(FB 1550407650 Timestamp) PROPERTARIANISM VS IT’S APPLICATION The law exists so that those with material interests (power) preserve the value of cooperation by forcing people into, and limiting them to, the market, and denying them non-market means (within the limits of cost and ability). Propertarianism explains how to use this law (logic) to suppress those forms of parasitism that are currently not, because we lacked a means of doing so. In particular (and I have only come to understand this myself over the past few years) it suppresses baiting into moral hazard, which is the general technique of exploitation that is in use. (including your sophism above). P it’s purely empirical. “people do this”, “this is why”, “self interest of those with interests”, “where almost all but the marginal cases have interests.” You can build any political order with P that you want precisely because it is an algorithmic logic (grammar), as long as you do it truthfully. To falsify P would require you falsify rational choice, reciprocity, and self interest. To state you would prefer to built some other form of government no matter how honest or dishonest, productive or parasitic, would still be explicable in P, and peoples’ behavior under it would still be universally expliable with P, because P is not a philosophy (should) but a science (is). It is the science and logic of what we call the psychological, linguistic, social sciences, and political sciences. Now you can ‘bitch’ about the fact that I use this logic to advocate for rule of law – the most parsimonious expression of that science – because you like or do not like that particular world (because it would crush ‘creativity in dishonesty’) which means ‘witty people’ have no more utility in their manipulation of others in order to obtain self image, social status, and various forms of influence. But that is the point altogether. P is simply ‘true’. What you do it it is a matter of your (power-group’s) preferences. I prefer to crush the abrahamic deceits (baiting into moral hazard by sophisms, pseudosciences, supernaturalisms, and deceits) and to use this to save my people from their lies. Maybe you prefer otherwise. But I am fairly sure that the mainstream will prefer my argument and policy recommendations over the alternatives and this lowers their resistance to its implementation relative to your alternatives. Again. Please don’t try to be smarter. You aren’t in the first place (even close) and P is quite a superpower – just like reason, empiricism, and science were superpowers before it. The more I use P, the better I get at it, the more I understand the revolution in human thought and experience that would be brought about is as great as the previous revolutions provided by western thought (reason, empiricism, science).
Form: Mini Essay
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550423126 Timestamp) CLOSING IN ON METAPHYSICS AS NON-EXISTENT, or simply cogn sci: demarcation between observable and experienceable. What is metaphysics other than either operational description(existential) or fiction(inexistential)? Why is M not just another scale of physics just as chemistry another scale of atomic states, and atomic states just another scale of particles, and particles just another scale of fundamental forces, and fundamental forces just another scale of information? Sentience and consiousness are just another scale of the physical world in operation. So just as space time is the result of underlying physical reactions, so are experience and consiousness. I am getting closer I think to understanding the confusion of those who claim it exists but I still have to agree with those who say it is handwaving. AFAIK. the human experience is just a continuation of physics, and all operations and experiences explicable in fairly simple terms the underlying mechanics of which only matter in producing aggregates. Metaphysics as far as I know, simply means the ontology(paradigms) of cognitive science at different levels of commensurable operations (scales), just as physics consists of ontologies(paradigms) at different levels of commensurable operations(scales), and I have seen nothing to alter that understanding (even in aristotle) that proposition other than attempts at sophism, pseudoscience, occult, and fraud. And I am absolutely positive that this will persist. My understanding of the reason is that different disciplines use incompatible (incommensurable) paradigms (ontologies) and as such people have to fictionalize relations between them. However, operatios (analogy to experience no matter how difficult to experience) serves as a universally commensurable system of measurement within and across all scales whether physical or cognitive (or linguistic) and as such M is not a discipline but simply cog sci, and all attempts to say otherwise are simply fictionalisms to compensate for incommensurability generating demand for fictions. In other words fictions produce conflation inflation and opportunity for inductive and deductive error from false premises (ontologies, paradigms), and simply serve as sources of ignorance, fraud, and deceit (Popper). Ergo, metaphysics consists simply an extension of physics in the same commensurable language of operations, and there are not multiple metaphysics, just ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion and obscurantism, fictionalism and deceit.. And I can’t find any alternative explanation. And I’m not at all unique in this understanding. (Van Frassen, McGinn, Thomassen cited in SEP). And the anti-positivist criticism does not hold against falsificationism/critical naturalism – only asks for commensurability across scales, to maintain coherence and parsimony in defense against error, bias, fiction and deceit. And I am still stuck with the non-anglo desire for empathy with ontologies (experiencing) rather than objectivity(describing). Is this purely cultural or are scandinavian(northern european) peoples genetically different in that we have greater distance (agency) between intuition and cognition. AFAIK every problem I have encountered that we call metaphysics is simply a grammatical error. In fact, I’m not sure philosophy exists of much other than grammatical errors (Malformed calculations). And this is because language is a system of measurement that is only as useful as grammatical demands (tolerances) allow. And that as a system of measurement the only deflationary and inflationary method of speech is operations. While certain philosophers have made this claim and have been attacked, these attacks occur under the fallacy of closure in the system of language itself. Which is a common sophomoric argument in philosophical discourse. The only closure is reality itself in toto.