Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • Demarcation Between the Abrahamic Method and The Christian Method.

    Mar 9, 2020, 2:15 PM I think I am simply failing at demarcation between the abrahamic method and the christian method. Gods are good, religion is good, a church is a good thing, jesus said good things, but the bible is evil as hell compared to our founding literatures: the matter of greece and rome, the matter of france, the matter of germany, the matter of england, and the matter of america. These are heroic. But they are for the aristocracy (those with agency). There is no caretaker, no submission, no femininity to the western aristocratic religion. There is just TRAGEDY. Christians attempted to appropriate the western method of tragedy of achilles(upper class, masculine, hero) with jesus (underclass feminine victim) The process worked. It’s compatible. What’s not compatible is abrahamic method of ‘selling’ it. Why is it hard to say ‘jesus was right’. Instead of all the nonsense surrounding it?

    1. Stories of Gods (Parents) are the most-native(lowest cost, biologically available) language (grammar and logic ) usable by the intuition (pre-conscious), for assistance in decision making (choice) within the group strategy (method of organizing), such that frictions (threats, violations) are minimized, and retaliations are minimized, and opportunities for cooperation are maximized.

    2. There are no gods other than as narrative information, serving as a system of measurement, in our minds. There are hundreds of dead gods and dozens of living gods currently in the minds of men.

    3. There is no life after death other than as information in our minds, and the information we leave behind as conscious and preconscious effects on those around us, and the artifacts in the world around us – but these things do persist after death, and do continue to influence others – and in some cases for thousands of years.

    4. There is no heaven other than as in formation in our minds, it is merely the means by which we release the frustration of bearing the psychological costs of compromise and loss in competition, cooperation, and cohabitation, with others.

    5. The western tradition of ethnocentrism and heroism, sovereignty and reciprocity, truth and duty is the optimum adaptive order for human beings.(The optimum evolutionary strategy)

    6. Christian exhaustion of extension of kinship love to kith with forgiveness before retaliation, dispossession, or extermination, is the optimum means of increasing that adaptive velocity (the optimum prisoner’s dilemma strategy)

    7. Aristotelian realism, naturalism, operationalism, empiricism, logicism, and anglo-cooperativism-and-economicism is the optimum conceptual framework for rapid adaptation (optimum knowledge evolutionary strategy).

    8. The universe works by predictable rules we will continue to discover as the only possible organization of energy that will produce the three dimensions of mass and massless, gravity and pressure, space and time.

    9. But to tolerate all this adaptation, all of which requires stress on our thoughts, emotions, and bodies, we need mindfulness at the psychological (personal), sociological(interpersonal), and political (organizational) levels.

    10. Mindfulness can be provided through ritual which provides a calming effect on our computation, by a continuous positive feedback loop (tea ceremony, sacrifice); it can be provided by social construction of a narrative whether a truth or falsehood (mythology); it can be provided through harmonious group activity (oath, prayer, ritual, dance, sport, festival, feast).It can be provided through discipline ( the rituals of yoga, or of buddhist meditation, and withdrawal)….
      … Or mindfulness can be provided through deliberate training (the ritual of the stoic method of continuous self improvement or what we call ‘cognitive behavioral therapy’); it can be provided through epicurean knowledge and living, and aristotelian knowledge of the universe, and aristotelian history of man – a story more heroic than any envisioned in our myths. A story that Includes heroes such as Jesus and Achilles(Alexander).

    11. The reason for prohibiting a monotheistic religion is to prevent the use of retaliation by religious fundamentalists against the group – thereby undermining the civilization from within. Likewise the reason for a pagan religion – a pantheon of heroes, scientists, artists, and saints, is to prevent undermining a civilization from within.

    The truth is always simple. It’s the lies that make the world complicated. Edit

  • Demarcation Between the Abrahamic Method and The Christian Method.

    Mar 9, 2020, 2:15 PM I think I am simply failing at demarcation between the abrahamic method and the christian method. Gods are good, religion is good, a church is a good thing, jesus said good things, but the bible is evil as hell compared to our founding literatures: the matter of greece and rome, the matter of france, the matter of germany, the matter of england, and the matter of america. These are heroic. But they are for the aristocracy (those with agency). There is no caretaker, no submission, no femininity to the western aristocratic religion. There is just TRAGEDY. Christians attempted to appropriate the western method of tragedy of achilles(upper class, masculine, hero) with jesus (underclass feminine victim) The process worked. It’s compatible. What’s not compatible is abrahamic method of ‘selling’ it. Why is it hard to say ‘jesus was right’. Instead of all the nonsense surrounding it?

