Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • THE SCIENCE OF RELIGIONS >>1) Will Jesus be successful in saving everyone he int

    THE SCIENCE OF RELIGIONS

    >>1) Will Jesus be successful in saving everyone he intends to save?

    The individual we refer to as jesus might have existed, however almost everything other than his disruption of the temple, and his crucifiction is fiction created by Paul. Paul created Christianity, not Jesus. The reason we know that is that all the ‘jesus stories’ were originally babylonian or a derivative thereof. Just as the old testament is merely plagiarism from the babylonian record.

    >>2) Has anyone, or WILL anyone, actually go to hell?

    There is no heaven or hell, they are just babylonian fictions that metaphorically assist us in judging one another’s characters, and by character we mean contribution to, or harm to, the polity. At best we can consider heaven and hell the memories of those whose lives you affected, and the record of their actions in response to your display word and deed.

    >>3) Therefore

    THE OATH OF TRANSCENDENT MAN; A PAGAN, A CHRISTIAN, AN ARYAN, A WARRIOR, A MAN TRANSCENDENT

    I am a pagan if 1) I accept the laws of nature as binding on all of existence; and 2) if I treat nature as sacred and to be contemplated, protected and improved; and 3) I treat the world as something to transform closer to an Eden in whatever ways I can before I die; and 4) if I deny the existence of a supreme being with dominion over the physical laws, and treat all gods, demigods, heroes, saints, figures of history, and ancestors as characters with whom I may speak to in private contemplation in the hope of gaining wisdom and synchronicity from having done so. And 5) if I participate with others of my society in repetition of oaths, repetition of myths, repetition of festivals, repetition of holidays, and the perpetuation of all of the above to my offspring. And 6) if I leave open that synchronicity appears to exist now and then, and that it may be possible that there is a scientific explanation for it, other than just humans subject to similar stimuli producing similar intuitions and therefore similar ends.

    As far as I know this is all that is required of me to be a Pagan.

    I am a christian if I have adopted the teaching of christianity: 1) the eradication of hatred from the human heart. 2) the extension of kinship love to non-kin. 3) the extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war.

    As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be a Christian.

    I am an Aryan if 1) I proudly display my excellences so that others seek to achieve or exceed them; 2) I seek competition to constantly test and improve myself so I do not weaken; 3) I swear to speak no insult and demand it; 4) I speak the truth and demand it; 5) I take nothing not paid for and demand it; 6) I grant sovereignty to my kin and demand it; 7) I insure my people regardless of condition, and demand it; and in doing so leave nothing but voluntary markets of cooperation between sovereign men; and to discipline, enserf, enslave, ostracize or kill those who do otherwise; 8) to not show fear or cowardice, abandon my brothers, or retreat, and 9) to die a good death in the service of my kin, my clan, my tribe and my people.

    As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be an Aryan.

    I am a warrior in that 1) we will prepare for war so perfectly that none dare enter it against us. 2) Once we go to war, we do so with *joy*, with eagerness, and with passion, and without mercy, without constraint, and without remorse; And 3) before ending war, we shall defeat an enemy completely such that no other dares a condition of our enemy, and the memory of the slaughter lives a hundred generations.

    As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be a Warrior.

    As far as I know, if I succeed as a Pagan, as a Christian, as an Aryan, as a Warrior, then I have transcended the animal man, and earned my place among the saints, heroes, demigods, gods, in the memories, histories, and legends of man.

    And that is the objective of heroes.

    We leave the rest for ordinary men.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-29 09:46:00 UTC

  • ADVOCACY OF KETAMINE THERAPY As a trauma survivor myself, I would not wish on an

    ADVOCACY OF KETAMINE THERAPY

    As a trauma survivor myself, I would not wish on anyone the work it took me to leave it behind. And I have willpower few can imagine, and fewer can muster, and I also have had friends, partners, and family to help me. So I can’t recommend this ketamine (or hallucinogen) model (when controlled) enough. If the problem is trauma (memory) it can be fixed. If it is physical (immunological, or developmental) the individual will permanently need drugs to compensate. But if it’s trauma this family of treatments is both explicable (we can say why it works), has only lovely side effects, and is absurdly effective. Depression is pain. And it’s pain, largely from exhaustion, and exhaustion from trying to avoid trauma – each ‘revisitation’ (of memory) which reinforces it. These treatments create distance (separation) that allows you to easily retrain your brain. We are not talking 10 or 20% effectiveness here. We’re talking +70% effectiveness. It works.

