Form: Mini Essay

  • Follow the Money: The Catholic Church

    Follow the Money: The Catholic Church

    FOLLOW THE MONEY: THE CATHOLIC CHURCH

    A majority non-European church, non-european god, non-europan prophet, of non-European mythology, in non-european language, of non-European people, with non-European metaphysics, non-European organizations, morals, and ethics, specializing in recruiting mentally, sexually and socially dysfunctional, will undoubtedly answer your prayers for ‘whiteness’ salvation. Um. No.

    Follow the money. The Catholic Church died by a thousand cuts, was dismembered by Darwin, didn’t survive the wars, and the plastic surgery of Vatican II ensured the corpse would decay before another century passed, with the pedophila scandals just naming the pall bearers.

    We need a religion of the Primacy of MAN, and the transcendence of man into gods we imagined.

    (Attached, Pew Research. 2010 data. it’s worse now.)

  • Are Instincts Enough? (No)

    ARE INSTINCTS ENOUGH? (NO)

    —“Can much of human life not be governed by instinct, from fighting to family to other personal functions? Expert pattern recognition is one thing, but can’t personal life be run pretty much by natural law functioning through the instincts?”—Paul

    Hmm.. Instinct > Intuition > habit > norms > traditions > laws > group strategy.

    And our instinct is reciprocity within the limits of proportionality. So if we have ‘enough’ we are likely to be moral. If we do not have enough we are increasingly likely to stretch the limits of morality because we feel we’re outside the limit of proportionality. Which is the leftist lower middle, working, laboring, and underclass instinct. And Harm-Care bias is the privileged class’ instinct for broadcasting virtue signals thereby claiming their moral superiority without paying any cost for it themselves. Likewise the privileged (I’m guilty in the past) feel we can get away with things because we are ‘superior’. So the middle class that has ‘enough’ is the sort of norm we have to regulate the top and bottom to – because instinct follows status (proportionality).

    And, you know the smart people bias? How we can’t imagine how dumb others are? Well, there is moral bias too. We can’t imagine how intuitively immoral others are. And if you spend any time with street people, or even poor people, their ethics are similar but their morality is very different – out of necessity.

    So, if courts of the natural, empirical, common law of tort are there to REGULATE us, sure. Personal life can be run pretty much by our instinct of natural law. But if you look around the world, at every culture, across all time, the instinctual norm is self-interest constantly testing the border of ethics and morality. Humans are amoral, and minimally moral. So we must REGULATE intuition regardless of instinct.

    Graceful increase in success (knowlege, calculation), and graceful failure (instinct, tradition).

    Graceful Adaptability to Time and Knowledge: Brainstem > instinct > intuition > experience > knowledge > reason > calculation > computation.

    We must train one another to use the most costly tool we can wield in the given time frame.

    The Law Creates a Standard of Weight and Measure

  • Are Instincts Enough? (No)

    ARE INSTINCTS ENOUGH? (NO)

    —“Can much of human life not be governed by instinct, from fighting to family to other personal functions? Expert pattern recognition is one thing, but can’t personal life be run pretty much by natural law functioning through the instincts?”—Paul

    Hmm.. Instinct > Intuition > habit > norms > traditions > laws > group strategy.

    And our instinct is reciprocity within the limits of proportionality. So if we have ‘enough’ we are likely to be moral. If we do not have enough we are increasingly likely to stretch the limits of morality because we feel we’re outside the limit of proportionality. Which is the leftist lower middle, working, laboring, and underclass instinct. And Harm-Care bias is the privileged class’ instinct for broadcasting virtue signals thereby claiming their moral superiority without paying any cost for it themselves. Likewise the privileged (I’m guilty in the past) feel we can get away with things because we are ‘superior’. So the middle class that has ‘enough’ is the sort of norm we have to regulate the top and bottom to – because instinct follows status (proportionality).

    And, you know the smart people bias? How we can’t imagine how dumb others are? Well, there is moral bias too. We can’t imagine how intuitively immoral others are. And if you spend any time with street people, or even poor people, their ethics are similar but their morality is very different – out of necessity.

