Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • NORWAY —“Norway’s modern manufacturing and welfare system rely on a financial

    NORWAY

    —“Norway’s modern manufacturing and welfare system rely on a financial reserve produced by exploitation of natural resources, particularly North Sea oil.”—

    Look. I have a non-trivial understanding of economics. Norway is the Scandinavian version of Dubai. The Dubai has 4 billion barrels and Norway has 5.5 billion barrels in reserve. Just like Dubai can operate on a resource economy, Norway can. For exactly the same reasons.

    —“Forty years of oil and gas production has produced values of $1.2 trillion for Norway and the petroleum sector accounts for 22% of Norway’s GDP. The petroleum industry has enabled one of the most extensive welfare systems in the world, with free public health care and generous disability and unemployment benefits. To provide a buffer when the petroleum revenues decrease the Government Pension Fund was established in 1990 and its current value is over $500 billion. The so-called spending rule, made effective in 2001, states that only the real returns of the fund (estimated to be 4% per annum) should be spent in the national budget, thus saving oil wealth for future generations.”—

    At current rates of consumption Norway has (optimistically) 24 years of oil production left. In other words, one new generation. After that it will dwindle. We can expect Norway to incrementally tighten r

    Dubai is investing in becoming the arab world’s switzerland, and norway is investing in fulfilling the scandinavian utopia. While dubai’s objective is sustainable, norway’s is not.

    Norway is not repeatable any more than Dubai is repeatable. And norway will change rapidly in the foreseeable future because of it.

    That’s the answer.

    YOU CAN’T DO SOCIALISM (FOR LONG).

    In the end it destroys everything. Corruption and black markets, Incentives to produce most importantly, prices and calculation and the impossibility of organizing production, and knowledge. Just can’t be done. It can be done in a few industries. But there is no escape from market forces any more than there is from gravity.

    Eugenicists were right. There is only one route to permanent prosperity and that is the reduction of the unproductive classes. The bottom is 6x more damaging than the top is productive. and in an evenly rotating economy (no major asymmetries of technology) which the world is approaching, the size of the underclasses will determine the level of poverty.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-05 21:25:00 UTC

  • —“Curt: What’s European? and What About the Balkans?”—

    (Possibly controversial? Shouldn’t be.) This is a great question I think a lot of us wrestle with: what does ‘european’ mean. “EUROPE”: EUROPE IS A FEDERATION OF CIVILIZATIONS OF CLOSE GENETIC RELATIONS OF THE WESTERN INDO EUROPEANS across the northern hemisphere: The Circumpolar Civilization EUROPA Europea refers to the territory Between the Atlantic in Portugal and the Urals, and from the arctic to Sicily. CIRCUMPOLAR CIVILIZATION Siberia that territory east of the Urals to the pacific. The fact that Alaska, Canada and Greenland are isolated from Siberia is an artifact of political history. Greater european civilization effectively controls the northern hemisphere, south to the mediterranean, central asian deserts and mountain ranges of east asia. EUROPE CONTAINS THESE CIVILIZATIONS: Southern Route Shepherds 1 – OLD EUROPE (Southern Route Shepherds – black hair) 2 – SOUTHERN EUROPE (Catholic Europe below hajnal line) Northern Route Cattle Raiders 3 – WESTERN EUROPE (Protestant Europe above hajnal line – anything bordering the north and baltic seas, including the baltics – brown hair and blonde hair) 4 – EASTERN EUROPE (slavic speaking non-russian europe – brown hair and blonde hair – modernized by german expansion.) 5 – RUSSIA (Russian speaking europe – not modernized by german commercial expansion) With regard to russia, the demographics at present suggest that as long as russia prevents asian immigration, that they will have effectively settled and conquered siberia, since the native population there is about the same as the native population in the north americas (tiny). TEST OF “EUROPEAN” My understanding of “European” requires: 1) European Territory -And- 2) Culturally Christian: Protestant, Catholic, Orthodox -And- 3) Genetically and Culturally New European (Aryan – northern migration path above the black sea via the european plain) -Or- Genetically Old European (southern migration path via following the water ways). BALKANS I consider the territory old europe (it is) I consider the people byzantine (old european) not new European (they are). I consider the region a ‘torn civilization’ or (borderland) or ‘failed civilization’ once it was conquered by the muslims. (it is) It is weak for no reason other than Byzantium and the trade routes are occupied by the Turkish Muslims (previous northeast eurasians) FAILED CIVILIZATION Or put it differently, I agree with the Russians that orthodox (byzantine) civilization was defeated and ‘ruined’ and that old Europe cannot be restored without aggressive intentional restoration. This is what the Russian thought leadership dreams of doing. My view is that if they can create rule of law then they can. Until they create rule of law not. RUSSIAN ATTEMPTS AT RESTORATION Had Russia constrained her expansion to orthodoxy rather than slavic countries, they would have probably succeeded in the great power game. By threatening germany they cost germans prussia but they set the stage for their failure. Both russia and germany lost, and the anglos and latins won. This was not a good thing since russia and germany are the fortress against the east. The Arabs where effective in destroying eastern (Byzantine/Anatolian) Christendom which encircled the mediterranean, and threw north Africa, the levant, Anatolia and Persia into darkness ignorance and dysgenia. They justify this creation of impoverishing monopoly as ‘making us all the same’ which is precisely the OPPOSITE of what produces prosperity: markets, competition, differences. Most of islamic tradition takes advantage of self destructive intuitions (monopoly, empires, submission) and labels them goods when the counter-intuitive (markets, city and nation states, and agency) produce prosperity. What we want is not what is good for us. Just as wanting drugs is not good for us. RELIGIOUS INCOMPATIBILITY BECAUSE OF NORMS AND LAWS Religion = Law, so I do not agree with religious tolerance whatsoever. Cults and heresies are one thing. Competing religions are another. Religious competition is just low velocity warfare. Immigration of nonprofessionals more than single digits is just low velocity warfare. If rituals differ this means nothing. If tradition, custom, norm and law differ, then this means everything. My definition of ‘white’ is the same as my definition of ‘european’. Things are defined not so much by what we say they are, but by what we say they are not. No more excuses for the (((rentier))) immigrants. -cheers.

