Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • YOU CAN”T ARGUE WITH THE LEFT. ALL WE MUST DO IS CONTINUE TO CONVERGE ON A SOLUT

    YOU CAN”T ARGUE WITH THE LEFT. ALL WE MUST DO IS CONTINUE TO CONVERGE ON A SOLUTION TO OUR SELF PRESERVATION.

    You can’t argue with the left – that’s their whole point.

    (a) they don’t believe in truth, reason, or science – only power.

    (b) This means you cannot negotiate with them only use power.

    (c) The only power that will alter the course of events is not interpersonal but martial (revolutionary)

    The left lacks agency. They have collected a series of fictions into a religion of untruth, unreason, unscience, for the pursuit of power ,- just as did the christians, jews, and muslims: they operate by SELECTIVE DENIALISM.

    The most difficult challenge for libertarians (burghers) and conservatives (aristocracy), is our exhaustion of all opportunities for truth, compromise, and exchange.

    The left has adopted the female reproductive strategy of sheer numbers regardless of quality.

    The libertarian and right adopted the male strategy of quality and competitiveness instead of numbers.

    These reproductive strategies are attempts AT SPECIATION.

    We are finally able to afford to speciate by participating in the great sort make possible by male modernity.

    There is no solution but war, and extermination, or conquest or separation.

    I prefer separation and speciation. I will accept conquest and rule if necessary – though I believe it is destructive in the long term since our people disappear whenever we rule and commingle. I will not tolerate being conquered. And I will not tolerate the consequences of conquest which will lead to yet another dark age – without a reservoir of aryans to rescue us this time.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-01 12:30:00 UTC

  • DON’T GET ME WRONG. THE Q MOVEMENT CAN BECOME SELF-FULFILLING The fact that it’s

    DON’T GET ME WRONG. THE Q MOVEMENT CAN BECOME SELF-FULFILLING

    The fact that it’s nonsense doesn’t mean it’s not both effective, a narrative to rally around, and of sufficient potential that an increasingly scalable movement can form.

    Like religion, that which is not falsifiable is not open to argument. Just as the holocaust is a foundational myth, the Q-message of the deep state conspiracy can be a foundational myth.

    In other words, there is sufficient truth to form a mythos that serves as an ideological basis for a revolutionary movement rather than

    The Q method is exactly how the abrahamic religions were founded. The very same technique. This technique merely uses the anonymity of the internet rather than the anonymity of written and spoken gossip.

    So you know, this is one of those interesting things, which is that the founding mythos Q is proposing is not false. He is merely telling stories. Those stories are myths. In the sense that they construct a myth that is ‘true enough’ for action, even if not true enough for argument.

    And that is it’s strength.

    In fact, even if exposed, the mythos of the deep state conspiracy against western civlization – particularly it’s male, merit, market, excellence, and aristocratic properties – persists.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-01 09:55:00 UTC

  • LEARNING FROM MAO Mao went around and collected rural people to defeat the urban

    LEARNING FROM MAO

    Mao went around and collected rural people to defeat the urban people in favor of economic collectivism – the primitive tradition of his people. There is no reason we cannot go around and collect rural and suburban people and defeat the urban people in favor our kinship collectivism (nationalism). As I’ve said. This civil war is going to be fairly short, and fairly hard, but easily won by historic standards. People think in terms of ammunition but the purpose of ammunition is merely to keep people in the cities and to stop the rats as they flee. This doesn’t require direct fighting other than of those few police that side will initially side with the traitors and invaders. The population that is neutral or frightened, need only be given sufficient information about the desired future state to not interfere or support the enemy.

    A moral license, A set of demands and incentives, a plant of transition, a means of altering the status quo.

    The time is coming.

    Siege.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-01 09:31:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. —“WHAT DO YOU THINK OF THE QANON HOAX?”—

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    —“WHAT DO YOU THINK OF THE QANON HOAX?”—

    1) Great Question: As you said, (a) it’s a hoax (trick) not a fraud because it’s not for consideration(that I know of). (b) I am fairly sure it qualifies as entertainment. (c) I don’t see it as defamation. (d) Not sure it seeks to advocate for involuntary transfer. (e) Not sure it’s a conspiracy.

