Form: Mini Essay

  • THE MEANING OF COMPLIMENTS I can think something is sentimentally, allegorically

    THE MEANING OF COMPLIMENTS

    I can think something is sentimentally, allegorically, morally, or rationally moral, beautiful or heroic. Meaning that I agree with your sentiments.

    I can admire your attempt at creating an argument – even if you fail.

    But that is different from whether your justification is amoral, or whether you facts are questionable, or whether your judgements are biased, or whether you are engaging in wishful thinking, or whether you engage in verbalism, cunning or deceit, or whether you logic is faulty whether or your argument is necessary, or whether whether it is existentially possible, logically sound, parsimonious my stated and so forth.

    Meaning I can agree with you sentiments. I can encourage your learning. I can support your attempts.

    But I cannot claim that you have constructed a truth candidate.

    And most often what people want is confirmation that their sentiments are classifiable as a truth.

    The truth is rarely emotionally rewarding.

    It just is.

    So that is why I am supportive of good people in their journey.

    But it is also why I will often agree with your sentiments, values and objectives while at the same time faulting your arguments.

    If anything, philosophy is reducible to the science of construction truthful statements in pursuit of truth, whether we like that truth ir not.

    Conveniently, the secret of the west’s competitive advantage is our discovery and frequent use of the truth.

    So when we share a moral bias against the liars and deceives who have destroyed our civilization, we are pursuing the reconstruction of a truthful civil society and the commons we can create from it.

    So we agree on our feelings:,we desire truth.

    But stating that feeling truthfully is almost impossible. And I might argue that before my work it was not possible.

    But now it is. And it is quite simple: we never know the truth but we can clean our language of error bias wishful thinking and deceit with some effort.

    And we can require it of others I public speech.

    And we can punish offenders.

    And we can clean ourselves and others of falsehoods.

    Leaving only truth behind.

    This is the greatest transformation of man since Darwin if not since the enlightenment.

    Welcome to the revolution.

    A sentiment we can all share.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-10-08 13:35:00 UTC

  • Ashkenazi Colonialism: Eastern Europe Had Anarchism – And the People Suffered Under Despotism

    [C]ontext: My objective is to falsify if not quash and destroy the Anglo, German, and Jewish Enlightenments, as deceptive, erroneous, and catastrophic failures to generalize group evolutionary strategies, so that I may explain the next step in our political evolution: to replace monopoly government (majority rule) with the combination of strictly constructed, objectively moral, universal, rule of law, with a political market for the voluntary production of commons wherein we replace majority assent with minority dissent only possible by legal means. Hence I attack the anglo equalitarian, german rationalist, and jewish pseudoscientific systems of thought. While science has invalidated the anglo over the past two decades, and propertarian philosophy has allowed me to invalidated the german because of the 20th century advances in the philosophy of science, it has taken me longer to understand why the jewish means of propaganda (deception) is so effective at deceiving the pathological altruism of western europeans. This post is another in the series on the origins of jewish propagandism (loading, framing, overloading and suggesting suicidal actions.) [M]y interest in anarchism evaporated after a few months of living in Ukraine. Because Eastern Europe is where the Cosmopolitan authors got their ideas – from practicing it. A minority managing and preying upon society through privatization of commons produced by conqueror’s military action, but not paid for by the managers themselves. In other words, Cosmopolitan Anarchism is a dishonest attempt to restore the predation of private ownership prosecuted by the Jews against eastern Europe under the protection of external military conquerors (austrian, lithiania, poland, muscovy). In more accurate terms: Ashkenazi Colonialism. Wherein an administrative class is effectively hired to parasitically manage a conquered people and territory. We see this pattern in Iraq, where the same people have formed the administrative (bureaucratic) layer for the Bathist regime. We saw this in Russia where the same people formed the ideological and administrative layer for the Soviets – and the slaughter of the people. We see this in america where the same people have formed the propaganda layer (previously the priesthood) in academy and media for the imperial and colonial american state, and the combined neo-puritain, socialist, libertine, and neo-conservative agendas. In his book “The Fatal Embrace” author “Benjamin Ginsburg” argues that the jews must end their ongoing strategy of allying with the state as a means of oppressing the people, because in every case it results in their exclusion or extermination. —“Thus, over the past several centuries, Jews have played important roles in the construction of absolutist, liberal, and socialist states as well as major parts in movements seeking to reform or supplant regimes to which they were unable to obtain access. Jews have traditionally offered their services to the state in exchange for the regime’s guarantee of security and opportunity. Ironically, however, precisely this relationship between Jews and the state has often sparked organized anti-Semitic attacks.”— (See: http://www.amazon.com/Fatal-Embrace-Jews-State/dp/0226296652/) Anarchism is an ode to lost predation on the serfs of Eastern Europe just like James Bond is an ode to lost empire: they’re both fictions, and late twentieth century action movies are an ode to America’s lost moral high ground. “Voluntary-everything” is equivalent to Lawlessness. It is another great deception like Marxism and neoconservatism: a half truth preying upon the optimistic moral bias of western aristocratic egalitarians and their pathological altruism. Liberty, meaning the ability to do as you with without imposing costs upon others, is a product of the rule of law. And the only principle means of decidability for law that can possibly produce a condition of liberty is the prohibition on the imposition of costs, which we express as property rights, and the scope of those rights evolves in parallel to the evolution of the means of imposing costs that is the product of the expansion of technologies, methods of cooperation, and the division of labor. And we seek parasitism because it is much easier and more rewarding than production. So a few moral men rally to prohibit these parasitisms so that they and all can prosper. Those few men impose rule of law on an immoral population. These men constitute the western aristocracy. Rule of law. Nomocracy. The prohibition on the imposition of costs that result in free riding on the productivity of others. Aristocracy is the only source of liberty.

