Form: Mini Essay

  • What Price of The Conditions We Sacrificed?

    Dec 23, 2019, 8:18 PM Sovereignty demands Reciprocity, where demand for Reciprocity includes all demonstrated interests, whether bodily, family, physical, normative, traditional, informational, or the civic and political institutions that defend them. Westerners produce commons that other people cannot produce, and we do by NOT DOING evil: lying, misleading, cheating, stealing, free riding, corruption, as much as what we DO: Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, Heroism. So economists (all of whom are leftists) only measure individual consumer goods, not the production of commons: truth, honesty, integrity, contract, quality, civility, responsibility – which is what makes western civilization unique. What is the price of the norm of truth before face? What is the price of commons before self? What is the price of quiet public places, parks and forests without fear, lockless doors, the intergenerational nuclear family, and family income provided by only one spouse? … … our entrepreneurship, our technology, our medicine? That price is self-denial, the most important of which is soft eugenics: limiting reproduction to that which one can support while producing offspring likewise capable of support without parasitism upon others.

  • Our Version of The Socratic Method: Competition

    Dec 23, 2019, 8:19 PM (I’m about finished with the propertarian project although there are always nuances to work with, but this is worth repeating.) KING OF THE HILL GAMES I teach by creating games that men will compete in. This is how men are best taught. Instead of asking questions I start arguments. Instead of preaching an angle, I attack a proposition and force others to defend it. Instead of assuming equality I play king of the hill and bait them into attacking me. Instead of writing essays of appeal I write arguments to criticize. BAIT MEN INTO DOMINANCE PLAY. Teaching men is really easy: Bait them into dominance play. Just as exhaustive forgiveness in tit-for-tat is the optimum cooperative strategy, exhaustive baiting for dominance play is the optimum MALE cooperative strategy. Set up King of the Hill games where ANY forward progress gets the men recognition. Do not criticize failure, only cowardice, attention seeking, or time wasting. If you are too predictable you will ruin the game. You must present a variety of challenges. We cannot feel ‘good’ about learning by conformity the way girls and women do. We must play at fighting or it’s not worth our time. AN EXPERIMENTAL CLASSROOM: KING OF THE HILL GAME: TEACHING MEN I have developed the “King of the Hill” strategy of discourse (teaching) because it is actually THE BEST method of teaching (masculine) men. Iâ��ve been doing this since we used 300 baud dial up modems and 80 character monochrome screens. And I learned it early. Men can attack me and my ideas, without acting vulnerable, or submissive, or begging for attention, but by exercising their dominance. And they can fail and no one cares. This is actually the optimum method of reaching men: we create a dominance game of low risk. We learn from playing this dominance game. The secret is to reward dominance expression if itâ��s backed by insight, argument, or wit. And to stop on effeminate, abrahamic, and non-argument. I make serious arguments to teach. I make half arguments to encourage debate. And I push controversial ideas to encourage them to refute them. My role in this game is to play king of the hill, and say “come get me”. I provide symbolic rewards (sharing quotes), and meaningful rewards (investing time in those with potential), and lifetime rewards (skill development). That is why this game works. Not everyone can play this game. But if they can play this game, and get good at it they will master a very special skill. And it’s that collection of talent I’m interested in creating. The internet does change. Men donâ��t change. The number of stupid men with access to digital discourse simply increases. The internet of such men requires street fighting, and I try to create a locker room for street fighters. In that locker room we play king of the hill. WE PUT DOMINANCE PLAY TO CONSTRUCTIVE USE. If you want beta-and-chick-friendly theatre watch TED videos. It’s a cult of pseudoscience. I teach argument.. I teach men. (And the occasional woman with character, intellectual honesty, and brains.) You might not realize I know this is a game, and that we are playing a game until you meet me in person or talk to me in an interview â�� because Iâ��m not very much like my online persona. This is educational entertainment and theatre. I DON’T DO HATE I’m pro natural law; pro my people; pro humanity; and pro transcendence; Yes, I will dig on genetic differences, biological differences, genetic differences, cultural differences, class, gender, and racial differences. Yes I will make objective analysis of the those differences. I will work to destroy the cherished lies of every race, civilization, culture, nation, tribe, and class. And I will crush those lies with some sense of both desperation, conviction and joy. But I don’t do racism. I hate on parasitism predation, and fictionalism to justify it. But I don’t hate on people. I fault my people for not using their superiority to defend against the group evolutionary strategies of other groups. I fault my people for failing to rule and rule well. I fault my people for intellectual folly and dishonesty. I advocate nationalism, tribalism, sovereignty and natural law of reciprocity and markets in everything for all human beings. And as many nations as it takes to transcend all humans through the gradual improvement of all and the gradual reduction of the underclasses that prohibit our transcendence. I don’t like hating on people. It’s not Christian and therefore not European. And not even Aryan. The beauty of christianity is that it seeks to extirpate all hatred from the human heart. And once extirpated we are free to use reason, with clear minds and clear judgement. I have no problem with war, murder, violence and destruction. i have no problem with rule, punishment, and if necessary incarceration or enslavement. I have a problem with hatred. A problem with deception. And a problem with any order other than the laws of nature, the natural law of reciprocity, and the transcendence of man. Edit

