Form: Mini Essay

  • Lying: Methods and Techniques .. Plus A Reading List

    (important) (first draft) (this ought to make some people think) [W]hat I am struck by when researching this topic, is how primitive the research is into HOW lies are constructed. Here are the Axis I am working with: So sticking with the general rules that:

      6) One can speak to:

        5) One can convey :

          7) One can speak using: -construction-

            8) One can speak with:

              9) One can construct speech out of: -axis-

                10) One can engage in discovery by: -discovery-

                  10a) one can engage rallying by: -Rallying-

                    11) One can employ arguments using (true or false) :

                      CATEGORIES OF LIES? —“Nanavati classifies lies into the following categories:”–

                        READING LIST Dallas Denery: The Devil Wins: A History of Lying from the Garden of Eden to the Enlightenment Thomas Carson: Lying and Deception: Theory and Practice Jennifer Mather Saul: Lying, Misleading, and What is Said Clancy Martin: The Philosophy of Deception Herbert Fingarette: Self-Deception Brooke Harrington: Deception: From Ancient Empires to Internet Dating Edward Bernays: Propaganda Jason Stanley: How Propaganda Works Hardcover Jeremy Elkins: Truth and Democracy David Livingstone: Less Than Human: Why We Demean, Enslave, and Exterminate Others Daniel Nanavati: A Brief History Of Lies

                      • The Open Society Experiment Failed

                        [J]ust like every other cosmopolitan pseudoscience. Just another ideological catastrophe. Sorry Karl Popper. You were just subconsciously hoping to recreate your ancestral home in eastern Europe under the remote and disinterested tsars. The Ancient Slaves. The Medieval Jewish Ghetto. Eastern Europe under the Tzars. Israel defended by American arms and money. And the Fallacy of Crusoe’s Island. Surrounded by the sea. But what does the sea that defends Crusoe’s island represent? It represents the walls of the ancient master’s house defended by master and warriors. It represents the ghetto’s walls defended by the european nobles and knights. It represents the eastern european territories defended by the Tsars and the Polish/Lithuanian Armies. It represents Israel defended by American Navy, Arms, Missiles, and money. Crusoe’s island isn’t the source of a general rule from which we learn the origins of liberty. Crusoe’s island is an exception that proves the rule that a people who cannot pay the high cost of land holding inevitably become a parasite on those who do. Popper’s Open Society is just another attempt by a naturally nomadic people so incapable of land holding that it must be genetic defect, and so trained by the megalomaniacal hatred of others, that they promise the duplicity of an open society while forcing others to pay the cost of hosting them. The philosophy of the jews fails every time. If your people cannot pay the high cost of holding land, you are exporting the cost of your housing onto your host civilization. The Gnostics were right. Jehovah was a babylonian devil. And the jews bought his lies hook line and sinker. The open society has been as catastrophic as Marx’s socialism and communism, the Frankfurt School’s postmodernism, Rawlsian Social democracy, rothbardian libertarianism, and Straussian Neo-Conservatism. There is no free ride. There is no safety in universalism. There is only cooperation by the best to prevent conquest by the rest.

                      • The Open Society Experiment Failed

                        [J]ust like every other cosmopolitan pseudoscience. Just another ideological catastrophe. Sorry Karl Popper. You were just subconsciously hoping to recreate your ancestral home in eastern Europe under the remote and disinterested tsars. The Ancient Slaves. The Medieval Jewish Ghetto. Eastern Europe under the Tzars. Israel defended by American arms and money. And the Fallacy of Crusoe’s Island. Surrounded by the sea. But what does the sea that defends Crusoe’s island represent? It represents the walls of the ancient master’s house defended by master and warriors. It represents the ghetto’s walls defended by the european nobles and knights. It represents the eastern european territories defended by the Tsars and the Polish/Lithuanian Armies. It represents Israel defended by American Navy, Arms, Missiles, and money. Crusoe’s island isn’t the source of a general rule from which we learn the origins of liberty. Crusoe’s island is an exception that proves the rule that a people who cannot pay the high cost of land holding inevitably become a parasite on those who do. Popper’s Open Society is just another attempt by a naturally nomadic people so incapable of land holding that it must be genetic defect, and so trained by the megalomaniacal hatred of others, that they promise the duplicity of an open society while forcing others to pay the cost of hosting them. The philosophy of the jews fails every time. If your people cannot pay the high cost of holding land, you are exporting the cost of your housing onto your host civilization. The Gnostics were right. Jehovah was a babylonian devil. And the jews bought his lies hook line and sinker. The open society has been as catastrophic as Marx’s socialism and communism, the Frankfurt School’s postmodernism, Rawlsian Social democracy, rothbardian libertarianism, and Straussian Neo-Conservatism. There is no free ride. There is no safety in universalism. There is only cooperation by the best to prevent conquest by the rest.

