John Same conclusion in my work. 1. Falsification increases precision 2. Justifi

John
Same conclusion in my work.
1. Falsification increases precision
2. Justification decreases precision.
3. Truth results in survival from adversarial competition. (Popperian verisimilitude, juridical adversarial competition, economic equilibria, evolutionary computation by survival.)
4. That’s oddly enough (to the frustration of philosophers) because logic is always falsificationary demonstrating only that identities, propositions, and arguments survive – not that they are justified.
5. There is quite bit of this ‘mathiness ‘ bias in the history of european thought. There are no such things as proofs of truths only tests of survivability of truth claims.

RE:
(- Counterfactuals Increase LLM Moral Reasoning Accuracy, CoT Decreases It
– Eliciting counterfactuals in LLM prompts increases accuracy on Moral Scenarios tasks of MMLU by 9-16%
– Unlike math reasoning, Chain-of-Thought reduces accuracy on “Moral Reasoning” ) – John Nay

Reply addressees: @johnjnay @GoogleAI