Form: Mini Essay

  • THE ECONOMICS OF FEMALE MATE SELECTION Women voluntarily pair with men, (a) to d

    THE ECONOMICS OF FEMALE MATE SELECTION

    Women voluntarily pair with men, (a) to defend against involuntary pairing with other men; (b)to gain access to resource and defense, (c) status (market value) largely among women, (d) to capture genes, attention and resources and keep them away from other women, (e) mates will sacrifice more than all other combined except mothers for children (ie: friendship), (f) cooperation is disproportionately more productive than all other individual actions.

    This produces the emotional reaction of friendship: ready access to attention and care. Our emotions evolved to inform us that these are the optimum actions.

    Marriage is only an optimum under property. As we can see reversing in modernity. Successful people with assets stay together. Poor without them far less so. I can explain that also but it’s not very ‘nice’.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-14 10:12:00 UTC

  • No The Problem Isn’t Race. It’s Demographics (Class) (In Arabic)

    1. هل يمكن لذوي الذكاء المنخفض مثل العرب أن يتفوقوا على الأوروبيين معنويا وعسكريا ودبلوماسيا وقانونيا واقتصاديا؟ من الخطأ دائمًا قول هذا. الذكاء البشري يختلف عن القوة. بعض قوي بعض أضعف ، وبعض ذكي ، وبعض غير ذكي. بغض النظر عن عدد الرجال ، رجل واحد سيكون دائما أكثر ذكاء ، وذكاء رجل واحد أكثر ميزة من قوة رجل واحد. إن المشكلة بالنسبة للعرب ، مثل إفريقيا ، مثل الهند ، مثل أمريكا الجنوبية ، هي أكبر من عدد الأشخاص الموجودين في القاع ، وهي أكبر بكثير من أعداد الأشخاص الموجودين في القمة. هذا هو كل شيء يعني الذكاء. يجب أن يكون الرقم أعلى حتى تكون الحقيقة وسيادة القانون ممكنة بدون فساد. ويجب أن يكون أعلى بالنسبة للناس لإنتاج السلع التي يمكن بيعها في الأسواق العالمية. ويجب أن يكون أعلى لتنظيم الناس عن طريق الحوافز التجارية بدلا من القواعد والأوامر. أي شخص يستخدم قانون P لدينا ، ويبطئ تكاثر الأشخاص السفليين ، سيصبح مثل الأوروبيين في 100 – 150 عامًا. هذا هو وقت قصير جدا لتغيير الحضارة. الديمقراطية لا تستطيع أن تفعل هذا. يمكن للملوك أو الجنرالات فقط القيام بذلك. لأن الفقراء يريدون الترفيه عن طريق الجسم (بسيط) والأثرياء يريدون الترفيه للعقل (معقد). هذه هي المشكلة. المساواة ، على امتداد فترات زمنية طويلة ، مدمرة. هذا هو الدرس المؤلم للمسيحية والإسلام ، والهندوستان ، والصين. ما نريده ليس جيدًا بالنسبة لنا. نريد المخدرات والكحول والدعارة والقتل والسرقة والغش والكذب ، لذلك نعتقد أننا متوسطون وليس القاع. بدلاً من ذلك ، يجب أن نختار الطريق الوسط بين ما نريد ، وما هو جيد بالنسبة لنا ، والسماح لنا بالوقت للقيام بذلك. آمل أن يكون هذا مفيدا.