                      • CURSING, WE NEVER KNOW THE TRUTH, I CERTAINLY DON’T F__K. Spinoza worked his who

                        CURSING, WE NEVER KNOW THE TRUTH, I CERTAINLY DON’T

                        F__K. Spinoza worked his whole – albeit short – life on two hundred parsimonious pages that still failed to drag western man from mysticism. Kant spent ten years on just his Critique, and created a rationalist version of christianity, rather than science. Marx worked like a dog his whole life only to figure out in the last year or two of his life that his entire project was a failure. Yet he lives on despite his own abandonment of his work. Popper worked his whole life and was, like most of his tribe, only half right, and tragically half wrong with the remainder. Hayek worked his whole life and while he managed to correctly identify that information was the model with which to study mankind – just like it is in physics.; and he managed to correctly identify the common law as the origin and preservation of liberty, he never did solve the problem of the social sciences.

                        I’m almost, but not yet done. And I don’t claim to be right. I claim only that I can find no substantive criticism that the arguments won’t survive; and I can find vast explanatory power informing us why enlightenment modernity failed; and that I can find vast explanatory power in creating institutional solutions to correct the failures of modernity; and I can find vast explanatory power in explaining the rapid rise of the west in both the ancient and modern worlds. I can only do this because the men in the prior generations only made it half way. I can see the same ideas forming around the world in others in my generation. Consilience does its job slowly.

                        We never know the truth. We just now we have greater power over the universe than we had with the previous version of it. But whittling away, generation by generation, century by century, we incrementally suppress parasitism, we incrementally pacify mankind, we incrementally pacify the planet, we incrementally eradicate ignorance, and we narrow the distance between our ignorance and truth.

                        it’s beautiful really.

                        If it weren’t for the numbskulls along way…


                        Source date (UTC): 2015-12-09 12:55:00 UTC

                      • LIBERTARIAN POLICY IS TACTICAL AND NECESSARY BUT LIBERTARIAN CANDIDATES FOR THE

                        LIBERTARIAN POLICY IS TACTICAL AND NECESSARY BUT LIBERTARIAN CANDIDATES FOR THE PRESIDENCY ARE CAPABLE ONLY OF THREATENING THE DOMINANT OR OPPOSITION PARTY, NOT WINNING.

                        Libertarian party is dead. Current emerging strategy is that the democratic party is too dependent upon marginal groups and women and that the middle class and working class can be brought into the republican party. There is no room for a libertarian (entrepreneurial party) until we eliminate the FPTP problem in the constitution. Pending a civil war there will be no addition or subtraction of parties, only a DOMINANT PARTY and an OPPOSITION PARTY. The primary value of third parties is to threaten dominant and opposition parties if they fail to accommodate groups that early candidates successfully enfranchise. Ron Paul failed and he failed for good reasons: foreign policy, and open borders. Rand Paul fares no better.

                        At present democratic party = third worlders and single women, republican party=whites. In other words democrat=non-nuclear family, and republican=nuclear family.

                        (( REPLY WAS A GIF OF FEMALE SAYING “WHATEVER” ))

                        I thought we left gossiping, rallying, and shaming to the postmoderns. 🙂 Non arguments are for leftists and teenage girls.

                        If you want comment on your policy that’s something I support. The question isn’t whether your libertarian policy, or anyone else’s is superior to social democratic policy. Its whether it is possible for a third party under FPTP to do other than disempower either the dominant or opposition party.

                        The only possibility is to rase enough interest in one or two key policy improvements that cannot be appropriated and to force their appropriation by one of the major parties, or to force them to lose an election because of it.

                        Taxes aren’t even on radar. Immigration is.

                        But then, I’m not paid to be your advisor.

                        And, obviously whomever your paying isn’t really up to the job. Or you would get airplay.

                        Curt Doolittle

                        The Propertarian Institute

                        Kiev, Ukraine.


