Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • Why Is America So Complicated?

    —-”Why is America so complicated?”—-

    Because the experiment in middle-class rule, using the single law of reciprocity (natural law), with all legislation strictly constructed from that single law of reciprocity, and the darwinian and maxwellian revolution that explained it has been systematically undermined beginning with the civil war, exacerbated by excessive immigration in the 1920’s, and expressly so since the 1960s failure of world communism, and its replacement by postmodernism (denial of sciences).

    In other words.

    1 – We had a Perfect Government of the classes, and states, under rule of natural law (reciprocity). A monarchy as a judge of last resort, commercial nobility representing the states, and small business owners representing their families.

    2 – Instead of adding a house of ‘labor’ then a house of ‘women’, and continuing the use of houses as markets for production of commons between the classes, we created a monopoly under the pretense of democracy, and thus single class (underclass) rule.

    3 – Since the underclass can never organize, produce, manage, or govern, the and since the priesthood was disenfranchised under the scientific revolution, a new secular priesthood evolved out of the academy using liberalism(activism), then marxism (underclass), socialism (working class), and postmodernism(clerical class), and feminism (single motherhood) with pseudoscience and the false promise of prosperity under the secular priesthood control, replacing supernaturalism and the false promise of prosperity after death under the supernatural priesthood’s control.

    4 – And as such we live in a world of lies.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-is-America-so-complicated

  • Why Does The NRA Insist It Represents The Best Interests Of America And Claims To Have Strong Support When Only 2% Of The Population Are NRA Members?

    —-”Why does the NRA insist it represents the best interests of America and claims to have strong support when only 2% of the population are NRA members?”—-

    You need to understand the Pareto Rule. 1% of people determine everything. 19% of people organize the remaining 80% of people so that it gets done.

    This is why always and everywhere 80% of wealth is in the possession of 20% of the people. Because that distribution (a power law) is required to provide people with incentives to do something constructive rather than prey upon one another. (really). Slavery, and serfdom are actually expensive. Freemen are profitable. Citizens are more profitable. Universal citizenship appears to have been a mistake.

    The origin of all orders is the organized application of violence to deny anyone the alternatives.

    It takes about .0001% of adult males to change the political order by the use of violence.

    Hence, the armed militia rules, and the government is merely operating within the tolerances of that militia.

    That is why anglo peoples have frequent small revolutions that do little other than modify the *written* social contract, we now call the constitution.

    The NRA funcitons as the political arm of the militia. They negotiate with the governemtn on behalf of the militia.

    The alternative is to end the government, for violating the constitution created by the militia.

    Which is what we are very close to doing.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-does-the-NRA-insist-it-represents-the-best-interests-of-America-and-claims-to-have-strong-support-when-only-2-of-the-population-are-NRA-members

  • THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD WARS AGAINST WHITE PEOPLE Whites have dragged humanity

    THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD WARS AGAINST WHITE PEOPLE

    Whites have dragged humanity kicking and screaming at every turn out of superstition, ignorance, poverty, starvation, hard labor, child mortality, early death, disease, plagues, the vicissitudes of nature, and a universe hostile to complex life.

    GENERATION ONE

    When we invented heroism and created we created AGENCY, they fought us with organized religion. (Yes really, that’s the origin of authoritarian religion – the resistance to west-indo europeans.)

    GENERATION TWO 800BC-100 AD

    When we developed reason, and created enlightenment, they developed monotheism to resist us. In a very short time they destroyed the great civilizations of the ancient world.

    GENERATION THREE 1540-1680

    When we developed empiricism, the french,germans,russians and jews developed fundamentalism, french moralism, german rationalism, russian literary counter-enlightenemnts and a tepid jewish reformation of jewish law. And they froze the re-enlightenment, gave birth to Napoleon, and destroyed the engine of european civilization’s resistance: the german princedoms. The continental enlightenment is a COUNTER REVOLUTION against the scientific revolution. (Yes, really. All of it.) Only the british remain empirical. Only the Americans created rule of law.

