THE SECRET TO TEACHING MEN: EXHAUSTIVE KING OF THE HILL.
Teaching men is really easy: Bait them into dominance play.
Just as exhaustive forgiveness in tit-for-tat is the optimum cooperative strategy, exhaustive baiting for dominance play is the optimum MALE cooperative strategy.
WTF do you think shit-talking amounts to? Are you fking thick?
(See what I did there?)
Set up King of the Hill games where ANY forward progress gets the men recognition. Do not criticize failure, only cowardice, attention seeking, or time wasting.
If you are too predictable you will ruin the game. You must present a variety of challenges.
We cannot feel ‘good’ about learning by conformity the way girls and women do. We must play at fighting or it’s not worth our time.
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/49620942_10156898980787264_1644820273611931648_n_10156898980782264.jpg DUAL CITIZENSHIP FOR DUAL LOYALTYAndrea Royall“A house divided cannot stand”… the only honest thing Honest Abe ever uttered…Jan 6, 2019, 9:37 AMGlen DanielsAll Jews are offered the right of return. How many of these people have actually applied for this? Pretending it’s a deliberate ploy for congressional influence is out of context. (Not that I’m even 1% in favor of anything on the Democrat platform)Jan 6, 2019, 9:39 AMAndrea RoyallTo hold both citizenships I believe the application of right of return is a foregone conclusion.Jan 6, 2019, 9:41 AMDarryl CooperWhat is the source for this?Jan 6, 2019, 9:43 AMChristian SeriousCongressmen should never be allowed dual citizenship
Ever!! Even citizens shouldn’t but I’d be willing to give a pass to legal residencesJan 6, 2019, 9:43 AMGlen DanielsNo one here controls who “the Jewish state” offers citizenship to. If ireland offered citizenship to all Irish descendants in Congress would that be in their control, imply Irish control over the official, or mean they were disqualified from office? Of course not.. because that’s ridiculous.Jan 6, 2019, 9:44 AMGlen DanielsI agree but they aren’t dual citizens. Israel has a right of return policy for Jewish descendants. I dont know that any of these people have actually ever applied for dual citizenship to israel. It’s misleading.Jan 6, 2019, 9:46 AMAndrea RoyallI believe the point of the post is 1-) the overrepresentation of Jews in political office versus their percentage in the general populace and 2-) no one should hold dual citizenship if they wish to be in political office.
And to address the Irish- 3-) Ireland isn’t trying to set the Middle East on fire in some ridiculous religious pursuitJan 6, 2019, 9:49 AMBartosz SzykYou mean dual citizenship but one loyalty.. not woke at all..Jan 6, 2019, 9:51 AMGlen DanielsAndrea Royall 1-has nothing to do with the post. 2- they don’t have it. They’d have to move to israel and apply. 3-again has nothing to do with with the post and more accurately describes arabs.Jan 6, 2019, 9:51 AMAndrea RoyallThey do not have to move to Israel to applyJan 6, 2019, 9:53 AMAndrea RoyallJan 6, 2019, 9:53 AMSteven KolpekColor-coded.Jan 6, 2019, 9:53 AMAndrea RoyallAnd I didn’t say 3 applied to the post.. it addresses your ridiculous addition of the Irish… you know… a straw manJan 6, 2019, 9:53 AMウォルフソン アダムHow does that effect your life in anyway if a passport comes with benefits then shouldn’t you worry about your own country’s benefits think about itJan 6, 2019, 9:54 AMGlen DanielsLooks like they do. Your pic only means it’s automatic on arrival and request. Jews in the US aren’t mailed Israeli citizenship cards. Jesus fucking christ…Jan 6, 2019, 9:55 AMSarunas NavickisDemocrats in lump majority.Jan 6, 2019, 9:56 AMGlen DanielsAndrea it’s not a straw man. It’s a substitute example to show hypocrisy.Jan 6, 2019, 9:57 AMԴավիդ ՎելլաI strongly suspect they wouldn’t have been loyal to Israel either had they only had the Israeli passport. Netanyahu’s faction don’t seem to like them at all.Jan 6, 2019, 9:58 AMGlen DanielsMany of these Democrats are the same people who favored Netanyahu’s oust and Obama’s “army of lawyers” who went over there to get him out of office.Jan 6, 2019, 9:59 AMAndrea RoyallI never said they were mailed cards……. Speaking of Jesus fucking Christ…. The facts are these…. You don’t like the post…. so.. if you are that obsessed with the “Jewish question” Glen.. Then I suggest you contact them all directly to answer your questions… Jews can claim right of return so long as they can prove that not only that they are Jews but are not a danger to the populace.Jan 6, 2019, 10:03 AMAndrea Royallウォルフソン アダム Troll….Jan 6, 2019, 10:03 AMBartosz SzykAnyone that holds more than one citizenship should be barred from any work in the Government.. If the American tax payer is paying your salary then you can only have one citizenship, and have had it for at least 6 years.. (;-) just kidding) At least 30 years I meant to say.. Especially when it pertains to holding public office.. Congressman, Senator, Judge, Police Officer, etc.. me thinks..Jan 6, 2019, 10:07 AMAndrea RoyallI already see how this post affects you.. I don’t have the time nor the patience to deal with a gay troll…Jan 6, 2019, 10:11 AMԴավիդ ՎելլաIt seems to me that they’re a mafia unto their own and should be seen as such. I strongly suspect that the hype about having X% “Jewish” DNA (there is no such thing) is just an attempt to curry favour with them and get accepted in the family.Jan 6, 2019, 10:11 AMAlex KnepperI cannot believe you think this is accurate. Low IQ alert????Jan 6, 2019, 10:16 AMウォルフソン アダムIt came up on new feed and thought who’s this bitch ass niggaJan 6, 2019, 10:18 AMウォルフソン アダムAlso you have evil eyes royall so does the kidJan 6, 2019, 10:19 AMAndrea RoyallAnd? You do understand there’s a schism in the Jewish community… most American Jews, despite wish for “right of return”, lean left politically.. and those that live, in actuality, in Israel are right leaning. Netanyahu is considered center-right… when you make your telephone calls to verify their dual citizenship… you can ask why they wanted Obama to interfere in a foreign election.Jan 6, 2019, 10:20 AMCaduceus MercuriusHere’s an older list (2007) with a short description of the individuals:
