Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • TRUTH BEFORE FACE (sensitive but true topic warning) (this is advanced political

    TRUTH BEFORE FACE

    (sensitive but true topic warning)

    (this is advanced political theory, read at your own risk)

    Postmodernism(Political Correctness, Denial of Cultural Racial and Class Differences) and Feminism(Denial of Gender Differences) are attempts to undermine the uniqueness of western civilization’s MALES. Males who speak Truth before Face, Truth Regardless of Status, Truth Regardless of offense; Truth regardless of the Competence Hierarchy, Truth regardless of the Dominance Hierarchy.

    The entirety of our way of life, Rule of Law, Sovereignty, Reciprocity and Jury and the reason, science, and technology that arose from it, are dependent upon the ond thing western men do that no other people do: and that is to report and report alone by speaking martial, empirical, testimonial, truth before face – anyone’s face – regardless of cost to self or others. This is the highest cost an individual can pay for his civilization. And institutionalizing it has only been done once: at the origins of western civilization, thousands of years ago.

    Why the change: women cannot bear it, that is why they are easy victims and practitioners of feminism and postmodernism. Women fight one another by undermining with words. So among women, because they have had so little time in the public sphere, truth before face has not been institutionalized. And just as women were sold christianity in the ancient world, they have been sold postmodernism and feminism in the modern world. And because they (a) spend 80% of the income (b) spend the majority of money (on unscientific non-STEM courses) in university, (c) consume 80% of tax revenues, (d) white women are the only group that defects against their males, and vote against truth before face, against meritocracy, and against defense of the commons from consumption. They have the entire Cathedral Complex (State, Academy, Media, Finance) working to cater to their denial, and doing so by degradation of men, truth before face, rule of law, and the entire western edifice that has made women’s freedom from labor and servitude possible.

    We spent millenia outlawing male anti-social behavior, but we have ceased outlawing female anti-social behavior, and face before truth, denial, and undermining are anti-social behaviors that must, like violence, be equally suppressed.

    That’s what our Natural Law did, and that’s what it must do again.

    It’s a test of Reciprocity: If men may not undermine by violence and force, women may not undermine by denial, gossiping, rallying, shaming, psychologizing, moralizing, ridiculing, and will limit themselves to truthful reciprocal speech, not disapproval and undermining as a substitute for truthful speech. If not then men will return the favor with their method of undermining, and then both genders lose.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-03 10:25:00 UTC

  • WISDOM LITERATURE GOOD AND BAD Wisdom literature is necessary. Fairy Tales, Myth

    WISDOM LITERATURE GOOD AND BAD

    Wisdom literature is necessary. Fairy Tales, Myths, Legends, all use unknown forces to educate us. That’s just different from using wisdom (advice) as truth (decidability). One cannot deduce in argument from such premises. But one can seek counsel, and give counsel with wisdom.

    It’s just a degree of precision:Analogy (wisdom) for broad, Virtues for less broad, General Rules for narrower, Law for narrower, science for narrower, and math for narrowest. This range allows us graceful increase and decrease in precision – or dishonestly, to obscure precision.

    We must only know whether we are using the sufficient degree of precision for the question, whether we lack information for, or are ignorant of, further precision, or whether we are obscuring greater precision for dishonest purposes. Theology uses all three – unfortunately.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-03 07:34:00 UTC

  • The Kremlin is far more byzantine and like the chinese communist party, far more

    The Kremlin is far more byzantine and like the chinese communist party, far more a group of powerful families. Ukrainian power is outside of the government in the 40+ oligarchs (Gangsters), and they have more money than the state (and more men and guns).

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-01 20:35:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179132674121830401

    Reply addressees: @karlbykarlsmith

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179132230632972288

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @karlbykarlsmith I don’t think any American who hasn’t lived in Kiev and talked with these people has the vaguest ideal how good the legislature and law is, but who owns the various judiciaries, and how corrupt the bureaucracy is, not because these are bad people, but because everyone is so poor.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179132230632972288

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @karlbykarlsmith I don’t think any American who hasn’t lived in Kiev and talked with these people has the vaguest ideal how good the legislature and law is, but who owns the various judiciaries, and how corrupt the bureaucracy is, not because these are bad people, but because everyone is so poor.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179132230632972288

  • NO YOU DON”T UNDERSTAND UKRAINE. (REALLY) I don’t think any American who hasn’t

    NO YOU DON”T UNDERSTAND UKRAINE. (REALLY)

    I don’t think any American who hasn’t lived in Kiev and talked with these people has the vaguest ideal how good the legislature and law is, but who owns the various judiciaries, and how corrupt the bureaucracy is, and it’s not because these are bad people, but because everyone is so poor, that it’s the only way to make a decent living: charging for government services.

    The Kremlin is far more byzantine than the Rada (parliament) and like the chinese communist party, far more a group of powerful families. Ukrainian power is outside of the government in the 40+ oligarchs (Gangsters), and they have more money than the state (and more men and guns).

