Form: Mini Essay

  • The Chinese Are Doing It Right – If They Succeed.

    The Chinese advantage is that they DONT have democracy.

    They have an Ethnic homogeneity, territorial isolation, military and political autonomy, a professional and ethnocentric elite and bureaucracy.

    If cured of their overpopulation, they live in one of the most choice pieces of real estate in the world – vulnerable only due to their ‘unnecessary’ population. 

    We are all victims of our first institutions. The hindus to location, demographics and mysticism, the semites to demographics, location, and authoritarian religion, the chinese to geography, state formation, and the europeans to rule of law. Each has a benefit and a weakness.

    Prussia was the restoration of the european project after the dark ages. So note how desperately the french, English, Russians, and (americans) tried to destroy it. English rule of law hadn’t time to make it across Germany. Instead the French had a tantrum and destroyed Europe. (And the Jews and now Muslims are taking advantage of the opportunity.)

    If white male still ran european civ, and prussian order, and english government, we would do the same.

    But we can’t. Why? Women’s emotions and immigrant predation.

    My work is hard to understand – at first – because it’s a system for exposing ignorance, error, bias, deceit and fraud. But once you master it,all of human history makes common sense again. It’s just opaque or confusing because of all the lies – including those we tell ourselves.

     

     

  • The Chinese Are Doing It Right – If They Succeed.

    The Chinese advantage is that they DONT have democracy.

    They have an Ethnic homogeneity, territorial isolation, military and political autonomy, a professional and ethnocentric elite and bureaucracy.

    If cured of their overpopulation, they live in one of the most choice pieces of real estate in the world – vulnerable only due to their ‘unnecessary’ population. 

    We are all victims of our first institutions. The hindus to location, demographics and mysticism, the semites to demographics, location, and authoritarian religion, the chinese to geography, state formation, and the europeans to rule of law. Each has a benefit and a weakness.

    Prussia was the restoration of the european project after the dark ages. So note how desperately the french, English, Russians, and (americans) tried to destroy it. English rule of law hadn’t time to make it across Germany. Instead the French had a tantrum and destroyed Europe. (And the Jews and now Muslims are taking advantage of the opportunity.)

    If white male still ran european civ, and prussian order, and english government, we would do the same.

    But we can’t. Why? Women’s emotions and immigrant predation.

    My work is hard to understand – at first – because it’s a system for exposing ignorance, error, bias, deceit and fraud. But once you master it,all of human history makes common sense again. It’s just opaque or confusing because of all the lies – including those we tell ourselves.

     

     

  • This is my version of ‘clean your room’ which I extend to ‘clean your civilizati

    This is my version of ‘clean your room’ which I extend to ‘clean your civilization’. Philosophy and theology are attempts at self-medication. Since we know how to perform behavioral modification, why not do what improves your life rather than makes you an addict to lies?


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-31 17:20:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322589387541106694

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322589386249277442


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    Either your model of the world is correspondent consistent and coherent or it isn’t. Why lie about it to yourselves or others? Why create fictions? Why not just seek the truth and train your motivations? (That’s what european civ required: stoicism in mind, epicurean in spirit.) https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1322588475292569601

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1322589386249277442

  • Race Difference In Evolution (Yes)

    EUROPEANS ARE MORE EVOLVED THAN AFRICANS AND SOUTH EURASIANS AND DIFFERENTLY EVOLVED FROM EAST ASIANS


    The question of body size, brain size, energy, neoteny, and aggression that permits *distributed computation*.

    OUR BRAINS ARE SHRINKING

    Neanderthals had bigger brains than us. But not bigger than early homo sapiens. They were expanding until about 10 years ago, and have gone down by 150ccm. So we’ve decreased by two standard deviations. Our skulls are thinner, and less robust. The ratio of length to width has changed as well. (cranial index). Bigger-broader, smaller-longer). Our heads are getting smaller.

    Something like 30 animals have been domesticated, and in the process, every one of them has lost brain volume — typically a 10 to 15 percent reduction compared with their wild progenitors. Domesticated animals have more gracile builds, smaller teeth, flatter faces, a more striking range of coloration and hair types — and, in many breeds, floppy ears, and curly tails. Except for those last two traits, the domesticated breeds sound a lot like us.

    What’s caused this shrinkage is selection against aggression. (and I suggest energy availability). There have been many brain-related DNA mutations seen over the past 20 millennia.

    The more individuals, the bigger the gene pool, and the greater the chance for an unusual advantageous mutation to happen. Even Darwin knew this. That’s why he recommended that animal breeders maintain large herds. You don’t have to wait so long for desirable traits to arise.