    ENGLISH QUESTION: Can low-IQ people like Arabs be able to outperform Europeans morally, militarily, diplomatically, legally and economically?ANSWER: It is always a mistake to say this. Human intelligence is more different than strength. Some strong some weaker, Some smart, Some not smart. No matter how many men, one man will always be smarter, and one man’s intelligence more an advantage than one man’s strength. The problem for Arabs, like Africa, like India, like South America, is than the number of people in the bottom, are too many for the number of the people at the top. This is all IQ means. The number must be higher for truth and rule of law to be possible without corruption. And it must be higher for people to produce goods that can be sold on world markets. And it must be higher to organize the people by commercial incentives instead of rules and commands. Any people that uses our P-law, and slows the reproduction of the bottom people, will become like europeans in 100 – 150 years. This is a very short time to change a civilization. Democracy cannot do this. Only kings or generals can do this. Because the poor want entertainment by the body (simple) and the wealthy want entertainment of the mind (complicated). This is the problem. Equality, over long time spans, is destructive. This is the painful lesson of christianity and islam, and Hindustan, and China. What we want is not good for us. We want drugs, alcohol, prostitution, to murder, to steal, to cheat, to lie, so believe we are average rather than the bottom. Instead, we must choose the middle road between what we want, and what is good for us, and let time do it’s work on us. I hope this is helpful.

  • No The Problem Isn’t Race. It’s Demographics (Class) (In Arabic)

    1. هل يمكن لذوي الذكاء المنخفض مثل العرب أن يتفوقوا على الأوروبيين معنويا وعسكريا ودبلوماسيا وقانونيا واقتصاديا؟ من الخطأ دائمًا قول هذا. الذكاء البشري يختلف عن القوة. بعض قوي بعض أضعف ، وبعض ذكي ، وبعض غير ذكي. بغض النظر عن عدد الرجال ، رجل واحد سيكون دائما أكثر ذكاء ، وذكاء رجل واحد أكثر ميزة من قوة رجل واحد. إن المشكلة بالنسبة للعرب ، مثل إفريقيا ، مثل الهند ، مثل أمريكا الجنوبية ، هي أكبر من عدد الأشخاص الموجودين في القاع ، وهي أكبر بكثير من أعداد الأشخاص الموجودين في القمة. هذا هو كل شيء يعني الذكاء. يجب أن يكون الرقم أعلى حتى تكون الحقيقة وسيادة القانون ممكنة بدون فساد. ويجب أن يكون أعلى بالنسبة للناس لإنتاج السلع التي يمكن بيعها في الأسواق العالمية. ويجب أن يكون أعلى لتنظيم الناس عن طريق الحوافز التجارية بدلا من القواعد والأوامر. أي شخص يستخدم قانون P لدينا ، ويبطئ تكاثر الأشخاص السفليين ، سيصبح مثل الأوروبيين في 100 – 150 عامًا. هذا هو وقت قصير جدا لتغيير الحضارة. الديمقراطية لا تستطيع أن تفعل هذا. يمكن للملوك أو الجنرالات فقط القيام بذلك. لأن الفقراء يريدون الترفيه عن طريق الجسم (بسيط) والأثرياء يريدون الترفيه للعقل (معقد). هذه هي المشكلة. المساواة ، على امتداد فترات زمنية طويلة ، مدمرة. هذا هو الدرس المؤلم للمسيحية والإسلام ، والهندوستان ، والصين. ما نريده ليس جيدًا بالنسبة لنا. نريد المخدرات والكحول والدعارة والقتل والسرقة والغش والكذب ، لذلك نعتقد أننا متوسطون وليس القاع. بدلاً من ذلك ، يجب أن نختار الطريق الوسط بين ما نريد ، وما هو جيد بالنسبة لنا ، والسماح لنا بالوقت للقيام بذلك. آمل أن يكون هذا مفيدا.

    ENGLISH QUESTION: Can low-IQ people like Arabs be able to outperform Europeans morally, militarily, diplomatically, legally and economically?ANSWER: It is always a mistake to say this. Human intelligence is more different than strength. Some strong some weaker, Some smart, Some not smart. No matter how many men, one man will always be smarter, and one man’s intelligence more an advantage than one man’s strength. The problem for Arabs, like Africa, like India, like South America, is than the number of people in the bottom, are too many for the number of the people at the top. This is all IQ means. The number must be higher for truth and rule of law to be possible without corruption. And it must be higher for people to produce goods that can be sold on world markets. And it must be higher to organize the people by commercial incentives instead of rules and commands. Any people that uses our P-law, and slows the reproduction of the bottom people, will become like europeans in 100 – 150 years. This is a very short time to change a civilization. Democracy cannot do this. Only kings or generals can do this. Because the poor want entertainment by the body (simple) and the wealthy want entertainment of the mind (complicated). This is the problem. Equality, over long time spans, is destructive. This is the painful lesson of christianity and islam, and Hindustan, and China. What we want is not good for us. We want drugs, alcohol, prostitution, to murder, to steal, to cheat, to lie, so believe we are average rather than the bottom. Instead, we must choose the middle road between what we want, and what is good for us, and let time do it’s work on us. I hope this is helpful.

