Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIOLOGY, POLITICS, GROUP EVOLUTIONARY STRATEGY ARE TRIVIALLY SIMPL

    PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIOLOGY, POLITICS, GROUP EVOLUTIONARY STRATEGY ARE TRIVIALLY SIMPLE.

    But it takes a great deal of Agency (evolutionary advancement) to accept (Tolerate and avoid fictionalisms) that simplicity.

    Honestly.

    1 – if you get mises and hoppe’s property rights analysis, and just add property-in -toto, so that you end up with acquisitionism.

    2 – If you then take the cognitive biases you see how evolution fucked with us to keep us taking risks (acting, exploring) within our energy limits.

    3 – Then take five factors, then ten dimensions of personality.

    4 – Then take those factors and map them to phases of the prey drive on y axis, and male vs female reproductive strategies on the x-axis, and you have all of psychology.

    5 – Then take haidt’s moral categories and express them as property rights, and you have all of political psychology and sociology.

    6 – Then all you have is reciprocity > individual violations of reciprocity > gender violations of reciprocity > class and group violations of reciprocity > and group evolutionary violations of reciprocity, and you have all of politics.

    In other words, we can cooperate honestly on one hand, and we can game each other on the other, and we can game each other at every scale from the individual to the nation.

    I mean, really, it’s all that simple. That’s the boring science of it. We are very obvious gene machines that create fictions in order to cooperate while maintaining the optimum level of cheating possible within the available limits of cooperation.

    Psychology either takes that scientific position, or it takes a fictionalist position. Most of us want a fictionalist position when we are young so that we can ‘feel’. Some of us want a fictionalist position when we are developing, so that we can strategize for an advantage. Some of us who mature want a justification of our strategy to provide positive feedback for our immoral successes, or our personal weakness and failings. Some people don’t fictionalize at all, they just compete without doing harm. They are the defacto natural elite.

    The Truth is very simple. But the number of fictions we have invented to complicate what is very obviously the rational actions of a selfish animal in competition with other superpredators – and thereby obscure our hierarchy of immoralities.

    But such fictions allow us to form coalitions of people with the same immoralities (systems of parasitism). Just as much as the truth would allow us to form coalitions of people with no immoralities and no parasitisms.

    The difference is very simple: only a superior people would choose Sovereignty, reciprocity, truth(empiricism, operationalism), and markets in everything – because only a superior people can compete by sovereign, reciprocal, truthful, trusting, and market-competitive means.

    And only inferior people would choose an alternative.

    Hence the few use truth and markets and the many use fictionalisms. Because there are so few who are superior to the mass of humanity.

    And very few men are of sufficient agency to acknowledge these truths.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-28 10:53:00 UTC

