Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • What Makes Christianity Jewish, Not European?

    (very important ideas) What makes Christianity Jewish is the method of presentation (fictional history), the adaptation rather than homeric repetition (justification), the method of argument: pilpul(sophism), the demand for exclusivity (monotheism), the demand for submission(slave morality), the demand for obedience (law vs wisdom) rather than respect and tolerance, the demand for expansion (domination), divisiveness and demonization (poly-ethicalism – although christian is less so than judaism or islam), the primacy of priests and conformity(positive) rather than law and conflict resolution (negative), the maladaptivity (devolution) rather than adaptivity (markets), the genetics (dysgenic rather than eugenic), and the spreading of ‘sources of ignorance’ rather than knowledge and innovation. The fact that it has been called an opiate of masses is simply a medical truism, since that’s precisely what it does (literally). The fact that people spoke and wrote in greek, in greek-conquered lands, does not make them greek. What makes on the member of a group evolutionary strategy is their method of cooperation toward a given end. In the case of western vs semitic, it’s Truth, Correspondence, Heroism, Agency, Innovation, and Rule of Empirical Law, vs Lying, Non-Correspondence, Slavery, the absence of Agency, Stagnation and the Rule by Fictional Law. The historical problem facing aristocratic and masculine western man in curing himself of the underclass and effeminate infection of abrahamic sophism, is that empirical law, commerce, and science is simply practiced while literature is debated. Once you understand this, the parallel between judaism and marxism, and christianity and postmodernism is obvious: jewish pseudoscience and law that is non-correspondent, and christian literature and rationalism that is allegorical and non correspondent. They attempt to achieve by overloading reason, with framing obscurantism and suggestion, an appeal to intuition of the interpersonal experience, rather than informing us as to the limits of personal perception and experience and the use of measurements both physical and logical to extend it. The Abrahamisms are Sophisms by analogy, not Measurements by description. Western man measures the empirical to understand and defeat reality. Semitic man fictionalizes to ignore, and circumvent reality. Abrahamic fictionalism is the very opposite of Western Description. They tell fictions. We report on events. (Thus endeth the lesson) Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • The Role of Emotions

    Emotions are information. They inform us as to past, present, and future changes in state of capital (resources) environmental, physical, mental, social, and emotional. Our struggle in transcending from animal to human is knowing when that information is true, and when it is false for the circumstances. Since evolution seized the opportunity to surrender that choice to cognition, when possible. For those that have not transcended the animal, emotions remain their primary source of information. For those that have transcended the animal, our remaining emotions provide failover for when reason and calculation fail. It’s so that under temporal and resource pressure our decision making can ‘degrade’ gracefully. Unfortunately for women, raising infants, toddlers, children, and each other is for all intents and purposes irrational given the time between investment(action) and return (consequence). Just as for men, the value of those emotions and the time to integrate and react to them was a death sentence, given the high return on taking risks. So, particularly upon entering puberty, those emotions (information) are accentuated, while in men those emotions are destroyed – hence that strange feeling of ‘darkness’ during male tenage years without the excitement of war and the hunt. Gender specialization covers the entire spectrum of perception, memory, time, cognition, labor, advocacy, and negotiation. Our similarities are irrelevant for our cooperation, but our differences profound in choosing what we cooperate upon. In that division of perception, cognition and labor we produce a nash equilibrium of trading, thereby producing a pareto distribution of influence, and collectively defeat the dark forces of time and ignorance, in the slow incremental transcendence of man, from beast, to human, to the gods we imagine.

