Form: Mini Essay

  • THE REVOLUTION IN THE ANCIENT WORLD The revolution in the ancient world was demo

    THE REVOLUTION IN THE ANCIENT WORLD

    The revolution in the ancient world was democritus’ atomism, socratic skepticism (failure), platonic idealism(failure), and the success of aristotelian reason, empiricism, proto-science, stoic and epicurean replacement of conflationary religion, and roman law and administration, creating markets for all peoples – but the semites (the equivalent of ghettos) couldn’t grasp that ‘uncontrolled vision’ and sought to restore controlled (feminine) monopoly and conflation using female methods of deceit, and the female method of undermining from within.

    The revolution in the modern world starts with aesthetics in italy and makes its way into the legal minds who apply it to science producing the anglo revolution (athens). The germans(spartans) reacted by doubling down on it and becoming the worlds best materialists, and the americans inherited both civilizations for a time when the french and russians instigated the third war of german containment.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-24 11:37:00 UTC

  • ETHNOCENTRISM, SOVEREIGNTY: RULE OF LAW – ITS ENOUGH. The Via- Positiva Small, h

    ETHNOCENTRISM, SOVEREIGNTY: RULE OF LAW – ITS ENOUGH.

    The Via- Positiva

    Small, homogenous, low power distance, polities under rule of law, and their naturally limited capacity for fiat currency inflation demonstrate the optimum mixed economies for both trade and redistribution.

    The optimum organization of such a polity is by Sovereignty, Rule of law of Reciprocity, an independent cult of the judiciary, a universal militia, a standing professional army of warriors, a monarchy as a judge of last resort, houses for the classes demonstrating contribution to the commons for the production of commons. And markets in everything.

    Ethnocentrism is the optimum group strategy because kin selection favors – or at least doesn’t resist – loyalty, high trust, commons, and redistribution.

    Ethno-supremacism is a necessary property of ethnocentrism.

    Europeans are demonstrably superior genetically, culturally, scientifically, medically, technologically, institutionally, civilizationally to all other civilizations in the ancient and modern worlds.

    And we are so for one reason: sovereignty. Everything in our civilization descends from it.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-24 10:55:00 UTC

  • ABRAHAMISM AS LYING TO DISTRACT FROM EVOLUTIONARY DENIALISM by Martin Štěpán and

    ABRAHAMISM AS LYING TO DISTRACT FROM EVOLUTIONARY DENIALISM

    by Martin Štěpán and Curt Doolittle

    Stephen J Gould was posing as an evolutionary biologist where in reality, he was an evolutionary denialist.

    Liars all: Gould, Boas, Freud, Marx, Adorno-Fromm, Friedan, Derrida, Cantor-Bohr.

    These people are all evolutionary denialists. Every single one of them. That’s what separates them from the european intellectual tradition, and why they were wrong about everything.

    Why do you think they evolved at the same time as Darwin, Spencer, and Nietzsche?

    Why do you think you have control over the lies your telling now, or that any of these people had control over the lies they were telling?

    In order to prevent falsehood, we categorize lying as not trying to lie, but as not performing due diligence against lying.

    If you try to justify a prior – you’re lying. What science did these people do: Gould, Boas, Freud, Marx, Adorno-Fromm, Friedan, Derrida, Cantor-Bohr.

    The scientific method exists to stop you from a justifying a prior, a cognitive bias – or a group’s mythology.

    They didn’t do any science. They made it up.

    Abrahamism = Evolutionary Denialism.

    Why?

    Female group strategy.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-24 10:13:00 UTC

  • THE DEAL WITH THE DEVIL – FALSE MINDFULNESS “The Smith and the Devil” may be one

    THE DEAL WITH THE DEVIL – FALSE MINDFULNESS

    “The Smith and the Devil” may be one of the oldest European folk tales, with the basic plot stable throughout the Indo-European speaking world from India to Scandinavia, possibly being first told in Indo-European 6,000 years ago in the Bronze Age.

    A blacksmith strikes a deal with a malevolent supernatural being, such as the Devil, Death or a genie. The blacksmith exchanges his soul for the power to weld any materials together. He then uses this power to stick the devil to an immovable object, such as a tree, to renege on his side of the bargain.

