Form: Mini Essay

  • WHY NIRVANA “WORKED”. 😉 Well, yes. Fleetwood mac pioneered “recording loud” Pun

    WHY NIRVANA “WORKED”. 😉
    Well, yes. Fleetwood mac pioneered “recording loud” Punk added the “loud-soft-loud” strategy. Nirvana applied this strategy to the entire composition using the combination:
    Loud-Soft (composition)
    Distortion-Clear (guitars)
    Melody Following – Melody contasting (drums)
    Simple Melodies in Minor Keys (angst, vocals)
    Melodic Variation particularly in choruses (vocals)
    Vocal Range and Texture (vocals)
    Lyrics with beats matching the melody

    If you interpret this as contrasts that cause both consistency (lyrics, melody) and novelty (varying everything else) you end up with what is effectively ‘interesting’ and not ‘boring’ pop music for grownups. ;).

    I won’t go into how beethoven did this in his era with his tools but the same thing occurs: evolution of complexity using some foundation for consistency.

    Cheers
    CD

    Reply addressees: @StevePender


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-12 01:17:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1867015812009299971

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1867008253902618719

  • Q: CURT: –“Why aren’t you more bullish on china?”– I might be bullish on the c

    Q: CURT: –“Why aren’t you more bullish on china?”–

    I might be bullish on the chinese population, but IQ is a resource that requires institutions to express. The CCP like the Russian elites are prohibitive institutions, and both countries are astoundingly poor outside of ‘Potemkin Cities” because of it.

    I was optimistic for both as they pursued market economies, but the competition by the rising productive classes was a threat to the rent seeking of the established elites in russia and ‘princes’ in china.

    The forgiving interpretation is that both are empires with productive cores, but ruling over vastly unproductive territories vulnerable to central asian hordes (now islam) and that they correctly need to maintain control to prevent the spread of bad ideas, bad culture, and bad genes, as well as the rise of competitors who like their ancestors will resort to raiding and war to compensate for the incapacity of their land to produce incomes.

    The world has not come around yet to the obvious conclusion that there is only one bad actor on the planet – that is islam. The rest of the planet is maturing into modernity a bit painfully but rather rapidly and to its benefit. Were it not for oil under the middle east the remaining civilizations would all treat islam as a belligerent africa to be contained. The benefit of non-muslim africa is that it’s actually doing just fine. Islam is not.

    Cheers
    CD


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-11 17:21:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866896126236073984

  • Q: –“Do you think legal euthanasia would help things politically?”– The instit

    Q: –“Do you think legal euthanasia would help things politically?”–

    The institute’s position is that suicide is acceptable – and unpreventable. Producing goods (drugs) or using existing weapons to facilitate suicide is acceptable.
    However, engaging others in the process is not because doing so is unwarrantable because it’s epistemically impossible to know, irreversible, and therefore unrestitutable.
    Conversely for a number of reasons people do not want to die alone, do not want their passing to be unappreciated or unnoticed and later discovered by accident – and therefore want psychological ‘closure’ by some sort of process or ritual.
    Our primary concern is “the slippery slope” and as such any expansion of euthanasia must include prohibition on promotion, advisement, or suggestion of such to any individual directly or indirectly.

    EUTHANASIA GOODS AND BADS

    There is no clear consensus on the consequences of liberalizing euthanasia licensing, as opinions and research findings vary significantly. Here’s an overview of the debate:

    Good Consequences:

    Autonomy and Dignity: Advocates argue that liberalizing euthanasia allows individuals the right to choose how and when they die, particularly in cases of terminal illness or unbearable suffering. This can be seen as enhancing personal autonomy and dignity at the end of life.

    Reduction in Suffering: For those with incurable conditions causing immense pain or loss of quality of life, euthanasia can be considered a compassionate option to alleviate suffering.

    Relief for Families: It can provide emotional and sometimes financial relief for families who might otherwise bear the burden of prolonged, expensive care for a loved one with no hope of recovery.