  • The Role of Emotions

    Emotions are information. They inform us as to past, present, and future changes in state of capital (resources) environmental, physical, mental, social, and emotional. Our struggle in transcending from animal to human is knowing when that information is true, and when it is false for the circumstances. Since evolution seized the opportunity to surrender that choice to cognition, when possible. For those that have not transcended the animal, emotions remain their primary source of information. For those that have transcended the animal, our remaining emotions provide failover for when reason and calculation fail. It’s so that under temporal and resource pressure our decision making can ‘degrade’ gracefully. Unfortunately for women, raising infants, toddlers, children, and each other is for all intents and purposes irrational given the time between investment(action) and return (consequence). Just as for men, the value of those emotions and the time to integrate and react to them was a death sentence, given the high return on taking risks. So, particularly upon entering puberty, those emotions (information) are accentuated, while in men those emotions are destroyed – hence that strange feeling of ‘darkness’ during male tenage years without the excitement of war and the hunt. Gender specialization covers the entire spectrum of perception, memory, time, cognition, labor, advocacy, and negotiation. Our similarities are irrelevant for our cooperation, but our differences profound in choosing what we cooperate upon. In that division of perception, cognition and labor we produce a nash equilibrium of trading, thereby producing a pareto distribution of influence, and collectively defeat the dark forces of time and ignorance, in the slow incremental transcendence of man, from beast, to human, to the gods we imagine.

  • Where Does an Attractive, Smart, Conservative Woman Find a Worthy Smart Man?

    WHERE DOES AN ATTRACTIVE, SMART, CONSERVATIVE WOMAN FIND A WORTHY SMART MAN? —“Where does a smart conservative woman find particularly high IQ men (who aren’t cold and unfeeling robots)?”— A tall order. (They’re Taken Quickly) Um. I’ll tell you the painful truth. That is that conservative high-iq women are nowhere near as attractive an investment as girly girls if for no other reason than the number of compromises you need to make with women who are peers. Secondly, girly girls will use more assets more liberally to obtain those men, and conform to their needs to hold them. Good men are few, and don’t go on the market. In my opinion good men are seduced or essentially stalked by women within three degrees of separation, who keep an inventory of candidates and seize opportunities. We all have down spots in relationships and that’s when men are vulnerable. Competitive men must be unfeeling – it is a job requirement so to speak, and the world rewards us for our unfeeling (Detachment). but the truth is that on average, men are more sentimental, loyal, and romantic than women for the simple reason they have fewer sources of affection than women. I’ve always gravitated to very smart women (one of the smarter women in america as a fact), and more stoic women, and have made a few very exceptions. But I cannot keep a relationship with a woman who isn’t smart. I’ve tried. I loved her. But you need to be friends and co-conspirators at some point, for the long term. So where do you find them? Social media (men’s friends lists) are absolutely positively the best current source of publicly available material. Chatting, finding an excuse to chat for ten minutes on an unrelated subject will tell a woman all she needs to know. block or ignore them afterward if they aren’t a possibility. Just leave it alone if they are. Men are very slow processors. You want their excitement to dissipate before you ping them again if you’re interested at all. Men are simple: keep them fit, fed, f–cked, and don’t mommy them at all, and you’ll get what you want out of them. There are no discounts on making sure he’s fit, fed, f—cked, and self directed. The primary problem i see today is that men are not fit, and between a woman working and raising children, their men are not fed and f—ked. And therefore they choose escape and resignation over self direction. Men need very little to survive. The only reason to do much other than bullshit with other men, is to get fed and f—ked. Fitness and self direction are just means to that end: getting fed and f—ked. Seriously. I have spent many years trying to explain how simple men are: very, very, very simple. ANd educated women have been taught so much drivel by feminists and postmodernists they’re literally invulnerable to the truth. EASTERN EUROPE AND RUSSIA…..

  • THE VIRTUE OF HISTORY POLY-HEROISM AS CIVIC RELIGION (important ideas) The probl

    THE VIRTUE OF HISTORY POLY-HEROISM AS CIVIC RELIGION

    (important ideas)

    The problem in producing a positive religion is providing a sufficient portfolio of virtues that people can select from and use to respond to differing circumstances.