    GENERATION FOUR

    THe industrial revolution begins in England, where empiricism ruled because the origin of empiricism is the common law of tort among the germanic peoples. This further disrupts all civilizations. When we developed science to continue the scientific revolution, they developed marxism, socialism, postmodernism, feminism, and islamism. And invented Pseudoscience (Marx, Freud, Boaz, Cantor, Frankfurt). And we had our World Wars.

    GENERATION FIVE

    Now that we have developed computer science and information technology, they are simply engaging in outright denial of every form of truth, trust, and merit. And we are very close to civil war.

    We resist their barbarism at every turn, they are thankless children.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-24 20:20:00 UTC

  • The History Of The World Wars Against White People

    THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD WARS AGAINST WHITE PEOPLE Whites have dragged humanity kicking and screaming at every turn out of superstition, ignorance, poverty, starvation, hard labor, child mortality, early death, disease, plagues, the vicissitudes of nature, and a universe hostile to complex life. GENERATION ONE When we invented heroism and created we created AGENCY, they fought us with organized religion. (Yes really, that’s the origin of authoritarian religion – the resistance to west-indo europeans.) GENERATION TWO 800BC-100 AD When we developed reason, and created enlightenment, they developed monotheism to resist us. In a very short time they destroyed the great civilizations of the ancient world. GENERATION THREE 1540-1680 When we developed empiricism, the french,germans,russians and jews developed fundamentalism, french moralism, german rationalism, russian literary counter-enlightenemnts and a tepid jewish reformation of jewish law. And they froze the re-enlightenment, gave birth to Napoleon, and destroyed the engine of european civilization’s resistance: the german princedoms. The continental enlightenment is a COUNTER REVOLUTION against the scientific revolution. (Yes, really. All of it.) Only the british remain empirical. Only the Americans created rule of law. GENERATION FOUR THe industrial revolution begins in England, where empiricism ruled because the origin of empiricism is the common law of tort among the germanic peoples. This further disrupts all civilizations. When we developed science to continue the scientific revolution, they developed marxism, socialism, postmodernism, feminism, and islamism. And invented Pseudoscience (Marx, Freud, Boaz, Cantor, Frankfurt). And we had our World Wars. GENERATION FIVE Now that we have developed computer science and information technology, they are simply engaging in outright denial of every form of truth, trust, and merit. And we are very close to civil war. We resist their barbarism at every turn, they are thankless children.

  • The History Of The World Wars Against White People

    THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD WARS AGAINST WHITE PEOPLE Whites have dragged humanity kicking and screaming at every turn out of superstition, ignorance, poverty, starvation, hard labor, child mortality, early death, disease, plagues, the vicissitudes of nature, and a universe hostile to complex life. GENERATION ONE When we invented heroism and created we created AGENCY, they fought us with organized religion. (Yes really, that’s the origin of authoritarian religion – the resistance to west-indo europeans.) GENERATION TWO 800BC-100 AD When we developed reason, and created enlightenment, they developed monotheism to resist us. In a very short time they destroyed the great civilizations of the ancient world. GENERATION THREE 1540-1680 When we developed empiricism, the french,germans,russians and jews developed fundamentalism, french moralism, german rationalism, russian literary counter-enlightenemnts and a tepid jewish reformation of jewish law. And they froze the re-enlightenment, gave birth to Napoleon, and destroyed the engine of european civilization’s resistance: the german princedoms. The continental enlightenment is a COUNTER REVOLUTION against the scientific revolution. (Yes, really. All of it.) Only the british remain empirical. Only the Americans created rule of law. GENERATION FOUR THe industrial revolution begins in England, where empiricism ruled because the origin of empiricism is the common law of tort among the germanic peoples. This further disrupts all civilizations. When we developed science to continue the scientific revolution, they developed marxism, socialism, postmodernism, feminism, and islamism. And invented Pseudoscience (Marx, Freud, Boaz, Cantor, Frankfurt). And we had our World Wars. GENERATION FIVE Now that we have developed computer science and information technology, they are simply engaging in outright denial of every form of truth, trust, and merit. And we are very close to civil war. We resist their barbarism at every turn, they are thankless children.

  • ”Which groups tend to be more marginalized, religious or ethnic?”—- The correct

    —”Which groups tend to be more marginalized, religious or ethnic?”—-

    The correct if unpleasant answer.

