Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • “Q: What exactly is preventing you from moving to France?”– Promoting the commo

    –“Q: What exactly is preventing you from moving to France?”–

    Promoting the common illusion that the nice parts of Paris where the millionaires live, and the tourists spend their drachmas, is anything to do with the absolute slums that surround the isle de france like an encampment, and the absolutely depressing, poor, and unsafe disasters of the big cities (without even touching the smaller ones): Toulouse, Rennes, Lille, Lyon, Grenoble, Nice (OMG), Nantes, Marseille (Marseille has a crime rate five times higher than most other cities in France including a gun-related fatality approximately every four days (2.83 gun deaths per 100,000 residents). The city has around 30 homicides per year and 40% youth unemployment, which results in high levels of property and petty thefts.

    (a) Islamization, political unrest, and an oblivious government.
    (b) Riots, Strikes, Blockades, and “everything on fire” nights.
    (c) multiple cities with no go zones
    (d) relative hostility to entrepreneurship.
    (e) unbearable business regulations.
    (f) intolerable taxes.
    (g) the offensive authoritarian arrogance of the bureaucracy.

    If you’re a commoner france is great. If you’re competent and ambitious then there is no alternative to the anglosphere, with the american system simply unparalleled.

    When the French government approached me about opening a location in france they acknowledged all their issues – they didn’t even deny it – but they stated that they still needed to work on bringing business and particularly technology entrepreneurship to france. To which I responded – you cannot create a technology company that cannot turnover highly paid employees at will. The technolgoy marketplace requries continuous talent rotation that mirrors that “noise” of tech moving through the businesses and institutions in the economy.

    I’m met with Glazed eyes. ๐Ÿ™‚

    So yeah.

    Reply addressees: @Culture_Crit

    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-13 20:16:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1746264919601799168

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1746181683701813557

  • Silly Naive Western Conservative Lower Classes Please stop behaving as a naive i

    Silly Naive Western Conservative Lower Classes
    Please stop behaving as a naive ignorant western privileged nitwit. ๐Ÿ˜‰ The enemy refers to you as the Russian equivalent of ‘suckers’ by the way because you’re so childishly idealistic regarding human nature – and regarding the world as it is. In islam they refer to you as the arabic equivalent of ‘victims’ because you’re so naive that you’re easily taken advantage of. In fact, you don’t realize it, but they’re both also calling you effeminate by implication.
    The world doesn’t care about your naive kindergarden western morals. The rest of the world consists of people who must act practically, without your delusions, with serious problems and serious scarcity in an environment of low trust.
    Your naivety isn’t transmissible to other cultures. So when you visit or reside in other countries, then do as they do or leave. Else you will pay for it, And the lower trust the culture the more severely you will pay for it.
    Why? You dont’ matter. The folly that you matter is part of the western fantasy indoctrination – it has nothing to do with reality. It is a religious matter, not a real one.

    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-13 19:07:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1746247553966862336

  • Silly Naive Western Conservative Lower Classes Please stop behaving as a naive i

    Silly Naive Western Conservative Lower Classes
    Please stop behaving as a naive ignorant western privileged nitwit. ๐Ÿ˜‰ The enemy refers to you as the Russian equivalent of ‘suckers’ by the way because you’re so childishly idealistic regarding human nature, and the world as it is. In islam they refer to you as the arabic equivalent of ‘victims’ because you’re so naive that you’re easily taken advantage of. In fact, you don’t realize it, but they’re both also calling you effeminate by implication.
    The world doesn’t care about your naive kindergarden western morals. The rest of the world consists of people who must act practically, without your delusions, with serious problems and serious scarcity in an environment of low trust.
    Your naivety isn’t transmissible to other cultures. So when you visit or reside in other countries, then do as they do or leave. Else you will pay for it, And the lower trust the culture the more severely you will pay for it.
    Why? You dont’ matter. The folly that you matter is part of the western fantasy indoctrination – it has nothing to do with reality. It is a religious matter, not a real one.

    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-13 19:07:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1746238532186722305

  • Most of us live in the privilege of western high trust societies that are WEIRD

    Most of us live in the privilege of western high trust societies that are WEIRD (western, educated, industrial, rich, and democratic) and we assume this is normal and not weird. The idea that you can live in another country and carry around your high minded privilge as if it’s a universal moral code is a symbol of ignorance of the world and mankind in general. The west developed these traditions (and genes) over five thousand years. They are not universal.