    Europeans are not as neotenically evolved as east Asians. Instead, Europeans developed middle neoteny, primarily through female selection, by selecting for light skin, light hair, gracile form – but not small body form. (although that changed in the south of Europe which did get smaller). So Europeans advertise greater neoteny without necessarily achieving east Asian levels of neotenic expression in morphology.

    Conversely, Europeans are far more neotenically evolved than Africans, more so than south Asians, and less than their East Asian equivalents the Han-Korean-Japanese.

    So yes, that’s actually the reason why we are incompatible:

    1 – Blacks, and South Asians are less evolved.
    2 – East Asians are more evolved, but paid a higher physical cost.
    3 – The open question is if we are in fact dumber than cro magnon or just less aggressive.
    4 – Or whether (as I would predict) we have sacrificed neural velocity under stress and the high energy consumption of large neural cells for lower energy consumption, smaller neural cells, and different brain chemistry.
    5 – Or whether we have traded individual intellectual capacity in small groups for distributed intellectual capacity in larger groups – which I hope isn’t the case.

    I don’t know the answer. I do know that the revolutions that came before seem to have required greater innovation than we are capable of now.

    So we should expect an increasing attack by the pseudoscientific cult of the left on neotenic evolution because it is the obvious genetic cause of human differences. And because it explains the differences in rates of gestation, maturation, and reproduction of the races, and it explains the difference in intelligence between the races, and different cultures of the races, and the different social and political demands of the races so that they can ‘mature together at the same rate’.

    Instead, we have the highest trust people in the world (Europeans) trying to host African, part African, and part Amerindian peoples which means our standard of crime and theirs are incompatible, because our standard of behavior, our standard of truthfulness, our standard of norm, tradition, law, and commons is impossible for all but a tiny fraction of them.

    This does not mean that a 120+ IQ / high conscientiousness member of a given race, that shows neotenic development (which we can easily observe in facial features and form, speech pattern, and behavior) can’t equally adapt to a european civilization. It means that only a tiny percentage of non-Europeans can do so.

    So yes ethnocentrism is necessary for ethnic Europeans – at least those of us who desire it – because devolution is the norm in post agrarian civilization.

     

     

     

     

  • Race Difference In Evolution (Yes)

    EUROPEANS ARE MORE EVOLVED THAN AFRICANS AND SOUTH EURASIANS AND DIFFERENTLY EVOLVED FROM EAST ASIANS


    The question of body size, brain size, energy, neoteny, and aggression that permits *distributed computation*.

    OUR BRAINS ARE SHRINKING

    Neanderthals had bigger brains than us. But not bigger than early homo sapiens. They were expanding until about 10 years ago, and have gone down by 150ccm. So we’ve decreased by two standard deviations. Our skulls are thinner, and less robust. The ratio of length to width has changed as well. (cranial index). Bigger-broader, smaller-longer). Our heads are getting smaller.

    Something like 30 animals have been domesticated, and in the process, every one of them has lost brain volume — typically a 10 to 15 percent reduction compared with their wild progenitors. Domesticated animals have more gracile builds, smaller teeth, flatter faces, a more striking range of coloration and hair types — and, in many breeds, floppy ears, and curly tails. Except for those last two traits, the domesticated breeds sound a lot like us.

    What’s caused this shrinkage is selection against aggression. (and I suggest energy availability). There have been many brain-related DNA mutations seen over the past 20 millennia.

    The more individuals, the bigger the gene pool, and the greater the chance for an unusual advantageous mutation to happen. Even Darwin knew this. That’s why he recommended that animal breeders maintain large herds. You don’t have to wait so long for desirable traits to arise.

    Europeans are not as neotenically evolved as east Asians. Instead, Europeans developed middle neoteny, primarily through female selection, by selecting for light skin, light hair, gracile form – but not small body form. (although that changed in the south of Europe which did get smaller). So Europeans advertise greater neoteny without necessarily achieving east Asian levels of neotenic expression in morphology.

    Conversely, Europeans are far more neotenically evolved than Africans, more so than south Asians, and less than their East Asian equivalents the Han-Korean-Japanese.

    So yes, that’s actually the reason why we are incompatible:

    1 – Blacks, and South Asians are less evolved.
    2 – East Asians are more evolved, but paid a higher physical cost.
    3 – The open question is if we are in fact dumber than cro magnon or just less aggressive.
    4 – Or whether (as I would predict) we have sacrificed neural velocity under stress and the high energy consumption of large neural cells for lower energy consumption, smaller neural cells, and different brain chemistry.
    5 – Or whether we have traded individual intellectual capacity in small groups for distributed intellectual capacity in larger groups – which I hope isn’t the case.

