Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45119279_10156741213577264_219901608

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45119279_10156741213577264_219901608

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45119279_10156741213577264_2199016087251582976_o_10156741213572264.jpg —“You have all just made Gab a nationally recognized brand as the home of free speech online at a time when Silicon Valley is stifling political speech”— Andrew Torba, CEO, Gab.comAndrey SokoloffI wasn’t using gab much before… will now. Also tired of 30 day band for minor ”violations.”Oct 29, 2018, 12:11 PMJeff UrizenTrump should switch to gabOct 29, 2018, 12:11 PMBernard HoltPretty sure Gab is downOct 29, 2018, 12:31 PMCurt Doolittlethis is the current homepage. they will be up shortlyOct 29, 2018, 12:40 PMRoy BlackheartAre you going to be on GAB when it comes back up?Oct 29, 2018, 12:47 PMCurt Doolittlei have an account yesOct 29, 2018, 12:49 PMVincenzo LaSalaVerified nobodies. Classic.Oct 29, 2018, 1:46 PMMiles KeenanGoing gabOct 29, 2018, 1:52 PMRafael AureliusIf only there were some kind of censorship resistant payment method that anyone in the world could use to pay for Gab.Oct 29, 2018, 2:44 PMJean LeonardI signed up last night, but I probably don’t have time for it.Oct 29, 2018, 4:11 PMBen HartselleAndrew is copeposting hereOct 29, 2018, 8:07 PMBen HartselleYa but even if they used it, the problem would be getting it into and out of fiat to pay employees, vendors, etc.

    It’s the choke points of ed entry and exit into the banking system.

    I always figured a major use case for crypto would be freedom from government interference, not an oppressive corporate theocracy.

    20012 libertarian me BTFOOct 29, 2018, 8:18 PMCurt Doolittlelink?Oct 29, 2018, 8:30 PMBen HartselleI mean that Andrew’s above post is probaby copeposting. Daily Stormer went through all this before, they broke completely new ground in getting censored, and were reduced to publishing on TOR periodically while Weev worked out solution after solution.

    If the eye of Sauron/big tech gets focused on you, it’s VERY difficult to continually come up with constant workarounds and maintain your business.

    If DS wasn’t essentially one publisher, a writing staff and one of the world’s top security researchers doing pro-bono work for the site full-time, they’d still be permanently off the Internet.

    If weev (ironically banned from Gab) and AA don’t see a long term solution after working on it for a year, and one of /ourguys/ trying to BUY A BANK to build a new payment processor with $100,000,000 and stopped from doing so, we’re running out of options within the current Internet ecosystem.

    But by all means, remove all other options for us to exert our will and spread our ideas.Oct 29, 2018, 8:52 PMMichael KabanoffWould make sense. Lure all the ‘extremists’ to one site where they are easier to monitorOct 30, 2018, 1:39 AMDougium RingThat’s because the transition hasn’t happened yet. The whole point of crypto is to move beyond the necessity of fiatOct 30, 2018, 3:27 AMJim LeisWe expect this shit from the left. But it’s the libertarians who’s heads should be spinning while they argue that every private company has the right to deplatform Gab.Oct 30, 2018, 7:44 AMCurt Doolittle^ Never happen. Fiat = Shares in the Economy. What *WILL* happen is multiple fiat currencies for the multiple purposes. This will change economics dramatically. If necessary the states will crush competing currencies as otherwise they cannot respond to war and shock.Oct 30, 2018, 9:37 AMDougium RingProof of work and proof of stake in crypto are consistent with types of shares in the economy.Oct 30, 2018, 10:03 AMCurt Doolittleno. they are uninsured. the state insures. crypto doesn’t and cant. which is precisely why fiat money exists and is more advantagous than all other forms of money combined: insurability.Oct 30, 2018, 10:09 AMDougium RingI’m aware that the state insures. It is entirely possible, and I believe likely, that the creation of insured notes via trusted institution (state) based on crypto will be a form of fiat, similar to the gold backed dollar.Oct 30, 2018, 10:17 AM—“You have all just made Gab a nationally recognized brand as the home of free speech online at a time when Silicon Valley is stifling political speech”— Andrew Torba, CEO, Gab.com http://Gab.com

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-29 12:04:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/45119279_10156741213577264_21990160

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/45119279_10156741213577264_21990160