    Eastern europe and russia in particular are the edge of civilization, and they were centuries behind the rest of europe in their development, They do not share your utopian tolerance. They favor order and are intolerant of its absence – because they have too much experience without it. And they live in low trust societies fully corruption both private and public. In that environment you the ‘grace’ that CRP was show repeatedly, he abused repeatedly. He was no journalist. He was a propagandists agitating for an enemy while an expat alien resident in a country at war. He’s lucky they didn’t just haul him off and have him shot,

    I’ve been with Azov and Praavy sektor just after they killed Russians at night. It’s a miracle Azov didn’t dispose of him. I’m aware that they considered it. So was CRP. But he had protection because he was a tacit american. And they gave him that protection over and over again but he kept abusing it.

    Reply addressees: @MeMawChatterBox @TuckerCarlson

    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-13 02:11:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745992035524288512

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745974631117258855

  • THE ABRAHMIC RELIGIONS, FREE WILL, AGENCY, AND RESPONSIBILITY. –“Outside of the

    THE ABRAHMIC RELIGIONS, FREE WILL, AGENCY, AND RESPONSIBILITY.
    –“Outside of the magical thinking of philosophers, the term free will corresponds to and consists of agency and responsibility. Free will means you, as an individual, must decide what is moral and immoral – and you will be held accountable as an in individual if you choose wrongly. You do not get to appeal to any authority, whether of man of god, to say you were just doing what he told you and aren’t responsible.

    Thus, our european free will is a total anathema to Abrahamism – all versions of abrahamic religion being seductive by enabling evasion of responsibility, far more than any false promise of freedom from laws of nature.

    I’d suggest you can read the Torah and Koran+Hadith as Jews and Muslims selling their free will to the devil Yahweh/Allah and fully submit to his commandments in exchange for his promise wealth (jews), power(muslims) and submission of all the other nations in the world. And it’s working.”– Martin Stepan

    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-11 21:32:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745559447903055872

  • WHY WE SENSE THE UNIVERSE SIMILARLY BUT EXPERIENCE IT DIFFERENTLY: The Dimension

    WHY WE SENSE THE UNIVERSE SIMILARLY BUT EXPERIENCE IT DIFFERENTLY:
    The Dimensions that Determine the Biases in Our Brains

    –“Q:Curt: Do you make distinction between phenomena and noumena? Do you agree with Kant in the way that we can’t ever have a total comprehension of reality?”–

    The first problem with the question is the word ‘we’.
    Humans demonstrate at least the following Dimensions of the mind:
    1. Masculine systematizing over time and scale (predator) vs feminine Empathizing in time absent scale (prey).
    2. The degree of dominance in that masculine compartmental (autistic) vs Feminine integrated (psychotic)
    3. Where in the back-to-front organization of the brain the individual is dominant (sensory, physical, social, rational, empirical)
    4. The degree of disambiguation between the dream, experience, imagination, observation, and conscious states.
    5. The Bias in processing assets (morality) from the feminine limited, to ascendent male less limited, to the dominant male complete.
    6. The Bias in Processing Information (before, during, after) or what we test (personality) as the big five, intelligence, and sex.
    7. The degree of neotenic evolution in the genome – rate of limited adaptivity in maturity vs continued adaptivity in neoteny.
    8. The degree of success in in-utero and first two years of development (genetics) especially in neural network formation.
    9. Age (obviously) especially the behavioral adaptivity prior to puberty, the intersexual adaptivity during and right after, and the declining intersexual adaptation after maturity.
    10. Experience – including socialization, education, training.
    11. Accumulated Trauma or Damage
    (I’m missing one I think, but i’ll add it later if it comes to me) ๐Ÿ˜‰

    The second problem is that Kant wasn’t a neuroscientist and we know these things today the he didn’t and couldn’t know, and was almost entirely wrong about.

    1)by the 10+ criteria abobve, some of us live in a dream state and some of us live in extraordinarly accurate reality. THe reason is that while our brains are quite exceptional at disambiguating senses into a three dimensional model of the world we can act in, that information is then used to predict future possibiliities, value them, and suggest them to us as intuition.

    So if some of us live in near dream states and some in cold hard reality and some of us somewhere in between, then the problem is the concept of ‘we’. Some of us grasp the world very clearly and some of us living stories from our imaginations or impulses projected on top of that world without being able to tell much of the difference, which, as we see in both schizophrenia and psychosis is a rather obvious result of the extremes.

    In other words, if nothing goes wrong, then we see the world very much as it is for the purpose of action at human scale. What we imagine is something very different. And the worse you are at imagining, and the more dream state you’re in along with it, the less of theh world you really live in and th emore of the fantasy world you live in.

