Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • NO LAW – A VIA NEGATIVA – IS NOT ENOUGH. BUT WHAT RELIGIOUS STRATEGY, NARRATIVE,

    NO LAW – A VIA NEGATIVA – IS NOT ENOUGH. BUT WHAT RELIGIOUS STRATEGY, NARRATIVE, GRAMMAR, AND DEBT ARE SO?

    (important)

    Of the spectrum of Grammars I know of, including but not limited to: Supernatural, Mythical, Literary, Ideal, Magical, Pseudoscientific, Fictional, Ordinary Language, Written Language, Testimonial Language, Legal, Economic, Mathematic, Economic (Models), Algorithms, Engineering, Medical Protocols, Accounting, Finance, Logic, Mathematics and Arithmetic:

    a) Both Law and Morality evidentially reflexive and coevolutionary not hierarchical.

    b) Compare:

    Commodity Money (Proper) and Fiat Money,Credit Money, Money Substitutes

    -vs- Law(proper), and Command, Legislation, Regulation, Arbitrary Ruling

    -vs- Morality (Proper), and Institutionalized Morality, Normative Morality, Individual Morality.

    …. and by disambiguation, question just which ‘law’ or ‘morality’ or ‘money’ one is talking about when one makes an argument about the SERIES’ of law, morality, or money. empirically speaking international law is reciprocity, including oath, truth, duty to perform. Because there are no other requirements between those who are neutral or enemies. While within a polity we are cooperating to produce a portfolio of rights(income, credit) and obligations(expense, debt) the disambiguation of which is beyond the abilities of ordinary people other than a vague sense of ‘proportionality’.

    c) People require a group strategy, and a means of reinforcing it a binding narrative for cognitive decidability (altruistic punishment, non conflict, cooperation, signaling). This binding narrative radically decreases the burden of intuitionistic calculation of trust and standardizes ethical(interpersonal) and moral (extrapersonal) permissible and impermissible display word and deed. Without these SYSTEMS OF MEASUREMENT they will continually conflict (as we see with ‘multiculturalism’ as a means of undermining government, culture, tradition, and civilization) and fracture into races, cults, tribes, and clans decreasing group competitive ability (survivability).

    d) As far as I know, Organized religion vs Traditional Religion, evolved to SEPARATE macro (Politically Organized) groups, so that they could separate and compete (Iranic vs Indo Iranic). In other words, just as warfare has moved from military to economic to religious to propaganda in the modern world, warfare moved from military to economic to religious in the age of Transformation.

    e) As far as I know Political Law versus Customary Law evolved in response to governance of heterogeneous people (Middle east), beginning with normalizing punishments to prevent retaliation cycles between clans and tribes with different traditional standards of punishment. In other words, we are more sensitive to differences in punishment (altruistic punishment, especially) than we are to the content of proscribed norms themselves.

    f) As far as I know Historical Mythology serves as mythos (binding narrative) for successful peoples Ancient Europeans and all East asians (and arguably egyptians). Given our new understanding of the origin of middle eastern religion as an evolution of the burial, and it’s nexus as a trade route between the continents, it is easier to understand how pilgrimage, heavens, supernaturalism and authoritarianism evolved in that region amid the continuous wars between so many non-kin. Both christianity and buddhism were forcibly imposed by the governments after multiple failures in order to create a docile populace. In other words, those who need false gods are those who have no worthy ancestors, and have not obtained sufficient control of territory via organization, economics, culture, tradition, and warfare to create an historical mythos and their binding narrative institutions, while those of us who have need no fictitious myths and their binding narrative institutions.

    g) So the question is that given the spectrum of inherited debt-respect from 1- nature, ancestor, hero, founder, nation, in a binding narrative, producing knowledge wisdom and correspondence to reality to 2- Idealism, Literary characters in Character and Role Archetypes and Anthropomorphic Archetypes, to 3- Fantastical, supernatural, non-rational, authoritarian, ignorance-inducing non-correspondence with and active denial of reality.

    h) And so Territorial, Political, Economic, Demographic, Genetic Differences all generate Demand for a Binding Literature of the WEAK, the Powerless, the ABLE, and the POWERFUL – but in no case does this appear to be other than a portfolio of literatures except islam and judaism. In western civilization we have, as most have, relied upon Our ancient Heathen myths (childhood, family), Traditional Myths, Political Religions (formal Myths), Law (social and economic rules), Literary (temporary myths), and Fashions (ever expiring myths). And in western civilization and to a lesser degree in eastern civilization we have done so. The major difference being that the southeast and east were not conquered by Semitic Heterogeneous Political Religions, and preserved their natural religion (and justifiably consider us foolish for ours).

    i) And I cannot tell the difference between the addiction response by a herd of people practicing ritualizing a falsehood despite reality, and a tribe of people and their addiction response TO ONE ANOTHER AND THEIR HISTORY. Other than … that drugs sedate us, and drugs that escape from reality are desirable even if destructive.

    j) As such I will continue my efforts to create the optimum Science, Law, Tradition, Religion for my people and mankind that are the least infected by falsehood and the production of submission, ignorance, vulnerability, and dysgenia. 😉

    Do you see that it’s disambiguation and testimony I practice, and that the outcome of doing so is Natural Law – but what trades and portfolios we construct within that Natural Law’s requirement for reciprocity within the limits of proportionality are infinitely malleable.

