(FB 1552425214 Timestamp) Teaching people GRAMMAR so that they can DECODE speech is not the same as teaching people to speak exclusively in decoded speech. We have been teaching people grammar, logic, rhetoric, arithmetic, geometry, music, and astronomy since the medieval era. Written speech is more rigorous than spoken. contract language more rigorous than written. P-speech more rigorous than contract. And the purpose of this speech is to construct law that is not open to ‘interpretation’ and therefore closed to ‘legislation from the bench’. —“In my experience one only need set about resolving oneself to use honest and clear wording to express one’s points/stance while being as factually based as possible. “— And so what’s the difference other than a formal method for doing so that also defends against error, and bias? And how would I hold you accountable for speaking honestly without some method for testing your speech – rather than just depend on your OPINION as to whether you speak honestly. What you MEAN is that you don’t want to be forced to learn how to do such a thing. And you don’t want such a thing embodied in law, because you don’t want to be accountable for your words. Right?
Form: Mini Essay
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1552425214 Timestamp) Teaching people GRAMMAR so that they can DECODE speech is not the same as teaching people to speak exclusively in decoded speech. We have been teaching people grammar, logic, rhetoric, arithmetic, geometry, music, and astronomy since the medieval era. Written speech is more rigorous than spoken. contract language more rigorous than written. P-speech more rigorous than contract. And the purpose of this speech is to construct law that is not open to ‘interpretation’ and therefore closed to ‘legislation from the bench’. —“In my experience one only need set about resolving oneself to use honest and clear wording to express one’s points/stance while being as factually based as possible. “— And so what’s the difference other than a formal method for doing so that also defends against error, and bias? And how would I hold you accountable for speaking honestly without some method for testing your speech – rather than just depend on your OPINION as to whether you speak honestly. What you MEAN is that you don’t want to be forced to learn how to do such a thing. And you don’t want such a thing embodied in law, because you don’t want to be accountable for your words. Right?
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1552596289 Timestamp) GET OVER THE NAP. IT MEANS YOU’RE A USEFUL IDIOT No. NAP looks like another semitic (abrahamic, marxist, libertarian, postmodern) pretense to reciprocity and rule of law, that (a) does not require reciprocity be earned, (b) retains the semitic means of deceit by fraud by omission enabling blackmail, enabling conspiracy, (c) (d) continuing the semitic method of baiting well meaning fools into hazard thru piplup and deceit. NAP is to Reciprocity as Labor Theory of Value is to Subjective Value, and as money proper is to money substitutes – it’s another fraud. Other things may look like reciprocity. But they are not. They are all substitutes for reciprocity because they are means of circumventing reciprocity. So since they are all worse than reciprocity, one must answer the question why one seeks something less than reciprocity, and as such why one seeks to preserve means of irreciprocity. I mean, we know why our ancient enemy wants to preserve irreciprocity – to preserve parasitism upon the productive people.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1552598259 Timestamp) EITHER YOU ACT LIKE JESUS OR YOU DON’T. I separate the catholic church as a political organization, from belief in the supernatural and occult, from christianity as a system of alien myths and dogmas, from imitating person jesus regardless of the primitivism of words attributed to him, from the general need for simple people to escape the continuous judgement of self and others in a world where doing so by some standard other than selfishness is non rational. What we call ‘christian’ is a semitic political religious dogma taught by a greek bureaucracy over an aryan social religious relationship between peoples and the world. One is a member of the christian system of behaviors because he behaves more like other christians than he does members of every other rious order – not because what he thinks or believes. Otherwise all of christianity is false. These are empirical statements – not justificationary statements. Either you act in practice under the accumulated behaviors of our aryan, roman, greek, and semitic systems of thought, or you don’t. The degree with which you fantasize about it is merely a statement of your demand to insulate yourself from counter signaling by others. Which is the reason for religion: counter-signaling our alienation with some form of mindfulness as our relative value to the polity decreases with political scale. This is merely true. God and the universe are one and the same. Jesus told us one set of rules that make us more compatible with the universe, and therefore god. These rules are the optimum ingroup social order. There is none other. 1) the eradication of hatred from the human heart. 2) the extension of kinship love to non-kin. 3) the demand for personal acts of charity and personal cost, 4) the extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war. If you practice these rules then you are acting in concert with the universe and god such that no other set of practices will produce a superior end for you or others. That’s just the science of it all. I don’t need woo woo. I am not afraid of my station in relation to others. I do not fear my betters – I welcome them. The laws of the universe are the origin of truth aboutt hat universe. The natural law of human cooperation consists of reciprocity and the teachings of jesus. Neither set of rules is complicated. They are just so simple that they leave us no means of deceit by which to lie to ourselves or others.