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/45119279_10156741213577264_2199016087251582976_o_10156741213572264.jpg —“You have all just made Gab a nationally recognized brand as the home of free speech online at a time when Silicon Valley is stifling political speech”— Andrew Torba, CEO, Gab.comAndrey SokoloffI wasn’t using gab much before… will now. Also tired of 30 day band for minor ”violations.”Oct 29, 2018 12:11pmJeff UrizenTrump should switch to gabOct 29, 2018 12:11pmBernard HoltPretty sure Gab is downOct 29, 2018 12:31pmCurt Doolittlethis is the current homepage. they will be up shortlyOct 29, 2018 12:40pmRoy BlackheartAre you going to be on GAB when it comes back up?Oct 29, 2018 12:47pmCurt Doolittlei have an account yesOct 29, 2018 12:49pmVincenzo LaSalaVerified nobodies. Classic.Oct 29, 2018 1:46pmMiles KeenanGoing gabOct 29, 2018 1:52pmRafael AureliusIf only there were some kind of censorship resistant payment method that anyone in the world could use to pay for Gab.Oct 29, 2018 2:44pmJean LeonardI signed up last night, but I probably don’t have time for it.Oct 29, 2018 4:11pmBen HartselleAndrew is copeposting hereOct 29, 2018 8:07pmBen HartselleYa but even if they used it, the problem would be getting it into and out of fiat to pay employees, vendors, etc.

    It’s the choke points of ed entry and exit into the banking system.

    I always figured a major use case for crypto would be freedom from government interference, not an oppressive corporate theocracy.

    20012 libertarian me BTFOOct 29, 2018 8:18pmCurt Doolittlelink?Oct 29, 2018 8:30pmBen HartselleI mean that Andrew’s above post is probaby copeposting. Daily Stormer went through all this before, they broke completely new ground in getting censored, and were reduced to publishing on TOR periodically while Weev worked out solution after solution.

    If the eye of Sauron/big tech gets focused on you, it’s VERY difficult to continually come up with constant workarounds and maintain your business.

    If DS wasn’t essentially one publisher, a writing staff and one of the world’s top security researchers doing pro-bono work for the site full-time, they’d still be permanently off the Internet.

    If weev (ironically banned from Gab) and AA don’t see a long term solution after working on it for a year, and one of /ourguys/ trying to BUY A BANK to build a new payment processor with $100,000,000 and stopped from doing so, we’re running out of options within the current Internet ecosystem.

    But by all means, remove all other options for us to exert our will and spread our ideas.Oct 29, 2018 8:52pmMichael KabanoffSo Gab is essentially a honey pot operation 😏?Oct 30, 2018 1:39amMichael KabanoffWould make sense. Lure all the ‘extremists’ to one site where they are easier to monitorOct 30, 2018 1:39amMichael KabanoffLet’s all move to MySpace.Oct 30, 2018 1:39amDougium RingThat’s because the transition hasn’t happened yet. The whole point of crypto is to move beyond the necessity of fiatOct 30, 2018 3:27amJim LeisWe expect this shit from the left. But it’s the libertarians who’s heads should be spinning while they argue that every private company has the right to deplatform Gab.Oct 30, 2018 7:44amCurt Doolittle^ Never happen. Fiat = Shares in the Economy. What *WILL* happen is multiple fiat currencies for the multiple purposes. This will change economics dramatically. If necessary the states will crush competing currencies as otherwise they cannot respond to war and shock.Oct 30, 2018 9:37amDougium RingProof of work and proof of stake in crypto are consistent with types of shares in the economy.Oct 30, 2018 10:03amCurt Doolittleno. they are uninsured. the state insures. crypto doesn’t and cant. which is precisely why fiat money exists and is more advantagous than all other forms of money combined: insurability.Oct 30, 2018 10:09amDougium RingI’m aware that the state insures. It is entirely possible, and I believe likely, that the creation of insured notes via trusted institution (state) based on crypto will be a form of fiat, similar to the gold backed dollar.Oct 30, 2018 10:17am—“You have all just made Gab a nationally recognized brand as the home of free speech online at a time when Silicon Valley is stifling political speech”— Andrew Torba, CEO, Gab.com http://Gab.com

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-29 12:04:00 UTC

  • “CURT, WILL YOU TAKE ON THE PHYSICS COMMUNITY TOO?”— (via the web site) TL;DR

    —“CURT, WILL YOU TAKE ON THE PHYSICS COMMUNITY TOO?”—

    (via the web site)

    TL;DR version: “No”. 😉 But it’s a good example of how to use testimonialism to test competing theories.

