Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • Corporatism as A Vehicle for Understanding All Political History

    Oct 15, 2019, 9:43 AM I want to disambiguate corporatism into a spectrum so that the criticisms are decidable by definition rather than by free-association. In other words, corporatism vs what?

    1. Corporatism. Bottom up: control of the state by economic common-interest groups vs Top down: the state’s organization of and control of the polity into economic common-interest groups.

    Corporatism arose from indo-european economic tripartism in the cooperative division of labor between military, administrative(educated), and laboring classes. The reason why it evolved in a militial order is obvious. The current “neo-corporatist” condition consists of negotiations between state(homogenous) labour (homogenous), and business (heterogeneous) to establish policy. This is the origin of social democracy. However, social democracy with forcible redistribution violates the ancestral paternalism, by putting control of common sproduction in the hands of the majority, and thereby taking away business’ necessity of care taking of labor as extension of family, and treating labor as resource rather than family members. (See pre-unification german industry, esp. Krupp). Heterogeneity of polity increases incentive to defect from this model, thereby producing the problems of the middle east and steppe, and the low trust of the far east (china) – all of which practice clan(kinship)-corporatism instead of economic interest corporatism. So I’ll cast social corporatism as rule of law, paternalism, and kinship, vs kinship by clan interests – vertical and hostile – rather than economic interests (esp class) – horizontal and interdependent. ie: economic produces economic trust, kinship produces clan trust. And the results are rather obvious. And so once again I’ll cast communism as monopoly underclass rule, libertarianism as monopoly middle class rule, and neoconservativsm as monopoly upper class rule, and cast tripartism as a division of labor between the classes for collective good. Socialism was a french invention largely a continuation of the extermination of the protestants (middle class) and the aristocracy (upper class). With new leadership merely rotating in to those positions and forcing out the economic middle that emerged in the anglo civilization (and which increased insecurity while increasing opportunity.) Fascism in Spain, Italy, and Germany was an attempt to Resist both communism (underclass monopoly) and french socialism (constraint of the middle class by the upper class for labor’s benefit), but not russian-jewish socialism (eradication of the middle class, and the upper class). And I’ll cast the term corporatism as an obscurant that relies upon suggestion by free association conveying no information other than “something bad”. So we have at least the pair of traditional axis: (a) rule for profit by individual or oligarchy(dictatorship, kinship, oligarchy), rule by collective classes(market), rule by monopoly classes (communism, russian-socialism, chinese socialism) and (b) clan corporatism (nationalism) vs economic corporatism (state), vs military corporatism (empire). So rule of law will result in market (economic corporatism) and nationalism (clan corporatism) or statism (state corporatism), with the possibility of paternalism (voluntary caretaking between the classes requiring nationalism. That is probably a distillation of everything meaningful that can be debated in the question of the organization of polities by criteria of decidability. And everything else is some form of bias coercion or deceit. I don’t think the above can be falsified. And it prevents our interpretation of history by eliminating contrary proposition (and definitions).

  • The Insult.

    Semites are all women. Semites have emotions like women. Semites think like women. Semites talk like women. Semites all lie like women. We have a story “Hermes and the cart of lies”. Arabs stole all the lies in his cart. That is why semites have failed without a more advanced people to provide for you – like women. It is why you cannot suffer – like women. It is why you are afraid of women – they get more attention than you. This is why you seek clothes and hair and jewels – like women. This is why you complain -like women. It is why you fight – like women. It is why you cannot make an army – like women. I is why you cannot make a business – like women. Because you are all women. Our men do not talk. They do not say proud words. And if they choose to end you, they will end you forever. So do not use proud words with us. Save them for our politicians, who like you, are just women. So save your words of women for each other – like women.