    I don’t know the answer. I do know that the revolutions that came before seem to have required greater innovation than we are capable of now.

    So we should expect an increasing attack by the pseudoscientific cult of the left on neotenic evolution because it is the obvious genetic cause of human differences. And because it explains the differences in rates of gestation, maturation, and reproduction of the races, and it explains the difference in intelligence between the races, and different cultures of the races, and the different social and political demands of the races so that they can ‘mature together at the same rate’.

    Instead, we have the highest trust people in the world (Europeans) trying to host African, part African, and part Amerindian peoples which means our standard of crime and theirs are incompatible, because our standard of behavior, our standard of truthfulness, our standard of norm, tradition, law, and commons is impossible for all but a tiny fraction of them.

    This does not mean that a 120+ IQ / high conscientiousness member of a given race, that shows neotenic development (which we can easily observe in facial features and form, speech pattern, and behavior) can’t equally adapt to a european civilization. It means that only a tiny percentage of non-Europeans can do so.

    So yes ethnocentrism is necessary for ethnic Europeans – at least those of us who desire it – because devolution is the norm in post agrarian civilization.

     

     

     

     

  • WHY THE RIGHT FAILS – RANT Facing the reality is beneficial for the right – so t

    WHY THE RIGHT FAILS – RANT

    Facing the reality is beneficial for the right – so that they don’t continue to repeat their failings. The truth is that nothing is going to happen. Because the left will continue with incremental destruction. You’re divided, your leaders are culled, you’re silenced, prosecuted, then disarmed.

    The evidence is that you have done nothing but fail over and over again. And you’ll do nothing except be picked off one at a time, until your current resignation returns to its source, the feminine Christian fantasy of salvation, and raging masculine Naziism that imitated it.

    Getting things done means bravery signaling as leaderless, without strategy, without plans, without tactics, without policy, without anything but fear to desperately delay while secretly praying real men will save you from your incompetence. Lost boys.

    You don’t have to be competitively superior if you use the female strategy of undermining, you just have to make the opposition lose, and the right always loses because the morons take the left’s bait, and the only solution is rule obtained by force.

    There is only one possible solution, and that is to show up in such large numbers – no matter what the personal cost – that we control the discourse, then the conflict.

    Just face it. You’re overconfident, privileged, false virtue-signaling, losers, and the sexual, social, economic, and political market has spoken: you’re in the bin. All you have going for you is that you can show up, follow orders, and fight. But you can’t even do that.

    Losers. Underemployed, sexless, futureless, undesirable, losers, larping that they’re heroes so that they don’t have to face the truth: elites have abandoned you for good reason, and you’re left to your fate: submission.

    Right Simps and Left Chimps. At least the chimps show up and fight. You talk, and talk, and talk and posture like women and do nothing. There are no gods. There are only men. And you have neither.

    You’re already out of the political pool, in the children’s end of the economic pool, and in the little plastic kiddie pool of the sex and reproduction market. If the left wins and you’re out of the gene pool. A virtual “L” sewed to your clothes. Proving their superiority to you.

    Which is why you’re the anal leakage of politics, of the workforce, of the marriage pool. You aren’t white. You’re superstitious cowering peasants wearing white masks, like you hide behind a cross and a swastika. Gutless. Stupid. Nothings that prevent European people from victory.

    Natural Selection has rendered her judgment. You are sentenced. Why? Because she has no mercy for the combination of bravado, cowardice, and stupidity. 😉

    I hope some group succeeds. 😉 Won’t happen. The left is excellent at identifying leaders and organizations and will end it. Your weakness is low trust and high skepticism combined with cowardice, so you can’t go all in and win fast. So the left always outmaneuvers you. You’re done.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-30 19:14:39 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105125332818768395

  • THE RIGHT WILL FAIL. THE LEFT WILL WIN. UNITY IMPOSIBLE AND COWARDICE UNIVERSAL

    THE RIGHT WILL FAIL. THE LEFT WILL WIN. UNITY IMPOSIBLE AND COWARDICE UNIVERSAL

    Facing the reality is beneficial for the right – so that they don’t continue to repeat their failings. The truth is that nothing is going to happen. Because the left will continue with your incremental destruction. Your leaders are culled, you’re silenced, prosecuted, then disarmed.

    And you’ll do nothing except be picked off one at a time, until your current resignation returns to its source, the pathetic Christian fantasy of salvation, and raging masculine Naziism that imitated it.