    So, if courts of the natural, empirical, common law of tort are there to REGULATE us, sure. Personal life can be run pretty much by our instinct of natural law. But if you look around the world, at every culture, across all time, the instinctual norm is self-interest constantly testing the border of ethics and morality. Humans are amoral, and minimally moral. So we must REGULATE intuition regardless of instinct.

    Graceful increase in success (knowlege, calculation), and graceful failure (instinct, tradition).

    Graceful Adaptability to Time and Knowledge: Brainstem > instinct > intuition > experience > knowledge > reason > calculation > computation.

    We must train one another to use the most costly tool we can wield in the given time frame.

    The Law Creates a Standard of Weight and Measure

  • Accusations of Narcissism? Self Defense.

    [I]’ve had therapy. Quite a lot. About three months every four years or so. I use it whenever I go through a change or difficulty in life. Mostly when I move. Or if I exit a relationship.

    Consistent Diagnosis? Some variation on “Intimidatingly smart Aspie nerd that can still somehow manage to dress himself in clothes that match, and use table manners, hold polite conversation, but who is burdened with an autistic and obsessive demand for ‘truth’ (precision?) that overwhelms what is already low agreeableness, resulting in unbearable arrogance if challenged, and a disturbingly uncaring attitude toward conventional formalisms he intuits as posturing but others consider themselves respectful.”

    Self orientation is due to self observation. Aspies tend to be self referential given lack of empathic comparisons. The fact that I can turn the lens of my autism on myself is no different from turning it on anything else.

    Along with aspiness, I naturally mantain emotional distance from people other than say, my present romantic relationship. I’m hypersensitive to baiting into emotional exchanges (trust relationships) at a sacrifice or cost. This unwillingness to fall for the bait of engaging in emotional reciprocity (equality) in exchange for approval is aggravating. Sure, I want to get along. I want to enjoy life. I like people. But I don’t want approval at a cost to my ‘obsessions’. I don’t value it. It’s not that I’m valuing myself. It’s just valuing truth, doing my work, creative freedom, more than approval, and far more than approval at the cost of falsehoods or tolerances.

    Women, in particular, find this aggravating because as a CEO or Exec as well as a philosopher, while I very much enjoy women’s company, I’m “immune” to female seduction into demand for their approval. I’ve had multiple women call me a sociopath because they can’t manipulate me. (I’m not, not even close).

    My self-image is just that I’m relentless, will tolerate more pain than anyone else, and that I keep on going toward my goal no matter what. It’s not that I think I”m a good person. Just the opposite. I have a lot of guilt over those many times when I haven’t been a good person. And I have more guilt over those times when it’s unintentionally caused by my aspiness (obsessive single-mindedness?). Because it’s a full-time job monitoring it, and I’m angry I failed. 😉

    The difference is that most aspies won’t work hard enough at fighting their aspiness to learn to be normal despite the pain and frustration with it. Likewise, most people won’t fight to build companies despite the pain of it. Or build intellectual fortresses or intellectual and political movements.

    I just fight on and on and on. And fighting has become ‘the way’ I achieve.

  • Accusations of Narcissism? Self Defense.

    [I]’ve had therapy. Quite a lot. About three months every four years or so. I use it whenever I go through a change or difficulty in life. Mostly when I move. Or if I exit a relationship.

    Consistent Diagnosis? Some variation on “Intimidatingly smart Aspie nerd that can still somehow manage to dress himself in clothes that match, and use table manners, hold polite conversation, but who is burdened with an autistic and obsessive demand for ‘truth’ (precision?) that overwhelms what is already low agreeableness, resulting in unbearable arrogance if challenged, and a disturbingly uncaring attitude toward conventional formalisms he intuits as posturing but others consider themselves respectful.”

    Self orientation is due to self observation. Aspies tend to be self referential given lack of empathic comparisons. The fact that I can turn the lens of my autism on myself is no different from turning it on anything else.

    Along with aspiness, I naturally mantain emotional distance from people other than say, my present romantic relationship. I’m hypersensitive to baiting into emotional exchanges (trust relationships) at a sacrifice or cost. This unwillingness to fall for the bait of engaging in emotional reciprocity (equality) in exchange for approval is aggravating. Sure, I want to get along. I want to enjoy life. I like people. But I don’t want approval at a cost to my ‘obsessions’. I don’t value it. It’s not that I’m valuing myself. It’s just valuing truth, doing my work, creative freedom, more than approval, and far more than approval at the cost of falsehoods or tolerances.