  • UN-IDENTICAL BUT COMPATIBLE: RELIGION AND NATURAL LAW by Martin Štěpán If your f

    UN-IDENTICAL BUT COMPATIBLE: RELIGION AND NATURAL LAW

    by Martin Štěpán

    If your faith helps you behave according to natural law, whether your pantheon is Zeus/Jupiter and his family or Odin/Wodan and the Æsir or the Trinity, Mary and the saints, I will absolutely support it.

    But I’m unable to believe it even if I wanted to. Those of us significantly higher in systematizing than empathizing hardly ever can. But I can believe in natural law in itself because I see evidence of it all around me. That’s what I attribute all the beauty of creation to.

    And we both agree that our actions in this life will have consequences in the next. For believers, it might be the afterlife or reincarnation, for me, it will be the lives of my descendants, whereas I would consider each of my children half myself.

    Whichever you believe, or even if you believe neither, rule of law will incentivize the same behavior even without belief by ensuring that breaking the law won’t have consequences only in the next life but also in this one.

    Even the most extreme nihilists believe in pain. And it is the only way we can prevent ourselves from being the cause our end times and push them to the physical limits of our Universe.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-13 10:34:00 UTC

  • WESTERN MAN’S UNIQUENESS IN PURPOSE: RAISED TO RULE Let me put it in perspective

    WESTERN MAN’S UNIQUENESS IN PURPOSE: RAISED TO RULE

    Let me put it in perspective, white people, our fairy tales, our myths, our religion, our education – we were brought up to rule. Ourselves, our families, our polities, our nations and the world. This is what the rest of the world cannot grasp, and what the underclasses cannot achieve. Our civilization evolved for the continuous production of agency – we were all brought up to be princes and princesses – to rule. An aristocracy of everyone capable of joining the aristocracy. and the paternal rule of those who are not.

    I have been complaining about the anglo seizure of power by the middle class, and the american attempt to create an aristocracy of everyone. But the western man has been trying to create an aristocracy of everyone since we first put horse to wheel.

    The problem is that loosened the requirements for the demonstration of agency – one’s ability to rule one’s self ,one’s family, on’s business, one’s polity, one’s nation.

    And we failed to create additional houses for the classes that did demonstrate ability as they evolved education and limited agency.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-12 21:02:00 UTC

  • THE SUBVERSIVNESS OF THE LIE OF EQUALITY by Bill Joslin (See what happens when w

    THE SUBVERSIVNESS OF THE LIE OF EQUALITY

    by Bill Joslin

    (See what happens when we get bill in the game too???)

    Equivocation of equality as categorical membership with qualitative assessment ( that being the notion that all are equally valuable), results in an obscurity of ingroup distinction i.e. leads to the notion of open borders and franchise for all.

    We are equally members of the ingroup (categorical membership) or equally not (not a member of the ingroup)… conflation of “all men are created equally before god” with categorical membership obscures ingroup criteria and disarms any categorical assessment (that dude over in Nigeria was “created equal before god” and thus must be part of our group).

    this obscures calculation of membership benefit. specifically this stands as an example of creating AMBIGUITY. What is it that our group does? DISAMBIGUATE.

    Isonomy and categorical membership as the foundation for the notion of equally DISAMBIGUATES allowing for calculation of membership benefit and policing.