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550407650 Timestamp) PROPERTARIANISM VS IT’S APPLICATION The law exists so that those with material interests (power) preserve the value of cooperation by forcing people into, and limiting them to, the market, and denying them non-market means (within the limits of cost and ability). Propertarianism explains how to use this law (logic) to suppress those forms of parasitism that are currently not, because we lacked a means of doing so. In particular (and I have only come to understand this myself over the past few years) it suppresses baiting into moral hazard, which is the general technique of exploitation that is in use. (including your sophism above). P it’s purely empirical. “people do this”, “this is why”, “self interest of those with interests”, “where almost all but the marginal cases have interests.” You can build any political order with P that you want precisely because it is an algorithmic logic (grammar), as long as you do it truthfully. To falsify P would require you falsify rational choice, reciprocity, and self interest. To state you would prefer to built some other form of government no matter how honest or dishonest, productive or parasitic, would still be explicable in P, and peoples’ behavior under it would still be universally expliable with P, because P is not a philosophy (should) but a science (is). It is the science and logic of what we call the psychological, linguistic, social sciences, and political sciences. Now you can ‘bitch’ about the fact that I use this logic to advocate for rule of law – the most parsimonious expression of that science – because you like or do not like that particular world (because it would crush ‘creativity in dishonesty’) which means ‘witty people’ have no more utility in their manipulation of others in order to obtain self image, social status, and various forms of influence. But that is the point altogether. P is simply ‘true’. What you do it it is a matter of your (power-group’s) preferences. I prefer to crush the abrahamic deceits (baiting into moral hazard by sophisms, pseudosciences, supernaturalisms, and deceits) and to use this to save my people from their lies. Maybe you prefer otherwise. But I am fairly sure that the mainstream will prefer my argument and policy recommendations over the alternatives and this lowers their resistance to its implementation relative to your alternatives. Again. Please don’t try to be smarter. You aren’t in the first place (even close) and P is quite a superpower – just like reason, empiricism, and science were superpowers before it. The more I use P, the better I get at it, the more I understand the revolution in human thought and experience that would be brought about is as great as the previous revolutions provided by western thought (reason, empiricism, science).
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550437292 Timestamp) TALKING TO THE GODS THAT EXIST I talk to my god every day. Fairly often. The difference is that i have a scientific understanding of this god as a sort of low level ‘software’ I consult, and response as intuition or feeling rather than high level software like speech. This knowledge poses no problem for me. It is simply true. And it works. We all share similar versions of this software in every faith that depends upon fictional characters. This software does its job. For some reason the fact that this software is in our physical brains rather than in some imaginary alternate plane or universe seems to be difficult for others. And they would rather believe in magic men with superpowers, than a bit of low level software that we all run at all times and consciously and unconsciously update with new tweaks from one another. I mean… this is how gods, heroes, the dead, actually exist – as information. And once you understand that the universe consist entirely of what we have no better word for than ‘information’, this makes a lot more sense. Over time my ‘god’ has ‘revealed himself’ (meaning transformed into) something between An ancient oak grove, the bodies of my ancestors, Odin, Aristotle, and Aurelius. Because it shares those … similarities. He is a god of my experience and making. And he rarely if ever fails me. So I talk to him all the time whenever I think “what should I do?” about anything meaningful. Then I write down what I think after that and I’m done. Because writing words – making them real – tames the intuition (subconsious).
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550437292 Timestamp) TALKING TO THE GODS THAT EXIST I talk to my god every day. Fairly often. The difference is that i have a scientific understanding of this god as a sort of low level ‘software’ I consult, and response as intuition or feeling rather than high level software like speech. This knowledge poses no problem for me. It is simply true. And it works. We all share similar versions of this software in every faith that depends upon fictional characters. This software does its job. For some reason the fact that this software is in our physical brains rather than in some imaginary alternate plane or universe seems to be difficult for others. And they would rather believe in magic men with superpowers, than a bit of low level software that we all run at all times and consciously and unconsciously update with new tweaks from one another. I mean… this is how gods, heroes, the dead, actually exist – as information. And once you understand that the universe consist entirely of what we have no better word for than ‘information’, this makes a lot more sense. Over time my ‘god’ has ‘revealed himself’ (meaning transformed into) something between An ancient oak grove, the bodies of my ancestors, Odin, Aristotle, and Aurelius. Because it shares those … similarities. He is a god of my experience and making. And he rarely if ever fails me. So I talk to him all the time whenever I think “what should I do?” about anything meaningful. Then I write down what I think after that and I’m done. Because writing words – making them real – tames the intuition (subconsious).