https://www.facebook.com/notes/we-are-all-vittorio-arrigoni/list-of-politicians-with-israeli-dual-citizenship-/175479365845092/Jan 6, 2019, 10:24 AMCaduceus MercuriusThis seems to be the source of the picture:
https://www.quora.com/Does-anyone-in-the-US-Senate-or-House-have-dual-citizenshipJan 6, 2019, 10:26 AMAndrea RoyallHow does someone that’s 99.9% Northern European become the n-word… precisely… and I can’t help you’re jealous of blonde haired blue eyed people. That’s your personal problem..Jan 6, 2019, 10:30 AMChristian SeriousBartosz Szyk I’m not sure
I think 10 years is a good bet
The constitution is pretty good about that in my eyes
But the kicker is that they 100% renounce their past citizenshipJan 6, 2019, 10:31 AMWayne WaltonWhat’s the sourceJan 6, 2019, 10:41 AMAndrzej SalekIt’s more of a singular loyalty no questionJan 6, 2019, 10:42 AMCurtus MaximusI sense a straw man. No one said anything about deliberate ploy for congressional influence, did they?Jan 6, 2019, 10:48 AMIgor WallaertOf all the places this was one of the last where I expected boomers to comment. Clearly you are clueless about the JQ.Jan 6, 2019, 10:54 AMIgor WallaertExactly. Jews only have one and only one loyalty.Jan 6, 2019, 10:56 AMCurt Doolittle(I post these things to create falsificationary arguments. I know how to teach men. You do not. ….. Now, the difference between automatically granted dual citizenship and individually pursued is what it is. That said, it’s rather obvious that the argument that jews are heavily influential in the underclass dysgenic movement in the west and anglo-germanics the aristocratic eugenic. Just as jews were instrumental in the communist movements around the world, just as jews were instrumental in bringing about the abrahamic dark ages by the same means. These statements aren’t deniable they’re empirical facts. Demonstrated preference = truth. Reported preference = deceit. NO MORE LIES )Jan 6, 2019, 11:01 AMAndrea RoyallCurtus.. no but I will.. I think there’s a deliberate ploy for influence.. in all higher spheres of influence.Jan 6, 2019, 11:05 AMCurtus MaximusAndrea Royall I would agree with you, lol. I’ve taken a look at these peoples pages. One has shared a screenshot of the definition of ad hominem like it’s something they’ve just now discovered? I don’t know, but funny how they attacked you for having evil eyes.Jan 6, 2019, 11:09 AMAndrea RoyallLOL… Envy wasn’t one of the 7 deadly sins for nothing 😉Jan 6, 2019, 11:11 AMCaduceus MercuriusThis seems to be the source (2017):
https://govbanknotes.wordpress.com/2017/06/07/us-senators-and-us-representatives-that-are-israel-dual-citizens/Jan 6, 2019, 11:18 AMArnold BrunsonWe all know they only have one loyalty. And it sure the hell isn’t the United States.Jan 6, 2019, 11:22 AMJames Dmitro MakienkoIsrael has a very lax immigration policy for Jews – according to 1970 amended version of Law of Return one can have one jewish grandparent to immigrate there. They are not using the matrilineal definition of Halacha law, that is why there are something like ~400K non-jewish immigrants to Israel living there now – with full Israeli citizenship. One ultra-orthodox rabbi even went as far as calling them “Amalekites” (a very very strong term, given that one of the 613 mitzvot is to final-solution all Amalekites)
So being Jewish automatically gives one a back-up first-world country to escape to if things get rough.Jan 6, 2019, 11:26 AMFawzi M. ChalaDrew KowalskiJan 6, 2019, 11:43 AMJaromír MiškovskýGuess who would want to kill only NatzBol state? :
https://apunked.wordpress.com/2017/04/25/north-korea-cheonan-false-flag/Jan 6, 2019, 12:53 PMMatt TomisinLow IQ? Look at your page Alex. Lol, i dont need to say more.Jan 6, 2019, 12:57 PMThomas Alt BeesleySteven Kolpek
Lieberman ought to be blue and yellow. He was a Democrat before he was Independent.Jan 6, 2019, 1:12 PMMichael SheppardIt’s not like they get kicked out of > 100 countries for no reasonJan 6, 2019, 1:24 PMSteven KolpekSanders went Dem after being Independent for a while, as well. I just colored them based on the source image itself for ease.Jan 6, 2019, 1:37 PMAlex Knepper”the difference between automatically granted dual citizenship and individually pursued is what it is.”
The difference between qualifying for something and pursuing it “is what it is”? Yeah, I’ll say. It’s the difference between the potential and the actual.
I’d explain to you why this is wrong, but you already know it is wrong, and you posted it anyway, because you don’t care. Let’s summarize what you have said: You have a right to lie on behalf of stopping the awful Jews. You consciously posted something you knew was false and justify it to me by saying that the urgency of the task of defeating the Jews demands that you must offer this pious fraud to the world, since, you know, small minds and their need for propaganda and all that. What’s more amazing is how your amen corner lapped this up.Jan 6, 2019, 1:44 PMKevin CoxYou must be tribe.Jan 6, 2019, 2:03 PMTyler DawnAlex you sound like a little bitch. Go home. Leave this stuff for men.Jan 6, 2019, 2:10 PMTyler DawnYoure a fucking meme. You should stop trying so hard to sound smart because it makes you look like more of a tool than you already are.Jan 6, 2019, 2:12 PMSteven JacksonI’d also add that as religion and culture are almost inseparable Islam is a proxy for a foreign state and practitioners of the religion are all essentially dual citizens.