    2) (f) it’s pretty obvious he’s using the same techniques as ‘mediums’ (readers), (g) and so under a soft interpretation I would say it’s ‘for fun’. (h) but if a jury could be convinced it was causing harm to the informational commons, (which it could be) then: the demand would be for informational restitution, and punishment if the jury saw fit.

    3) Restitution would require what is required in most courts which is full confession (explanation), and equal republication thereof. Remember that a hoax (entertainment) and a fraud (theft) are quite different things.

    4) Remember that the purpose of the demand for truth is merely to suppress fraud for any kind of profit or advocacy of any moral hazard from which direct or indirect gains can be had. The market will determine the indeterminable – just as it always does.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-31 12:00:45 UTC

  • RELIGIONS (INITIATIC BROTHERHOODS) ARE GOOD IF NOT NECESSARY – THE ABRAHAMIC ONE

    RELIGIONS (INITIATIC BROTHERHOODS) ARE GOOD IF NOT NECESSARY – THE ABRAHAMIC ONES ARE BAD.

    —“That post-modernism is a plague thee is no question. That it can be compared to Abrahamism I have doubts… It also violently attacks Abrahamism (well, religion as a whole). It seems odd that it would repeat Jewish, Christian, and Islamic destruction of the the ancient world in the “modern world”? Since the modern world itself crumbles via these religions eroding”.— Luís F. Rodrigues

    The modern world does not crumble by those religions eroding whatsoever, because it is just a reformation of those religions.

    All of us (christians) are of the (stupid) illusion that christianity is a good rather than that religion (initiatic brotherhoods) are good.

    There are plenty of initiatic brotherhood models that work just fine. Christianity judaism and islamism are bad ones.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-31 10:50:00 UTC

  • AESTHETICS: EUROPEAN VS. ABRAHAMIST By @[100016659043273:2048:Daniel Gurpide] Ar

    AESTHETICS: EUROPEAN VS. ABRAHAMIST

    By @[100016659043273:2048:Daniel Gurpide]

    Art is the celebration of life, and the exploration of life in all its aspects. If life is unimportant—a mere diminutive prelude to the real life which is to begin with death—then art can only be of negligible importance.

    Greek humanism was superseded by Christianity: by a religion which divided man against himself, teaching him to view his body with shame, his emotions with suspicion, sensuality with fear, sexual love with feelings of guilt. This life, it taught, was a burden, this world a vale of tears—our endurance of which would be rewarded at death: the gateway to eternal bliss. This religion was, inevitably, anti-art and anti-life. The alienation of man from his own nature, especially from his emotional nature; the all-pervading hypocrisy to which this gave rise throughout the Christian era; the devaluation of life and of the world—and hence, inevitably, their wonderfulness; the conception of man as not a god but a worm, and a guilty one at that: all this is profoundly at odds with the creative impulse and its subject matter.

    The importance of the desert in biblical symbolism is clear: a desert that erases all representations and rejects them on behalf of the invisible and the uniform. Yahweh’s believer must consent to transforming the imagination into a desert, and this implies a ban on all representation.

    Not only are depictions of Yahweh forbidden, but also images of all worldly things—starting, of course, with man, who was created in God’s ‘image.’ It is not hard to find a clear anti-aesthetic bias in biblical iconoclasm.

    Christian art began as heresy. Transported to an art-loving people, Christianity became a religion more artistic than would have been the case had it remained in the hands of the Judeo-Christians. However, this came only from a long, slow process. In the Christianity of the first centuries, iconoclasm was the rule: the Mosaic prohibition of image representation was widely observed. The idea of the great ugliness of Jesus was also widespread (e.g., Tertullian, Origen, Clement of Alexandria). Only when the Church, following the compromise of Constantine, became more pagan did the birth and development of a Christian iconography become apparent. However, traces of iconoclasm may still be found in Byzantine ritual as well as Protestantism.