    (Truth in Advertising: No I have not had this treatment, and I don’t have need to, although low dosing hallucinogens is common among my peers, and I’ve considered it for reaching peak performance. The data is just very, very, impressive whether formal (ketamine therapy by doctors) or informal (hallucinogens with friends). My brand of Aspiness is a sort of OCD-in-thought that seeks order in everything, and chemical assistance helps me change context rather than work myself to death. lol Which I seem to try to do at every opportunity.

    -cheers )

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-29 09:19:00 UTC

  • GRAMMARS —“How can grammar be Fictional?”— FIrst, see: Fictionalism (Stanfor

    https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/fictionalism/THE GRAMMARS

    —“How can grammar be Fictional?”—

    FIrst, see: Fictionalism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)

    https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/fictionalism/

    Next, technically speaking Grammar consists of rules of continuous disambiguation.

    You can follow me when I have the class on it becuase it’s some of the most interesting parts of my work

    For example, in temporal logic only so many words make sense.

    So, the grammar of temporal logic includes constraints on vocabulary.

    So when I talk about GRAMMARS I show how each grammatical structure (logic) does in fact limit vocabulary.

    As such if you stack the grammars from most simple to most complex, then vocabulary is a subset of grammar.

    So

    Cognitive ability of the mind

    >>> Grammars

    >>>>> Phonemes

    >>>>>> Vocabularies

    This is what I discovered while working with ‘the grammars’ and it’s one of the reasons I had to do so much work.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-28 14:59:00 UTC

  • ON THE CHURCH I think that people are easily confused between the the biblical s

    ON THE CHURCH

    I think that people are easily confused between the the biblical stories and our relation to god as absolutely horrific, and the church as a governing institution that developed and eventually implemented natural law.

    The Aryan version of “church” is the military (militia) and the law. But with massive invasion, over extension, and the loss of military discipline, that church (cult) fell to an underclass cult of superstition, and the sequestering of literacy to obscure the pretense of knowledge.

    Upon invasion by the vikings restoring militarism, and upon subsequent restoration of greek knowledge, and the development of printing, we escaped our dark ages, with the prussian state under frederick the most successful example of that restoration. And it resulted in the great intellectual leap of germans, the second industrial and scientific revolution in germany, and if not for the defeat of germany by the anti aryans (catholic france, all but catholic england, and orthodox russia, followed by Jewish (Soviet) Russia, Germany might have restored our ancient order to its full scientific and romantic pagan origins.

    I view Chesterson, Evola, Kirk and the others, like Kant as catastrophic failures trying to restore and preserve the invasion rather than continue our rescue from semitic deceit and barbarism. The fact that they stumbled upon vague half truths now and then doesn’t really impress me. Instead, look at the artists of the late 19th, the thought of the late 19th, and the science and technology and german academy of the 19th.

    Once you understand what makes the west is the militia and the oath and the feast, and that western man prohibited priests for very good reasons, requiring the aristocracy to perform the rituals instead, you understand how sick a disease is the church, and how it made us weak, and vulnerable, and remains our enemy.

    The church rediscovered natural law via aristotle via the scholastics. The church had the opportunity to reform. It has failed us. It has abandoned us, and now it works aggressively against us. And the mental diseases that the church gave us are why we are vulnerable to the ambitions of marxism and the lies of postmodernism.

    So, while we may need *A* church, in the sense that we need a sacred place – and the churches were intentionally located in our sacred groves – and while we may need history, advice, oath, and feast (the mass), we do not need lies, pilpul, and anything other than worship and appreciation of nature and our ancestors, from whom we can select hundreds of heroes to learn from, rather than a false god whose behavior is that of a demon, and whose consequences were our destruction and enslavement.

