiencies, should always exist, and human universal grammar as universal grammar limited to human measurements (semantics), does exist. And any organism with sufficient computational (neural) capacity, should develop some means of communication using some variation of universal grammar, and some sense-perception – action dependent semantics. May 29, 2018 4:28pm

  • Conservatism Understood

    1. A conservative questions the overestimation of reason, and above all questions consensus. Conservatism is familial, stoic, pragmatic, and empirical. In other words risk averse to capital. 2. As a means of questioning, a conservative requires reciprocity (tort): american < british < anglo saxon < germanic < european < norther indo european in law. That law evolved from the oath (tell the truth, never steal, never flee, in combat). 3. A Conservative requires ‘empirical’ results – and where empirical fails, the ‘traditional’ is adequate, since traditional survived empirical tests in competition in reality. 4. A Conservative accumulates genetic, cultural, normative, institutional, physical, and territorial capital – attempting to pass on to future generations of his family, more than he himself inherited. 5. Conservatism is a eugenic group evolutionary strategy that increases accumulated capital through intergenerational transfer, using intergeneration lending, in order to produce increasingly ‘noble’ families. 6. Ergo successful individuals in the market for craftsmanship, successful purchase of the franchise through military service, successful individuals in the market for marriage and child rearing, successful individuals in the market for industry, successful families in the market for noble (intergenerational) families. 7. In other words, conservatism(aristocracy) is a eugenic group evolutionary strategy. And while bipartite manorialism was practiced from 700, and aggressive hanging of up to 1% of the population every year after 1000, and an attempt to escape church-state nobility, and create an entrepreneurial nobility (meritocracy), succeeded by 1600, there was a great reaction to the english revolution, and a greater reaction to the french revolution. Thus while Locke,smith,hume,adams, and jefferson promised an aristocracy available to everyone, Burke, after the french revolution, and germans after that, recognized that the peasantry was even worse at rule (see russia) than the nobility. The problem with today’s conservatism is that darwin and spencer were famous before the war, after the second world war, conservatism and eugenics were effectively banned from discourse, academy, and science. As such conservatives never (until perhaps 2000) restored empirical discourse to conservatism, because eugenics are antithetical to the experiment with democracy. This changed incrementally beginning in 76, through the 80s, and aggressively since 2000, and more aggressively since 2008. 1 – Soveriengty requires reciprocity 2 – Reciprocity requires rule of law (tort), jury(thang, senate, house of lords, supreme court), and an independent judiciary. 3 – Rule of law forces markets, since it incrementally suppresses each innovation in parasitism. 4 – Markets cause hierarchies, because they are necessary to voluntarily organize production. 5 – Markets are eugenic, because they are empirical means of testing industry and impulse. 6 – But they make possible liberty for those with property, freedom for those who labor, and subsidy for those who impose no costs on sovereignty, liberty, freedom, or property.** DOMESTICATION Man domesticated the human animal after he had learned to domesticate the non-human animal. And he did so by the same means. And the result in both domestication of the human and non human animal is the same: eugenics. May 28, 2018 10:37am