    This is why we can’t make everyone agree. Because while the combination of our ability to observe, disambiguate and negavate space and time, is marginally indifferent, our use of langauge, which of necessity must consist of a protocol across minds of such different experiencee, then fools us into thing we share the same interpretations of the world that we sense and percieve.

    So a) philosophers are irrelevant in every possible way, b) we see the world as it is, c) we imagine what it means to us differently.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @partymember55

    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-11 01:39:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745259180078886912

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745250718905155637

  • The most painful aspect of recognizing the failure of mass via-positiva democrac

    The most painful aspect of recognizing the failure of mass via-positiva democracy, isn’t just women’s incapacity for it, or even a third of men’s incapacity for it, but that a natural aristocracy, meaning those men willing AND able to bear the responsibilty for the suppression of irreciprocity, and as a consequence the institutionalization of individual responsibiilty for private and common that results from it, but that there are, at most, ten percent of us who are so capable – and those ten percent who are capable must still be identified and trained for it. The germanics gave us the foundation but the Anglos alone gave us the fruits of modernity – and we failed by discounting the aristocracy instead of moderating their role and enabling the rotation necessary and possible with the new economic opportunity our science and technology have given us. However, without our (my) work on the natural law (really, the science of decidability, and within that science the science of cooperation, and with that science applied to law we can produce a science of government more accurate and more ersiliant and more durable than the longest living governments in the world – the anglosphere.

    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-11 01:15:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745252949440258048

  • Funny. Young male nitwits calling me ‘spineless’ because, while surrounded by ar

    Funny. Young male nitwits calling me ‘spineless’ because, while surrounded by armed men ready and willing, and them by army of police and armored cars ready to act against them, I used humor and wisdom to prevent a catastrophe that would presage the retaliation on Jan6th – when in fact any doctor will easily explain that I have an unhealthy insensitivity to pain and any psychologist an even more unhealthy lack of fear. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    I have spent too little time with the peasantry and while I feel noblesse oblige to protect and defend them – even from themselves, that doesn’t mean they are more than children in abilty disposition and agency. And while it is rather easy to use maternal manipulation to organize the infantilize left, it’s nearly impossible to use masculine reason to mobilize the adolescent right.

    I would prefer to live my life in business and intellectual labors without garnering an public attention. I don’t desire it, I don’t like it, and I’m unfit for it. That said, we must all do our moral duty when moral duty calls. And for all my failings that duty and loyalty to my people I will not surrender even if it takes my life.

    Nor should any man who claims he is moral.

    -Cheers

    PS: The gifts of anglo autism are endless. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-10 16:42:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745124075310034944

  • The Brutal Science of Our Natural Law Formulation Where the previous milennias a

    The Brutal Science of Our Natural Law Formulation

    Where the previous milennias asked this question:
    –“To summarize: Classical natural law theory can be understood as a commitment to the following two claims: (1) Moral validity is a logically necessary condition for legal validityโ€”an unjust or immoral law being no law at all; and (2) The moral order is a part of the natural order-moral duties being in some sense โ€read off” from essences or purposes ๏ฌxed (perhaps by God) in nature.”–

    Instead, our construction is quite simple:
    The only reason for I and mine not to kill you and take your Stuff, is if there is more utility than doing so. And the only means of obtaining that utility is cooperation. And the terms of that cooperation are reciprocal insurance of self determination by self determined means in the form of sovereignty in demonstrated interest and reciprocity in display word and deed. Only then does a ‘we’ exist, instead of an ‘I’. In other worse, this is the means by which commons are produced, and commons are a multiplier, and it is commons that defend us against the dark forces of time, nature, man, and ignorance.

    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-10 07:34:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744986131836403712

  • Why Islam vs Christianity? This series of passages is reducible to the incapacit

    Why Islam vs Christianity?
    This series of passages is reducible to the incapacity of the south eurasian peoples to grasp abstractions – whether egyptian stagnation, mesopotamian, levantine, arab, or the eventual muslim. Even the minds of the persians could not defeat the incapacity of the minds of their neighbors.

    –“Like the dogs Heraclitus mentioned in one of his aphorisms, the Arabs barked at what they did not understand.”–

    Now, if we grasp that (a) a population’s strategy, metaphysics, myths, rituals, grammars (logics), traditions, values, norms, and habits must satisfy the median of the distribution given that two thirds of the population is only capable of such limits, and far more are capable of nothing but imitation at the bottom. And (b) logical facility degrades rapidly under 105, especially in a population where the IQ is 83, combined with tribalism and illiteracy. Of course they are not able to grasp and institutionalize abstractions without high investment parenting and high investment education – and even then, the percentage of the population capable of such reasoning is limted in relation to the rest.

    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-09 22:05:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744842889463574528