  • —“Curt: What’s European? and What About the Balkans?”—

    (Possibly controversial? Shouldn’t be.) This is a great question I think a lot of us wrestle with: what does ‘european’ mean. “EUROPE”: EUROPE IS A FEDERATION OF CIVILIZATIONS OF CLOSE GENETIC RELATIONS OF THE WESTERN INDO EUROPEANS across the northern hemisphere: The Circumpolar Civilization EUROPA Europea refers to the territory Between the Atlantic in Portugal and the Urals, and from the arctic to Sicily. CIRCUMPOLAR CIVILIZATION Siberia that territory east of the Urals to the pacific. The fact that Alaska, Canada and Greenland are isolated from Siberia is an artifact of political history. Greater european civilization effectively controls the northern hemisphere, south to the mediterranean, central asian deserts and mountain ranges of east asia. EUROPE CONTAINS THESE CIVILIZATIONS: Southern Route Shepherds 1 – OLD EUROPE (Southern Route Shepherds – black hair) 2 – SOUTHERN EUROPE (Catholic Europe below hajnal line) Northern Route Cattle Raiders 3 – WESTERN EUROPE (Protestant Europe above hajnal line – anything bordering the north and baltic seas, including the baltics – brown hair and blonde hair) 4 – EASTERN EUROPE (slavic speaking non-russian europe – brown hair and blonde hair – modernized by german expansion.) 5 – RUSSIA (Russian speaking europe – not modernized by german commercial expansion) With regard to russia, the demographics at present suggest that as long as russia prevents asian immigration, that they will have effectively settled and conquered siberia, since the native population there is about the same as the native population in the north americas (tiny). TEST OF “EUROPEAN” My understanding of “European” requires: 1) European Territory -And- 2) Culturally Christian: Protestant, Catholic, Orthodox -And- 3) Genetically and Culturally New European (Aryan – northern migration path above the black sea via the european plain) -Or- Genetically Old European (southern migration path via following the water ways). BALKANS I consider the territory old europe (it is) I consider the people byzantine (old european) not new European (they are). I consider the region a ‘torn civilization’ or (borderland) or ‘failed civilization’ once it was conquered by the muslims. (it is) It is weak for no reason other than Byzantium and the trade routes are occupied by the Turkish Muslims (previous northeast eurasians) FAILED CIVILIZATION Or put it differently, I agree with the Russians that orthodox (byzantine) civilization was defeated and ‘ruined’ and that old Europe cannot be restored without aggressive intentional restoration. This is what the Russian thought leadership dreams of doing. My view is that if they can create rule of law then they can. Until they create rule of law not. RUSSIAN ATTEMPTS AT RESTORATION Had Russia constrained her expansion to orthodoxy rather than slavic countries, they would have probably succeeded in the great power game. By threatening germany they cost germans prussia but they set the stage for their failure. Both russia and germany lost, and the anglos and latins won. This was not a good thing since russia and germany are the fortress against the east. The Arabs where effective in destroying eastern (Byzantine/Anatolian) Christendom which encircled the mediterranean, and threw north Africa, the levant, Anatolia and Persia into darkness ignorance and dysgenia. They justify this creation of impoverishing monopoly as ‘making us all the same’ which is precisely the OPPOSITE of what produces prosperity: markets, competition, differences. Most of islamic tradition takes advantage of self destructive intuitions (monopoly, empires, submission) and labels them goods when the counter-intuitive (markets, city and nation states, and agency) produce prosperity. What we want is not what is good for us. Just as wanting drugs is not good for us. RELIGIOUS INCOMPATIBILITY BECAUSE OF NORMS AND LAWS Religion = Law, so I do not agree with religious tolerance whatsoever. Cults and heresies are one thing. Competing religions are another. Religious competition is just low velocity warfare. Immigration of nonprofessionals more than single digits is just low velocity warfare. If rituals differ this means nothing. If tradition, custom, norm and law differ, then this means everything. My definition of ‘white’ is the same as my definition of ‘european’. Things are defined not so much by what we say they are, but by what we say they are not. No more excuses for the (((rentier))) immigrants. -cheers.