    WE BEGIN AND END WITH THE MILITIA.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-28 11:21:00 UTC

  • THEY INVENTED PILPUL BY WHICH TO INVERT THE INNOVATION OF GREEK REASON (TRUTH) I

    THEY INVENTED PILPUL BY WHICH TO INVERT THE INNOVATION OF GREEK REASON (TRUTH) INTO ANTI-REASON (LYING)

    (very important concept)

    You mean the people who gave us the undermining of the empire, and constant intentional insurrection, judaism, christianity, and islam and the resulting Abrahamic dark age and 750M dead, and who specialized in slaving, tax predation, and usury, did nothing at all for humanity despite being the most literate group in europe, when freed from ostracization gave us communism, the soviet secret police, the gulag, and 100M dead, the pseudosciences of marx, boas, freud, cantor, mises; gave us the distraction of rothbardian libertarianism, and the tragedy of trotsky-neoconservatism in america; and who invaded american academic institutions using the Frankfurt School out of Columbia; and who were instrumental in systematically undermining the constitution by financing specific cases that would force judicial activism, and who were the advocates and sponsors of the immigration act that accomplished through third world migration what their ideas could not: the second conquest of european civilization – this time through pseudoscientific propaganda, instead of supernatural propaganda; and today are the vastly disproportionate propagandists in globalism by which the multicultural low trust tribalism of the levant is spread to the homogenous high trust peoples of the west? Make no mistake about it. We are all responsible for bad things, but they are responsible for more deaths, dark ages, and destruction than all peoples and all natural events except for the great plagues and diseases. And the reason is simple: they invented Pilpul (abrahamism): the counter-to reason. In other words, they took the innovation of the greeks (idealism) and created it’s opposite (pilpul) by which to overload, load, frame, suggest, and obscure human reason.

    So no. No people has done more harm to humanity in all of human history.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-28 08:29:00 UTC

  • IT’S NOT 4D CHESS, IT’S JUST USING HUMAN NATURE (INCENTIVES). —“The South Kore

    IT’S NOT 4D CHESS, IT’S JUST USING HUMAN NATURE (INCENTIVES).

    —“The South Korean middle class was more afraid of Trump than they were of Kim, and this fear of the US, gave an unusually dovish South Korean government the political cover it needed to approach DPRK without being called ‘traitors’. If Trump actually understands what he did, then sure: he’s cosmic-brain-4th-dimensional-chess-deal-artist-God-Emporer.”— James Brittingham

    You don’t have to be that thoughtful, as much as just understand human nature. Trump is sensitive to status signals himself, and so he knows how to use them to influence others. In this case I suspect that his intuition was right and he simply collected enough information (or had it forced upon him by the general staff) and used people’s fear of his ‘uncertainty’.

    He is player. He plays people. It’s not complicated.

    I mean, “Listen, China, we don’t want our troops there any longer. I want to shrink the US presence abroad. If we come here and have to fix this problem, we’re gonna stay, and we’re gonna blame you for making us come here. So either fix this problem or have us on your fucking doorstep with everything we’ve got.”

    The chinese increase sanctions, trump doesn’t ‘disrespect’ kim by accepting a meeting with him (which is what kim wants, status), and the south koreans have to seize the opportunity because they’re afraid if they don’t Trump will simply be ‘unpredictable’ (which in east asian parlance is a very evil word).

    The south koreans and kim as actors, they get the ‘face’, (credit), the koreans show they are in control of their destiny, trump gets his win, and gets to be fawningly appreciative of all sides, and say it was always possible if his predecessors were f–ckheads.

    I mean, that’s the game.