    Qualitative assessment as the foundation for the notion of equality affords obscurity in deciding membership benefit and policing…. which is why, after 100 years of the romantic notions (romantic r@pe of enlightenment ideas) we now have outgroups being extended ingroup benefit while skirting ingroup accountability.

    Truth is, notions such as equality and tolerance, in their initial application, remain critical to creating the world we would like see manifest.

    However, romantic age manipulations of these terms paved the way for the left to use our innovations against us, and the further regions of the right to rejects core mechanisms of what made the west great.

    Gotta admit – our enemies (broadly speaking – platonists) are fucking brilliant, which is why we must be more vigilant.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-12 20:09:00 UTC

  • THE INQUISITION, THE CHURCH, IN CONTEXT. The purpose of the inquisition was: …

    THE INQUISITION, THE CHURCH, IN CONTEXT.

    The purpose of the inquisition was:

    … 1) to suppress factions (heresy) that would have weakened the church’s income (they were crooks), their political power, and the church’s ambition to take over as the central government of Europe

    … 2) to standardize punishment given the wide variety of punishments coming out of various localities.

    … 3) identify and prosecute muslims and jews that had pretended to convert but not,

    … 4) and finally it evolved serve as a bludgeon to prosecute enemies during the reformation – and we see this in the witch trials which were the end process of that process combined with pre-christian heathen rituals.

    We should note that the reason the french government was so bloodily overthrown was the same reason for the protestant reformation, which was the same reason for the Cathar / Albigensian crusade arose. The corruption because of the church’s attempt to imitate Byzantium, and Byzantium’s attempt to imitate the empires of the pre-muslim world: rule of ignorant illiterate people by superstition, instead of the western model of patriarchal, continuous domestication of man from slave, to freeman, to citizen, to senate.

    The church was at a level of corruption similar to that of late french monarchy, and what we see in present Washington.

    There is little difference today between Washington DC, Versailles, The church in France, and the church in Italy (where it did succeed in rule somewhat).

    My read of the inquisition is a protestant propaganda campaign, and a more modern atheist campaign. In effect the church tried for many centuries to rule Europe as it did Byzantium and it failed. It failed and the many sovereign states succeeded. Because a monopoly calcifies and feeds corruption and a market competes and defeats corruption.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-12 19:46:00 UTC

  • THE MEANING OF ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUAL ”…Created equal …” is an incomplet

    THE MEANING OF ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUAL

    ”…Created equal …” is an incomplete sentence. In P this would have to be a complete sentence. “…. are created by nature, equal before the laws of nature and the natural law of reciprocity.” It’s just poetic. And they use property or tort rather than reciprocity.

    ” … associated …” doesn’t mean anything. I can gossip and spread a rumor about you, and cause people to associate you with something negative.

    “… aristocracy..” meant and means rule by the best, in other words, meritocracy, demonstrated by military defense, achievement of wealth, and contribution to the political government of the polity.

    Truth will bring meritocracy. If we produce families producing consistent meritocracy over generations we will produce nobility. If we produce a government by people from that nobility, we will produce an aristocracy. If that hierarchy of merit is defended by rule of law by sovereignty and reciprocity, by universal standing in matters of the commons, then it is very hard for aristocracy to survive without in fact surviving on meritocracy.

    Same goes for entrepreneurs today. The problem was removing the requirement that one demonstrate meritocracy in order to participate in government., We call this error the universal franchise. But that was a mistake. Furthermore, instead of the aristocracy producing policy and the government acting as a jury, and the bureaucracy enforcing it, we gave the decision to the government and removed the veto of the aristocracy.

    That’s the problem.