  • Ashkenazi Colonialism: Eastern Europe Had Anarchism – And the People Suffered Under Despotism

    [C]ontext: My objective is to falsify if not quash and destroy the Anglo, German, and Jewish Enlightenments, as deceptive, erroneous, and catastrophic failures to generalize group evolutionary strategies, so that I may explain the next step in our political evolution: to replace monopoly government (majority rule) with the combination of strictly constructed, objectively moral, universal, rule of law, with a political market for the voluntary production of commons wherein we replace majority assent with minority dissent only possible by legal means. Hence I attack the anglo equalitarian, german rationalist, and jewish pseudoscientific systems of thought. While science has invalidated the anglo over the past two decades, and propertarian philosophy has allowed me to invalidated the german because of the 20th century advances in the philosophy of science, it has taken me longer to understand why the jewish means of propaganda (deception) is so effective at deceiving the pathological altruism of western europeans. This post is another in the series on the origins of jewish propagandism (loading, framing, overloading and suggesting suicidal actions.) [M]y interest in anarchism evaporated after a few months of living in Ukraine. Because Eastern Europe is where the Cosmopolitan authors got their ideas – from practicing it. A minority managing and preying upon society through privatization of commons produced by conqueror’s military action, but not paid for by the managers themselves. In other words, Cosmopolitan Anarchism is a dishonest attempt to restore the predation of private ownership prosecuted by the Jews against eastern Europe under the protection of external military conquerors (austrian, lithiania, poland, muscovy). In more accurate terms: Ashkenazi Colonialism. Wherein an administrative class is effectively hired to parasitically manage a conquered people and territory. We see this pattern in Iraq, where the same people have formed the administrative (bureaucratic) layer for the Bathist regime. We saw this in Russia where the same people formed the ideological and administrative layer for the Soviets – and the slaughter of the people. We see this in america where the same people have formed the propaganda layer (previously the priesthood) in academy and media for the imperial and colonial american state, and the combined neo-puritain, socialist, libertine, and neo-conservative agendas. In his book “The Fatal Embrace” author “Benjamin Ginsburg” argues that the jews must end their ongoing strategy of allying with the state as a means of oppressing the people, because in every case it results in their exclusion or extermination. —“Thus, over the past several centuries, Jews have played important roles in the construction of absolutist, liberal, and socialist states as well as major parts in movements seeking to reform or supplant regimes to which they were unable to obtain access. Jews have traditionally offered their services to the state in exchange for the regime’s guarantee of security and opportunity. Ironically, however, precisely this relationship between Jews and the state has often sparked organized anti-Semitic attacks.”— (See: http://www.amazon.com/Fatal-Embrace-Jews-State/dp/0226296652/) Anarchism is an ode to lost predation on the serfs of Eastern Europe just like James Bond is an ode to lost empire: they’re both fictions, and late twentieth century action movies are an ode to America’s lost moral high ground. “Voluntary-everything” is equivalent to Lawlessness. It is another great deception like Marxism and neoconservatism: a half truth preying upon the optimistic moral bias of western aristocratic egalitarians and their pathological altruism. Liberty, meaning the ability to do as you with without imposing costs upon others, is a product of the rule of law. And the only principle means of decidability for law that can possibly produce a condition of liberty is the prohibition on the imposition of costs, which we express as property rights, and the scope of those rights evolves in parallel to the evolution of the means of imposing costs that is the product of the expansion of technologies, methods of cooperation, and the division of labor. And we seek parasitism because it is much easier and more rewarding than production. So a few moral men rally to prohibit these parasitisms so that they and all can prosper. Those few men impose rule of law on an immoral population. These men constitute the western aristocracy. Rule of law. Nomocracy. The prohibition on the imposition of costs that result in free riding on the productivity of others. Aristocracy is the only source of liberty.