    Women, in particular, find this aggravating because as a CEO or Exec as well as a philosopher, while I very much enjoy women’s company, I’m “immune” to female seduction into demand for their approval. I’ve had multiple women call me a sociopath because they can’t manipulate me. (I’m not, not even close).

    My self-image is just that I’m relentless, will tolerate more pain than anyone else, and that I keep on going toward my goal no matter what. It’s not that I think I”m a good person. Just the opposite. I have a lot of guilt over those many times when I haven’t been a good person. And I have more guilt over those times when it’s unintentionally caused by my aspiness (obsessive single-mindedness?). Because it’s a full-time job monitoring it, and I’m angry I failed. 😉

    The difference is that most aspies won’t work hard enough at fighting their aspiness to learn to be normal despite the pain and frustration with it. Likewise, most people won’t fight to build companies despite the pain of it. Or build intellectual fortresses or intellectual and political movements.

    I just fight on and on and on. And fighting has become ‘the way’ I achieve.

  • The Choice – Episode 12 – Popularity vs Necessity – The Problem of Conservative Anti-Intellectualism


    Script

    “I’d be more popular but conservatism is an anti-intellectual disposition, so all conservative thought leaders are, like me, conservative libertarians – meaning ‘Rule of Law’ conservatives rather than ‘Rule by Man’ conservatives, or Rule by Priesthood conservatives.”

    Trifunctionalism:
    1. Conservative Libertarians – Intellectual Rule of Law
    2. Martial Conservatives – Dominance Rule of Man
    3. Priestly Conservatives – Empathic Rule by Priesthood

    4. And the pragmatic body politic.

    As I’ve said the problem of our age requries a meal of intellectual solutions but the disenfranchised working laboring and lower middle classes want to be served comfort food they’re faliliar with – and that will continue to make them fail.

    Why? Because they don’t understand that the priestly and military emotional responses are those of FOLLOWERS not leaders.

    And ifyou want to RULE yourselves or others – you must LEAD. ANd to lead requires you can organize, govern, and rule. And you can only organize govern and rule the avanced civilization that is western civlization by law. Because law is the set of rule of behavior, whther personal, economic, civil, or political.

    Religion and Martial bind us as followers.
    The law binds us as leaders.
    And we have none.

    It’s time for adulthood.
    It’s time for realism, naturalism, and action (operationalism)
    It’s time for law.
    Military to defend that law.
    Religion to transmit that law across generations.

  • The Choice – Episode 12 – Popularity vs Necessity – The Problem of Conservative Anti-Intellectualism


    Script

    “I’d be more popular but conservatism is an anti-intellectual disposition, so all conservative thought leaders are, like me, conservative libertarians – meaning ‘Rule of Law’ conservatives rather than ‘Rule by Man’ conservatives, or Rule by Priesthood conservatives.”

    Trifunctionalism:
    1. Conservative Libertarians – Intellectual Rule of Law
    2. Martial Conservatives – Dominance Rule of Man
    3. Priestly Conservatives – Empathic Rule by Priesthood

    4. And the pragmatic body politic.

    As I’ve said the problem of our age requries a meal of intellectual solutions but the disenfranchised working laboring and lower middle classes want to be served comfort food they’re faliliar with – and that will continue to make them fail.

    Why? Because they don’t understand that the priestly and military emotional responses are those of FOLLOWERS not leaders.

    And ifyou want to RULE yourselves or others – you must LEAD. ANd to lead requires you can organize, govern, and rule. And you can only organize govern and rule the avanced civilization that is western civlization by law. Because law is the set of rule of behavior, whther personal, economic, civil, or political.

    Religion and Martial bind us as followers.
    The law binds us as leaders.
    And we have none.

    It’s time for adulthood.
    It’s time for realism, naturalism, and action (operationalism)
    It’s time for law.
    Military to defend that law.
    Religion to transmit that law across generations.