    In Faust, the protagonist is highly successful yet dissatisfied with his life, which leads him to make a pact with the Devil at a crossroads, exchanging his soul for unlimited knowledge and worldly pleasures. Faust is irrevocably damned

    *One may not have mindfulness by making a bargain with a devil in god’s dress.*

    This basic plot is stable throughout the Indo-European speaking world, from India to Scandinavia, according to the research.

    The study said this tale could be traced back to the Proto-Indo-European society when metallurgy likely existed and there was archaeological and genetic evidence of massive territorial expansions by nomadic tribes from the Pontic steppe (the northern shores of the Black Sea) between 5,000 and 6,000 years ago.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-24 09:36:00 UTC

  • WILL AMERICAN-STYLE CAPITALISM STILL EXIST 100 YEARS FROM NOW? by Curt Doolittle

    WILL AMERICAN-STYLE CAPITALISM STILL EXIST 100 YEARS FROM NOW?

    by Curt Doolittle, Philosopher of political economy and founder of the Propertarian Institute.

    America doesn’t practice capitalism it practices rule of law, and as a consequence of rule of law, people are limited to survival in markets. Because western civilization began entrepreneurially, developed promise and contract, tort law and property, testimony and jury, we have long standing institutions for enforcing contracts, and long standing tradition of high trust. So for these reasons we could develop large scale organizations using contracts. These large scale organizations using contracts could organize a lot of money behind entrepreneurial ventures. Because of a combination of rule of law of tort, contracts, and large organizations, we could create high production capacity using high capital investment in machines, without resorting to central government control, militarizing people, serfdom or slavery to organize people into large working groups. And using this combination of law, contract, jury, large organizations, and technological innovation, we could drag humanity – resisting us, kicking and screaming – out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, child mortality, early death, tyranny, and the chaos of natural forces, at the cost of creating uncertainty. So people traded poverty and certainty for prosperity and uncertainty. And people continue to make the choice every day. The communists (jews) invented the terms capitalism as a criticism, and socialism and communism as a false promise, as a means of restoring certainty and control over their lives. But neither socialism or communism is possible because both suffer from the four big problems of lack of incentives, and therefore laziness, the inability to use prices to efficiently organize an economy, and endemic corruption by state managed industries and the government, and the tendency of the people to vote themselves or demand themselves into tragedies ofthe commons: consumption higher than production.

    What the future will bring?

    In advanced countries one child policies: Automation will continue to drive down human labor markets until only a third of people, or maybe a fifth of people, can find employment, nd those people who work will end democracy and rule the people that can’t. The end result will be eugenics that suppressed the reproduction and consumption of those people who are unable to participate in production distribution and trade. IN poor countries they will forgo automation and continue to use labor, which will produce subsistence level for the poor and a small wealthy class.

    Just Like the rest of history.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-23 20:13:00 UTC

  • WHAT DOES WHITE MEAN? (possibly controversial post warning)(This post covers gen

    WHAT DOES WHITE MEAN?

    (possibly controversial post warning)(This post covers genetic differences in neoteny, cognition and personality between geographic groups, and between the sexes. Stop reading if you are concerned you would be offended.)

    —“White means….”— Elizabeth Anonymous

    Hmmm…. I do science. I leave intellectual dishonesty for others.

    We don’t have a term for Genetic, Ethic, Europeans other than ‘White’. But “White”, meaning Ancestral Ethnic European, is easily genetically determinable. In general, at least six generations are necessary to launder ethnic outbreeding. Even, by six generations someone will still express certain dominant traits despite constraining breeding within the group. And it is still easy to determine the difference between a full Scandinavian and the same generation with an Iberian ancestor.

    Whites are the remains of the post-glacial maximum peoples, plus the early neolithic farmers, who were conquered, largely genocided and replaced by the ie’s. We are the most genetically homogenous people outside of Han-Korean-Japanese. The only open question is whether we include the remaining pre-ie Anatolian, early neolithic farmer populations of the Balkans, Greece, Southern Italy, and Sardinia in the classification ‘white’ out of cultural affinity under Christianity, or we limit ourselves to genetics using the european branch of the IE expansion: Itals (south), Germanics, Scandinavians, Baltics, Slavs, and Finnics. The rest of the Caucasians descend from the Iranic branch of the IE’s, and anatolians (Hittites), Caucasians (if they existed), and those that integrated into the Semitic peoples – are all lost to us. There were only a few post-glacial maximum west eurasian peoples, and the turks of the northern far east, are the only peoples of the post-glacial that are not indo europeans.