    Bad Consequences:

    Slippery Slope Concerns: Critics fear that legalizing euthanasia could lead to broader applications beyond the originally intended scope, potentially including those with disabilities or mental health issues, not just terminally ill patients. This could result in a devaluation of life and pressure on vulnerable groups to choose death.

    Normalization of Suicide: There is evidence suggesting that legalizing euthanasia might increase general suicide rates, as it could normalize the act of ending one’s life, potentially influencing those who are vulnerable to suicide.

    Ethical and Medical Dilemmas: The practice challenges the medical profession’s ethical stance of “first, do no harm,” potentially altering the nature of doctor-patient relationships and the fundamental principles of medical care.

    Economic Pressures: There are concerns that in an aging society with rising healthcare costs, euthanasia might be seen as a cost-saving measure rather than a compassionate choice, leading to decisions influenced more by economic considerations than by patient welfare.

    Regulation and Oversight: Even with regulations, there’s a risk that the criteria for euthanasia might not be strictly adhered to, leading to cases where individuals who might not fully qualify or understand the implications are granted euthanasia.

    As for politically I’d rather not go into that here other than to say that the obvious is true, that some people require attention and support and others don’t. And as such there is both a sexual and therefore a political bias in performance of the act.

    CD


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-09 17:49:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866178290299654150

  • A NARRATIVE UNIFYING EXISTENCE, CAUSALITY, AND TIME FROM FIRST PRINCIPLES We beg

    A NARRATIVE UNIFYING EXISTENCE, CAUSALITY, AND TIME FROM FIRST PRINCIPLES

    We begin with the presumption that existence emerges from an underlying quantum substrate: a landscape of virtual fields, fluctuations, and probabilistic events. The only starting conditions are relations—patterns of correlation and interaction that never exist in isolation but always in reference to something else. These relationships, by necessity, give rise to constraints and symmetries. Over time, constraints stabilize certain states, channeling random flux into increasingly persistent structures. In a world of fields and forces, stability results from equilibrium: the achievement of a low-energy configuration that resists immediate dissolution. Thus, from relations comes the necessity of stable relations—patterns that persist, replicate, and become scaffolds for further organization.

    Stability is never absolute; it is a provisional alignment of states under given conditions. With each interaction, energy redistributes. Sometimes the reconfiguration leads to lasting bonds, sometimes to ephemeral collisions. The causal tapestry of existence is woven from these local events scaling upward: interactions accumulate into ensembles, forming particles, atoms, molecules, and, in time, complex assemblies of interdependent structures. As scales increase, complexity emerges. This progression is no accident but a filtering process: only certain configurations endure in the relentless press of entropic dissolution. The improbable assemblies that resist entropy’s pull gain a foothold, channeling energy with ever more refined efficiency and mutual benefit.

    Aphorism: Stability emerges from cascades of favorable relations that resist their own unmaking.

    Within this relentless interplay, symmetry and conservation laws enforce limits on what configurations can form. Determinism in the classical sense yields to statistical patterns at the quantum level; nonetheless, on average, certain causal chains repeatedly succeed. Thus, over cosmic timescales, gravitational wells accumulate energy density, forging stars. Stars concentrate energy flow, enabling complex chemistry in their orbiting shells. Eventually, planetary environments harbor organized biochemistry. Life arises: a negentropic engine that draws order from chaos, fueled by energy gradients. From these gradients, organisms evolve, guided by iterative processes of variation, selection, and retention. These evolutionary computations refine the capacity of life to harness resources and navigate constraints.

    Aphorism: Life is negentropy harnessed by feedback loops that sustain and replicate the improbable.

    Over billions of years, biological organisms become hosts to emergent phenomena—minds capable of modeling their environment, forecasting outcomes, and cooperating to achieve shared goals. Social orders assemble from networks of reciprocal exchanges. The principle of reciprocity—when aligned with reliable signaling and enforcement—optimizes group survival, channeling collective energies into stable institutions. Civilizations rise and fall as tests of organizational robustness. Each civilization represents a unique solution set to the universal constraints of survival under shifting conditions. Some rely on strict hierarchies; others on distributed markets. Some reify tradition; others embrace innovation. Each system is a causal experiment in harnessing resources, securing cooperation, and propagating complexity forward in time.