    Demonstrated excellence is the only test of merit.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-12 11:23:00 UTC

  • JOHN MARK EXPLAINS MY POSITION ON CHRISTIANITY (core)(important) To John’s Thoug

    JOHN MARK EXPLAINS MY POSITION ON CHRISTIANITY

    (core)(important)

    To John’s Thoughts, I’ll add this:

    1. SUPPRESSION OF FALSEHOOD AND ITS CONSEQUENCES – My work has a nearly single minded objective, and that ending lying in public speech. So, I’m not complaining about just christianity, but the falsehoods by which the abrahamic religions are constructed, the means of conveying those falsehoods, the consequences of teaching christians how to lie using the abrahamic method, and the consequences of christians lying using the abrahamic method, that makes the entire polity vulnerable to marxist, feminine, postmodern pseudoscience, sophism and denial, just as christianity judaism and islam were spread by supernaturalism, sophism, and denial of reality. As such my objective is the opposite of Augustine and Aquinas, which is to integrate greek reason into christianity on supernatural terms, and instead integrate christianity into western science and reason on scientific terms.

    2. A POLITICAL RELIGION – Christianity, when expressed in secular scientific terms, is in fact an optimum SOCIAL and adequate PERSONAL religion even if it is not an optimum POLITICAL religion -which is why it failed to achieve what islam and judaism did, and why it has declined rapidly in the modern era. My goal is to license political religion so that we cannot be undermined again.

    2. RESTORING A STATE RELIGION TO EXLUDE OTHERS – I’m trying to discover a way to make christianity a state religion by converting it to secular terms – this is possible because christianity and only christianity among the abrahamic religions is compatible with natural law. Christians despise the fact that the lessons of christianity in scientific terms, are optimum strategies for social cooperation at least at interpersonal scale. Because the magic and ‘woo woo’ is lost by doing so restoring dependence upon reason, instead of allowing us to fall into pacifist intuition where we can abandon reason. (which is why religions work to sedate humans.) So over the long term I work to produce a christian law that is inviolate, like sharia, so to speak, from the natural law, and the christian extension of the natural law, by the exhaustion of forgiveness before retaliation or prosecution.

    3. RESTORING THE BALANCE OF POWERS – If I can convert Christianity to secular terms I can restore the church as the political agency responsible for the individual and family, limiting the government to the material, and restore competition between family-church and commerce-government, and military-state. It is this division and competition i’m seeking to restore. (I don’t tell you these things because they taint the audience by letting them know my purposes. I only explain afterward, so that my attacks on any given subject make sense in retrospect. In other words, I’m a scientist. I run tests. The public willing to engage in intellectually honest discourse serves as my testing laboratory.)

    4. MULTIPLE CLASSES MULTIPLE RELIGIONS, SAME MESSAGE – All religions are class religions. Westerners practice a personal religion of Jesus (lower), a social religion of christianity (middle), an secular religion of philosophy (upper middle), a political religion of the law and the sciences that extend the law (upper). The Chinese have confucianism, the Dao, and buddhism, nationalism and familialism. Every culture other than judaism and islam have class religions. And we have and need our class religions.

    5. MULTIPLE GENDERS: ADD MASCULINITY TO RELIGION – There are those of us for whom the philosophy of secular christianity – it’s cooperation – is merely valuable, but for whom our ancestors, culture, nation, civilization are more precious than the false promise of an evil semitic god. And so if we categorize heathenry as the thanks to nature not denial of it, and paganism as thanks to heroes of our history, and the archetypes that are non-submissive to nature and heroic in achievement rather than heroic in tolerance. So I am continuing my process of investigation into whether it is possible to unite these scientific, natural, and christian, traditions in a constitution, that prohibits competition by which to undermine them. And whether they can be practiced together or separately. So again, I see myself trying to unite western civilization against further destruction. And I am doing so by the same means as did those great men who came before me, in every great time of change.

    THE METHOD TO THE APPARENT MADNESS

    There is a deep method to the appearance of my madness. Do not assume you grasp what I am doing. Much of what I do requires I maintain your ignorance of what I am doing, in order to ensure I collect quality information from the population. This is how all behavioral science must be conducted. And it’s how I conduct it.

