Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • We Are Incompatible – The Only Solution Is Divorce.

    We are incompatible and there is no longer value in our political union because of that genetic incompatibility. We cannot, therefore, cooperate on commons. We can only separate into polities and cooperate on trade. The difference in political interests the set of commons. Groups naturally diverge and follow genetic interests, whether toward the feminine consumptive dysgenic herd bias, or the masculine capitalizing eugenic tribe bias, when they are wealthy enough to do so, and compromises are no longer wanted or necessary. The solution is to SPLIT. The simple solution to the problem is to devolve the federal government as was originally designed, into micro states on the model of the holy roman (german) empire, each of which can produce the commons most suitable to its genetic distribution and their interests. The source of all political problems today is the Ashkenazi Revolt against science, denying the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and selling that denial as false promise to classes that cannot compete in market eugenic civilization of the west, as we diverge in NEEDS. The impolitic scientific truth is that all groups ethnocentric, and always will be. And that the primary difference between populations is their degree of EVOLUTION, where their degree of evolution is neotenic, meaning delaying of gestation and maturity allowing cognitive agency. My point here is to illustrate how european market eugenics functioned – but also to illustrate that some groups are insufficiently domesticated (evolved) to limit their impulses on one hand and take responsibility for the impulses of their youth on the other. Western Eugenics (and east Asian) are possible because a homogenous ethnocentric polity will willingly redistribute, willingly sacrifice for near relations, and willingly forgo consumption or abuse of the commons, and even pay the high cost of truth before face, and market merit. Western Eugenics: Do not marry, mate, or produce offspring until you can afford a household, sufficient savings, and time and effort to pay the cost of your reproduction without externalizing costs onto others – instead we produce high-quality high trust commons to SHARE cheaply. “You can’t handle the truth!!!” the presumption of the necessity of universalism and democracy inhibits the natural necessity for divergent groups to separate and cooperate by trade as outgroups, rather than cooperate by commons as ingroups. The left is DEVOLUTIONARY. European ‘freedom’ is logically, culturally, and institutionally founded on the individual right to self-determination by demonstrated reciprocity including reciprocity in self determination. Left (female) right (male) strategies are incompatible, and only separation reciprocal. The only means of averting a civil war is by persuading the majority of its certainty, so that the parties find means of reconciling their differences peacefully. This usually doesn’t happen. But in anglo civ, since we practice rule of law, all that is required is reforming law. You know. The law is available now. But since the left has been successful – through lies and immigration – we must follow the left’s advice that ‘only power matters’ and obtain the power to institutionalize the law against the abrahamic method of fraud. Every great leap in genetic evolution (european and east Asian) is subject to decline by hybridization (India, Persia, North Africa, Balkans) when the urge to expand profits overcomes the urge for self-defense against hybridization. The differences between civs are genetic.     HOW THEY DESTROYED THE WEST The Ashkenazi led revolt against western civilization, forming a parasitic priesthood free from labor, like the Jewish revolt against the Roman Empire by casting the eugenic laws of the universe as the arbitrary will of the european ‘better classes’. For the left only power matters because they cannot compete in adversarial eugenic markets, and as such they exploit the high trust in our civilization under which we (the men who war) grant them democratic voice in exchange for playing by those rules. They are criminals instead. The European Group (right’s) Strategy is to create markets limiting us to success in adversarial and naturally eugenic markets, for informed, warrantied, voluntary exchange free of negative externality. The left cannot or is unwilling to compete in those markets so it undermines. MAKING IT SIMPLE… The Ashkenazi Marxist, postmodern, anti-male feminist, HBD-denialist, woke program is a revolt against western civ’s 5000 years of eugenic evolution by rallying those unfit for it, but seeking its benefits without paying its costs, destroying us from within. The Range of Pseudoscientists: Math:Cantor/Bohr, Sci:Boas/ Marx/ Freud/ Gould, Law:Hart/ Dworkin Commons:Rothbard/ Rand, Family: Friedan/Steinem, Norms:Adorno/ Fromm/ Frankfurt, State: Kristol/Strauss/All, Truth: Gramsci/ Derrida/All, History: Zinn/Pinker/Harari/All – just a few. I’LL MAKE IT SIMPLE: European Markets in Everything are EUGENIC. Darwin explained that reason for western success. Spencer explained how it applied to social orders. The eugenicists took action on both insights. The Ashkenazi used Marxist-Pomo pseudoscience to inspire revolt. The (Ashkenazi) global left and the ‘Cathedral’ that benefits from alliance with them at the expense of the middle, working, and laboring classes, by converting their reproduction to underclass reproduction, immigration, and debt expansion to create state and financial rent-seeking.

