THE NATURAL LAW ON MEDIA CONTENT REGARDING: “News Outlets Are Liable for Others’ Facebook Comments, Australian Court Rules: Australian court says newspapers, TV stations that post their own articles should be considered publishers of defamatory comments” 1 – All copyright law is reduced to creative commons, and narrow interpretation. (Profound) 2 – All public speech: speech in public, to the public, in matters public must be testimonial form: Truthful, Reciprocal, Free of false promise, baiting into hazard, and proposing a competing solution that is truthful and reciprocal. 3 – Defamation by both libel (publication), and slander (speech) is restored. 4 – News (Twitter), Communication (Facebook), and Indexing (Google), as well as consumer banking, and consumer credit (visa/mc) are strategic infrastructure, and nationalized (the state takes a majority interest at the expense of investors as punishment for crimes against the people). 5 – Only content by Identity-Verified Individuals (credit card, phone number, drivers’ license, passport) may be shared outside of voluntary personal networks (friends, followers) by the publisher (platform). Identity of each individual determines jurisdiction of the individual. 6 – All individuals will be profiled for personality, moral, political, and religious biases (this is already extant). Individuals can opt into our out of jurisdictional, linguistic, moral, political, and religious biases (expose filters to users). 7 – Services will be provided for jurisdictions to (a) filter jurisdictions, (b) filter topics, (c) filter users, and (d) filter content. And jurisdictions may filter as they choose. 8 – Otherwise services may NOT filter content except pornography, gore, suicide, and crime. 10 – Services may NOT filter political content or any other content. Individuals that violate content selections will be limited to friends and followers networks. Or friends networks. Or destination (unshared). But they cannot be prohibited from direct voluntary communication within their voluntary network. 11 – All information about individuals, or produced by individuals is forever their property. 12 – All individuals have the right to be forgotten in entirety, but not selectively. AS SUCH All governments have the right and ability to self regulate platform content in their jurisdictions at their own cost, but may not externalize that cost nor involve the hosting service provider ( Platform ) in their internal matters. The united states will consider any attempt to externalize costs onto the service providers as a trade violation, and respond accordingly. AS SUCH The international network governance will be repatriated to the USG, and managed by a volunteer organization sworn to the USG law independent of all other law.
Form: Mini Essay
-
The Natural Law on Media Content
THE NATURAL LAW ON MEDIA CONTENT REGARDING: “News Outlets Are Liable for Others’ Facebook Comments, Australian Court Rules: Australian court says newspapers, TV stations that post their own articles should be considered publishers of defamatory comments” 1 – All copyright law is reduced to creative commons, and narrow interpretation. (Profound) 2 – All public speech: speech in public, to the public, in matters public must be testimonial form: Truthful, Reciprocal, Free of false promise, baiting into hazard, and proposing a competing solution that is truthful and reciprocal. 3 – Defamation by both libel (publication), and slander (speech) is restored. 4 – News (Twitter), Communication (Facebook), and Indexing (Google), as well as consumer banking, and consumer credit (visa/mc) are strategic infrastructure, and nationalized (the state takes a majority interest at the expense of investors as punishment for crimes against the people). 5 – Only content by Identity-Verified Individuals (credit card, phone number, drivers’ license, passport) may be shared outside of voluntary personal networks (friends, followers) by the publisher (platform). Identity of each individual determines jurisdiction of the individual. 6 – All individuals will be profiled for personality, moral, political, and religious biases (this is already extant). Individuals can opt into our out of jurisdictional, linguistic, moral, political, and religious biases (expose filters to users). 7 – Services will be provided for jurisdictions to (a) filter jurisdictions, (b) filter topics, (c) filter users, and (d) filter content. And jurisdictions may filter as they choose. 8 – Otherwise services may NOT filter content except pornography, gore, suicide, and crime. 10 – Services may NOT filter political content or any other content. Individuals that violate content selections will be limited to friends and followers networks. Or friends networks. Or destination (unshared). But they cannot be prohibited from direct voluntary communication within their voluntary network. 11 – All information about individuals, or produced by individuals is forever their property. 12 – All individuals have the right to be forgotten in entirety, but not selectively. AS SUCH All governments have the right and ability to self regulate platform content in their jurisdictions at their own cost, but may not externalize that cost nor involve the hosting service provider ( Platform ) in their internal matters. The united states will consider any attempt to externalize costs onto the service providers as a trade violation, and respond accordingly. AS SUCH The international network governance will be repatriated to the USG, and managed by a volunteer organization sworn to the USG law independent of all other law.