    I know you’d never show. You’d never do anything except sit behind a pew, or video game, and feel justified you were in the right. Pathetic.
    And you will never, ever, under any circumstance prove me wrong. I know your true colors. 100M cowardly little boys and 1000 men at most.

    The right isn’t going to do anything. The conservatives might try to make a compromise position. But they’ll cut you off along with the radical left. You’re done. Silencing you on media, workplace, and academy is just the first step. Red flag laws will expand into the home.

    What’s beneficial for the right-wing is to look in the mirror, and use the truth of decades of failure, fantasy ambitions, superstition and totalitarianism, posturing, divisiveness, online larping, all of it just feminized boyz begging for better men to show. There aren’t many.

    I have, we have, spent years preparing for this, and what happens? We get taken out – not by the enemy – but by the boys we’re trying to help. This is why you fail. False virtue, attention-seeking, purity spiraling. You’re spoiled children deserving of your fate.

    There are no gods. There are only men. And you have neither.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-30 16:30:03 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105124685589735517

  • The secret to buddhist mindfulness is simply to train yourself to control attent

    The secret to buddhist mindfulness is simply to train yourself to control attention by practicing feedback loops. It’s basically the same as learning to ride a bicycle except harder because it’s harder to control the feedback loop of attention. Breathing is the easiest way.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-28 22:59:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321587441980055553

    Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11 @Nationalist7346

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321586996444278785


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @TruthQuest11 @Nationalist7346 also… fyi: the brain is programmed (organized) by what its nerves are attached to in harmony with what the neural columns are next to. Temporal activity is just conscious focus. The hippocampal region organizes and calculates relative geometric positions into a model & episode.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1321586996444278785

  • Deep Reason For Eugenics

    I think …. well … you know, the whole p-program can be considered an extension of the economic revolution of accounting for the seen and unseen.

    So disambiguation by serialization and operationalization, creating a universal value-neutral logic (vocabulary, logic, and paradigm) of human behavior that is consistent, correspondent, with physical laws. Creating universal commensurability across all fields. Enabling fully accounting regardless of fields. These are just methods of full accounting of the seen and unseen. Methods of increasing the SCALE of the cognitive model of humans to correspond to the scale of human knowledge – and human cooperation (or non).

    Throughout history man – at least western man – has sought to satisfy his sense of wonder, by increasing the scale of the model and the consistency and coherence of the model.

    And the problem has been that most civilizations cannot tolerate the truth of the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws – because they are unkind to the peasantry, where the peasantry was the source of income (taxation) during the agrarian revolution.

    So that there is a continuous struggle between the demand to rise in affluence and agency and the productivity of the underclasses that resist it and drag down the civilization into a stasis because it’s against their interests. The only solution of course is matching reproductive fertily to match technological demands.

    This means furthermore that in a world where peasants are no longer needed to fight or no longer needed to farm, or even no longer needed to produce, that they have no function.

    So that the long term goal of any people that wish to pass the great filter must be one that allows civilization wide adaptation with minimum resistance.

  • THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IS FREE TO FOLLOW ITS NATURAL INCENTIVES (worth repeating) T

    THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IS FREE TO FOLLOW ITS NATURAL INCENTIVES
    (worth repeating)

    The church’s operating model is dependent upon funding by a massive ( poor ignorant dim superstitious ) peasantry needing defense from corrupt states – or those whose actions they cannot grasp.

    So yes, the church is naturally feminine and communist and was only kept in check by the facts that:

    1) The aristocracy used it as a holding company under primogeniture, funded with land grants, staffed with their non-inheriting sons, leasing land to the peasants, and managing to maintain an ignorant, illiterate, fearful, subservient peasantry.

    2) That competing religions would disrupt the church income stream, privilege, and holdings of the noble families.

    Economics in everything. Follow incentives not stories. The church industrialized lying by the combination of maintaining illiteracy, manipulation through sophistry and supernatural authority, and destroyed the works of reason, and the great civilizational achievements of the Greco-Roman revolution.

    The Church was incrementally abandoned in european civilization and became funded by Africans, South Americans, and the rest of the third world. With the collapse of european participation and funding, the transfer of income to the third world, and the demographics of the third world unable to compete in the technological age, and therefore producing continued demand for authoritarian socialism, the church has followed its interest in support of natural allies (the left, globalists, and the communists).

    The only Christian solution I can see is to complete the defeat of the catholic church in the northern hemisphere, the replacement of it with the Orthodox, which has no political ambitions, is inherently nationalistic, and purely ritualistic, and the continued bifurcation of our people into secular, pagan, orthodox, and fundamentalists and leaving the catholic church to its natural demise.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-28 02:24:53 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105110037596396507