  • AMERICA HAS A MENTAL HEALTH PROBLEM EXACERBATED BY THE PREVALENCE OF MENTAL HEAL

    AMERICA HAS A MENTAL HEALTH PROBLEM EXACERBATED BY THE PREVALENCE OF MENTAL HEALTH DRUGS.

    The revelation that Umpqua Community College shooter Chris Mercer used the screen name “lithium love,” along with other references to prescription medication, strongly suggests that the gunman was taking psychiatric drugs that have been linked to violent outbursts.

    —“There are a number of indications that Harper-Mercer had mental health or behavioral issues. His screen name on some social media sites was “lithium love.” Lithium is used as a psychiatric medication.”—

    Lithium is used to enhance the effect of SSRI drugs, a number of which, “have also been linked to increase risk for violent, even homicidal behavior,” reports Time.

    On one of his Facebook posts, Mercer also made reference to a number of different prescription drugs he was taking.

    “I have a pill bottle with like five types of pills mixed in. I don’t know which ones are the sleep aids, so I just took four of each,” wrote Mercer.

    (DISCLAIMER: I have been taking mild prescription drugs for my obsessive aspie-thinking for thirty years, which dramatically reduces the challenge of changing contexts – and so I have some familiarity with the effects of these drugs even if I cannot really comprehend the desire to do violence. Or well, other than in the abstract political sense. 😉 )


    Source date (UTC): 2015-10-06 16:35:00 UTC

  • DEAL DESTROYERS AMONG US!!! Yeah. Common catastrophe: failure to research the in

    DEAL DESTROYERS AMONG US!!!

    Yeah. Common catastrophe: failure to research the interests of every decision maker on the other side. (Ignorance) usually caused by Selfishness. Laziness. Wishful Thinking. (and outright lack of intellectual capacity.)

    Lawyers are the WORST at f__king up deals by the opposite means. On the scale of risk protect us from likely scenarios, but do not burden us with constraints. This is unwise. Stop them.

    Middle (and senior) management folks are too often enthusiastic imbeciles trying to stroke their egos and careers and get attention by demonstrating their ‘value’. This is unwise. Stop them.

    Most of the time ignore your lawyer, and listen to your finance guy (assuming he’s skeptical). Your finance guy will try to show his cunning by seeking extra profit somehow. This is unwise. Stop him.

    Ask your sales people (not marketing). Even though they are largely blabber-mouths, sales people are in the business of determining incentives.

    Learn basic Austrian economics (incentives of rational choice: marginalism, subjective value) and micro-economics, as well as finance and the first two years of basic accounting.

    Learn how to write your own contracts. It’s just like programming really. There are design patterns, functions, objects, etc. “Simple-er is better-er”. Give lawyers your draft to start from. Try to cut everything they add unless they can justify it to you.