    —

    In response to:

    Culture Precedes Law by Troy Camplin

    https://medium.com/@troycamplin/culture-precedes-law-183763eaa861

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-27 10:03:00 UTC

  • On Intelligent Design: I Support Truthful Speech

    —“Are you saying you support darwanism over Christianity or intelligent design?”—Mark E. Haney

    1 – I cannot falsify evolution, and every single evidence from the fundamental structure of the universe to the imagination of man is a product of a very small number of possibilities in very great permutation, just as limited numbers of sounds, characters, and numbers can be arranged in infinitely complex permutations. 2 – The five rules of christianity are,logically, rationally(incentives), scientifically(empirically) the optimum prisoner’s dilemma (trust building) strategy, and I cannot falsify either or their relation. There is a reason christians are wealthier than competing cults. 3 – Information can only be stored in some memory or other, information stored must be abstracted (generalized) in order to consume less calories and volume that the original matter and its changes in state over time. I cannot falsify that statement – it’s a physical and logical impossibility. As to what I ‘Support’: I support truthful speech. Truthful speech can only consist of what I can testify to. I can only testify to that which is: … – categorically consistent … – logically consistent … – empirically(observably) consistent … – operationally consistent … – rationally consistent … – reciprocally consistent where it is: … – parsimonious … – scope consistent … – and fully accounted … – within stated limits and where … – due diligence has been demonstrated, and where … – one’s statements are warrantied by restitution if one errs. I cannot testify to anything other than. 1. Realism, 2. Naturalism, 3. Operationalism Christianity survives under natural law as does all literature under natural law, in that the parables advocate natural law, despite being stated in language and grammar of myth, instead of the language and grammar of Testimony (law). Deliver faith and obedience to any gods compatible with natural law. Deliver Truth, Duty, and Reciprocity to mankind because Truth, Duty, and Reciprocity ARE the natural law.

    —“The point is, you don’t have to believe in anything supernatural to understand why natural law works. In fact, it hinders you. But as long as we both believe in the natural law, regardless of where it comes from, we can still be allies. I have to have faith in that law to deliver but that’s all. You believe whatever you want but in reality, evolution is the most intelligent design possible.”—Martin Štěpán

  • Propertarianism Protects Christianity

    “God doesn’t force us to believe. Why over time people do believe on their own accord when they are ready. He isn’t negating Christianity, he’s using logical terminology in law terms. RECIPROCITY means equal across the board to all including those that don’t believe or do I’m a Christian and I agree with Doolittle’s opinions. He’s speaking truth. Propertarian protects Christianity because it’s compatible with NATURAL LAW.” — Ben Boss

  • Propertarianism Protects Christianity

    “God doesn’t force us to believe. Why over time people do believe on their own accord when they are ready. He isn’t negating Christianity, he’s using logical terminology in law terms. RECIPROCITY means equal across the board to all including those that don’t believe or do I’m a Christian and I agree with Doolittle’s opinions. He’s speaking truth. Propertarian protects Christianity because it’s compatible with NATURAL LAW.” — Ben Boss

  • EVOLUTION VS INTELLIGENT DESIGN (core) —“Are you saying you support Darwanism

    EVOLUTION VS INTELLIGENT DESIGN

    (core)

    —“Are you saying you support Darwanism over Christianity or intelligent design?”—Mark E. Haney

    1 – I cannot falsify evolution and every single evidence from the fundamental structure of the universe to the imagination of man is a product of a very small number of possibilities in very great permutation, just as limited numbers of sounds, characters, and numbers can be arranged in infinitely complex permutations.

    2 – The five rules of christianity are,logically, rationally(incentives), scientifically(empirically) the optimum prisoner’s dilemma (trust building) strategy, and I cannot falsify either or their relation. There is a reason christians are wealthier than competing cults.

    3 – Information can only be stored in some memory or other, information stored must be abstracted (generalized) in order to consume less calories and volume that the original matter and its changes in state over time. I cannot falsify that statement – it’s a physical and logical impossibility.

