Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • DEAR LIBERTARIANS: WELCOME TO THE REAL. You are currently in the heavy-resistanc

    DEAR LIBERTARIANS: WELCOME TO THE REAL.

    You are currently in the heavy-resistance phase, as the entire cosmopolitan program comes crashing down, including the marxist-postmodern, libertine-libertarian, and neo-conservative, as well as the social democratic and classical liberal. That is because all the enlightenment views of man and all the enlightenment counter-reactions against the progress of the scientific method (criticism) by various methods of justification(justificationism) have been demonstrated to be false.

    Man was not oppressed by aristocracy. He was a beast that a small minority of gifted martial aristocrats domesticated from animal, to slave, to serf, to freeman, to citizen resulting in the diminution of the lower and increase in the middle and upper middle classes through reproductive suppression, war, starvation, and aggressive hanging.

    Man is a rational actor for whom cooperation is possible and generally superior choice. But at all times he chooses moral or immoral action by little more than either habit or accounting of consequences.

    And as such we invented the natural common law of reciprocity since no matter how complex our social orders, all conflicts over demonstrated investments are decidable by tests of reciprocity.

    There is but one epistemological method and that is the the market for competition for consistency between the dimensions, and the market for competition for consistent application in reality.

    And because of that competition, both truth and lie can survive through continuous innovation. If only because it is cheaper to produce deception than truth. And the most powerful incentive to produce truth is to defeat ignorance, falsehood and deceit.

    Cheers.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-17 21:19:00 UTC

  • GRADUATE COURSE IN EPISTEMOLOGY – CLASS TWO – BOOM! (continuing with testimonial

    GRADUATE COURSE IN EPISTEMOLOGY – CLASS TWO – BOOM!

    (continuing with testimonialism’s synthesis of science, philosophy, morality and law)

    —“Denying apriorism whilst simultaneously making a priori truth claims = hopelessly confused.”—

    Actually, ah, but that’s not what I did, right? I deflated Kant to unite science, philosophy, morality and law and the techniques of deceptive argument by claims of distinctions without a difference that were used by the marxists-postmodernists, rothbardians and straussian neocons. (Which is what others will tell you.)

    (In other words, I ‘hardened’ philosophy by uniting it with science and law.)

    I said:

    – That analytic truth(thought), ideal truth(words), “testimonial truth”or existentially possible truth(actions) describe a spectrum of increasing differences in information between the statement and reality.

    – That all a priori statements are special cases of the single theoretical method that encompasses all of conceivable and actionable reality.

    – That Reality consists of a number of actionable dimensions, and that the various statements of a priori reasoning reflected the most simple of those dimensions.

    – That we can test each dimension of reality for consistency.

    – That any test of any dimension consistency requires appealing to the test of at least the next dimension, and that any test of reality requires appealing to the full set of dimensions of reality.

    – That survival of each dimensional test does not determine that the statement is true, but that it is non false within the scope of the limits defined.

    – That because of causal density, the application of economic theories can describe trends but not cases.

    – That we cannot know a subset of cases will follow the general rule without investigation.

    – That all not only can all cases not be determined, or not all trends be observable, but that all economic phenomenon cannot be and have not been discovered by deduction but by empirical observation (ie: sticky prices), because much economic phenomenon is beyond our perceptions without measurements.

    – That the predictability of economic phenomenon is (likely) determined by symmetries within intermediary states (in math “lie groups”) and that these are not deducible without empirical observation due to the limits of the human mind to model. But that once modeled will be understandable by the human mind.

    – That this epistemological method will apply even with the addition of new dimensions (which is the likely consequence of the current mathematical and physical investigation into symmetries. Symmetries we cannot conceive of. But once observed we can operationally explain.

    OR AS POPPER TOLD US:

    All knowledge of the world is temporal and contingent. All scientific investigation is social and moral.

    OR AS I’M STATING MORE COMPLETELY

    All knowledge of the world is temporal and contingent, and demand for completeness of truth claims is in fact nothing but demand for warranty of due diligence given the the externalities of the display, speech or action.

    THE LAW

    The ‘Law’ of the Analytic(thought), Ideal(word), Real(action), Reasonable(choice), Moral(reciprocal):

    – Analytic: i can or cannot think that.

    – Ideal:I think I can or cannot say that.

    – Real:I claim I can or cannot do that.

    – Reasonable: I can or cannot but would or would not do that.