If we’ve learned anything, freedom of religion is dangerous unless there is a higher philosophy unifying several sects.Jan 6, 2019, 2:18 PMRonald Scottfor zero loyalty!Jan 6, 2019, 2:30 PMAlex KnepperWatch the vermin scatter!Jan 6, 2019, 3:50 PMJesse Van SteelandtAlex knepper looked disgusting! White shirt with his nipples protruding, very, very disrespectful.Jan 6, 2019, 4:31 PMOscar Svanbergoy veyJan 6, 2019, 5:25 PMTyler SeguinFormer blogger at huffpost hahahaJan 6, 2019, 5:47 PMGlen DanielsAndrea Royall you’re not addressing the content of the post. I’m not arguing the JQ. I’m arguing that this post intentionally misleading. You keep bringing up other issues instead of addressing what’s presented.Jan 6, 2019, 5:49 PMAndrea RoyallI’m addressing what you said in this thread. That is it and that is all. You have already shown yourself to be presumptive and dishonest. And, I frankly have no time nor patience for that. So, stop tagging me and do what ever makes you feel good, because that’s exactly what you’re going to do.Jan 6, 2019, 5:52 PMGlen DanielsCurt Doolittle this post is intentionally misleading. LYING. It seems like you are excusing posting inaccurate content by claiming you were just stirring the pot of discussion to “teach men.” Dual loyalties are real. No argument there. But this is the second JQ issue that you posted about in which you took up an alt right argument and ran with it before checking into the backstory or context.Jan 6, 2019, 5:55 PMCurt DoolittleActually I post false memes all the time for this purpose. Search my feed. This meme makes the argument that these people have dual citizenship and dual interests. It does not show that they needed to take no ACTION to produce it.
The JQ is what it is.
Now, as I have advocated, just as a thought experiment, the royal houses could issue passports, and for example the british monarchy could grant right of return to those of us of english descent.
Now, at this point if that occurred, I would have a very hard time with those shared interests, because I have extraordinary loyalties to my people.
It would definitely alter my political interests if I was in the houses of government.
I expect that it alters theirs.Jan 6, 2019, 6:01 PMGlen DanielsAndrea Royall Lady, you brought up everything BUT the content of the original post. Maybe you’re a sycophant or don’t understand discussing what’s presented versus making opportunities to discuss other things. Either way everything you said here contributed nothing to the topic at hand.Jan 6, 2019, 6:03 PMGlen DanielsCurt Doolittle Doubt. They have no control over the actions and intentions of a foreign government. This is like saying Russia could influence trump by offering him citizenship. Total BS that trump would have nothing to do with.Jan 6, 2019, 6:06 PMCurt Doolittlenon argument. they oppose, and that is enoughJan 6, 2019, 6:17 PMSteven JacksonCurt Doolittle the dual loyalty of many US citizens in combination with Marxism led to many of Europe’s problems in the 20th century.
The IRA being the most prominent to my knowledge.
They used Marxist rhetoric to convince “Irish-Americans” to donate to terrorists and lobbied the US government to support their pet cause.
Every separatist or socialist movement in Europe had support from “Italian, Israeli, Hungarian – Americans”
I would even posit that the democrats held power for so long because it allowed the various foreign interest groups to fund their pet projects in the “home countries”
The tentacles of dual citizenship spread far and wide wreak havoc wherever they touch.Jan 6, 2019, 6:27 PMTyler LewisDamn Alex you’ve gotten really fat since trump winning the election lolJan 6, 2019, 6:28 PMAndrew ClaytonI wonder what the ratio of Israeli dual-citizenship there is vs other countries. This seems like a lot!Jan 6, 2019, 7:04 PMAndrew ClaytonComing from a Huffpo blogger lol
You sure you don’t have a dog in this fight?Jan 6, 2019, 7:08 PMSean Emmbibi said he wants to the world blueJan 6, 2019, 7:10 PMGreg WoodburyUS will be a colony againJan 6, 2019, 7:22 PMAlex KnepperKeep the ad hominems coming lol!Jan 6, 2019, 10:00 PMJesse Van SteelandtJan 6, 2019, 10:01 PMAlex KnepperI mean, people obviously care or else this sub-thread wouldn’t feature half a dozen people attacking me for anything but the points I madeJan 6, 2019, 10:02 PMJesse Van SteelandtNaw bro, you just effeminate and like any species in nature the masculine love to subdue the effeminate. It’s like playing a sport really.Jan 6, 2019, 10:03 PMAlex KnepperYes, Curt Doolittle is really the paragon of masculinity 🙄Jan 6, 2019, 10:04 PMJesse Van SteelandtDude is autistic bro, that’s as masculine brained as you can get.Jan 6, 2019, 10:05 PMJesse Van SteelandtAnd you didn’t say curt Doolittle, you said a dozen people on this thread. Dum dum.Jan 6, 2019, 10:05 PMGlen DanielsHuffpo is cancer tho.. no lieJan 6, 2019, 10:06 PMAlex KnepperHas anyone else noted the irony in literally autistic people speaking about the need to root out so-called dysgenic movements?Jan 6, 2019, 10:06 PMAlex KnepperI haven’t written for HuffPo in almost six yearsJan 6, 2019, 10:07 PMJesse Van SteelandtAutism is peak performance.Jan 6, 2019, 10:07 PMJesse Van SteelandtEspecially the very rare and powerful kinds.Jan 6, 2019, 10:07 PMDustin HutchinsonI don’t believe they have dual loyalty.
They exploit 🇺🇸 for 🇮🇱.Jan 7, 2019, 2:21 AMJames SantagataBy definition of Israel’s Right of Return, they are all dual nationals / dual citizens. Even Sam Sheinbein was. He murdered Americans boys, then fled to Israel, and although not an Israeli was given cash and instant citizenship. Right of Return for Jews is allowed for atheists and identity as well as the observants as long as the person is not a Christian (see the Brother Daniel case).Jan 7, 2019, 5:01 AMJosé Francisco MayoraJesse Van Steelandt nice tits 😏👌👌👌Jan 7, 2019, 6:33 AMJosé Francisco MayoraJan 7, 2019, 6:41 AMJosé Francisco MayoraSteven Jackson Teddy Roosevelt was right.Jan 7, 2019, 6:43 AMJosé Francisco MayoraHyphenated Americans aren’t Americans at all.Jan 7, 2019, 6:44 AMSteven JacksonJosé Francisco Mayora WRT non interference in Europe?Jan 7, 2019, 7:01 AMJosé Francisco MayoraSteven Jackson …It would’ve helped a lot if America would have bring a little help here in Spain after Civil War, by contrast it was very harmful due to the Hispanic-American War and the loses of Cuba, Puerto Rico and the Philippines. But the point of this tread is an American exclusively domestic affair, so in that very sense Teddy was right. There’s no such a thing as dual citizenship in a national state. Not in America nor in Europe.Jan 7, 2019, 7:16 AMSteven JacksonJosé Francisco Mayora did any aid come from the US during the Spanish civil war?