  • Our Version of The Socratic Method: Competition

    Dec 23, 2019, 8:19 PM (I’m about finished with the propertarian project although there are always nuances to work with, but this is worth repeating.) KING OF THE HILL GAMES I teach by creating games that men will compete in. This is how men are best taught. Instead of asking questions I start arguments. Instead of preaching an angle, I attack a proposition and force others to defend it. Instead of assuming equality I play king of the hill and bait them into attacking me. Instead of writing essays of appeal I write arguments to criticize. BAIT MEN INTO DOMINANCE PLAY. Teaching men is really easy: Bait them into dominance play. Just as exhaustive forgiveness in tit-for-tat is the optimum cooperative strategy, exhaustive baiting for dominance play is the optimum MALE cooperative strategy. Set up King of the Hill games where ANY forward progress gets the men recognition. Do not criticize failure, only cowardice, attention seeking, or time wasting. If you are too predictable you will ruin the game. You must present a variety of challenges. We cannot feel ‘good’ about learning by conformity the way girls and women do. We must play at fighting or it’s not worth our time. AN EXPERIMENTAL CLASSROOM: KING OF THE HILL GAME: TEACHING MEN I have developed the “King of the Hill” strategy of discourse (teaching) because it is actually THE BEST method of teaching (masculine) men. Iâ��ve been doing this since we used 300 baud dial up modems and 80 character monochrome screens. And I learned it early. Men can attack me and my ideas, without acting vulnerable, or submissive, or begging for attention, but by exercising their dominance. And they can fail and no one cares. This is actually the optimum method of reaching men: we create a dominance game of low risk. We learn from playing this dominance game. The secret is to reward dominance expression if itâ��s backed by insight, argument, or wit. And to stop on effeminate, abrahamic, and non-argument. I make serious arguments to teach. I make half arguments to encourage debate. And I push controversial ideas to encourage them to refute them. My role in this game is to play king of the hill, and say “come get me”. I provide symbolic rewards (sharing quotes), and meaningful rewards (investing time in those with potential), and lifetime rewards (skill development). That is why this game works. Not everyone can play this game. But if they can play this game, and get good at it they will master a very special skill. And it’s that collection of talent I’m interested in creating. The internet does change. Men donâ��t change. The number of stupid men with access to digital discourse simply increases. The internet of such men requires street fighting, and I try to create a locker room for street fighters. In that locker room we play king of the hill. WE PUT DOMINANCE PLAY TO CONSTRUCTIVE USE. If you want beta-and-chick-friendly theatre watch TED videos. It’s a cult of pseudoscience. I teach argument.. I teach men. (And the occasional woman with character, intellectual honesty, and brains.) You might not realize I know this is a game, and that we are playing a game until you meet me in person or talk to me in an interview â�� because Iâ��m not very much like my online persona. This is educational entertainment and theatre. I DON’T DO HATE I’m pro natural law; pro my people; pro humanity; and pro transcendence; Yes, I will dig on genetic differences, biological differences, genetic differences, cultural differences, class, gender, and racial differences. Yes I will make objective analysis of the those differences. I will work to destroy the cherished lies of every race, civilization, culture, nation, tribe, and class. And I will crush those lies with some sense of both desperation, conviction and joy. But I don’t do racism. I hate on parasitism predation, and fictionalism to justify it. But I don’t hate on people. I fault my people for not using their superiority to defend against the group evolutionary strategies of other groups. I fault my people for failing to rule and rule well. I fault my people for intellectual folly and dishonesty. I advocate nationalism, tribalism, sovereignty and natural law of reciprocity and markets in everything for all human beings. And as many nations as it takes to transcend all humans through the gradual improvement of all and the gradual reduction of the underclasses that prohibit our transcendence. I don’t like hating on people. It’s not Christian and therefore not European. And not even Aryan. The beauty of christianity is that it seeks to extirpate all hatred from the human heart. And once extirpated we are free to use reason, with clear minds and clear judgement. I have no problem with war, murder, violence and destruction. i have no problem with rule, punishment, and if necessary incarceration or enslavement. I have a problem with hatred. A problem with deception. And a problem with any order other than the laws of nature, the natural law of reciprocity, and the transcendence of man. Edit