    As to what I ‘Support’:

    I support truthful speech.

    Truthful speech can only consist of what I can testify to.

    I can only testify to that which is:

    – categorically consistent

    – Logically consistent

    – empirically(observably) consistent

    – operationally consistent

    – rationally consistent

    – reciprocally consistent

    where

    – parsimonious

    – scope consistent

    – and fully accounted

    – within stated limits

    and where

    – due diligence has been demonstrated,

    and where

    – one’s statements are warrantied by restitution if one errs.

    I cannot testify to anything other than.

    1. Realism,

    2. Naturalism,

    3. Operationalism

    Nor can anyone else.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-24 02:47:00 UTC

  • WHY UNIVERSAL NATIONALISM VS GLOBALISM by Curt Doolittle —“I do universal nati

    WHY UNIVERSAL NATIONALISM VS GLOBALISM

    by Curt Doolittle

    —“I do universal nationalism. Why? Because natural law judges it as the only not-immoral means of cooperation. But that doesn’t tell you much. Instead it’s because “all men are distant relations cooperating to raise their people by the production of commons information, goods, and services, best suited to doing so despite our differences in rate of development bias in temperament and bias in distribution of abilities.” And if we construct states as extensions of the family, household, clan, tribe, and nation, we have elites who serve the interests of their people on their terms, and the smallest proximity-to-influence-and power that is possible. And we ameliorate our differences not through politics, power, and commons, but through trade of information, goods, and services. If we do otherwise, under globalism, we put those people into competition, where there is one small global elite with interest in one another, and a host of common people suffering their rule. So there is no system of rule superior to universal nationalism, with tolerance for migration of elites for trade purposes – but prohibiting them from local political enfranchise and social involvement, and public speech.”–

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-23 07:41:00 UTC

  • THREE INSIGHTS TODAY 1) Constitution I made a two mistakes in sketching a draft

    THREE INSIGHTS TODAY

    1) Constitution

    I made a two mistakes in sketching a draft of the constitution:

    … i) Not separating the law from the constitution itself. The Law is The Law regardless of the constitution created under it. The constitution is an application of the law. The policies are actions within the constitution AND the law. So I have to reorganize a bit and make the law ‘the law’.

    … And ii) I conflated the Law, the forms of government we can choose under it, with the restitutions due us for abuse of the previous constitution. With the threats of what terms we will impose if that constitution and those restitutions are not granted. (escalation terms).

    2) Western Group Rhetoric doesn’t Consider Fraud and Deceit

    We have been high trust so long we forgot the alternatives. And as such our rhetoric and our position in debate is one of ignorance, or error, or cognitive bias – we discuss cognitive biases and fallacies at length. But we do not discuss deceits with the same depth. Largely because we are not practitioners of them. So our Enemies are however, not engaging in ignorance, error, or cognitive bias -they are engaging in deceit in order to perpetuate a fraud. And no Thief submits to reason, nor abandons his theft except under punishment and forcible restitution.

    So part of the work we have ahead of us is systematically training people in not only the errors and biases, but deceits. And adding the deceits to our listings of fallacies and Cognitive biases.

    3) Honest Discourse Terms on the Taboos

    The systematic attempt to render subjects taboo has to end. So I’m going to specifically address the taboos, and campaign against their suppression.

    I’ll add this to the class action.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-22 21:47:31 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102662828927959063

  • Three Insights Today

    1) Constitution I made a two mistakes in sketching a draft of the constitution:

    … i) Not separating the law from the constitution itself. The Law is The Law regardless of the constitution created under it. The constitution is an application of the law. The policies are actions within the constitution AND the law. So I have to reorganize a bit and make the law ‘the law’.

    … And ii) I conflated the Law, the forms of government we can choose under it, with the restitutions due us for abuse of the previous constitution. With the threats of what terms we will impose if that constitution and those restitutions are not granted. (escalation terms). 2) Western Group Rhetoric doesn’t Consider Fraud and Deceit We have been high trust so long we forgot the alternatives. And as such our rhetoric and our position in debate is one of ignorance, or error, or cognitive bias – we discuss cognitive biases and fallacies at length. But we do not discuss deceits with the same depth. Largely because we are not practitioners of them. So our Enemies are however, not engaging in ignorance, error, or cognitive bias -they are engaging in deceit in order to perpetuate a fraud. And no Thief submits to reason, nor abandons his theft except under punishment and forcible restitution. So part of the work we have ahead of us is systematically training people in not only the errors and biases, but deceits.  And adding the deceits to our listings of fallacies and Cognitive biases. 3) Honest Discourse Terms on the Taboos The systematic attempt to render subjects taboo has to end.  So I’m going to specifically address the taboos, and campaign against their suppression. I’ll add this to the class action.  