    Aphorism: Reciprocity is the currency of complex cooperation, the membrane that filters unstable group structures from stable ones.

    From universal laws to historical specifics, the narrative remains the same: Relations coalesce into stable patterns that generate complexity. Complexity emerges from cumulative interactions tested by temporal pressures. Existence is a cascade of patterns sorted by trial and error, rewarded by durability and adaptability. Just as stars emerge from gravitational constraints, civilizations emerge from resource and coordination constraints, each optimizing patterns that outcompete alternatives.

    In all domains—physical, biological, social—these stable configurations refine themselves via evolutionary computation. At the atomic scale, stable nuclei are selected by nuclear forces and decay rates. At the biological scale, organisms are selected by environmental conditions. At the social scale, norms and institutions are selected by cultural and ecological pressures. Evolutionary computation is the grand integrator, a recursive engine that uses feedback from past outcomes to adjust future configurations, producing incremental improvement over time.

    Aphorism: Evolutionary computation is the universal engine, perpetually re-sculpting form from the clay of formless possibility.

    Concluding Synthesis:
    In total, existence is a recursive sorting algorithm applied to the flux of quantum possibility. Patterns stabilize, complexity builds, and from the tensions between entropy and negentropy, from the interplay of cooperation and competition, from the continuity of time and the invariance of law, emerges the grand panorama of forms. Everything reduces to iterative processes of disambiguation (resolving uncertainty into stable states), recombination (mixing components into new configurations), and adaptation (revising structures to persist in changing conditions).

    Final Aphorism:
    “Existence consists of the dance of patterns refining themselves into ever more coherent symphonies of stable relation—an endless choreography of disambiguation, recombination, and adaptation performed beneath the silent baton of time.”


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-05 23:47:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1864818905497374721

  • POSSIBLE CAUSES FOR THE PERPETUATION OF ADHD TRAITS –“Group success often depen

    POSSIBLE CAUSES FOR THE PERPETUATION OF ADHD TRAITS

    –“Group success often depends on diverse personality and cognitive types.”–

    1. Adaptive Advantages in Evolutionary Contexts

    Hyperfocus and Creativity:
    Traits associated with ADHD, such as hyperfocus during periods of intense interest, may have been advantageous for solving complex problems or innovating.
    Enhanced creativity and novel problem-solving skills would have been valuable in dynamic or changing environments.

    Exploration and Risk-Taking:
    High impulsivity and novelty-seeking behavior, common in ADHD, may have conferred survival benefits in hunter-gatherer societies:
    Foragers: Individuals prone to explore new territories, resources, or methods of survival may have benefited their groups.
    Scouts: High-risk, high-reward behaviors could have been advantageous for discovering food sources or avoiding threats.

    Rapid Response and Vigilance:
    ADHD-like traits may enhance alertness to environmental changes, benefiting individuals in roles requiring quick reactions or adaptability (e.g., during hunting or combat).

    2. Trade-Offs in Cognitive and Behavioral Traits

    Short-Term Advantages vs. Long-Term Costs:
    The impulsivity and distractibility of ADHD may lead to short-term successes in certain high-stakes or dynamic situations, offsetting the longer-term disadvantages.

    Specialization in Group Dynamics:
    In a tribal setting, individuals with ADHD-like traits may have filled unique niches, complementing those with more consistent focus and planning skills.
    Group success often depends on diverse personality and cognitive types.

    3. Balancing Selection
    Heterozygote Advantage:Genes associated with ADHD may confer advantages in heterozygous states, while homozygous expression results in more severe manifestations of the disorder.
    This dynamic maintains genetic diversity within the population.

