Jan 5, 2020, 2:48 PM We can, and do, falsify all human action in court. The question was, could we falsify all human speech in court. The answer is yes. The usual problem is that someone wants an ideology(political) philosophy (secular theological), or theology (supernatural theological) solution – which is impossible. Because Science (truthful testimony) is falsificationary. As far as I know, P is complete. And there are no false or ir-reciprocal statements that can survive its falsification. That fact that people can’t get their noggins around the fact that all science (testimony) like markets (competition) is falsificationary is a common problem. But it stems from a failure to understand that science is falsificationary, then demanding P, like philosophy, ideology, or religion be justificationary. It’s not. So they criticize P for not being a science on the one hand by false presumption science is justificationary, and then complain P isn’t justificationary. Kind of silly really, but you can see where they get it from. Most people are stuck in the error of “Mathiness” because they don’t grasp the constitution of, or limits of, mathematics. Math breaks down in all three directions: the very small, the very large, and the very-human (cognitive): economics. If you need a positive theology, philosophy, ideology, sophism, or pseudoscience, then I understand the via-positiva is necessary for simple minds. But grownups are not afraid of via-negativa (skepticism), because we know all non trivial non tautological propositions are contingent, because we may always or nearly always, discover some novel parsimony that allows us to reorganize our paradigms for greater consistency, correspondence, coherence, completeness and parsimony than before.
Form: Mini Essay
-
Differences in Standards
Jan 5, 2020, 2:53 PM by Vengefül Bobmoran High trust people require not only the absence of conflict of interest, but also the absence of appearance of conflict of interest, as the appearance itself is enough to erode trust and imposes a huge cost on everyone. The left applies the bare minimum ghetto ethic (no provable conflict of interest – cheap, easy deniability and pilpul) to its own, but will gladly apply our standards (no appearance of conflict of interest – expensive compliance) to us. They don’t even care about maintaining trust; they just intuit the huge costs of adherence to our standards and attack us with it, in the same way that they use the judicial process itself, rather than the judgement, as a weapon. This also explains how they can suddenly be more Catholic than the Pope when criticizing us: it’s all about maximizing the costs (damages) they can impose.
-
Differences in Standards
Jan 5, 2020, 2:53 PM by Vengefül Bobmoran High trust people require not only the absence of conflict of interest, but also the absence of appearance of conflict of interest, as the appearance itself is enough to erode trust and imposes a huge cost on everyone. The left applies the bare minimum ghetto ethic (no provable conflict of interest – cheap, easy deniability and pilpul) to its own, but will gladly apply our standards (no appearance of conflict of interest – expensive compliance) to us. They don’t even care about maintaining trust; they just intuit the huge costs of adherence to our standards and attack us with it, in the same way that they use the judicial process itself, rather than the judgement, as a weapon. This also explains how they can suddenly be more Catholic than the Pope when criticizing us: it’s all about maximizing the costs (damages) they can impose.