    —“Hi Curt, I have been following you on Facebook for several months and enjoy reading your ideas. I had been gradually moving away from Libertarianism, and Propertarianism clarified my skepticism of the former and connected many dots.”—

    Welcome then. Glad I could help. 😉 We’re all in this together it seems…. lol

    —“However, it became clear to me that you’ve missed a few things, most notably the century of fraud in physics (Quantum Mechanics). As far as I can tell, a particular anti-scientific philosophy (Kant) gave way to the rejection of fundamental scientific principles like absolute space, cause and effect, and identity. A group of mostly German physicists (Bohr, Heisenberg, Mach, Schrodinger etc) weren’t capable of solving the electron classically, and having adopted the aforementioned philosophy, devised the foundations of contemporary physics. Despite discordance with classic laws and experimentation, they invented (justified) their work with nonsense, claiming that classic laws breakdown at the subatomic level and that things could exist and not simultaneously. And they could only predict the behavior of Hydrogen (QM breaks down for everything higher on the periodic table). This has given us about a century of physics bullshit, like the currently fashionable multiverse theory, rampant curve fitting, and string theory. In the late 1980s, Hermann Haus derived the nonradiation condition, which coincidentally addressed a major problem pre-WW1 physicists faced: why electrons didn’t radiate energy under acceleration. One of his students, Randall Mills, was able to solve the electron using exclusively classic physics (Newtonian mechanics, Maxwells equations, special relativity, and Haus’s nonradiation condition). This was a revolution that few people know about to this day. And it permits the classical solution of a variety of other problems (molecular bonding, the unification of all physical forces, behaviors of fundamental particles, where gravity comes from, falsifying the Big Bang since the the universe perpetually oscillates). He also discovered that Hydrogen could go below the “ground state” (not really the ground state) and become one of a variety of nonradiative states he calls Hydrinos. Hydrinos are the Dark Matter that makes up nearly all of the universe. Mills has formed a company, Brilliant Light Power, that is working to commercialize applications of his work, primarily by utilizing Hydrinos as a novel energy source. I mention this because firstly, Mills’ story, and the corruption in physics, neatly adheres to your description of cognitive biases. It’s worth investing time to learn about. Secondly, the technological implications are extraordinary. Assuming he brings something to market soon, this will turn out to be the ultrasound imate black swan event. The end of all conventional energy sources, the end of the prevailing geopolitical order, the end of conventional transportation sources, and potentially the end of government as we know it. From my vantage point, this could be one hell of a plot twist to the revolution you’re predicting. “—

    I’m aware of this of line of argument of course but it is a book length treatment (or more), that I don’t have the time, will, skill or credibility to put together … and I have my own field to deal with… lol

    I falsify scientific work by searching for categories of consistent human error, very much like a psychologist or social scientists looks for examples of cognitive and social bias. If I don’t find those I deflate the argument and test whether the person is making a claim for which the knowledge upon which such a claim, is not dependent. And worse, if I find evidence of deception due to incentives. Most of scientific research that is questionable today consists of problems of statistical difficulty with insufficient preservation of constant relations because of a lack of operational knowledge or understanding, and because of the DENIAL of the OBVIOUS UNDERLYING MODEL.

    The physicists are having a problem (I THINK) because the underlying model is obviously in conflict with the frame of reference necessary to measure their experiments. But I don’t think that’s a particularly uncommon perception. I think they just don’t know what else to do until they stumble (reverse engineer) that model by a lot of trial and error.

    So while there are many competing theories, and I won’t address the one you mention specifically, you are correct (in part) on the origin of the frame of reference (model problem), it’s amplified even more so by the Mathiness Problem (mathematical idealism), and because of math the set problem, and together by the series of formulae they use that DO predict MOST. So I see them as prisoners from multiple dimensions, the philosophical one being the most distant – and I just dont think I can hold those people off in an argument they way I can theologians, philosophers, mathematicians, economists, jurists, and political scientists. I mean, it’s going to take someone with more of a vested interest in it than I am to work through that problem. And it is not a problem of ‘deceit’ as it is in economics, politics, and law. Just … well… a waste of a lot of pencils.