  • The Answer To The Restoration In A Nutshell

    When european women obtained their ‘freedom’ via the mechanical innovations of men, the ballot by the permission of men, and birth control by the scientific innovations of men, they put their efforts not into mechanical and scientific innovations, but to attack men, the church, and did so using the ballot and state. And when American women did so, likewise they did not seek achievement, but to attack – but lacking the church or the nobility they attacked men in general. They destroyed our boys, our schools, our families, and our government – and now western civilization, by the ballot, and their near monopoly on consumption. Men create nearly everything, but women consume nearly everything. Our experiments with democracy rather than rule of law of reciprocity and markets in everything, capitalism rather than rule of law of reciprocity, feminism instead of contractual relations under the rule of law of reciprocity, and free speech, rather than a market for law(reciprocity) order, goods, services, and information. THE ENLIGHTENMENTS We have seen four European enlightenments that have dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, disease, early death, and the deceptions of Priests and Tyrants. 1-Early Aryan/Seas – Truth @2000-1500bc. 2- Ancient Mediterranean Sea – Reason 600bc to 100ad, and 3-Late Medieval Atlantic Ocean – Empiricism, 1200ad to 1700ad, and 4-Truncated Germanic Scientific Enlightenment – science 1830-1940ad 5- The heavily-resisted information revolution. currently in progress. The First Aryan Enlightenment of truth was opposed by the creation of organized religion as a means of resisting the invention of aristocracy. The Second Aryan Enlightenment of reason was opposed by the creation of monotheistic and abrahamic deception. The Third Aryan Enlightenment produced weath that all groups sought to oppose by creating create pseudo moral narratives by which they could privatize those technological gains. The Fourth Aryan Enlightenment produced wealth that all groups sought political power by which they could privatize those technological gains. However, each of those opportunities for parasitic gains by various means of deception, were created by a single Aryan technology: Sovereignty which requires Rule of Law of Reciprocity > Empirical (operational) Truth > Jury and produces markets in everything as a result: association, cooperation, reproduction, production of goods services and information(markets), production of commons (govt as market), and king as judge of last resort. Western civilization can function only if it is homogenous and high trust. No other people have demonstrated an ability to produce such Civilizations of such creativity and innovation with exclusive reliance on markets governed by the limits of reciprocity that we call natural law. IN EACH ERA WE ARE TOO FORGIVING. Why? we do not limit markets to consumption of our most precious asset: our genes, and our civilization. In this sense, markets not limited to natural law are just as suicidal as any other form of hyperconsumption. THIS PROBLEM IS SOLVABLE By restoration of the single law of reciprocity that we call natural law, and the prohibition on the imposition of costs upon all forms of capital, including, genetic, cultural, and traditional. And most importantly, by extension of the demand for warranty of due diligence from goods and services, to speech (information). Free truthful speech is one thing. Free False Speech is not. And we now have the ability to determine whether speech is warrantied against ignorance, error, bias, and deceit. IN OTHER WORDS… we must restore Defamation, LIbel and slander, and we must extend defamation, libel and slander protections to Sovereignty, Reciprocity, and Truth. That would allow us to prosecute Gossip, Rallying, Shaming – the tool used by women, the abrahamists, and the underclasses who are too incompetent to contribute to markets.

  • The Answer To The Restoration In A Nutshell

    When european women obtained their ‘freedom’ via the mechanical innovations of men, the ballot by the permission of men, and birth control by the scientific innovations of men, they put their efforts not into mechanical and scientific innovations, but to attack men, the church, and did so using the ballot and state. And when American women did so, likewise they did not seek achievement, but to attack – but lacking the church or the nobility they attacked men in general. They destroyed our boys, our schools, our families, and our government – and now western civilization, by the ballot, and their near monopoly on consumption. Men create nearly everything, but women consume nearly everything. Our experiments with democracy rather than rule of law of reciprocity and markets in everything, capitalism rather than rule of law of reciprocity, feminism instead of contractual relations under the rule of law of reciprocity, and free speech, rather than a market for law(reciprocity) order, goods, services, and information. THE ENLIGHTENMENTS We have seen four European enlightenments that have dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, disease, early death, and the deceptions of Priests and Tyrants. 1-Early Aryan/Seas – Truth @2000-1500bc. 2- Ancient Mediterranean Sea – Reason 600bc to 100ad, and 3-Late Medieval Atlantic Ocean – Empiricism, 1200ad to 1700ad, and 4-Truncated Germanic Scientific Enlightenment – science 1830-1940ad 5- The heavily-resisted information revolution. currently in progress. The First Aryan Enlightenment of truth was opposed by the creation of organized religion as a means of resisting the invention of aristocracy. The Second Aryan Enlightenment of reason was opposed by the creation of monotheistic and abrahamic deception. The Third Aryan Enlightenment produced weath that all groups sought to oppose by creating create pseudo moral narratives by which they could privatize those technological gains. The Fourth Aryan Enlightenment produced wealth that all groups sought political power by which they could privatize those technological gains. However, each of those opportunities for parasitic gains by various means of deception, were created by a single Aryan technology: Sovereignty which requires Rule of Law of Reciprocity > Empirical (operational) Truth > Jury and produces markets in everything as a result: association, cooperation, reproduction, production of goods services and information(markets), production of commons (govt as market), and king as judge of last resort. Western civilization can function only if it is homogenous and high trust. No other people have demonstrated an ability to produce such Civilizations of such creativity and innovation with exclusive reliance on markets governed by the limits of reciprocity that we call natural law. IN EACH ERA WE ARE TOO FORGIVING. Why? we do not limit markets to consumption of our most precious asset: our genes, and our civilization. In this sense, markets not limited to natural law are just as suicidal as any other form of hyperconsumption. THIS PROBLEM IS SOLVABLE By restoration of the single law of reciprocity that we call natural law, and the prohibition on the imposition of costs upon all forms of capital, including, genetic, cultural, and traditional. And most importantly, by extension of the demand for warranty of due diligence from goods and services, to speech (information). Free truthful speech is one thing. Free False Speech is not. And we now have the ability to determine whether speech is warrantied against ignorance, error, bias, and deceit. IN OTHER WORDS… we must restore Defamation, LIbel and slander, and we must extend defamation, libel and slander protections to Sovereignty, Reciprocity, and Truth. That would allow us to prosecute Gossip, Rallying, Shaming – the tool used by women, the abrahamists, and the underclasses who are too incompetent to contribute to markets.

