Well, judicial independence is in turn dependent upon which theory of jurisprudence, which interpretation of the constitution under it, the limits to Rights, legislation, regulation, findings (judicial discretion), which limits to interpretation of texts used. Fix 1st things 1st. If we use reciprocity (tort, trespass), strict, textual, operational construction of rights from it, strict, textual operation construction of constitution, amendments, legislation, regulation, and findings from it, then fine. That’s Rule of Law and judicial independence. But whether discretionary rule by a dictator, an oligarchy, a legislature, a bureaucracy, or a judge makes no difference. And the left has done a fine job of inserting dictators who violate that law to the bench – a fine enough job to discredit the judiciary. Our constitution was a good first draft of legal expression of the scientific evidence of the natural law of reciprocity – our customary law for millennia. But judicial independence is a consequence of that one law of reciprocity. Government is just a means of producing commons under that law. And the insurance of that law, those judges, against that government and the people who would usurp it, the only insurance possible. It’s exasperating that a hole in our constitution that neither demands ascent of the supreme court, nor demands warranty by its legislators, nor provides means of returning an undecidable case to the state, is obfuscated by discussions of independence instead. ( Apologies for letting me rant a bit on the primary subject of my work. 😉 Let’s fix the constitution with a third american revolution…. )
Form: Mini Essay
-
Judicial Independence is a Consequence of Rule of Law of Reciprocity
Well, judicial independence is in turn dependent upon which theory of jurisprudence, which interpretation of the constitution under it, the limits to Rights, legislation, regulation, findings (judicial discretion), which limits to interpretation of texts used. Fix 1st things 1st. If we use reciprocity (tort, trespass), strict, textual, operational construction of rights from it, strict, textual operation construction of constitution, amendments, legislation, regulation, and findings from it, then fine. That’s Rule of Law and judicial independence. But whether discretionary rule by a dictator, an oligarchy, a legislature, a bureaucracy, or a judge makes no difference. And the left has done a fine job of inserting dictators who violate that law to the bench – a fine enough job to discredit the judiciary. Our constitution was a good first draft of legal expression of the scientific evidence of the natural law of reciprocity – our customary law for millennia. But judicial independence is a consequence of that one law of reciprocity. Government is just a means of producing commons under that law. And the insurance of that law, those judges, against that government and the people who would usurp it, the only insurance possible. It’s exasperating that a hole in our constitution that neither demands ascent of the supreme court, nor demands warranty by its legislators, nor provides means of returning an undecidable case to the state, is obfuscated by discussions of independence instead. ( Apologies for letting me rant a bit on the primary subject of my work. 😉 Let’s fix the constitution with a third american revolution…. )
-
Uniting Conservatives with Understanding of One Another
Let’s put this in scientific prose: Conservatism is a genetic disposition evidenced in cognition, emotion, and action, of higher disgust response, higher preference for hierarchy (division of responsibility and labor), higher loyalty response. The fact that churcy christians use religion, moral christians use moralizing, educated moral christians use history, and educated moral, scientific christians use science and law is just a function of whether one is more dependent upon intuition, social interaction, or abstract reason. In other words, we are unified in our disgust response, we differ in our means of information processing, and because we differ in our means of information processing, we differ in our means of expression, advocacy ad argument. And because we are resistant to adaptation without overwhelming evidence, hypersensitive to loyalty, and hypersensitive to hierarchy, we want everyone to adopt our means of information processing and means of expression, advocacy and argument. But despite our differences in expression, what remains consistent across the faithful, the moral, the rational, and the scientific spectrum of conservatives is the natural law and the natural law’s intolerance for disgusting behavior whether intellectual, emotional, or physical, and whether in private, or the commons. If you cannot accept our cognitive tribes of conservatives as all unified under the natural law regardless of means of expressing that natural law as divine law, as moral utility, as rational practicality, and as scientific necessity, then YOU ARE THE REASON THE RIGHT FAILS. The faithful are the largest problem because they cannot tolerate their dogma as consisting only of wisdom literature (analogy and advice) rather than truth (description and decidability). Yet to win together we must deliver unto god what is god’s (faith we cannot testify to) and deliver unto caesar what is his (truth we can testify to). We cannot unite behind one paradigm of thinking, advocating, and arguing. We can only understand that we share the same instincts, wants, desires, goals for the same biological reasons regardless of their origin, and that we are right to save ourselves, our people, and humanity from disgusting thoughts, feelings and actions whether public or private. Because disgusting thoughts, feelings, and actions are imitated and spread like any disease, and man is more vulnerable to diseases of the mind than he is to those of emotions and body. We argue, and I argue, the faithful are the weakness in our civilization. It was evangelical women who brought about the chain of events that led to our current condition. It was catholic voters that brought about the leftist politicians. It was christians who gave passage to the ‘others’ who are the enemy. It is christians who idolize the enemy and its history instead of themselves and their history. So we must not argue excuses, because each conservative tribe argues with excuses within its paradigm. The only paradigm we need share is that we must eradicate what is disgusting from ourselves, our families, our polities, aour nations, and the world. And whether your god is Jehovah, Sky Father, Odin, Aristotle, the Constitution of natural law or the laws of the universe, none of them will tolerate disgust, and we will not survive without cleansing the world of it, and the universe of it afterward. We all know evil and it is disgusting and we share our disgust of thought, feeling, word, and deed. They are the disease. We are the cure. If that is not a god’s purpose for us then I know no other.
