Form: Mini Essay

  • Western Action and Realism vs Eastern Verbalism and Mysticism.

    Hayek didn’t correct Keynes, Hilbert didn’t correct Einstein. Poincare didn’t correct Cantor. Brouwer failed to correct mathematics Bridgman did try to correct the sciences. Doolittle does correct Mises. Same F—king Problem: Western Action and Realism vs Eastern Verbalism and Mysticism. Masculine vs Feminine cognition. Real is real vs Words are real.

  • Male and Female Differences in Mindfulness and Its Affect on Relationships

    Nov 28, 2019, 9:37 AM NET: We are baited into an ideal that s no longer accessible because the incentives are no longer functional. Women are a sex prize on a pedestal, and men are a resource prize. From: 5 Ways Women Are Trained to Hate Men by John Hawkins of RW News and 5 Ways Modern Men Are Trained to Hate Women by David Wong of Cracked There is actually a lot more propaganda aimed at getting women to hate men than vice-versa. 1) Hollywood/Commercials: Ever heard of the Lifetime Network? Every man is a menacing stranger, every husband a wife-beating philanderer, and every date, a potential rape waiting to happen. Then there’s the hapless, incompetent father character who has become such a staple of television shows and commercials that he’s become a stereotype. There are lots of groups that can — and do — complain about how they’re portrayed on TV, but men could kvetch as much as any of them if they so desired. 2) Women’s Magazines/Romance Novels: You might think women’s magazines are all about today’s empowered women who are starting their own businesses, competing with men on their own terms, and working their way to the top in politics. Uh…not quite. In other words, women buy women’s magazines to figure out which sort of men they should pursue and how to please them so they can get married. That’s kind of shallow, but not any moreso than men, who buy men’s magazines primarily to figure out how to impress women. The problem is that women’s magazines, like romance novels, have set the bar so high that there are like 12 guys who meet it. A man is basically looking for a woman he thinks is attractive, who admires him, who’s nice to him, who wants to take care of him, and who likes to cook and have sex. In other words, it’s still probably the same basic formula that cavemen were using. The message women get today, on the other hand, is that they should be looking for a man who looks like a cross between a bodybuilder and a professional model, who should either be filthy rich and/or a viking/pirate/vampire who’s incredibly dangerous and romantic, but can be converted into a house hubby via his emotion-releasing attaction to a woman, so they can live happily ever after, in eternal passion and in complete comfort forevermore. One of the biggest reasons that the age people first get married in this country has gone up considerably over the last few decades is the ideal consistently presented by women’s magazines and romance novels is so far out of line with reality that almost every real man women run across seems like a disappointment in comparison. 3) The court system: The whole “women can do anything a man can do,” “we’re empowered” thing reminds me of a tactic John Stewart likes to use. He makes serious commentary that he wants to affect how people think, but when he gets called on it, he says, “Hey, I’m just a comedian. You can’t take what I say at face value!” In other words, it’s “clown nose on, clown nose off” based on whatever best suits his purposes. We get the same thing with the court system Men and women both have equal responsibility to take care of a child. So, can the father have shared custody after a divorce? No, the kid needs his mother. The woman makes more than the man. Can he have alimony? A man getting alimony? That’s ridiculous! Women are just as tough as men and can do anything they can do in the office! Unless, “Oh my gosh! Someone told a joke about a prostitute and a priest walking into a bar! I’m traumatized! It was almost as bad as the swimsuit calender on the wall! That’s was sexual harassment!” A good looking guy asks a woman out and she goes. An unattractive man asks a woman out and it’s sexual harassment. Clown nose on, women are empowered and strong, clown nose off, women are delicate little flowers who’ll be bruised by being treated the same way men are on a day-to-day basis. 4) Politics: Haven’t you heard about the “war on women?” Women are being asked to pay for their birth control — just like men are! So obviously, they’re being kept down! Haven’t you heard that women don’t make as much as men? Granted, they don’t work as much either or in professions that are as dangerous or unpleasant, but still, it’s men keeping women down! The rhetoric doesn’t need to have anything to do with reality; it just has to be useful to the politicians using it to try to get elected. 5) Liberal feminism: Liberal feminism has as much to do with hating men as it does with empowering women. It tells women that there’s a “patriarchy” out there that doesn’t exist, that men have it better than women, plays up any and all grievances between men and women, tells women they’re victims, and generally does all it can to promote gains for women at the expense of men. Liberal feminism is more of man hater’s philosophy than it is a way to lift up women. Thank goodness that there are so many women out there who don’t pay attention to the conditioning that’s all around them in modern American society. — CURTD – ANALYSIS — “Man is a nesting resource” INSECURITY – HIS ATTENTION IS ELSEWHERE Still talking to his ex Ogling at other women Comparing her to his mother or ex (vs Marrying Up, Divorce, Extract, and Dispose of) INSECURITY – HIS MIND IS ELSEWHERE Obsession with gadgets and machines Turning into fitness freaks (vs Obsession with appearance, nesting, status, and hyperconsumption) UNATTRACTIVENESS – HE DOESN”T FIND ME ATTRACTIVE Inflated male egos in a relationship Zoning out and being a selective listener Being completely unromantic and ignoring expressing love Not putting in the effort to turn on their partners and taking sex for granted (vs inflated female perception of value, talking nonsense to men as if they’re girlfriends, being unattractive, and requiring waaaaay too much work to ‘get some’.) UNINTERESTING – HE DOESN’T SHARE MY INTERESTS Hogging the TV remote Unwilling to compromise with activities and interests (vs omg moronic shallow expensive attention whoring interests) DISRESPECTING – HE DOESN”T RESPECT ME Being disgusted by women’s hygiene issues Making a mess and leaving stuff all over the house Slouching on the couch for the entire weekend Excessive burping and farting –VERSUS– “Woman is a sex resource” Men were raised to conform in order to get an attractive woman (and there aren’t any waist-hip ratios any longer) Men were raised to conform in order to put women on a pedestal. (women are used as bait to civilize us) Women conspire against our sex drive (ok for women to ‘advertise’ despite the fact that we find it exasperating) Men can no longer dominance play or achieve manhood by ‘achievable’ means – women dominate the commons. We Feel Powerless in obtaining sex and attention and so there is no point in being civilized. DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MALE AND FEMALE DEMAND FOR MINDFULNESS For women, mindfulness is almost impossible in general, because of ‘worries’ (threats). For Men: “90 Percent of Our Energy and Discipline Is Devoted to Overcoming Sex-Hunger, to Behave Like Civilized Human Beings” —“It’s like that for most men, most of the time. We’re starving, and all women are various types of food. Only instead of food, it’s sex. And we’re trying to conduct our everyday business around the fact that we’re trying to renew our driver’s license with a talking pair of boobs. So, from about age 13 on, around 90 percent of our energy and discipline is devoted to overcoming this, to behave like civilized human beings and not like stray dogs in a meat market. One where instead of eating the meat, they want to hump it. Again, if you want to experience what it’s like, get a testosterone injection.”—