    – Moral: I would or would not do that, but I should or should not do that.

    HOW CAN WE REDUCE THIS TO GENERAL RULES?

    (a) All non trivial statements about the reality require prior experience.

    (b) All non trivial propositions are contingent.

    (c) All non trivial tests of dimensional consistency are incomplete

    (d) These statements are all contingent.

    (e) All statements we know how to make are contingent, because all knowledge is contingent.

    (f) All display, speech, action, and externality

    CLOSING

    In other words, I eliminated the special pleading intended by, and made possible by kant by the mandation of ignorance, as a resistance against the tide of science. Which is why Rothbard used rationalism, just as abrahamic religious dogma was used: to place artificial constraints on our actions by placing artificial constraints on our reason.

    FWIW

    I use people like you as educational foils. Because while I understand that these advances are probably too difficult for you, they are not too difficult for everyone, and these conversations function as advertising and marketing by which I can locate those who CAN understand such things (likely because of a combination of education and intelligence). And what we have come to understand over the past few years, is that one generally must have an understanding of the methods of the sciences as well as economics, if not learned from computer science the difference between mathematics (arithmetic operations), logic (set operations), programming (algorithmic operations). The reason being, that algorithmic operations must be informationally complete, and training the human mind to think by decidability (informational sufficiency) rather than choice (informational possibility) is rather challenging.

    THUS ENDETH THE LESSON.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-17 20:07:00 UTC

  • PRIVATE SCHOOLS (NEIGHBORHOODS) PREVENT BADS — “The critical problem with priv

    PRIVATE SCHOOLS (NEIGHBORHOODS) PREVENT BADS

    — “The critical problem with private schools, is that you admit intelligent kids but how have you changed them?”— Grant Wiggin (Education Author)

    Well this presumes a few falsehoods.

    1) It isn’t clear at all that we can improve critical thinking skills. We can only prevent the adoption of bad habits.

    2) It isn’t clear that you can improve a child’s future through education, you can only prevent something from going wrong if you don’t educate him or her.

    In other words, despite all objections to the contrary: IQ, Conscientiousness(Industriousness), and Stability(neuroticism), determine the intellectual capacity of your child, and his or her lifetime potential. Your job is to give him or her the same tools as everyone else, while doing as little damage as possible.

    3) Public schools, at least since the relaxation of discipline in the 1960’s, produce a lot of environmental ‘bads’. In particular the reduction of physical movement, exercise, and competition.

    4) So the purpose of private schools is not to produce any particular good, but to prevent the many, many, BAD things that are a byproduct of the public education system.

    The same is true for schools, neighborhoods, cities, and nations: the problem is not in producing goods. It is in eliminating bads. And the bads are quite easy to find: they’re the people who do bad things.

    Among these people are the majority of leftists who want to outsource the cost for one another’s lack of agency rather than rid the neighborhood, school, polity, and nation of those who lack it.

    This is the fundamental difference between aristocracy and priesthood: The action/aristocratic reduction of the underclasses and the upward redistribution of aggregate reproduction empowering their profiting from advancing meritocracy, and the gossiping/priestly-casts reduction of the middle classes and downward redistribution of production empowering their profiting from advancing equalitarianism.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-16 13:19:00 UTC

  • It is rational to take drugs, alcohol, cigarettes, fried food, sugar, and lethar

    It is rational to take drugs, alcohol, cigarettes, fried food, sugar, and lethargy. It is rational to take gifts, hand outs, subsidies, rents, and extortions. It’s rational to choose myth over literature, literature over history, history over philosophy, philosophy over law, law over engineering, engineering over science, and science over mathematics. It is rational to tell white lies, grey lies, black lies, and to evil lies. It is rational to beg, steal, rape, murder, plunder, and war.

    So in the choice to believe in god or gods, it is counter intuitive to choose gods. In the choice to choose gods or science it is counter intuitive to choose science. in the choice between narrative and calculation it is counter intuitive to choose calculation. In the choice between lie and truth it is counter intuitive to choose truth.

    When engaged in deception of the self or others it is rational to state the non-demonstrable rather than the demonstrable.

    Pascal’s wager is inaccurate. “It is only rational to hedge a belief in gods if one thinks and acts as if none exists.”

    The purpose of religion is anti-social: to prevent you from reason. Only a demon would demand and command as Jehovah.

