Form: Mini Essay

I DON’T WRITE ABOUT WHITE SUPREMACY – BUT ABOUT WESTERN CIVILIZATION’S INNOVATIONS THAT ALL NATIONS AND PEOPLES CAN COPY FOR THEMSELVES

First, I don’t write white supremacy, I write about *why did europe drag humanity out of ignorance superstition, poverty, starvation, disease, and tyranny, in both the ancient world and the modern world?*

Second I write more anti-racism than any other conservative living that I know of.

Third I state that by adopting western civilization’s methods, and nationalism, that all people can escape ignorance, poverty, starvation, disease, and tyranny.

Fourth, I state that all of this can be done by nothing more than rule of law under natural law, and small, homoenous, redistributive nations.

The fact that *nationalists around the world* follow me for that reason is obvious evidence.

Let me ask you a question. If I was to tell you that you and all your relatives on both sides of your family, out to six generations, have to have only one child, and that we will tax you such that you can only have one child, for the next two centuries, then how would you feel about it? (You might feel that your family was being exterminated.)

Now, imagine that your family had managed its reproduction, mate selection, savings, education, children, and land for many generations and were being exterminated by current government policy. How would you feel about it? ( How you feel is determined by your current feelings of security, and your family’s achievements – or lack thereof.)

Now, do you agree or disagree that diversity decreases trust and increases political competition? (It decreases trust, increases transaction costs, decreases the influence of norms, and increases political competition for rents and privileges.)

Do you agree or disagree that groups of people from similar racial, subracial, tribal, and class backgrounds demonstrate greater or less genetic neoteny, and greater or less sexual dimorphism, and lower or higher distributions of intellectual, emotional, and physical abilities? (sorry but they do. the primary difference between groups and classes is neotonic selection and sexual dimorphism)

Do you agree or disagree that people who are ‘with their own people’ and are disadvantaged by birth, take better care of their own people, with less usury and abuse? (they do demonstrably, everywhere. hence why nordics redistribute and tribal peoples don’t.)

Do you agree or disagree that we have a responsibility to one another to insure the happiness and improvement of each tribe, subrace, race, and mankind in each generation? (I see no other choice – not because of high mindedness, but because it is the only possible answer for mutually assured success.)

All human groups have the ability to reach equality through demographic evolution or demographic devolution. All human groups at present are dramatically unequal. And all human groups that attempt to integrate descend into dysgenia, ignorance, and poverty – demographic devolution. Europe and china excelled because we were homogenous and able to insulate themselves from the steppe and desert people who were less able to self domesticate through generations of selection under farming.

These are purely scientific questions with purely scientific answers.

So….

Is it or is it not possible that what you feel and understand is simply *false* and damaging to mankind? Or is it that you were born with feelings that do not require empirical evidence in order to test whether they are true or not?

Is it possible or not possible that just as you do not understand how economics function between the home, the locality, the nation, and the world, that norms and institutions function differently at different scales – for the same reason: you are generally wrong about everything above and below the scale of your perceptions.

Unless you understand the very deep sophistication of my arguments then you are just another useful idiot in the enslavement by lies, credit, and laws that women and slaves were in the ancient world – and destroyed the four great civilization sin the ancient world – feeling just as you do. And you are just as useful an idiot in destroying the great civilizations of the modern world – feeling as you do.

Let a thousand gods, a thousand temples, a thousand nations bloom. But end monopoly where people like me and mine must share a government with people like you and yours.

Sharing a government is a bad thing. It leads to conflict everywhere in the world that it has been tried.

So, I am willing to let you live freely as you wish. Are you willing to let me live freely as I wish?

If not then civil war is the only choice. And it is the Just and Right choice.

Because refusal would be the ultimate immorality.