  • THE ANSWER TO THE RESTORATION IN A NUTSHELL When european women obtained their ‘

    THE ANSWER TO THE RESTORATION IN A NUTSHELL

    When european women obtained their ‘freedom’ via the mechanical innovations of men, the ballot by the permission of men, and birth control by the scientific innovations of men, they put their efforts not into mechanical and scientific innovations, but to attack men, the church, and did so using the ballot and state. And when American women did so, likewise they did not seek achievement, but to attack – but lacking the church or the nobility they attacked men in general.

    They destroyed our boys, our schools, our families, and our government – and now western civilization, by the ballot, and their near monopoly on consumption.

    Men create nearly everything, but women consume nearly everything.

    Our experiments with democracy rather than rule of law of reciprocity and markets in everything, capitalism rather than rule of law of reciprocity, feminism instead of contractual relations under the rule of law of reciprocity, and free speech, rather than a market for law(reciprocity) order, goods, services, and information.

    THE ENLIGHTENMENTS

    We have seen four European enlightenments that have dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, disease, early death, and the deceptions of Priests and Tyrants.

    1-Early Aryan/Seas – Truth @2000-1500bc.

    2- Ancient Mediterranean Sea – Reason 600bc to 100ad, and

    3-Late Medieval Atlantic Ocean – Empiricism, 1200ad to 1700ad, and

    4-Truncated Germanic Scientific Enlightenment – science 1830-1940ad

    5- The heavily-resisted information revolution. currently in progress.

    The First Aryan Enlightenment of truth was opposed by the creation of organized religion as a means of resisting the invention of aristocracy.

    The Second Aryan Enlightenment of reason was opposed by the creation of monotheistic and abrahamic deception.

    The Third Aryan Enlightenment produced weath that all groups sought to oppose by creating create pseudo moral narratives by which they could privatize those technological gains.

    The Fourth Aryan Enlightenment produced wealth that all groups sought political power by which they could privatize those technological gains.

    However, each of those opportunities for parasitic gains by various means of deception, were created by a single Aryan technology: Sovereignty which requires Rule of Law of Reciprocity > Empirical (operational) Truth > Jury and produces markets in everything as a result: association, cooperation, reproduction, production of goods services and information(markets), production of commons (govt as market), and king as judge of last resort.

    Western civilization can function only if it is homogenous and high trust. No other people have demonstrated an ability to produce such Civilizations of such creativity and innovation with exclusive reliance on markets governed by the limits of reciprocity that we call natural law.

    IN EACH ERA WE ARE TOO FORGIVING.