    الساميون هم من النساء. لدى السامية عواطف مثل النساء. الساميون يفكرون مثل النساء. الساميون يتحدثون مثل النساء. الساميون مثل النساء. لدينا قصة “هيرميس وعربة الأكاذيب”. سرق العرب كل الأكاذيب في عربته. هذا هو السبب في أن السامية قد فشلوا دون وجود أشخاص أكثر تقدمًا لك – مثل النساء. لهذا السبب لا يمكنك أن تتعرض للإهانات – مثل النساء. هذا هو السبب في أنك تخاف من النساء – يحصلن على اهتمام أكثر منك. هذا هو السبب في أنك تبحث عن الملابس والشعر والمجوهرات – مثل النساء. هذا هو السبب في أنك تشكو النساء. لهذا السبب تقاتل – مثل النساء. لهذا السبب لا يمكنك تكوين جيش مثل النساء. هذا هو السبب في أنه لا يمكنك جعل الأعمال التجارية مثل النساء. لأنك كل النساء. رجالنا لا يتحدثون. لا يقولون كلمات فخورة. وإذا اختاروا إنهاءك ، فسوف ينهونك إلى الأبد. لذلك لا تستخدم كلمات فخور معنا. احتفظي بهم لسياستنا ، الذين مثلكم ، هم فقط من النساء. لذا احفظ كلماتك عن النساء لبعضهن البعض – مثل النساء. نحن نعرف سر السامية: أنتم جميعاً مجرد نساء ، ويجب أن يحكم مثل النساء. لا يحترم مثل الرجال. ؛)

  • The Insult.

    Semites are all women. Semites have emotions like women. Semites think like women. Semites talk like women. Semites all lie like women. We have a story “Hermes and the cart of lies”. Arabs stole all the lies in his cart. That is why semites have failed without a more advanced people to provide for you – like women. It is why you cannot suffer – like women. It is why you are afraid of women – they get more attention than you. This is why you seek clothes and hair and jewels – like women. This is why you complain -like women. It is why you fight – like women. It is why you cannot make an army – like women. I is why you cannot make a business – like women. Because you are all women. Our men do not talk. They do not say proud words. And if they choose to end you, they will end you forever. So do not use proud words with us. Save them for our politicians, who like you, are just women. So save your words of women for each other – like women.

    الساميون هم من النساء. لدى السامية عواطف مثل النساء. الساميون يفكرون مثل النساء. الساميون يتحدثون مثل النساء. الساميون مثل النساء. لدينا قصة “هيرميس وعربة الأكاذيب”. سرق العرب كل الأكاذيب في عربته. هذا هو السبب في أن السامية قد فشلوا دون وجود أشخاص أكثر تقدمًا لك – مثل النساء. لهذا السبب لا يمكنك أن تتعرض للإهانات – مثل النساء. هذا هو السبب في أنك تخاف من النساء – يحصلن على اهتمام أكثر منك. هذا هو السبب في أنك تبحث عن الملابس والشعر والمجوهرات – مثل النساء. هذا هو السبب في أنك تشكو النساء. لهذا السبب تقاتل – مثل النساء. لهذا السبب لا يمكنك تكوين جيش مثل النساء. هذا هو السبب في أنه لا يمكنك جعل الأعمال التجارية مثل النساء. لأنك كل النساء. رجالنا لا يتحدثون. لا يقولون كلمات فخورة. وإذا اختاروا إنهاءك ، فسوف ينهونك إلى الأبد. لذلك لا تستخدم كلمات فخور معنا. احتفظي بهم لسياستنا ، الذين مثلكم ، هم فقط من النساء. لذا احفظ كلماتك عن النساء لبعضهن البعض – مثل النساء. نحن نعرف سر السامية: أنتم جميعاً مجرد نساء ، ويجب أن يحكم مثل النساء. لا يحترم مثل الرجال. ؛)

