(another sermon) [W]hat is man’s competitive advantage? Our body form gave us opportunity to out-maneuver all other creatures on this earth. Our bipedal body form gave us opportunity to evolve bipedal motion so that could outrun every other creature on this earth. By outrunning every other creature on this earth our hands were free to develop independently for the single purpose of manipulation. By developing the ability to manipulate objects, we could make and then carry tools, and tools improved our ability to capture resources as predators, and to increasingly specialize in predation in addition to gathering and scavenging. For reasons that appear to be an accidental adaptation to disease our brains obtain the opportunity to vastly increase in size, making it possible for increasingly sophisticated thought. For reasons we are not sure we understand at present other than the obvious utility of it, we developed speech – serialized communication – which gave us the opportunity think and speak in continuously recursive sequential fashion. For reasons that are obvious, thinking in continuously recursive sequential fashion gave us or improved our ability to proactively plan – permute sequences of future predictions – rather than just respond to impulses and opportunities – just as numbers improve our ability to compare what is beyond our senses. For reasons that are obvious, this ability to categorize organize plan using language evolve into reason. For reasons that are obvious, we developed tyranny (upper caste force monopoly for maximum rate of adaptation), the middle class majority: bureaucracy and serfdom for regularity, along with oligarchy and markets for continuous adaptation, and theocracy (lower caste resistance monopoly for resistance to adaptation). Because these are the dominant male, ascendent male, and female competitive strategies – and the only means of organizing mankind. And maximizing our ability to adapt and evolve by using aggressive transformation, persistence of state, continuous adaptation, and resistance to change (or at least demand for satisfaction and compromise in exchange for adapting) continues our strategy of maximizing our ability to outmaneuver nature, plant, beast and other groups of humans.
Form: Mini Essay
-
The First Sermon : Are You Christian as You Claim?
—“No good can come from alliance with anti-christs”—
[T]he question is whether one is “anti” Jesus’ teachings, or “anti” dogmatic text that was added to those teachings by others, or anti those who pretend to follow Jesus but don’t. We follow Jesus by action, and action alone. Whether by faith, tradition, or reason. Or we do not follow Jesus’ actions. Instead, we use the cover of faith for selfish indulgence and unchristian inaction. And your demand for obedience to YOU, to YOUR interpretation of dogmatic text, to YOUR faith in abandoning reason, rather than our faith in tradition of followers of Jesus, our imitation of Jesus, or in our reason about him, is a violation of Jesus’ teaching. It is you who are anti-christ. For you Jesus was a prophet. For some of us he was a philosopher. For others he was a law giver. For others a social scientist. Because each of us differs in how we understand the world, emotionally, rationally, practically, or empirically. And instead of intolerance of those who do not imitate jesus’ teaching of love your neighbor as you love yourself, you are intolerant of others who do not satisfy your selfish demand that others understand the world on your terms. The dogmatically faithful demonstrate loyalty to one another by loyalty to dogma so that together they create a social construction (tribe), so that together they can serve as a social and political FORCE – a resistance movement – against other tools of status signaling: power. It has absolutely nothing to do with loving thy neighbor as you would love yourself – the extension of familial love to kith and kin. It has everything to do with hatred of they neighbor for not adapting to your form of making sense of the world: your selfishness and greed. You either act as Jesus acted and asks us to act toward one another, or you are not christian. You are an activist in a political movement no different from, and no less destructive than, the cancers of judaism and Islam. It is in acting toward one another in large numbers we create the christian peoples that together raise mankind out of perpetual conflict, deceit, mistrust, and the resulting ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, child mortality early death and condition of victimhood to a nature all but hostile to our lives. You’re the unchristian anti-christ in your selfishness, greed, and arrogance – you are not the children of god – just petulant children infantilizing each other with the magical thinking of women so thoroughly that you are unable to mature fully into adult men who take material responsibility for the world – and like women you leave it up to those of us who mature into men anyway while you petulantly and arrogantly demand we service you – rather than engage like the rest of us in honest, Christian, voluntary, reciprocity – exchange – regardless of our different means of understanding the world. Many of us do not need ‘training’ like farm animals. We merely need understand that either by the evidence of tradition, and reason, that teaching people to act as did Jesus whether they learn best by ritual, parable, theology, philosophy, tradition, or science, is dependent upon how each of us best learns to regulate our behavior so that we CAN act as Jesus asked. Some of us are filled with continuous emotional sensitivity, fear, and impulses – the child and female biased mind. Some of us have none of it and worry only abut the survival of the tribe – the adult male biased mind – we are informed only by observation, evidence, and reason independent of emotion and impulse. If God made us, he made us different so that we could divide the labor of comprehending the infant, child, teen, adult, and mature, and aged, in male and female conditions, in many different environments, encountering many different challenges, so that TOGETHER we could transcend the animal and evolve into those worthy to sit beside him at his table – converting this world and all worlds in the universe into his eden. Only the infant, the child, and the insecure female mind like that of the domesticated animal herd of sheep, cow, and horse, that want us to be think and feel the same. It is the mature mind that understands that we evolve into packs, and divide the labor of sensing, perceiving, understanding, choosing, negotiating for, coopering on, and completing the tasks of our ascent into godhood, generation by generation, by our differences in understanding – cooperating by the same laws evident in the hand of god: the laws of nature, the natural law of reciprocity, the christian law of love, and the evolutionary law of transcendence into the gods we imagine.
