Dec 26, 2019, 9:54 AM The propertarian constitution solves one problem – the problem of the abrahamic conquests made possible by roman imperial administration and law combined with and greek literacy and reason, and the problem of the 20th century made possible by the industrial and technical revolutions: the institutionalization of deception made possible by mass media, and fiat credit. We solve that problem by demanding Truth and Reciprocity in all aspects of commerce and commons to end (a) false promise (b) baiting into hazard, and (c) rent-seeking (gains without contribution to the risk of productivity). So we require full reciprocity: 1. Productive (prohibition on rents and free riding) 2. fully informed ( prohibition on false promise, obscurantism) 3. voluntary transfer (prohibition on takings of demonstrated interests) 4. including by externality (including others indirectly) 5. warrantied (liability for productivity, fully informed, voluntary transfer. Where all speech in such matters is treated as legal testimony, meaning it must meet the criteria of consistency in the dimensions 1. categorical, 2. logical, 3. operational, 4. empirical, 5. rational, 6. reciprocal 7. complete within limits, and the consequences of which are 8. within one’s ability to perform restitution. And the propertarian constitution institutes: 1. Reformations to institutions and processes thereby eliminating all means of parasitism. 2. Restitutions to those who have been harmed. 3. Punishments for those who have done harm. 4. Preventions: Changes in the constitution and the law creating a continuous market for profiting from the punishment of these forms of parasitism, once again forcing us into the market for voluntary cooperation in oder to survive, prosper, and flourish. So the propertarian constitution is structured as the prosecution of a crime by entire classes of people, and the restitutions, punishments, and preventions under law. This will be the greatest boon to western civilization since the industrial revolution, and will effectively outlaw the entire leftist program, prosecute, impoverish, ostracize, or imprison (or worse) those who have perpetrated this crime against our people. And hopefully it will end the abrahamic program forever.
Form: Mini Essay
-
What Does Democracy Depend Upon?
Dec 26, 2019, 3:26 PM The absurd propositions that: (a) The people are capable of making positive (policy) decisions rather than just throwing failed governments out. (b) That the category of person that runs for office, wins office, and maintains a revenue (donation) stream sufficient to stay in office is better than either a professional trained for life to fulfill that office, or taxpayer randomly selected to serve in that office. (b) That democracy is other than a slow road to totalitarianism as people use the state to create vast tragedies of the commons at national scale. (c) that people are ignorant of the fact that homogenous ethnocentric, nation states, under rule of law (juridical defense), governed by monarchies (judge of last resort), parliaments (approve or reject state requests for funds), elections (throw out the current ministers), and Juries (determine settlement in matters of dispute) are the optimum social can be improved upon, or that (d) it’s possible to have such a political order without a majority middle class population that like europe or china used systemic agrarian eugenics and criminal prosecution to limit the reproduction of the underclasses (unproductive), each member of which is six times as costly as the any member of the productive classes . People are stupid. Government doesn’t matter. Rule of law matters. Only Europeans created it. Because European law is not a choice, it is the natural law of tort (trespass) meaning that there is no law higher than it – even a god’s. As such Europe is and has been for 5000 years, a cult of the common law of tort. And until Rousseau invented political sophistry, and Kant philosophical sophistry, and Napoleon destroyed Europe and imposed continental law, we were all sovereign. Only the Americans remain. And only as long as european peoples rule themselves.
-
What Does Democracy Depend Upon?
Dec 26, 2019, 3:26 PM The absurd propositions that: (a) The people are capable of making positive (policy) decisions rather than just throwing failed governments out. (b) That the category of person that runs for office, wins office, and maintains a revenue (donation) stream sufficient to stay in office is better than either a professional trained for life to fulfill that office, or taxpayer randomly selected to serve in that office. (b) That democracy is other than a slow road to totalitarianism as people use the state to create vast tragedies of the commons at national scale. (c) that people are ignorant of the fact that homogenous ethnocentric, nation states, under rule of law (juridical defense), governed by monarchies (judge of last resort), parliaments (approve or reject state requests for funds), elections (throw out the current ministers), and Juries (determine settlement in matters of dispute) are the optimum social can be improved upon, or that (d) it’s possible to have such a political order without a majority middle class population that like europe or china used systemic agrarian eugenics and criminal prosecution to limit the reproduction of the underclasses (unproductive), each member of which is six times as costly as the any member of the productive classes . People are stupid. Government doesn’t matter. Rule of law matters. Only Europeans created it. Because European law is not a choice, it is the natural law of tort (trespass) meaning that there is no law higher than it – even a god’s. As such Europe is and has been for 5000 years, a cult of the common law of tort. And until Rousseau invented political sophistry, and Kant philosophical sophistry, and Napoleon destroyed Europe and imposed continental law, we were all sovereign. Only the Americans remain. And only as long as european peoples rule themselves.