  • Male and Female Differences in Mindfulness and Its Affect on Relationships

    Nov 28, 2019, 9:37 AM NET: We are baited into an ideal that s no longer accessible because the incentives are no longer functional. Women are a sex prize on a pedestal, and men are a resource prize. From: 5 Ways Women Are Trained to Hate Men by John Hawkins of RW News and 5 Ways Modern Men Are Trained to Hate Women by David Wong of Cracked There is actually a lot more propaganda aimed at getting women to hate men than vice-versa. 1) Hollywood/Commercials: Ever heard of the Lifetime Network? Every man is a menacing stranger, every husband a wife-beating philanderer, and every date, a potential rape waiting to happen. Then there’s the hapless, incompetent father character who has become such a staple of television shows and commercials that he’s become a stereotype. There are lots of groups that can — and do — complain about how they’re portrayed on TV, but men could kvetch as much as any of them if they so desired. 2) Women’s Magazines/Romance Novels: You might think women’s magazines are all about today’s empowered women who are starting their own businesses, competing with men on their own terms, and working their way to the top in politics. Uh…not quite. In other words, women buy women’s magazines to figure out which sort of men they should pursue and how to please them so they can get married. That’s kind of shallow, but not any moreso than men, who buy men’s magazines primarily to figure out how to impress women. The problem is that women’s magazines, like romance novels, have set the bar so high that there are like 12 guys who meet it. A man is basically looking for a woman he thinks is attractive, who admires him, who’s nice to him, who wants to take care of him, and who likes to cook and have sex. In other words, it’s still probably the same basic formula that cavemen were using. The message women get today, on the other hand, is that they should be looking for a man who looks like a cross between a bodybuilder and a professional model, who should either be filthy rich and/or a viking/pirate/vampire who’s incredibly dangerous and romantic, but can be converted into a house hubby via his emotion-releasing attaction to a woman, so they can live happily ever after, in eternal passion and in complete comfort forevermore. One of the biggest reasons that the age people first get married in this country has gone up considerably over the last few decades is the ideal consistently presented by women’s magazines and romance novels is so far out of line with reality that almost every real man women run across seems like a disappointment in comparison. 3) The court system: The whole “women can do anything a man can do,” “we’re empowered” thing reminds me of a tactic John Stewart likes to use. He makes serious commentary that he wants to affect how people think, but when he gets called on it, he says, “Hey, I’m just a comedian. You can’t take what I say at face value!” In other words, it’s “clown nose on, clown nose off” based on whatever best suits his purposes. We get the same thing with the court system Men and women both have equal responsibility to take care of a child. So, can the father have shared custody after a divorce? No, the kid needs his mother. The woman makes more than the man. Can he have alimony? A man getting alimony? That’s ridiculous! Women are just as tough as men and can do anything they can do in the office! Unless, “Oh my gosh! Someone told a joke about a prostitute and a priest walking into a bar! I’m traumatized! It was almost as bad as the swimsuit calender on the wall! That’s was sexual harassment!” A good looking guy asks a woman out and she goes. An unattractive man asks a woman out and it’s sexual harassment. Clown nose on, women are empowered and strong, clown nose off, women are delicate little flowers who’ll be bruised by being treated the same way men are on a day-to-day basis. 4) Politics: Haven’t you heard about the “war on women?” Women are being asked to pay for their birth control — just like men are! So obviously, they’re being kept down! Haven’t you heard that women don’t make as much as men? Granted, they don’t work as much either or in professions that are as dangerous or unpleasant, but still, it’s men keeping women down! The rhetoric doesn’t need to have anything to do with reality; it just has to be useful to the politicians using it to try to get elected. 