                        Source date (UTC): 2015-12-07 13:54:00 UTC

                      • Cleanse the Earth Of Lies and Theft – Pacification of Man

                        COMBINE SCIENCE, TRUTH, PHILOSOPHY, MORALITY, LAW, AND ECONOMICS – CLEANSE THE EART OF LIES AND THEFT, AND WE WILL BE IN PRACTICE GODS [P]hysical Science as practiced is merely incomplete. When completed, Science is a moral discipline laundering imagination from free association. Physical Science advanced faster than Social Science because in Physical, truth is advantageous – and in Social lying often is. 0) Seven Moral Warranties compete science, and unify truth, science, philosophy, morality, law, politics and economics. 1) Identity (non-conflation) 2) internal consistency (logical), 3) external consistency (correspondence) …. 4) Existential Possibility(Operationalism), 5) Morality(voluntary transfers), 6) Parsimony(limits), 7) Full Accounting… Without these seven warranties one cannot honestly promise that he adheres to his oath to forgo harm, theft and deceit. So why should we permit to live among us those who will not take and keep this oath – as we have, for thousands of years? If one cannot warranty the truthfulness of one’s speech, then why should such a person be permitted to speak? The first question of ethics is: “Why do we not kill others?” Only because productivity is superior if we cooperate. But Parasitism is Not Cooperation, it is predation. Hence if we don’t benefit from cooperation it’s foolish to practice it. And if we do not practice cooperation then the rational choice is ostracization – and if parasitic, then conquest – but not Tolerance. So if man or woman will not take and adhere to the oath, and survive the test of adhering to it, we must shun or kill them. This is truth said, truth reasoned, and truth acted. Leave no man alive who engages in theft or deception. And when the world is clean, leaving only speakers of the truth, then we shall be gods in name, actions and genes. Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev Ukraine (ps: my ongoing mission to cleanse western civilization of fallacies, and restore it to its origins as the people who speak the truth)

                      • Cleanse the Earth Of Lies and Theft – Pacification of Man

                        COMBINE SCIENCE, TRUTH, PHILOSOPHY, MORALITY, LAW, AND ECONOMICS – CLEANSE THE EART OF LIES AND THEFT, AND WE WILL BE IN PRACTICE GODS [P]hysical Science as practiced is merely incomplete. When completed, Science is a moral discipline laundering imagination from free association. Physical Science advanced faster than Social Science because in Physical, truth is advantageous – and in Social lying often is. 0) Seven Moral Warranties compete science, and unify truth, science, philosophy, morality, law, politics and economics. 1) Identity (non-conflation) 2) internal consistency (logical), 3) external consistency (correspondence) …. 4) Existential Possibility(Operationalism), 5) Morality(voluntary transfers), 6) Parsimony(limits), 7) Full Accounting… Without these seven warranties one cannot honestly promise that he adheres to his oath to forgo harm, theft and deceit. So why should we permit to live among us those who will not take and keep this oath – as we have, for thousands of years? If one cannot warranty the truthfulness of one’s speech, then why should such a person be permitted to speak? The first question of ethics is: “Why do we not kill others?” Only because productivity is superior if we cooperate. But Parasitism is Not Cooperation, it is predation. Hence if we don’t benefit from cooperation it’s foolish to practice it. And if we do not practice cooperation then the rational choice is ostracization – and if parasitic, then conquest – but not Tolerance. So if man or woman will not take and adhere to the oath, and survive the test of adhering to it, we must shun or kill them. This is truth said, truth reasoned, and truth acted. Leave no man alive who engages in theft or deception. And when the world is clean, leaving only speakers of the truth, then we shall be gods in name, actions and genes. Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev Ukraine (ps: my ongoing mission to cleanse western civilization of fallacies, and restore it to its origins as the people who speak the truth)

                      • COMBINE SCIENCE, TRUTH, PHILOSOPHY, MORALITY, LAW, AND ECONOMICS – CLEANSE THE E

                        COMBINE SCIENCE, TRUTH, PHILOSOPHY, MORALITY, LAW, AND ECONOMICS – CLEANSE THE EART OF LIES AND THEFT, AND WE WILL BE IN PRACTICE GODS

                        Physical Science as practiced is merely incomplete. Science is a moral discipline laundering imagination from free association.

                        Physical Science advanced faster than Social Science because in Physical, truth is advantageous – and in Social lying often is.

                        0) Seven Moral Warranties compete science, and unify truth, science, philosophy, morality, law, politics and economics.

                        1) Identity (non-conflation)

                        2) internal consistency (logical),

                        3) external consistency (correspondence) ….