    1. All groups that cannot, do not, or slowly integrate and compete are marginalized (disciplined). And furthermore, they should be, until they integrate so thoroughly that the marginalization (discipline for non conformity) does not exist, because the cost of their integration does not exist.

    Groups disrespect(discipline, outcast, or boycott,) competition with (against) their traditions, norms, status, and laws. And there is good reason to do so: they are paying a high cost of integrating underdeveloped peoples – without any benefit of doing so.

    2. Any group that is marginalized (disciplined, disrespected, outcast, boycotted) must have a reason for invading (moving to) a society that disciplines them. The question is, if the traditions, institutions, norms, status signals, and laws, are more desirable in the culture that they are invading, then therefore the traditions, institutions, norms, and status signals that they bring with them are de-facto ‘bad’.

    3. So, when in Rome do as Romans do, or do not go to Rome.

    4. Ergo, it depends on whether the invader (disciplined, marginalized) group is genetically problematic (ethnic) because they have an larger undomesticated under, working, or middle class, that forces the host group to bear the costs of their lack of genetic domestication – or whether they are cultural competitors (religious) that forces the host group to bear the cost of training the underdeveloped norms and traditions. Or whether they are commercial competitors, which most groups seem to tolerate as a benefit at the cost of some status signal loss. Or whether they are institutional competitors, bringing with them a competing law. Or whether they are military competitors, which all groups despise.

    5. It is possible to force all of the above costs on a host people: Genetic, Cultural, Commercial, Institutional(law), and Military.

    That’s the answer:

    Groups are marginalized (disrespected, disciplined, outcast, boycotted) because they should be.

    So the groups that are more marginalized (disciplined) than the others are the groups that are most costly to integrate.

    And therefore “the most costly groups are those with the greatest cumulative set of costs: in the combination of genetic, cultural, commercial, institutional, and military.

    (NOTE: This is why Islam is so costly and so universally resisted. It’s dysgenic, culturally primitive, low trust, commercially weak, imposes competing laws, is intellectually regressive and entirely anti-intellectual, and was spread entirely by violence, at the cost of destroying the four great civilizations of the ancient world, as well, as costing 500M deaths. Islam has a simple strategy which is to breed at the bottom – the inverse of the great civilizations: far west and far east.)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-24 10:27:00 UTC

  • Which Groups Tend To Be More Marginalized, Religious Or Ethnic?

    —-”Which groups tend to be more marginalized, religious or ethnic?”—-

    The correct if unpleasant answer.

    1. All groups that cannot, do not, or slowly integrate and compete are marginalized (disciplined). And furthermore, they should be, until they integrate so thoroughly that the marginalization (discipline for non conformity) does not exist, because the cost of their integration does not exist.
    2. Groups disrespect(discipline, outcast, or boycott,) competition with (against) their traditions, norms, status, and laws. And there is good reason to do so: they are paying a high cost of integrating underdeveloped peoples – without any benefit of doing so.
    3. Any group that is marginalized (disciplined, disrespected, outcast, boycotted) must have a reason for invading (moving to) a society that disciplines them. The question is, if the traditions, institutions, norms, status signals, and laws, are more desirable in the culture that they are invading, then therefore the traditions, institutions, norms, and status signals that they bring with them are de-facto ‘bad’.
    4. So, when in Rome do as Romans do, or do not go to Rome.
    5. Ergo, it depends on whether the invader (disciplined, marginalized) group is genetically problematic (ethnic) because they have an larger undomesticated under, working, or middle class, that forces the host group to bear the costs of their lack of genetic domestication – or whether they are cultural competitors (religious) that forces the host group to bear the cost of training the underdeveloped norms and traditions. Or whether they are commercial competitors, which most groups seem to tolerate as a benefit at the cost of some status signal loss. Or whether they are institutional competitors, bringing with them a competing law. Or whether they are military competitors, which all groups despise.
    6. It is possible to force all of the above costs on a host people: Genetic, Cultural, Commercial, Institutional(law), and Military.

    That’s the answer. Groups are marginalized (disrespected, disciplined, outcast, boycotted) because they should be.