    —“Live a good life. If there are gods and they are just, then they will not care how devout you have been, but will welcome you based on the virtues you have lived by. If there are gods, but unjust, then you should not want to worship them. If there are no gods, then you will be gone, but will have lived a noble life that will live on in the memories of your loved ones.”— Aurelius (a Stoic)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-16 12:07:00 UTC

  • “CAN WE END THE USE OF LITERATURE FOR SUBVERSION OF THE WEST?”— Daniel Gurpide

    —“CAN WE END THE USE OF LITERATURE FOR SUBVERSION OF THE WEST?”— Daniel Gurpide

    WHEREAS

    I agree that the (abrahamist’s) strategy was to ally three underclasses (through women in particular), to communism as a means of defeating the aristocracy.

    Furthermore, I agree with the theory that the purpose for the licensing of christianity and the invention of the church was to defeat the “Old” aristocracy.

    And I think we can agree that Marxism/Communism/Postmodernism, are the modern version of the attack on the aristocracy, by replacing a supernatural cult’s promise of afterlife with a pseudoscientific cult’s promise of utopia within one’s lifetime.

    ASSERTION

    We can only kill a virus by killing its hosts. That seems to be out of the question – although not for the muslims it isn’t.

    We can regulate the spread of a virus(law). We can innoculate against the virus. (education). And these actions raise the cost of replication of the virus. To the point where it may live on, but not spread, because it can find no hosts.

    Now, just as we can operationalize language, by limiting it to warranty of due diligence, we can to the same for plots.

    Why? Because there is no difference between a literary recipes and legal recipes.

    For example, there is but one monomyth plot > so many archetypes > so many subplots (variations), and so many virtues and vices(sins). And we know that that hierarch refers to transcendence(learning), psychological portfolios, methods of resistance to transcendence, and an accounting of those changes virtues, vices. So we can in fact analyze any such literature. The evolution of post-literary persuasion will be through ‘harmonics’, which is a series of ‘reports’ the synthesis of whcy by any individual will feed a narrative. We can defend against this also by the same means.

    our primary problem is that we are denied the protection of the courts, and that church and state manage the commons rather than the MARKET manages the informational commons.

    So it is just as possible to perform a propertarian analysis of a piece of literature, no matter how subtle as it is to perform a propertarian analysis of advertisement, propaganda, or proposed law.

    The postmodern literary attempt was to circumvent the monomyth by creating little windows into the lives of people who were not heroic. THe postmodern and marxist artistic attempt was to circumvent the monomyth by removing narrative and relying entirely on design, and even then, anti-heroic design.

    And they do this under the auspices that the army common people fight in, and the economy common people labor in, and the families common people struggle with, are not in fact empirically better than they would be under non heroic civilizations that persist in ignorance and poverty. After all, the primary beneficiaries of consumer capitalism have not been the upper middle and upper classes. We have lost our status under capitalism to the middle and working classes. And we don’t like it very much.

    REVERSAL

    But we must remember that just as we must preserve cheaters in the gene pool to insure we retain defense against cheaters, we must preserve deceptions in the informational pool in order to preserve defense against deceptions.

    The northern europeans developed high trust to an extent where it was a fault. It was exploited. So it is not so much that we want to eliminate it as evolve in parrallel to it so that we preserve the ability to defeat it.

    I am attracted to the same general approach as the chinese: “these people are inferior’ but our solidarity is somewhat dependent upon their inferiority”

    in other words, it may be that we just need to create a wall and continuously defend against them otherwise there is no reason for the very heroism that has driven us despite our small numbers, to transcend the beast man.

    FORWARD

    I think this conversation would be very fruitful if you and I were to have it in a larger forum. Because this is the central question.

    I find nothing in middle eastern abrahamism that is good, that is not in pagan europeanism. I find no techniques in the world disciplines that are not in stoicism (action). And I find frightening parallels between the Roman authors of 0-100AD and the authors of 1880-1929.

    We have lost almost a century. The question is, can we save ourselves from what appears to be a certain dark age. Because while it is one thing to occupy and defeat a high trust people, once that high trust people, and their high trust are gone, it does not appear that other than levantine chaos and poverty remain.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-15 10:23:00 UTC

  • THE ONLY CULT YOU NEED OR WANT IS THE OATH OF THE INITIATIC BROTHERHOOD OF WARRI

    THE ONLY CULT YOU NEED OR WANT IS THE OATH OF THE INITIATIC BROTHERHOOD OF WARRIORS

    Men.

