Form: Outline

  • There is only one law in the unverse: 1. the universe is under pressure 2. it ca

    There is only one law in the unverse:
    1. the universe is under pressure
    2. it can relieve pressure by dissipation or concentration
    3. It can dissipate into expansion. It can concentrate in ‘whirlpools’, dipoles, waves, protoparticles, particles, elements, molecules etc: by recombination.
    4. This process is random (physics) until it isn’t (biology), and unconscious until it isn’t (sentience).
    5. Because this is a simple process of of charge(spin) (-) and (+) and because any interaction can produce a stable relations (=) or collapse (!=), we call this process ‘Evolutionary computation of stable relations by continuous recursive disambiguation of disorder(Entropy) into order (negative entropy).”

    Evolutionary Computation: The universe is that simple. Just one simple rule.

    Reply addressees: @FarajRashi93307 @TechRobot4K


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-15 20:19:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680311251589648384

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680308815957196801

  • The Science: 1) The universe is absurdly simple once we understand it. 2) Sex di

    The Science:
    1) The universe is absurdly simple once we understand it.
    2) Sex differences are the origin of all human differences.
    3) Human differences are very simple in origin.
    (a) female strategy is in-time, vs male is over time.
    (b) female empathizing in-time, vs male systematizing over time
    (c) female devotion in time , vs male loyalty over time
    (d) female hyperconsumption in time, vs male hypercapitalization over time.
    (e) female evasion of cellular damage (risk), vs male tolerance for cellular damage (risk)
    (f) female evasion of responsibility for commons in time and male seeking responsibility for commons over time.
    (g) female consumption via male responsibility for commons, male reproduction by female responsibility for offspring.
    AND
    (h) Europeans are the least racist race, but the highest status race. (Even though Race Status ~= Neotenic Evolution and East Asians are more neotenous than europeans (though we should be equal – because we were – if not for farmer and steppe introgression)

    In other words all female vs male behavior is reducible to responsibility for self vs commons, and status by consumption vs capitalization. As such all female behavior ex explicable by evasion of responsibility rather than caretaking. Caretaking is the means by which they defend against their irresponsibility. In other words, it’s peacock feathers: signaling.

    Happy to answer all reasonably intelligent, intellectually honest questions.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @TechRobot4K


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-15 19:38:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680300771487670272

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680297465818279936

  • Great Question 0) Question poses the interesting error of populism suggesting th

    Great Question
    0) Question poses the interesting error of populism suggesting the because more people like it it’s better, vs what is the demonstrated evolutionary economic and intellectual result of what they like.

    Reasons For Western Vulnerability
    1) Wealth problem – as wealth increases class opportunity increases, and this requires decades to generations to develop institutions and norms to accommodate.
    2) women introduced into politics – decline is entirely the result of women’s voting. Without women we’d never have had any ‘Progressive’ governments.
    3) Jewish postwar ‘march through western institutions of cultural production’ of individual responsibility. Marxist-to-woke sequence.
    4) “Hole” in western trifunctionalism and law that tolerates baiting into hazard – the means by which the Abrahamic religions both supernatural and modern marxist pseudoscientific ‘bait’ women and underclasses.
    5) Small percentage of the world – east Asia and western Europe have high enough IQ’s over 100 for secular humanitarianism stoicism and science.
    6) Islam appeals to low IQ demographics: 84 IQ average meaning that half or more of the population is incapable of western levels of education cooperation and skills.

    That’s the answer and it’s not complicated.
    Also see my post above on european vs semitic brain structure. We are waiting for genetics to confirm that semitic speakers (afro asiatics) as well as all MENA (south eurasians) are from an earlier generation of man with lower neotenic evolution. (Which is obvious we just need the science to ‘overcome’ resistance to publishing it.)