-
The First Sermon : Are You Christian as You Claim?
—“No good can come from alliance with anti-christs”—
[T]he question is whether one is “anti” Jesus’ teachings, or “anti” dogmatic text that was added to those teachings by others, or anti those who pretend to follow Jesus but don’t. We follow Jesus by action, and action alone. Whether by faith, tradition, or reason. Or we do not follow Jesus’ actions. Instead, we use the cover of faith for selfish indulgence and unchristian inaction. And your demand for obedience to YOU, to YOUR interpretation of dogmatic text, to YOUR faith in abandoning reason, rather than our faith in tradition of followers of Jesus, our imitation of Jesus, or in our reason about him, is a violation of Jesus’ teaching. It is you who are anti-christ. For you Jesus was a prophet. For some of us he was a philosopher. For others he was a law giver. For others a social scientist. Because each of us differs in how we understand the world, emotionally, rationally, practically, or empirically. And instead of intolerance of those who do not imitate jesus’ teaching of love your neighbor as you love yourself, you are intolerant of others who do not satisfy your selfish demand that others understand the world on your terms. The dogmatically faithful demonstrate loyalty to one another by loyalty to dogma so that together they create a social construction (tribe), so that together they can serve as a social and political FORCE – a resistance movement – against other tools of status signaling: power. It has absolutely nothing to do with loving thy neighbor as you would love yourself – the extension of familial love to kith and kin. It has everything to do with hatred of they neighbor for not adapting to your form of making sense of the world: your selfishness and greed. You either act as Jesus acted and asks us to act toward one another, or you are not christian. You are an activist in a political movement no different from, and no less destructive than, the cancers of judaism and Islam. It is in acting toward one another in large numbers we create the christian peoples that together raise mankind out of perpetual conflict, deceit, mistrust, and the resulting ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, child mortality early death and condition of victimhood to a nature all but hostile to our lives. You’re the unchristian anti-christ in your selfishness, greed, and arrogance – you are not the children of god – just petulant children infantilizing each other with the magical thinking of women so thoroughly that you are unable to mature fully into adult men who take material responsibility for the world – and like women you leave it up to those of us who mature into men anyway while you petulantly and arrogantly demand we service you – rather than engage like the rest of us in honest, Christian, voluntary, reciprocity – exchange – regardless of our different means of understanding the world. Many of us do not need ‘training’ like farm animals. We merely need understand that either by the evidence of tradition, and reason, that teaching people to act as did Jesus whether they learn best by ritual, parable, theology, philosophy, tradition, or science, is dependent upon how each of us best learns to regulate our behavior so that we CAN act as Jesus asked. Some of us are filled with continuous emotional sensitivity, fear, and impulses – the child and female biased mind. Some of us have none of it and worry only abut the survival of the tribe – the adult male biased mind – we are informed only by observation, evidence, and reason independent of emotion and impulse. If God made us, he made us different so that we could divide the labor of comprehending the infant, child, teen, adult, and mature, and aged, in male and female conditions, in many different environments, encountering many different challenges, so that TOGETHER we could transcend the animal and evolve into those worthy to sit beside him at his table – converting this world and all worlds in the universe into his eden. Only the infant, the child, and the insecure female mind like that of the domesticated animal herd of sheep, cow, and horse, that want us to be think and feel the same. It is the mature mind that understands that we evolve into packs, and divide the labor of sensing, perceiving, understanding, choosing, negotiating for, coopering on, and completing the tasks of our ascent into godhood, generation by generation, by our differences in understanding – cooperating by the same laws evident in the hand of god: the laws of nature, the natural law of reciprocity, the christian law of love, and the evolutionary law of transcendence into the gods we imagine.
