Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • The Parallel Between Germany and China – Perfection, But For One Terrible Error

    PARALLEL BETWEEN GERMANY AND CHINA CHINA China was genetically, culturally, institutionally, and technologically superior and had ethnically spread cross near countries and evolved them, China had a long educational history. China had a profound bureaucracy. China had a more than competent military China had a more than competent workforce China had an industrial advantage over the eastern continent. China had been wronged by the British empire, China had had a failed ‘new government’ with terrible consequences. GERMANY Germany was genetically, culturally, institutionally, and technologically superior and had spread across nearby countries and evolved them. Germany was the intellectual and academic core of europe. Germany had the best bureaucracy in the advanced world. Germany had a better more advanced industry and polity that was a quality advantage over the western continent. Germany had a martial aristocracy – the best in the world. Germany had been wronged by napoleon (destroying the core of Europe – the holy roman empire) Germany had been wronged in ww1 (attempting to restore herself and her people) Germany would be wronged in ww2 (attempting to restore her self and her people) THE MODEL FOR BOTH Ethnonationalism, State Capitalism, State Secular Religion of Nationalism, State Intolerance for competition, State education and indoctrination, full employment, amazing benefits. The unparalleled devotion and unity not seen before. An army of society. PERFECTION … BUT It was perfect for both countries. But … … AH overreached and practiced ideology over empiricism. … Just as Xi Jinping has overreached and is practicing ideology over empiricism. THIS IS THE BEST MODEL FOR MAN: Ethnonationalism, State Capitalism, State Secular Religion of Nationalism, State Intolerance for competition, State education and indoctrination, full employment, amazing benefits. The unparalleled devotion and unity not seen before. BUT THIS IS THE REASON FOR ALL FAILURE OF MAN: Ideology (or faith) over Evidence. Overreach.

  • The Parallel Between Germany and China – Perfection, But For One Terrible Error

    PARALLEL BETWEEN GERMANY AND CHINA CHINA China was genetically, culturally, institutionally, and technologically superior and had ethnically spread cross near countries and evolved them, China had a long educational history. China had a profound bureaucracy. China had a more than competent military China had a more than competent workforce China had an industrial advantage over the eastern continent. China had been wronged by the British empire, China had had a failed ‘new government’ with terrible consequences. GERMANY Germany was genetically, culturally, institutionally, and technologically superior and had spread across nearby countries and evolved them. Germany was the intellectual and academic core of europe. Germany had the best bureaucracy in the advanced world. Germany had a better more advanced industry and polity that was a quality advantage over the western continent. Germany had a martial aristocracy – the best in the world. Germany had been wronged by napoleon (destroying the core of Europe – the holy roman empire) Germany had been wronged in ww1 (attempting to restore herself and her people) Germany would be wronged in ww2 (attempting to restore her self and her people) THE MODEL FOR BOTH Ethnonationalism, State Capitalism, State Secular Religion of Nationalism, State Intolerance for competition, State education and indoctrination, full employment, amazing benefits. The unparalleled devotion and unity not seen before. An army of society. PERFECTION … BUT It was perfect for both countries. But … … AH overreached and practiced ideology over empiricism. … Just as Xi Jinping has overreached and is practicing ideology over empiricism. THIS IS THE BEST MODEL FOR MAN: Ethnonationalism, State Capitalism, State Secular Religion of Nationalism, State Intolerance for competition, State education and indoctrination, full employment, amazing benefits. The unparalleled devotion and unity not seen before. BUT THIS IS THE REASON FOR ALL FAILURE OF MAN: Ideology (or faith) over Evidence. Overreach.

  • PARALLEL BETWEEN GERMANY AND CHINA China is practicing fascist, racist, national

    PARALLEL BETWEEN GERMANY AND CHINA

    China is practicing fascist, racist, national socialism (state capitalism). Naziism won the battle of the 20th century. It just won in china. and it’s winning.

    CHINA

    China was genetically, culturally, institutionally, and technologically superior and had ethnically spread cross near countries and evolved them,

    China had a long educational history.

    China had a profound bureaucracy.

    China had a more than competent military

    China had a more than competent workforce

    China had an industrial advantage over the eastern continent.

    China had been wronged by the British empire,

    China had had a failed ‘new government’ with terrible consequences.