    In a business deal, if you do not want it on the front page of the NYT, then don’t do it. It will f__king haunt you, and you deserve it. My position is to hold the moral high ground no matter what. We all screw up. But there is no down side to doing the right thing.

    EMPHASIS ON M&A DEALS:

    Furthermore the secret to M&A deals:

    (a) companies have no objective value – none. Numbers are meaningless.

    (b) the price of a business is what it requires to tip the decision makers.

    (c) very often that price is lower if liquid, higher if not, and more often money is a secondary concern.

    (d) the cost is determined by the impact of the effort to merge the business cultures and processes.

    (e) use relationship building, time to comfortably adapt, and abstract goals to do it rather than micro management and detailed top down planning.

    (f) every manager’s opinion of staff is the opposite of factual value, since managers are mostly dead weight and rely on staff for upward processing of information. Mergers are good opportunity to give hidden talent room to innovate. Look for it.

    (g) a low end venture capitalist is looking to create addicts. They will very often burn shareholders, staff, management and founders. You are a ‘drug user’ they are trying to hook while you are in startup mode. Once you have value you are a debtor (addict). They will treat you like one the moment they prefer to exit. (No, not the big players, which is why you want them, but many of the rest. Selling money in an investment hierarchy and selling drugs in a distribution hierarchy are similar business models. )


    Source date (UTC): 2015-10-06 09:39:00 UTC

  • SIMPLEST THEORY OF LEFT AND RIGHT Brian, As you say, evolutionary biology provid

    http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2015/10/my_simplistic_t.htmlTHE SIMPLEST THEORY OF LEFT AND RIGHT

    Brian,

    As you say, evolutionary biology provides greatest explanatory power.

    REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGIES

    (1) FEMALE: The female reproductive strategy is to bear children at will and to place responsibility for their sustenance on the tribe. The female’s interest is to secure a future for her offspring regardless of merit. Her interest is in consumption regardless of externality.

    (2) MALE: The male reproductive strategy is to form alliances of near relations of males (brothers) into the strongest possible tribe and to secure their territory against (parasitic) competition. The male’s interest is to secure the competitive persistence of his kin (tribe) which depends upon merit. His interest is in capital accumulation.

    Human males evolved to kill off males in opposing groups and collect females. And that females evolved to place greater emphasis on children and females than the tribe (males).

    CLASSES

    Social Classes are sorted by reproductive desirability. Economic classes largely reflect social classes. Rotation is limited out of economic classes for this reason. And the lower classes increasingly vote the female reproductive strategy for the same reason females do.

    WEAPONS OF INFLUENCE

    There are only three weapons of influence :

    (1) Violence (ostracism, punishment, death)

    (2) Remuneration (compensation, trade)

    (3) Gossip (rallying and shaming – threats of deprivation from association, cooperation, affection, and sex)

    MORAL INTUITIONS AS PROPERTY RIGHTS

    Of Haidt’s evolutionary origins of moral intuitions, three can be expressed as individual property rights:

    1. Care/harm for others, protecting them from harm. (The asset of life and body.)

    2. Proportionality/cheating, Justice, treating others in proportion to their actions. (The asset of goods.)

    3. Liberty/Oppression, characterizes judgments in terms of whether subjects are tyrannized. (The asset of time, opportunity.)

    And three others can be expressed as community property rights covering social capital. Which obviously enough, have been, and continue to be, mirrored in corporate shareholder agreements.

    4. In-Group Loyalty/In-Group Betrayal to/of your group, family, nation, polity.

    5. Respect/Authority/Subversion for tradition and legitimate authority.

    6. Purity/Sanctity/Degradation/Disgust, avoiding disgusting things, foods, actions.

    SUMMARY

    Conservatives represent the more reproductively desirable and masculine spectrum. Leftists represent the more reproductively undesirable and feminine spectrum.

    IN THE DATA

    This explains the voting data in which white males and married females vote predominantly RED(tribe), while single females and minorities vote left(Self).

    The south’s anti-republicanism from the civil war obscured this trend, but the end of that divide led to the increasing polarization of the electorate.