  • Sovereignty Not Property.

    Private Property arose everywhere – but Sovereignty arose in the aryan expansion. We strangely emphasize private property which is not unique over Sovereignty which was unique. It was in greco-roman world it was institutionalized at scale. It was in the middle ages that it became extendable to a middle class. It was in the late middle ages and early modern period it became extendable to all. The rest of the world DRAMATICALLY OBJECTS to Sovereignty. They view community property as something they require or they will be left behind, excluded, and without insurance. Only Aryans consider ourselves sovereign, and our property an extension of the self. Hence why we kept alive the judicial duel. Justice will be served by the sovereign men of the community to prevent the externalization of harm to the community. But each man is sovereign, just as is any sovereign nation, and as such may fight for his life and property should he believe justice fails. But a man must earn his sovereignty before he can so use it. And the only way is demonstrated investment in the reciprocal insurance of other sovereigns. This requires miitary service, in defense of the private and commons, policing the private and common, and possession of capital that provides reciprocal demonstration of worth and incentive for loyalty.

  • Sovereignty Not Property.

    Private Property arose everywhere – but Sovereignty arose in the aryan expansion. We strangely emphasize private property which is not unique over Sovereignty which was unique. It was in greco-roman world it was institutionalized at scale. It was in the middle ages that it became extendable to a middle class. It was in the late middle ages and early modern period it became extendable to all. The rest of the world DRAMATICALLY OBJECTS to Sovereignty. They view community property as something they require or they will be left behind, excluded, and without insurance. Only Aryans consider ourselves sovereign, and our property an extension of the self. Hence why we kept alive the judicial duel. Justice will be served by the sovereign men of the community to prevent the externalization of harm to the community. But each man is sovereign, just as is any sovereign nation, and as such may fight for his life and property should he believe justice fails. But a man must earn his sovereignty before he can so use it. And the only way is demonstrated investment in the reciprocal insurance of other sovereigns. This requires miitary service, in defense of the private and commons, policing the private and common, and possession of capital that provides reciprocal demonstration of worth and incentive for loyalty.