    1. Stories of Gods (Parents) are the most-native(lowest cost, biologically available) language (grammar and logic ) usable by the intuition (pre-conscious), for assistance in decision making (choice) within the group strategy (method of organizing), such that frictions (threats, violations) are minimized, and retaliations are minimized, and opportunities for cooperation are maximized.

    2. There are no gods other than as narrative information, serving as a system of measurement, in our minds. There are hundreds of dead gods and dozens of living gods currently in the minds of men.

    3. There is no life after death other than as information in our minds, and the information we leave behind as conscious and preconscious effects on those around us, and the artifacts in the world around us – but these things do persist after death, and do continue to influence others – and in some cases for thousands of years.

    4. There is no heaven other than as in formation in our minds, it is merely the means by which we release the frustration of bearing the psychological costs of compromise and loss in competition, cooperation, and cohabitation, with others.

    5. The western tradition of ethnocentrism and heroism, sovereignty and reciprocity, truth and duty is the optimum adaptive order for human beings.(The optimum evolutionary strategy)

    6. Christian exhaustion of extension of kinship love to kith with forgiveness before retaliation, dispossession, or extermination, is the optimum means of increasing that adaptive velocity (the optimum prisoner’s dilemma strategy)

    7. Aristotelian realism, naturalism, operationalism, empiricism, logicism, and anglo-cooperativism-and-economicism is the optimum conceptual framework for rapid adaptation (optimum knowledge evolutionary strategy).

    8. The universe works by predictable rules we will continue to discover as the only possible organization of energy that will produce the three dimensions of mass and massless, gravity and pressure, space and time.

    9. But to tolerate all this adaptation, all of which requires stress on our thoughts, emotions, and bodies, we need mindfulness at the psychological (personal), sociological(interpersonal), and political (organizational) levels.

    10. Mindfulness can be provided through ritual which provides a calming effect on our computation, by a continuous positive feedback loop (tea ceremony, sacrifice); it can be provided by social construction of a narrative whether a truth or falsehood (mythology); it can be provided through harmonious group activity (oath, prayer, ritual, dance, sport, festival, feast).It can be provided through discipline ( the rituals of yoga, or of buddhist meditation, and withdrawal)….
      … Or mindfulness can be provided through deliberate training (the ritual of the stoic method of continuous self improvement or what we call ‘cognitive behavioral therapy’); it can be provided through epicurean knowledge and living, and aristotelian knowledge of the universe, and aristotelian history of man – a story more heroic than any envisioned in our myths. A story that Includes heroes such as Jesus and Achilles(Alexander).

    11. The reason for prohibiting a monotheistic religion is to prevent the use of retaliation by religious fundamentalists against the group – thereby undermining the civilization from within. Likewise the reason for a pagan religion – a pantheon of heroes, scientists, artists, and saints, is to prevent undermining a civilization from within.

    The truth is always simple. It’s the lies that make the world complicated. Edit

  • Two Topics. Constitutionality, Taxation Methods

    —“Is not the graduated income tax (communist manifesto) that is dysgenic? Also worth noting: the Supreme Court in Pollack v. Farmers Loan Trust Co. in 1895 ruled the income tax unconstitutional.”—Scott De Warren

    I. Constitutionality of the Income tax. … 1. the court did its job by correctly ruling that according to the constitution, the federal government could not enact any tax that was not apportioned to the states by population (a flat tax). … 2. The constitution did it’s job correctly by forcing the legislature to pass a constitutional amendment permitting the income tax. … 3. The legislature did its job correctly by passing a constitutional amendment through the amendment process. … 4. The states did their jobs by passing the constitutional amendment through the amendment process. I do not see the problem with the income tax per se, but with the amount of it, and the uses that it was put to. So the income tax is a slippery slope. The answer to the slippery slope is quite simple – if it redistributes reproduction downward it’s bad. If it constrains reproduction its bad. But that was exactly what the communists wanted – underclass paradise parasitic extraction from the meritocratic classes thereby reversing the benefits of thousands of years of eugenic practices by our ancestors. II. Taxes … 1. a graduated income tax is fine if it’s outside the reproductive cost curve. In other words, if it doesn’t affect reproduction. … 2. A flat tax regulates taxation best by keeping it low … 3. Fees rather than taxes eliminate discretion. … 4. Direct economic voting controls the misuse of fees. … 5. This combination of taxes forces the construction of voluntary commons (civil society). a. Commons are by nature always redistributive (flat fees). b. Income Taxes are by nature redistributive of benefits. c. Flat taxes by their nature redistribute burden. d. Fees by nature meritocratic. The answer is fees. Keeping an account of all inputs and outputs per person would provide evidence necessary for policy. Having each generation pay for the rearing of their children, and children paying for the retirement and care of their parents creates eugenic incentives. Ending false-education and credit-financialization so you (a) pay for children when young, (b) save when mature, (c) are independent when aged, and (d) insured by your children, (e) passed on your inheritance to them in toto as compensation, would restore the intergenerational system of building healthy families of sufficient size and restoring long term thinking to the polity, rather than all this short term consumer consumptionism. There is a reason that the left suppresses data collection that would show white men > 35 and < 65 support the entirety of the population, and that women consume 70% of resources, and spend 70% of income such that this is an incredibly unequal system of benefits in favor of women. The P-Constitution does all this.