  • Creators of The Second Abrahamic Dark Age

    Dec 24, 2019, 10:20 AM Once you understand P, and especially the Abrahamic method of deceit, you rapidly understand that Freudians, Boasians, Marxists, The French Academy, Postmodernists, Feminists are all telling the same lie, to achieve the same destruction of the modern world as they did the ancient world.

    (Event: Revolt against the end of theology and man centered-universe, revolt against the modern world)

    1. PSEUDOMATHEMATICS: Cantor, Bohr, Feynman, and yes, even Einstein.
    2. PSEUDOSCIENTISTS: Freud, Boas, Marx, Gould, and now, unfortunately, Pinker (for not explaining shift in violence)
    3. CONQUERORS: Lenin – Trotsky – Mao – Tito
      (Event: Failure of Revolution, Failure of Class Warfare by Economic Means)
    4. SOPHISTS (NEO-MARXISTS): Morris – Bebel -Bernstein – De Leon – Kautsky – Debs – Hardie – Plekhanov – Zetkin – Gorky – Connolly – Luxemburg – Liebknecht – Kollontai – Pannekoek – Stalin – Borochov – Korsch – Benjamin – Ibarruri – Reich – Aragon – Brecht – Lefebvre – Sartre – Rubel – Beauvoir – Allende – Dunayevskaya – Mills – Hobsbawm – Althusser – Pasolini – Zinn – Miliband – Bauman – Guevara – Castro – Debord – Harvey – Wolff – Eagleton – Zizek- McDonnell – West – Varoufakis
    5. PSEUDO-LAW: Kelsen – Dworkin – Hartt (legal Sophistry, Jewish Pilpul)
    6. PSEUDO-ECONOMICS: Krugman – Stigliz – Piketty – Keynes
      (Event: Attempt at pseudomathematical economics of cherry-picking consumption – feminine marxist income statement vs masculine european balance sheet economics.)
    7. CULTURAL MARXISTS  Adorno, Marcuse, Horkheimer, Benjamin, Fromm, Habermas, Pollock Löwenthal Schmidt Honneth Kraucer Kirchheimer
      (Event: Attempt to undermine culture of modernity )
    8. LINQUISTIC SOPHISTS: Ludwig Wittgenstein, Ferdinand de Saussure, George Herbert Mead, Noam Chomsky, Hans-Georg Gadamer, Roland Barthes.
    9. POSTMODERN SOPHISTS: Jacques Derrida , Foucault, Baudrillard, György Lukács, Antonio Gramsci
      (Event: Attempt to undermine, truth, argument, and language as measurement)
    10. ANTI MALE FEMINISTS: Friedan – Steinem
    11. ANTI NATIONIST NEOCONS: Trotsky-Strauss-Kristol
    12. LIBERTARIANS: Rand, Rothbard, and to a lesser extent Hoppe
    13. CONQUEST, DE NATIONALIZATION: Popper’s “Open Society” and Soros’ money.
  • Creators of The Second Abrahamic Dark Age

    Dec 24, 2019, 10:20 AM Once you understand P, and especially the Abrahamic method of deceit, you rapidly understand that Freudians, Boasians, Marxists, The French Academy, Postmodernists, Feminists are all telling the same lie, to achieve the same destruction of the modern world as they did the ancient world.