  • There Is Nothing Wrong with African Americans that Bad Policy Didn’t Cause

    THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH AFRICAN AMERICANS THAT BAD POLICY DIDN’T CAUSE Subsaharan Africans ask me all the time. So do north africans. So do south americans. So do Egyptians and persians. So to south indians. “What is wrong with us?” There is nothing wrong other than many at the bottom in relation to the skills necessary for comparative advantage. Without comparative advantage (the ability to economically compete on world markets) you’re stuck in poverty – permanently. And it will not be possible to organize complex production without four to six generations of zero births at the bottom. It is not possible to produce a voluntary organization of production (market economy) and the incentives and efficiency of a market economy, nor a Pareto hierarchy of people and assets (people who know how to produce economic returns from productivity), with a bottom heavy distribution of population. It’s not POSSIBLE. There was a short window that the russians tried to use but everyone other than the russians failed, and the russians tried to use it for more than one generation. You can’t. It’s not possible. So, you see outrage blame and oppression where I see statistics: Why are blacks so excessively impulsive, violent, lacking discipline and agency? Well, the answer is (a) our tolerance for it (b) they mature earlier and we’re not providing training to a demographic that matures faster than all others (c) and instead forcing them to adhere to standards they can’t, without the training for it. (d) and then subjecting them to continuous negative signaling, social, economic, political, and police pressure because we failed to provide that training – and worse, because we failed to prohibit reproduction below minimum IQ and minimum trait conscientiousness, and minimum psychopathy (anti-social behavior). A century ago “George” would have been hanged by now and eliminated from the population. But we let women vote. And we let blacks into the franchise without first requiring full integration including into middle class manners ethics and morals. We let communsits, neo-marxists, socialists, postmodernists go unpunished instead of purging them like we did past heretics. We’re soft. We pay the price of our softness. He  (“George”) did too. And the police officers will as well.  We pay the cost of feminine magical thinking (a problem in males as well as females). A magical thinking that mothers require to invest in often hopeless offspring (a third of all children are in the bottom third so to speak), but women evidently cannot suppress that magical thinking political judgement and vote by intuition instead of empiricism, and are easy victims of pseudoscience that satisfies their magical thinking. Data is data. The harsh truths of black frustration, aggression, violence, personality, and intelligence distributions mean that the africans did not go through agrarian genetic pacification like peoples in colder climes, so that the vast majority of the african population is underclass and unemployable. We complain our white ancestors may have been oppressed. But that’s counter to the evidence. they were domesticated (genetically pacified) like all other animals, by selection for living in close quarters in cold climates with limited growing seasons. So were east asians. The warmer climes were not. This is why there is such a difference between european and east asians, and an even greater difference between protestant europeans who practiced bipartite manorialism, and even grater difference with north sea europeans who did so for longer, and were under the absolute nuclear family – where you could not reproduce unless you could demonstrate marriage, and character necessary to obtain farm land. The dirty secret of western civlization is we have been practicing soft eugenics for four thousand years. By the late middle ages all of north and central europe was genetically middle class. Under normal conditions, african americans would evolve traditions, norms, manners, ethics and morals within the community that would mitigate their behavior at their faster rate of maturity and resulting higher impulsivity. Under FORCED INTEGRATION we prohibit their formation of ingroup manners, ethics, morals, institutions, and elites. So instead of continuing pre-mid-century separation, continuing pre-war eugenics, letting the black community continue to develop a middle class and institutions suitable to their rates and depths of development (sexual maturity), and the self respect from having done so – the democratic party (seeking power by seeking dependents) has destroyed their culture and made them dysgenic, incompetent, dependents victim-signaling from a life of continuous hopelessness. There is nothing wrong with black people that self-governance would not cure. While all peoples are compatible by trade in markets, not all people are compatible in neighborhoods, commons, education, and the workforce. And so, you ‘idealistic idiots’ are well meaning but cruel fools. Separate. Evolve. Prosper, and cooperate by markets where we cannot cooperate in neighborhoods, business, commons, or even polities. Whites rule better than all other people on earth by a long shot. But self rule is always preferable. And cities can functions as markets for heterogeneity as they have throughout history, while outside them we maintain our homogeneity, and the resulting, high trust, manners, ethics, morals, traditions, and resulting, laws institutions, and knowledge.