    Reply addressees: @EdwardSpruit @Logos_Elect @Lord__Sousa


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-15 17:51:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680273984812662785

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680270274225221633

  • RUSSIA IS HEADING INTO BECOMING A NORTH KOREA? (Worth Repeating) The Eight Possi

    RUSSIA IS HEADING INTO BECOMING A NORTH KOREA?
    (Worth Repeating)

    The Eight Possible Futures for Russia
    … 1) Repeat France (Good): absolutist, big bureaucracy, bloody revolutionary tradition, threatening neighbors, into settling down into not threatening your neighbors. (though france still is, just softly)

    … 2) Authoritarian Leader, don’t threaten your neighbors (solve the ukraine problem, not the russia problem). Because trying to threaten neighbors is a losing game.

    … 3) Chinese Puppet Regime. Stalin vs Mao, reversed. A partner to be anti western to protect the CCP against the west. (Catastrophic for russia as well as the west)

    … 4) The Biggest North Korea we’ve ever seen. Isolated, disconnected from the international system, incentivized for mischief across the board. A semi-puppet regime for china but russia constantly troubles china. (This is the current pathway. (CD: I AGREE))

    … 5) Anarchy and Collapse.

    … 6) This current tragedy continues for decades

    … 7) Apparently, a democratic Russia is off the table? Even with the Marshall Plan Times Ten? I don’t think so.

    … 8) We have no idea. 😉

    via Kotkin.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-14 21:17:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1679963257518342145

  • Evolution of Political Cooperation Villages must evolve into City States City St

    Evolution of Political Cooperation
    Villages must evolve into City States
    City States must evolve into empires
    Empires must devolve into federations
    Federations must devolve into nation states.
    A world of nation states under rule of law of the natural law of cooperation is the maximum possible world of cooperation
    This process calculates an increasingly precise system of weights, measures, and laws, that produce the greatest correspondence between the laws of the universe and the actions of man with the minimum provodation of conflict, retaliation and war among mankind.
    The greatest risk to world peace and harmony is the failure of the west to continue it’s soft eugenics program ensuring that all people progress toward genetic indifference such that we can enjoy economic and political indifference – an indifferene which produces the greatest possible opportunity for fulfillment for all at the expense of none.

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-13 17:33:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1679544711906729998

  • Max (all) Double down on “stress” (a) wealth is the result of the amount of capi

    Max (all)
    Double down on “stress”

    (a) wealth is the result of the amount of capital you can bear responsibility for.
    (b) you gain responsibility because people give it to you.
    (c) people give responsibility to you because they think you can do something with it they can’t do as well themselves.
    (d) The more you are responsible for the more risks you have to mitigate from other people who are as equally competitive because they are equally responsible, and equally trusted.
    (e) The more risks from the more people you have to mitigate in competition with people who are equlally responsible, competitive, and mitigating,
    (f) the trade off is that the quality of opportunities for you to gain responsibility for, mitigate, and profit from, increases, so that you have inverted the supply demand curve facing all people who want to gain wealth. And the quality of people you deal with are more responsible themselves, more capable themselves, and mitigate more effectively themselves.
    (g) And eventually you run into the problem of seeking returns that are no longer from holes in the market unserved by people with more wealth than you have, but competing for commodity opportunities that require vast wealth even to participate in, and which are subject to political risk.
    (h) meanwhile all wealth is subject to entropy (depreciation).
    (i) So every step in that process increases stress.

    I don’t think it’s possible for the average person to comprehend how hard people work who have a great deal of money, nor the condition of stress they are under the entire time. Nor how prescious any time away from that stress is. Nor how impossible it is to escape it at all. You must treat every person you interact with as wanting something from you. You can only really trust a few close people. And a yacht for example is a reprieve, and worth every cent – simply because people can’t get to you. 😉

    I know myself, running companes across north america and europe, and with customers worldwide, that I can outwork most people. But there are people who can outwork me, and people for whom outworking me is simply much easier, and less stressful. You must process information and make decisions and judge people constantly.