    (Event: Revolt against the end of theology and man centered-universe, revolt against the modern world)

    1. PSEUDOMATHEMATICS: Cantor, Bohr, Feynman, and yes, even Einstein.
    2. PSEUDOSCIENTISTS: Freud, Boas, Marx, Gould, and now, unfortunately, Pinker (for not explaining shift in violence)
    3. CONQUERORS: Lenin – Trotsky – Mao – Tito
      (Event: Failure of Revolution, Failure of Class Warfare by Economic Means)
    4. SOPHISTS (NEO-MARXISTS): Morris – Bebel -Bernstein – De Leon – Kautsky – Debs – Hardie – Plekhanov – Zetkin – Gorky – Connolly – Luxemburg – Liebknecht – Kollontai – Pannekoek – Stalin – Borochov – Korsch – Benjamin – Ibarruri – Reich – Aragon – Brecht – Lefebvre – Sartre – Rubel – Beauvoir – Allende – Dunayevskaya – Mills – Hobsbawm – Althusser – Pasolini – Zinn – Miliband – Bauman – Guevara – Castro – Debord – Harvey – Wolff – Eagleton – Zizek- McDonnell – West – Varoufakis
    5. PSEUDO-LAW: Kelsen – Dworkin – Hartt (legal Sophistry, Jewish Pilpul)
    6. PSEUDO-ECONOMICS: Krugman – Stigliz – Piketty – Keynes
      (Event: Attempt at pseudomathematical economics of cherry-picking consumption – feminine marxist income statement vs masculine european balance sheet economics.)
    7. CULTURAL MARXISTS  Adorno, Marcuse, Horkheimer, Benjamin, Fromm, Habermas, Pollock Löwenthal Schmidt Honneth Kraucer Kirchheimer
      (Event: Attempt to undermine culture of modernity )
    8. LINQUISTIC SOPHISTS: Ludwig Wittgenstein, Ferdinand de Saussure, George Herbert Mead, Noam Chomsky, Hans-Georg Gadamer, Roland Barthes.
    9. POSTMODERN SOPHISTS: Jacques Derrida , Foucault, Baudrillard, György Lukács, Antonio Gramsci
      (Event: Attempt to undermine, truth, argument, and language as measurement)
    10. ANTI MALE FEMINISTS: Friedan – Steinem
    11. ANTI NATIONIST NEOCONS: Trotsky-Strauss-Kristol
    12. LIBERTARIANS: Rand, Rothbard, and to a lesser extent Hoppe
    13. CONQUEST, DE NATIONALIZATION: Popper’s “Open Society” and Soros’ money.
  • Being Anti-Abrahamic

    Being anti-abrahamic is like being anti-marxist, or anti islam. It’s not being anti-genetics. I’m not anti-anyone who pursues reciprocity. And even then, reciprocity is enforceable under the law by natural incentives. Sure, I want to live in a homogenous polity because it’s the optimum condition for people who love high trust commons, and love to benefit from them and contribute to them. We are hunters and our territory matters. On the other hand if you’ll fight for Truth, Excellence, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, with me then we are still relations.

  • Being Anti-Abrahamic

    Being anti-abrahamic is like being anti-marxist, or anti islam. It’s not being anti-genetics. I’m not anti-anyone who pursues reciprocity. And even then, reciprocity is enforceable under the law by natural incentives. Sure, I want to live in a homogenous polity because it’s the optimum condition for people who love high trust commons, and love to benefit from them and contribute to them. We are hunters and our territory matters. On the other hand if you’ll fight for Truth, Excellence, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, with me then we are still relations.