    – CurtUpdated Oct 12, 2019, 11:12 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-12 11:12:00 UTC

  • MY POSITION ON CHRISTIANITY (core)(important) To John’s explanation, I’ll add th

    MY POSITION ON CHRISTIANITY

    (core)(important)

    To John’s explanation, I’ll add this:

    1. SUPPRESSION OF FALSEHOOD AND ITS CONSEQUENCES – My work has a nearly single minded objective, and that ending lying in public speech. So, I’m not complaining about just christianity, but the falsehoods by which the abrahamic religions are constructed, the means of conveying those falsehoods, the consequences of teaching christians how to lie using the abrahamic method, and the consequences of christians lying using the abrahamic method, that makes the entire polity vulnerable to marxist, feminine, postmodern pseudoscience, sophism and denial, just as christianity judaism and islam were spread by supernaturalism, sophism, and denial of reality. As such my objective is the opposite of Augustine and Aquinas, which is to integrate greek reason into christianity on supernatural terms, and instead integrate christianity into western science and reason on scientific terms.

    2. A POLITICAL RELIGION – Christianity, when expressed in secular scientific terms, is in fact an optimum SOCIAL and adequate PERSONAL religion even if it is not an optimum POLITICAL religion -which is why it failed to achieve what islam and judaism did, and why it has declined rapidly in the modern era. My goal is to license political religion so that we cannot be undermined again.

    2. RESTORING A STATE RELIGION TO EXLUDE OTHERS – I’m trying to discover a way to make christianity a state religion by converting it to secular terms – this is possible because christianity and only christianity among the abrahamic religions is compatible with natural law. Christians despise the fact that the lessons of christianity in scientific terms, are optimum strategies for social cooperation at least at interpersonal scale. Because the magic and ‘woo woo’ is lost by doing so restoring dependence upon reason, instead of allowing us to fall into pacifist intuition where we can abandon reason. (which is why religions work to sedate humans.) So over the long term I work to produce a christian law that is inviolate, like sharia, so to speak, from the natural law, and the christian extension of the natural law, by the exhaustion of forgiveness before retaliation or prosecution.

    3. RESTORING THE BALANCE OF POWERS – If I can convert Christianity to secular terms I can restore the church as the political agency responsible for the individual and family, limiting the government to the material, and restore competition between family-church and commerce-government, and military-state. It is this division and competition i’m seeking to restore. (I don’t tell you these things because they taint the audience by letting them know my purposes. I only explain afterward, so that my attacks on any given subject make sense in retrospect. In other words, I’m a scientist. I run tests. The public willing to engage in intellectually honest discourse serves as my testing laboratory.)

    4. MULTIPLE CLASSES MULTIPLE RELIGIONS, SAME MESSAGE – All religions are class religions. Westerners practice a personal religion of Jesus (lower), a social religion of christianity (middle), an secular religion of philosophy (upper middle), a political religion of the law and the sciences that extend the law (upper). The Chinese have confucianism, the Dao, and buddhism, nationalism and familialism. Every culture other than judaism and islam have class religions. And we have and need our class religions.

    5. MULTIPLE GENDERS: ADD MASCULINITY TO RELIGION – There are those of us for whom the philosophy of secular christianity – it’s cooperation – is merely valuable, but for whom our ancestors, culture, nation, civilization are more precious than the false promise of an evil semitic god. And so if we categorize heathenry as the thanks to nature not denial of it, and paganism as thanks to heroes of our history, and the archetypes that are non-submissive to nature and heroic in achievement rather than heroic in tolerance. So I am continuing my process of investigation into whether it is possible to unite these scientific, natural, and christian, traditions in a constitution, that prohibits competition by which to undermine them. And whether they can be practiced together or separately. So again, I see myself trying to unite western civilization against further destruction. And I am doing so by the same means as did those great men who came before me, in every great time of change.

    There is a deep method to the appearance of my madness. Do not assume you grasp what I am doing. Much of what I do requires I maintain your ignorance of what I am doing, in order to ensure I collect quality information from the population. This is how all behavioral science must be conducted. And it’s how I conduct it.

    – Curt


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-12 11:12:00 UTC