  • There Is Nothing Wrong with African Americans that Bad Policy Didn’t Cause

    THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH AFRICAN AMERICANS THAT BAD POLICY DIDN’T CAUSE Subsaharan Africans ask me all the time. So do north africans. So do south americans. So do Egyptians and persians. So to south indians. “What is wrong with us?” There is nothing wrong other than many at the bottom in relation to the skills necessary for comparative advantage. Without comparative advantage (the ability to economically compete on world markets) you’re stuck in poverty – permanently. And it will not be possible to organize complex production without four to six generations of zero births at the bottom. It is not possible to produce a voluntary organization of production (market economy) and the incentives and efficiency of a market economy, nor a Pareto hierarchy of people and assets (people who know how to produce economic returns from productivity), with a bottom heavy distribution of population. It’s not POSSIBLE. There was a short window that the russians tried to use but everyone other than the russians failed, and the russians tried to use it for more than one generation. You can’t. It’s not possible. So, you see outrage blame and oppression where I see statistics: Why are blacks so excessively impulsive, violent, lacking discipline and agency? Well, the answer is (a) our tolerance for it (b) they mature earlier and we’re not providing training to a demographic that matures faster than all others (c) and instead forcing them to adhere to standards they can’t, without the training for it. (d) and then subjecting them to continuous negative signaling, social, economic, political, and police pressure because we failed to provide that training – and worse, because we failed to prohibit reproduction below minimum IQ and minimum trait conscientiousness, and minimum psychopathy (anti-social behavior). A century ago “George” would have been hanged by now and eliminated from the population. But we let women vote. And we let blacks into the franchise without first requiring full integration including into middle class manners ethics and morals. We let communsits, neo-marxists, socialists, postmodernists go unpunished instead of purging them like we did past heretics. We’re soft. We pay the price of our softness. He  (“George”) did too. And the police officers will as well.  We pay the cost of feminine magical thinking (a problem in males as well as females). A magical thinking that mothers require to invest in often hopeless offspring (a third of all children are in the bottom third so to speak), but women evidently cannot suppress that magical thinking political judgement and vote by intuition instead of empiricism, and are easy victims of pseudoscience that satisfies their magical thinking. Data is data. The harsh truths of black frustration, aggression, violence, personality, and intelligence distributions mean that the africans did not go through agrarian genetic pacification like peoples in colder climes, so that the vast majority of the african population is underclass and unemployable. We complain our white ancestors may have been oppressed. But that’s counter to the evidence. they were domesticated (genetically pacified) like all other animals, by selection for living in close quarters in cold climates with limited growing seasons. So were east asians. The warmer climes were not. This is why there is such a difference between european and east asians, and an even greater difference between protestant europeans who practiced bipartite manorialism, and even grater difference with north sea europeans who did so for longer, and were under the absolute nuclear family – where you could not reproduce unless you could demonstrate marriage, and character necessary to obtain farm land. The dirty secret of western civlization is we have been practicing soft eugenics for four thousand years. By the late middle ages all of north and central europe was genetically middle class. Under normal conditions, african americans would evolve traditions, norms, manners, ethics and morals within the community that would mitigate their behavior at their faster rate of maturity and resulting higher impulsivity. Under FORCED INTEGRATION we prohibit their formation of ingroup manners, ethics, morals, institutions, and elites. So instead of continuing pre-mid-century separation, continuing pre-war eugenics, letting the black community continue to develop a middle class and institutions suitable to their rates and depths of development (sexual maturity), and the self respect from having done so – the democratic party (seeking power by seeking dependents) has destroyed their culture and made them dysgenic, incompetent, dependents victim-signaling from a life of continuous hopelessness. There is nothing wrong with black people that self-governance would not cure. While all peoples are compatible by trade in markets, not all people are compatible in neighborhoods, commons, education, and the workforce. And so, you ‘idealistic idiots’ are well meaning but cruel fools. Separate. Evolve. Prosper, and cooperate by markets where we cannot cooperate in neighborhoods, business, commons, or even polities. Whites rule better than all other people on earth by a long shot. But self rule is always preferable. And cities can functions as markets for heterogeneity as they have throughout history, while outside them we maintain our homogeneity, and the resulting, high trust, manners, ethics, morals, traditions, and resulting, laws institutions, and knowledge.

  • Monarchy = Private Property State

    —“The way I think about it is; only a pre-existing state is capable of preventing people from forming a new state, so libertarianism is less “doomed to fail” than it is a complete nonstarter.”—James Brittingham

    MONARCHY = PRIVATE PROPERTY STATE It’s also doomed to fail, since the balance of commons vs private consumption isn’t possible unless the monarchy owns the territory, collects rents on it, and produces commons from the rent, thereby making all parties, including the state, private property owners. P-MONARCHY In P I argue that a monarchy can only survive corporally in the age of gunpowder b/c it’s dependent upon the militia and military rather than an alliance of land-holding families of professional warriors – with the relationship between militia and monarchy governed by rule of law. I prefer income taxes over land taxes, and I prefer rental income be limited to the monarchy or ‘the church’, just as I prefer consumer credit be handled by the monarchy, and the privatization of all bureaucracy as customer service organizations – thus preventing rent-seeking across the spectrum. Unions then serve as insurers of relations, and insurers fulfill their functions of insurers of property, and families return to insurers of kin, and we, incrementally wipe all rent seeking off the map, driving all capital into longer and longer and larger and larger investment and return cycles. It is possible to restore responsibility and accountability because the economy will be purged of innumeracy and itself returned ot ‘accountability’. ie: no more financial and economic lies.