  • People Thinking “it’s the Dumbest Take in Politics”

    Who will actually fight in the next civil war? What region will separate? Whats it gonna be over? —Scott Greer @ScottMGreer And the people thinking “it’s the dumbest take in politics” are the only ones who will be surprised when it happens. Никита Когут @KogutNikita · Hey  @curtdoolittle. Can you answer this? —Никита Когут @KogutNikita

    1) As all recent revolutionary activity has shown, the Westphalian Peace is over, and we have, like the islamists, returned to ordinary war – 4GW, or war of all against all. 2) It will occur in cities – not in DC. 3) Gradual escalation of many local acts of retaliation. 4) It will be the bloodiest house-to house war in history. 5) The majority of dead will be in immigrant cities that without cash, power, telecom, heat, food, water, or public order will resort to internal predation. 6) And it will be almost impossible to stop. 7) At 90 days the government will lose legitimacy and people will take any solution offered no matter how tyrannical. 8) Given contemporary supply chains, if it continues for six months or longer, it will not be possible to recover. 9) The reason being that at this rate of monetary velocity (and debt) efficiency leaves little to no inventory in the supply chain, including the equipment to manufacture and repair the equipment. 10) It will take about 1000 people to make this happen. Not 3M. 11) In my experience,(Ukraine) it took just a few hundred men willing to fight, and the rest of the population merely served as human shields. 12) So we have the Right (middle and working class), The Left (Antifa, Academy, Media, and Urbans), and underclass (urban poor). 13) And just two cities would overwhelm national resources because no cities have the reserves to fight these emergencies. 14) The military will protect itself, and fracture along predictable lines (despite the Obama purge of the Generals) It’s not worth going into more detail, but the average idiot doesn’t study revolutions for twenty years, and go to participate in them. Nor do they understand our military cannot use combined arms in 4gw, and has been losing against 4gw over and over again. This isn’t going to be class warfare. It’s going to be politicide, that degenerates into ethnocide, that degenerates into horrors. No empire has ever survived mass migration of an underclass into its borders. Ours won’t either. No empire has ever been this fragile. Here is my advice: “REVOLUTIONS ARE ALWAYS SUSPECT IN PROSPECT BUT DETERMINISTIC IN RETROSPECT” I don’t err often. I won’t err on this subject whatsoever.

  • People Thinking “it’s the Dumbest Take in Politics”

    Who will actually fight in the next civil war? What region will separate? Whats it gonna be over? —Scott Greer @ScottMGreer And the people thinking “it’s the dumbest take in politics” are the only ones who will be surprised when it happens. Никита Когут @KogutNikita · Hey  @curtdoolittle. Can you answer this? —Никита Когут @KogutNikita

    1) As all recent revolutionary activity has shown, the Westphalian Peace is over, and we have, like the islamists, returned to ordinary war – 4GW, or war of all against all. 2) It will occur in cities – not in DC. 3) Gradual escalation of many local acts of retaliation. 4) It will be the bloodiest house-to house war in history. 5) The majority of dead will be in immigrant cities that without cash, power, telecom, heat, food, water, or public order will resort to internal predation. 6) And it will be almost impossible to stop. 7) At 90 days the government will lose legitimacy and people will take any solution offered no matter how tyrannical. 8) Given contemporary supply chains, if it continues for six months or longer, it will not be possible to recover. 9) The reason being that at this rate of monetary velocity (and debt) efficiency leaves little to no inventory in the supply chain, including the equipment to manufacture and repair the equipment. 10) It will take about 1000 people to make this happen. Not 3M. 11) In my experience,(Ukraine) it took just a few hundred men willing to fight, and the rest of the population merely served as human shields. 12) So we have the Right (middle and working class), The Left (Antifa, Academy, Media, and Urbans), and underclass (urban poor). 13) And just two cities would overwhelm national resources because no cities have the reserves to fight these emergencies. 14) The military will protect itself, and fracture along predictable lines (despite the Obama purge of the Generals) It’s not worth going into more detail, but the average idiot doesn’t study revolutions for twenty years, and go to participate in them. Nor do they understand our military cannot use combined arms in 4gw, and has been losing against 4gw over and over again. This isn’t going to be class warfare. It’s going to be politicide, that degenerates into ethnocide, that degenerates into horrors. No empire has ever survived mass migration of an underclass into its borders. Ours won’t either. No empire has ever been this fragile. Here is my advice: “REVOLUTIONS ARE ALWAYS SUSPECT IN PROSPECT BUT DETERMINISTIC IN RETROSPECT” I don’t err often. I won’t err on this subject whatsoever.