-
The Undermining of The Masculine by Magical Thinking
(important summary) [T]he military was shut out of politics. Then men’s organizations shut off and out of civil society. Then the family undermined to shut men out of the family. Then manliness shut out of education. Then men and manliness shut out of discourse. And only once that was accomplished could the enemy fully remove european sense making: realism, naturalism, operationalism and our heroism and duty, Excellence and Beauty, Truth and reciprocity, Law and Jury, and markets and eugenics – How, persistent, relentless undermining – the warfare strategy of the human female. It was all by design. The design to restore the pre-civilizational strategy of the female and the herd. A design driven by instinct not rason. However, there are no female civilizations for reason – they cannot survive. Yet they try over and over again to fail. Why? “Predisposition to magical thinking.” The predisposition to magical thinking is as relentless as the predisposition to undermine. Neither Eve nor Pandora received the punishment they deserved. … Until now.
-
The Undermining of The Masculine by Magical Thinking
(important summary) [T]he military was shut out of politics. Then men’s organizations shut off and out of civil society. Then the family undermined to shut men out of the family. Then manliness shut out of education. Then men and manliness shut out of discourse. And only once that was accomplished could the enemy fully remove european sense making: realism, naturalism, operationalism and our heroism and duty, Excellence and Beauty, Truth and reciprocity, Law and Jury, and markets and eugenics – How, persistent, relentless undermining – the warfare strategy of the human female. It was all by design. The design to restore the pre-civilizational strategy of the female and the herd. A design driven by instinct not rason. However, there are no female civilizations for reason – they cannot survive. Yet they try over and over again to fail. Why? “Predisposition to magical thinking.” The predisposition to magical thinking is as relentless as the predisposition to undermine. Neither Eve nor Pandora received the punishment they deserved. … Until now.
-
But I’m Not Creating a Popular Political Movement I’m Creating a Revolution and A Body of Law
BUT I’M NOT CREATING A POPULAR POLITICAL MOVEMENT I’M CREATING A REVOLUTION AND A BODY OF LAW (and frankly y’all got nobody else at all other than me with anything to offer.)
—“Curt: Don’t you realize that what you are trying to do is start a political movement? P must be a political movement if it’s ever going to get off the ground. You can talk all you want about it being the final conclusion to logic and science. You know what? That and $4 will get you a cup from Starbucks. I would personally like to see some P principles in our constitution. But it ain’t gonna happen if you don’t build constituencies. And the number one group that could be in your corner is conservative Christians. But that isn’t going to happen because you are too dogmatic about the folly of Christianity. I am offering you some advice. Delete all negative references to Christianity in your writings. Stop telling Christians they are foolish, failures, weak, arrogant, disobedient and wasting their time believing in the fake man in the sky. You are trying to build a political movement (herd) whether you choose to admit it or not. Who is going to be followers of the P movement? Marxists? Socialists? Antifa? The leftist academic elitists? The deep state? The parasitic democrats dependent on government transfer payments, single mothers, millions of recent immigrants, the AOC & Bernie millennials? No. It’s Euro Americans of which a huge number are Christian. And you’re going to piss them off. You are NOT going to gain any traction by alienating what should be your core constituency. You can be self-righteous in your P dogma and lose. Or you can try to win by forging alliances with those who can help you move forward. Choose wisely.”— Herod Bedford
Go to my twitter page. What does the pinned tweet say? Here. I’m going to post it below for you. My response is that instead you stop making excuses for the truth in order to burying your head in the sand using faith as an excuse. You can never have a theocracy. You can only have trifunctionalism, or you can disappear from this earth. Truth and Law vs Wisdom and Faith. I’m not looking for a majority, any more than were the founders. I’m looking for 1% or less of the population that will fight to restore the constitution and our civilization without pandering to anyone, whether christian, or fascist, or marxist-socialist-postmodernist-feminist, or anything in between – we are made from rule of law and christianity, fascism, liberalism, and leftism are all privileged cults of fantasy that are possible because the few – the very few – were willing to pick up, carry arms, sally forth, and fight to preserve them despite cowards like you. Either your civilization and its operating system of law comes first, or you are an enemy of our people. If your faith is before your people, or you are the enemy of our people. if it comes before our law, our people, and our civilization then you are the enemy of your people. Your privilege of faith is due to our civilization, and our law, and the truth within our law that you deny in order to maintain your faith. Christian self congratulatory delusions are only possible, as is judaism, because real men fight for the law to have the freedom to provide you with that self indulgence. The few strong, reciprocal, and brave, do not need the approval of the many weak, irreciprocal, and cowardly. So grow up, man up, shut up, and fight for our law. Because the survival of your faith is predicated on it.