-
Uniting Conservatives with Understanding of One Another
Let’s put this in scientific prose: Conservatism is a genetic disposition evidenced in cognition, emotion, and action, of higher disgust response, higher preference for hierarchy (division of responsibility and labor), higher loyalty response. The fact that churcy christians use religion, moral christians use moralizing, educated moral christians use history, and educated moral, scientific christians use science and law is just a function of whether one is more dependent upon intuition, social interaction, or abstract reason. In other words, we are unified in our disgust response, we differ in our means of information processing, and because we differ in our means of information processing, we differ in our means of expression, advocacy ad argument. And because we are resistant to adaptation without overwhelming evidence, hypersensitive to loyalty, and hypersensitive to hierarchy, we want everyone to adopt our means of information processing and means of expression, advocacy and argument. But despite our differences in expression, what remains consistent across the faithful, the moral, the rational, and the scientific spectrum of conservatives is the natural law and the natural law’s intolerance for disgusting behavior whether intellectual, emotional, or physical, and whether in private, or the commons. If you cannot accept our cognitive tribes of conservatives as all unified under the natural law regardless of means of expressing that natural law as divine law, as moral utility, as rational practicality, and as scientific necessity, then YOU ARE THE REASON THE RIGHT FAILS. The faithful are the largest problem because they cannot tolerate their dogma as consisting only of wisdom literature (analogy and advice) rather than truth (description and decidability). Yet to win together we must deliver unto god what is god’s (faith we cannot testify to) and deliver unto caesar what is his (truth we can testify to). We cannot unite behind one paradigm of thinking, advocating, and arguing. We can only understand that we share the same instincts, wants, desires, goals for the same biological reasons regardless of their origin, and that we are right to save ourselves, our people, and humanity from disgusting thoughts, feelings and actions whether public or private. Because disgusting thoughts, feelings, and actions are imitated and spread like any disease, and man is more vulnerable to diseases of the mind than he is to those of emotions and body. We argue, and I argue, the faithful are the weakness in our civilization. It was evangelical women who brought about the chain of events that led to our current condition. It was catholic voters that brought about the leftist politicians. It was christians who gave passage to the ‘others’ who are the enemy. It is christians who idolize the enemy and its history instead of themselves and their history. So we must not argue excuses, because each conservative tribe argues with excuses within its paradigm. The only paradigm we need share is that we must eradicate what is disgusting from ourselves, our families, our polities, aour nations, and the world. And whether your god is Jehovah, Sky Father, Odin, Aristotle, the Constitution of natural law or the laws of the universe, none of them will tolerate disgust, and we will not survive without cleansing the world of it, and the universe of it afterward. We all know evil and it is disgusting and we share our disgust of thought, feeling, word, and deed. They are the disease. We are the cure. If that is not a god’s purpose for us then I know no other.
-
No More Free Markets At The Expense of Affordable Family Formation
—“This essay reminds me of the debate between charliekirk11 and Tucker Carlson about consecutives focussing on growth/free markets at the expense of things like affordable family formation.”— @Biorealism
Just to serve as resident nerd for a moment, the reason? Conservative intellectuals failed (like the church) to develop a ratio-scientific set of arguments to modernize their moral intuitions – so libertarians (economics) did – which only exacerbated the problem. The unions were a vehicle for the radical left and libertarian economic warfare against them eliminated their treat to the polity. But there was no equal vehicle for ending the academy, media, state complex. Even so, the conservatives did win the moral debate holding down the state, and would have defeated the academy and media. In the rock-paper-scissors game of ideology, reason defeats supernaturalism, but pseudoscience beats reason. Without science to defeat pseudoscience conservatives lost the argument.