-
Economics Is Just an Extension of Physics
Jan 5, 2020, 3:53 PM We can quantify all sorts of metrics of human behavior, but you’re confusing mathematics with physics, the same way most people confuse averages with instances or distributions. In other words, mathematics describes averages of points in time, it doesn’t not describe operations.Mathematics consist of operations that describe states and changes in states and averages. But not the underlying operations. Physics studies both the quantitative and the operational. Mathematics just the quantitative (positional). So while mathematics describes ‘sums’ operations describe changes in state. Here: At every “level’ of reality we discover an underlying limited number of operations (Grammar) producing some set of symmetries (outcomes, equilibria), and above that a new limited number of operations (Grammar, outcomes, equilibria)) that produce another set of symmetries, and above that and so on. So, we don’t yet know what causes the quantum level We have a fairly good idea what causes the subatomic level. we have a very good idea what causes the atomic level. We have such a good understanding of chemistry that it’s boring. We are getting a fair understanding of biochemistry (and that it’s mechanical). We are getting a beginning understanding of proteins (and that it’s mechanical(operational) ) We are getting a beginning understanding of genetic reproduction (and that it’s mechanical- operational) . We are getting a fairly good understanding of cells. We have a more than fairly good understanding of multi-cellular (complex) organisms. I’ll stop there since I think you can see the pattern of some set of physically possible operations producing a finite set of physically possible states, followed by another set of physically possible operations producing a finite set of physically possible states, and that this process continues indefinitely, all the way to what we call consciousness. Now life buys us conservation of energy (defeat of entropy), but it’s still bound by the laws of physics (the underlying grammars). Memory buys us prediction. And prediction provides our ability to perform operations (actions) that improve our defeat of entropy. Increase in neural( brain) volume provides Competition between predictions, which provides us choices of options for defeating entropy. Increase in Brain volume provides iterations on predictions for increasing choices of defeating entropy the sequence of actions (or inactions for that matter). Increase in brain volume provides prediction of others predictions and predicting opportunities for cooperation that further improve our ability to capture and use energy by defeating entropy. Human ability to capture energy is limited by the grammar of human action (possible actions and sequences of actions and parallel combinations of other’s actions). So the grammar of human action consists in the physical, emotional-intuitionistic, and cognitive operations. Those operations are bounded by physical limitations of the grammars upon which they are constructed. Both Physics and Economics are bound by the same underlying grammars (laws) but because humans have memories, prediction, sentience, and consciousness, reason, calculation, symbolism, and computation, we can use debts and credits with each other to temporarily lend to each other, in presumption of future returns on that investment or debt. We don’t violate that physical law. Because humans observe reciprocity (equilibrium) just as the physical world obeys equilibrium (entropy). If we didn’t we wouldn’t be here. And so some people specialize in capitalization (productivity) and some people specialize in consumption, and others in parasitism or predation. But in the end, over time, we are limited by the physical laws of the universe. We can create productivity (as does life), or we can parasite upon other lives (as do bacteria and viruses). We cannot run the clock on parasitism (Socialism or gypsies) or conquest (islamism) forever because we will run out of hosts to prey upon. So economics is just physics with debits and credits (ability t steal, to borrow, to exchange,to produce, or to save) made possible by consciousness, by test of reciprocity (account balances), within the limit of proportionality (exit). TRIANGLE: What limits to human operations? ………………What Limits?………………. ………………………|………………………… …………….Human Actions…………….. ……………..Consciousness……………. …………………Sentience……………….. …………………….Life……………………… …………………./…………………………… ……….subatomic..macro-atomic….. ………………./…………………………….. ……….?Limits………….Limits?………… Human limits are reciprocity (positive) with the limits of proportionality (negaitve). The subatomic level appears to run out of energy by maximum dissipation. The macro atomic level appears to run out of ability to compress energy. Sorry but it’s just Physics with the ability to use each other for debt and credit that we call ‘cooperation”.