    WE NEGOTIATE ON BEHALF OF OUR GENES

    And we use Violence, Remuneration, and Gossip to acquire resources on our gene’s behalf. Everything we say is the result of our reproductive strategy.

    That’s the simple answer.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2015-10-05 16:37:00 UTC

  • LOGIC FOR MODELING MANKIND (learning propertarianism) (important piece) I’ve con

    http://www.propertarianism.com/2015/07/27/property-rights-and-obligations/PROPERTARIANISM: LOGIC FOR MODELING MANKIND

    (learning propertarianism) (important piece)

    I’ve constructed Propertarianism to model man as he(she) is, not as we wish he would be. This model turns out to be fairly simple to use:

    I – ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY EN TOTO

    You make a list of the property-en-toto that people want to acquire.

    II – +COOPERATION / -PARASITISM

    You treat productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchange as a the only rational incentive to cooperate; and the only fully rational reason to abandon conflict, parasitism and predation. And you also require actions be free of externality against those with whom you already cooperate.

    III – +PREMIUMS / -DISCOUNTING

    Then you treat all exchanges that vary from productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchange as discounts(cheating) or premiums(buying insurance).

    IV – REPRODUCTIVE BIAS: MALE=TRIBE / FEMALE=OFFSPRING

    Human males(quality/production), and females (quantity/consumption) vary in their reproductive strategies.

    V – FITNESS (CLASS)

    Now, humans vary in objective (a)reproductive value and (b)productive(multiplier) value, and (c)associative(opportunity) value (social, economic and political class).

    VI – +ADVOCACY/-JUSTIFICATION

    And we humans advocate on behalf of our reproductives strategy. Almost everything we utter justifies our reproductive strategy or negotiates on behalf of our reproductive strategy.

    VII – +REWARD / -COERCION

    And there are three ways of coercing others into helping with your reproductive strategy (or conversely, hindering their reproductive strategy), and those three are 1) voluntary productive exchange (libertarian/commercial), 2) lying /gossiping /rallying (progressive/priesthood), and 3) threat of violence (conservative/martial)

    VIII – GROUP REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY

    And humans cooperate using a shared group evolutionary (competitive) strategy making use of some combination of the three means of coercion: commerce(+reward/-theft), gossip/priesthood(+status/-rallying), Warriors/soldiers/judges(+law/-war) [*1]

    USING PROPERTARIAN REASONING (LOGIC)

    So, just like economics and mathematics we cannot imagine every possible actions man might take, or set of relations we can construct, but we can explain every possible action man demonstrates in propertarian terms, and every mathematical relation we construct.

    In other words, using propertarianism as a formal logic, you should be able to ‘solve for’ any demonstrated human behavior.

    This is why propertarianism is so fully explanatory. You have to practice it and master it like you do mathematics, or programming, or chemistry, or physics. But after you do practice it a while, you begin to see the general patterns and you become skilled at explaining all human behavior.

    SOCIAL SCIENCE IS NOT PREDICTIVE IT IS EXPLANATORY

    We can say what men will likely do given certain constraints. But we cannot forecast what men will do with *sufficient precision to predict outcomes*. This is the correct means of describing the predictability of heuristic systems: that human laws of behavior exist. But that they are largely in-actionable. That is because the degree of precision in the laws of social sciences is limited by the capacity of man to learn and constantly alter his deterministic path, for given the information at his disposal. And we have too little knowledge of the information at one’s disposal, and the information held by any individual, to predict other than general directions.

    PROPERTARIANISM PROVIDES US WITH THE FORMAL LOGIC OF SOCIAL SCIENCE.

    And there isn’t much more to it than I have stated in this article.

    SIMULATIONS

    I haven’t the time to build a software simulation for demonstrating human behavior using these ideas, but it isn’t terribly difficult.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.

    LINKS

    Property en Toto

    http://www.propertarianism.com/2015/07/27/property-rights-and-obligations/

    [*1]This is why progressives tried to suppress Darwin in education, and aggressively campaign (gossip) against social darwinism: as self defense of the female reproductive strategy, and the lower class reproductive strategy, against the upper class and male reproductive strategies.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-10-03 11:29:00 UTC

  • AMERICAN MENTAL ILLNESS: CONSUMERISM AS A DRUG THAT MASKS PERVASIVE LONELINESS:

    AMERICAN MENTAL ILLNESS: CONSUMERISM AS A DRUG THAT MASKS PERVASIVE LONELINESS: Natal, childhood, school, work, civil.