-
The Market Demand for Services Provided by Religion
THE MARKET DEMAND FOR SERVICES PROVIDED BY RELIGION
- The market demand for personal mindfulness (Spiritualism) whether empathic-femining (theological), moral-masculine(rational), or analytic-masculine(scientific) exists, and all three demands exist for most of us. The question is, given how the various religions solved mindfulness (Stoicism-epicureanism, buddhism, hinduism, abrahamism) which produces agency (stoicism), which produces optimism (hinduism), which produces withdrawal from reality (buddhism) and which denies and escapes reality (abrahamism).
Religions must provide interpersonal mindfulness by creating a standard dialog, set of signals, and manners that are costly to learn and practice, but that by practicing display to others you are worthy of honest cooperation on the same terms.
Religions must also provide social mindfulness (limitation of fear and comfort in the ethical, and moral. These are moral rules that serve the group’s competitive strategy – and all reflect the environmental challenges of the age of transformation in which men invented religions.,
Religions must also provide political mindfulness (limits on political action and on rulers actions). I won’t cover each of them here.
Religions must also provide a group strategy – gypsy parasitism, jewish parasitism, muslim parasitism, predation and conquest, christian undermining of the truth, knowledge, reason, law, property, aristocracy by rallying the peasantry and women and slaves against all and being as expansionary as islam – to counter islam. Buddhist submission and obedience Hindu class duty and function in the ‘harmony’. Chinese hierarchical family (bureaucracy). Anglo aristocratic egalitarianism (entrepreneurship and corporation).
So 1. personal mindfulness (peace of mind), 2. interpersonal, 3. social, 4. political, 5. strategic. All of these are served by training in stoicism and epicureanism(realism, naturalism, reciprocity, living within your means, surrounding yourself with family and friends, and insulation from competitive status signaling), training interpersonal reciprocity, social reciprocity, training in political reciprocity, and training in group strategic reciprocity. The fact that we train people in reading, writing, arithmetic, mathematics, and the sciences, and indoctrinate them into falsehoods of marxism (class undermining), feminism(male undermining), and postmodernism (group undermining), but DON”T train them in stoic mindfulness, epicurean happiness, basic money, household finance, and accounting, basic law of contract and reciprocity, the testimony, the grammars, logics, rhetoric, and produce holidays that celebrate our seasons and heroes, thinkers, and sants is just a choice. The only addiction christianity adds is the transformation of western paternalism of masculine aristocracy, to the feminine submission to a false god, the pretense of equality of all, and the one good thing: the feminine emulation of jesus in the extension of forgiveness instead of semitic hypersensitivity to insult and slight – we call this christian love. It’s just self virtue signaling in exchange for immunity from offense by petty people endemic among the desperate, poor and ignorant. The real reason people rely on abrahamic religion is to disintermediate themselves from others status signals so that theyc an preserve mindfulness and self image despite continuous rejection. The reason we want to live in the christian world is because we are not subject to continuous rejection but continuous tolerance and forgiveness (love). The program of the marxists, feminists, and postmodernists, is to UNDERMINE christian love from within. Undermine the faith. Undermine the ethics Generate envy and hatred between genders, classes, and identity groups, in order to sew discord that creates demand for an authoritarian state which can extract almost unlimited income from the population to resolve the conflicts that the government created. This is all you need to understand about (a) religion, (b) christianity in politics (c) how we can state christianity in legal terms, (d) how we can teach stoicism and epicureanism and history and truth rather than semitic lies, and (e) how we are undermined because christians will not fight the enemy.
-
The Market Demand for Services Provided by Religion
THE MARKET DEMAND FOR SERVICES PROVIDED BY RELIGION
- The market demand for personal mindfulness (Spiritualism) whether empathic-femining (theological), moral-masculine(rational), or analytic-masculine(scientific) exists, and all three demands exist for most of us. The question is, given how the various religions solved mindfulness (Stoicism-epicureanism, buddhism, hinduism, abrahamism) which produces agency (stoicism), which produces optimism (hinduism), which produces withdrawal from reality (buddhism) and which denies and escapes reality (abrahamism).
Religions must provide interpersonal mindfulness by creating a standard dialog, set of signals, and manners that are costly to learn and practice, but that by practicing display to others you are worthy of honest cooperation on the same terms.
Religions must also provide social mindfulness (limitation of fear and comfort in the ethical, and moral. These are moral rules that serve the group’s competitive strategy – and all reflect the environmental challenges of the age of transformation in which men invented religions.,
Religions must also provide political mindfulness (limits on political action and on rulers actions). I won’t cover each of them here.
Religions must also provide a group strategy – gypsy parasitism, jewish parasitism, muslim parasitism, predation and conquest, christian undermining of the truth, knowledge, reason, law, property, aristocracy by rallying the peasantry and women and slaves against all and being as expansionary as islam – to counter islam. Buddhist submission and obedience Hindu class duty and function in the ‘harmony’. Chinese hierarchical family (bureaucracy). Anglo aristocratic egalitarianism (entrepreneurship and corporation).