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1552604083 Timestamp) ^I can only speak comfortably with James about christianity because he doesn’t try to weasel me into any position. Most of the time, when christians get me into a discourse they try to make me justify a falsehood. this forces me to retaliate. And I don’t like it. Because I have to attack the faith and that’s not constructive. I have a very simple principle: faith is faith, and science is science. In a dispute between faith and science it is science. However, science has nothing to say about faith. Principally because that which drives our faith may be scientifically EXPLICABLE, but it’s not scientifically SATISFIABLE. This is very similar to the mind body problem or the memory experience problem. That is, that there is a great deal of difference between explaining the physics of why we have the experiences we do, and the experience and result of that physics. I don’t find this hard to understand but apparently this is hard for most people to understand. This is why I was searching through the online christian leadership – because there aren’t any ‘great thinkers’ out there trying to solve ‘our problem’ which includes the problem of our faith post-darwin and einstein. Most are living in the past but not living in their faith. We must evolve our faith. Evolve it into a militant defensive faith. not one that is dependent upon a pagan aristocracy of arms and armor to provide it with survival. I want to restore a militant christianity just as the viking invasions restored a militant christianity, before which europe could not defend herself given the celtic holocaust, the germanic migrations to fill the vacuum, and the roman collapse and germanic and arab migrations to fill the vacuum. It may be that the west must always have pagan aristocracy and christian priesthood, and a commercial nobility in constant competition in order not to fall into the failings of each. The law is the vehicle. The natural law is compatible with christianity. The question is only whether christians will fight, or if this fight is in the hands of a few pagans who must once again save christianity from islamic and jewish conquest. If christians will fight then they are allies of our people. If they will not, then they are allies of our enemy and only pagans and heathens allies of our people. Only those who fight matter.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1552598259 Timestamp) EITHER YOU ACT LIKE JESUS OR YOU DON’T. I separate the catholic church as a political organization, from belief in the supernatural and occult, from christianity as a system of alien myths and dogmas, from imitating person jesus regardless of the primitivism of words attributed to him, from the general need for simple people to escape the continuous judgement of self and others in a world where doing so by some standard other than selfishness is non rational. What we call ‘christian’ is a semitic political religious dogma taught by a greek bureaucracy over an aryan social religious relationship between peoples and the world. One is a member of the christian system of behaviors because he behaves more like other christians than he does members of every other rious order – not because what he thinks or believes. Otherwise all of christianity is false. These are empirical statements – not justificationary statements. Either you act in practice under the accumulated behaviors of our aryan, roman, greek, and semitic systems of thought, or you don’t. The degree with which you fantasize about it is merely a statement of your demand to insulate yourself from counter signaling by others. Which is the reason for religion: counter-signaling our alienation with some form of mindfulness as our relative value to the polity decreases with political scale. This is merely true. God and the universe are one and the same. Jesus told us one set of rules that make us more compatible with the universe, and therefore god. These rules are the optimum ingroup social order. There is none other. 1) the eradication of hatred from the human heart. 2) the extension of kinship love to non-kin. 3) the demand for personal acts of charity and personal cost, 4) the extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war. If you practice these rules then you are acting in concert with the universe and god such that no other set of practices will produce a superior end for you or others. That’s just the science of it all. I don’t need woo woo. I am not afraid of my station in relation to others. I do not fear my betters – I welcome them. The laws of the universe are the origin of truth aboutt hat universe. The natural law of human cooperation consists of reciprocity and the teachings of jesus. Neither set of rules is complicated. They are just so simple that they leave us no means of deceit by which to lie to ourselves or others.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1552604083 Timestamp) ^I can only speak comfortably with James about christianity because he doesn’t try to weasel me into any position. Most of the time, when christians get me into a discourse they try to make me justify a falsehood. this forces me to retaliate. And I don’t like it. Because I have to attack the faith and that’s not constructive. I have a very simple principle: faith is faith, and science is science. In a dispute between faith and science it is science. However, science has nothing to say about faith. Principally because that which drives our faith may be scientifically EXPLICABLE, but it’s not scientifically SATISFIABLE. This is very similar to the mind body problem or the memory experience problem. That is, that there is a great deal of difference between explaining the physics of why we have the experiences we do, and the experience and result of that physics. I don’t find this hard to understand but apparently this is hard for most people to understand. This is why I was searching through the online christian leadership – because there aren’t any ‘great thinkers’ out there trying to solve ‘our problem’ which includes the problem of our faith post-darwin and einstein. Most are living in the past but not living in their faith. We must evolve our faith. Evolve it into a militant defensive faith. not one that is dependent upon a pagan aristocracy of arms and armor to provide it with survival. I want to restore a militant christianity just as the viking invasions restored a militant christianity, before which europe could not defend herself given the celtic holocaust, the germanic migrations to fill the vacuum, and the roman collapse and germanic and arab migrations to fill the vacuum. It may be that the west must always have pagan aristocracy and christian priesthood, and a commercial nobility in constant competition in order not to fall into the failings of each. The law is the vehicle. The natural law is compatible with christianity. The question is only whether christians will fight, or if this fight is in the hands of a few pagans who must once again save christianity from islamic and jewish conquest. If christians will fight then they are allies of our people. If they will not, then they are allies of our enemy and only pagans and heathens allies of our people. Only those who fight matter.