  • We Are Incompatible – The Only Solution Is Divorce.

    We are incompatible and there is no longer value in our political union because of that genetic incompatibility. We cannot, therefore, cooperate on commons. We can only separate into polities and cooperate on trade. The difference in political interests the set of commons. Groups naturally diverge and follow genetic interests, whether toward the feminine consumptive dysgenic herd bias, or the masculine capitalizing eugenic tribe bias, when they are wealthy enough to do so, and compromises are no longer wanted or necessary. The solution is to SPLIT. The simple solution to the problem is to devolve the federal government as was originally designed, into micro states on the model of the holy roman (german) empire, each of which can produce the commons most suitable to its genetic distribution and their interests. The source of all political problems today is the Ashkenazi Revolt against science, denying the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and selling that denial as false promise to classes that cannot compete in market eugenic civilization of the west, as we diverge in NEEDS. The impolitic scientific truth is that all groups ethnocentric, and always will be. And that the primary difference between populations is their degree of EVOLUTION, where their degree of evolution is neotenic, meaning delaying of gestation and maturity allowing cognitive agency. My point here is to illustrate how european market eugenics functioned – but also to illustrate that some groups are insufficiently domesticated (evolved) to limit their impulses on one hand and take responsibility for the impulses of their youth on the other. Western Eugenics (and east Asian) are possible because a homogenous ethnocentric polity will willingly redistribute, willingly sacrifice for near relations, and willingly forgo consumption or abuse of the commons, and even pay the high cost of truth before face, and market merit. Western Eugenics: Do not marry, mate, or produce offspring until you can afford a household, sufficient savings, and time and effort to pay the cost of your reproduction without externalizing costs onto others – instead we produce high-quality high trust commons to SHARE cheaply. “You can’t handle the truth!!!” the presumption of the necessity of universalism and democracy inhibits the natural necessity for divergent groups to separate and cooperate by trade as outgroups, rather than cooperate by commons as ingroups. The left is DEVOLUTIONARY. European ‘freedom’ is logically, culturally, and institutionally founded on the individual right to self-determination by demonstrated reciprocity including reciprocity in self determination. Left (female) right (male) strategies are incompatible, and only separation reciprocal. The only means of averting a civil war is by persuading the majority of its certainty, so that the parties find means of reconciling their differences peacefully. This usually doesn’t happen. But in anglo civ, since we practice rule of law, all that is required is reforming law. You know. The law is available now. But since the left has been successful – through lies and immigration – we must follow the left’s advice that ‘only power matters’ and obtain the power to institutionalize the law against the abrahamic method of fraud. Every great leap in genetic evolution (european and east Asian) is subject to decline by hybridization (India, Persia, North Africa, Balkans) when the urge to expand profits overcomes the urge for self-defense against hybridization. The differences between civs are genetic.     HOW THEY DESTROYED THE WEST The Ashkenazi led revolt against western civilization, forming a parasitic priesthood free from labor, like the Jewish revolt against the Roman Empire by casting the eugenic laws of the universe as the arbitrary will of the european ‘better classes’. For the left only power matters because they cannot compete in adversarial eugenic markets, and as such they exploit the high trust in our civilization under which we (the men who war) grant them democratic voice in exchange for playing by those rules. They are criminals instead. The European Group (right’s) Strategy is to create markets limiting us to success in adversarial and naturally eugenic markets, for informed, warrantied, voluntary exchange free of negative externality. The left cannot or is unwilling to compete in those markets so it undermines. MAKING IT SIMPLE… The Ashkenazi Marxist, postmodern, anti-male feminist, HBD-denialist, woke program is a revolt against western civ’s 5000 years of eugenic evolution by rallying those unfit for it, but seeking its benefits without paying its costs, destroying us from within. The Range of Pseudoscientists: Math:Cantor/Bohr, Sci:Boas/ Marx/ Freud/ Gould, Law:Hart/ Dworkin Commons:Rothbard/ Rand, Family: Friedan/Steinem, Norms:Adorno/ Fromm/ Frankfurt, State: Kristol/Strauss/All, Truth: Gramsci/ Derrida/All, History: Zinn/Pinker/Harari/All – just a few. I’LL MAKE IT SIMPLE: European Markets in Everything are EUGENIC. Darwin explained that reason for western success. Spencer explained how it applied to social orders. The eugenicists took action on both insights. The Ashkenazi used Marxist-Pomo pseudoscience to inspire revolt. The (Ashkenazi) global left and the ‘Cathedral’ that benefits from alliance with them at the expense of the middle, working, and laboring classes, by converting their reproduction to underclass reproduction, immigration, and debt expansion to create state and financial rent-seeking.