  • There Can Be No Hypocracy in Postmodernism

    by Austyn Pember There is no hypocrisy – only strategies of deceit for self-interest: – The left is not hypocritical. They set up or use your moral framework as a tool against you. Whatever moral justification they are using to have their interests met is just a practical strategy of achieving said interests. they do not believe in truth, reciprocity, principle, reason, or science – only power. – When they say “you are a racist,” they are using your moral guilt about that principle against you. They don’t actually adhere to the premise that ‘racism is bad’. It’s only that they don’t want yourself or your demographic resisting against the thing they are championing or demographic they are aligning themselves with – they do not believe in truth, reciprocity, principle, reason, or science – only power. This can be shown when they are perfectly fine with ‘racism’ against whites, like the latest NYT editor. ALL VIOLATION OF RECIPROCITY VIOLATES NATURAL LAW – AND ALL VIOLATION OF NATURAL LAW GRANTS LICENSE AND AUTHORITY FOR THE USE OF EXTRA-LEGAL ACTION.

  • There Can Be No Hypocracy in Postmodernism

    by Austyn Pember There is no hypocrisy – only strategies of deceit for self-interest: – The left is not hypocritical. They set up or use your moral framework as a tool against you. Whatever moral justification they are using to have their interests met is just a practical strategy of achieving said interests. they do not believe in truth, reciprocity, principle, reason, or science – only power. – When they say “you are a racist,” they are using your moral guilt about that principle against you. They don’t actually adhere to the premise that ‘racism is bad’. It’s only that they don’t want yourself or your demographic resisting against the thing they are championing or demographic they are aligning themselves with – they do not believe in truth, reciprocity, principle, reason, or science – only power. This can be shown when they are perfectly fine with ‘racism’ against whites, like the latest NYT editor. ALL VIOLATION OF RECIPROCITY VIOLATES NATURAL LAW – AND ALL VIOLATION OF NATURAL LAW GRANTS LICENSE AND AUTHORITY FOR THE USE OF EXTRA-LEGAL ACTION.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. THERE CAN BE NO HYPOCRACY IN POSTMODERNISM by

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    THERE CAN BE NO HYPOCRACY IN POSTMODERNISM
    by Austyn Pember

    There is no hypocrisy – only strategies of deceit for self-interest:

    – The left is not hypocritical. They set up or use your moral framework as a tool against you. Whatever moral justification they are using to have their interests met is just a practical strategy of achieving said interests. they do not believe in truth, reciprocity, principle, reason, or science – only power.

    – When they say “you are a racist,” they are using your moral guilt about that principle against you. They don’t actually adhere to the premise that ‘racism is bad’. It’s only that they don’t want yourself or your demographic resisting against the thing they are championing or demographic they are aligning themselves with – they do not believe in truth, reciprocity, principle, reason, or science – only power.

    This can be shown when they are perfectly fine with ‘racism’ against whites, like the latest NYT editor.

    ALL VIOLATION OF RECIPROCITY VIOLATES NATURAL LAW – AND ALL VIOLATION OF NATURAL LAW GRANTS LICENSE AND AUTHORITY FOR THE USE OF EXTRA-LEGAL ACTION.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-04 17:37:07 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. SOVEREIGNTY NOT PROPERTY. Private Property ar

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    SOVEREIGNTY NOT PROPERTY.

    Private Property arose everywhere – but Sovereignty arose in the aryan expansion. We strangely emphasize private property which is not unique over Sovereignty which was unique. It was in greco-roman world it was institutionalized at scale. It was in the middle ages that it became extendable to a middle class. It was in the late middle ages and early modern period it became extendable to all. The rest of the world DRAMATICALLY OBJECTS to Sovereignty. They view community property as something they require or they will be left behind, excluded, and without insurance. Only Aryans consider ourselves sovereign, and our property an extension of the self.

    Hence why we kept alive the judicial duel. Justice will be served by the sovereign men of the community to prevent the externalization of harm to the community. But each man is sovereign, just as is any sovereign nation, and as such may fight for his life and property should he believe justice fails.

    But a man must earn his sovereignty before he can so use it.
    And the only way is demonstrated investment in the reciprocal insurance of other sovereigns.

    This requires miitary service, in defense of the private and commons, policing the private and common, and possession of capital that provides reciprocal demonstration of worth and incentive for loyalty.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-04 17:26:53 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. —“CURT: WHAT’S EUROPEAN? AND WHAT ABOUT THE

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    —“CURT: WHAT’S EUROPEAN? AND WHAT ABOUT THE BALKANS?”—

    (Possibly controversial? Shouldn’t be.)