-
Why Does Common Law Marriage Exist?
Dec 27, 2019, 5:34 PM Common law marriage is the origin of all marriage. The question is, why do church ceremonies, state marriages, and state licenses exist? Traditional european marriage required only both parties agree to it, but technically speaking, it was an agreement between families, not just the husband and wife. A marriage agreement (promise, contract) is not only between the husband and wife, between their families, but is insured by the polity. Meaning that if you interfered in a marriage you were liable for damages (Yes really). We are very comfortable today but it was not long ago that life was precarious and reciprocally insured each other, so a failed marriage ment that parental families would absorb costs they might not be able to carry. Marriage licenses began so that otherwise illegal marriages could be conducted. In the USA the puritans in Massachusetts began requiring them (I don’t know why) – most likely to maintain their version of eugenic mating which is an unspoken tenet of the protestant ethic. The present reason for marriage licenses, registrations, and ceremonies is the prevention of illegal marriages, and the resolution of property and inheritance disputes by the court now that we have enough wealth to worry about.
-
Why Does Common Law Marriage Exist?
Dec 27, 2019, 5:34 PM Common law marriage is the origin of all marriage. The question is, why do church ceremonies, state marriages, and state licenses exist? Traditional european marriage required only both parties agree to it, but technically speaking, it was an agreement between families, not just the husband and wife. A marriage agreement (promise, contract) is not only between the husband and wife, between their families, but is insured by the polity. Meaning that if you interfered in a marriage you were liable for damages (Yes really). We are very comfortable today but it was not long ago that life was precarious and reciprocally insured each other, so a failed marriage ment that parental families would absorb costs they might not be able to carry. Marriage licenses began so that otherwise illegal marriages could be conducted. In the USA the puritans in Massachusetts began requiring them (I don’t know why) – most likely to maintain their version of eugenic mating which is an unspoken tenet of the protestant ethic. The present reason for marriage licenses, registrations, and ceremonies is the prevention of illegal marriages, and the resolution of property and inheritance disputes by the court now that we have enough wealth to worry about.
-
Thoughts on Consciousness
Dec 28, 2019, 9:09 AM Consciousness is deterministic with scale, and biased by body form. Any being with sufficient neural capacity will develop similar intuitions and behaviors. Consciousness means modeling recursive future states by grammar of action. And we are programmed by action in reality. There is no mystery to consciousness. The nervous system is a lovely, profoundly simple thing, and there is trivial difference between a transistor and a soma, and the organization (adaptation) of the nervous system by dendritic wayfinding is indifferent from wiring circuit boards other than the infinite untraceable unmeasurable complexity of any given set of excitements. I am pretty confident of the structure of each major region of the brain and how it processes information, and there is no magic to recursive memory by thalamic preservation of state, and hippocampal production of indexes, and hippocampal rehearsal to store memories during break, rests, sleep. The experience of awareness is just a concert, like the experience of consciousness and it’s all just a constructed spectrum of preservation of networks. And anyone who has written an A* search for way-finding a maze can simply relabel variables and functions with brain regions and grasp the concept. Neural networks approximate that complexity, functions abstract that complexity, classes abstract that complexity further, but the underlying process is the same. Software must make address connections between simulated neurons and serially process calculations, while the brain only makes physical dendritic connections in infinite, inexhaustible, complexity and permutation. At present I dont know (maybe no one does) the provisioning of new episodic indices, and whether they are permanent or temporary. And the reason we can only produce robots at present is simply one of scale given the problem of serialization. I suspect we will solve that problem as evolution solved vision, which is to break the problem into pieces producing a symbolic input to a hierarchical system of prediction. I don’t see why we can’t do that other than the current cost would be ridiculous although it’s clear google is trying to use pre-processed information (search content) the way the financial business uses pre-processed information ( prices). I don’t know what they’re doing but as far as I know, it requires the development of symmetries (think, metaphysics) and a grammar (think thought, emotion, action) and a vocabulary to do that for the same reason humans needed language to think more deeply (system of measurement). Right now all I see is categorization (identification), and prediction and I don’t see anyone producing a metaphysics, grammar, and vocabulary bounded by similar rules to language, which will be necessary for machines to communicate because shared hierarchical memory would be slow (other than for the predator-prey division of labor), and protocols (languages) are necessary to encapsulate patterns such that access to (chaotic) underlying memory structures (neural networks and the training that got them to a given state) is unnecessary.