  • I Don’t Hate Anyone: It Abandons Responsibility – But Paternalism Produces Frustration and Retains Responsibility

    I DON’T HATE ANYONE: IT ABANDONS RESPONSIBILTY – WHILE PATERNALISM PRODUCES ONLY FRUSTRATION AND RETAINS RESPONSIBILITY

    [O]nce you gasp the miracle that we humans achieve anything at all with the animal instincts and the limited ability and knowlege at our disposal, the sheer terror of the reality of it, converts you from being angry with the world, to desperately wanting to parent as much of it as possible

    But we differ in i) what we should parent people in favor of: say harmony, poverty, and dysgenia vs stress, prosperity, and eugenia. ii) whether than can be done by truth, conveinient half truths, or utter deceits. iii) whether it must be done by fast or slow, iv) whether by authoritarian stick or market carrot. v) whether we can bear the truth of the necessity of controllling reproduction at the bottom.

    Yes european civ is superior because european civilization is most consious of reality, european sense making has the highest correspondence to physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and europeans have institutionalized those physical, natural, and evolutionary laws – except for our abandonement of market eugenics.

    It is possible japanese-korean civ, are now the most superior civilization having retained their ethnocentrism, superior demographics, internal high trust, martial discipline, and self control. And incorporated european science and finance, if not our heroic aesthetics (asian aesthetics are childlike).

    Why?

    The christians intentionally destroyed Stoicism and Epicureanism which would have provided us truthful mindfuless that and made us immune to the the false promsies of supernatural religion.

    We have lost the self discipline required for church, court, and commons because the postwar jewish attack on our civilization. We have lost majority male participation in the military and the requirement that political persons at the highest level have served in the military. We have lost the majority farmer as small businessman and therefore majority commercial ethics – and we are just wealtheir peasants working as tax, credit, and consumption serfs.

    So, a majority-serf population enjoying middle class consumption, who are insulated from the market by corporate size or government size, and a minority middle class of responsibilty for capital and production, and an ever growing underclass of under and unemployables, because they cannot produce anything of sufficient complexity, nor compete in the world economy to compete for status and consumption.

    And so, all but a few are lacking emotional, mental, and physical self control and fitness to do anything about it. The civilization is full of emotionally, socially, economically, politically and militarily infantile serfs whose primary hyperconsumption is the abandonment of responsibility for anything.

    So, one can ‘hate’ and share in the abandonement of responsiblity, or one can ‘parent’, and accept the responsibilty.

    My undestanding of the world is that most of it needs parenting, but most of the world can’t tolerate it, organize it, or decide how to do it.

    That’s what P-Law gives us. It tells us how to talk about and to do those things: teach, organize, and bring it into being parentally – without hate.

    So no I don’t hate people. They just frustrate me.

    That includes every group from the leftists, to the j’s to muslims, the xians, wn, ns, and beyond.

    Hate means you fall for the fallacy of equality and don’t know what to do and aren’t wiling to do it. Frustration means you you accept the necessity of hierarchy and know what to do and are willing to do it – but it’s terribly hard work.

  • I Don’t Hate Anyone: It Abandons Responsibility – But Paternalism Produces Frustration and Retains Responsibility

    I DON’T HATE ANYONE: IT ABANDONS RESPONSIBILTY – WHILE PATERNALISM PRODUCES ONLY FRUSTRATION AND RETAINS RESPONSIBILITY

    [O]nce you gasp the miracle that we humans achieve anything at all with the animal instincts and the limited ability and knowlege at our disposal, the sheer terror of the reality of it, converts you from being angry with the world, to desperately wanting to parent as much of it as possible

    But we differ in i) what we should parent people in favor of: say harmony, poverty, and dysgenia vs stress, prosperity, and eugenia. ii) whether than can be done by truth, conveinient half truths, or utter deceits. iii) whether it must be done by fast or slow, iv) whether by authoritarian stick or market carrot. v) whether we can bear the truth of the necessity of controllling reproduction at the bottom.

    Yes european civ is superior because european civilization is most consious of reality, european sense making has the highest correspondence to physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and europeans have institutionalized those physical, natural, and evolutionary laws – except for our abandonement of market eugenics.

    It is possible japanese-korean civ, are now the most superior civilization having retained their ethnocentrism, superior demographics, internal high trust, martial discipline, and self control. And incorporated european science and finance, if not our heroic aesthetics (asian aesthetics are childlike).

    Why?