5) Liberal feminism: Liberal feminism has as much to do with hating men as it does with empowering women. It tells women that there’s a “patriarchy” out there that doesn’t exist, that men have it better than women, plays up any and all grievances between men and women, tells women they’re victims, and generally does all it can to promote gains for women at the expense of men. Liberal feminism is more of man hater’s philosophy than it is a way to lift up women. Thank goodness that there are so many women out there who don’t pay attention to the conditioning that’s all around them in modern American society. — CURTD – ANALYSIS — “Man is a nesting resource” INSECURITY – HIS ATTENTION IS ELSEWHERE Still talking to his ex Ogling at other women Comparing her to his mother or ex (vs Marrying Up, Divorce, Extract, and Dispose of) INSECURITY – HIS MIND IS ELSEWHERE Obsession with gadgets and machines Turning into fitness freaks (vs Obsession with appearance, nesting, status, and hyperconsumption) UNATTRACTIVENESS – HE DOESN”T FIND ME ATTRACTIVE Inflated male egos in a relationship Zoning out and being a selective listener Being completely unromantic and ignoring expressing love Not putting in the effort to turn on their partners and taking sex for granted (vs inflated female perception of value, talking nonsense to men as if they’re girlfriends, being unattractive, and requiring waaaaay too much work to ‘get some’.) UNINTERESTING – HE DOESN’T SHARE MY INTERESTS Hogging the TV remote Unwilling to compromise with activities and interests (vs omg moronic shallow expensive attention whoring interests) DISRESPECTING – HE DOESN”T RESPECT ME Being disgusted by women’s hygiene issues Making a mess and leaving stuff all over the house Slouching on the couch for the entire weekend Excessive burping and farting –VERSUS– “Woman is a sex resource” Men were raised to conform in order to get an attractive woman (and there aren’t any waist-hip ratios any longer) Men were raised to conform in order to put women on a pedestal. (women are used as bait to civilize us) Women conspire against our sex drive (ok for women to ‘advertise’ despite the fact that we find it exasperating) Men can no longer dominance play or achieve manhood by ‘achievable’ means – women dominate the commons. We Feel Powerless in obtaining sex and attention and so there is no point in being civilized. DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MALE AND FEMALE DEMAND FOR MINDFULNESS For women, mindfulness is almost impossible in general, because of ‘worries’ (threats). For Men: “90 Percent of Our Energy and Discipline Is Devoted to Overcoming Sex-Hunger, to Behave Like Civilized Human Beings” —“It’s like that for most men, most of the time. We’re starving, and all women are various types of food. Only instead of food, it’s sex. And we’re trying to conduct our everyday business around the fact that we’re trying to renew our driver’s license with a talking pair of boobs. So, from about age 13 on, around 90 percent of our energy and discipline is devoted to overcoming this, to behave like civilized human beings and not like stray dogs in a meat market. One where instead of eating the meat, they want to hump it. Again, if you want to experience what it’s like, get a testosterone injection.”—

  • The Undermined Our Third Way on Purpose

    Nov 29, 2019, 12:48 PM

    —“We import millions of people, and as they start to commit crime because of the oppressive system, which wipes out the unlucky ones, Steven Pinker publishes a book about how we never had less crime. Or something like that.”—@ArturBooth

    But that’s the whole point of our system: The Third Way. Neither priesthood(poor) or aristocracy(strong) but the third way (meritocracy and the natural law of tort). The question is, why did we in ’65 under Johnson’s Great Society imitation of the Soviets, bring in underclasses? They did it on purpose to DESTROY OUR THIRD WAY through immigration. They failed with economic marxism. The failed with cultural marxism. They failed with postmodernism. But they succeeded in destroying the west only because of immigrating people who can’t exist under The Third Way.