    GERMANY

    Germany was genetically, culturally, institutionally, and technologically superior and had spread across nearby countries and evolved them.

    Germany was the intellectual and academic core of europe.

    Germany had the best bureaucracy in the advanced world.

    Germany had a better more advanced industry and polity that was a quality advantage over the western continent.

    Germany had a martial aristocracy – the best in the world.

    Germany had been wronged by napoleon (destroying the core of Europe – the holy roman empire)

    Germany had been wronged in ww1 (attempting to restore herself and her people)

    Germany would be wronged in ww2 (attempting to restore her self and her people)

    THE MODEL FOR BOTH

    Ethnonationalism, State Capitalism, State Secular Religion of Nationalism, State Intolerance for competition, State education and indoctrination, full employment, amazing benefits. The unparalleled devotion and unity not seen before. An army of society.

    PERFECTION … BUT

    It was perfect for both countries.

    But …

    … AH overreached and practiced ideology over empiricism.

    … Just as Xi Jinping has overreached and is practicing ideology over empiricism.

    THIS IS THE BEST MODEL FOR MAN:

    Ethnonationalism, State Capitalism, State Secular Religion of Nationalism, State Intolerance for competition, State education and indoctrination, full employment, amazing benefits. The unparalleled devotion and unity not seen before.

    BUT THIS IS THE REASON FOR ALL FAILURE OF MAN:

    Ideology (or faith) over Evidence.

    Overreach.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-22 10:43:00 UTC

  • RELIGION IS A TECHNOLOGY. WE DONT NEED TO PROVE IT”S TRUE. JUST JUDGE ITS EFFECT

    RELIGION IS A TECHNOLOGY. WE DONT NEED TO PROVE IT”S TRUE. JUST JUDGE ITS EFFECTS (GOOD AND BAD)

    by Frey Harman (edited for clarity)

    What we need to do is disprove this idea of needing to prove things. [CD: Or claim religion is ‘true’ rather than effective and quite possibly necessary.]

    Religion is a technology. Technology either works or it doesn’t. Science can’t do anything to technology except explain it. If we demarcate science from technology, science seeks general rules of the universe – to understand. Technology is usually developed by trial and error to serve a purpose – to act. And, [psychlogial and social] technology isn’t even based on science, nor informed by science. Often, technology outpaces science. I’m not sure why philosophy would have any more to say about the matter of religion as a technology than science does: regardless of whether it’s true or what general rules religions follow, the technology works or doesn’t, and works beneficially or harmfully.

    Nassim Taleb was somewhat influential in snapping me out of the false dichotomy between atheism and monotheistic fundamentalism – making me realize they’re two sides of the same coin; two interpretations derived ultimately from the same error. The error of taking things too literally.

    —“When someone discusses religious beliefs, he does not necessarily mean belief in the epistemic sense, and the relevance of the epistemic sense of the term decreases the further back ones goes in the fixation of the creed. Rather, such notions are rather closer to the root of “belief”: beloved, a sense of commitment, something related to the notion of trust. It is not coincidental that “credere” is related to letter of credit or financial transactions that entail trust (see Armstrong 1994; Boyer 2001). …. Accordingly it is an extremely naive interpretation to think that religious ‘beliefs’ map to the ‘justified true belief’ standards of modern epistemology (see Ichikawa and Steup 2014); it is naive to examine the supernatural aspect of religion as anything but epiphenomenal. One needs to think of religious ‘belief’ as closer to a form of trusting, as a form of action, or a willingness to take action, and, most crucially of all, as a set of interdicts upon action. Further, religion establishes a categorical demarcation between sacred and profane, and one that cannot be violated (see Eliade 1959). The sacred is not open to ‘rationalization’ what we don’t understand is not necessarily irrational, and it might have reasons that can be probed only across generations of experience and experimentation.”— Taleb

    —-

    By CurtD

    Great quote.

    This is correct.

    I state the same thing in economic language: by Belief (love, trust, respect, submission of self), religion (debt performance, oath), and anthropomorphisms (systems of measurement, choice, in payment of debt, in exchange for love and respect) provide the most intuitive system of behavior manageable by man.