    Science is science. Women fear conflict. Women disapprove rather than accept an undesirable but true statement. Women will deny a truth to avoid conflict. Women will advance a falsehood to eschew conflict. While the male vs female distribution of personality Traits and Facets overlaps, the difference between the sexual (gender) relative homogeneity of traits, and the relative heterogeneity of Facets under those traits, is (a) agreeableness, (c) dominance expression, and this results in the (to females) annoying male habit of stating the truth despite the undesirability of it. It also accounts for the approximately 20% improvement in male detection of general trait expression and symmetric improvement in female detection of individual trait expression. In other words, males are more often correct in the ascertainment of empirically correct stereotypes than females, both at the perceptual-cognitive level and at the agreeability level. While women are equally superior at individual emotional empathy and incentive-sympathy.

    Net net of the science as it sits: Neoteny slows maturity and buys agency (neural formation) at the cost of emotional instability (creativity, neuroticism). This explains the high emotional instability of european women, and the nearly 1/3 of european women that experience psychological issues when not working in close association with other women to limit them. East asians are the most neotenous by far, europeans less so, africans and afro-asiatics lees so. This is why east asians, then europeans, then afrio-asiatics (semitic peoples), the africans have increasing rates of maturity at decreasing agency and verbal ability. Europeans (a) have not over-neotenized like the east asians nor under neotenized like the africans, and at the same time we have practiced cold weather eugenics for thousands of years. So between our neotenic development, our least-clannish(racist) temperament, our balance of verbal and spatial abilities, and our development of sovereignty (what we mistakenly call individualism) and the culture that resulted from it, including tripartism (markets between miltiary-judicial, producers-philosophers, and priests-theologians, we developed reason, empiricism, science, technology and medicine faster than all other peoples in the world combined.

    Ergo, unfortunately, it’s true that at last working class and upward whites are genetically and culturally superior in those ways necessary for the production of advanced and rapidly advancing civilization. And demand by women and immigrants to revert our civilization to primitive, reality-denying, maladaptive, authoritarian, non-market civilization, just proves that (a) these other peoples are unable to integrate in our civilization because they cannot compete in it, (b) our women have defected against our civilization out of fear of conflict and are assisting the destruction of our civilization – just as women and slaves undermined and brought down the roman empire using Christianity from within.

    So christianity in the ancient world with the false promise of life after death, and promise of freedom from nature’s competition by marxism, socialism, postmodernism, feminism, human-bio-diversity-denialism, and ‘silencing the truth’ in the modern world to destroy western civlization yet again.

    It’s women that need to look in the mirror. Not men.

    We have the courage to face the man in the mirror.

    Do you have the courage to face the woman in the mirror?

    That is the only test of equality of agency that matters.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-23 15:03:00 UTC

  • MOTIVATIONS FOR COLONIALIZATION by Scott De Warren If we disambiguate the medite

    MOTIVATIONS FOR COLONIALIZATION

    by Scott De Warren

    If we disambiguate the mediterranean from the northern Atlantic worlds we will find different, though related motivations for colonization.

    For the Iberian peninsula it was a matter of national survival.

    As the Atlantic opened up to the world the Netherlands, followed by England set up global trade networks (inspired by previous Portuguese and Spanish success) to build up their national wealth so as to resist Catholic domination (Netherlands eventually split) made possible by Spanish gold and silver from the colonies.

    Resisting Catholic domination required rapid expansion of mercantilist trade (raw material inputs are imported, high value added outputs are exported) making bases in North America ideal.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-23 07:34:00 UTC

  • (from twitter) Sotomayor and Ginsberg will be gone before Trump is. Hart Cellar

    (from twitter)

    Sotomayor and Ginsberg will be gone before Trump is.