  • Two Topics. Constitutionality, Taxation Methods

    —“Is not the graduated income tax (communist manifesto) that is dysgenic? Also worth noting: the Supreme Court in Pollack v. Farmers Loan Trust Co. in 1895 ruled the income tax unconstitutional.”—Scott De Warren

    I. Constitutionality of the Income tax. … 1. the court did its job by correctly ruling that according to the constitution, the federal government could not enact any tax that was not apportioned to the states by population (a flat tax). … 2. The constitution did it’s job correctly by forcing the legislature to pass a constitutional amendment permitting the income tax. … 3. The legislature did its job correctly by passing a constitutional amendment through the amendment process. … 4. The states did their jobs by passing the constitutional amendment through the amendment process. I do not see the problem with the income tax per se, but with the amount of it, and the uses that it was put to. So the income tax is a slippery slope. The answer to the slippery slope is quite simple – if it redistributes reproduction downward it’s bad. If it constrains reproduction its bad. But that was exactly what the communists wanted – underclass paradise parasitic extraction from the meritocratic classes thereby reversing the benefits of thousands of years of eugenic practices by our ancestors. II. Taxes … 1. a graduated income tax is fine if it’s outside the reproductive cost curve. In other words, if it doesn’t affect reproduction. … 2. A flat tax regulates taxation best by keeping it low … 3. Fees rather than taxes eliminate discretion. … 4. Direct economic voting controls the misuse of fees. … 5. This combination of taxes forces the construction of voluntary commons (civil society). a. Commons are by nature always redistributive (flat fees). b. Income Taxes are by nature redistributive of benefits. c. Flat taxes by their nature redistribute burden. d. Fees by nature meritocratic. The answer is fees. Keeping an account of all inputs and outputs per person would provide evidence necessary for policy. Having each generation pay for the rearing of their children, and children paying for the retirement and care of their parents creates eugenic incentives. Ending false-education and credit-financialization so you (a) pay for children when young, (b) save when mature, (c) are independent when aged, and (d) insured by your children, (e) passed on your inheritance to them in toto as compensation, would restore the intergenerational system of building healthy families of sufficient size and restoring long term thinking to the polity, rather than all this short term consumer consumptionism. There is a reason that the left suppresses data collection that would show white men > 35 and < 65 support the entirety of the population, and that women consume 70% of resources, and spend 70% of income such that this is an incredibly unequal system of benefits in favor of women. The P-Constitution does all this.

  • Why Does the Left Have to Lie and Deny Differences?