    Iconoclasm is also present in Islam, where the rare Arabic Muslim thinkers who concerned themselves with aesthetics tended to envision art only in abstract form.

    The emptying of human representation goes hand in hand with the abandonment of human particularity and diversity, for these are themselves images.

    Extensions of—and contemporary points of comparison with—the Mosaic ban on representation have often been sought, for example, in respect of abstract art, whose birth and development coincide, metaphorically, with that of Post-modernism and—experienced in concrete terms—with the internationalist ideal of the abolition of borders. ‘An entire aspect of Western modernity finds resonance with the old iconoclast exigency, and from this point forward, thinkers of Judaic filiation actively intervene at the tip of this modernity to mark out where it is going, not truly in opposition to it but rather in advance of it.’ (Jean-Joseph Goux, Les Iconoclastes)

    The contrast with the Indo-European world is striking. In the Bible, the beautiful is not necessarily good, and the ugly is not necessarily evil. It may even happen that good may be so precisely because of its ugliness, and, similarly, that evil is handsome precisely because it is evil. Lucifer is an angel glowing with light. The Devil will adorn himself with all the paraphernalia of seduction, whereas the arms of Yahweh, says Isaiah (53:2), have grown ‘as a root out of a dry ground, without beauty or comeliness to attract our eyes.’ In paganism, however, good cannot be separated from beauty; and this is normal, because the good is in form, the consummate forms of worldly things.

    Consequently, art cannot be separated from religion. Art is sacred. Not only may the gods be represented, but art is the means of their representation; and insofar as men perpetually assure them of representation, they possess full status of existence. All European spirituality is based on representation as mediation between the visible and the invisible. Beauty is the visible sign of what is good; ugliness is the visible sign not only of what is deformed or spoiled, but of what is bad.

    For the ancient Greeks, solemnity is inseparable from visual, tangible representation. It is through the fusion of the aesthetic and the sacred that religious sentiment attains its peak.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-31 09:14:00 UTC

  • The Last Word on Equality

    We are no different from any other domesticated animal. We control domesticated animal’s reproduction and evolve them for cooperation with us (use by us). We control human animal’s reproduction and evolve them for cooperation or not. The difference between groups is mostly sexual dimorphism, sexual maturity, and size of the underclass in relation to the upper middle class. In other words, our upper middle and upper classes do not differ because they converge on neoteny, dimorphism, intelligence and temperament and are less dependent upon peers for knowledge and decisions. Our working and lower classes diverge in lower neoteny, biased dimorphism, lower intelligence and less civil temperament. Like anna karinnena’s families, and like the range of domesticated animals, to produce a ‘human’ requires many genetic things to go right, and if any one of them goes wrong then we are less human and more animal. As such we have domesticated one another and ourselves over millennia of demand for increasingly complex forms of cooperation. We consider humans to be defined by communication using language, but this is just a complex form of signaling. instead, the definition of human vs animal is AGENCY. Equality does not exist. Even when we claim it’s a necessity under dispute resolution in the law of torts, it is our property that is treated equally – not us. As such it is the equality of our property that exists under rule of law. Everything else is both dishonest, pseudoscientific, and dysgenic. And advocacy of dysgenia is just a means of warfare and conquest on a longer time line. We are either producing agency (humans) or reducing agency (animals).