So 1. personal mindfulness (peace of mind), 2. interpersonal, 3. social, 4. political, 5. strategic. All of these are served by training in stoicism and epicureanism(realism, naturalism, reciprocity, living within your means, surrounding yourself with family and friends, and insulation from competitive status signaling), training interpersonal reciprocity, social reciprocity, training in political reciprocity, and training in group strategic reciprocity. The fact that we train people in reading, writing, arithmetic, mathematics, and the sciences, and indoctrinate them into falsehoods of marxism (class undermining), feminism(male undermining), and postmodernism (group undermining), but DON”T train them in stoic mindfulness, epicurean happiness, basic money, household finance, and accounting, basic law of contract and reciprocity, the testimony, the grammars, logics, rhetoric, and produce holidays that celebrate our seasons and heroes, thinkers, and sants is just a choice. The only addiction christianity adds is the transformation of western paternalism of masculine aristocracy, to the feminine submission to a false god, the pretense of equality of all, and the one good thing: the feminine emulation of jesus in the extension of forgiveness instead of semitic hypersensitivity to insult and slight – we call this christian love. It’s just self virtue signaling in exchange for immunity from offense by petty people endemic among the desperate, poor and ignorant. The real reason people rely on abrahamic religion is to disintermediate themselves from others status signals so that theyc an preserve mindfulness and self image despite continuous rejection. The reason we want to live in the christian world is because we are not subject to continuous rejection but continuous tolerance and forgiveness (love). The program of the marxists, feminists, and postmodernists, is to UNDERMINE christian love from within. Undermine the faith. Undermine the ethics Generate envy and hatred between genders, classes, and identity groups, in order to sew discord that creates demand for an authoritarian state which can extract almost unlimited income from the population to resolve the conflicts that the government created. This is all you need to understand about (a) religion, (b) christianity in politics (c) how we can state christianity in legal terms, (d) how we can teach stoicism and epicureanism and history and truth rather than semitic lies, and (e) how we are undermined because christians will not fight the enemy.
-
What ‘Traditional’ Means, What to Say Instead, and How to Restore Reciprocity Between Genders.
WHAT ‘TRADITIONAL’ MEANS, WHAT TO SAY INSTEAD, AND HOW TO RESTORE RECIPROCITY BETWEEN GENDERS. Advice to Libertarian(ideology), Constitutional (rule of law), Right(normative tradition), and Religious(theological tradition): Avoid “Traditional” as it’s indefensible. (FWIW; it means ’empirically successful in pre technological history because of the division of labor necessary under intergenerational agrarianism.’) Better argument is “Biological gender roles constitute the optimum Nash equilibrium under which all of us do the best we can even if none of us or few of us do as well as we’d wish, without imposing irreciprocal hardship upon one another.” This is why we evolved paring off and serial monogamy, and only developed long term monogamy as (a) we lived longer (b) we developed property and productivity and (c) were able to perform intergenerational care in exchange for intergenerational inheritance. Because of the narrower distribution of desirable men, and the wider distribution of desirable women and the increase in the division of labor such that women are freed from manual household labor like men are (largely)freed from manual environmental labor, we can no longer expect postwar rates of marriage, and will return to pre-industrial rates of marriage – preserving it more commonly among the better classes who have greater interests in property and its returns, and the working and laboring classes who possess sufficient in-class sexual social market value, and sufficient conscientiousness and reciprocity, and returning to serial or parallel relations around maternal households living on the edge of self sufficiency. However, we can eliminate ir-reciprocity for MEN in the current era, by (a) ending marriage to the state (redistribution); (b) ending community property, alimony, child support, (c) restore liability for interference in a marriage; (e) restore voluntary disassociation so that men can reform paternal institutions of reciprocal support in lieu of marriage; and (d) forcible savings for retirement that is unattachable by anyone and everyone as insurance by and for the polity from your moral hazard of self insufficiency. In other words, we can restore reciprocal interest in the returns on investment in a partnership, by restoring the disincentive to parasitically live off others permitted by their intuition of reciprocity against moral hazard.
-
What ‘Traditional’ Means, What to Say Instead, and How to Restore Reciprocity Between Genders.