-
But I’m Not Creating a Popular Political Movement I’m Creating a Revolution and A Body of Law
BUT I’M NOT CREATING A POPULAR POLITICAL MOVEMENT I’M CREATING A REVOLUTION AND A BODY OF LAW (and frankly y’all got nobody else at all other than me with anything to offer.)
—“Curt: Don’t you realize that what you are trying to do is start a political movement? P must be a political movement if it’s ever going to get off the ground. You can talk all you want about it being the final conclusion to logic and science. You know what? That and $4 will get you a cup from Starbucks. I would personally like to see some P principles in our constitution. But it ain’t gonna happen if you don’t build constituencies. And the number one group that could be in your corner is conservative Christians. But that isn’t going to happen because you are too dogmatic about the folly of Christianity. I am offering you some advice. Delete all negative references to Christianity in your writings. Stop telling Christians they are foolish, failures, weak, arrogant, disobedient and wasting their time believing in the fake man in the sky. You are trying to build a political movement (herd) whether you choose to admit it or not. Who is going to be followers of the P movement? Marxists? Socialists? Antifa? The leftist academic elitists? The deep state? The parasitic democrats dependent on government transfer payments, single mothers, millions of recent immigrants, the AOC & Bernie millennials? No. It’s Euro Americans of which a huge number are Christian. And you’re going to piss them off. You are NOT going to gain any traction by alienating what should be your core constituency. You can be self-righteous in your P dogma and lose. Or you can try to win by forging alliances with those who can help you move forward. Choose wisely.”— Herod Bedford
Go to my twitter page. What does the pinned tweet say? Here. I’m going to post it below for you. My response is that instead you stop making excuses for the truth in order to burying your head in the sand using faith as an excuse. You can never have a theocracy. You can only have trifunctionalism, or you can disappear from this earth. Truth and Law vs Wisdom and Faith. I’m not looking for a majority, any more than were the founders. I’m looking for 1% or less of the population that will fight to restore the constitution and our civilization without pandering to anyone, whether christian, or fascist, or marxist-socialist-postmodernist-feminist, or anything in between – we are made from rule of law and christianity, fascism, liberalism, and leftism are all privileged cults of fantasy that are possible because the few – the very few – were willing to pick up, carry arms, sally forth, and fight to preserve them despite cowards like you. Either your civilization and its operating system of law comes first, or you are an enemy of our people. If your faith is before your people, or you are the enemy of our people. if it comes before our law, our people, and our civilization then you are the enemy of your people. Your privilege of faith is due to our civilization, and our law, and the truth within our law that you deny in order to maintain your faith. Christian self congratulatory delusions are only possible, as is judaism, because real men fight for the law to have the freedom to provide you with that self indulgence. The few strong, reciprocal, and brave, do not need the approval of the many weak, irreciprocal, and cowardly. So grow up, man up, shut up, and fight for our law. Because the survival of your faith is predicated on it.