    Why? we do not limit markets to consumption of our most precious asset: our genes, and our civilization.

    In this sense, markets not limited to natural law are just as suicidal as any other form of hyperconsumption.

    THIS PROBLEM IS SOLVABLE

    By restoration of the single law of reciprocity that we call natural law, and the prohibition on the imposition of costs upon all forms of capital, including, genetic, cultural, and traditional. And most importantly, by extension of the demand for warranty of due diligence from goods and services, to speech (information). Free truthful speech is one thing. Free False Speech is not. And we now have the ability to determine whether speech is warrantied against ignorance, error, bias, and deceit.

    IN OTHER WORDS…

    we must restore Defamation, LIbel and slander, and we must extend defamation, libel and slander protections to Sovereignty, Reciprocity, and Truth. That would allow us to prosecute Gossip, Rallying, Shaming – the tool used by women, the abrahamists, and the underclasses who are too incompetent to contribute to markets.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-27 14:13:00 UTC

  • Is It Better For A Woman To Have An Iq Of 140 Or Above And Be Average Looking Or Less, Or To Have An Exceptional Physical Beauty That Defies Age With An Iq Of 100?

    It’s actually the wrong question. It is better to have fewer defects than to have extraordinary advantages.

    LOOSE STATISTICS

    • After a family makes 100K a year (50k each), they do not get happier with more income.
    • After an individual has an IQ above 105 they do not get happier with more.
    • After an individual has average looks (Sexual Market Value), they do not get happier with more –
    • The women who have the most children are 5′4″ tall, brunette, fit, have average intelligence, and ‘femininity’. (Because men will sacrifice more for them).
    • There is a 20% premium in income and happiness on ‘primping, preening, and fitness’. Dress well, primp and preen, stay fit.
    • Women have higher sexual market value when young that continually declines unless they develop what used to be called ‘grace’. Men have higher sexual market value if they age as long as they produce even a little income, remain fit, and practice good grooming. Unfortunately women have a much easier time fitting in to changes in social arrangements and men a much harder time adapting to changes in social arrangements. Unfortunately men absorb nearly all the cellular damage on behalf of women and children – and have shorter life spans because of it.
    • There is a significant correlation between avoiding debt and happiness. Do not chase virtue signals or conspicuous consumption signals. The only ‘unnecessary’ expense should be living where you’re around ‘better’ neighbors.
    • There is a significant correlation between high intelligence and unhappiness. Grouchy old smart people are not an illusion. They’re frustrated that the children are running with social, political, and economic scissors.
    • Happiness is generally the result of family, friendship, and organizational relationships.

    ie: if you are asking whether it’s going to make you happier or not, it is evidently far better to be at least average looking, stay fit, groomed, and dressed, have a balanced personality, and average intelligence, than it is to be exceptionally intelligent.

    But more importantly, the underlying answer is that it is better to have few disadvantages, than to have ay particularly advantage.

    (Women (unfortunately) compete with other women – and not with men. Everything they do is to increase or maintain their status with other women. This is why women generally destroy each other in organizations – through hen pecking (gossip). Why? Men only want to know their place in line. Women are always frustrated and petulant if they are not at the head of the line. This psychological quirk explains most of women’s behavior in private, public, and politics. Women poison wells with gossip. Everywhere in society. )

    https://www.quora.com/Is-it-better-for-a-woman-to-have-an-IQ-of-140-or-above-and-be-average-looking-or-less-or-to-have-an-exceptional-physical-beauty-that-defies-age-with-an-IQ-of-100

  • What Do You Think About Anarchism?

    Anarchism is a nonsense word invented as a trope in the same way the capitalism vs socialism are nonsense words invented as tropes – in order to distract from and avoid the causal problem: whether one is ruled by rule of law versus discretionary rule (not rule of law, but rule by command, rule by oligarchy(legislation), or rule by primitive custom).

