I mean, the promise of life after death is a moral hazard, just as a woman ‘suggesting’ opportunities if you serve her. This technique (baiting into harm) is the feminine strategy, and it is why women were considered insidious if not hopeless through most of history. So Abrahamism is just the institutionalization of feminine moral hazard, as much as Rule of Law is the institutionalization of masculine contractualism. The universe consists of very simple rules, and human behavior is just an extension of that universe. The only difference being that once one has the capacity of memory one can choose both the first available opportunity AND NOT to, such that we preserve capital(energy) for later, higher returns. In other words, the universe must act truthfully but we can make use of cunning. There is no difference between female opposition (opportunity) to male reproductive strategy (constraint), and Semitic(feminine) vs Greco/Roman | Egyptian | Persian (masculine) strategies.
Form: Mini Essay
-
Baiting Into Harm
I mean, the promise of life after death is a moral hazard, just as a woman ‘suggesting’ opportunities if you serve her. This technique (baiting into harm) is the feminine strategy, and it is why women were considered insidious if not hopeless through most of history. So Abrahamism is just the institutionalization of feminine moral hazard, as much as Rule of Law is the institutionalization of masculine contractualism. The universe consists of very simple rules, and human behavior is just an extension of that universe. The only difference being that once one has the capacity of memory one can choose both the first available opportunity AND NOT to, such that we preserve capital(energy) for later, higher returns. In other words, the universe must act truthfully but we can make use of cunning. There is no difference between female opposition (opportunity) to male reproductive strategy (constraint), and Semitic(feminine) vs Greco/Roman | Egyptian | Persian (masculine) strategies.
-
Abrahamism = authoritarianism (submission) + Pilpul + fictionalism. It is a crit
Abrahamism = authoritarianism (submission) + Pilpul + fictionalism. It is a criticism of technique, not content. Gods serve as a system of calculation (decidability) by most primitive means (anthropic comparison). Monopoly, authority, justificationism(lying), polymoralism, and fictionalism are very different from markets, reciprocity, truth, and law.
Abrahamism is hostile to civilization. Which is why jews cannot produce trust, capital, and hold territory and have been repeatedly pushed to near extermination, muslims could use surplus population to conquer, destroy, and rule, but immediately declined into mysticism, dysgenia, tribalism, and poverty, and christianity drove the west into ignorance and poverty from which they only escaped by the reintroduction of scandinavian pagans, germanic law, and greek thought.
The lessons of the Syrians (Byzantines) that were used to canonize christianity are very simple:
1 – Extirpate hatred from the human heart.
2 – Extend kinship love to non kin (Exhaust interpersonal Forgiveness)
3 – Devote time effort and wealth to interpersonal charity.
4 – Use political intolerance for those who do otherwise. Personal tolerance political intolerance.
And by the science we know that this produces maximum possibility for integration and cooperation.
There is nothing else to be learned. Nothing. ZERO.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-22 09:56:00 UTC
-
Roughly speaking, about 1/4 of people should go through STEM university training
Roughly speaking, about 1/4 of people should go through STEM university training, and the rest should graduate high school able to work.
The problem is that we teach nonsense after 6th grade. Roughly half of all educational hours are wasted.
In my understanding we should enter people into the workforce between 12 and 14 given their rate of maturity, and teach life tools a few hours a day: money, accounting, economics, basic contracts. In fact, it’s very interesting that we teach all the sciences OTHER than the one that is most important: COOPERATION. Instead of cooperation we teach SUBMISSION.
If we were to do this we would extend work lives, and reverse infantilization, as well as all but eliminate the difficulty entering the work force. We would have vast programs of teaching-in-the-workplace at very low wages, and produce the highest skilled people in the world.
We could have fully socialized people, a more competente work force, have children in our late teens and twenties, and far lower costs.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-22 09:52:00 UTC
-
Teaching: Some Read, Some Narrate, Some Speak, Some Preach, Some Interrogate, an
Teaching: Some Read, Some Narrate, Some Speak, Some Preach, Some Interrogate, and Some Discourse. I teach by discourse, which is very suitable for Seminars. And honestly it is the only way I know how to teach – by guided storytelling. (I learned how to teach and manage by playing dungeons and dragons – really.) However, it is extremely difficult for me to read and speak at the wall, and interrogation is counter-productive. So the principle problem I have been having, now that I am ready to produce courses, is that I can’t actually present well without the ‘class’ (Audience). And the reason is I tailor my storytelling to the audience and their feedback. I can even work well in interview conditions. But without ‘responsiveness’ of an audience I find it almost impossible. Had I moved to London (or ny, or atlanta) instead of taking care of an ill family member I could easily put together a seminar and use that as the basis for videos. And I find it difficult to write without having first taught it. So (thinking out loud) I’m going to see if I an put together some sort of substitute. All in all I’m ‘done’ except for editing. But editing this density of text on this range of topics without practice ‘storytelling’ is actually very hard for me for reasons familiar to most authors – ‘to whom am I speaking’ will devolve into ‘myself’ and that is very hard for everyone other than me to understand. This problem has been dogging me since I left ukraine and the (wonderful) studio we had there.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-22 09:09:00 UTC
-
Paternalism (Aryanism) Will Help You Love People Again
PATERNALISM (ARYANISM) WILL HELP YOU LOVE PEOPLE AGAIN —“The more I learn, and ‘see’ what I learn in people and in the world, I can feel arising in me a tendency to just see most other people as non self aware, selfish actors who simply act (almost deterministically) according to their incentives, within the scope that they can understand…. which usually isn’t very large. On one hand this gives a certain amount of peace, but on the other is the temptation to simply feel atomised and a bit apathetic. Is it possible to love people and love the world despite losing so many illusions about them? And if so, how would you suggest cultivating more of that emotional state?”—Rob McMullan Well, this is what I hope ‘the precious few’ achieve: the understanding that propertarianism is as revolutionary as was empiricism, and that it’s not that we CAN’t have relatively free will but that we DON’T have relatively free will, because we are just negotiating machines on behalf of our genes using incentives. So, where you say ‘pathetic’ I”ll use the term “dehumanizing” which is how the christian world reacted against the findings of science, and in particular heliocentrism and darwinism. But once you ‘adapt’ to your new understanding, you will love people like I do, and like generals love their soldiers, like kings love their people, and mothers love their children. The miracle of it all is that IT WORKS. I mean, we actually manage to evolve and live together and drag ourselves into godhood despite being nearly automatons in doing so. It’s wondrous!!! I found I had an amazing sense of power (mindfulness), and i suspect otehrs do too. the problem is you can’t go around and change the world with the knowledge all that easily. It’s got to ‘grow’ in influence. Hence why I”m so concerned not with people agreeing, but with using force to impose the law, from which they will learn by environmental pressure and incentives rather than exposition and understanding. Once you return to being an Aryan, and seeing mankind as children and us as gods, you will just love them. It’s the christian falsehood of equality that deprives you of the option of paternalism and love for fellow man.