  • Prewar We Had Done to Europe What China Has Recently Done to Us.

    Dec 25, 2019, 7:37 PM Panic of 1901, a U.S. economic recession that started a fight for financial control of the Northern Pacific Railway Panic of 1907, a U.S. economic recession with bank failures In 1913 we formed the federal reserve. The 19-teens. Visions of Big government danced in their heads. Fiat currency catastrophe begins. The USA becomes a world creditor because of the wars. Depression of 1920-21, a U.S. economic recession following the end of WW1 Roaring 20’s give us Electrification and the Automobile which are the primary drivers of the 20th century. Wall Street Crash of 1929 and Great Depression (1929–1939) the worst depression of modern history 1930’s the Lost Decade of the Great Depression. FDR’s failures at socialism, that end up without result. WW1 and WW2 were financed by high taxation. Restores the economy. Big government at home, becomes big government worldwide as the USA tries to ‘teach the world a lesson’. See the pattern yet? We survived WW2 but the industrialized world was trashed, and the developing world was taking on communism (effectively slave labor). 1950’s were a quiet boom, the height of fashion, family, masculinity and mass migration into home ownership and the middle class. By 1960 it was clear communism couldn’t function. This led to intellectual postmodernism (what we call political correctness – pseudoscience, pseudomathematics, sophistry and denialism) By the mid 1960’s the world had recovered. In 1964 we implement the immigration act designed to flood the country with underclass labor that would drive down the price of labor, and destroy the american experiment of a nation ‘of people of character’ (meaning a middle class nation state). The 1960’s ended the feeling of certainty. Why? The counter culture and media, and the assault on our civilization. Everything goes wrong here. Everything. By 1970 it was clear that unions had run up costs during a period of recovery that could not be paid. Nixon’s was in the right doing it wrong. He’s gone. Vietnam ends. Cold war is at its height. In 1973 we had the oil crisis that crashed our economy. By the mid 70’s only a minority of college educated graduates would find jobs. Gasoline went from .25 a gallon to over $1.00 Secondary banking crisis of 1973–1975 in the UK Latin American debt crisis (late 1970s, early 1980s) known as “lost decade” The automotive industry collapsed, as it tried to convert from making poor quality, heavy cars, to those that could operate By 1976 we understood that Johnson’s Great society project to imitate the soviets had failed and all we had done was destroy black families, the black middle class, and great vast ghettos in urban areas that would bankrupt our cities. In 77 we had star wars and” something changed” – the tech revolution was starting. (I built my first computer). In 1979 we had the second oil crisis. We were tired of ‘losing’ more and more year after year. The seventies ended the postwar economy and with it the socialists and communists’ dreams. In 1980 we elected reagan. He and thatcher ended the postwar social fantasy that soviet or social democratic economics were possible. in 1980 and 1982 we had two recessions. In the 1980s we had the savings and loan crisis. Reagan’s strategy was to bankrupt the soviets and the chinese. It worked. It worked at the cost of debt. Black Monday in 1987 1992 Soviet Collapse results in 1990’s peace dividend, and the roaring 90’s. client server peaks. Internet era starts, cell phone era starts. Dot-com bubble (2000-2002) (US) and… wow. Uncertainty returns. The 1980-2000 period like the teens and twenties, and like the 50’s is a high period for america. 2007-2009 Financial Crisis 2010’s the Lost Decade of World Financial Exhaustion. Late 20-teens america begins ending the postwar order and returning to the world balance of powers, now that technology and power have been equilibrated by the rest of the world ‘catching up’ and americans ‘falling behind’. Do I need to give a lesson to you on the economics of of the late 19th – early 21st century? America was artificially wealthy for (a) conquering a continent, (b) buying the rest from napoleon for cheap, (c) selling it off to ethnic europeans (largely germans) who were genetically middle class and land- constrained (c) using fiat currency to finance the immigration of through the 20’s, (d) inheriting the british empire and replacing london as the world currency, (e) using our resources to fund the world’s recovery (f) and the war against world communism (g) and the war against world islamism that has replaced it. But the world has caught up and we have immigrated the underclasses our ancestors sought to avoid -because they create demand for parasitic redistribution, and authoritarian government, because they are not genetically middle class. We no longer have 400 years of northern european institutional, technological, knowledge, cultural and genetic advantage. Meanwhile the destruction of the family, the substitution of INTEREST for TAXATION, and the decline in reproduction has pushed US IQ levels from 115 victorian era to 97 and soon we will fall off the cliff to third world IQ levels. We are entering a century where the american standard of living will decline in parallel with the US Military and the use of the dollar as a reserve currency. The world is going to equilibrate but that means we will be relatively poorer. Just as the vast underclass population we allowed into the country becomes a majority, generates demand for a centrally planned state, and we follow south america into collapse. And that’s before I get started on automation, changes to the labor force, and the problem of organizing people if the voluntary organization of production (markets, money, productivity, incentives) So when you look at that chart outlined in red, you don’t knw what the fk you’re talking about. Drop a few tech companies out of the economy – heck, just apple – and look for productivity gains. They aren’t there.