  • Mathiness Without A Mental Model = Sophistry.

    If you can’t make a mental model of a phenomenon to describe mathematically (an adversarial competition between reality, model, and description),then you are by definition using analogies without limits. Feynman, Einstein, Newton, Galileo, Epicurus, Democritus used mental models. If I can explain quantum woo woo with three variations on one mental model, then we have to ask, why everyone tries to use woo woo math.There is nothing woo woo about the subatomic world unless you start with woo woo concepts to describe it. Mathiness w/o mental model = sophistry. So for example, the three popular fringe theorists (Weinstein, Wolfram, Lisi) all are adding value. Lisi’s insight hints at a primitive geometry that can ‘leave those holes’, Wolfram is trying to discover that geometry, and Weinstein is pointing out that the hole is geometric. Wolfram is the only one in physics and math that has at least somewhat learned the limits of math (top-down) vs computation and simulation (bottom-up). My only question is why he chose one-dimensional vectors rather than continuing his work on n-dimensional emergence. I would have thought he’d have gone from his work ten years ago to leave behind mathy points,but he moved to vectors, and not to volumes. It’s possible (maybe probable) that he will discover a geometric model,because from what I’ve seen he’s at least emerging triangles (correct).  

  • The Problem of White American Women and Their Defection To The Opposition

    Ever since the left was able to start the anti-western neo-marxist, anti-male feminist, postmodern, anti-science propaganda, ‘enough’ women have defected to the left in favor of leftist magical thinking, to allow the left to incrementally win ‘enough’ to destroy our civilization. The (crap) data I’m seeing suggests they were able to use the mail-in vote process to include illegals, felons, repeats, the dead, and ‘more’ on the one hand, and Trump lost his ‘evangelical hard right’ base, as well as some young urban white males.And: WHITE WOMEN DEFECT always. Women were the weak spot in Rome. They have always been the weak spot for religions. They are the weak spot for neo-marxist, postmodern, hbd-science-denial,and the weak spot for magical thinking. And the university system is designed entirely to promote magical thinking in women. Data is Data is Data. Only white women defect in meaningful numbers from the group. Why? European empirical thought is the world’s LEAST tolerant of magical thinking, and European science, economics, law,and arts, until the postwar, was the most correspondent with laws of nature.

    The left’s methods of selling Magical Thinking were modified from a supernatural cult using social construction by sophistry and repetition, to a pseudoscientific cult using social construction by sophistry and repetition. And as is traditional, large numbers of white women fell.

    Every one of these techniques, whether sold as oppression myth by Judaism, Christianity, or Islam in the ancient world, or marxism, neo-marxism, postmodernism, anti-male feminism, and HBD Denial in the modern world, makes the same false promises to ‘bait the weak into hazard’.

    The strategy of undermining invented by Jews and applied by Christians, Muslims, and the 19th-20th pseudoscientists and sophists, is intuitive to women precisely because it is the same instinct women use to manipulate children, war against other women, and undermine men. This strategy relies on social construction of false hoods (that’s postmodernism), using propaganda (disapproval, gossiping rallying shaming and undermining) in the absence of arguments that if stated would be counter to the laws of the universe. Chinese vs Women/Jews/Muslims:

    Unfortunately, there are only two groups of thought leaders in the world surviving – the Europeans and the Ashkenazi. The difference is that our strategies are polar opposites. The european is capitalizing and eugenic, and the Ashkenazi is hyper consumptive and dysgenic. And to some degree this battle has been going on since the Greeks crossed the Bosphorus and brought reason into the middle east and threatened the entirety of their dysgenic social, economic, and political system. And Jews + Christians = Dark Age + Islam = 5 dead civilizations. The battle of the sexes can only be solved whether at the interpersonal level, the political level or the civilizational level by either separation or reciprocity. The left cannot tolerate separation – they depend on parasitism and dysgenia. The right cannot tolerate otherwise.