-
Religion and Conspiracy Theory Share the Same Error of Feminine Cognition: Imputation of Intent
(possibly important)
—“Pattern recognition isn’t the problem, it’s the “imputing conscious intent” where none exists or cannot be demonstrated.”— (Daniel and others)
[W]hy? Bias of brain and subsequent consciousness to think through an empathic lens rather than a systemic and material lens. The herd bias of empathy when grazing vs the pack bias of systems when hunting. The masculine brain sees systems where the feminine brain sees intentions. There is a place for religion and it is a necessary place for the mammal inside. DEBT: Where worship means demonstration of appreciation for inheritance: debt. – Nature worship (debt) – Kin and Ancestor worship (debt) – Gods, demigods, heroes and saints worship (debt) CAPITALIZATION: And training in mindfulness: – Action: Heroism – achievement (cost) – Reason: stoicism – self authoring (cost) – Experience: epicureanism – community building (cost) REWARD: And the Ritual of the Feast – building community. – The Gathering, The Fire, The Call (reward) – The Parable, The Oath, the Testimony (reward) – The Sacrifice, The Feast, The Thanks (reward) – The Celebration (festival), The Sport(competition), The Dispersal (rest) (reward) RULES: There are three sets of laws evident in the structure of the universe whether those laws were made by structural consequence, the design of divinity, or the hand of god. – The laws of nature. (physical limits) – The natural law of Sovereignty and Reciprocity (personal limits) … – With the christian law of love improving upon natural law – The evolutionary law of transcendence of man into gods. (political limits) Grow up, Man up, Shut up, Show up. And win.
-
Religion and Conspiracy Theory Share the Same Error of Feminine Cognition: Imputation of Intent
(possibly important)
—“Pattern recognition isn’t the problem, it’s the “imputing conscious intent” where none exists or cannot be demonstrated.”— (Daniel and others)
[W]hy? Bias of brain and subsequent consciousness to think through an empathic lens rather than a systemic and material lens. The herd bias of empathy when grazing vs the pack bias of systems when hunting. The masculine brain sees systems where the feminine brain sees intentions. There is a place for religion and it is a necessary place for the mammal inside. DEBT: Where worship means demonstration of appreciation for inheritance: debt. – Nature worship (debt) – Kin and Ancestor worship (debt) – Gods, demigods, heroes and saints worship (debt) CAPITALIZATION: And training in mindfulness: – Action: Heroism – achievement (cost) – Reason: stoicism – self authoring (cost) – Experience: epicureanism – community building (cost) REWARD: And the Ritual of the Feast – building community. – The Gathering, The Fire, The Call (reward) – The Parable, The Oath, the Testimony (reward) – The Sacrifice, The Feast, The Thanks (reward) – The Celebration (festival), The Sport(competition), The Dispersal (rest) (reward) RULES: There are three sets of laws evident in the structure of the universe whether those laws were made by structural consequence, the design of divinity, or the hand of god. – The laws of nature. (physical limits) – The natural law of Sovereignty and Reciprocity (personal limits) … – With the christian law of love improving upon natural law – The evolutionary law of transcendence of man into gods. (political limits) Grow up, Man up, Shut up, Show up. And win.
-
The Future of Marriage Will Return to Historical Norm – and That’s Not Monogamy
[D]uring most of agrarian age history, when man and woman married they could divide labor of creating common property (household) so that man could have a tribe and woman a nest, and both freedom from parental control over the allocation of resources. Getting married meant freedom and sovereignty. A lot. This was true until the postwar boom. In the present age, unless a woman wants to raise replacement levels of children, children are now an amusement, and men are an unnecessary and more easily sacrificed cost. Without the need for children’s support in old age there is no incentive to have them sufficient to preserve the incentive to invest in marriage and replacement level children. Social Security was suicidal. The pill added a noose. No fault divorce created the hanging tree. We already know, of course, that women wield the ultimate veto power in the mating game. It is women who give thumbs-up or thumbs-down to any advances or proposals from men. Briffault clarifies by asserting that intimate relationships between men and women result from a calculated cost/benefit analysis by women. Will she or won’t she acquire a net gain from any relationship with the man? This does not necessarily mean monetary gain, although it might. Other types of gain might be social status, sexual compatibility, anticipated future happiness, emotional security, and the male’s capacity for fatherhood. Men are costly for a woman in attention, emotion, time, effort and reproductive opportunity – and her children take priority over him. Their value at present is largely income and status and that is decreasingly immaterial. Women are costly for men in his specialization, lower adaptivity to new groups, his cellular damage, his shorter life span, his shorter working life, and his shorter savings horizon, and his reproductive opportunity. But a woman’s care is extremely valuable to a man. He trades all these things for the care of a woman. Unless both parties stay socialized and fit, sex dissipates quickly. It isn’t clear that agrarian marriage can continue as a majority habit and it’s more likely we will continue to return to human norms of serial monogamy, treating relationships like careers, except for the upper classes that as always gain so much value from shared assets status shared oppporutnity that the economics still make sense. === (Some content in this post is from John Brennan)