  • The Last Word on Equality

    We are no different from any other domesticated animal. We control domesticated animal’s reproduction and evolve them for cooperation with us (use by us). We control human animal’s reproduction and evolve them for cooperation or not. The difference between groups is mostly sexual dimorphism, sexual maturity, and size of the underclass in relation to the upper middle class. In other words, our upper middle and upper classes do not differ because they converge on neoteny, dimorphism, intelligence and temperament and are less dependent upon peers for knowledge and decisions. Our working and lower classes diverge in lower neoteny, biased dimorphism, lower intelligence and less civil temperament. Like anna karinnena’s families, and like the range of domesticated animals, to produce a ‘human’ requires many genetic things to go right, and if any one of them goes wrong then we are less human and more animal. As such we have domesticated one another and ourselves over millennia of demand for increasingly complex forms of cooperation. We consider humans to be defined by communication using language, but this is just a complex form of signaling. instead, the definition of human vs animal is AGENCY. Equality does not exist. Even when we claim it’s a necessity under dispute resolution in the law of torts, it is our property that is treated equally – not us. As such it is the equality of our property that exists under rule of law. Everything else is both dishonest, pseudoscientific, and dysgenic. And advocacy of dysgenia is just a means of warfare and conquest on a longer time line. We are either producing agency (humans) or reducing agency (animals).

  • Let Me Help: Understanding the Basics of Art

    DIMENSIONS OF MEASUREMENT There are three dimensions of art criticism: – Craftsmanship (includes materials) – Design (the play of order(composition) and bounty(beauty) and perception) – Content (the content and values of that content) All art can be judged by triangulation (comparison) along these three axis. There is no possible cardinality to art but ordinality can be achieved by recursive triangulation. ALL ART BEGINS WITH MONUMENTAL ARCHITECTURE AND DEVOLVES TO DECORATION AND HANDCRAFTS – Monumental Architecture is self selecting due to cost. – Monumental Sculpture is self selecting due to cost. – Monumental Painting is self selecting due to cost. – Life Size Representationalism (not photorealism) in painting is self selecting due to cost (hours). HOWEVER – Painting, Print, and Photography are not self selecting. They are middle, working, and lower class substitutes for monuments. – Even for the upper middle and upper class, and out-of-sight class, the few pieces of quality art that are canon (mentioned in art magazines and books, and references, or which had popular press) are inaccessible. Demand is just too high. So given the high signal value of art (yes it is an extreme expression of dominance), the market has had to experiment with novelty in order to satisfy demand. Much of what ordinary people rail against is the same as railing against fashion: for those in the fashion industries (of which display art is a member) novelty has to function as a substitute for scarcity of craftsmanship quality (note my particular distaste for the so called ‘art glass’ industry). AS SUCH – Monumental works convey ideas (allegiances, heroics, beauty) – The demand for low cost high production ‘decoration’ (a) may form an icon or ‘remembrance’. (b) may decorate the environment. (c) may reflect the monumental, life sized, and representational, is misplaced in non monumental size (which is what most of us intuit as great work). IN OTHER WORDS – Monumental work is misplaced in most homes and offices in market (business) and is generally reserved for the political and institutional and aristocratic. – Most homes cannot support monumental work and require only design (decoration). – Most people are actually not capable of design, or capable of acquiring the monumental. – As such the colorful, abstract, the impressionistic, are to homes as type design and color pallet are to print and display advertising. IN OTHER WORDS – when people purchase relatively well made ‘design’ (abstract, gestural, impressionistic) of architectural size (to fill a wall) they are practicing good aesthetics (not acting on pretense). – when people pay homage to the monumental in private spaces, they are practicing good aesthetics. (small engineering drawings, paintings of flowers, well constructed prints) – when people pay homage to the monumental in architectural spaces (your living room, hallway, or dining room, or office) you are (a) alienating others, and (b) PERSONAL: ALLORA AND I We purchased a detailed mezzotint (print) of an elaborately painstakingly made tree that is about four or five feet tall in all, and framed in a wide matte and black frame. This was the centerpeice of the livingroom between two custom made bookcases. And in the center of the living room we had a glass table with her art jewelry collection and work. And Allora decorated a hallway with dozens of small pieces of framed photographs, etchings, mezzotints, and collections of remembrances. THE DESTRUCTION OF WEST VIA DESTRUCTION OF ARTS LITERATURE HISTORY LAW AND SCIENCE. Allora and I were a rare couple because we were the last generation that could be ‘cultured’ – you actually can’t get an art education any longer. You can’t get a liberal arts education any longer (the whig history). The marxists have destroyed art on purpose just as they have destroyed literature, academics, law, and history. It is nearly impossible to ‘be cultured’ in the aristocratic sense any longer. And it was destroyed on purpose by (((the marxists, socialists and postmodernists))). WE MUST ONCE AGIAN BE WARRIORS SO OUR CHILDREN CAN BE COMPETITIVE SO OUR GRAND CHILDREN CAN BE ARTISTS.