    Your only western ‘cult’ is the oath of the militia: the brotherhood of warriors. This cult depends upon reciprocity. And reciprocity upon truth, trust, sovereignty, contract(oath).

    If you don’t understand what I am doing, it is this: I am denying you the comforting lies that you, your family, your kin, your nation, your race can survive under any other cult. That there is any means of survival and transcendence of you, your people, and your cult other than the cult of the militia.

    This cult is not a fantasy. Not an ideal. Not a utopia. You must make oaths to real men, with real flaws, and choose leaders from real men with real flaws. You must hold to your oath despite the flaws of real men, and follow orders from the flawed men who we choose as our leaders. You must take real risks. Develop real skills. Perform real work. Fight real wars. Transform real nature.

    All other cults in this world were developed to defeat your cult of warriors from without and within. From enemies, from our underclasses, from our women. Every single one. Organized religion was born to oppose us. To defeat us. And to exterminate us.

    And if you have invested in one of those cults that evolved for the single purpose of your defeat, it is my purpose to cleanse you of it. To cure you of the infection that you chose, or you inherited, or that was imposed upon you.

    We are all imperfect. We are all flawed. We are all unequal. We all must compromise. We all must face and overcome our weaknesses. But through our oath to one another we grant one another reciprocal insurance of sovereignty, and insure that sovereignty by through, word, and deed.

    Now we may invoke the honor of our own, of our fathers, of our ancestors, of a common hero, or that embodiment of our heroes across the ages in fictional gods. But this tells us nothing but the age of our oath, and the number and time scale of those who we give our oath to – living or dead.

    Everything uniquely good in the Western man and his civilization was present three thousand five hundred years ago. Every advancement of the west was made under that oath. Every discovery, innovation, advancement the consequence of that oath – and nothing more.

    We are men. We are the gods-in-making. And we alone have found the means of transcendence from beast, to man, to god: Truth, Oath, Sovereignty, and the extension of kinship love to our brothers in arms. And together, against the forces of man, woman, beast, and nature, we fight a war of transcendence. And the honor of having made our contribution to doing so.

    So, brothers, will we take up our arms, and save ourselves, our families, our kin, our tribes, our nations, and the transcendence of man from the Third Conquest of the West, or will we fall victim to the cults that have been the source of each dark age, each conquest, each gradual reduction of our realm?

    Any man who will fight with me shall be my brother.

    And as brothers we will restore our lands, restore our people, restore our civilization, and return to the transcendence of man, and the fulfillment of our chosen destiny as as gods.

    There is no higher purpose available to man. Available to our people, your kin, your family, nor available to you.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-15 10:18:00 UTC

  • THE REAL POLITICAL INNOVATION OF CHRISTIANITY by Daniel Gurpide I think that the

    THE REAL POLITICAL INNOVATION OF CHRISTIANITY

    by Daniel Gurpide

    I think that the real political innovation of Christianity, as opposed to Judaism, was the invention of Communism (private property is theft and commerce, its instrument), unifying three groups of people -who had been dispersed till then- by promising that the last shall be the first- 1/the idiots (“Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven”)+ 2/ the poor (“blessed are those who hunger and thirst…”) + 3/the criminal (“blessed are those who are persecuted…”) and offering them a charismatic leadership (the Messiah who will bring the Kingdom of Heaven).

    This formula has been re-enacted since then whenever there has been prosperity to be coveted (Roman Empire, Renaissance, Industrial Revolution) and a powerful instrument to transmit the message has been literature: imagine the damage done by the novels of Charles Dickens or Victor Hugo. Les Misérables has been one of the biggest successes of popular culture, its author became rich by inventing a story based on falsehood, exaggeration, distortion, and sentimentalism.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-15 09:32:00 UTC

  • LIBERTARIANISM IS DEAD. ONLY SOVEREIGNTY REMAINS. I mean. Seriously. I killed of

    LIBERTARIANISM IS DEAD. ONLY SOVEREIGNTY REMAINS.

    I mean. Seriously. I killed off the work of Mises, Rothbard, Hoppe, and all variations thereof – except for hoppe’s use of strict construction from property rights which I’ve merely extended. It’s intellectually dead.

    But like all cults it is very hard to kill a malinvestment, because we will cling to the identity and self image we purchased with our malinvestments. So like all false theories, libertarianism will likely die with its *mal-investors*.

    Thankfully there are intellectually honest people left who are more concerned with obtaining a condition of liberty via Sovereignty than they are with preserving malinvestments in a failed theory.