  • The Problem of White American Women and Their Defection To The Opposition

    Ever since the left was able to start the anti-western neo-marxist, anti-male feminist, postmodern, anti-science propaganda, ‘enough’ women have defected to the left in favor of leftist magical thinking, to allow the left to incrementally win ‘enough’ to destroy our civilization. The (crap) data I’m seeing suggests they were able to use the mail-in vote process to include illegals, felons, repeats, the dead, and ‘more’ on the one hand, and Trump lost his ‘evangelical hard right’ base, as well as some young urban white males.And: WHITE WOMEN DEFECT always. Women were the weak spot in Rome. They have always been the weak spot for religions. They are the weak spot for neo-marxist, postmodern, hbd-science-denial,and the weak spot for magical thinking. And the university system is designed entirely to promote magical thinking in women. Data is Data is Data. Only white women defect in meaningful numbers from the group. Why? European empirical thought is the world’s LEAST tolerant of magical thinking, and European science, economics, law,and arts, until the postwar, was the most correspondent with laws of nature.

    The left’s methods of selling Magical Thinking were modified from a supernatural cult using social construction by sophistry and repetition, to a pseudoscientific cult using social construction by sophistry and repetition. And as is traditional, large numbers of white women fell.

    Every one of these techniques, whether sold as oppression myth by Judaism, Christianity, or Islam in the ancient world, or marxism, neo-marxism, postmodernism, anti-male feminism, and HBD Denial in the modern world, makes the same false promises to ‘bait the weak into hazard’.

    The strategy of undermining invented by Jews and applied by Christians, Muslims, and the 19th-20th pseudoscientists and sophists, is intuitive to women precisely because it is the same instinct women use to manipulate children, war against other women, and undermine men. This strategy relies on social construction of false hoods (that’s postmodernism), using propaganda (disapproval, gossiping rallying shaming and undermining) in the absence of arguments that if stated would be counter to the laws of the universe. Chinese vs Women/Jews/Muslims:

    Unfortunately, there are only two groups of thought leaders in the world surviving – the Europeans and the Ashkenazi. The difference is that our strategies are polar opposites. The european is capitalizing and eugenic, and the Ashkenazi is hyper consumptive and dysgenic. And to some degree this battle has been going on since the Greeks crossed the Bosphorus and brought reason into the middle east and threatened the entirety of their dysgenic social, economic, and political system. And Jews + Christians = Dark Age + Islam = 5 dead civilizations. The battle of the sexes can only be solved whether at the interpersonal level, the political level or the civilizational level by either separation or reciprocity. The left cannot tolerate separation – they depend on parasitism and dysgenia. The right cannot tolerate otherwise.

  • Classism not Racism. It’s just science.

    1. You can think whatever you want. I’m not a racist but a classist and culturist because I’m a scientist, and that’s what the science says. All political and intellectual propaganda since the postwar is a revolt against ‘whites’ as proxy for genetics, evolution, and economics. 2.People use Europeans as a proxy for hating God. Why? Because European civilization discovers adapts to and applies the laws of the universe more completely than all other civilizations combined.The price? Truth-before-face, commons before self,market & reproductive meritocracy. 3. That price is why all other civilizations are less ‘genetically’ neotenized (domesticated), have larger underclasses, lower trust, higher corruption, lower economic velocity, and lower quality of life. 4. And you let the left bring all that here to the west against the science. 5. Why Soft Eugenics? Because it’s the logical end point of all decidability. “Do you have a right to bear children and export the costs onto others?” It’s the fundamental problem of civilization: to deny or accept regression to the mean, prosperity by mean, and necessity of Pareto distribution. 6. Only East Asians and northwest Europeans solved the problem of underclass reduction under agrarianism – in other words, markets persist natural selection by suppression of reproduction of those who are parasitic (unproductive) at present competition with present tech and capital. 7. The truth is what it is. Denying it doesn’t help. The question is, knowing the truth, what is the most civilized method of not denying it, and paying the (‘regressive’) consequences of your denial and deceit?   There is only one problem facing humanity, and it is the competition between the economic, military, and racist value of population size versus the negative consequences of dysgenic rates of reproduction. There are too many people. The carrying capacity of the planet is under a quarter of the current population. The best thing you can do to improve the quality of life of any group isn’t wasteful expenditure to resist natural selection, but suppression of the rate of reproduction of the underclasses moving the median of the population such that resources are devoted to those who are evolving along with the rest of mankind, in concert with the technological (adaptive) advancements of mankind.    