    Putin could put down the Oligarchs in Russia with the Chechens, and the FSB, and so could the chinese with the red army but the conspiracy between moscow and kiev to undermine ukrainian military and bureaucracy so that they could restore the union of the two countries was so far along that once the revolution started, there is no possible way to put down the oligarchs, fight a war with russia in the east, and survive as a country without descending into internecine warfare.

    States need wealth for this reason. And every libertarian is completely unaware he’s advocating for the condition in Ukraine now and in the Pale in the past. Where do they think Rothbard, Rand and Mises got their ideas from?

    Useful idiots whether left, right, or libertarian.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-01 17:50:00 UTC

  • THE NATIONAL SOCIALISM QUESTION. IT WON THE 20TH RIGHT? I know history is curren

    THE NATIONAL SOCIALISM QUESTION. IT WON THE 20TH RIGHT?

    I know history is currently overturning the mythology but I want to address the National Socialist community for a moment, even if it’s politically incorrect for now.

    My problem with supporting the NS political program is limited to the strange german obsession with recreating a secular religion to replace the devotion of the catholic church. It’s in everything they do. It’s also why they’re the most moral people on earth most of the time.

    So this remains one of my most frustrating problems: the germans have pretty much always ‘been right’, throughout all of history. And I know why (customary law). Am I right that we must create this formal law, but that we must also produce a secular political religion on top?

    NS won the 20th right? I mean, that’s what China is practicing, and that’s what Russia wants to practice – if we’d let them. Democracy failed as always. Representative democracy failed as always. and the only decent countries are those with intact monarchies, or politicians …

    … who in practice act as monarchs rather than CEO’s. Now. I prefer a monarchy, under our traditional rule of law of sovereignty and reciprocity, with the purpose of the government the intergenerational persistence of family and nation. Where the monarchy appoints a cabinet …

    … but in english fashion, a jury of the people (or multiple houses acting as juries) approve or veto requests from the cabinet, which are all to be structured as contracts of the commons. This depoliticizes society, which has been a catastrophe for western civlization.

    There is precious little evidence that political competition does anything except undermine the nation. And by limiting people to voluntary means of cooperating, we deprive them of pursuit of rents.

    But given our historical mistake of not making the state treasury the bank of the realm, and separating credit to the people, with credit in business and industry, we allowed creation of rents against the people that belong to them in the first place, not to the finance sector.

    This problem is easily rectified.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-01 17:21:00 UTC

  • My problem with supporting the NS political program is limited to the strange ge

    My problem with supporting the NS political program is limited to the strange german obsession with recreating a secular religion to replace the devotion of the catholic church. It’s in everything they do. It’s also why they’re the most moral people on earth most of the time.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-01 17:01:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179078902746091521

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179078901676556288

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    I know history is currently overturning the mythology but I want to address the National Socialist community for a moment, even if it’s politically incorrect for now.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179078901676556288

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    I know history is currently overturning the mythology but I want to address the National Socialist community for a moment, even if it’s politically incorrect for now.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179078901676556288

  • TRAINING THE MORAL INTUITION I suppose that like many people, you assume man is

    TRAINING THE MORAL INTUITION

    I suppose that like many people, you assume man is moral, rather than amoral – merely choosing between the moral and immoral as incentives provide.

    We can in fact read others intentions and incentives. We could not cooperate on means or ends otherwise.

    However history says that such reading of intentions and incentives creates moral behavior, and trains moral intuition – not that moral behavior is intuitive. It’s not. Only reading of intentions and incentives.

    As anyone who has raised young children finds rather obvious.

    (worth repeating)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-01 15:12:00 UTC

  • ECONOMIC ADVICE AND THE PUBLIC Economics has been a cudgel for justifying a mora

    ECONOMIC ADVICE AND THE PUBLIC

    Economics has been a cudgel for justifying a moral bias, not a science to which we must conform our moral intuitions. Libertarians are largely advocating free riding on the commons just as much as socialist advocate free riding upon the private sector.

    No economic proposition is decidable by either libertarian or socialist without first solving the question of the distribution of a mixed economy, since only mixed economies can survive competition in the market for polities.

    The answer of course is just rule of law by reciprocity and that we track investments by the polity in returns and prevent the public from privatizing public gains, just as much as we prevent the public from socializing private gains.

    In other words, it’s largely a problem of record keeping and accounting.

    The problem is everyone has an interests in maintaining the lie, and maintaining chaos in the public who resorts to petty moralizing out of ignorance.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-01 13:08:00 UTC

  • IS THE STATE MORAL? —“Dear mr Doolittle, How can the state, based on extortion

    IS THE STATE MORAL?