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1552669619 Timestamp) GENERATION JONES 55-65: TECH+DEINDUSTRIALIZATION AND THE FAILURE OF THE MARXIST SOCIALIST PROGRAM When I was in high school we had the oil crisis, the evaporation of the postwar advantage, the fall if iran, near zero chance of employment out of college, and the conversion of marxism-socialism to postmodernism (lying). Gates, Jobs, and Ellison, Halloween, Star Wars, Alien, Blade Runner, Indiana Jones, Neuromancer —“Generation Jones is the social cohort of the latter half of the Baby boomers to the first years of Generation X. The term was first coined by the author Jonathan Pontell, who identified the cohort as those born from 1954 to 1965 in the U.S. who came of age during the oil crisis, stagflation, and the Carter presidency, rather than during the 1960s, but slightly before Gen X. Other sources place the starting point at 1956 or 1957. Unlike older baby boomers, most of Generation Jones did not grow up with World War II veterans as fathers, and for them there was no compulsory military service and no defining political cause, as opposition to United States involvement in the Vietnam War had been for the older boomers. … The name “Generation Jones” has several connotations, including a large anonymous generation, a “keeping up with the Joneses” competitiveness and the slang word “jones” or “jonesing”, meaning a yearning or craving. It is said that Jonesers were given huge expectations as children in the 1960s, and then confronted with a different reality as they came of age during a long period of mass unemployment and when de-industrialization arrived full force in the mid-late 1970s and 1980s, leaving them with a certain unrequited “jonesing” quality for the more prosperous days of the past. “— —“Originally, GenJonesers were mistakenly lumped in with Boomers because of their mutually high birth rates. But generations stem from shared formative experiences, not head counts. Over time, the original mistaken Boomer Generation definition has become widely discredited, with many top experts now embracing Generation Jones as a distinct generation. These experts underline the importance of distinguishing between the post-WWII demographic boom in babies versus the cultural generations born during that time. Jonesers were born between the mid-1950s and mid-1960s, with the exact birth years varying from nation to nation. In the U.S. and most Western countries, the birth years most often used for GenJones are 1954-1965. Extensive research has shown dramatic differences between the collective personality traits of Boomers versus Jonesers.”—
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1552669619 Timestamp) GENERATION JONES 55-65: TECH+DEINDUSTRIALIZATION AND THE FAILURE OF THE MARXIST SOCIALIST PROGRAM When I was in high school we had the oil crisis, the evaporation of the postwar advantage, the fall if iran, near zero chance of employment out of college, and the conversion of marxism-socialism to postmodernism (lying). Gates, Jobs, and Ellison, Halloween, Star Wars, Alien, Blade Runner, Indiana Jones, Neuromancer —“Generation Jones is the social cohort of the latter half of the Baby boomers to the first years of Generation X. The term was first coined by the author Jonathan Pontell, who identified the cohort as those born from 1954 to 1965 in the U.S. who came of age during the oil crisis, stagflation, and the Carter presidency, rather than during the 1960s, but slightly before Gen X. Other sources place the starting point at 1956 or 1957. Unlike older baby boomers, most of Generation Jones did not grow up with World War II veterans as fathers, and for them there was no compulsory military service and no defining political cause, as opposition to United States involvement in the Vietnam War had been for the older boomers. … The name “Generation Jones” has several connotations, including a large anonymous generation, a “keeping up with the Joneses” competitiveness and the slang word “jones” or “jonesing”, meaning a yearning or craving. It is said that Jonesers were given huge expectations as children in the 1960s, and then confronted with a different reality as they came of age during a long period of mass unemployment and when de-industrialization arrived full force in the mid-late 1970s and 1980s, leaving them with a certain unrequited “jonesing” quality for the more prosperous days of the past. “— —“Originally, GenJonesers were mistakenly lumped in with Boomers because of their mutually high birth rates. But generations stem from shared formative experiences, not head counts. Over time, the original mistaken Boomer Generation definition has become widely discredited, with many top experts now embracing Generation Jones as a distinct generation. These experts underline the importance of distinguishing between the post-WWII demographic boom in babies versus the cultural generations born during that time. Jonesers were born between the mid-1950s and mid-1960s, with the exact birth years varying from nation to nation. In the U.S. and most Western countries, the birth years most often used for GenJones are 1954-1965. Extensive research has shown dramatic differences between the collective personality traits of Boomers versus Jonesers.”—
-
(FB 1552681557 Timestamp) Religion gives advice – wisdom literature. Politics gi
(FB 1552681557 Timestamp) Religion gives advice – wisdom literature. Politics gives law Science gives truth If your religion contains law, it is not religion but politics. If you worship your politics it is still politics. Your law is either compatible with natural law or it is not. Their laws are not compatible with natural law Their religions are not religions but politics. As politics they are acts of war. As acts of war they may and must be fought as war. There is only one enemy in the world today amoung all civilizaed peoples. It is the great lie of abraham and all that descended from him. We have been at war since the persians invaded the aegean. We have been at war since the greeks crossed into mesopotamia. We have been at war since the romans crossed into the levant. There is only one enemy for the rest of the world. it is the cancer that drives world conflict. And it has for more than two thousand years.