    So as usual, Taleb is less ‘scientific’ and more ‘literary’ than I am. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-22 10:19:00 UTC

  • Q: WHAT TO DO WHEN THE MAN KNOCKS 😉

    Q: WHAT TO DO WHEN THE MAN KNOCKS 😉 Someone asked. Here is the answer. Two people have been contacted in the past month or so. Both for activities online that were unrelated to our movement, but were slips made in rage. We never do anything illegal or recommend anything illegal. It is counter-productive to do anything other than political activism that draws attention to our policies. We use a lot of devices to encourage the spread of our ideas. And to give our people courage that if push comes to shove they can win. But you will notice how very careful I am. And how I won’t even talk to troublemakers. I’m very deliberately following in the steps of the founders, and following settled federal law that licenses Americans almost uniquely in the world to propose political change in the model of the founders. If you are involved with our group at all and you get involved with other activities you are putting us at risk. We don’t need you to put us at risk. TESTOSTERONE IS A WONDERFUL DRUG. I realize there are a lot of young men with young men’s testosterone and that online bravado and sh-t talking is part of being one of today’s young men. On the other hand you can easily cross the line. And you are most likely to cross the line when you lose your temper. It is losing your temper that makes people worried – not your trash talking. THEY’RE DOING THEIR JOB This forces cops that would rather be solving ‘real crimes’ to do their job given the ‘escalations’ that happened last year. If you know someone who did or said something stupid you are likely to get a call. if you do something serious THEY SHOW UP and knock on your door. If you do something really really stupid a raid. It’s the economics of law enforcement: their effort follows your degree of stupidity. 😉 But 99.999999% of the time someone in some online group commented on, or said something that could be misinterpreted as a legitimate threat. That means they are trying to get dirt on someone else – not necessarily you. If you’re involved in other groups or other events or with other people then look there. Usually we know all what we did to attract attention, because we remember losing it, and usually its saying something ‘stupid’ in haste. Sometimes it’s venting by larping – and it’s possible to interpret your larping as a threat. You don’t have to learn more than once anything you tell law enforcement passes thru a telephone-game of continuous modification worse than the news media and workplace-gossip because the law enforcement just like the media frames everything in whatever institutional narrative they are familiar with – and these are ordinary guys not rocket scientists. Anything you say will not be interpreted or recorded or communicated as you said it. All human organizations do this. This is why I emphasize ‘man up, shut up, show up’. With ‘shut up’ being an imperative. Group political activism is safe. Larping online is more dangerous than showing up in large groups. BE POLITE. BE CALM. BE CLEAR. But If you DO get a call, either don’t answer it, or don’t return it. If it’s serious they state the question on the message or they show up. They don’t call. If you talk to them, be polite at all times (they are doing their job) do not be afraid or angry (they are doing their job) tell them that you won’t talk to them without a warrant and lawyer. And say absolutely nothing else. Don’t ever talk to them without a lawyer. Ever. They will take a normal person’s read on you. If you are scared of them, or threatening to them, or irrational, or even impolite, that means more bad than anything you can say good. Help them do their job: Just tell them that you are just an activist, never engage in anything other than activism, won’t talk to them without a warrant and a lawyer, and wish them good luck in their investigation. Unless there is imminent danger to someone’s life, then you will help. Unless they already have you for some crime or other they will go away because you aren’t worth the effort. If you are worth their effort then you did something stupid. lol Don’t do stupid things. 😉 Please.