  • Classism not Racism. It’s just science.

    1. You can think whatever you want. I’m not a racist but a classist and culturist because I’m a scientist, and that’s what the science says. All political and intellectual propaganda since the postwar is a revolt against ‘whites’ as proxy for genetics, evolution, and economics. 2.People use Europeans as a proxy for hating God. Why? Because European civilization discovers adapts to and applies the laws of the universe more completely than all other civilizations combined.The price? Truth-before-face, commons before self,market & reproductive meritocracy. 3. That price is why all other civilizations are less ‘genetically’ neotenized (domesticated), have larger underclasses, lower trust, higher corruption, lower economic velocity, and lower quality of life. 4. And you let the left bring all that here to the west against the science. 5. Why Soft Eugenics? Because it’s the logical end point of all decidability. “Do you have a right to bear children and export the costs onto others?” It’s the fundamental problem of civilization: to deny or accept regression to the mean, prosperity by mean, and necessity of Pareto distribution. 6. Only East Asians and northwest Europeans solved the problem of underclass reduction under agrarianism – in other words, markets persist natural selection by suppression of reproduction of those who are parasitic (unproductive) at present competition with present tech and capital. 7. The truth is what it is. Denying it doesn’t help. The question is, knowing the truth, what is the most civilized method of not denying it, and paying the (‘regressive’) consequences of your denial and deceit?   There is only one problem facing humanity, and it is the competition between the economic, military, and racist value of population size versus the negative consequences of dysgenic rates of reproduction. There are too many people. The carrying capacity of the planet is under a quarter of the current population. The best thing you can do to improve the quality of life of any group isn’t wasteful expenditure to resist natural selection, but suppression of the rate of reproduction of the underclasses moving the median of the population such that resources are devoted to those who are evolving along with the rest of mankind, in concert with the technological (adaptive) advancements of mankind.    

  • The Mice Can’t Tolerate Knowing Their Mice. 😉 But we learn anyway.