    One either has rule of law or discretionary rule.

    One either has monological law (empirical law) of reciprocity , or one has discretionary ‘judgement’ – not law.

    The reason the anarchists invented ‘anarchism’ was to preserve poly ethical (immoral) tribal law.

    Why? because western europeans practice high trust, and are the highest trust peoples on earth (and always have been). Others cannot compete (or their group evolutionary strategies are parasitic) and

    The monarchies allowed ‘hosted peoples’ to retain their common laws (superstitions) when dealing with one another, and enforced the kings law (native european reciprocity) when dealing with others.

    If you have rule of law you will end up with markets in everything and a high trust society.

    If you have discretionary rule you will end up with corruption in everything and a low trust society.

    Marxism Socialism, Libertarianism, and Conservatism are all attempts to change the discourse from science and rule of law, to empty moralizing.

    For the simple reason that everyone can think he’s moral and right while rule of law is dismantled systematically – as it has been since the end of the wars.

    https://www.quora.com/What-do-you-think-about-anarchism

  • What Do You Think About Anarchism?

    Anarchism is a nonsense word invented as a trope in the same way the capitalism vs socialism are nonsense words invented as tropes – in order to distract from and avoid the causal problem: whether one is ruled by rule of law versus discretionary rule (not rule of law, but rule by command, rule by oligarchy(legislation), or rule by primitive custom).

    One either has rule of law or discretionary rule.

    One either has monological law (empirical law) of reciprocity , or one has discretionary ‘judgement’ – not law.

    The reason the anarchists invented ‘anarchism’ was to preserve poly ethical (immoral) tribal law.

    Why? because western europeans practice high trust, and are the highest trust peoples on earth (and always have been). Others cannot compete (or their group evolutionary strategies are parasitic) and

    The monarchies allowed ‘hosted peoples’ to retain their common laws (superstitions) when dealing with one another, and enforced the kings law (native european reciprocity) when dealing with others.

    If you have rule of law you will end up with markets in everything and a high trust society.

    If you have discretionary rule you will end up with corruption in everything and a low trust society.

    Marxism Socialism, Libertarianism, and Conservatism are all attempts to change the discourse from science and rule of law, to empty moralizing.

    For the simple reason that everyone can think he’s moral and right while rule of law is dismantled systematically – as it has been since the end of the wars.

    https://www.quora.com/What-do-you-think-about-anarchism

  • “What would happen to the US economy if (scenario 1) the top 5% unleashed all th

    —“What would happen to the US economy if (scenario 1) the top 5% unleashed all their savings or (scenario 2) put away gradually more into savings?”— I think others have answered this closely but I’ll try to add some precision: *There are no such savings to be unleashed*. It’s already put to use, mostly in home and business real estate – providing home ownership that could not exist otherwise. Why? Fiat currency inflation makes it impossible to save. You have to put your money to work just to try to preserve value. Why fiat currency inflation? Because we try to artificially increase employment by artificially stimulating consumption, by artificially discounting the price of credit, by artificially producing ‘money’ by simply debiting and crediting treasury and bank accounts. The Cathedral (Academy – Media – State complex that replaced the military industrial complex ) quite intentionally misrepresent the fact that owning (controlling) money, is different from having (storing) it. For the (a) voluntary organization of production, distribution, and trade, to evolve into (b) patterns (networks) of specialization and trade, and into (c) markets that provide continuous adaptation to demand, shocks, innovation, and continuously reduce prices money(wealth, capital) must be organized into a pareto distribution (20% of the population must control at least 80% of the capital), and within that pareto distribution’s 20% another pareto distribution, and so on. (Really, it has to be so. It’s just math and incentives.) The reason goods get cheaper is that people at the top of any distribution (and at every level under it) seek signals. We can virtue signal (words), we can membership signal (dress), we can status signal (consumption). People at the tops of distributions pay for research and development in signals, that then decrease in cost and increase in ownership. Hence why Gucci bags, and Ferrari’s (neither of which are expensive to produce) are so expensive: to make them scarce, and therefore to preserve their signal value. (Hence why iphones can be so profitable for apple: signal value.) Because really, all we all do is chase status signals like mice, hamsters, rats , and squirrels, in the squirrel cage wheel. The greatest subconscious fear of humans is ‘being left behind’. Hence: status signals.