    It’s the same with political orders. everyone wants to mandate an optimum when the romans know a long time ago that you give shit away when you’re prosperous, you run a market order most of the time, and you run a fascist generalship in times of war, with the only constant being rule of law (reciprocity) as the point of equilibrium between the two extremes.

    Hence my argument for real or semi-real historical figures, and enough of them so that we can call upon their example no matter what the conditions.

    The only reason not to is authoritarianism and as far as I know all religious people are closet authoritarians, whether they want to lead or follow, just as they care closet regressives by seeking static rules regardless of whether they do so for discounts on mental labor, or discounts on the work to compromise with those having different ends, or they want to rally people to their chosen reproductive strategy despite the fact it’s not in the interest of others to do so.

    Economic analysis explains everything and no matter what you do religious people lose. In fact, it’s pretty easy to argue that organized religion is the worse thing to happen to humanity in history.

    I mean, we already now that the source of all monotheistic religions was the failure of the indo-iranians to compete with the europeans, and therefore they spread west to escape them, but took the technology with them while inverting the aryan religion from one of defeating nature to one submissive to it.

    it’s very hard to tell people that their desire for predictability is suicidal and that it’s only trustworthiness despite unpredictability that produces goods. It’s very hard to tell people who are dedicated to fictionalisms in which they find comforts that they are destructive to humanity and the most regressive people living. But it’s simply a fact.

    I didn’t expect to end up here but then I have more intellectual honesty and moral courage than most people, and am more willing to be wrong than most people for reasons that were nothing to do with my own choice.

    Truth is truth. It is very hard to face it.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-08 13:43:00 UTC

  • WHERE DOES AN ATTRACTIVE, SMART, CONSERVATIVE WOMAN FIND A WORTHY SMART MAN? —

    WHERE DOES AN ATTRACTIVE, SMART, CONSERVATIVE WOMAN FIND A WORTHY SMART MAN?

    —“Where does a smart conservative woman find particularly high IQ men (who aren’t cold and unfeeling robots)?”—

    A tall order.

    Um. I’ll tell you the painful truth. That is that conservative high-iq women are nowhere near as attractive an investment as girly girls if for no other reason than the number of compromises you need to make with women who are peers.

    Secondly, girly girls will use more assets more liberally to obtain those men, and conform to their needs to hold them.

    Good men are few, and don’t go on the market. In my opinion good men are seduced or essentially stalked by women within three degrees of separation, who keep an inventory of candidates and seize opportunities. We all have down spots in relationships and that’s when men are vulnerable.

    Competitive men must be unfeeling – it is a job requirement so to speak, and the world rewards us for our unfeeling (Detachment). but the truth is that on average, men are more sentimental, loyal, and romantic than women for the simple reason they have fewer sources of affection than women.

    I’ve always gravitated to very smart women (one of the smarter women in america as a fact), and more stoic women, and have made a few very exceptions. But I cannot keep a relationship with a woman who isn’t smart. I’ve tried. I loved her.

    But you need to be friends and co-conspirators at some point, for the long term. So where do you find them?

    Social media (men’s friends lists) are absolutely positively the best current source of publicly available material. Chatting, finding an excuse to chat for ten minutes on an unrelated subject will tell a woman all she needs to know. block or ignore them afterward if they aren’t a possibility. Just leave it alone if they are. Men are very slow processors. You want their excitement to dissipate before you ping them again if you’re interested at all.

    Men are simple: keep them fit, fed, f–cked, and don’t mommy them at all, and you’ll get what you want out of them. There are no discounts on making sure he’s fit, fed, f—cked, and self directed.

    The primary problem i see today is that men are not fit, and between a woman working and raising children, their men are not fed and f—ked.

    And therefore they choose escape and resignation over self direction.

    Men need very little to survive. The only reason to do much other than bullshit with other men, is to get fed and f—ked. Fitness and self direction are just means to that end: getting fed and f—ked.