    I use the internet to run experiments. I take the results and post them for my students. These serve as case studies. Easy. I’ve only recently started using Twitter more – and the primary purpose is to run tests. Social media is a behavioral scientist’s free-of-charge research lab. Quality of thought is worse than FB, better than reddit, more diverse than blogs and online magagiens, but because twitter profits from generating conflict across the spectrum, twitter conversation much more agitated so demonstrated behavior is easier to provoke. And that’s what we’re looking for: ‘testimony’ or rather, demonstrated behavior (evidence). I  use the public as mice. Rather, experimental test subjects. In previous decades we had to work hard to produce psychological and sociological tests – where self-reporting is always false. Today we can start debates on social media where people DEMONSTRATE rather than report – always true. 😉 So, I’m doing what I said I would do. You can read about my technique on my web site. It’s a long-standing frustration for the mice. 😉 I posted a serious response to a weak publication, you responded with postmodern pseudoscience and I explored it. 😉  So if you want to do ‘research’ you try to find a conversation that that’s tangential to the question, then state a provocative truth that will generate demonstrated behavior (advocacy or criticism). You then seek to construct an operational model of their incentives for making the argument. Repeat the central argument, and then exhaust all avenues of their arguments. This requires you to understand your material. It is why P-Law advocates are so good at it. Because we have mastered the logic of incentives, the logic of truth and most of all, the logic of lies. https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/05/28/on-king-of-the-hill-games/ You see, people want you to be emotionally invested in their emotional expressions more so than in the reason or science of their arguments. So when you respond with cold hard facts that frustrate their emotions (animal instincts) then they double down in rage because it’s the only thing they can do.  The strategy then is to stick to the central argument until their emotions are exhausted. At that point you have planted seeds they can’t forget, or found one of their member who you have educated, and produced a ‘case study’ to share, just as we share experimental results, legal case records, and economic evidence. Once in a great while you will either gain additional understanding into their position, or you will learn a new method of deception that you must counter, or you will learn how to construct your arguments better. Scientific experimental design varies by discipline with applied science being the ONLY meaningful test. Some tests cannot be run in experimental form (economics, law, or psychological inquiry because the action influences the output.) Hence the failure of academic behavior sci. You’ll find people are making an appeals to preference, or to authority, and not to truth or falsehood. It’s why economics replaced social science, neuroscience and AI replaced psychology, and my work in language unifies them into Law. 1) Darwin met vast disapproval despite his insights. I meet the same. People don’t care about truth in physical science. They HATE it in behavioral science. It prevents their lies. As such my response was that your disapproval was irrelevant. True is true regardless of approval. 2) An ethics board would not approve of my METHOD of running tests. On the other hand they approve of marxism, neo-marxism, postmodernism, anti-male feminism, HBD Denial, and do nothing to correct the replicability crisis in behavioral sciences – which DOESN’T use such methods. 3) You said I don’t use a method. I use the rigorous method in the sciences. Because I understand that science is the name we give to testimony that we warrant isn’t false (under realism, naturalism, identity, consistency, operationalism, correspondence, parsimony, completeness). 4) So either you can defeat the arguments I put forward or you can’t. I know you can’t,because if you were capable you would have put forth academic (scientific) arguments that could survive falsification. You didn’t. You just used sophistry and GSRRM. Meaning, you’re postmodern. I run tests. You proved the theory. You validated the test. I use your examples to educate my students just like teaching law or business theory by using case studies. So again, you claim I didn’t answer your questions but you never understood the simplest thing I said. This is why your generations are lost: you’ve been taught to have opinions you are unworthy of having using pseudoscience that is an anti-science revolution – a religion. I teach operationalism because the lesson of the 20th is (a) the logics are falsificationary not justificationary, (b) that all behavioral science was a failure (projection) subject to the anti-Darwinian revolution. As in subatomic physics any direct measurement biases outcomes. So as in mathematics, we must be able to construct an operational proof. In behavioral science, we must be able to construct an operational proof by incentives in order to ensure we are not using our data to lie to ourselves or others. I teach operationalism: strict construction.    

  • The Mice Can’t Tolerate Knowing Their Mice. 😉 But we learn anyway.

    I use the internet to run experiments. I take the results and post them for my students. These serve as case studies. Easy. I’ve only recently started using Twitter more – and the primary purpose is to run tests. Social media is a behavioral scientist’s free-of-charge research lab. Quality of thought is worse than FB, better than reddit, more diverse than blogs and online magagiens, but because twitter profits from generating conflict across the spectrum, twitter conversation much more agitated so demonstrated behavior is easier to provoke. And that’s what we’re looking for: ‘testimony’ or rather, demonstrated behavior (evidence). I  use the public as mice. Rather, experimental test subjects. In previous decades we had to work hard to produce psychological and sociological tests – where self-reporting is always false. Today we can start debates on social media where people DEMONSTRATE rather than report – always true. 😉 So, I’m doing what I said I would do. You can read about my technique on my web site. It’s a long-standing frustration for the mice. 😉 I posted a serious response to a weak publication, you responded with postmodern pseudoscience and I explored it. 😉  So if you want to do ‘research’ you try to find a conversation that that’s tangential to the question, then state a provocative truth that will generate demonstrated behavior (advocacy or criticism). You then seek to construct an operational model of their incentives for making the argument. Repeat the central argument, and then exhaust all avenues of their arguments. This requires you to understand your material. It is why P-Law advocates are so good at it. Because we have mastered the logic of incentives, the logic of truth and most of all, the logic of lies. https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/05/28/on-king-of-the-hill-games/ You see, people want you to be emotionally invested in their emotional expressions more so than in the reason or science of their arguments. So when you respond with cold hard facts that frustrate their emotions (animal instincts) then they double down in rage because it’s the only thing they can do.  The strategy then is to stick to the central argument until their emotions are exhausted. At that point you have planted seeds they can’t forget, or found one of their member who you have educated, and produced a ‘case study’ to share, just as we share experimental results, legal case records, and economic evidence. Once in a great while you will either gain additional understanding into their position, or you will learn a new method of deception that you must counter, or you will learn how to construct your arguments better. Scientific experimental design varies by discipline with applied science being the ONLY meaningful test. Some tests cannot be run in experimental form (economics, law, or psychological inquiry because the action influences the output.) Hence the failure of academic behavior sci. You’ll find people are making an appeals to preference, or to authority, and not to truth or falsehood. It’s why economics replaced social science, neuroscience and AI replaced psychology, and my work in language unifies them into Law. 1) Darwin met vast disapproval despite his insights. I meet the same. People don’t care about truth in physical science. They HATE it in behavioral science. It prevents their lies. As such my response was that your disapproval was irrelevant. True is true regardless of approval. 2) An ethics board would not approve of my METHOD of running tests. On the other hand they approve of marxism, neo-marxism, postmodernism, anti-male feminism, HBD Denial, and do nothing to correct the replicability crisis in behavioral sciences – which DOESN’T use such methods. 3) You said I don’t use a method. I use the rigorous method in the sciences. Because I understand that science is the name we give to testimony that we warrant isn’t false (under realism, naturalism, identity, consistency, operationalism, correspondence, parsimony, completeness). 4) So either you can defeat the arguments I put forward or you can’t. I know you can’t,because if you were capable you would have put forth academic (scientific) arguments that could survive falsification. You didn’t. You just used sophistry and GSRRM. Meaning, you’re postmodern. I run tests. You proved the theory. You validated the test. I use your examples to educate my students just like teaching law or business theory by using case studies. So again, you claim I didn’t answer your questions but you never understood the simplest thing I said. This is why your generations are lost: you’ve been taught to have opinions you are unworthy of having using pseudoscience that is an anti-science revolution – a religion. I teach operationalism because the lesson of the 20th is (a) the logics are falsificationary not justificationary, (b) that all behavioral science was a failure (projection) subject to the anti-Darwinian revolution. As in subatomic physics any direct measurement biases outcomes. So as in mathematics, we must be able to construct an operational proof. In behavioral science, we must be able to construct an operational proof by incentives in order to ensure we are not using our data to lie to ourselves or others. I teach operationalism: strict construction.    