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550503635 Timestamp) AGAINST CULTS. PROPERTARIANISM IS FOR EVERYONE. Every group with every grammar of cognition can use Propertarianism: religious, ideological philosophical, scientific, or practical. We can all use this law to unite behind policy rather than religion, philosophy, or ideology. So don’t make me a ‘cult’ leader. Don’t ask me to be one. I’m not special. I’m just a guy working on one of the great problems of our age – and because of the great minds before me, and the shoulders I can stand upon, I did. So I’m not special. Propertarianism is like having a superpower, just like aristotelian reason, empiricism, and the scientific method were like a superpower in ages past. So understand, it’s not me it’s the methodology. I’m only special because this superpower is rare at present. With some work you can learn this ‘superpower’. And then for you too, the world will ‘fit together in very nice clean obvious puzzle pieces’. But I’m not important. I’m not special, and I expect to generate leaders who will use this superpower. I prefer to wear my metaphorical Odin robes and pointy hat, and advise leaders – not be one. Aristotle changed the world of mind but it is Alexander who conquered the world of men.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550499368 Timestamp) YOU ARE DYING OF YOUR FALSE BELIEFS If my arguments fell apart someone would make the arguments that makes them fall apart. But no one does. They just assume some ‘savior’ will come around and make them for them. There must be someone!!! No. There isn’t. Which is why you fail. What you value – your drug of choice – is killing you and your people. Choose your ridiculous little lies of cowardice and humility or choose truth, history, science, war, arrogance and survival of your people. If your idea survives your people will die. If your idea dies your people will survive. I teach RADICAL INTOLERANCE, which is the mirror image of christian tolerance. I teach RADICAL TRUTH which is the mirror image of semitic deceits I teach RADICAL LAW which is the mirror image of your ‘storytelling’ I teach this because YOU ARE DYING OF YOUR FALSE BELIEFS. Survival is forward into truth, not backward into the dark ages.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550495715 Timestamp) OF COURSE YOU ARE A CHRISTIAN – AMONG OTHER THINGS —I’m a Christian because I need tradition and morality some kind of way….[that i can intuit rather than calculate like law, engineering, chemistry or math, because intuition is almost always better with complexity of human life than reason.]—Monica Marquez I’m a Christian because history and science tell me that despite all the falsehood, lies, and propaganda, that the rules that are those values taught by our heathen, aryan, christian, and militia traditions are what has made western civlization more successful than the rest, by continuous improvement of our truthfulness and trustworthiness with one another, and the radical difference in the velocity of cooperation compared to other civilizations, and the radical velocity of innovation and adaptation, and the radical difference in quality of life that results from it. I am a heathen, an aryan, an aristotelian, a christian and a warrior because this is what it means to be a european – a member of that civilization that dragged humanity kicking and screaming against its will, out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, hard labor, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, and the chaos of nature indifferent to our existence, in a universe largely hostile to advanced life. Curt Doolittle Feb 2019
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550503635 Timestamp) AGAINST CULTS. PROPERTARIANISM IS FOR EVERYONE. Every group with every grammar of cognition can use Propertarianism: religious, ideological philosophical, scientific, or practical. We can all use this law to unite behind policy rather than religion, philosophy, or ideology. So don’t make me a ‘cult’ leader. Don’t ask me to be one. I’m not special. I’m just a guy working on one of the great problems of our age – and because of the great minds before me, and the shoulders I can stand upon, I did. So I’m not special. Propertarianism is like having a superpower, just like aristotelian reason, empiricism, and the scientific method were like a superpower in ages past. So understand, it’s not me it’s the methodology. I’m only special because this superpower is rare at present. With some work you can learn this ‘superpower’. And then for you too, the world will ‘fit together in very nice clean obvious puzzle pieces’. But I’m not important. I’m not special, and I expect to generate leaders who will use this superpower. I prefer to wear my metaphorical Odin robes and pointy hat, and advise leaders – not be one. Aristotle changed the world of mind but it is Alexander who conquered the world of men.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550495715 Timestamp) OF COURSE YOU ARE A CHRISTIAN – AMONG OTHER THINGS —I’m a Christian because I need tradition and morality some kind of way….[that i can intuit rather than calculate like law, engineering, chemistry or math, because intuition is almost always better with complexity of human life than reason.]—Monica Marquez I’m a Christian because history and science tell me that despite all the falsehood, lies, and propaganda, that the rules that are those values taught by our heathen, aryan, christian, and militia traditions are what has made western civlization more successful than the rest, by continuous improvement of our truthfulness and trustworthiness with one another, and the radical difference in the velocity of cooperation compared to other civilizations, and the radical velocity of innovation and adaptation, and the radical difference in quality of life that results from it. I am a heathen, an aryan, an aristotelian, a christian and a warrior because this is what it means to be a european – a member of that civilization that dragged humanity kicking and screaming against its will, out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, hard labor, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, and the chaos of nature indifferent to our existence, in a universe largely hostile to advanced life. Curt Doolittle Feb 2019