    Seriously. I have spent many years trying to explain how simple men are: very, very, very simple. ANd educated women have been taught so much drivel by feminists and postmodernists they’re literally invulnerable to the truth.

    EASTERN EUROPE AND RUSSIA…..

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-08 13:27:00 UTC

  • THE ROLE OF EMOTIONS Emotions are information. They inform us as to past, presen

    THE ROLE OF EMOTIONS

    Emotions are information. They inform us as to past, present, and future changes in state of capital (resources) environmental, physical, mental, social, and emotional.

    Our struggle in transcending from animal to human is knowing when that information is true, and when it is false for the circumstances. Since evolution seized the opportunity to surrender that choice to cognition, when possible.

    For those that have not transcended the animal, emotions remain their primary source of information. For those that have transcended the animal, our remaining emotions provide failover for when reason and calculation fail. It’s so that under temporal and resource pressure our decision making can ‘degrade’ gracefully.

    Unfortunately for women, raising infants, toddlers, children, and each other is for all intents and purposes irrational given the time between investment(action) and return (consequence). Just as for men, the value of those emotions and the time to integrate and react to them was a death sentence, given the high return on taking risks.

    So, particularly upon entering puberty, those emotions (information) are accentuated, while in men those emotions are destroyed – hence that strange feeling of ‘darkness’ during male tenage years without the excitement of war and the hunt.

    Gender specialization covers the entire spectrum of perception, memory, time, cognition, labor, advocacy, and negotiation. Our similarities are irrelevant for our cooperation, but our differences profound in choosing what we cooperate upon. In that division of perception, cognition and labor we produce a nash equilibrium of trading, thereby producing a pareto distribution of influence, and collectively defeat the dark forces of time and ignorance, in the slow incremental transcendence of man, from beast, to human, to the gods we imagine.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-08 12:52:00 UTC

  • REQUIREMENTS OF A RELIGION – TRANSFER NOT STASIS —“How do we sacralize (keep s

    REQUIREMENTS OF A RELIGION – TRANSFER NOT STASIS

    —“How do we sacralize (keep static) our value system, outside of religion? Christianity was the container, and will be again. We can modify which values are contained in it, but we need :

    1. A value system

    2. A way to transmit it to all classes (myth, feasts, spectacles)

    3. A way to keep the value system static (canonized)(burning heretics at the stake)

    Its obvious to me that this requires a monopoly institution. The only market for choosing between the monopolies is war. There can be no market for a sacralized value system. We allowed that and we got modernism.”—Bill Anderson

    SINCE WHEN IS STASIS A GOOD THING?

    it may be obvious to you but looking around the world (a) our value system isn’t from the church its from the having a commercial middle class, education, and the law, (b) man has discovered just about every imaginable way of training us into mindfulness. (c) we train with fairy tales, historical novels, bibliographies, histories, and the sciences.

    We have been through many waves of conquest by truth (reason) using deflationary grammars and conquest by lies (religion) using inflationary and conflationary grammars.

    Deflationary we innovate and prosper, conflationary we stagnate and suffer.

    So it doesn’t really matter what you intuit, because you are infected by the disease so to speak. Falsify those ideas by searching the world and you will find through the comparison of civilizations (japan being my favorite example in belonging, and switzerland being my favorite example in civic order).

    Your ideas cannot survive falsification. They can’t. Assuming one has intellectual honesty.

    Myth(commensurability on strategy), Ritual(mindfulness), Feast(calm belonging), Festival(excited belonging) and Markets (daily cooperation) work. They do. There is no evidence people need lies, they need commensurability so that they can cooperate with the least fear and doubt and insecurty, and the greatest optimism and trust.

    Conversely, primitive peoples were forced to compete with much more advanced peoples but they lacked commensurability due to tribalism, and lacked commerce due to primitivism. It’s not complicated. The problem is STATIC MEANS DEAD. And so it’s not that we must be static via positiva, but that we must be static VIA NEGATIVA (law).