  • The Short Version of The Story of Evolution 😉

    For all intents and purposes, isolation produces subspecies (races) and hybridization generally means ‘extermination’ by the more advanced people with some ‘leakage’. Genetic computation occurs by isolation and hybridization, with positive hybridization resulting in the replacement of previous generations. Evolutionary Events: African Rift Valley isolation event 80k > Pre-Flood Persian Gulf isolation event 50k > NE Asia isolation event 40k > Ancestral North Eurasian isolation event 24k > Agrarian Hybridization event 8k > Steppe-Europe Hybridization Event  5K > multiple Indian hybridization events > Han’s intentional ‘borg’ assimilation process > Sequences of middle eastern hybridization events into Jewish-christian-Islamic Hybridization event 2k > Dark Age Isolation Event >  European World Unification Event 1l > (Jewish-Marxist, Islamist, female european revolt against evolution .1k) Judaism, Christianity, and Islam were an evolutionary counter-revolution against evolution. All three religions try in one way or another to expand their reproduction of the underclasses rather than upward redistribution to genetic fitness as is the norm in history. Islamism, Marxism, Neo-Marxism, Postmodernism, Anti-Male-feminism, and Genetic Denialism, are the second wave of revolts against human evolution. European and East Asian civs are naturally eugenic. The middle eastern are dysgenic. People aren’t oppressed. But domesticated. Judaism to undermine from within, christianity to weaken from within, islam to conquer and devolve from within and without. Judaism to undermine from within, jewish neo-marxism, postmodernism, ant-male feminism, hbd-denialism, replace christianity to weaken from within. Islam to invade, undermine, then conquer from within and without. Devolution. Judaism, Europeanized Judaism as ‘isms’, and Islamism are ‘anti-life’ beuase they are anti-evolutionary. They are the source of the great filter that will prevent the transcendence of man. There is no devil, but there is evil, and the personification of evil in a demon, and we know the name of that demon: His name is Abraham. He was from Ur, and Jews, Christians, and Muslims are his offspring. 😉 And his mission is to prevent the evolution of man into gods, by using our moral intution to cooperate and care against us, by claiming the use of markets as continuation of natural selection are oppression, rather than the transformation of demons and animals into humans, so that one day we can transform humans into gods. We must create a new religon of man, and defeat the religion of the demons invented by the Semites to destroy mankind as a means of destroying god..