  • Prewar We Had Done to Europe What China Has Recently Done to Us.

    Dec 25, 2019, 7:37 PM Panic of 1901, a U.S. economic recession that started a fight for financial control of the Northern Pacific Railway Panic of 1907, a U.S. economic recession with bank failures In 1913 we formed the federal reserve. The 19-teens. Visions of Big government danced in their heads. Fiat currency catastrophe begins. The USA becomes a world creditor because of the wars. Depression of 1920-21, a U.S. economic recession following the end of WW1 Roaring 20’s give us Electrification and the Automobile which are the primary drivers of the 20th century. Wall Street Crash of 1929 and Great Depression (1929–1939) the worst depression of modern history 1930’s the Lost Decade of the Great Depression. FDR’s failures at socialism, that end up without result. WW1 and WW2 were financed by high taxation. Restores the economy. Big government at home, becomes big government worldwide as the USA tries to ‘teach the world a lesson’. See the pattern yet? We survived WW2 but the industrialized world was trashed, and the developing world was taking on communism (effectively slave labor). 1950’s were a quiet boom, the height of fashion, family, masculinity and mass migration into home ownership and the middle class. By 1960 it was clear communism couldn’t function. This led to intellectual postmodernism (what we call political correctness – pseudoscience, pseudomathematics, sophistry and denialism) By the mid 1960’s the world had recovered. In 1964 we implement the immigration act designed to flood the country with underclass labor that would drive down the price of labor, and destroy the american experiment of a nation ‘of people of character’ (meaning a middle class nation state). The 1960’s ended the feeling of certainty. Why? The counter culture and media, and the assault on our civilization. Everything goes wrong here. Everything. By 1970 it was clear that unions had run up costs during a period of recovery that could not be paid. Nixon’s was in the right doing it wrong. He’s gone. Vietnam ends. Cold war is at its height. In 1973 we had the oil crisis that crashed our economy. By the mid 70’s only a minority of college educated graduates would find jobs. Gasoline went from .25 a gallon to over $1.00 Secondary banking crisis of 1973–1975 in the UK Latin American debt crisis (late 1970s, early 1980s) known as “lost decade” The automotive industry collapsed, as it tried to convert from making poor quality, heavy cars, to those that could operate By 1976 we understood that Johnson’s Great society project to imitate the soviets had failed and all we had done was destroy black families, the black middle class, and great vast ghettos in urban areas that would bankrupt our cities. In 77 we had star wars and” something changed” – the tech revolution was starting. (I built my first computer). In 1979 we had the second oil crisis. We were tired of ‘losing’ more and more year after year. The seventies ended the postwar economy and with it the socialists and communists’ dreams. In 1980 we elected reagan. He and thatcher ended the postwar social fantasy that soviet or social democratic economics were possible. in 1980 and 1982 we had two recessions. In the 1980s we had the savings and loan crisis. Reagan’s strategy was to bankrupt the soviets and the chinese. It worked. It worked at the cost of debt. Black Monday in 1987 1992 Soviet Collapse results in 1990’s peace dividend, and the roaring 90’s. client server peaks. Internet era starts, cell phone era starts. Dot-com bubble (2000-2002) (US) and… wow. Uncertainty returns. The 1980-2000 period like the teens and twenties, and like the 50’s is a high period for america. 2007-2009 Financial Crisis 2010’s the Lost Decade of World Financial Exhaustion. Late 20-teens america begins ending the postwar order and returning to the world balance of powers, now that technology and power have been equilibrated by the rest of the world ‘catching up’ and americans ‘falling behind’. Do I need to give a lesson to you on the economics of of the late 19th – early 21st century? America was artificially wealthy for (a) conquering a continent, (b) buying the rest from napoleon for cheap, (c) selling it off to ethnic europeans (largely germans) who were genetically middle class and land- constrained (c) using fiat currency to finance the immigration of through the 20’s, (d) inheriting the british empire and replacing london as the world currency, (e) using our resources to fund the world’s recovery (f) and the war against world communism (g) and the war against world islamism that has replaced it. But the world has caught up and we have immigrated the underclasses our ancestors sought to avoid -because they create demand for parasitic redistribution, and authoritarian government, because they are not genetically middle class. We no longer have 400 years of northern european institutional, technological, knowledge, cultural and genetic advantage. Meanwhile the destruction of the family, the substitution of INTEREST for TAXATION, and the decline in reproduction has pushed US IQ levels from 115 victorian era to 97 and soon we will fall off the cliff to third world IQ levels. We are entering a century where the american standard of living will decline in parallel with the US Military and the use of the dollar as a reserve currency. The world is going to equilibrate but that means we will be relatively poorer. Just as the vast underclass population we allowed into the country becomes a majority, generates demand for a centrally planned state, and we follow south america into collapse. And that’s before I get started on automation, changes to the labor force, and the problem of organizing people if the voluntary organization of production (markets, money, productivity, incentives) So when you look at that chart outlined in red, you don’t knw what the fk you’re talking about. Drop a few tech companies out of the economy – heck, just apple – and look for productivity gains. They aren’t there.