    Mar 10, 2020, 10:54 PM The Left= Female Conflict Strategy: Deny, Avoid, Substitute Approval for Truth, Justify, Use Sophistry, Ad Hominem(gsrrm), Rally, Undermine, Strawman, Bait Into Conflict, Bait Into Hazard, Free Ride, Rent Seek, Hyperconsumption, Hypergamy, “Unconscious: The Men Will Take Care of It” The left has to lie. WHY? The suite of programs we have seen in marxism, communism, socialism, Neo-Marxism(cultural marxism), postmodernism, feminism, hbd-denialism(political correctness) are an attempt to undermine every single system of class and gender harmony in tripartite western civilization from within by the false promise of freedom from evolutionary pressures (Darwin), under the pretense that admittedly meritocratic and eugenic western civlization oppressed rather than incrementally domesticated ourselves. And that this strategy – the cause of our successes – is antithetical to the female reproductive strategy, female cognition, and the female group strategy of intellectuals behind marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and HBD-Denialism. We enfranchised this hostile intellectual group, and women at roughly the same time, and gave elites at practicing the female group strategy, and an audience of easily deceived newly enfranchised females, on top of our traditional underclasses, a market to ply with 51% of the vote, 70% of consumption of government services, and 70% of consumer spending. And we did not give them time to integrate into the franchise, rule of law, meritocracy, and to absorb the shock, before the postwar campaign to undermine western civlization through them. Marxism, postmodernism, feminism together are just a repeated of judaism, christianity islam to undermine the aristocratic empires of the ancient world. And we saw the loss of the arts, letters, culture, civilization and genomes of five great civilizations civilization reduced to dysgenia, decline, regression, ignorance, and superstition. The female group conflict strategy? ie: bait others into conflict. 1. Feminine Undermining: Interpersonal and Social Superpredators 2. Female advocacy strategy: “heaping undue praise”, give everyone a prize, giving false compliments. 3. Female Conflict Strategy: disapproval, shaming, ridicule, rallying, gossiping, straw manning, and reputation destruction without end (destruction). 4. Female anti-social behavior: promiscuity, impulsivity, drugs, alcohol, lying, needling, conflict generation, attention seeking, shrilling, outraging. 5. Female Technique: Seduction: False Promise, Baiting Into Hazard. —“Using False Promise, Baiting Into Hazard, Advocated by Pilpul, Defended by Critique, Escaping Liability and Warranty; By Pretense of Plausible Deniability; Despite Deliberate Avoidance of Due Diligence, And Deliberate Evasion of Warranty, Deliberate Escape From Liability, Given the Asymmetry of Knowledge, the Presence of Malincentives by both Agent(s) and Victim(s); And Pursued for the Purpose of Attention, Reward (profit), Influence(power), And Undermining (Power), of the Trust and Cooperation, of a Population in Normal Distribution, Thereby Generating accelerating Cycles of Internal Conflict, And Generating Demand for Authority to Control by the Hazard Maker.”— False promise of freedom from low status and agency. False promise of ability to rule and develop agency. Destruction of civlization culture, arts, knowledge, traditions. The repeat of the christian destruction of the ancient world. Through women and slaves in the old world. Through women and immigrants in the new world. If not for immigrants we would have defeated them. Democracy by 92 Intelligence differences by 99 Gender differences by 12 Group differences in 19 Science would have won. They won by the immigration act. Not by ideas. The romans were too tolerant. So are we. The only way to defeat a social superpredator is with a physical superpredator.

  • Why Does the Left Have to Lie and Deny Differences?

    Mar 10, 2020, 10:54 PM The Left= Female Conflict Strategy: Deny, Avoid, Substitute Approval for Truth, Justify, Use Sophistry, Ad Hominem(gsrrm), Rally, Undermine, Strawman, Bait Into Conflict, Bait Into Hazard, Free Ride, Rent Seek, Hyperconsumption, Hypergamy, “Unconscious: The Men Will Take Care of It” The left has to lie. WHY? The suite of programs we have seen in marxism, communism, socialism, Neo-Marxism(cultural marxism), postmodernism, feminism, hbd-denialism(political correctness) are an attempt to undermine every single system of class and gender harmony in tripartite western civilization from within by the false promise of freedom from evolutionary pressures (Darwin), under the pretense that admittedly meritocratic and eugenic western civlization oppressed rather than incrementally domesticated ourselves. And that this strategy – the cause of our successes – is antithetical to the female reproductive strategy, female cognition, and the female group strategy of intellectuals behind marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and HBD-Denialism. We enfranchised this hostile intellectual group, and women at roughly the same time, and gave elites at practicing the female group strategy, and an audience of easily deceived newly enfranchised females, on top of our traditional underclasses, a market to ply with 51% of the vote, 70% of consumption of government services, and 70% of consumer spending. And we did not give them time to integrate into the franchise, rule of law, meritocracy, and to absorb the shock, before the postwar campaign to undermine western civlization through them. Marxism, postmodernism, feminism together are just a repeated of judaism, christianity islam to undermine the aristocratic empires of the ancient world. And we saw the loss of the arts, letters, culture, civilization and genomes of five great civilizations civilization reduced to dysgenia, decline, regression, ignorance, and superstition. The female group conflict strategy? ie: bait others into conflict. 1. Feminine Undermining: Interpersonal and Social Superpredators 2. Female advocacy strategy: “heaping undue praise”, give everyone a prize, giving false compliments. 3. Female Conflict Strategy: disapproval, shaming, ridicule, rallying, gossiping, straw manning, and reputation destruction without end (destruction). 4. Female anti-social behavior: promiscuity, impulsivity, drugs, alcohol, lying, needling, conflict generation, attention seeking, shrilling, outraging. 5. Female Technique: Seduction: False Promise, Baiting Into Hazard. —“Using False Promise, Baiting Into Hazard, Advocated by Pilpul, Defended by Critique, Escaping Liability and Warranty; By Pretense of Plausible Deniability; Despite Deliberate Avoidance of Due Diligence, And Deliberate Evasion of Warranty, Deliberate Escape From Liability, Given the Asymmetry of Knowledge, the Presence of Malincentives by both Agent(s) and Victim(s); And Pursued for the Purpose of Attention, Reward (profit), Influence(power), And Undermining (Power), of the Trust and Cooperation, of a Population in Normal Distribution, Thereby Generating accelerating Cycles of Internal Conflict, And Generating Demand for Authority to Control by the Hazard Maker.”— False promise of freedom from low status and agency. False promise of ability to rule and develop agency. Destruction of civlization culture, arts, knowledge, traditions. The repeat of the christian destruction of the ancient world. Through women and slaves in the old world. Through women and immigrants in the new world. If not for immigrants we would have defeated them. Democracy by 92 Intelligence differences by 99 Gender differences by 12 Group differences in 19 Science would have won. They won by the immigration act. Not by ideas. The romans were too tolerant. So are we. The only way to defeat a social superpredator is with a physical superpredator.