    (I think very similarly, because I have read a great deal of military history and grand strategy, and applied it in business the same way he has – albeit at a much smaller scale. )

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-27 22:11:00 UTC

  • Yes, Stupid People Create More Crime

    YES, STUPID PEOPLE CREATE MORE CRIME People commit crimes across the spectrum. State and Local IQ corresponds to crime rates. Stupid people get caught more often. Stupid people tend to pursue low risk low reward crimes. (those requiring little planning and high opportunism) When it comes to murder a surprisingly high percentage of murderers are caught. I use the term evil 80’s but the average criminal has an IQ of 93, which only serves to confirm my position that while the median of the distribution is 100, the medium of the distribution needs to be above 106, and closer to 110, leaving a full standard deviation between the median and the border of criminality 95 to preserve a high trust society. But in general the evil 80’s (probably up to 95) demographic (a) is universally outcast, (b) undesirable even to each other, (c) cannot trust information, particularly from each other, (d) personalizes it to ‘oppression’ rather than “avoidance”, (e) justifies his behavior as retaliation for that treatment (f) is still smart enough to profit from immorality if not smart enough to profit from morality. (g) this includes the ability to practice all forms of criminal behavior and develop skill at avoiding being caught. Not surprisingly (which is worth noting) criminals consistently measure with lower verbal ability. Hence my arguments that I’m not sure that the primary evolution out of africa is almost entirely verbal. —“Lower verbal ability is due to the structure of the brain. The recognition of feeling occurs in the left hemisphere while the ability to speak is governed in the right. When there is a little cross over between the hemispheres alexithymia is common. Common in the people who demonstrate alexithymia are executive function defects.”— Liam Eddy So just as you see greater verbal ability in ashkenazi, greater spatial in east asians, a balance in whites, you see deficiencies in every other group. But out of these deficiencies, (a) personality defects (b) cultural reinforcement of those defects, and (c) lower verbal IQ – exaggerate the problem. Worse, the ‘multiplier’ is aggression. Meaning that the higher the aggression in the personality the more expressed is the criminality of low IQ. Again, this is why I’m a critic of adding peoples who have not undergone the manorial transformation (filter) to the european gene pool, and social and political orders. They bring with them permanently defective genes. We forget that the primary difference between whites and ashkenazi of same ability is aggression, and that this aggression is as much or more responsible for their ability to carry intellectual workloads as well as make use of their intelligence competitively. African americans are highly pro social (extroverted), but very negatively distributed, and even in that distribution they are negatively biased in verbal ability, AND they mature much earlier, faster, and deeper.

  • Yes, Stupid People Create More Crime

    YES, STUPID PEOPLE CREATE MORE CRIME People commit crimes across the spectrum. State and Local IQ corresponds to crime rates. Stupid people get caught more often. Stupid people tend to pursue low risk low reward crimes. (those requiring little planning and high opportunism) When it comes to murder a surprisingly high percentage of murderers are caught. I use the term evil 80’s but the average criminal has an IQ of 93, which only serves to confirm my position that while the median of the distribution is 100, the medium of the distribution needs to be above 106, and closer to 110, leaving a full standard deviation between the median and the border of criminality 95 to preserve a high trust society. But in general the evil 80’s (probably up to 95) demographic (a) is universally outcast, (b) undesirable even to each other, (c) cannot trust information, particularly from each other, (d) personalizes it to ‘oppression’ rather than “avoidance”, (e) justifies his behavior as retaliation for that treatment (f) is still smart enough to profit from immorality if not smart enough to profit from morality. (g) this includes the ability to practice all forms of criminal behavior and develop skill at avoiding being caught. Not surprisingly (which is worth noting) criminals consistently measure with lower verbal ability. Hence my arguments that I’m not sure that the primary evolution out of africa is almost entirely verbal. —“Lower verbal ability is due to the structure of the brain. The recognition of feeling occurs in the left hemisphere while the ability to speak is governed in the right. When there is a little cross over between the hemispheres alexithymia is common. Common in the people who demonstrate alexithymia are executive function defects.”— Liam Eddy So just as you see greater verbal ability in ashkenazi, greater spatial in east asians, a balance in whites, you see deficiencies in every other group. But out of these deficiencies, (a) personality defects (b) cultural reinforcement of those defects, and (c) lower verbal IQ – exaggerate the problem. Worse, the ‘multiplier’ is aggression. Meaning that the higher the aggression in the personality the more expressed is the criminality of low IQ. Again, this is why I’m a critic of adding peoples who have not undergone the manorial transformation (filter) to the european gene pool, and social and political orders. They bring with them permanently defective genes. We forget that the primary difference between whites and ashkenazi of same ability is aggression, and that this aggression is as much or more responsible for their ability to carry intellectual workloads as well as make use of their intelligence competitively. African americans are highly pro social (extroverted), but very negatively distributed, and even in that distribution they are negatively biased in verbal ability, AND they mature much earlier, faster, and deeper.