    —“As a side note, why did you put ads on your website? They look terrible and cause the site to regularly reload, interrupting the reader. Get rid of them ASAP. They’re making you look bad.”—

    I did not put ads on the site. It is because of the free hosting program forces them into the site. I have reasons for doing what I do. And no I don’t like it either. But for the present moment when I need to be able to move everything instantly, this is the most efficient method. I prefer to keep everything offshore. It’s just hard to do that at the moment for a host of reasons.

    Thank you very much for the thoughtful idea.

    Let’s keep fighting the good fight.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-28 18:49:00 UTC

  • The Form of Government Necessary and Why

    October 28th, 2018 10:19 AM THE FORM OF GOVERNMENT NECESSARY AND WHY (important concepts) [T]he form of government necessary for a people depends upon their demographic distribution, homogeneity, and the size of the middle class, because the middle class generates demand for rule of law, and the state generates demand for income from the wealth the middle class generates. So in the competition between rule of law and rule by man, demand is driven by conditions. This market is created by the competition for profits by the middle classes and their employees vs rents by the state and their dependents, with the principle difference being that the state can more easily concentrate startup capital and market advantage for heavy capital industries at the cost of corruption – and while the private sector cannot so easily produce the capital and market advantage through trade policy, the private sector can better utilize that capital and suppress state corruption since market competition suppresses rents. For historical reasons (geography, militia order, and ‘competitive’ bipartite manorialism), the west evolved cross-family corporations rather than intra-family clans, and as such superior trust, superior ability to produce commons because of it, and as such superior ability to generate large scale private sector organizations with greater innovation and returns on capital. Just as social orders became anchored (religion) during the age of transformation (the restoration after the bronze age collapse) societies became anchored during the industrial transformation after the Abrahamic Collapse (judaism,christianity,islam: the semitic – turkic invasion). Fukuyama attributed the success of european bureaucracy to its development prior to democracy. Because, despite his stated positions, his analysis favors the sino tradition of monolithic bureaucracy. Cheers.

  • The Occult Is One of The Fictionalist Grammars. It’s Just Neurologically Cheaper

    October 28th, 2018 10:14 AM THE OCCULT IS ONE OF THE FICTIONALIST GRAMMARS. HERE IS WHY IT WORKS. CLASSES OF PACKS.

    —“I think occult literature is to exercise and train the mind. Seeing the world through symbolism and allegory gives you a more well rounded world view. The imagination training alone to keep a sharp inner vision is worth the effort.”– Zack Sunday

    Contrast with:

    —“I started following your new friends. I think I just gagged on an Ebola”— a friend —“Evola is Harry Potter for the resurgent right.”—Neil A. Bucklew

    —“It’s cool, it’s hip, and it’s accessible. You read something like Metaphysics of War, and it’s not that different from The Fellowship of the Ring. Same beautifully constructed sentences, full of poetic words, riddled with lofty nouns that are inevitably capitalized like the philosophical texts of old. One of my favourites is when they capitalize Truth (whatever the fuck that’s supposed to mean). Who the fuck wants to read this “operational”, “via negativa” garbage, whatever that is? It all looks like computer code to me and that stuff is for nerds, right? These kids grew up with this stuff, this poison from Arktos and Counter-Currents. And what’s more, they will never, for the life of them, consider that maybe – just maybe – they shouldn’t trust these jesters and their sources, all of which are rooted in religious texts. You see, atheism or even agnosticism, those aren’t options; those are the tools of the Left. Surely, we cannot espouse the opinions of the Left, so instead, we will regress further and further and become ever more backward until this vile, leftist materialism and its child, despicable Science, are utterly obliterated and replaced with a spiritually transcendent society, which will be guided by religious texts, “perennial truths”, that were totally not written by fools and deceptive human beings, but instead written by people possessed by powerful, metaphysical forces, the names of which are once again capitalized for effect and this perverted stack of lies continues getting higher and higher and higher..”—by Göran Dahl —“We live in a natural world. The Mere belief in an old order and the mere feeling of how that order looks like or how it would look like in this age is not the right way to re-evolve it. Evola and Doolittle are observing the same thing, but the holes of Doolittle’s sieve are much smaller compared to those of Evola’s. If Evola and Doolittle are to observe, for example, the solar system, Evola would propose that the reason a planet orbits the sun is that its matter has some kind of tendency for orbiting or a sort of motility. But Doolittle WILL explain that the reason a planet orbits the sun is a central force which varies exactly inversely as the square distance from the center. Now what I’m aiming at is that while Evola knows exactly what he wants to impose, he lacks A THEORY, he lacks a scientific language that would’ve helped him in understanding what he intuited, and therefore he fell into many traps, one of them is the savior myth. What we need is a scientific research paper that uses measurements and organizational charts not intuitions and poetic licenses.”–by Ahmed Reda