Were there any of Spanish descent collecting money for the effort on either side?Jan 7, 2019, 7:18 AMJosé Francisco MayoraAmerican communists (they were a lot in the 30’s) helped the República (USSR backed) with economic resources and even conscripts. They helped the wrong side, but it wasn’t an official aid at all.Jan 7, 2019, 7:31 AMSteven JacksonJosé Francisco Mayora yep, the headquarters of Communism was never in Moscow but New York.
Same thing with the IRA in IrelandJan 7, 2019, 7:34 AMJosé Francisco MayoraExactly. As it is NOWADAYS.Jan 7, 2019, 7:35 AMSteven JacksonJosé Francisco Mayora the worst bit is, every “anti fascist partisan” the west funded during WWII was actually a communist terroristJan 7, 2019, 7:42 AMJosé Francisco MayoraFrom the Baltic states, through Poland, Ukraine, former Yugoslavia and all the Warsaw pact. Spain was saved from Communism thanks to Generalísimo Francisco Franco (Q. D. D. G) but it costs three years of war, over one million deaths, and a fracture in national union than reaches until today, with Basque and Catalonian separatism.Jan 7, 2019, 7:49 AMMatthew Timbrookhttps://www.timesofisrael.com/congress-is-now-three-times-as-jewish-as-the-us-is/Jan 7, 2019, 11:57 AMDavid McCarthyIn their own words “there is no dual loyalty” therefor they’re only loyal to one country, and it isn’t this one.Jan 9, 2019, 11:09 PMDUAL CITIZENSHIP FOR DUAL LOYALTY
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/49346210_10156895518072264_3796733798125666304_n_10156895518062264.jpg THE ECONOMICS OF HEADS.
OK. Let’s pretend this is a serious question rather than “Maybe I can get Doolittle to laugh.”
Heads are heavy and expensive. (About ten pounds).
Scalps are light and expensive, but easy to fake.
Shrunken heads are costly to produce.
Skull pyramids are costly to produce.
Therefore shrunken heads make an exceptional substitute for a ‘gold standard’. So, buy-in for the franchise, (the number of shares you acquire) can best be paid in shrunken heads.
The skull pyramids are just status symbols that demonstrate one’s contribution to the common good.
QUIZ
For an extra ten points please explain how Inflation can be affected by shrunken-head backed currency, and how inflation can be limited.
Thanks. (lolz)Curt DoolittleThe crazy sh-t people PM is far crazier than the crazy sh-t they comment or post… lolJan 4, 2019, 7:51 PMStephen ThomasI like this economyJan 4, 2019, 7:52 PMDaniel EssShrunken head supply will increase as good times are created by hard men. Good times will inevitably produce soft men, allowing evil men to proliferate and more heads to become available. Infinite good times or unstopable inflation?Jan 4, 2019, 7:54 PMGeorg Ioslol. Post more screenshots of them!!Jan 4, 2019, 7:55 PMCurt DoolittleYou just described the business cycle I think… lolzJan 4, 2019, 7:55 PMCurt Doolittleit only encourages people… lolJan 4, 2019, 7:57 PMDustin HutchinsonInflation – mass “collection” of all types
Limitation – “collection” of specific typesJan 4, 2019, 7:58 PMCurt DoolittleSo you’re recommending multiple classes of stock? lol Interesting concept.Jan 4, 2019, 7:58 PMStephen ThomasGo on…Jan 4, 2019, 7:58 PMDustin HutchinsonRarity + disdain = higher value
Commonality + apathy = low valueJan 4, 2019, 8:08 PMJames SantagataHow are inventories accounts for? LIFO or FIFO? And for a skull business, what is the “break even point”?Jan 4, 2019, 9:05 PMDustin HutchinsonAbout 6 million…Jan 4, 2019, 9:14 PMSean Emmi’ve known many people with inflated headsJan 4, 2019, 9:15 PMCurt Doolittleyes, but how do you SHRINK them?Jan 4, 2019, 9:17 PMSean Emmi like to use lye to reduce things to their constituent components, extract, sort and fileJan 4, 2019, 9:18 PMEli HarmanThe historical method of cleaning bones was boiling. I hear taxidermists use peroxide for superior aesthetics, in 20-40% concentrations.
As far as the shrunken heads, the first step in head shrinking is generally skull removal.
So shrunken heads and skull pyramids are not mutually exclusive!Jan 5, 2019, 2:27 AMArno KælandSerious question: what length and strength is optimal for a Vlad Tepes stake?Jan 7, 2019, 5:41 AMCurt DoolittleThree feet in the ground, three feet of clearance, plus the height of the individual. So minimum twelve, preferable fifteen feet. (4.5-5.5 Meters)
Also depends upon whether it’s by anal insertion (torture) or abdominal insertion (display). lolJan 7, 2019, 8:35 AMSteven JacksonAnal torture prevents the spread of disease by locking in the feces, waste fluids run down the stake and don’t drip on those walking underneath.
Abdominal insertion allows for fluids to drip off toes and fingers potentially ruining the experience for visitors and observers.
Also, the screams ensuing from anal insertion reduce the budget for production, the tortured are loud enough acoustically, we just need to light themJan 7, 2019, 8:51 AMDarren HowellDiameter of said stake??? This is gunna tickle…🤔🤔😳😳😳Jan 8, 2019, 5:09 PMTHE ECONOMICS OF HEADS.
OK. Let’s pretend this is a serious question rather than “Maybe I can get Doolittle to laugh.”
Heads are heavy and expensive. (About ten pounds).
Scalps are light and expensive, but easy to fake.
Shrunken heads are costly to produce.
Skull pyramids are costly to produce.
Therefore shrunken heads make an exceptional substitute for a ‘gold standard’. So, buy-in for the franchise, (the number of shares you acquire) can best be paid in shrunken heads.
The skull pyramids are just status symbols that demonstrate one’s contribution to the common good.
QUIZ
For an extra ten points please explain how Inflation can be affected by shrunken-head backed currency, and how inflation can be limited.