    So the groups that are more marginalized (disciplined) than the others are the groups that are most costly to integrate.

    And therefore “the most costly groups are those with the greatest cumulative set of costs: in the combination of genetic, cultural, commercial, institutional, and military.

    (NOTE: Ergo why Islam is so costly and so universally resisted. It’s dysgenic, culturally primitive, low trust, commercially weak, imposes competing laws, is intellectually regressive and entirely anti-intellectual, and was spread entirely by violence, at the cost of destroying the four great civilizations of the ancient world, as well, as costing 500M deaths. Islam has a simple strategy which is to breed at the bottom – the inverse of the great civilizations: far west and far east.)

    https://www.quora.com/Which-groups-tend-to-be-more-marginalized-religious-or-ethnic

  • Which Groups Tend To Be More Marginalized, Religious Or Ethnic?

    —-”Which groups tend to be more marginalized, religious or ethnic?”—-

    The correct if unpleasant answer.

    1. All groups that cannot, do not, or slowly integrate and compete are marginalized (disciplined). And furthermore, they should be, until they integrate so thoroughly that the marginalization (discipline for non conformity) does not exist, because the cost of their integration does not exist.
    2. Groups disrespect(discipline, outcast, or boycott,) competition with (against) their traditions, norms, status, and laws. And there is good reason to do so: they are paying a high cost of integrating underdeveloped peoples – without any benefit of doing so.
    3. Any group that is marginalized (disciplined, disrespected, outcast, boycotted) must have a reason for invading (moving to) a society that disciplines them. The question is, if the traditions, institutions, norms, status signals, and laws, are more desirable in the culture that they are invading, then therefore the traditions, institutions, norms, and status signals that they bring with them are de-facto ‘bad’.
    4. So, when in Rome do as Romans do, or do not go to Rome.
    5. Ergo, it depends on whether the invader (disciplined, marginalized) group is genetically problematic (ethnic) because they have an larger undomesticated under, working, or middle class, that forces the host group to bear the costs of their lack of genetic domestication – or whether they are cultural competitors (religious) that forces the host group to bear the cost of training the underdeveloped norms and traditions. Or whether they are commercial competitors, which most groups seem to tolerate as a benefit at the cost of some status signal loss. Or whether they are institutional competitors, bringing with them a competing law. Or whether they are military competitors, which all groups despise.
    6. It is possible to force all of the above costs on a host people: Genetic, Cultural, Commercial, Institutional(law), and Military.

    That’s the answer. Groups are marginalized (disrespected, disciplined, outcast, boycotted) because they should be.

    So the groups that are more marginalized (disciplined) than the others are the groups that are most costly to integrate.

    And therefore “the most costly groups are those with the greatest cumulative set of costs: in the combination of genetic, cultural, commercial, institutional, and military.

    (NOTE: Ergo why Islam is so costly and so universally resisted. It’s dysgenic, culturally primitive, low trust, commercially weak, imposes competing laws, is intellectually regressive and entirely anti-intellectual, and was spread entirely by violence, at the cost of destroying the four great civilizations of the ancient world, as well, as costing 500M deaths. Islam has a simple strategy which is to breed at the bottom – the inverse of the great civilizations: far west and far east.)

    https://www.quora.com/Which-groups-tend-to-be-more-marginalized-religious-or-ethnic

  • WHITES UNCOMFORTABLE WITH ACCUSATIONS OF RACISM? (NO) Because when a white perso

    https://www.quora.com/Do-white-people-feel-uncomfortable-when-they-hear-non-whites-mention-the-word-racist-around-them/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=e2593b68&srid=u4QvARE WHITES UNCOMFORTABLE WITH ACCUSATIONS OF RACISM? (NO)

    Because when a white person is called a racist, they understand

    (a) **they are being alienated by the threat of violence **

    (b)** they are being alienated so that others can achieve self image by denigrating others, **

    (c) **they are aware that only european whites and east asians have succeeded in building high trust polities.**

    (d)** they are aware the critics are just hateful and envious.