    The very quest for the static as commensurability via positiva vs the dynamic as commensurability via negativa is the reason abrahamism was so stagnating under judaism, stagnating under christianity, and stagnating destructive and devolutinary under islam.

    Be careful what you value, for what you value may be simply ‘taking it easy’ such that you stagnate and devolve.

    THE RED QUEEN NEVER STOPS.

    Abrahamic religions, or any static religion, lets the red queen win.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-08 10:39:00 UTC

  • WHAT MAKES CHRISTIANITY JEWISH, NOT EUROPEAN? (very important ideas) What makes

    WHAT MAKES CHRISTIANITY JEWISH, NOT EUROPEAN?

    (very important ideas)

    What makes Christianity Jewish is the method of presentation (fictional history), the adaptation rather than homeric repetition (justification), the method of argument: pilpul(sophism), the demand for exclusivity (monotheism), the demand for submission(slave morality), the demand for obedience (law vs wisdom) rather than respect and tolerance, the demand for expansion (domination), divisiveness and demonization (poly-ethicalism – although christian is less so than judaism or islam), the primacy of priests and conformity(positive) rather than law and conflict resolution (negative), the maladaptivity (devolution) rather than adaptivity (markets), the genetics (dysgenic rather than eugenic), and the spreading of ‘sources of ignorance’ rather than knowledge and innovation. The fact that it has been called an opiate of masses is simply a medical truism, since that’s precisely what it does (literally).

    The fact that people spoke and wrote in greek, in greek-conquered lands, does not make them greek. What makes on the member of a group evolutionary strategy is their method of cooperation toward a given end. In the case of western vs semitic, it’s Truth, Correspondence, Heroism, Agency, Innovation, and Rule of Empirical Law, vs Lying, Non-Correspondence, Slavery, the absence of Agency, Stagnation and the Rule by Fictional Law.

    The historical problem facing aristocratic and masculine western man in curing himself of the underclass and effeminate infection of abrahamic sophism, is that empirical law, commerce, and science is simply practiced while literature is debated. Once you understand this, the parallel between judaism and marxism, and christianity and postmodernism is obvious: jewish pseudoscience and law that is non-correspondent, and christian literature and rationalism that is allegorical and non correspondent. They attempt to achieve by overloading reason, with framing obscurantism and suggestion, an appeal to intuition of the interpersonal experience, rather than informing us as to the limits of personal perception and experience and the use of measurements both physical and logical to extend it.

    The Abrahamisms are Sophisms by analogy, not Measurements by description. Western man measures the empirical to understand and defeat reality. Semitic man fictionalizes to ignore, and circumvent reality.

    Abrahamic fictionalism is the very opposite of Western Description. They tell fictions. We report on events.

    (Thus endeth the lesson)

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-08 09:51:00 UTC

  • JUST LOVE THEM AND LIMIT THEIR INFLUENCE TO THEIR DOMAIN OF COMPETENCE Love wome

    JUST LOVE THEM AND LIMIT THEIR INFLUENCE TO THEIR DOMAIN OF COMPETENCE

    Love women, dont argue with them. Let them believe their feelings are sources of knowledge. they are overwhelmed by them and lack agency because of them. And cannot function if they cannot trust them. Those feelings are temporally and individually valuable. just deny their application to scale and intertemporal conditions where feelings are relevant to individuals but outcomes relevant to the group regardless of individual feelings. we made the mistake of universal enfranchisement. women are not bad they are wonderful. but their intuitions of scale (political) are as useless as are male intuitions about carrying, nursing, and caring for infants. The problem with universal enfranchisement, is that while women can deny us interpersonal influence we can no longer deny them political influence. we are compatible only through trade, and by trade we calculate the nash optimum despite our differences in ability and interest. and by including women in the political we eliminated the female market for marriage as well as the male market for politics.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-08 07:53:00 UTC