  • Q: WHAT TO DO WHEN THE MAN KNOCKS 😉

    Q: WHAT TO DO WHEN THE MAN KNOCKS 😉 Someone asked. Here is the answer. Two people have been contacted in the past month or so. Both for activities online that were unrelated to our movement, but were slips made in rage. We never do anything illegal or recommend anything illegal. It is counter-productive to do anything other than political activism that draws attention to our policies. We use a lot of devices to encourage the spread of our ideas. And to give our people courage that if push comes to shove they can win. But you will notice how very careful I am. And how I won’t even talk to troublemakers. I’m very deliberately following in the steps of the founders, and following settled federal law that licenses Americans almost uniquely in the world to propose political change in the model of the founders. If you are involved with our group at all and you get involved with other activities you are putting us at risk. We don’t need you to put us at risk. TESTOSTERONE IS A WONDERFUL DRUG. I realize there are a lot of young men with young men’s testosterone and that online bravado and sh-t talking is part of being one of today’s young men. On the other hand you can easily cross the line. And you are most likely to cross the line when you lose your temper. It is losing your temper that makes people worried – not your trash talking. THEY’RE DOING THEIR JOB This forces cops that would rather be solving ‘real crimes’ to do their job given the ‘escalations’ that happened last year. If you know someone who did or said something stupid you are likely to get a call. if you do something serious THEY SHOW UP and knock on your door. If you do something really really stupid a raid. It’s the economics of law enforcement: their effort follows your degree of stupidity. 😉 But 99.999999% of the time someone in some online group commented on, or said something that could be misinterpreted as a legitimate threat. That means they are trying to get dirt on someone else – not necessarily you. If you’re involved in other groups or other events or with other people then look there. Usually we know all what we did to attract attention, because we remember losing it, and usually its saying something ‘stupid’ in haste. Sometimes it’s venting by larping – and it’s possible to interpret your larping as a threat. You don’t have to learn more than once anything you tell law enforcement passes thru a telephone-game of continuous modification worse than the news media and workplace-gossip because the law enforcement just like the media frames everything in whatever institutional narrative they are familiar with – and these are ordinary guys not rocket scientists. Anything you say will not be interpreted or recorded or communicated as you said it. All human organizations do this. This is why I emphasize ‘man up, shut up, show up’. With ‘shut up’ being an imperative. Group political activism is safe. Larping online is more dangerous than showing up in large groups. BE POLITE. BE CALM. BE CLEAR. But If you DO get a call, either don’t answer it, or don’t return it. If it’s serious they state the question on the message or they show up. They don’t call. If you talk to them, be polite at all times (they are doing their job) do not be afraid or angry (they are doing their job) tell them that you won’t talk to them without a warrant and lawyer. And say absolutely nothing else. Don’t ever talk to them without a lawyer. Ever. They will take a normal person’s read on you. If you are scared of them, or threatening to them, or irrational, or even impolite, that means more bad than anything you can say good. Help them do their job: Just tell them that you are just an activist, never engage in anything other than activism, won’t talk to them without a warrant and a lawyer, and wish them good luck in their investigation. Unless there is imminent danger to someone’s life, then you will help. Unless they already have you for some crime or other they will go away because you aren’t worth the effort. If you are worth their effort then you did something stupid. lol Don’t do stupid things. 😉 Please.

  • Christianity in Europe Was a Religion Of, For, and By the Elite.