    Environmental Dependence:
    Traits that are maladaptive in modern, sedentary, and structured societies may have been adaptive in ancestral environments.
    Selection pressures can shift, making certain traits less advantageous without entirely removing them.

    4. Gene-Pleiotropy and Overlap with Other Traits
    Shared Genetic Pathways:
    ADHD-associated genes may also influence other traits that are highly adaptive, such as intelligence, creativity, or social influence.
    For example, genes affecting dopamine signaling may enhance reward sensitivity, increasing motivation in some contexts despite leading to impulsivity in others.

    Pleiotropic Effects:
    Genes involved in ADHD may also play roles in other biological systems or behaviors, making them resistant to negative selection because they provide overall net benefits.

    5. Modern Mismatch with Evolutionary Context
    ADHD traits may have been adaptive in environments requiring high mobility, rapid adaptation, and risk-taking but are less so in modern settings that prioritize sustained attention, routine, and long-term planning.
    The rise of structured educational systems and workplace environments may have highlighted ADHD as a disorder rather than an adaptive variant.

    6. Weak Selection Pressure Against ADHD
    ADHD does not typically result in significantly reduced reproductive fitness:Many individuals with ADHD have children and pass on their genes.
    The disorder often manifests more as a variation in behavioral traits rather than as a catastrophic condition that would eliminate carriers from the gene pool.

    Examples of ADHD Traits in Historical or Evolutionary Contexts
    Explorers and Innovators: Risk-taking and novelty-seeking traits associated with ADHD likely drove exploration, discovery, and technological advances.
    Leaders in Crisis: Impulsivity and rapid decision-making may have been valuable in chaotic or high-pressure situations.
    Group Success: Diversity in cognitive styles ensured that groups could respond to a wider range of challenges and opportunities.

    Summary
    The persistence of ADHD in the population likely reflects a balance between its adaptive benefits in certain contexts and its modern disadvantages in structured, sedentary societies. ADHD traits are maintained because they provide group-level or individual-level advantages in dynamic, unpredictable environments, outweighing their costs under ancestral conditions. Natural selection operates on the totality of traits and their contributions to survival and reproduction, and ADHD traits appear to have played a meaningful role in human evolution.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-04 19:41:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1864394504389971970

  • EXPLAINING TIME AS THE POSITIONAL RATE OF CHANGE PERCEIVABLE BECAUSE OF MEMORY.

    EXPLAINING TIME AS THE POSITIONAL RATE OF CHANGE PERCEIVABLE BECAUSE OF MEMORY.
    There exists a state of, and therefore zero point of, energy in the universe. There exists a zero point of the rate of change in the universe -and therefore a zero point of time regardless of its system of measurement. There exist differences in energy density in the universe that causes a variation in the rate of change at that point in the universe. There exists a relationship between the rate of change and the slower rate of human memory formation that lets us perceive change. This is why time is experienced as constant at a position in the universe and why time is perceived as relative at different positions of the universe, while time is consistent at the zero point of change throughout the universe where the rate of change of the quantum background is not otherwise affected by the presence of density. The only thing interesting here is why density and its absence cause variation in all physical processes, and this itself appears to be caused by the maximum rate of adjustment of the quantum background as density increases. Which is, of course, eminently logical, given that all existence that persists consists of portions of the quantum background in spin, causing density and the forces that emerge from it.

    Reply addressees: @whatifalthist


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-03 14:02:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1863946819165945856

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1863752454522708135

  • WHY THE WORLD SEEMS CHAOTIC – BECAUSE YOU’RE WRONG IN UNDERSTANDING IT. Rudyard,

    WHY THE WORLD SEEMS CHAOTIC – BECAUSE YOU’RE WRONG IN UNDERSTANDING IT.
    Rudyard, (all);
    Given I work in first principles, constructive logic, and universal commensurability, of course, I see reality as obvious – and humans operating by bounded rationality, and behavior deterministic under no more than thirty or so general rules.