-
Economics Is Just an Extension of Physics
Jan 5, 2020, 3:53 PM We can quantify all sorts of metrics of human behavior, but you’re confusing mathematics with physics, the same way most people confuse averages with instances or distributions. In other words, mathematics describes averages of points in time, it doesn’t not describe operations.Mathematics consist of operations that describe states and changes in states and averages. But not the underlying operations. Physics studies both the quantitative and the operational. Mathematics just the quantitative (positional). So while mathematics describes ‘sums’ operations describe changes in state. Here: At every “level’ of reality we discover an underlying limited number of operations (Grammar) producing some set of symmetries (outcomes, equilibria), and above that a new limited number of operations (Grammar, outcomes, equilibria)) that produce another set of symmetries, and above that and so on. So, we don’t yet know what causes the quantum level We have a fairly good idea what causes the subatomic level. we have a very good idea what causes the atomic level. We have such a good understanding of chemistry that it’s boring. We are getting a fair understanding of biochemistry (and that it’s mechanical). We are getting a beginning understanding of proteins (and that it’s mechanical(operational) ) We are getting a beginning understanding of genetic reproduction (and that it’s mechanical- operational) . We are getting a fairly good understanding of cells. We have a more than fairly good understanding of multi-cellular (complex) organisms. I’ll stop there since I think you can see the pattern of some set of physically possible operations producing a finite set of physically possible states, followed by another set of physically possible operations producing a finite set of physically possible states, and that this process continues indefinitely, all the way to what we call consciousness. Now life buys us conservation of energy (defeat of entropy), but it’s still bound by the laws of physics (the underlying grammars). Memory buys us prediction. And prediction provides our ability to perform operations (actions) that improve our defeat of entropy. Increase in neural( brain) volume provides Competition between predictions, which provides us choices of options for defeating entropy. Increase in Brain volume provides iterations on predictions for increasing choices of defeating entropy the sequence of actions (or inactions for that matter). Increase in brain volume provides prediction of others predictions and predicting opportunities for cooperation that further improve our ability to capture and use energy by defeating entropy. Human ability to capture energy is limited by the grammar of human action (possible actions and sequences of actions and parallel combinations of other’s actions). So the grammar of human action consists in the physical, emotional-intuitionistic, and cognitive operations. Those operations are bounded by physical limitations of the grammars upon which they are constructed. Both Physics and Economics are bound by the same underlying grammars (laws) but because humans have memories, prediction, sentience, and consciousness, reason, calculation, symbolism, and computation, we can use debts and credits with each other to temporarily lend to each other, in presumption of future returns on that investment or debt. We don’t violate that physical law. Because humans observe reciprocity (equilibrium) just as the physical world obeys equilibrium (entropy). If we didn’t we wouldn’t be here. And so some people specialize in capitalization (productivity) and some people specialize in consumption, and others in parasitism or predation. But in the end, over time, we are limited by the physical laws of the universe. We can create productivity (as does life), or we can parasite upon other lives (as do bacteria and viruses). We cannot run the clock on parasitism (Socialism or gypsies) or conquest (islamism) forever because we will run out of hosts to prey upon. So economics is just physics with debits and credits (ability t steal, to borrow, to exchange,to produce, or to save) made possible by consciousness, by test of reciprocity (account balances), within the limit of proportionality (exit). TRIANGLE: What limits to human operations? ………………What Limits?………………. ………………………|………………………… …………….Human Actions…………….. ……………..Consciousness……………. …………………Sentience……………….. …………………….Life……………………… …………………./…………………………… ……….subatomic..macro-atomic….. ………………./…………………………….. ……….?Limits………….Limits?………… Human limits are reciprocity (positive) with the limits of proportionality (negaitve). The subatomic level appears to run out of energy by maximum dissipation. The macro atomic level appears to run out of ability to compress energy. Sorry but it’s just Physics with the ability to use each other for debt and credit that we call ‘cooperation”.
-
What Does Truth Mean?