Look. I don’t make mistakes.
It’s my job to prosecute pseudoscience. Race denialism, is pseudoscience just, just as much as marxist economics is pseudoscience, as much as theology is pseudoscience, and just as much as postmodernism is a combination of sophism, pseudoscience, and outright denial .
The importance of race may be relative but the existence of races is an observable fact which is fairly obvious from the vast differences in our skulls that equal to the differences in the identification of everything from beetles to mammals.
Ergo if you say certain species and subspecies should be protected and do not say that the same applies to humans then you are simply engaging in fraud and deceit.
Here is a link to the full extent of known peoples, which I update to reflect each major revision in the DNA research once or twice a year. I have not updated it for 2018 findings yet.
Below is the Primate taxonomy. Taxonomy is determined by morphology (gene expression) assisting in the identification of kin groups (kin selection). In other words, morphology assists in the identification of kin, and because of kin better ability to judge the fitness of those mates. (Conversely, crossing kingroup boundaries provides the genetically UNFIT with opportunity that is not available within group. As such superior groups should logically seek to exit non-conforming members, not retain them.)
The difference between races are observable at the morphological, behavioral, aggregate behavioral, and genetic levels, but largely minor other than the fact that the size of the underclass genetic classes versus the middle genetic classes is asymmetric favoring survival under glaciation, as well as survival of winter farming, which led to greater neoteny (‘domestication’) in the far east and far west and less so in the more equatorial regions.
When we notice differences between the races we are largely noticing (and reacting to) greater and lesser degrees of neotonic evolution, and when we stereotype races we are largely noticing and reacting to the sizes of the underclasses in relation tot he middle and upper.
And when we measure the economic, political, social, and intellectual status of civilizations, races, and subraces, we are largely measuring the inability of groups to cull the size of the underclass sufficiently to produce a Pareto distribution capable of economic, political, social, and military competition with neighboring groups.
This is the science. And any contrary argument is false, lie, and fraud. Sorry.
Order:Primates
Suborder:Haplorhini
Infraorder:Simiiformes
Family:Hominidae
Subfamily:Homininae
Tribe: Hominini
… Genus: Pan
… … Species
… … … Pan Troglodytes ( Common Chimpanzee)
… … … Subspecies:
… … … … 1. Pan troglodytes verus
… … … … 2. P. t. ellioti
… … … … 3. P. t. troglodytes
… … … … 4. P. t. schweinfurthii
… … Species
… … … Pan Paniscus (Bonobo)
… Genus:Homo
… … Species:
… … … H. sapiens (anatomically modern humans)
… … … Subspecies:
… … … … H. S. Sapiens
… … … … … Races:
… … … … … … H. S. Africanus
… … … … … … H. S. Mongoloid
… … … … … … H. S. Caucasoid
The question is only whether we are different races, subspecies, or species, since the definition of subspecies on down is determined by adaptation to geographic conditions and tendency for ingroup selection.
Since humans are happy to attempt to ‘breed with’ (euphemistically) just about anything from dogs, to sheep to donkeys, the we have only marriage selection as an equivalent test of ingroup identification among human races.
Cheers
Look. I don’t make mistakes.
It’s my job to prosecute pseudoscience. Race denialism, is pseudoscience just, just as much as marxist economics is pseudoscience, as much as theology is pseudoscience, and just as much as postmodernism is a combination of sophism, pseudoscience, and outright denial .
The importance of race may be relative but the existence of races is an observable fact which is fairly obvious from the vast differences in our skulls that equal to the differences in the identification of everything from beetles to mammals.
Ergo if you say certain species and subspecies should be protected and do not say that the same applies to humans then you are simply engaging in fraud and deceit.
Here is a link to the full extent of known peoples, which I update to reflect each major revision in the DNA research once or twice a year. I have not updated it for 2018 findings yet.
Below is the Primate taxonomy. Taxonomy is determined by morphology (gene expression) assisting in the identification of kin groups (kin selection). In other words, morphology assists in the identification of kin, and because of kin better ability to judge the fitness of those mates. (Conversely, crossing kingroup boundaries provides the genetically UNFIT with opportunity that is not available within group. As such superior groups should logically seek to exit non-conforming members, not retain them.)
The difference between races are observable at the morphological, behavioral, aggregate behavioral, and genetic levels, but largely minor other than the fact that the size of the underclass genetic classes versus the middle genetic classes is asymmetric favoring survival under glaciation, as well as survival of winter farming, which led to greater neoteny (‘domestication’) in the far east and far west and less so in the more equatorial regions.
When we notice differences between the races we are largely noticing (and reacting to) greater and lesser degrees of neotonic evolution, and when we stereotype races we are largely noticing and reacting to the sizes of the underclasses in relation tot he middle and upper.
And when we measure the economic, political, social, and intellectual status of civilizations, races, and subraces, we are largely measuring the inability of groups to cull the size of the underclass sufficiently to produce a Pareto distribution capable of economic, political, social, and military competition with neighboring groups.
This is the science. And any contrary argument is false, lie, and fraud. Sorry.
Order:Primates
Suborder:Haplorhini
Infraorder:Simiiformes
Family:Hominidae
Subfamily:Homininae
Tribe: Hominini
… Genus: Pan
… … Species
… … … Pan Troglodytes ( Common Chimpanzee)
… … … Subspecies:
… … … … 1. Pan troglodytes verus
… … … … 2. P. t. ellioti
… … … … 3. P. t. troglodytes
… … … … 4. P. t. schweinfurthii
… … Species
… … … Pan Paniscus (Bonobo)
… Genus:Homo
… … Species:
… … … H. sapiens (anatomically modern humans)
… … … Subspecies:
… … … … H. S. Sapiens
… … … … … Races:
… … … … … … H. S. Africanus
… … … … … … H. S. Mongoloid
… … … … … … H. S. Caucasoid
The question is only whether we are different races, subspecies, or species, since the definition of subspecies on down is determined by adaptation to geographic conditions and tendency for ingroup selection.
Since humans are happy to attempt to ‘breed with’ (euphemistically) just about anything from dogs, to sheep to donkeys, the we have only marriage selection as an equivalent test of ingroup identification among human races.