[pullquote]In the rock-paper-scissors game of ideology, reason defeats supernaturalism, but pseudoscience beats reason. Without science to defeat pseudoscience conservatives lost the argument.[/pullquote]
That said, history still proved them right by the evidence, because of individualism’s destruction of the family, and economic and military relative decline as resources(revenues) were devoted to financialization, the education problem, and redistribution to underclass and bureaucracy instead of financing of the intergenerational family. Even so, without immigration the right would have been proven right. The dirty secret of western success has always been soft eugenics of the family, economy, military, and law. The problem is that the eugenics movement needed to succeed to prevent regression to the mean. And the postwar ban on the subject made conservatism impossible to advance. So while the left engages in lie-deny-pseudoscience-and incrementalism, the right engages in not telling the truth and empty moralizing. And in all things – truth rules. Until the right uses truth it cannot defeat the lie-and-deny-pseudoscience and sophism of the left. This is why democracy is not survivable. It’s suicidal.
-
No More Free Markets At The Expense of Affordable Family Formation
—“This essay reminds me of the debate between charliekirk11 and Tucker Carlson about consecutives focussing on growth/free markets at the expense of things like affordable family formation.”— @Biorealism
Just to serve as resident nerd for a moment, the reason? Conservative intellectuals failed (like the church) to develop a ratio-scientific set of arguments to modernize their moral intuitions – so libertarians (economics) did – which only exacerbated the problem. The unions were a vehicle for the radical left and libertarian economic warfare against them eliminated their treat to the polity. But there was no equal vehicle for ending the academy, media, state complex. Even so, the conservatives did win the moral debate holding down the state, and would have defeated the academy and media. In the rock-paper-scissors game of ideology, reason defeats supernaturalism, but pseudoscience beats reason. Without science to defeat pseudoscience conservatives lost the argument.
[pullquote]In the rock-paper-scissors game of ideology, reason defeats supernaturalism, but pseudoscience beats reason. Without science to defeat pseudoscience conservatives lost the argument.[/pullquote]
That said, history still proved them right by the evidence, because of individualism’s destruction of the family, and economic and military relative decline as resources(revenues) were devoted to financialization, the education problem, and redistribution to underclass and bureaucracy instead of financing of the intergenerational family. Even so, without immigration the right would have been proven right. The dirty secret of western success has always been soft eugenics of the family, economy, military, and law. The problem is that the eugenics movement needed to succeed to prevent regression to the mean. And the postwar ban on the subject made conservatism impossible to advance. So while the left engages in lie-deny-pseudoscience-and incrementalism, the right engages in not telling the truth and empty moralizing. And in all things – truth rules. Until the right uses truth it cannot defeat the lie-and-deny-pseudoscience and sophism of the left. This is why democracy is not survivable. It’s suicidal.
-
The dirty secret of western success has always been soft eugenics of the family,
The dirty secret of western success has always been soft eugenics of the family, economy, military, and law. The problem is that the eugenics movement needed to succeed to prevent regression to the mean. And the postwar ban on the subject made conservatism impossible to advance.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 13:17:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173949207486652416
Reply addressees: @Biorealism @charliekirk11 @TuckerCarlson @thespandrell @Steve_Sailer
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173948577317576704
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Biorealism @charliekirk11 @TuckerCarlson @thespandrell @Steve_Sailer … economic and military relative decline as resources devoted to financialization, the education problem, and redistribution to underclass and bureaucracy instead of financing of the intergenerational family. Even so, without immigration the right would have been proven right.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1173948577317576704
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@Biorealism @charliekirk11 @TuckerCarlson @thespandrell @Steve_Sailer … economic and military relative decline as resources devoted to financialization, the education problem, and redistribution to underclass and bureaucracy instead of financing of the intergenerational family. Even so, without immigration the right would have been proven right.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1173948577317576704
-
economic and military relative decline as resources devoted to financialization,
… economic and military relative decline as resources devoted to financialization, the education problem, and redistribution to underclass and bureaucracy instead of financing of the intergenerational family. Even so, without immigration the right would have been proven right.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 13:15:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173948577317576704
Reply addressees: @Biorealism @charliekirk11 @TuckerCarlson @thespandrell @Steve_Sailer
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173947983739654144
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Biorealism @charliekirk11 @TuckerCarlson @thespandrell @Steve_Sailer In the rock-paper-scissors game of ideology, reason defeats supernaturalism, but pseudoscience beats reason. Without science to defeat pseudoscience conservatives lost the argument. That said, history proved them right, because of individualism’s destruction of familism, and …
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1173947983739654144
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@Biorealism @charliekirk11 @TuckerCarlson @thespandrell @Steve_Sailer In the rock-paper-scissors game of ideology, reason defeats supernaturalism, but pseudoscience beats reason. Without science to defeat pseudoscience conservatives lost the argument. That said, history proved them right, because of individualism’s destruction of familism, and …
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1173947983739654144
-
The Government? It’s Weak.