Jan 5, 2020, 7:31 PM Existence refers to persistence. The universe exists, and the matter in it exists, because it persists – we can identify that it exists because we posses memory. We can identify patterns of constant relations in that persist in that universe – that universe is deterministic at any scale at which we can identify patterns of constant relations. We can generalize those patterns of constant relations. We can identify unique instances of those patterns of constant relations. We can name them. We name states(nouns), substitutes for states (pronouns), and properties of states (adjectives), operations (verbs), and properties of operations (adverbs) and we can agree or disagree (yes/no, agree disagree, approve reject) We can form and speak(display word and deed) transactions(phrases) and transaction sets (sentences), and sets of transaction sets (stories) We can agree with those transactions, transaction sets, and sets of transaction sets (true/false) We can speak in promise, suggestion, question, agreement, opposition, or silence. When we claim we speak truthfully we speak promissorily. One can speak truthfully or untruthfully. When we speak truthfully we speak coherently with categorically, internally (logically), externally (empirically), operationally(sequence of actions) consistency, and use due diligence to disambiguate any possibility of misinterpretation. We can speak untruthfully because of ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, fictionalism, deceit, and denial. We are forever ignorant so while we have discovered how to gradually iterate to the most parsimonious hierarchy of consistent and commensurable paradigms (networks of continuous relations at given scales, and in given contexts), in that set of Grammars we call “science”. Truth can and only can consist of language in some grammar or other, reducible to analogy to experience, testable by human logical facility. So while patterns of constant relations exist in the universe, and we can name those patterns, that thing we call truth consists of language humans discover, organize and iteratively refine through a process of continuous recursive disambiguation as information increases. The human mind works by using sequences of stimuli (patterns) to produce predictions of fragments, object, models, spaces(places), borders, locations, and episodes. The mind then recursively predicts possibilities from those predictions using auto association. We then use attention to choose which auto associations to permute upon. This is how we imagine, and control what we imagine. Because we can imagine, we imagine that truth exists, when only phenomenon exists ,and truth consists of the formula by which we describe it. Man discovers constant relations and creates truthful descriptions of those constant relations. Truthful statements are made by man because only man (so far) speaks. When we say honest we say the speaker promises his words are free of suggestion, obscurantism, fictionalism, deceit and denial. When we say truthful, we mean, that operational name (description) which is not false, and satisfies market demand for decidability in the given context, given the present knowledge, and free of bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, fictionalism, and deceit, where the individual uttering it has performed due diligence against ignorance and error. When we claim a statement is true we promise that it satisfies market demand for decidability given the context. When we agree that a statement ‘is true’ that means that we AGREE that it satisfies market demand for decidability given the context. When we say ‘the truth’ we mean either a parsimonious operational name for the constant relations we refer to, or the MOST parsimonious name for the constant relations we refer to. Of the various civilizations which has produced the only method of due diligence with which to speak the most parsimonious categorically consistent, internally consistent, externally correspondent, operational, complete, and fully accounted operational names? Of the various civilizations which has paid the high cost of normalizing truth before face regardless of cost to self, competence, dominance hierarchy? Only man speaks, only man describes, only man describes in operational names, only operational names are complete and commensurable, only complete and commensurable operational names are parsimonious, only parsimony provides minimum difference between the most parsimonious possible and the current state of knowledge. I could work on this further but you get the point. That truth must be discovered, named, and uttered (in some form). Truth is made. Truth is uttered, Truth is promised, Truth satisfies the market demand for decidability. We consent to that decidability by equal means -or we do not. The universe merely exists.
-
What Does Truth Mean?