-
Thoughts on Consciousness
Dec 28, 2019, 9:09 AM Consciousness is deterministic with scale, and biased by body form. Any being with sufficient neural capacity will develop similar intuitions and behaviors. Consciousness means modeling recursive future states by grammar of action. And we are programmed by action in reality. There is no mystery to consciousness. The nervous system is a lovely, profoundly simple thing, and there is trivial difference between a transistor and a soma, and the organization (adaptation) of the nervous system by dendritic wayfinding is indifferent from wiring circuit boards other than the infinite untraceable unmeasurable complexity of any given set of excitements. I am pretty confident of the structure of each major region of the brain and how it processes information, and there is no magic to recursive memory by thalamic preservation of state, and hippocampal production of indexes, and hippocampal rehearsal to store memories during break, rests, sleep. The experience of awareness is just a concert, like the experience of consciousness and it’s all just a constructed spectrum of preservation of networks. And anyone who has written an A* search for way-finding a maze can simply relabel variables and functions with brain regions and grasp the concept. Neural networks approximate that complexity, functions abstract that complexity, classes abstract that complexity further, but the underlying process is the same. Software must make address connections between simulated neurons and serially process calculations, while the brain only makes physical dendritic connections in infinite, inexhaustible, complexity and permutation. At present I dont know (maybe no one does) the provisioning of new episodic indices, and whether they are permanent or temporary. And the reason we can only produce robots at present is simply one of scale given the problem of serialization. I suspect we will solve that problem as evolution solved vision, which is to break the problem into pieces producing a symbolic input to a hierarchical system of prediction. I don’t see why we can’t do that other than the current cost would be ridiculous although it’s clear google is trying to use pre-processed information (search content) the way the financial business uses pre-processed information ( prices). I don’t know what they’re doing but as far as I know, it requires the development of symmetries (think, metaphysics) and a grammar (think thought, emotion, action) and a vocabulary to do that for the same reason humans needed language to think more deeply (system of measurement). Right now all I see is categorization (identification), and prediction and I don’t see anyone producing a metaphysics, grammar, and vocabulary bounded by similar rules to language, which will be necessary for machines to communicate because shared hierarchical memory would be slow (other than for the predator-prey division of labor), and protocols (languages) are necessary to encapsulate patterns such that access to (chaotic) underlying memory structures (neural networks and the training that got them to a given state) is unnecessary.
-
Recreation of French Authoritarian Feminine Bureaucracy
Dec 28, 2019, 9:16 AM The EU is france’s attempt to recreate french authoritarian feminine bureaucracy, and is no different from the napoleonic vision. The reason france has been so far unsuccessful is the germans OWN europe commercially and financially. However, france has preserved a serious military – especially air and naval. Germany has none. So either greater germania is going to take charge or germania will be defeated by superior french arrogance from the west, and superior russian arrogance from the east. You cannot like anglos and germans fantasize about a christian world.. You must exercise masculine self confidence to survive.
-
Recreation of French Authoritarian Feminine Bureaucracy
Dec 28, 2019, 9:16 AM The EU is france’s attempt to recreate french authoritarian feminine bureaucracy, and is no different from the napoleonic vision. The reason france has been so far unsuccessful is the germans OWN europe commercially and financially. However, france has preserved a serious military – especially air and naval. Germany has none. So either greater germania is going to take charge or germania will be defeated by superior french arrogance from the west, and superior russian arrogance from the east. You cannot like anglos and germans fantasize about a christian world.. You must exercise masculine self confidence to survive.
-
Yes a Good Religion Is Possible – We Had Them
Dec 29, 2019, 1:33 PM I’m definitely anti theology, but not anti ‘religion’ in the ancient sense of myth(heroism, tragedy), ritual(sacrifice, debt payment), Oath, feast, sport, and festival, but in addition we require mindfulness as anonymity increases so the stoic-epicurean(science) vs buddhist (nonsense) methods are both superior to the semitic (self destructive). A ‘good’ religion is possible and the romans had just about developed it with Aryanism of homer (upper), Stoicism (upper middle, middle), epicureanism (lower middle), and sol invictus (lower) before the jews began their undermining. Today we know that aryanism of homer (aristocracy) is only available to those with agency, that stoicism was the proactive version of cognitive behavioral therapy and epicureanism the only means of true happiness for ordinary people, and that the underclasses desire escapism by false promise. We see buddhism tried to do all at once, and so did christianity judaism and islam – and all of them through falsehood. In usual european tradition, the market supplied class-religions of aryanism(homer,tragedy), stoicism, epicureanism, and sol invictus (brotherhoood) with christianity attractive mostly to women, slaves, immigrants and the underclasses. Just as Aristotelianism is attractive to our upper classes today, secular christianity our middle, and christianity our working, and islam our underclasses. The european solution to everything is markets that serve the interests of the classes but limited to preservation of cooperation between the classes by truth, duty, promise contract, rule of law of tort-property, and jury. In other words we mandate monopoly only on the material, legal, and political, and let people follow the ‘narrative’ that fits their agency. The problem is, that judaism and islam are both evolved to destroy that market of cooperation and restore authoritarianism and monopoly.