  • Will American Capitalism Still Exist in 100 Years?

    Dec 27, 2019, 3:36 PM America doesn’t practice capitalism it practices rule of law, and as a consequence of rule of law, people are limited to survival in markets. Because western civilization began entrepreneurially, developed promise and contract, tort law and property, testimony and jury, we have long standing institutions for enforcing contracts, and long standing tradition of high trust. So for these reasons we could develop large scale organizations using contracts. These large scale organizations using contracts could organize a lot of money behind entrepreneurial ventures. Because of a combination of rule of law of tort, contracts, and large organizations, we could create high production capacity using high capital investment in machines, without resorting to central government control, militarizing people, serfdom or slavery to organize people into large working groups. And using this combination of law, contract, jury, large organizations, and technological innovation, we could drag humanity – resisting us, kicking and screaming – out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, child mortality, early death, tyranny, and the chaos of natural forces, at the cost of creating uncertainty. So people traded poverty and certainty for prosperity and uncertainty. And people continue to make the choice every day. The communists (jews) invented the terms capitalism as a criticism, and socialism and communism as a false promise, as a means of restoring certainty and control over their lives. But neither socialism or communism is possible because both suffer from the four big problems of lack of incentives, and therefore laziness, the inability to use prices to efficiently organize an economy, and endemic corruption by state managed industries and the government, and the tendency of the people to vote themselves or demand themselves into tragedies ofthe commons: consumption higher than production. What the future will bring? In advanced countries one child policies: Automation will continue to drive down human labor markets until only a third of people, or maybe a fifth of people, can find employment, nd those people who work will end democracy and rule the people that can’t. The end result will be eugenics that suppressed the reproduction and consumption of those people who are unable to participate in production distribution and trade. IN poor countries they will forgo automation and continue to use labor, which will produce subsistence level for the poor and a small wealthy class. Just Like the rest of history.