    —“Dear mr Doolittle, How can the state, based on extortion and theft, be reciprocal? Real question. Not some goofy troll. Kind regards”— Sietze Bosman @fryskefilosoof

    The state enforces order (cooperation) sufficient to deny competitors access to the territory, resources, people, their production, and networks of productivity and trade. And to deny internal inhibitors to the income necessary to pay for it. It does this by suppressing local …

    … rent seeking, corruption, and transaction costs, and centralizing these returns as ‘taxation’, where concentration of that income can be devoted to the production of commons and the multipliers produced by such commons. this creates opportunity for centralized corruption …

    … and alliance with the state against the people, but without exception, the returns on state vs non-state are obvious: non state’s cannot and do not exist. Even those claimed by ‘libertarians’ are just borderlands defended by states or empires, investing in settlement by …

    … permissiveness we translate as liberty. Since settlers provide claims to territory which can be defended by arms, because in fact, they are investing in that territory, and reciprocity is the only international natural law that we can observe. We defend what we invest in.

    The only means of policing the state that we know of is rule of law through the courts of universal standing in matters both private and common.We have had this revoked by the state during the modern period, and we’ve been disintermediated from the courts as our means of defense.

    Democracy can never control anything other than voting an oligarchy into or out of office. Its insufficient for policy or defense because representatives are not required to state terms of contract before they enter office. So with democracy, disintermediation from the courts …

    … the only remaining method of insurance of sovereignty, liberty, freedom, and reciprocity is the militia and revolt.

    So the state must and can collect fees for defense, and the courts. It cannot compete unless it can collect fees for investment in the commons. Paying such people richly if small in number reduces their chances of corruption. But allowing them to buy votes through …

    … redistribution; and provides finance and internationals (large scale) with access to rents, rather than locals whose rents were suppressed (small scale), merely shifting the problem from many distributed rent seekers to fewer larger centralized rent seekers.

    This would appear to be a null trade, but it’s not, since suppression of local corruption and rent seeking provides the economic velocity that makes finance and internationals possible. So we must simply repeat the process of using the courts and the law to suppress …

    … new, larger organizations of rent seekers and corruption. And this process never ends. Man invents. So men will invent new means of rents and corruption, and other men will use the market for the suppression of parasitism that we call the courts and the law to stop them.

    In this sense the (positive ) market for goods, services, and information is the one we are most aware of. We are somewhat aware of the government (not state) as a market for commons. But of equal import is the (negative) market for the suppression of ir-reciprocity …

    … whether in the market for consumption (goods services information) or the market for multipliers (commons) we call government. Technically speaking the ‘state’ consists of the assets of the polity and the law its regulator, and the government a means of producing commons.

    Where commons includes the state and its holdings and the means of defense whether military, judicial or sheriff.

    Collectively the government and the state also provide the services of an insurer of last resort. The problem is maintaining its role as insurer, investor, …

    … and resolver of disputes, while not allowing the public to demand redistributions that limit their responsibility rather than insurance that retains it.

    I hope that is enough of a picture for you. No you can’t live statelessly except in a desert, tundra, or artic waste.

    That’s why no one has or does.

    I suppose that like many people who can consume information for entertainment and status you assume man is moral, rather than amoral, and choosing the moral and immoral as incentives provide. We can in fact read others. However history says that reading creates moral behavior …

    … not that moral behavior is intuitive. As anyone who has raised children finds rather obvious.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-01 10:43:00 UTC

  • REDUCING THE CANNON OF THE WEST TO A BIBLE The west never had a bible, but a can

    REDUCING THE CANNON OF THE WEST TO A BIBLE

    The west never had a bible, but a canon, and that canon was written in multiple frames although primarily scientific, legal, philosophical, normative, literary, and theological.

    While we traditional had rule of law beyond which no leader may tread, we allowed liberalism (even classical liberalism) to violate that traditional law.

    Philosophy theology tradition are just narratives that explain a group strategy in a grammar of wishes.

    Law is the evidence of what actually occurs, not what is wished for.

    Our Founding Fathers, through generations of the english civil wars, sought to reduce that canon to constitution.

    But they lacked the skill we developed in the 20th because of programming, the sciences, and the collapse of the philosophical program (yes).

    They were successful despite those weaknesses as long as the heroic narrative of the revolution persisted, or what the founders said was dependent upon the moral teachings of the church.

    The failure of the church to reform in the face of Darwin and the sciences, the replacement of the church with the academy, the capture of the academy by the immoral left, combined with Anti-whiteness, under guise of privilege, colonialism, and slavery (not unique to whites at all) provided the means of undermining that narrative, and

    So we must complete the greco-roman-germanic-anglo-american research program and produce that bible in the form of a constitution such that no narrative can undermine it, without causing our retaliation.

    We need to create the white law – a rational, scientific, western competitor to jewish law and muslim sharia. A strict construction from our founding differences: sovereignty and reciprocity, truth and duty, judge and jury, heroism and excellence, family and commons, and the market for voluntary cooperation in all walks of life – that together produce the *social political and economic order most rapidly open to adaptation and innovation*.

    We need a constitution and a law closed to interpretation open to innovation, but beyond which no man, private, public, or foreign may tread.

    Heroism and excellence, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, and Duty, Judge and Jury, and markets in all aspects of life: association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, polities, and war.

    That is the secret to western civilization. Sovereignty.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-30 18:37:00 UTC