    This is a great question I think a lot of us wrestle with: what does ‘european’ mean.

    “EUROPE”: EUROPE IS A FEDERATION OF CIVILIZATIONS OF CLOSE GENETIC RELATIONS OF THE WESTERN INDO EUROPEANS across the northern hemisphere: The Circumpolar Civilization

    EUROPA
    Europea refers to the territory Between the Atlantic in Portugal and the Urals, and from the arctic to Sicily.

    CIRCUMPOLAR CIVILIZATION
    Siberia that territory east of the Urals to the pacific. The fact that Alaska, Canada and Greenland are isolated from Siberia is an artifact of political history. Greater european civilization effectively controls the northern hemisphere, south to the mediterranean, central asian deserts and mountain ranges of east asia.

    EUROPE CONTAINS THESE CIVILIZATIONS:
    Southern Route Shepherds
    1 – OLD EUROPE (Southern Route Shepherds – black hair)
    2 – SOUTHERN EUROPE (Catholic Europe below hajnal line)
    Northern Route Cattle Raiders
    3 – WESTERN EUROPE (Protestant Europe above hajnal line – anything bordering the north and baltic seas, including the baltics – brown hair and blonde hair)
    4 – EASTERN EUROPE (slavic speaking non-russian europe – brown hair and blonde hair – modernized by german expansion.)
    5 – RUSSIA (Russian speaking europe – not modernized by german commercial expansion) With regard to russia, the demographics at present suggest that as long as russia prevents asian immigration, that they will have effectively settled and conquered siberia, since the native population there is about the same as the native population in the north americas (tiny).

    TEST OF “EUROPEAN”
    My understanding of “European” requires:
    1) European Territory
    -And-
    2) Culturally Christian: Protestant, Catholic, Orthodox
    -And-
    3) Genetically and Culturally New European (Aryan – northern migration path above the black sea via the european plain)
    -Or-
    Genetically Old European (southern migration path via following the water ways).

    BALKANS
    I consider the territory old europe (it is)
    I consider the people byzantine (old european) not new European (they are).
    I consider the region a ‘torn civilization’ or (borderland) or ‘failed civilization’ once it was conquered by the muslims. (it is) It is weak for no reason other than Byzantium and the trade routes are occupied by the Turkish Muslims (previous northeast eurasians)

    FAILED CIVILIZATION
    Or put it differently, I agree with the Russians that orthodox (byzantine) civilization was defeated and ‘ruined’ and that old Europe cannot be restored without aggressive intentional restoration. This is what the Russian thought leadership dreams of doing. My view is that if they can create rule of law then they can. Until they create rule of law not.

    RUSSIAN ATTEMPTS AT RESTORATION
    Had Russia constrained her expansion to orthodoxy rather than slavic countries, they would have probably succeeded in the great power game. By threatening germany they cost germans prussia but they set the stage for their failure. Both russia and germany lost, and the anglos and latins won. This was not a good thing since russia and germany are the fortress against the east.

    The Arabs where effective in destroying eastern (Byzantine/Anatolian) Christendom which encircled the mediterranean, and threw north Africa, the levant, Anatolia and Persia into darkness ignorance and dysgenia. They justify this creation of impoverishing monopoly as ‘making us all the same’ which is precisely the OPPOSITE of what produces prosperity: markets, competition, differences. Most of islamic tradition takes advantage of self destructive intuitions (monopoly, empires, submission) and labels them goods when the counter-intuitive (markets, city and nation states, and agency) produce prosperity. What we want is not what is good for us. Just as wanting drugs is not good for us.

    RELIGIOUS INCOMPATIBILITY BECAUSE OF NORMS AND LAWS
    Religion = Law, so I do not agree with religious tolerance whatsoever. Cults and heresies are one thing. Competing religions are another. Religious competition is just low velocity warfare. Immigration of nonprofessionals more than single digits is just low velocity warfare.

    If rituals differ this means nothing. If tradition, custom, norm and law differ, then this means everything.

    My definition of ‘white’ is the same as my definition of ‘european’.

    Things are defined not so much by what we say they are, but by what we say they are not.

    No more excuses for the (((rentier))) immigrants.

    -cheers.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-04 13:45:22 UTC