    CHRISTIANITY IN EUROPE WAS A RELIGION OF, FOR, AND BY THE ELITE. (Christianity = Marxism-Postmodernism) “All roads lead to Rome. Christianity in Europe was a religion of, for, and by the elite. For example Catholic Mass was given in Latin until 1963. Did peasants speak, read or understand Latin? Not 12th century french peasants that is for damn sure. The elite nature of the church goes back to the original legitimacy of kings. When the Roman Empire collapsed there was a huge power vacuum in the conquered territories. The very small and very young Catholic Church held onto its dominance in Europe by holding onto the power of the ancient Pontiff Maximus. Kindling the ancient legitimacy and glory of Rome the Pope was the origin of authority in Christendom. Here we have to interject a distinction between the Eastern and western Roman empires. In the Orthodox and Eastern Church the High Priest did not trump the authority of the Kings/Emperors. But, in the West the Pontiff (Pope) did trump the authority of kings. This traditional distinction between the two could go back to Caesar being Pontiff Maximus before being Emperor. And later Constantine being King who appointed priests. Remember when Napoleon crowned himself Emperor? This was to signify that he stands over the authority of the pope. First off what we know today as France was not completely unified during the Middle Ages. It was actually a diverse place with a Normans, Franks, Goths, Anglo-Germanic peoples, and who could forget the Swiss. If we start with the two hundred years between Charlemagne and the Norman invasion of Great Britain (East Anglia) in 1066 as a measure we can be assured that peasants in Europe were still very pagan. Charlemagne (crowned by the Pope) spread the authority of the Holy Roman Empire with a sword. Charlemagne is basically the ultimate Christian warrior king for Christ. If you do some digging you will find much of his kingship was spent on horseback spreading the word by spilling blood. He traveled collected taxes and asserted his and the Churches legitimate authority. In Early Christian France alone there is a very very diverse group of peoples living together. So basically the average peasant would only know what they are told by the Church i.e. the divine nature of the king, the dominance of the Christ, the meaning of the divine birth, and the meaning of Christ’s death. What is interesting is the degree of which the early church in Europe actually adapted the rituals and practices of the people in Europe. For exapmle we even today still celebrate, May first (Beltaine), Christmas (Saturnalia), Easter(Roman New Year), and Holloween (Samhaine). Have you ever played around a May Pole? Have you ever kissed under Holly? What about drinking at the modern New Year? All of these holidays (Holy Days) were originally pagan holy days. Is it not interesting how we still celebrate them? Did you know the puritan colony of Massachusetts had laws prohibiting all of the aforementioned Holy Days on the grounds that they were in fact Pagan! So basically the early church appealed to the native religions of Europe by adapting their practices. Because remember, Europeans were the first conquest of the cross they had to be slowly integrated because there were far to many pagans to kill. So in a TLDR answer to your question a peasant in early christian France would most likely still know about the ancient religion of their forefathers. They would be practicing Christians but the practices of villages across France would be markedly different. If you ever visit France you will notice village saints or church relics across the country. The peasants would know relatively know nothing outside of their small worlds. Being illiterate and with feudal system laws in place tying people to the land there was little opportunity for people to learn much about the world out side of what the local authority figures said. Those saints were once either pagan gods or heroes now forgotten and adapted by the Church. Those relics therein were once pagan relics. This was the only way the early church was able to survive in the Pagan stronghold of Europe. Through a conquest of integration built off of the once Omnipotent authority of the Roman Empire. Remember Beowulf was written down in the 11th century the line between pagan and christian was still fairly thin well into the renascence. There are some, like Colin, who have even theorized that the Druids, and Pagan Kings went underground joining the church in an attempt to keep their ancient traditions alive.” Edit: sources: Viola, Frank and Greg Barna: Pagan Chritianity (2008) González, Justo L. (1984). The Story of Christianity: Vol. 1: The Early Church to the Reformation. San Francisco: Harper. Grabar, André (1968). Christian iconography, a study of its origins. Princeton University Press. Morris, Colin (1989). The papal monarchy : the western church from 1050 to 1250. Oxford: Clarendon.

  • Christianity in Europe Was a Religion Of, For, and By the Elite.