    In other words, just as there are sports athletes there are social athletes, work athletes, and intellectual athletes. And most of us understand that atletics of each kind combines some kind of strength with one thing: endurance that is unberable and unimaginable by the majority.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @themaxstoic


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-13 14:37:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1679500243765788672

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1679493486070976514

  • Evolution|: Movement > Embodiment > Anthropocentrism > Anthropomorphism > Mythol

    |Evolution|: Movement > Embodiment > Anthropocentrism > Anthropomorphism > Mythology(narrative explanation) > Theology(Standardization of strategy by dictate, (Mythicism)) > Philosophy(Rational choice by advice, History, (Sets)) > Empiricism (assistance in testimony, Measurements, (Mathematics)) > Science(instrumental testimony, Intrumental measurements, (Calculus)) > Operationalism(falsificationary survival by construction from first principles, (computation)) > [End of Possibility.]

    Or simply Incompetent Child Myth, Limited Adult Theology, Comptent Adult Philosophy > Professional Adult Science > Extraordinary Adult Operationalism.

    Or better yet: wisdom for the less competent (theology), assistance for the competent from philosophy, and truth for the superior in abiilty by science and operationalism.

    As historians have said for centuries, philosophy is the young adult bridge between immature theology and mature science.

    Reply addressees: @wwrockin @BronskiJoseph @TheAutistocrat


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-05 19:54:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1676680867870064640

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1676675172055801856

  • John Same conclusion in my work. 1. Falsification increases precision 2. Justifi

    John
    Same conclusion in my work.
    1. Falsification increases precision
    2. Justification decreases precision.
    3. Truth results in survival from adversarial competition. (Popperian verisimilitude, juridical adversarial competition, economic equilibria, evolutionary computation by survival.)
    4. That’s oddly enough (to the frustration of philosophers) because logic is always falsificationary demonstrating only that identities, propositions, and arguments survive – not that they are justified.
    5. There is quite bit of this ‘mathiness ‘ bias in the history of european thought. There are no such things as proofs of truths only tests of survivability of truth claims.

    RE:
    (- Counterfactuals Increase LLM Moral Reasoning Accuracy, CoT Decreases It
    – Eliciting counterfactuals in LLM prompts increases accuracy on Moral Scenarios tasks of MMLU by 9-16%
    – Unlike math reasoning, Chain-of-Thought reduces accuracy on “Moral Reasoning” ) – John Nay

    Reply addressees: @johnjnay @GoogleAI


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-04 18:59:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1676304732015456256

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1676269433646374913

  • THE FIVE SEX DIFFERENCES IN INTELLIGENCE 1. Depending upon which numbers you put

    THE FIVE SEX DIFFERENCES IN INTELLIGENCE
    1. Depending upon which numbers you put your trust in, the sex differences are under a half standard deviation, with men’s average slightly higher by four or five points. (Usually attributed to men’s 10% larger brains because men are 10% larger. 😉 ).

    2. The second difference is in the distribution of IQs between the sexes, with women narrower and men broader producing more outliers top and bottom. There are no female equivalents of einstein – despite desperately trying to find just one for a century.

    3. And the third difference which is perhaps the most meaningful, is in female empathizing-verbal-pictorial, in-time vs male systematizing-mechanical-3D_modeling, over time. This means we specialize, with women producing interesting social and empirical observations (experiences), and men producing interesting physical and theoretical observations (systems) .

    4. And the fourth difference is the male bias to the truth first regardless of feelings, and the female bias to feelings first and conflation of truth and desirability.

    5. And the Fifth difference is most substantial in demonstrated intelligence because females try to avoid responsibility, self-regulation, conflict, and risk at all times, so they’re intolerant of truths that cause them to bear responsibility for self-regulation, conflict by the defense of the commons, and risk because of those conflicts.

    Those five differences describe the sex differences in pretty much the whole range of human behavior.

    (Reality: borderline aspergers and autistic males (the extreme version of the male brain) invent almost everything meaningful because they are almost entirely devoted to systemization.)

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @toodarkmark @TheAutistocrat


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-29 16:18:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1674452314432700417

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1674397225407873028

  • THE AI PROBLEM HIERARCHY (it’s harder than it looks)

    THE AI PROBLEM HIERARCHY
    (it’s harder than it looks) https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1674244106959089664