-
Paternalism (Aryanism) Will Help You Love People Again
PATERNALISM (ARYANISM) WILL HELP YOU LOVE PEOPLE AGAIN —“The more I learn, and ‘see’ what I learn in people and in the world, I can feel arising in me a tendency to just see most other people as non self aware, selfish actors who simply act (almost deterministically) according to their incentives, within the scope that they can understand…. which usually isn’t very large. On one hand this gives a certain amount of peace, but on the other is the temptation to simply feel atomised and a bit apathetic. Is it possible to love people and love the world despite losing so many illusions about them? And if so, how would you suggest cultivating more of that emotional state?”—Rob McMullan Well, this is what I hope ‘the precious few’ achieve: the understanding that propertarianism is as revolutionary as was empiricism, and that it’s not that we CAN’t have relatively free will but that we DON’T have relatively free will, because we are just negotiating machines on behalf of our genes using incentives. So, where you say ‘pathetic’ I”ll use the term “dehumanizing” which is how the christian world reacted against the findings of science, and in particular heliocentrism and darwinism. But once you ‘adapt’ to your new understanding, you will love people like I do, and like generals love their soldiers, like kings love their people, and mothers love their children. The miracle of it all is that IT WORKS. I mean, we actually manage to evolve and live together and drag ourselves into godhood despite being nearly automatons in doing so. It’s wondrous!!! I found I had an amazing sense of power (mindfulness), and i suspect otehrs do too. the problem is you can’t go around and change the world with the knowledge all that easily. It’s got to ‘grow’ in influence. Hence why I”m so concerned not with people agreeing, but with using force to impose the law, from which they will learn by environmental pressure and incentives rather than exposition and understanding. Once you return to being an Aryan, and seeing mankind as children and us as gods, you will just love them. It’s the christian falsehood of equality that deprives you of the option of paternalism and love for fellow man.
-
We have entered an age where all increases in productivity are offset by increas
We have entered an age where all increases in productivity are offset by increases in inflation, the purpose of which is to preserve employment, of people who are increasingly unemployable, and wage suppression of the working (meaning non-calculating, professional, non-entrepreneurial) classes will continue indefinitely as the world increasingly adds competing labor to the world labor pool. Every person in the middle is only 20% more productive than consumptive, and then only so for certain period of his or her life. so every person at the bottom quartile requires five people to pay for his existence throughout his life. Ergo, we must choose between decreasing the standard of living for all but the upper quintile, and constantly increasing inequality, or suppressing the rates of reproduction of the bottom and producing increasingly consistent equality. There is no alternative. Economics is just an extension of physics.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-20 22:04:00 UTC
-
The Constitution – A third way.
(via Quora) Our constitution was the best yet written, because it attempted to create a “third way” alternative to church or state under Natural Law – a middle class country – but it has been fairly easy to circumvent for the simple reason that the supreme court has no vehicle for ‘returning law to the congress’, and therefore can legislate from the bench. As far as I know the basis of common law is optimum (natural law of tort) and the level of detail in continental law is less open to circumvention. Our political system is outright bad, with parties, prime ministers and a monarch empirically superior by all the evidence. While conceived as a loose collection of states like europe, we have failed to preserve the independence of the states, and the presidency, and the majority election of the president, has only reinforce that problem. As such we have a continent-wide empire where everyone is always angry because each state or region has a different culture with different social, economic, political, and strategic demands. Apr 20, 2018 8:31pm
-
The Constitution – A third way.
(via Quora) Our constitution was the best yet written, because it attempted to create a “third way” alternative to church or state under Natural Law – a middle class country – but it has been fairly easy to circumvent for the simple reason that the supreme court has no vehicle for ‘returning law to the congress’, and therefore can legislate from the bench. As far as I know the basis of common law is optimum (natural law of tort) and the level of detail in continental law is less open to circumvention. Our political system is outright bad, with parties, prime ministers and a monarch empirically superior by all the evidence. While conceived as a loose collection of states like europe, we have failed to preserve the independence of the states, and the presidency, and the majority election of the president, has only reinforce that problem. As such we have a continent-wide empire where everyone is always angry because each state or region has a different culture with different social, economic, political, and strategic demands. Apr 20, 2018 8:31pm