    CHRISTIANITY IN EUROPE WAS A RELIGION OF, FOR, AND BY THE ELITE. (Christianity = Marxism-Postmodernism) “All roads lead to Rome. Christianity in Europe was a religion of, for, and by the elite. For example Catholic Mass was given in Latin until 1963. Did peasants speak, read or understand Latin? Not 12th century french peasants that is for damn sure. The elite nature of the church goes back to the original legitimacy of kings. When the Roman Empire collapsed there was a huge power vacuum in the conquered territories. The very small and very young Catholic Church held onto its dominance in Europe by holding onto the power of the ancient Pontiff Maximus. Kindling the ancient legitimacy and glory of Rome the Pope was the origin of authority in Christendom. Here we have to interject a distinction between the Eastern and western Roman empires. In the Orthodox and Eastern Church the High Priest did not trump the authority of the Kings/Emperors. But, in the West the Pontiff (Pope) did trump the authority of kings. This traditional distinction between the two could go back to Caesar being Pontiff Maximus before being Emperor. And later Constantine being King who appointed priests. Remember when Napoleon crowned himself Emperor? This was to signify that he stands over the authority of the pope. First off what we know today as France was not completely unified during the Middle Ages. It was actually a diverse place with a Normans, Franks, Goths, Anglo-Germanic peoples, and who could forget the Swiss. If we start with the two hundred years between Charlemagne and the Norman invasion of Great Britain (East Anglia) in 1066 as a measure we can be assured that peasants in Europe were still very pagan. Charlemagne (crowned by the Pope) spread the authority of the Holy Roman Empire with a sword. Charlemagne is basically the ultimate Christian warrior king for Christ. If you do some digging you will find much of his kingship was spent on horseback spreading the word by spilling blood. He traveled collected taxes and asserted his and the Churches legitimate authority. In Early Christian France alone there is a very very diverse group of peoples living together. So basically the average peasant would only know what they are told by the Church i.e. the divine nature of the king, the dominance of the Christ, the meaning of the divine birth, and the meaning of Christ’s death. What is interesting is the degree of which the early church in Europe actually adapted the rituals and practices of the people in Europe. For exapmle we even today still celebrate, May first (Beltaine), Christmas (Saturnalia), Easter(Roman New Year), and Holloween (Samhaine). Have you ever played around a May Pole? Have you ever kissed under Holly? What about drinking at the modern New Year? All of these holidays (Holy Days) were originally pagan holy days. Is it not interesting how we still celebrate them? Did you know the puritan colony of Massachusetts had laws prohibiting all of the aforementioned Holy Days on the grounds that they were in fact Pagan! So basically the early church appealed to the native religions of Europe by adapting their practices. Because remember, Europeans were the first conquest of the cross they had to be slowly integrated because there were far to many pagans to kill. So in a TLDR answer to your question a peasant in early christian France would most likely still know about the ancient religion of their forefathers. They would be practicing Christians but the practices of villages across France would be markedly different. If you ever visit France you will notice village saints or church relics across the country. The peasants would know relatively know nothing outside of their small worlds. Being illiterate and with feudal system laws in place tying people to the land there was little opportunity for people to learn much about the world out side of what the local authority figures said. Those saints were once either pagan gods or heroes now forgotten and adapted by the Church. Those relics therein were once pagan relics. This was the only way the early church was able to survive in the Pagan stronghold of Europe. Through a conquest of integration built off of the once Omnipotent authority of the Roman Empire. Remember Beowulf was written down in the 11th century the line between pagan and christian was still fairly thin well into the renascence. There are some, like Colin, who have even theorized that the Druids, and Pagan Kings went underground joining the church in an attempt to keep their ancient traditions alive.” Edit: sources: Viola, Frank and Greg Barna: Pagan Chritianity (2008) González, Justo L. (1984). The Story of Christianity: Vol. 1: The Early Church to the Reformation. San Francisco: Harper. Grabar, André (1968). Christian iconography, a study of its origins. Princeton University Press. Morris, Colin (1989). The papal monarchy : the western church from 1050 to 1250. Oxford: Clarendon.

  • Transcending Abrahamic Method of Deceit

      Abrahamism like Aristotelianism and Confucianism consists of a means of persuasion: a ‘grammar’. Aristotelian Truth, Confucian Wisdom, and Abrahamic Deceit. Aristotle and Confucius make no false promises, bait man with no lies, speak of the beauty of life. The Abrahamic death cults hate life, hate civilization, and promise falsehoods to bait the ignorance into supernatural submission, rather than the hard work of developing agency. There is a reason the European Jews did nothing except produce volumes of mysticism, develop organized financial crime; the Christians did nothing but spread superstition, ignorance, and reverse Greco roman literacy learning and commerce; and the Muslims reduced to ignorance, dysgenic, and ashes every great civilization of the ancient world. Abrahamic religions are just an addictive drug for those unwilling and lacking leadership that trains them as the Romans and Greeks did, through incentives for status, into developing agency: knowledge of, adaptation to, and application of, the physical, natural, evolutionary laws, by thought, display, word, and deed, of realism, naturalism, and operationalism. My work merely exposes the Abrahamic method of deceit that utilizes the female strategy of seduction and addiction, using false unwarrantable promises of freedom from physical natural and evolutionary laws, and extends existing law on fraud to criminalize the Abrahamic method of fraud and political warfare, in all speech in public to the public in matters public. That’s the premise of the work. The prohibition on false promises baiting into hazard. And the reformation of our informational, educational, economic, and political commons to purge those false promises. Grow up. Man up. Face the Truth. Learn from the east Chinese and our pre-Christian ancestors – the only peoples to escape the great lies. There are no gods but those we imagine. And those we imagine are literary archetypes, that provide a system of intuitionistic measurement for our group’s strategy. And the Abrahamic gods are, at best, when undressed, the most evil demons man can conceive. And we know this by the evidence, no matter what lies and excuses their addicted slaves concoct. Aristotle is our lawgiver: the laws of nature. Tyr/Tiwaz is our god (universal military militia). Heroes of History are our Demigods. Stoicism/Epicureanism are our religion of mindfulness. Only Nature and Ancestors and Nature are due our debts (worship). And all universalist gods are the enemy of our people. Jesus was – at best – a philosopher the eastern empire dressed up in garb to make the conquered peoples submissive so that they could be taxed and ruled. At worst he was another Abrahamic deceiver who taught the dysgenic bottom, like Gandhi, how do undermine the aristocracy that sought to drag mankind out of ignorance, superstition, and poverty. Aristotelianism is the most advanced system of thought most correspondent with the laws of the universe, that empowers man to transcend the animal, and Abrahamism is the most advanced system of lying to deny them and destroy mankind ever invented. The Byzantines the Romans and finally the Germans, and then Germanized Christianity, and the British in science, the french in socialism, the germans in philosophy – all Europeans – seek to escape it with Americans the only hold outs. The only problem is they failed to replace it. Or rather they replaced it with the doctrine of human rights, without providing the stoic discipline, political discipline, social integration, or german culture to bring it about. This is a problem we can solve.