Jan 5, 2020, 7:31 PM Existence refers to persistence. The universe exists, and the matter in it exists, because it persists – we can identify that it exists because we posses memory. We can identify patterns of constant relations in that persist in that universe – that universe is deterministic at any scale at which we can identify patterns of constant relations. We can generalize those patterns of constant relations. We can identify unique instances of those patterns of constant relations. We can name them. We name states(nouns), substitutes for states (pronouns), and properties of states (adjectives), operations (verbs), and properties of operations (adverbs) and we can agree or disagree (yes/no, agree disagree, approve reject) We can form and speak(display word and deed) transactions(phrases) and transaction sets (sentences), and sets of transaction sets (stories) We can agree with those transactions, transaction sets, and sets of transaction sets (true/false) We can speak in promise, suggestion, question, agreement, opposition, or silence. When we claim we speak truthfully we speak promissorily. One can speak truthfully or untruthfully. When we speak truthfully we speak coherently with categorically, internally (logically), externally (empirically), operationally(sequence of actions) consistency, and use due diligence to disambiguate any possibility of misinterpretation. We can speak untruthfully because of ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, fictionalism, deceit, and denial. We are forever ignorant so while we have discovered how to gradually iterate to the most parsimonious hierarchy of consistent and commensurable paradigms (networks of continuous relations at given scales, and in given contexts), in that set of Grammars we call “science”. Truth can and only can consist of language in some grammar or other, reducible to analogy to experience, testable by human logical facility. So while patterns of constant relations exist in the universe, and we can name those patterns, that thing we call truth consists of language humans discover, organize and iteratively refine through a process of continuous recursive disambiguation as information increases. The human mind works by using sequences of stimuli (patterns) to produce predictions of fragments, object, models, spaces(places), borders, locations, and episodes. The mind then recursively predicts possibilities from those predictions using auto association. We then use attention to choose which auto associations to permute upon. This is how we imagine, and control what we imagine. Because we can imagine, we imagine that truth exists, when only phenomenon exists ,and truth consists of the formula by which we describe it. Man discovers constant relations and creates truthful descriptions of those constant relations. Truthful statements are made by man because only man (so far) speaks. When we say honest we say the speaker promises his words are free of suggestion, obscurantism, fictionalism, deceit and denial. When we say truthful, we mean, that operational name (description) which is not false, and satisfies market demand for decidability in the given context, given the present knowledge, and free of bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, fictionalism, and deceit, where the individual uttering it has performed due diligence against ignorance and error. When we claim a statement is true we promise that it satisfies market demand for decidability given the context. When we agree that a statement ‘is true’ that means that we AGREE that it satisfies market demand for decidability given the context. When we say ‘the truth’ we mean either a parsimonious operational name for the constant relations we refer to, or the MOST parsimonious name for the constant relations we refer to. Of the various civilizations which has produced the only method of due diligence with which to speak the most parsimonious categorically consistent, internally consistent, externally correspondent, operational, complete, and fully accounted operational names? Of the various civilizations which has paid the high cost of normalizing truth before face regardless of cost to self, competence, dominance hierarchy? Only man speaks, only man describes, only man describes in operational names, only operational names are complete and commensurable, only complete and commensurable operational names are parsimonious, only parsimony provides minimum difference between the most parsimonious possible and the current state of knowledge. I could work on this further but you get the point. That truth must be discovered, named, and uttered (in some form). Truth is made. Truth is uttered, Truth is promised, Truth satisfies the market demand for decidability. We consent to that decidability by equal means -or we do not. The universe merely exists.
-
Trump’s New Space Force Would Enhance Israel and The Future United States Militarily
Jan 6, 2020, 3:33 PM With Trump’s new Space Force, comes Jerusalem’s ( or Tel Aviv, if you like ) comparative military advantage in the Middle East. Now under the Air Force Secretary, when the United States Space Force evolve into a fully fledged arm of the United States military, you can expect that it’s secured communication, observatory, and global positioning capabilities would be leveraged by Israel for its regional and international pursuits. Contemporary and future wars are no longer about soldier numbers and or volumes. Iran’s Qassem Soleimani demonstrated this with his assymetrical success in:
- Yemen against Saudi Arabia, using the Houthis