    The christians intentionally destroyed Stoicism and Epicureanism which would have provided us truthful mindfuless that and made us immune to the the false promsies of supernatural religion.

    We have lost the self discipline required for church, court, and commons because the postwar jewish attack on our civilization. We have lost majority male participation in the military and the requirement that political persons at the highest level have served in the military. We have lost the majority farmer as small businessman and therefore majority commercial ethics – and we are just wealtheir peasants working as tax, credit, and consumption serfs.

    So, a majority-serf population enjoying middle class consumption, who are insulated from the market by corporate size or government size, and a minority middle class of responsibilty for capital and production, and an ever growing underclass of under and unemployables, because they cannot produce anything of sufficient complexity, nor compete in the world economy to compete for status and consumption.

    And so, all but a few are lacking emotional, mental, and physical self control and fitness to do anything about it. The civilization is full of emotionally, socially, economically, politically and militarily infantile serfs whose primary hyperconsumption is the abandonment of responsibility for anything.

    So, one can ‘hate’ and share in the abandonement of responsiblity, or one can ‘parent’, and accept the responsibilty.

    My undestanding of the world is that most of it needs parenting, but most of the world can’t tolerate it, organize it, or decide how to do it.

    That’s what P-Law gives us. It tells us how to talk about and to do those things: teach, organize, and bring it into being parentally – without hate.

    So no I don’t hate people. They just frustrate me.

    That includes every group from the leftists, to the j’s to muslims, the xians, wn, ns, and beyond.

    Hate means you fall for the fallacy of equality and don’t know what to do and aren’t wiling to do it. Frustration means you you accept the necessity of hierarchy and know what to do and are willing to do it – but it’s terribly hard work.

  • Yes, We Are Going to Have a Civil War and It’s Going to Make the French Revolution Look Tame.

    [Y]ou (the left) did it. And… you’re going to pay for it. You used the same technique of false promises of freedom from physical, natural, and evolutionary laws – demonizing the aristocracy, markets, meritocracy, truth, duty, and the natural eugenics that result.

    You repeated the destruction of the ancient world by Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, and just updated your undermining with Islamism, marxism(Judaism, bolshevism), neo marxism(Judaism), postmodernism(Christianity) in the modern world.

    You – all of you on the left – created this catastrophe because you criticized what you didn’t understand, advocated for the left’s pseudoscience, sophistry, and dysgenia. And those of us who understood hadn’t yet developed the science to explain western civilization’s methodology.

    Why didn’t you stop them? Because you too believe the lie. That western civ is an oppressor rather than a domesticator. Yet the single best action a people can take to improve their condition continuously constrains the reproduction of the bottom – which of course, disempowers the financial sector, the commercial sector, the media sector, the academy, and the state sector who are most dependent upon selling to useful idiots.

    Why? Your false promises of (a) end of scarcity and unlimited growth (a faith #1), (b) the nature of man (amoral, acquisitive, superpredator, with both masculine violence and feminine undermining. (faith #2), (c) the malleability of man (80% genetically determinant and all investments normalize out over time.) (faith #3), (d) that you had the ‘vision of the anointed’ despite never accomplishing anything that made our civilization possible: a territory, a military, a government, a state, rule of law, the only truthful population on earth, pervasive high trust because of it.

    You’re being destroyed as a class because you thought you could control the undomesticated animals you loosed with your justification of their terrorism and rebellion – you didn’t require limiting political speech policy and law to truthful reciprocal exchanges in the European tradition, that preserved natural selection within the physical, natural, evolutionary laws.

    I want y’all to understand. I’m a minor conservative thought leader. And I’m minor because I want to prevent that civil war and come to a settlement. And what that very angry very armed right wants me to do, and what I won’t do, is say ‘show up’. Because these people are going to pull a reverse french revolution on all of you. And I’m pretty sure it’s going to happen within six to nine months. And it will make the horrors of the french revolution pale by comparison. Because of the pure scale of it.

    You have no idea. You have no idea how bad it’s going to be. As bad as you can imagine, it’s a thousand times worse. And the Right doesn’t want to hear about solutions or settlement – they just want war. They nearly crucified me for just talking to and empathizing with BLM.

    And yes I”m frustrated. Because none of us on the libertarian or right appear to be able to stop it.