    **“No man is a hero to his debtors.”**

    **And the whole world is our debtor.**

    *We dragged makinkind one civilization at a time out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvation, hard labor, child mortality, early death, disease, tyranny, the vicissitudes of nature, and the uncertainty of a universe hostile to human life, and they resisted, kicking and screaming all the while. All these people are doing is kicking and screaming at being dragged out of their ancestral childhoods.*

    A parent must never take the words of his teenagers seriously, any more than europeans must take the words of the underclasses seriously.Updated Mar 22, 2018, 8:37 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-22 20:37:00 UTC

  • How Does The Austrian Theory Of Business Cycles Explain The Tulip Bubble€?

    I’ll try to give you the best answer possible today.

    1. All humans flock to opportunities, exploit opportunities, and defect from flocking to opportunities as the opportunities are exhausted and other, more preferable, opportunities emerge.
    2. In this sense, all human economies seek disequilibrium, because it is only in disequilibrium that opportunities exist (If we ever managed equality then we will all be poor.)
    3. Without credit, opportunities cannot be exploited at the lowest possible price (discount) simply because either (a) scarcity of the monetary resource, and (b) extraction of profits (premiums) and ‘Rents’ by savers.

      ( This topic is a significant point of contention, if not the central point of contention. The Right’s position [and mine] is that it’s not clear that earning money from your savings is necessary or beneficial – only that it not be deflated. The Left/Keynesians hold the position that you do not even have any right to the stored value of your savings. The l|Libertarian position is that you have a right to ‘seek rents’ as an investor using your savings. The libertarian is decidedly false since that is the means by which predatory subclasses have used high trust local norms to accumulate, centralize capital, and turn it against host peoples.)
    4. Credit (Promise of future repayment) assists in more people flocking to opportunities, exploiting those opportunities faster, but also defecting from those opportunities more slowly, and ending those opportunities not gradually but in a ‘bust’, leaving late defectors having lost their investments and unable to fulfill their promises.
    5. Therefore, the question has been, and remains, how much credit to provide at what price such that opportunities are exploited *by those able to exit* but not by people who *will not be able to exit*. While economic discourse appears difficult, this is actually the central question. The answer is relatively simple, in that if we are financing a shift from one network of specialization and trade to another, then that is reducing the unnecessary friction, or if we are creating opportunity for unskilled risk, and therefore creating a moral hazard (trap).

      (This topic is a significant point of contention, because it leaves most consumers out of the ‘lottery’ that loose credit can create, and out of the temporary consumption that loose credit creates, and produces a moral hazard for banks and credit institutions, by forcing them to lend money during booms to stay in business then creating waves of bankruptcies during the consequential corrections.)
    6. There are very few substantive questions in economics. (a) The means of calculating credit price and availability is one, (b) whether we can bypass the financial sector and provide liquidity directly to citizens(consumers) without simply having landlords and creditors absorb the profits now going to the financial sector, (c) the third is purely ethical and moral: and that is, do we return to intergenerational lending (all of human history until the keynesians), so that there is a good reason to provide income on savings, or do we continue extraction of rents through the financial system by charging the citizenry to borrow against their own production, or do we, as above, end the unnecessary distribution of credit capacity (and interest) for consumer consumption by just bypassing the financial sector altogether. Every other question in economics a derivative of these questions – or it is simply the use of economic analysis to investigate demonstrated human behavior, given that the (soft) social sciences (pseudosciences) of psychology, sociology, and political ‘science’ have failed to produce any repeatable scientific findings by means of self reporting or direct testing.

    Therefore, the Tulip Bubble is just a nice simple example that we use to illustrate how consumers can borrow money to invest in what they don’t understand and lose it.

    There are thousands of other examples, particularly in the new world, but the Tulip Bulb Bubble is more helpful because it communicates to average people that they too are vulnerable to malincentives, not just people with much more money.

    In other words, invest in what you do and know, and otherwise invest in index funds. In other words, Just as Little Red Riding Hood is a lesson to young girls who would do improper things for money are certain times, the Tulip Bulb serves as a parable for consumers – do what you know, and only what you know.

    https://www.quora.com/How-does-the-Austrian-theory-of-business-cycles-explain-the-tulip-bubble