                        4) Existential Possibility(Operationalism),

                        5) Morality(voluntary transfers),

                        6) Parsimony(limits),

                        7) Full Accounting…

                        Without these seven warranties one cannot honestly promise that he adheres to his oath to forgo harm, theft and deceit.

                        So why should we permit to live among us those who will not take and keep this oath – as we have, for thousands of years?

                        If one cannot warranty the truthfulness of one’s speech, then why should such a person be permitted to speak?

                        The first question of ethics is why do we not kill others? Only because productivity is superior if we cooperate.

                        But Parasitism is Not Cooperation it is predation. Hence if we don’t benefit from cooperation it’s foolish to practice it.

                        And if we do not practice cooperation then the rational choice is ostracization, and if parasitic, then conquest.

                        So if man or woman will not take and adhere to the oath, and survive the test of adhering to it, we must shun or kill them.

                        This is truth said, truth reasoned, and truth acted. Leave no man alive who engages in theft or deception.

                        And when the world is clean, leaving only speakers of the truth, then we shall be gods in name, actions and genes.

                        Curt Doolittle

                        The Philosophy of Aristocracy

                        The Propertarian Institute

                        Kiev Ukraine

                        (ps: my ongoing mission to cleanse western civilization of fallacies, and restore it to its origins as the people who speak the truth)


                        Source date (UTC): 2015-12-07 07:04:00 UTC

                      • THE MULTITUDE OF LUDDISMS WE CALL POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY I am beginning to see Rot

                        THE MULTITUDE OF LUDDISMS WE CALL POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY

                        I am beginning to see Rothbardian Libertinism, if not Puritanism, Socialism and Communism, as intellectually limited failures of maturity. They’re all forms of Luddism. They are failures to innovate to adapt to changes in scale.

                        Just as the 20th century thinkers failed to grasp the problem of existential possibility (operationalism and intuitionism) and of criticism over justification (morality and contract over science and truth), we failed to evolve government to adapt to the new scale.

                        Worse, we were so temporarily rich in the west due to the invention of industrial revolution, that we could afford a century of folly.

                        Markets in everything. There is no common good. There are only many theoretical goods waiting to be discovered, exploited, and abandoned in the face of newly invented goods.


                        Source date (UTC): 2015-12-07 05:15:00 UTC

                      • LETS FLIP THIS AROUND: THE WEST NEEDS RUSSIA TO SAVE IT FROM UTOPIAN DEMOCRACY J

                        LETS FLIP THIS AROUND: THE WEST NEEDS RUSSIA TO SAVE IT FROM UTOPIAN DEMOCRACY JUST AS RUSSIA NEEDED THE WEST TO SAVE IT FROM UTOPIAN COMMUNISM

                        —“The memory of the Soviets still exists in the minds of Eastern Europeans. But it would be dishonest to say that the U.S does not whip up fear of Russian expansion, so as to further maintain its political grip in Europe.”—

                        Sorry guys but I live in Ukraine, and do business in Estonia, and no one here needs ‘whipping up’ – they still remember soviets, and they recognize recent Russian actions as repeat of soviet actions. They all have relatives or friends of relatives who were starved, murdered, imprisoned, interrogated. They are painfully aware that they were european and on a European course of development and that Russian occupation hurt their cultures, their economies and their gene pools, and set them back a century of rapid development. They realize that they were Austro-hungarian and Polish-Lithuanian and that today they could live by european standars if not for Russian aggression and occupation.

                        No one needs reminding that Russia invaded Ukraine, lied about it, took over its own news media, fabricated stories daily, created an entire bureaucracy to spam the internet with Russian propaganda.

                        No one needs reminding that Russia remains an undeveloped resource economy, where the secret police manage the drug trade, and where the Kremlin uses its alliance with the Chechens to manage internal security – at great peril to Russian people. And that Moscow is now as full of muslims and third world peoples as any western city and for the same reason: real estate greed at the expense of the ordinary people. In a pattern that effects the entire world: Barbarians go to Moscow, the Russian Muscovites are displaced, and the money is sent to London where the British are displaced by the same means. They are driven out of London, leaving only the lower class third world Immigrants and empty flats owned by Russian politicians and business men.

                        No one needs reminding that the United States has been selling a false utopia as defense against the disaster of Russian-driven world communism, just like the communists were selling a false utopia as a false alternative to consumer capitalism.

                        No one needs reminding that it was the Russian state-sponsored Frankfurt School that paid for the conversion of american intellectuals to pseudoscience, nor the expurgation of jews from Europe and Russia that sent them to america where they spread their marxist, socialist, and Frankfurtian pseudoscience through the university, media, and entertainment business.