—“Your little AR-15 isn’t going to do shit to protect you from the government — who has tanks and nuclear weapons. That is a pathetic fantasy.”—Matt Rogers @Politidope
Matt. What will happen to urban centers without electricity, cash machines, cash, rail, and truck transport in the depth of winter or heat of summer? What happened in Baltimore, LA, St Louis? How many days before people with AR15’s don’t have to do anything but wait? Why will police do anything under those circumstances except stay in the barracks and defend themselves and their families? What makes you think the military will do anything at all against its own people? What happened each time they have? What will foreign powers do? Our soldiers have lost every 4GW war that they’ve fought. Why do you think they won’t lose this one? How long did the government last before collapsing due to violence in the 60’s? 3 Weeks. The USA’s standing in the world is predicated on an illusion of power rapidly dispelled. You see, you think of marches in the streets. We think of the gradual sieging of population centers dependent on trade networks, power, communication, and redistribution checks. It takes 500 men to end american dominance in the world in just 90 days. And then we come for enemies. The roman empire like the american was destroyed in about seventy years, by the same people by the same method. Fool us once shame on you. We will not be fooled twice. Either we end the liberal program and fundamentalism like we did communism, or we lose 100m people. Choose. There are at least 6M men like me. There are as many as 22M. There are less than 2M active forces, of which only 200k are available, and they cannot use combined arms on populations in population centers. Only two cities, NY and DC have police forces that can hold out for 3 days So do not speak in confidence of grave matters, as if you have any idea what you speak about. You want a revolution you are probably going to get one. And everyone knows it. You know what else they know? The right wing always wins in every simulation and war game. If you think you can get rid of guns door to door why don’t you think we can get rid of every illegal immigrant, and revoke the citizenship of every immigrant legal or not back to the 1965 Hart Cellar immigration act door to door? What will you do when those men with AR15’s get $2000 per person to deliver these illegals to work and deportation camps? Why do you think it’s not possible when the chinese are doing it today. We are done with you – and you’re sitting ducks.
-
The Government? It’s Weak.
—“Your little AR-15 isn’t going to do shit to protect you from the government — who has tanks and nuclear weapons. That is a pathetic fantasy.”—Matt Rogers @Politidope
Matt. What will happen to urban centers without electricity, cash machines, cash, rail, and truck transport in the depth of winter or heat of summer? What happened in Baltimore, LA, St Louis? How many days before people with AR15’s don’t have to do anything but wait? Why will police do anything under those circumstances except stay in the barracks and defend themselves and their families? What makes you think the military will do anything at all against its own people? What happened each time they have? What will foreign powers do? Our soldiers have lost every 4GW war that they’ve fought. Why do you think they won’t lose this one? How long did the government last before collapsing due to violence in the 60’s? 3 Weeks. The USA’s standing in the world is predicated on an illusion of power rapidly dispelled. You see, you think of marches in the streets. We think of the gradual sieging of population centers dependent on trade networks, power, communication, and redistribution checks. It takes 500 men to end american dominance in the world in just 90 days. And then we come for enemies. The roman empire like the american was destroyed in about seventy years, by the same people by the same method. Fool us once shame on you. We will not be fooled twice. Either we end the liberal program and fundamentalism like we did communism, or we lose 100m people. Choose. There are at least 6M men like me. There are as many as 22M. There are less than 2M active forces, of which only 200k are available, and they cannot use combined arms on populations in population centers. Only two cities, NY and DC have police forces that can hold out for 3 days So do not speak in confidence of grave matters, as if you have any idea what you speak about. You want a revolution you are probably going to get one. And everyone knows it. You know what else they know? The right wing always wins in every simulation and war game. If you think you can get rid of guns door to door why don’t you think we can get rid of every illegal immigrant, and revoke the citizenship of every immigrant legal or not back to the 1965 Hart Cellar immigration act door to door? What will you do when those men with AR15’s get $2000 per person to deliver these illegals to work and deportation camps? Why do you think it’s not possible when the chinese are doing it today. We are done with you – and you’re sitting ducks.