    THE STATE DESTROYED US WITH KEYNESIAN ECONOMICS AND FEMINISM

    So basically the science is coming together that shows I was correct: that Americans are desperately lonely people. That mental illness is the result of loneliness. That mothers working is bad for children adults and society. That beta males become dangerous. That while law must be constructed for individuals, policy must be constructed for families. That we must move capital to people not people to capital. That the Anglo enlightenment fallacies were suicidal outside of island Britain. That the Anglo conquest of Germania was the ruination of the west. That feminism is an extension of Anglo mental illness, and exacerbates it. That while the Anglo empirical method is truthful, it’s concept of man is false. That while the german rational method is false the German concept of man is true. That the ashkenazi method is pseudoscientific deception, and that it is disastrous for man.

    The enlightenment was a failure for the reasons i have stated. And that only by recognizing that the medieval methods were inferior, that the medieval concept of man was correct.

    But we can fix it with rule of law alone.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-10-03 04:55:00 UTC

  • ACTUALLY I DONT READ PHILOSOPHY. Marco just reminded me of something I take for

    ACTUALLY I DONT READ PHILOSOPHY.

    Marco just reminded me of something I take for granted: I write philosophy but I read science.

    Philosophical tradition provides us with an established framework for conveying a complete framework of ideas. I use that framework. But I don’t read many philosophers. They’re largely horrible mixtures of theology, pseudoscience, justification of priors and empty verbalises obscuring the absence of relations.

    I view a philosopher’s function as integrating new knowledge into our frames of reference with the ambition of increasing correspondence with reality, because there is advantage in correspondence and disadvantage without.

    And as a consequence a philosopher restructures relations, values, and institutions to make use of that new knowledge.

    Hence in Propertarianism I follow epistemology with psychology, and I follow ethics with sociology, thereby uniting philosophy psychology and social science.

    I view the law as western philosophy and religion. And the judiciary as our priesthood. I view religion and theology, and philosophy largely as propaganda.

    And hence my criticism of continentals who seek to construct a new religion. We already have one – and it’s bad: Progressivism. (Liberalism). Or more precisely “democratic secular redistributive(equalitarian), consumer capitalist, humanism”.

    I usually argue that the mythos of the church was destructive but the church as an institution was amazingly beneficial.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-09-30 12:15:00 UTC

  • PRIVILEGE ENDED 1) Americans conquered a new continent 2) They sold off this con

    http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2015/09/when-america-was-great-taxes-were-high-unions-were-strong-and-government-was-big/407284/POSTWAR PRIVILEGE ENDED

    1) Americans conquered a new continent

    2) They sold off this continent to immigrants

    3) They sold consumer goods to these immigrants.

    4) They caused a collapse in prices in Europe (like china does to americans today)

    5) They created new fiat money to give credit to these immigrants.

    6) They directed these profits to investment in everything including the 20’s boom.

    7) Europeans sought to control german expansion and created the european civil war.

    8) The resulting correction and the oppressive settlement with Germany led to the second world war, which was merely an extension of the first, and which destroyed the word’s economy.

    9) Americans inherited control of the British empire’s trading lanes and took over as the reserve currency.

    10) American workers benefitted from producing expensive but low quality products to a world largely destroyed by war.

    12) It took to the 1970’s for the world to reasonably rebuild.

    13) In 1990 the effects of Chinese abandonment of communism and their entry into world labor started the dramatic shift in american consumption of consumer goods, just as america had done to Europe more than a century before.

    15) In 2007 the rest of the world has largely adopted the same fiat money and consumer capitalist techniques.

    16) In 2015, Americans have lost most competitive advantages EXCEPT for their GERMANIC high trust ethics and rule of law.

    17) By 2040 Americans will lose their advantage in high trust ethics and rule of law to cultural and genetic conquest.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-09-29 22:54:00 UTC