    Thankfully there are always new generations looking for answers that are less false than the answers of the previous generation (just as there those opponents of the truth looking for those more false.)

    What we should look for is legions of ‘libertarians’ who say ‘well that’s what I meant all along’ and some other way to change while preserving their prior investment.

    We already attract the intellectually honest, and scientific rather than justificationary crowd.

    And our function over the next year is to deny ‘neighbors’ who are potential allies the comfort of their self deceptions.

    Through continuous removal of falsehood only truth will remain.

    That truth is quite simple: we will either, as a permanent minority of moral men, use organized violence to obtain a condition of sovereignty in fact, or we will have neither sovereignty, liberty, or freedom – but expansion of serfdom and slavery in all its forms: pseudoscientific, pseudo-rational, supernatural, debt slavery, legislative slavery, and redistributive slavery.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-12 10:47:00 UTC

  • SOVEREIGNTY: WE ARE VASTLY OUTNUMBERED We are vastly out numbered, so we have to

    SOVEREIGNTY: WE ARE VASTLY OUTNUMBERED

    We are vastly out numbered, so we have to use organized violence to suppress all parasitism in order that we preserve our sovereignty. And we have to collect fees for our services because it is a specialized craft.

    The secret of the west’s success is that sovereignty and reciprocity produce rule of natural law, which produces markets from which we can extract fees for to pay for our specialization in all of the above.

    Hence each home, manor, city state, nation consists of a set of markets which preserve our sovereignty – by which a minority can defeat all opponents through more rapid adaptation than any alternative human order.

    It just so happens that this is the most moral occupation ever invented by mankind. And this occupation has been the cause of lifting mankind out of superstition, ignorance, poverty, disease, labor, and tyranny.

    MORAL MEN ARE ALWAYS VASTLY OUTNUMBERED.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-12 09:10:00 UTC

  • THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EFFEMINACY AND ROTHBARDIANISM What libertarians hold to

    THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EFFEMINACY AND ROTHBARDIANISM

    What libertarians hold to is that each is the judge of morality rather than external conditions that determine it regardless of what they think.

    What they are doing and what is appealing to ‘libertarians’ (whether it is a genetic, developmental, or cognitive deficiency – I assume that like in my case it is an erroneous dependence on introspection) is to ***apply the feminine strategy of demanding her approval rather than preventing the conflict between men.***

    It took me a long time to understand this was the cause. And I didn’t like it because it is my intuition as well, but once I understood that ***we care about women’s cooperation so that we buy opportunities for sex and affection, and to prevent their gossip. But no one gives a damn about the approval of beta males, and their gossip, so it just doesn’t matter what beta males think. Men don’t seek approval of other men, they seek to avoid the retaliation of other men.***

    I could write a book on this subject. Haidt has the data. The data is obvious. All we would need to do is some genetic testing on self identified libertarians. And we would find very consistent results.

    There is a very great difference between granting one another sovereignty and reciprocal defense out of loyalty, and running around virtue signaling that one is unwilling to cooperate except on x terms without providing reciprocal insurance (loyalty).

    From this perspective it’s extremely easy to understand the evolutionary biology at work.

    I have avoided this particular line of investigation and argument because I feel it is destructive to common interests. So I prefer to deny libertarians the fantasy that they can possess liberty without fighting and reciprocal insurance via loyalty.

    I had hoped to merely end libertarianism by demonstrating the fallacies of mises, rothbard and hoppe as mere word games, and that the dreams of a property-commune were just as absurd as the dreams of a commons-commune.

    But the science is sitting out there. And the evidence is everywhere. So if I have to go out and emasculate the libertarian movement further I will.

    At present I prefer to just say “look guys, I understand, its impossible so support the warrior class and understand that you are gonna have to either operate at their grace, or at least stay out of their way. Because they will create sovereignty under which you can have your liberty. But without them creating sovereignty, you cannot possible ever again have your liberty. because there are no borderlands left.”

    There is only one source of liberty: a universal, armed, organized, militiia demanding it from a sovereign in exchange for compensation.

    There is only one source of sovereignty, and that is a universal, armed, organized, militia, imposing rule of law, under natural law, universal standing, and universal application, producing markets for reproduction(marriage), production(goods, services, and information), commons, and polities, wherein each man fully insures each other man and his property in toto from imposition of costs.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-10 20:09:00 UTC