  • The Undermined Our Third Way on Purpose

    Nov 29, 2019, 12:48 PM

    —“We import millions of people, and as they start to commit crime because of the oppressive system, which wipes out the unlucky ones, Steven Pinker publishes a book about how we never had less crime. Or something like that.”—@ArturBooth

    But that’s the whole point of our system: The Third Way. Neither priesthood(poor) or aristocracy(strong) but the third way (meritocracy and the natural law of tort). The question is, why did we in ’65 under Johnson’s Great Society imitation of the Soviets, bring in underclasses? They did it on purpose to DESTROY OUR THIRD WAY through immigration. They failed with economic marxism. The failed with cultural marxism. They failed with postmodernism. But they succeeded in destroying the west only because of immigrating people who can’t exist under The Third Way.

  • Property in Toto (capital) Is Not an Opinion

    Nov 29, 2019, 1:31 PM I’m just MEASURING CHANGES IN CAPITAL. It’s not an opinion. It’s just what exists. There is nothing undecidable by change in capital, any more than change in property, and as such, we see all peoples, all states, in all history operating by this test of reciprocity. So again, the only reason to DISAGREE is to steal. Humans always and everywhere retaliate at high cost, against theft. I’m just explaining the world. If you don’t like it that isn’t material to me. I don’t do ‘good’ I do ‘true’. So the test is not abstractions its cases. If you pick any case i will walk through it and you’ll see you’re engaged in theft and justifying it. Well, then I’ll equally justify your prosecution. That’s what I do: law.

  • Property in Toto (capital) Is Not an Opinion

    Nov 29, 2019, 1:31 PM I’m just MEASURING CHANGES IN CAPITAL. It’s not an opinion. It’s just what exists. There is nothing undecidable by change in capital, any more than change in property, and as such, we see all peoples, all states, in all history operating by this test of reciprocity. So again, the only reason to DISAGREE is to steal. Humans always and everywhere retaliate at high cost, against theft. I’m just explaining the world. If you don’t like it that isn’t material to me. I don’t do ‘good’ I do ‘true’. So the test is not abstractions its cases. If you pick any case i will walk through it and you’ll see you’re engaged in theft and justifying it. Well, then I’ll equally justify your prosecution. That’s what I do: law.

  • The Truth Isn’t Desirable It’s Just True (decidable)

    Nov 29, 2019, 1:59 PM Nature consists of constant relations. We can describe those constant relations. Math is the language of positional relations, logic of set relations, and operations of humanly possible subjectively testable actions. Law consists in the test of the MOST constant relations possible. So a) man creates descriptions of physical laws (applications of entropy), and b) man creates descriptions of natural laws (applications of reciprocity), c) judges discover those applications, and d) man issues command, legislation, and regulation, that is rarely if ever ‘law’. So, I mean, I sense your frustration, but Aristotle started the project, Descartes and the British restored it, Darwin advanced it, and I’m completing it: the scientific method is complete. And it’s completed because we have that method for ALL disciplines now, not just physical. And I don’t expect you to like it any more than the Semites liked Aristotle, the french and germans liked locke, smith, and Hume, or the Church liked Darwin, Menger, and Nietzsche. No one likes having their crimes (parasitisms) suppressed. We do it anyway. Returns are exceptional.

  • The Truth Isn’t Desirable It’s Just True (decidable)

    Nov 29, 2019, 1:59 PM Nature consists of constant relations. We can describe those constant relations. Math is the language of positional relations, logic of set relations, and operations of humanly possible subjectively testable actions. Law consists in the test of the MOST constant relations possible. So a) man creates descriptions of physical laws (applications of entropy), and b) man creates descriptions of natural laws (applications of reciprocity), c) judges discover those applications, and d) man issues command, legislation, and regulation, that is rarely if ever ‘law’. So, I mean, I sense your frustration, but Aristotle started the project, Descartes and the British restored it, Darwin advanced it, and I’m completing it: the scientific method is complete. And it’s completed because we have that method for ALL disciplines now, not just physical. And I don’t expect you to like it any more than the Semites liked Aristotle, the french and germans liked locke, smith, and Hume, or the Church liked Darwin, Menger, and Nietzsche. No one likes having their crimes (parasitisms) suppressed. We do it anyway. Returns are exceptional.

  • Law Replaced Philosophy

    Nov 29, 2019, 2:01 PM Nature consists of constant relations. We can describe those constant relations. Math is the language of positional relations, logic of set relations, and operations of humanly possible subjectively testable actions. Law consists in the test of the MOST constant relations possible. So a) man creates descriptions of physical laws (applications of entropy), and b) man creates descriptions of natural laws (applications of reciprocity), c) judges discover those applications, and d) man issues command, legislation, and regulation, that are rarely if ever ‘law’.