  • Transcending Abrahamic Method of Deceit

      Abrahamism like Aristotelianism and Confucianism consists of a means of persuasion: a ‘grammar’. Aristotelian Truth, Confucian Wisdom, and Abrahamic Deceit. Aristotle and Confucius make no false promises, bait man with no lies, speak of the beauty of life. The Abrahamic death cults hate life, hate civilization, and promise falsehoods to bait the ignorance into supernatural submission, rather than the hard work of developing agency. There is a reason the European Jews did nothing except produce volumes of mysticism, develop organized financial crime; the Christians did nothing but spread superstition, ignorance, and reverse Greco roman literacy learning and commerce; and the Muslims reduced to ignorance, dysgenic, and ashes every great civilization of the ancient world. Abrahamic religions are just an addictive drug for those unwilling and lacking leadership that trains them as the Romans and Greeks did, through incentives for status, into developing agency: knowledge of, adaptation to, and application of, the physical, natural, evolutionary laws, by thought, display, word, and deed, of realism, naturalism, and operationalism. My work merely exposes the Abrahamic method of deceit that utilizes the female strategy of seduction and addiction, using false unwarrantable promises of freedom from physical natural and evolutionary laws, and extends existing law on fraud to criminalize the Abrahamic method of fraud and political warfare, in all speech in public to the public in matters public. That’s the premise of the work. The prohibition on false promises baiting into hazard. And the reformation of our informational, educational, economic, and political commons to purge those false promises. Grow up. Man up. Face the Truth. Learn from the east Chinese and our pre-Christian ancestors – the only peoples to escape the great lies. There are no gods but those we imagine. And those we imagine are literary archetypes, that provide a system of intuitionistic measurement for our group’s strategy. And the Abrahamic gods are, at best, when undressed, the most evil demons man can conceive. And we know this by the evidence, no matter what lies and excuses their addicted slaves concoct. Aristotle is our lawgiver: the laws of nature. Tyr/Tiwaz is our god (universal military militia). Heroes of History are our Demigods. Stoicism/Epicureanism are our religion of mindfulness. Only Nature and Ancestors and Nature are due our debts (worship). And all universalist gods are the enemy of our people. Jesus was – at best – a philosopher the eastern empire dressed up in garb to make the conquered peoples submissive so that they could be taxed and ruled. At worst he was another Abrahamic deceiver who taught the dysgenic bottom, like Gandhi, how do undermine the aristocracy that sought to drag mankind out of ignorance, superstition, and poverty. Aristotelianism is the most advanced system of thought most correspondent with the laws of the universe, that empowers man to transcend the animal, and Abrahamism is the most advanced system of lying to deny them and destroy mankind ever invented. The Byzantines the Romans and finally the Germans, and then Germanized Christianity, and the British in science, the french in socialism, the germans in philosophy – all Europeans – seek to escape it with Americans the only hold outs. The only problem is they failed to replace it. Or rather they replaced it with the doctrine of human rights, without providing the stoic discipline, political discipline, social integration, or german culture to bring it about. This is a problem we can solve.