  • “What would happen to the US economy if (scenario 1) the top 5% unleashed all th

    —“What would happen to the US economy if (scenario 1) the top 5% unleashed all their savings or (scenario 2) put away gradually more into savings?”— I think others have answered this closely but I’ll try to add some precision: *There are no such savings to be unleashed*. It’s already put to use, mostly in home and business real estate – providing home ownership that could not exist otherwise. Why? Fiat currency inflation makes it impossible to save. You have to put your money to work just to try to preserve value. Why fiat currency inflation? Because we try to artificially increase employment by artificially stimulating consumption, by artificially discounting the price of credit, by artificially producing ‘money’ by simply debiting and crediting treasury and bank accounts. The Cathedral (Academy – Media – State complex that replaced the military industrial complex ) quite intentionally misrepresent the fact that owning (controlling) money, is different from having (storing) it. For the (a) voluntary organization of production, distribution, and trade, to evolve into (b) patterns (networks) of specialization and trade, and into (c) markets that provide continuous adaptation to demand, shocks, innovation, and continuously reduce prices money(wealth, capital) must be organized into a pareto distribution (20% of the population must control at least 80% of the capital), and within that pareto distribution’s 20% another pareto distribution, and so on. (Really, it has to be so. It’s just math and incentives.) The reason goods get cheaper is that people at the top of any distribution (and at every level under it) seek signals. We can virtue signal (words), we can membership signal (dress), we can status signal (consumption). People at the tops of distributions pay for research and development in signals, that then decrease in cost and increase in ownership. Hence why Gucci bags, and Ferrari’s (neither of which are expensive to produce) are so expensive: to make them scarce, and therefore to preserve their signal value. (Hence why iphones can be so profitable for apple: signal value.) Because really, all we all do is chase status signals like mice, hamsters, rats , and squirrels, in the squirrel cage wheel. The greatest subconscious fear of humans is ‘being left behind’. Hence: status signals.

  • Why I Write Natural Law (Science) Not Philosophy (Choice).

    Human nature invests minimum to gain maximum and is quite lazy when it comes to unnecessary precision, but then attempts to use imprecise terms (and ideas) to solve precise problems. Human experties in sciences (deflationary grammars) serves to deflate any given level of abstraction. I have a chart you need to see. I understand the unification of the sciences and I think plenty of other people do – but it’s just very different from what we’d expected. —“the inference would be that a corresponding language of specificity would be a part of that.”— Well, exactly. –“However, that is not why we have failed at achieving”— The reason we failed is that there is a market for agency via deception (non-correspondence, inconsistency, and in-coherence), just as much as there is a market for agency via truthfulness(correspondence, consistency, and coherence). Ergo, just as we have eliminated the markets for violence, theft, fraud, free riding, etc, we can eliminate the market for falsehoods: by law. The problem was (and is no longer) a criteria for warranty of due diligence against falsehood of information entered intot he informational commons. In other words, I’m not ‘selling’. I’m not interested in convincing people that crime is crime, only in producing law that states what crime is, and therefore outlaws it. People will then respond accordingly – as they always have done – to incremental suppression of parasitism. And that is the means by which we have produced civilization: the incremental suppression of parasitism through the incremental expansion of the law, by the discovery and cataloging the means by which man engages in parasitism. So I am not really writing philosophy (choice and preference), but law (necessity and truth). Hence my lack of concern for what ‘people think’. People have ‘thought’ that outlawing each form of parasitism was bad in every generation because it forces them into survival in the service of others in the market – and non-survival if they do not.