    The only thing I’m ever surprised by is the degree of human innovation in vanity, magical thinking, folly, ignorance, error, bias, and deceit.
    People are really, really, really good at trying to rationalize reality such that they need not conform to it.

    The human intuition is to adapt as little as possible. But to demand others adapt to us instead. That is the underlying reason for why you, and they, and almost everyone, does not grasp the simplicity of reality.

    We confuse our biases in the moral terms under which we wish to cooperate, with the amoral rules of the universe which cares not whether we do so or not.

    Chaos is the result of incommensurability.
    Incommensurability exists only because we err.
    We err to avoid adapting.
    Our instinct is moral demand to others.
    But the universe will not reciprocate.
    And humans only will when convenient.

    Life: Adapt or die
    Our Lives: Adapt or suffer not doing so.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute.

    Reply addressees: @whatifalthist


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-01 04:59:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1863085558136020992

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1862938130958987396

  • I have bought and integrated something close to a hundred companies. I’ve built

    I have bought and integrated something close to a hundred companies. I’ve built a top 25 digital agency. And I’ve spent decades of my life consulting with the executive teams of fortune four hundred companies – in particular on their strategies. It involves running dozens to hundreds of people through working sessions where I pry out of them the source of their internal conflicts, their limits, and their opportunities.
    You would be surprised how distributed decision making is in any large company,and how incompetent financial and operational leadership is at comprehending market and positioning. Chief Marketing Officers are the highest turnover in the top offices for a reason. Most of them fail.
    So yes I am ‘smarter than that’, but it means that developing consensus on branding and positioning had best be done by one of the top very expensive agencies in the world, and not by internal staff, nor production agencies, nor handed off to small ‘creative firms’ that are experts in TRENDS not BRANDS.
    All problems are people problems.

    Reply addressees: @cruel_hiraeth


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-28 20:49:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1862237335896944640

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1862203879137714280

  • I think our work on the grammars and logic is superior to traditional teachings

    I think our work on the grammars and logic is superior to traditional teachings but the result is the same.

    That leaves Arithmetic and Geometry (mathematical logic), Astronomy (physics, systems, environments), rhetoric (expression), and Music (harmony and emotion).

    I think the structure of those ancient methods was to teach thinking in patterns and scale – much different from the primitivism of earlier thought, especially the primitivism of middle eastern thought. It’s very naturalistic.

    I agree with that objective. My concern is that all of these are necessary:
    1. Physics: The question of Physics, Biology, Chemistry and Engineering a foundation.
    2. Behavior: Cognitive science, Behavioral Science, Economics, Ethics, Law, and Politics are the ‘systems’.
    3. Measurement: Arithmetic, Accounting, Mathematics, Computation (automation, simulation), and Economic thinking (supply-demand and disequilibrium) the systems of measurement.
    4. Reason and Argument: Writing, Reading, Grammar, Logic, and Rhetoric the system of expression.
    5. Execution: Task, project, and program management their means of application.

    Reply addressees: @Lord__Sousa


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-27 17:09:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1861819653900963840

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1861801648093286511

  • EXPLAINING INTEREST FREE CONSUMER CREDIT FOR DURABLE TOODS FROM THE TREASURY It’

    EXPLAINING INTEREST FREE CONSUMER CREDIT FOR DURABLE TOODS FROM THE TREASURY
    It’s not interest, its cumulative payments against income that prevent people from borrowing.
    The reason for consumer debt being interest free is that
    (a) we are borrowing from ourselves since all the credit is issued by the state and insured by the state. (b) there is no value in consumer credit and insurance given it’s the endpoint of production. The only value interest produces in an economy is regulation of production. (You might need to know a bit about econ to understand that.) (c) allowing firms to issue credit at risk to consumers allows them to seek rents against consumers at consumer risk instead of invest in returns at their own risk.
    In other words, with the invention of fiat currency (money substitutes as shares of stock in the economy) we are no longer borrowing from others income but from one another’s faith in our future.

    Reply addressees: @slenchy


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-26 19:33:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1861493574371811328

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1861491187170886090