Cheers
(Rule of Threes…three weeks without power, three months without order…)
—“an Iranian military journal has floated around the idea of launching an EMP attack as the key to defeating the U.S. In an article titled “Electronics to Determine Fate of Future Wars,” the journal explains how an EMP attack on America’s electronic infrastructure would bring the country to its knees.
“Once you confuse the enemy communication network, you can also disrupt the work of the enemy command- and decision-making center,” the article states. “Even worse today when you disable a country’s military high command through disruption of communications, you will, in effect, disrupt all the affairs of that country. If the world’s industrial countries fail to devise effective ways to defend themselves against dangerous electronic assaults, then they will disintegrate within a few years. American soldiers would not be able to find food to eat nor would they be able to fire a single shot.”
Reporting to Congress, the EMP Commission concluded that little in the private sector is hardened to withstand an EMP attack, and even the U.S. military itself has only limited protection. In 2005, Former CIA chief James Woolsey affirmed these facts and urged the country to take steps necessary to protect against the potentially devastating consequences. In testimony before the House International Terrorism and Non-Proliferation Subcommittee, Woolsey referred to the nuclear EMP threat as “a SCUD in a bucket” whereby:
“…a simple ballistic missile from a stockpile somewhere in the world outfitted on something like a tramp steamer and fired from some distance offshore into an American city or to a high altitude, thereby creating an electromagnetic pulse effect, which could well be one of the most damaging ways of using a nuclear weapon.”
“…We do not have the luxury of assuming that Iran, if it develops fissionable materials, for example, would not share it under some circumstances with al-Qaida operatives. We don’t have the luxury of believing that just because North Korea is a communist state, it would not work under some circumstances to sell its fissionable material to Hezbollah or al-Qaida.”—
(humans are endlessly interesting)Matt EvansAlways relevant: http://anthropology.msu.edu/anp202-us13/files/2012/05/Sauer-1992-Forensic-Anthropology-Race-Concept-1.pdfJan 4, 2019, 2:13 PMJanderson RexWhat an interesting paper. I wonder if the author actually believes race doesn’t exist or was merely being PC.
He doth protest a bit muchJan 4, 2019, 2:25 PMMatt EvansJanderson Rex the paper’s conclusion is hilariousJan 4, 2019, 2:32 PMSean Emm>there is no such thing as race
>who cares what skin color someone has
>there is only one race; the human race
you wouldn’t be able to tell race, gender, age, quality of life, brain size etc simply from a skull if it was a construct and only skin deepJan 4, 2019, 2:32 PMSteve PenderI made this graphic 14 years agoJan 4, 2019, 2:40 PMLiupold EngelwulfCurt I wonder if our skulls look the sameJan 4, 2019, 2:42 PMFreyr BjörnssonQuite amazing doublethink going on in this paperJan 4, 2019, 2:51 PMThomas Alt BeesleyThat caucasoid skull does seem to have an abnormal forehead from other examples I’ve seen.
*EDITTED for auto correct error*Jan 4, 2019, 2:51 PMCurt Doolittlei dunno but the only way we can tell is MRI, Xray or if our enemies decide they want to use us them for decoration.Jan 4, 2019, 2:51 PMCurt DoolittleProfiles are easier to compare.Jan 4, 2019, 2:52 PMThomas Alt BeesleyI just realized that my phone autocorrected “abnormal” to “a normal”
But yes, I agree with your statement regardless.Jan 4, 2019, 2:53 PMCurt Doolittleyes that caucasian skull has a larger lower jaw, and more overbite than usual.Jan 4, 2019, 2:54 PMCurt Doolittlejust covering his assJan 4, 2019, 2:55 PMRichard AllenJan 4, 2019, 3:14 PMRichard HallRichard Allen Race is only skin deep. 🤥Jan 4, 2019, 3:18 PMLisa OuthwaiteWhat are your thoughts on the elongated skulls found in South America and across Europe?Jan 4, 2019, 3:25 PMIan MalmströmAnd we see more similarities between asian and european skulls than between these and the african.
The denisovan/neanderthal link is prominent both when it comes to skulls and gwnetic markers (it’s no coincidence that asians and europeans have better analytic skills, and that neanderthals also have unique genes linked with analytic intelligence)Jan 4, 2019, 3:35 PMLiupold EngelwulfI’m a race realist but I’m wondering how much skulls vary among europeans. Using 1 skull from each race isn’t really doing it for me.Jan 4, 2019, 4:06 PMKari Anne DorstadI’m guess I’m a negroid ? Based on the size of head ?Jan 4, 2019, 4:11 PMCurt DoolittleNeoteny shortens the ‘snout’.Jan 4, 2019, 4:12 PMClaire Rae RandallYeah, but we’re ‘All One’, right?Jan 4, 2019, 4:13 PMKari Anne DorstadLisa Outhwaite good question!!Jan 4, 2019, 4:16 PMScott RhodesWhen I went to University, those were the only 3 acknowledged races, with the possible addition of Australian Aborigine.Jan 4, 2019, 4:30 PMSean Emmhow is this hard for race deniers to understand? you can see the human that would be skinned over these skulls quite easilyJan 4, 2019, 4:31 PMSean EmmJan 4, 2019, 4:33 PMGöran DahlTechnically, your university is right. When you look at a PCA-plot, you only see three large macroclusters, namely Sub-Saharan African, East Eurasian and West Eurasian; and then there are outliers and mixed ethnicities in-between them.Jan 4, 2019, 4:33 PMScott RhodesGöran Dahl I was satisfied with the nomenclature then and still am today, as you have underscored. Today, laypeople and even many who should know better, label religious groups and the like as “races”.Jan 4, 2019, 4:48 PMThomas Alt BeesleyWell, that and the forehead is malformed. It’s domed in the middle. Typically it’s flatter.Jan 4, 2019, 5:13 PMThomas Alt BeesleyLike this.Jan 4, 2019, 5:13 PMRichard HallMatt Evans Yea part of the abstract hints at race being a social construct:
“It is maintained in this paper that the successful
assignment of race to a skeletal specimen is not a vindication of the race concept, but rather a prediction
that an individual, while alive was assigned to a particular socially constructed ‘racial’ category. A
specimen may display features that point to African ancestry. In this country that person is likely to have
been labeled Black regardless of whether or not such a race actually exists in nature.”