Syria against ISIS and other sunni militia
Iraq by way of multiple shia paramilitia
Lebanon and Gaza against the Lebanese regime and Israel respectively
The world’s labelled terror organizations demonstrated this also. Israel demonsrated this against the Iranian quest to a quicker nuclear break out capability when it unleashed stuxnet with United States co-operation against Iranian centrifuges. The United States demonstrated this with the Obama era drone assassination program, then inherited by Trump and which executed Soleimani this January. Evidently, to cripple civilisations in our days require not soldiers numbers per se but skilled, capable, committed operatives. Targeting the GETRR:
- Gas
- Electrical grid
- Telecommunication infrastructure
- Roads
- Railway
D day sabotage in assymetrical offensives, are victory – clinching just as the first successful nuclear impact may determine the eventual winner in an all out war. Military superiority in space allow for defense and so deterrence while providing the means for pre emptive offense that may prevent actual wars. Trump’s Space Force would thus enhance US – Israeli military superiority in the long term except the constitution of the United States national security establisment as it stand today, is restructured to new objectives overall. Erik Lukovsky James Santagata Curt Doolittle
-
Trump’s New Space Force Would Enhance Israel and The Future United States Militarily
Jan 6, 2020, 3:33 PM With Trump’s new Space Force, comes Jerusalem’s ( or Tel Aviv, if you like ) comparative military advantage in the Middle East. Now under the Air Force Secretary, when the United States Space Force evolve into a fully fledged arm of the United States military, you can expect that it’s secured communication, observatory, and global positioning capabilities would be leveraged by Israel for its regional and international pursuits. Contemporary and future wars are no longer about soldier numbers and or volumes. Iran’s Qassem Soleimani demonstrated this with his assymetrical success in:
- Yemen against Saudi Arabia, using the Houthis
Syria against ISIS and other sunni militia
Iraq by way of multiple shia paramilitia
Lebanon and Gaza against the Lebanese regime and Israel respectively
The world’s labelled terror organizations demonstrated this also. Israel demonsrated this against the Iranian quest to a quicker nuclear break out capability when it unleashed stuxnet with United States co-operation against Iranian centrifuges. The United States demonstrated this with the Obama era drone assassination program, then inherited by Trump and which executed Soleimani this January. Evidently, to cripple civilisations in our days require not soldiers numbers per se but skilled, capable, committed operatives. Targeting the GETRR:
- Gas
- Electrical grid
- Telecommunication infrastructure
- Roads
- Railway
D day sabotage in assymetrical offensives, are victory – clinching just as the first successful nuclear impact may determine the eventual winner in an all out war. Military superiority in space allow for defense and so deterrence while providing the means for pre emptive offense that may prevent actual wars. Trump’s Space Force would thus enhance US – Israeli military superiority in the long term except the constitution of the United States national security establisment as it stand today, is restructured to new objectives overall. Erik Lukovsky James Santagata Curt Doolittle
-
The End of Democracy?
Jan 7, 2020, 9:48 AM We can save democracy in some form if we modify the franchise and create houses for the classes again, and give women a separate house. But (as Samuel Huntington warned) democracy cannot survive Islam. Between (1) granting women the franchise, (2) postwar jewish marxism-socialism-postmodernism-feminism-denialism and (3) Islamic religion-of-continuous-war-and-conquest by continuous undermining, without Monarchy as a judge of last resort and without our traditional law of sovereignty in ‘Inviolable Book’ form, and without a Civilization’s State religion we are not able to resist (defeat) the ease at which women’s intuition for undermining, the jewish and muslim strategy of undermining can be combined to destroy the only civilization to drag mankind out of the perpetual dark age of Abrahamic Ignorance and Deceit. Judaism, Islam, and Christianity cost us all the great civilizations of the ancient world: North African, Egyptian, Levantine, Persian, Byzantine, Roman, Greek, The Indus region of India, And was stopped only because it consumes whatever people adopt it, and reduces them to perpetual externalization of inner conflict through blame of others, whereas every other religious system provides mindfulness within the self. Western civilization uniquely created continuous innovation and adaptation by the direction of dominance expression to the production of commons: Heroism, Excellence, Truth, Duty, Sovereignty and Reciprocity before Self all favor others (the polity) in exchange for status, and status produces mindfulness by existential, demonstrated, evidentiary, constructive means. Sovereignty requires reciprocity, reciprocity requires the natural law of tort, jury, and court of peers, and