    —“I dont understand why people are so blind to the point of fact that it is necessary to hit a problem from multiple angles ….. We need the Evolas, Doolittles, Spencer’s, Trumps, IEs, nordfronts, TWPs, Dark enlightenments, Molyneuxs…. if even for the sole purpose of competition to strengthen the winners in their respective actionsets.”—Austyn Pember

    — CURT — SENTIMENTS: IT’S JUST NEUROLOGICALLY CHEAPER The Occult? Fiction? Sophisms? [I]ts actually just easier (cheaper) – to reduce dependence upon reason and memory, and let the connections be made by free association and suggestion. (it is easier to be programmed than to program the self) These free associations cast a broader opportunity net at the expense of deduction and inference. When you say ‘well rounded’ that’s nonsense. when you say ‘cheaper and easier with greater reach for opportunity’ that’s true. So, increase precision with calculation and computation, and decrease precision with reason and more so with intuition. There is a correlation between age and dependence upon intuition vs reason. There is a correlation between isolation and dependence on intuition vs reason. I can intuit those relationships but I don’t feel comfortable stating the causality yet, although it does remind me of the feeling testosterone produces, that in turn, increases the radius of our awareness and thought in males as we mature. I suspect that this is the causal relationship between neural economy, state of endocrine development, and accumulated knowledge. -Curt Doolittle

  • Operations (real) vs Sets (ideal)

    October 28th, 2018 8:43 AM AGAIN: OPERATIONS (REAL) VS SETS (IDEAL) – CANTOR AS AN EXAMPLE OF THE PROBLEM IN MATHEMATICS AND BY EXTENSION EVERYTHING.

    —“Ok but Cantor’s work is specifically set-theoretic, not analytical. Also, an infinite sum is by definition a sum over a countable set. So cantor’s notions are in fact relevant for this.”—Alex Pareto

    [Y]es it is a sacred cow because people who are (knowingly or unknowingly) mathematical platonists are just as indoctrinated into superstitious nonsense as people who are indoctrinated into platonism proper, and people indoctrinated into theology. They know how to DO what they do (meaning make arguments with the objects, relations, and values of their vocabulary and grammar) but they don’t know how and why what they do functions. Frequencies are the scientific description and infinities (sizes) the fictional (imaginary) description. The difference is that those of us who work in the sciences, where we CANNOT engage in Platonism, because that is the purpose of science: to prevent such ‘magical’ speech, and instead force us to undrestand the causal relations between reality and our speech. So in this case a number consists of nothing more than the name of a position. That’s it. Mathematics consists of the vocabulary and grammar of positional names. Nothing more. Period. We generate positional names by the process of positional naming. We can scientifically describe that process as did Babbage, Turing, and Computer Science (consisting of nothing but addition), with gears, or the positional equivalent of gears (positional names), or the electronic-switch(memory) of positional names, and use these gears to produce positional names and operations on positional names at varying speeds. We can also tell a ‘story’ about those things (a fiction) which is what we do with literary, symbolic, and set mathematics. And then we can tell a fairy tale about sets, as if they are an equivalent to red riding hood. But no matter what we do, operationally, (scientifically) all we can do is produce a series of positional names faster or slower than another series of positional names. Ergo, there exists only one name “infinity” for “unknown limit of operations” and different rates (frequencies) by which we generate positional names, using any set of operations with which we produce positional names. This is why mathematics ‘went off the rails’ into fictionalism despite Poincare’s and others efforts at the beginning of the 20th century. Math is just the use of positional names which have only one property: position, and therefore only ONE constant relation: position. All logic consists of the study of constant relations, and as such mathematics provides the most commensurable language of constant relations, since it has only ONE constant relation: position.