An odd and needless knot to the himself in to.Jan 4, 2019, 6:20 PMRichard HallLiupold Engelwulf I’m sure this has been done with skulls that represent statistical averages.Jan 4, 2019, 6:22 PMChristian GrønningJan 4, 2019, 6:52 PMGreg Hamiltonthe fact that unless people are mixed they can be 100% sorted visually of course means nothing…
The fact they can be sorted visually just by bones. Means nothing…
The fact they can be DNA sorted means nothing…
Somehow race doesn’t exist ..Jan 4, 2019, 8:55 PMDustin HutchinsonLook at the highly developed prefrontal cortex on that beautiful caucasoid skull…
I wonder if that has any special significance?Jan 4, 2019, 8:59 PMThomas Alt Beesleyhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AqqdkKwbyG4Jan 4, 2019, 9:07 PMShawn David GevedonAccording J Phillip Rushton the White average brain size is about 1347cc’s and the Black average brain size is 1267cc’s. In contrast, the largest brain size recorded for an individual ape is 700cc’s. Scientists for a long, long time have known blacks have smaller brain size on average. If you can find a 1959 enclyclopedia Britannica the section on races will mention Whites have a larger brain size on average. The juice and liberals have had this racial information scrubbed from most books published after 1959. These are African Amercan stats the Sub Saharan black brain even smaller and IQ around 75. Dumb people will say blacks can be doctors, lawyers etc. that just repetition, practice anyone can do that but creativity is where smartness counts. The African hasn’t created nothing, couldn’t even grab concept of the wheel, domesticate animals, written language and so on. It’s sad that we cant discuss the truth that word racist is so important. I judge anyone by character I growed up in the hood, went to majority black schools.Jan 4, 2019, 9:07 PMThomas Alt BeesleyLooks like McNabb’s head tbh.Jan 4, 2019, 9:08 PMShawn David GevedonFront of brain is where the creativity lies.Jan 4, 2019, 9:27 PMAndrea RoyallThomas- I don’t know how old the skull is in the first profile.. but you can get “doming” with cranial malformation/ attempted correction during infancy.Jan 4, 2019, 11:44 PMThomas Alt BeesleyIt’s definitely interesting. I wonder what caused it.Jan 4, 2019, 11:47 PMAndrea RoyallWhat I see in modern infants is… they’re either premie, or sick and they’ve laid too long on one side and it’s created angles in the skull. These children go to a cranio-plastics physician and are measured and fitted for helmets that place pressure on certain points on the skull to decrease the angles. That can create a slight “dome” in the forehead. The helmets have a much higher efficiency if the Fontanelle hasn’t closed.Jan 4, 2019, 11:51 PMAndrea RoyallThat’s why I’d be interested to know how old that skull is…Jan 4, 2019, 11:51 PMCody McDonaldAsians and Caucasians are human the rest are notJan 5, 2019, 12:26 AMOdin WachtendorfTo be fair though, all hominids are a human.
One might be able to argue that Euro’s and Asians are if the same Sub-Species, where as Africans are not.Jan 5, 2019, 1:26 AMCody McDonaldAfricans are workers created by the space Jews (annunahki) to farm goldJan 5, 2019, 1:30 AMGöran DahlIt was a religious practice. The opposite was found in Proto-Indo-Europeans, more specifically Bell Beakers, who practiced intense board-swaddling on their babies to flatten their occipital bones, making them hyperbrachycephalic; a phenomenon still seen in East Asia and Southern Siberia, the latter being the place of origin for the paternal line of PIE people.Jan 5, 2019, 5:35 AMLisa OuthwaiteGöran Dahl Some of them fall into that category but head-boarding doesn’t increase the cranial volume. Some were legitimately elongated and larger. It explains why some societies practice such a bizarre custom – in order to mimic a previous elite class.Jan 5, 2019, 6:07 AMSimon StrömIan Malmström get varg out of your head. Modern Eurasians are closely related in a global context on account of having separated from Africans before splitting up while colonizing the world. Minuscule Neanderthal/Denisovan admixture are artifacts of having displaced other hominids during said colonization.Jan 5, 2019, 6:24 AMMartin ŠtěpánSimon Ström Didn’t Asians and Indo-Europeans leave it separately, making both of our closest relatives Africans and the similarities between us a case of convergent evolution?Jan 5, 2019, 6:59 AMMartin ŠtěpánAustralian is often unmentioned because they’re ultimately insignificant, as are dravidians. I also used to believe in Amerindian bring a separate race, altough I’m not sure where I got it from.Jan 5, 2019, 7:01 AMMartin ŠtěpánAgain, isn’t the divergence of Asians from Africans a seperate event to the seperating of Indo-Europeans from Africans?Jan 5, 2019, 7:03 AMCody McDonaldPeople may have went to Central Asia first and branched from there , also Asians have some other homonid mixed in with them like Europeans n whites have neanderthal mixed inJan 5, 2019, 7:26 AMAbhimanyu KarnawatRetards everywhere,do you understand the ecological fallacy?Jan 5, 2019, 8:13 AMAbhimanyu KarnawatDo you understand the bell curve?Jan 5, 2019, 10:13 AMSimon StrömNo. West (Caucasoid) and East (Mongoloid) Eurasians are more similar to each other than to Africans in terms of raw quantitative genetics, meaning shared drift and common descent, and not just by phys anthro metrics which may or may not be a result of convergent evolution.
Indo-European is an ethnolinguistic term which should not be used as a synonym for West Eurasians.
It should be stated however that all West Eurasians have varying degrees of ancestry from the “basal eurasians” who separated from the main Eurasian branch of anatomically modern humans, before the latter split into what would constitute the bulk of ancestries of West and East Eurasians, respectively.Jan 5, 2019, 5:54 PMAaron MilewskiOne more for the pile. 👌Jan 5, 2019, 7:21 PMLee TuckerGöran Dahl I thought Malay rated a separate categoryJan 6, 2019, 12:08 AMGöran DahlVery odd thing to say when they look like your average run-of-the-mill Southeast Asians, like Thais and Vietnamese. Perhaps you meant Papua New Guineans or something.Jan 6, 2019, 3:39 AMChris Bakerhttps://theracecardproject.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Skeleton-B05.jpg
But but but! The NPC’S say we’re all the same on the inside!!!! 👀👀😂Jan 7, 2019, 6:33 PMFASCINATING MORPHOLOGY: SKULL DIFFERENCES
PUTTING YOUR TRUST IN ONE GOVERNMENT ORDER OR ANOTHER?