  • The Need for Average Ability

    Mar 11, 2020, 8:19 AM Work it backwards. If you want a pareto distribution (20% professional) you want an average IQ of around 112-115 at present levels of technology. Conversely we can’t shift too much farther until we determine how to limit eccentricities (defects) above 140’s. My intuition is that those defects are due to the fact of simply being outliers during development. But it could be that higher investment parenting is necessary.

    —“A drop of 6 points in the average IQ of a population can have very significant effects. In the US an IQ of 115 is about the minimum required for professionals such as engineers, doctors, lawyers etc. This is about 16% of a population with average IQ 100 but only about 8% of a population with an average IQ of 94. The decline in the really high IQ “smart fraction” would be even greater. On the other hand Linda Gottfredson has stated that in the current US economy a person with an IQ below 75 is essentially useless. That is about 5% of a population with an average IQ of 100 but about 10% of a population with an average IQ of 94. So a reduction in IQ has a “double whammy” diminishing the highly productive proportion of the population and increasing the economically useless proportion. I doubt that a population with an average IQ of 94 would have much chance of being a really First World nation. The difference between the IQ of say Turkey and the countries of Northwest Europe is roughly six points or maybe a little more.”— Jim

  • The Need for Average Ability

    Mar 11, 2020, 8:19 AM Work it backwards. If you want a pareto distribution (20% professional) you want an average IQ of around 112-115 at present levels of technology. Conversely we can’t shift too much farther until we determine how to limit eccentricities (defects) above 140’s. My intuition is that those defects are due to the fact of simply being outliers during development. But it could be that higher investment parenting is necessary.

    —“A drop of 6 points in the average IQ of a population can have very significant effects. In the US an IQ of 115 is about the minimum required for professionals such as engineers, doctors, lawyers etc. This is about 16% of a population with average IQ 100 but only about 8% of a population with an average IQ of 94. The decline in the really high IQ “smart fraction” would be even greater. On the other hand Linda Gottfredson has stated that in the current US economy a person with an IQ below 75 is essentially useless. That is about 5% of a population with an average IQ of 100 but about 10% of a population with an average IQ of 94. So a reduction in IQ has a “double whammy” diminishing the highly productive proportion of the population and increasing the economically useless proportion. I doubt that a population with an average IQ of 94 would have much chance of being a really First World nation. The difference between the IQ of say Turkey and the countries of Northwest Europe is roughly six points or maybe a little more.”— Jim

  • Wisdom – Our Strategy Going Forward

    Mar 11, 2020, 3:09 PM by Luke Weinhagen This is the approach to take moving forward. We are in open debate here, all the time, on every issue we can think of. All are welcome to join. We do not need to pursue “debate” with anyone. We are engaged very intentionally in perpetual “Public Disputation”. Our pamphlets are freely available and our polemic on any topic is available for all to see. At this point we are better served by extending invites than we are by starting fights.

  • Wisdom – Our Strategy Going Forward

    Mar 11, 2020, 3:09 PM by Luke Weinhagen This is the approach to take moving forward. We are in open debate here, all the time, on every issue we can think of. All are welcome to join. We do not need to pursue “debate” with anyone. We are engaged very intentionally in perpetual “Public Disputation”. Our pamphlets are freely available and our polemic on any topic is available for all to see. At this point we are better served by extending invites than we are by starting fights.