  • Monarchy = Private Property State

    —“The way I think about it is; only a pre-existing state is capable of preventing people from forming a new state, so libertarianism is less “doomed to fail” than it is a complete nonstarter.”—James Brittingham

    MONARCHY = PRIVATE PROPERTY STATE It’s also doomed to fail, since the balance of commons vs private consumption isn’t possible unless the monarchy owns the territory, collects rents on it, and produces commons from the rent, thereby making all parties, including the state, private property owners. P-MONARCHY In P I argue that a monarchy can only survive corporally in the age of gunpowder b/c it’s dependent upon the militia and military rather than an alliance of land-holding families of professional warriors – with the relationship between militia and monarchy governed by rule of law. I prefer income taxes over land taxes, and I prefer rental income be limited to the monarchy or ‘the church’, just as I prefer consumer credit be handled by the monarchy, and the privatization of all bureaucracy as customer service organizations – thus preventing rent-seeking across the spectrum. Unions then serve as insurers of relations, and insurers fulfill their functions of insurers of property, and families return to insurers of kin, and we, incrementally wipe all rent seeking off the map, driving all capital into longer and longer and larger and larger investment and return cycles. It is possible to restore responsibility and accountability because the economy will be purged of innumeracy and itself returned ot ‘accountability’. ie: no more financial and economic lies.

  • The Left confuses PROGRESS with CONSUMPTION. And OPPRESSION with DOMESTICATION.

    The Left confuses PROGRESS with CONSUMPTION. And OPPRESSION with DOMESTICATION. We evolved Property, Law, Markets and resulting Eugenics to limit Hyper-Consumption, and Impose domestication upon semi-human animals by constraining the reproduction of both genders to what they could produce. One can spend increases in production but if one just spends down accumulated genetic capital, one is not engaging in progress, but burning the winter stores for an endless fall feast. Only far east and far west produced majority genetic middle class civilizations. And Redistribution under ‘democracy’ reversed five thousand years of western civilization’s domestication of human polities in just a century. Edit

  • The Left confuses PROGRESS with CONSUMPTION. And OPPRESSION with DOMESTICATION.

    The Left confuses PROGRESS with CONSUMPTION. And OPPRESSION with DOMESTICATION. We evolved Property, Law, Markets and resulting Eugenics to limit Hyper-Consumption, and Impose domestication upon semi-human animals by constraining the reproduction of both genders to what they could produce. One can spend increases in production but if one just spends down accumulated genetic capital, one is not engaging in progress, but burning the winter stores for an endless fall feast. Only far east and far west produced majority genetic middle class civilizations. And Redistribution under ‘democracy’ reversed five thousand years of western civilization’s domestication of human polities in just a century. Edit

  • All We Have to Do Is Turn Entire Cities Into Ghettos

    ALL WE HAVE TO DO IS TURN ENTIRE CITIES INTO GHETTOS The Medieval and Ancient world turned city ‘Quarters’ into ghettos for hosted hostile alien underclasses. All we need to do is turn entire secessionist cities into ghettos. They can practice their own customs there, but must remain there. An immigrant city is just a plantation for the financial and bureaucratic classes.

    —“While having lunch with @RandPaul in California, we got verbally assaulted by these aggressive libs complaining about incivility. Check out the vid! #unhinged”— Anon

    —“Lol they’re literally just talking to the guy, but sure let’s call it “verbal assault” and then cry about liberals destroying the English language later. Sorry if this hurt.” — renewmeme @renewmeme

    What hurt? I agree with the OP. About a third of women are mentally ill – that’s the real reason we closed the asylums: they were full of women. Whereas the extreme male manifests in autism, the extreme female manifests is psychosis. Combine with Infantilization of males in education, the lower testosterone of lower middle and upper proletarian classes, and indoctrination into pseudoscience,sophism and denialism in the university and we see this kind of behavior from women, and pseudo-males defend them. Add a hostile excitable minority practicing systematic undermining of western civilization and you get the scenario we just saw in the video. It’s not rocket science. It’s just hatred of western civilization.