  • Let Me Help: Understanding the Basics of Art

    DIMENSIONS OF MEASUREMENT There are three dimensions of art criticism: – Craftsmanship (includes materials) – Design (the play of order(composition) and bounty(beauty) and perception) – Content (the content and values of that content) All art can be judged by triangulation (comparison) along these three axis. There is no possible cardinality to art but ordinality can be achieved by recursive triangulation. ALL ART BEGINS WITH MONUMENTAL ARCHITECTURE AND DEVOLVES TO DECORATION AND HANDCRAFTS – Monumental Architecture is self selecting due to cost. – Monumental Sculpture is self selecting due to cost. – Monumental Painting is self selecting due to cost. – Life Size Representationalism (not photorealism) in painting is self selecting due to cost (hours). HOWEVER – Painting, Print, and Photography are not self selecting. They are middle, working, and lower class substitutes for monuments. – Even for the upper middle and upper class, and out-of-sight class, the few pieces of quality art that are canon (mentioned in art magazines and books, and references, or which had popular press) are inaccessible. Demand is just too high. So given the high signal value of art (yes it is an extreme expression of dominance), the market has had to experiment with novelty in order to satisfy demand. Much of what ordinary people rail against is the same as railing against fashion: for those in the fashion industries (of which display art is a member) novelty has to function as a substitute for scarcity of craftsmanship quality (note my particular distaste for the so called ‘art glass’ industry). AS SUCH – Monumental works convey ideas (allegiances, heroics, beauty) – The demand for low cost high production ‘decoration’ (a) may form an icon or ‘remembrance’. (b) may decorate the environment. (c) may reflect the monumental, life sized, and representational, is misplaced in non monumental size (which is what most of us intuit as great work). IN OTHER WORDS – Monumental work is misplaced in most homes and offices in market (business) and is generally reserved for the political and institutional and aristocratic. – Most homes cannot support monumental work and require only design (decoration). – Most people are actually not capable of design, or capable of acquiring the monumental. – As such the colorful, abstract, the impressionistic, are to homes as type design and color pallet are to print and display advertising. IN OTHER WORDS – when people purchase relatively well made ‘design’ (abstract, gestural, impressionistic) of architectural size (to fill a wall) they are practicing good aesthetics (not acting on pretense). – when people pay homage to the monumental in private spaces, they are practicing good aesthetics. (small engineering drawings, paintings of flowers, well constructed prints) – when people pay homage to the monumental in architectural spaces (your living room, hallway, or dining room, or office) you are (a) alienating others, and (b) PERSONAL: ALLORA AND I We purchased a detailed mezzotint (print) of an elaborately painstakingly made tree that is about four or five feet tall in all, and framed in a wide matte and black frame. This was the centerpeice of the livingroom between two custom made bookcases. And in the center of the living room we had a glass table with her art jewelry collection and work. And Allora decorated a hallway with dozens of small pieces of framed photographs, etchings, mezzotints, and collections of remembrances. THE DESTRUCTION OF WEST VIA DESTRUCTION OF ARTS LITERATURE HISTORY LAW AND SCIENCE. Allora and I were a rare couple because we were the last generation that could be ‘cultured’ – you actually can’t get an art education any longer. You can’t get a liberal arts education any longer (the whig history). The marxists have destroyed art on purpose just as they have destroyed literature, academics, law, and history. It is nearly impossible to ‘be cultured’ in the aristocratic sense any longer. And it was destroyed on purpose by (((the marxists, socialists and postmodernists))). WE MUST ONCE AGIAN BE WARRIORS SO OUR CHILDREN CAN BE COMPETITIVE SO OUR GRAND CHILDREN CAN BE ARTISTS.