  • Grammars Matter

    October 28th, 2018 8:38 AM GRAMMARS MATTER: COMPACT MONOPOLY CONFLATIONARY STAGNANT DYSGENIC VS DIFFERENTIATED MARKET DEFLATIONARY EVOLUTIONARY, EUGENIC SOCIAL ORDERS (important concepts)

    —“You might want to take a look at Eric Voegelin’s distinction between “compact” and “differentiated” symbolic systems.”– Chip Sills

    [I] understand it but it’s psychological not scientific and I work with the scientific model instead. In the end we face problems of computational cost (neural economy), and the grammars (models, objects, relations, values) that allow us to calculate (make comparisons, judgements, plans), offset by the frictions of status(face), and our order’s demand for either status(public/economic) or face (familial/personal), and local competition (homogeneity vs heterogeneity) and the institutions(norms, traditions, values, formal institutions) that arise from those conditions in the geography we sustain ourselves within. Simple people need simple anthropomorphic means of computation by free association (dream state, imagination, intuition) and more sophisticated people require means of calculation and computation that are increasingly more precise than the limits of human scale present in anthropomorphic models(grammars). So simple people and civilizations use high context/low precision grammars, and more complex civilizations use low context/high precision grammars. And our languages slowly evolve into “pidgins’ for high context, and large vocabulary nouns in low context for lower cognitive load, and for higher precision at the cost of higher cognitive load. So what Vogelin refers to as compact vs differentiated is an insightful version, rendering the choice psychological or arbitrary, where I use more precise, higher precision, terms and definitions, that expose the causes and consequences, and the non-arbitrariness of the relationship. Moreover, the CONFLATIONARY structure of MONOPOLY (monotheistic) religions and the MARKET structure of western civilization (poly grammatical) provides some of the best evidence of how monotheism (compact, monopoly, conflationary) models are easier to understand, but produce of necessity ignorance , stagnation, decline, and dysgenia. I hope this helps.

  • The Form of Government Necessary and Why

    October 28th, 2018 10:19 AM THE FORM OF GOVERNMENT NECESSARY AND WHY (important concepts) [T]he form of government necessary for a people depends upon their demographic distribution, homogeneity, and the size of the middle class, because the middle class generates demand for rule of law, and the state generates demand for income from the wealth the middle class generates. So in the competition between rule of law and rule by man, demand is driven by conditions. This market is created by the competition for profits by the middle classes and their employees vs rents by the state and their dependents, with the principle difference being that the state can more easily concentrate startup capital and market advantage for heavy capital industries at the cost of corruption – and while the private sector cannot so easily produce the capital and market advantage through trade policy, the private sector can better utilize that capital and suppress state corruption since market competition suppresses rents. For historical reasons (geography, militia order, and ‘competitive’ bipartite manorialism), the west evolved cross-family corporations rather than intra-family clans, and as such superior trust, superior ability to produce commons because of it, and as such superior ability to generate large scale private sector organizations with greater innovation and returns on capital. Just as social orders became anchored (religion) during the age of transformation (the restoration after the bronze age collapse) societies became anchored during the industrial transformation after the Abrahamic Collapse (judaism,christianity,islam: the semitic – turkic invasion). Fukuyama attributed the success of european bureaucracy to its development prior to democracy. Because, despite his stated positions, his analysis favors the sino tradition of monolithic bureaucracy. Cheers.

  • The Occult Is One of The Fictionalist Grammars. It’s Just Neurologically Cheaper

    October 28th, 2018 10:14 AM THE OCCULT IS ONE OF THE FICTIONALIST GRAMMARS. HERE IS WHY IT WORKS. CLASSES OF PACKS.

    —“I think occult literature is to exercise and train the mind. Seeing the world through symbolism and allegory gives you a more well rounded world view. The imagination training alone to keep a sharp inner vision is worth the effort.”– Zack Sunday

    Contrast with:

    —“I started following your new friends. I think I just gagged on an Ebola”— a friend —“Evola is Harry Potter for the resurgent right.”—Neil A. Bucklew