    Hart Cellar was a violation of the natural law of the constitution and was the means by which the postwar jewish left succeeded in immigrating dependents where the false promises of marxism, socialism, postmodernism, feminism and denialism had failed to persuade the european people.

    The Parade of undermining western civ. with pseudoscience, sophism, and lies: Cantor, Boas, Marx, Freud, Adorno-Fromm, Derrida, Friedan, and hundreds of followers and thousands of propagandists: unwarrantable, false promise, baiting into hazard, with Pilpul, Critique and “GSRRM”.

    The Jewish century is over. The second fall of european civilization by the destruction of german and russian civilization will not be followed by anglo civilization.

    We will restore rule of law.

    And it will “happen again”

    Just as it always does.

    Because it is earned.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-22 12:32:00 UTC

  • GOOD AND EVIL IS A MIDDLE EASTERN NOT EUROPEAN CONCEPT —-“Good and evil were i

    GOOD AND EVIL IS A MIDDLE EASTERN NOT EUROPEAN CONCEPT

    —-“Good and evil were invented in the middle east to facilitate cultural warfare between the middle east and the indians. European religion used chaos and mischief vs order, and our gods were ‘real people’ with real frailties.” – Curt Doolittle

    —“The concepts “good” and “evil” are actually Indo-European in origin. Etymology dictionaries are useful. Better perhaps to say that our misconceptions about what exactly those terms mean are influenced by Middle Eastern philosophy…”—AunMarie Grooms

    Indo european a language and cultural family of genetically west eurasians of the proto-European, proto-Caucasian, proto-Iranic but NOT proto-turkic post glacial maximum peoples. The proto-caucasians and anatolians appear to have been lost to us.

    As far as I know, good and evil are indo-iranic not indo european. It’s unlikely that I err. The division between European, iranic, indo-iranic results in European (aristocratic egalitarian and martial), Persian(aristocratic authoritarian and martial), and Hindu( caste, duty-role, and ‘priestly’) pantheons.

    The argument put forth by others which I got from Karen Armstrong, was that it appears that the north and west europeans developed more so in the corded ware culture(material), and the iranics more in the vedas (spiritual), and that this is largely because etherial religion as we understand it evolved in what we call Mesopotamia-Anatolia or, more precisely, along the euphrates.

    It’s most likely that religious pantheons developed differently due to differences in indo european ethnicities, and strategies. The west pretty much killed everyone they came in contact with (or at least the males) because the neolithic farmers were not developed enough to resist them. But as the iranic people migrated east to india, then south of the caspian, then west back into Mesopotamia they encountered developed peoples that they had to conquer.

    So, iranics and indo iranics used hierarchy to rule an compete with others like the indus valley people and the Mesopotamians while europeans maintained aristocratic egalitarianism and didn’t develop authoritarianism until the late roman empire – and even then – they would have been more successful if they’d been much more authoritarian and much less tolerant.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-22 10:06:00 UTC

  • SCIENCE PRESERVING FAITH They means of preserving the faith under the science of

    SCIENCE PRESERVING FAITH

    They means of preserving the faith under the science of gods as information, is that while protocol is behavior, and the transmission between people (nodes, modules) is slow (in itself a survival technique), it is possible that the host (body of the faithful) functions as a collectively subconscious organism, and that given synchronicity, we all operate as if there were a physical connection, when in fact, the only connection is the information we are subject to by our sense, perception, auto-association. This provides a rational and scientific explanation for why religion does work despite the pantheon of grammars we express it in. It explains the value of Jesus and nature for the submissive (uncompetitive) and the traditional(dominant, competitive) european gods as dominance expression. This ends the problem of the multiplicity of conflicting gods, and the evident and undeniable failure of gods in all material things, and that god created the universe, but leaves the rest of theology intact. So this leaves us with a scientific view of every religion that does not seek to dominate any other religion, and falsifies every religion that does seek to dominate other religions. Furthermore, it explains the western pantheon of scientific, normative-legal, ideal philosophical and theological grammars as satisfying the language of each group of ‘gods’ in our pantheon. If you pray to your god, talk to your god, or think in the language of your deity, or your deism, you will participate in the construction of that ‘will’.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-21 11:45:00 UTC