You have to choose whether to trust the self interest of the judicial ‘priesthood’, the self interest of the monarchy, the self interest of the ruling oligarchy, or the self control of the democratic polity, or the self interests of public intellectuals.
My argument is that you can’t trust any of them, and that the judicial priesthood benefits from ‘maintaining the rules of the game’, but if and only if the military will back them up.
Why? The judiciary is a purely via-negativa discipline: it advocates nothing, and only resolves conflicts. It is already privileged. It is already high status. It is operationally selective (failure is quickly obvious and resolved), and failure of members is against the interest of the whole, who police it well through hierarchical review.
The central issue in limiting the judiciary and preserving its freedom from via-positiva action, is nothing more than insufficiently enumerated terms of decidability.
And that’s what i’ve done. Provided that completeness.
Well, lets get across the principle reason we need the university format.
(a) To provide you and others confidence in your investment of time and effort.
(b) To provide social, physical (fitness, fighting, war) and strategy (how to conduct war), the natural law and government under the natural law – the most ‘complete’ western aristocratic education that you can recieve.
(c) Our methodology requires a rather great deal of general knowledge that you have been denied in order to suppress the continuation of western civilization.
(d) To provide consistent training so that you all ‘sound the same’, and therefor preserve the brand value (persuasive value) of the methodology.
(e) To provide the full set of courses necessary for a judicial priesthood in the natural law, to transform our civilization just as thoroughly as did the M-P-F’s.
(f) To weaken any possible criticism.
In other words, this is going to be, as is in all my work, serious.
The courses will work just like college/university:
1 – Lecture (video),
2 – Assignment (usually short essay questions), and;
3 – Online discussions (in other words, a lot of help is available, because that’s part of ‘our thing’ is teaching one another.)
You will be able to just engage in online conversation, to join social events and activities, to take individual courses, or to take a certification in a series of courses, or to get a degree.
These courses will be (I promise) as good or better than those you would receive in the top ten universities. If you want to study law, it’s yale and harvard, if you want tech and science it’s MIT and Stanford. But if you survey the courses at these universities and compare them to ours, you will find that we are teaching far more substantial content than those others do, even at that level of university.
Part of the Accreditation process[1] requires those who teach warranty the students achievement. So this requires high investment of my time. So the first generation or two will get access to me. Afterward I do not know since I expect to do a lot of work generating the course material. I assume (hope) others will move in to teach the course. I know others who could do so already.
The workload will be the same as university, which is two hours of work to every one hour of course time. This is extremely hard for me to judge and we will have to tailor it going forward. Mostly I see short readings with some writing.
Some classes are 6 credits (two semesters of work) and some are 3 (one semester’s worth of work), and I have added some 1 credit courses as well. We are not bound by time constraints as much as universities so I will accelerate or slow the courses on demand
So, this is not one of those multiple choice things (gut courses). We want our education to be meaningful androck solid and doing it online this way produces extraordinarily good data for the accreditation process.
I think grades are going to be ‘incomplete’, ‘complete’, ‘distinction’, ‘honors’.
I am trying to figure out how to prevent people from overreaching their abilities, so that we don’t have a high drop out rate, or make people unhappy and critical. And so we are going to have an ‘application’ process that does some limited filtering for some of the classes, while say, the combat and weapons classes we just want to know if you’re mentally stable. lol.
Oh, and until we have accreditation (which takes years) we will charge the minimum possible for each course that we can.
-Curt
—
[1] regarding accreditation: In the USA anyone can start a college or university, offer training, credits, and certification. It is up to the market to determine whether those certifications have any value. The purpose of Accreditation for the student is to understand the value of those certifications, credits, and degrees in the market. The purpose of Accreditation for the organization, is the access to student loans it provides. Access to student loans will allow us to scale quickly.
—“Curt, is your field (philosophy) art or science?”— Francesco Principi
As I understand my work, given that science is an extension of the law, these are the three options:
1) Law, Sciences(Logics/Mathematics), Measurements. -vs- reality, competition, and testimony w/ warranty THE TRUE (EXISTENTIAL/REAL) – I consider this a ‘a science’.
-vs-
2) Philosophy, Literature, History, -vs- sophism, justification, and deceit w/o warranty THE IDEAL – I consider this an ‘art’.
-vs-
3) Theology, Scripture, Mythology -vs- supernaturalism, authoritarianism, and deceit w/o warranty THE FANTASY(IMAGINARY) – i consider this a ‘fraud or deceit’
In other words, I am not sure that the old versions of these terms have any meaning. I consider philosophy that which is yet unsolved in the narrow sense, OR the imagination of possible worlds (fantasy literature) in the broader sense.
So in the narrow sense I see philosophy closed (completed), and what was philosophy of ‘the big questions’ are solved. In the broad sense of imagining and reconstructing relations that we might prefer or that might be good, there will never be an end to that category of philosophizing.
As far as I know theorizing about the true and possible has replaced philosophizing, and theorizing completely under testimonialism has replaced the limited theorizing of the 19th and 20th century sciences.
So I tend to say I am a philosopher of natural law because it is all people can understand in the historical context of the available term.
But, technically speaking, what I understand that I am doing is the science of the law. Which in itself I think is what natural law must eventually mean. Where natural law and the laws of nature are separated only by conscious choice.
And so I don’t see any difference between science and law other than warranty. And as we have seen, science without warranty of due diligence is largely pseudoscience. and pseudoscience is just another term for fraud.
So as I understand it, truth = law, and all else are sub-grammars of that law if that is all that is required to solve that problem, or deciets that violate that law.
1) The Physical Laws (invariability),
2) the Natural Law (decidability),
3) History, and Literature (meaning), …
… are the only non-false domains and methods of inquiry remaining.
Drug addicts defend their habits. There are many ways of drugging the mind. Lies are the most common of them.
And stoicism, family, oath-feast-festival, and our nation of all those that came before, all those that are, and all those that are yet to be, are the cure for that addiction.