WHAT ‘TRADITIONAL’ MEANS, WHAT TO SAY INSTEAD, AND HOW TO RESTORE RECIPROCITY BETWEEN GENDERS. Advice to Libertarian(ideology), Constitutional (rule of law), Right(normative tradition), and Religious(theological tradition): Avoid “Traditional” as it’s indefensible. (FWIW; it means ’empirically successful in pre technological history because of the division of labor necessary under intergenerational agrarianism.’) Better argument is “Biological gender roles constitute the optimum Nash equilibrium under which all of us do the best we can even if none of us or few of us do as well as we’d wish, without imposing irreciprocal hardship upon one another.” This is why we evolved paring off and serial monogamy, and only developed long term monogamy as (a) we lived longer (b) we developed property and productivity and (c) were able to perform intergenerational care in exchange for intergenerational inheritance. Because of the narrower distribution of desirable men, and the wider distribution of desirable women and the increase in the division of labor such that women are freed from manual household labor like men are (largely)freed from manual environmental labor, we can no longer expect postwar rates of marriage, and will return to pre-industrial rates of marriage – preserving it more commonly among the better classes who have greater interests in property and its returns, and the working and laboring classes who possess sufficient in-class sexual social market value, and sufficient conscientiousness and reciprocity, and returning to serial or parallel relations around maternal households living on the edge of self sufficiency. However, we can eliminate ir-reciprocity for MEN in the current era, by (a) ending marriage to the state (redistribution); (b) ending community property, alimony, child support, (c) restore liability for interference in a marriage; (e) restore voluntary disassociation so that men can reform paternal institutions of reciprocal support in lieu of marriage; and (d) forcible savings for retirement that is unattachable by anyone and everyone as insurance by and for the polity from your moral hazard of self insufficiency. In other words, we can restore reciprocal interest in the returns on investment in a partnership, by restoring the disincentive to parasitically live off others permitted by their intuition of reciprocity against moral hazard.
-
The Postmodern Program – Truth Doesn’t Matter, It’s All Just Reducible to Power
THE POSTMODERN PROGRAM – TRUTH DOESN’T MATTER, IT’S ALL JUST REDUCIBLE TO POWER
—“Talked to a physical professor today, he said … It is *semantics* to say: that energy is not always heat, and that heat flow is irreversible, and that heat is produced as a difference in temperature and flows from hot to cold. …Yep…that happened. It usually happens over internet communication. First time to my face.”— Joseph E. Postma —“Proof that the sickness of postmodernism has also infected the hard sciences.”—Murray O’Brien —“You might as well go into a church and try to explain to the congregation that there is no god. But, the POINT is, those that matter, in the congregation, do not care if there is a god or not. They know the belief in a god is what they benefit from. So, they are the ones that have to destroy you, by any means. Otherwise they lose their control over, and resulting benefit from, the rest of the believing congregation. It is simply a matter of control, NOT science, or logic, or reason.”—Derek Alker –“Simply a matter of power.”— Joseph E. Postma
-
The Postmodern Program – Truth Doesn’t Matter, It’s All Just Reducible to Power
THE POSTMODERN PROGRAM – TRUTH DOESN’T MATTER, IT’S ALL JUST REDUCIBLE TO POWER
—“Talked to a physical professor today, he said … It is *semantics* to say: that energy is not always heat, and that heat flow is irreversible, and that heat is produced as a difference in temperature and flows from hot to cold. …Yep…that happened. It usually happens over internet communication. First time to my face.”— Joseph E. Postma —“Proof that the sickness of postmodernism has also infected the hard sciences.”—Murray O’Brien —“You might as well go into a church and try to explain to the congregation that there is no god. But, the POINT is, those that matter, in the congregation, do not care if there is a god or not. They know the belief in a god is what they benefit from. So, they are the ones that have to destroy you, by any means. Otherwise they lose their control over, and resulting benefit from, the rest of the believing congregation. It is simply a matter of control, NOT science, or logic, or reason.”—Derek Alker –“Simply a matter of power.”— Joseph E. Postma
-
Human Needs Aren’t Human Rights
HUMAN NEEDS AREN’T HUMAN RIGHTS
—“I can’t have a right to food, but I can have a right to eat.”– JWP
There are no pre-existing fundamental rights. Only a natural demand for certain necessary rights. We can and do work together to produce those rights. What you mean is that it is beneficial. But one cannot POSSIBLY exercise a right that was not created by others, and one cannot possibly exercise a positive right that places demands upon others. As such all existentially possible rights are only via negativa: freedom from harm by others. There are many desirable GOODS that we might work together to obtain. There are however no existential rights no matter how much we pay wish there work (or lie that there are).
-
Human Needs Aren’t Human Rights
HUMAN NEEDS AREN’T HUMAN RIGHTS
—“I can’t have a right to food, but I can have a right to eat.”– JWP
There are no pre-existing fundamental rights. Only a natural demand for certain necessary rights. We can and do work together to produce those rights. What you mean is that it is beneficial. But one cannot POSSIBLY exercise a right that was not created by others, and one cannot possibly exercise a positive right that places demands upon others. As such all existentially possible rights are only via negativa: freedom from harm by others. There are many desirable GOODS that we might work together to obtain. There are however no existential rights no matter how much we pay wish there work (or lie that there are).