                        No one needs reminding that the anglos were mistaken to conquer their cousins in Germany, and in doing so destroying western civilization’s basis in aristocracy. Nor that the American occupation of Europe was necessary only because of the Soviet occupation of Europe. Or that the American occupation is now the origin of european political weakness and social democratic overspending, and immigration. Nor that the entire western military model had adopted to the eventual inclusion of Russia just as Gorbachev had intended, and that the entire western state had pivoted to the emerging threats in the pacific and Asia instead. Nor that Putin’s panic over the threat of the spread of the Ukrainian revolution to Moscow and St Petersburg caused him to invade Ukraine and capture Crimea rather than doing the mature and wise thing and simply telling Ukraine (and the States and NATO) that they would need to ‘lease’ Crimea and the eastern territories for 99 years in exchange for a large discount on gas because it was of strategic military and industrial importance that the Russian state could not be without and still secure her borders, industry, and trade.

                        No one needs reminding that the entire purpose of the postwar era has been to eliminate expansion and to force nations to direct their industrial energies to human rights and internal economic development rather than agrarian era territorial and tax expansion. Nor that it was Russia who broke this postwar agreement, and in doing so told the world that the future is one in which nuclear weapons are the only means by which states can guarantee their borders. Now, instead of eliminating weapons pointed at Moscow, and trusting NATO for defense, the entirety of Eastern Europe desires nuclear weapons and the abandonment of NATO for defense. NATO is a paper tiger that acts as a political system protecting world trade and nothing more. A dozen small countries with weapons pointed at heavily centralized Russia is not an increase in security for Russians. It is asking for an accident.

                        The west needs three things for Russia to lead the Circumpolar Peoples:

                        1) Russians must eliminate endemic corruption in all walks of life, continue to incrementally build rule of law, and to slowly construct an economy not entirely dependent upon resource revenue, bribery, and graft to create a political, social and economic order.

                        2) Russians must accept and apologize for the damage that they have done to Europe and the world in the Mongolian, Czarist, and Soviet Eras – it was much worse than the nazis ever dreamed of doing. After Mao’s efforts it is the worst most murderous campaign in recorded history, second only to the plagues, the Mongolian expansion, and the Muslim invasions of civilization.

                        3) Russians must stop their universal lying about their own past (Muscovites killed the Rus, they are not Rus) and about what they do today, and simply tell the truth: the Enlightenment Project of Universal Participation has been a catastrophic failure, everywhere it has been tried. Authoritarianism is not the answer, but neither is democracy: which is merely communism by slower means.

                        Russians are now largely ‘right’. So stop lying and deceiving – despite the fact that lying, deceit, and corruption and low trust are the markers of Russian society. If you are right then merely speak the truth. The truth is enough. All Russians need to do to rule is to speak truthfully.

                        Because it is the West that is living a lie they believe now, just as Russians lived the lie of communism that they believed in the past. The fact that both Russians and westerners believed lies created by the Jews is something that we should both consider deeply: why were we both susceptible to utopian authoritarian lies by Marx, Lenin and Stalin? And why were we susceptible to utopian egalitarian lies of the neo-puritans and postmodernists? The reason is the First Great Lie we were susceptible to: religion: christianity, judaism, and islam. These were the first great lies. And the pseudosciences of Marxism, Socialism, Libertarianism, and Neo-Conserviatism the Second Great Lies.

                        When all the time the only truth that existed was our Warrior Heroism that created Aristotelian Science, Oath, Testimony, Jury, Property and Rule of Law. This is our origin as indo-europeans warriors from the black sea. This is our origin of sun worshippers using the wheel, bronze, and horse.

                        We tried hard to save you from false god of Communism. We need Russians to try hard to save us from the false god of Utopian Democracy.

                        WE NEED YOU. WE NEED YOU TO SAVE US. With Truth, Honor, Strength, and Courage. WE CANNOT SAVE OURSELVES any more than you could save yourselves from communism. WE NEED YOU TO SAVE US.

                        But we need you armed with Truth and Russian Pragmatism, Russian Intolerance, and our shared Indo-european heroism. Not Mongol, Czarist, Soviet Propaganda and Lies.

                        We should be ruling this world, not fighting over it.

                        Curt Doolittle

                        The Propertarian Institute

                        Kiev


                        Source date (UTC): 2015-12-07 04:46:00 UTC