  • Why? To Invert Greek Reason Into Deception.

    THEY INVENTED PILPUL BY WHICH TO INVERT THE INNOVATION OF GREEK REASON (TRUTH) INTO ANTI-REASON (LYING) (very important concept) You mean the people who gave us the undermining of the empire, and constant intentional insurrection, judaism, christianity, and islam and the resulting Abrahamic dark age and 750M dead, and who specialized in slaving, tax predation, and usury, did nothing at all for humanity despite being the most literate group in europe, when freed from ostracization gave us communism, the soviet secret police, the gulag, and 100M dead, the pseudosciences of marx, boas, freud, cantor, mises; gave us the distraction of rothbardian libertarianism, and the tragedy of trotsky-neoconservatism in america; and who invaded american academic institutions using the Frankfurt School out of Columbia; and who were instrumental in systematically undermining the constitution by financing specific cases that would force judicial activism, and who were the advocates and sponsors of the immigration act that accomplished through third world migration what their ideas could not: the second conquest of european civilization – this time through pseudoscientific propaganda, instead of supernatural propaganda; and today are the vastly disproportionate propagandists in globalism by which the multicultural low trust tribalism of the levant is spread to the homogenous high trust peoples of the west? Make no mistake about it. We are all responsible for bad things, but they are responsible for more deaths, dark ages, and destruction than all peoples and all natural events except for the great plagues and diseases. And the reason is simple: they invented Pilpul (abrahamism): the counter-to reason. In other words, they took the innovation of the greeks (idealism) and created it’s opposite (pilpul) by which to overload, load, frame, suggest, and obscure human reason. So no. No people has done more harm to humanity in all of human history.

  • Why? To Invert Greek Reason Into Deception.

    THEY INVENTED PILPUL BY WHICH TO INVERT THE INNOVATION OF GREEK REASON (TRUTH) INTO ANTI-REASON (LYING) (very important concept) You mean the people who gave us the undermining of the empire, and constant intentional insurrection, judaism, christianity, and islam and the resulting Abrahamic dark age and 750M dead, and who specialized in slaving, tax predation, and usury, did nothing at all for humanity despite being the most literate group in europe, when freed from ostracization gave us communism, the soviet secret police, the gulag, and 100M dead, the pseudosciences of marx, boas, freud, cantor, mises; gave us the distraction of rothbardian libertarianism, and the tragedy of trotsky-neoconservatism in america; and who invaded american academic institutions using the Frankfurt School out of Columbia; and who were instrumental in systematically undermining the constitution by financing specific cases that would force judicial activism, and who were the advocates and sponsors of the immigration act that accomplished through third world migration what their ideas could not: the second conquest of european civilization – this time through pseudoscientific propaganda, instead of supernatural propaganda; and today are the vastly disproportionate propagandists in globalism by which the multicultural low trust tribalism of the levant is spread to the homogenous high trust peoples of the west? Make no mistake about it. We are all responsible for bad things, but they are responsible for more deaths, dark ages, and destruction than all peoples and all natural events except for the great plagues and diseases. And the reason is simple: they invented Pilpul (abrahamism): the counter-to reason. In other words, they took the innovation of the greeks (idealism) and created it’s opposite (pilpul) by which to overload, load, frame, suggest, and obscure human reason. So no. No people has done more harm to humanity in all of human history.