cooperation is limited to markets in every domain of life regardless of station. Markets in every domain of life produce the most rapid means of adaptation. Adaptation of the law by continuous competition in court produces the most rapid means of political adaptation. material heroism by the use of technology, contract and maneuver, produce the most rapid means of technological adaptation. It is this heroism and sovereignty that came west into europe with the indo-european expansion. It’s that heroism and sovereignty that made Greece and rome. It was semitic false promise of a monopoly underclass desirable for women and slaves, and the forcible imposition of superstition, by a priesthood selling lies that replaced a martial aristocracy demonstrating truth, and a failure to constrain roman expansion to the rate at which people could be civilized into a martial and middle class society that created the opportunity for a dark age, and the vast numbers of muslim raiders that destroyed civilizations, arts, knowledge, and trade routes that produced the First Semitic Dark age. But it is our failure to learn from that experience and to change from western market tolerance to western monopoly warfare against these enemies that threatens a second semitic dark age. The Group’s Strategy was to replace science with pseudoscience(Marx,Freud,Boas), Math with pseudo-mathematics (Cantor, Bohr), reason with sophistry(Derrida), class and gender cooperation with conflict(Adorno, Friedan), Heroism with Victimization(Frankfurt), and Law with Politics. Just as they had replaced the west’s ‘book’ of Homer, Our Aristocratic Hero of Achilles, our Family of the Gods, and our rational law, empiricism, and reason with the semitic ‘books’, the victim-hero of jews and jesus persecution, the family of jewish heroes, the apostles and saints, supernatural law, supernaturalism, and the great semitic deceit using false promise, baiting into hazard, pilpul (sophistry to avoid argument and truth), critique (disapproval, straw manning, and poisoning the well to avoid argument and truth), hiding under voluntary choice, plausible deniability for the hazard and unfalsifiability of promises to create not innovation and production, evolution and transcendence, but devolution, ignorance, submission, consumption, destruction and and dysgenia. Their group strategy like the female’s is Anti-civilization: Their Pursuit of a Second Dark Age. Undermining and conflict generation is the instinctive female strategy and that their (((Elites))) are the antithesis – mirror image – of western civilization’s Creation, Innovation, Cooperation by Markets, Reciprocity, Rule of Law, Heroism, Truth. There is no difference between jewish invention of false promises in ancient world, christian destruction of the the european ancient world, and islamic destruction of the rest of the civilizations of the ancient world, and the jewish invention of false promises of denial, sophistry, and pseudoscience in Marxism in economics, fruedianism in psychology, boasianism in anthropology, cantorian-bohr math, frankfurt in cultural marxism, postmodern relativism and denialism, in academy, undermining rule of law in the courts, and marxist, feminist, postmodern identitarian conflict generation under pretense that markets are not the only possible means of cooperation. They literally have tried to destroy truth, reason, and reason and cooperation by exchange in every possible dimension of human reason, knowledge, and cooperation. The hindus produced wisdom literature in myth. Chinese produced wisdom literature and reason. The europeans produced wisdom literature in empiricism. But the semites produced a wisdom literature of lies. Why? Hermes and the cart of lies. Why did Semites invent lying? Likely Because professional (huckster) religion started in Anatolia-Mesopotamia, and it ameliorated the differences between very different tribes at the intersection of trade routes across four continents. The cure of course is to produce our own ‘Book’ that canonizes the group strategy of western civilization’s continuous innovation and adaptation – the civilization that dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition, tyranny, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early, death, and the status of victims of a nature all but deliberately hostile to human life. That book would state our history, our strategy, our law, and our method of reasoning in the language of our Natural Religion: Heroism, Excellence, Truth, Duty, Sovereignty and Reciprocity before Self, and markets in all aspects of life: association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons, polities, and war. And it would, as do all books, set the terms by which none may trespass in thought, display, word, or deed – regardless of rank, nation, race or excuse. Heroism and Man for the Aristocracy, Stoicism and Nature for the able, Christianity for the vulnerable. That is the end purpose of the P-law project. And a revolution and restoration and renaissance of our civilization. And an end to semitic dark ages in European alliance with Sinic, Hindu, and African civilizations will bring it about. Truth can win if men choose. It is just our choice. Edit