    —“It’s cool, it’s hip, and it’s accessible. You read something like Metaphysics of War, and it’s not that different from The Fellowship of the Ring. Same beautifully constructed sentences, full of poetic words, riddled with lofty nouns that are inevitably capitalized like the philosophical texts of old. One of my favourites is when they capitalize Truth (whatever the fuck that’s supposed to mean). Who the fuck wants to read this “operational”, “via negativa” garbage, whatever that is? It all looks like computer code to me and that stuff is for nerds, right? These kids grew up with this stuff, this poison from Arktos and Counter-Currents. And what’s more, they will never, for the life of them, consider that maybe – just maybe – they shouldn’t trust these jesters and their sources, all of which are rooted in religious texts. You see, atheism or even agnosticism, those aren’t options; those are the tools of the Left. Surely, we cannot espouse the opinions of the Left, so instead, we will regress further and further and become ever more backward until this vile, leftist materialism and its child, despicable Science, are utterly obliterated and replaced with a spiritually transcendent society, which will be guided by religious texts, “perennial truths”, that were totally not written by fools and deceptive human beings, but instead written by people possessed by powerful, metaphysical forces, the names of which are once again capitalized for effect and this perverted stack of lies continues getting higher and higher and higher..”—by Göran Dahl —“We live in a natural world. The Mere belief in an old order and the mere feeling of how that order looks like or how it would look like in this age is not the right way to re-evolve it. Evola and Doolittle are observing the same thing, but the holes of Doolittle’s sieve are much smaller compared to those of Evola’s. If Evola and Doolittle are to observe, for example, the solar system, Evola would propose that the reason a planet orbits the sun is that its matter has some kind of tendency for orbiting or a sort of motility. But Doolittle WILL explain that the reason a planet orbits the sun is a central force which varies exactly inversely as the square distance from the center. Now what I’m aiming at is that while Evola knows exactly what he wants to impose, he lacks A THEORY, he lacks a scientific language that would’ve helped him in understanding what he intuited, and therefore he fell into many traps, one of them is the savior myth. What we need is a scientific research paper that uses measurements and organizational charts not intuitions and poetic licenses.”–by Ahmed Reda

    —“I dont understand why people are so blind to the point of fact that it is necessary to hit a problem from multiple angles ….. We need the Evolas, Doolittles, Spencer’s, Trumps, IEs, nordfronts, TWPs, Dark enlightenments, Molyneuxs…. if even for the sole purpose of competition to strengthen the winners in their respective actionsets.”—Austyn Pember

    — CURT — SENTIMENTS: IT’S JUST NEUROLOGICALLY CHEAPER The Occult? Fiction? Sophisms? [I]ts actually just easier (cheaper) – to reduce dependence upon reason and memory, and let the connections be made by free association and suggestion. (it is easier to be programmed than to program the self) These free associations cast a broader opportunity net at the expense of deduction and inference. When you say ‘well rounded’ that’s nonsense. when you say ‘cheaper and easier with greater reach for opportunity’ that’s true. So, increase precision with calculation and computation, and decrease precision with reason and more so with intuition. There is a correlation between age and dependence upon intuition vs reason. There is a correlation between isolation and dependence on intuition vs reason. I can intuit those relationships but I don’t feel comfortable stating the causality yet, although it does remind me of the feeling testosterone produces, that in turn, increases the radius of our awareness and thought in males as we mature. I suspect that this is the causal relationship between neural economy, state of endocrine development, and accumulated knowledge. -Curt Doolittle

  • Continentalism, Nationalism, State Capitalism.

    October 28th, 2018 9:24 AM CONTINENTALISM, NATIONALISM, STATE CAPITALISM. [O]ne world government, monopoly, authoritarian communism vs continentalism, nationalism, state capitalism. Why is that a difficult choice, versus empires or one-empire of world government? India for Indians, Europa-America-Australia for Europeans, “Semitica” for Semites, Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, South America for South Americans and Amerindians, Pacifica for Pacificans. Why this arrangement under many nation states is other than optimum is extremely difficult to understand. We could all build walls and be at peace with one another. Good fences and good walls make good neighbors. There is no ‘human right’ to access the civilization of European people. Our ancestors worked very hard to eliminate the ‘familialism and tribalism’ of the other civilizations. Only the Europeans (Atlantic-Germanic-Slavs), and the East Asians Han-Korean-Japanese) have achieved it. And only the hindus have produced as ‘kind’ a social order despite the burden of their demographics. The chinese have chip on their shoulder due to the century of embarrassment. The africans need nothing but time and defense against the horrors of islam. and all of us need defense against the horrors of Semitica – expansionary islamism. Only the west is ‘naive’ and trusting (Foolish) enough not to defend herself from conquest.