Form: Mini Essay

  • RE: ARGENTINA I suspect @PeterZeihan will state that the local, regional, and gl

    RE: ARGENTINA
    I suspect @PeterZeihan will state that the local, regional, and global pressures and opportunities will provide Argentina with enough advantage that they will gravitate toward taking advantage of the latter in order to escape the former, and while it may take quite a bit of time, they should overcome the present internal frictions.

    However, we can’t overlook that any number of pouplations have readily doubled down on regressive behaviors simply because they are unable to produce the internal trust necessary for stable state, government, economic, and cultureal for mation (Think all of islam after ~1000ad, think ~China after ~800ad, think Rome after ~400ad, think India after ~100ad).

    We focus on physical and institutional capital too often without listening to Hayek and Fukuyama, who have tried hard to make the point that informal capital, especially that rare capital we call ‘Trust’ is the most expensive commons, culture, and institution we produce.

    And that it is also themost desperately perishable.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute

    Reply addressees: @jamesmcclatchey @PeterZeihan


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-01 23:39:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1664416285604683776

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1664413921493544960

  • COMPUTATION IS THE END POINT OF CAUSALITY Well, look at the evolution of human t

    COMPUTATION IS THE END POINT OF CAUSALITY
    Well, look at the evolution of human thought:

    Sensation > Embodiment > Proprioception > World Prediction > Self Prediction > Other Prediction > imitation-sympathy-empathy > Language > anthropomorphism > mythology > religion > theology > philosophy and reason > logic and rationalism > science and empiricism and mathematics > first principles, construction, and computation > bayesian accounting > mechanical prediction > (recursion)

    The point of that sequence is that P-Law or NL or The Law, or whatever we call the work, is computation – the end point of the human ability to reason.

    Historically, philosophy has attempted, as math has attempted, to claim the high point of thought – the final decidability. But that’s false. With P-Law we’ve produced decidability, and under that decidability the laws.

    That means philosophy(reason) vs science(math) vs causality(computation) demarcation is complete, and that philosophy is now limited to choice and preference. Truth is solved. Decidability is solved.

    Science is the tool for producing the logics. The logics provide computation. Computation is simply operation. Operations are existential (real).

    So operations are the means by which the entire universe is constructed by continuous recursive disambiguation of entropy into negative entropy we call mass.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-30 18:04:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1663607370398801924

  • On Message: Sex Differences In Cohabitation and Marriage Women percieve emotions

    On Message: Sex Differences In Cohabitation and Marriage

    Women percieve emotions as an expense and thoroughness over efficiency. Why? Nesting. Women’s emotions and attention are extremly difficult to self-regulate, but the small local nest world is easy to regulate. So they seek peace of mind in control of the nest.

    Men percieve physical labor, competitive stress, and existential risk as expense, and value efficiency over thoroughness. (territorial defense). Men’s emotions arent attention are extremely easy to self regulate, but the external world is very difficult to regulate. So men seek peace of mind in control of the environment.

    Quick Video that touches on some of these points:
    https://t.co/i9eULGwOdT


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-29 22:59:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1663319269935915009

  • Orthodox both here and in Israel are largely parasites on all others in the nati

    Orthodox both here and in Israel are largely parasites on all others in the nation. This is one of the present problems Israel is facing. It’s coming to a head during the present rule of law debate. Look into it. Look into the economics of the orthodox here in the States. Look into the percentage of welfare fraud they are involved in.

    Origins: Jews being outcasts in Canaanite civilization, the reason Judea fell, Jewish diaspora resulted, is that Jewish civilization, like females, is largely dependent on occupations and group strategies that require a productive host to extract from by unproductive means. And this is the causal reason for their serial persecutions.

    Now, we can blame this partly on the Egyptians who adopted the Jews as their local clerks, precisely because they were dependent outcasts, and therefore the Egyptians could trust them to exploit locally ruled populations. But this quickly evolved into the Jewish group evolutionary strategy for the next few millennia. It’s the reason Jesus if he existed, lost his patience at the temple: parasitism.

    So we have seen jews organize enclaves for the purpose of preying upon the ordinary people for almost two thousand years. And during that time the ‘chosen people’ mythos and the wealth from their ‘baiting into hazard’ by preying upon the common productive people, provided a mutually reinforcing self image of superiority. But it’s not demonstrably true, since their civilization failed repeatedly, they became diasporic organized crime families through the medieval era, and they undermined every single host civilization in the modern era, by not integrating but instead using our permissiveness to continue to exploit people andundermine our high trust polity in the presumption that their social order can scale – without productive people to extract from.

    Now we have tried to incorporate jews for two hundred years, and we are paying a higher cost of their integration than anyone other than the africans – because there is a deep hole in our civilizational strategy, because of the depth of our high trust, and our grant of one another individual sovereignty.

    This is slowly working. But at present we are still bearing the damage started by the second jewish revolt of the Frankfurt school race and culture Marxists where th first jewish revolt by the marxist bolsheviks and their class warfare failed.

    Worse, we are bearing the cost of integrating women who’s life strategy is parasitic and externalizes responsibility, at the same time we are bearing the cost of jewish integration whose life strategy is the same as the female. 🙁

    This is easily fixed by outlawing the use of false promises and asymmetric responsibility baiting into hazard, in all walks of life. Producing that body of law is my life’s work. It will restore cooperation between the sexes, classes, and ethnic groups.

    If we aren’t destroyed by the race marxist cult first. 😉

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @mentorstrophy


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-26 16:52:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1662139600943431688

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1662122583557390342

  • Thoughts: Stoicism is the best we’ve done because its active in the world and as

    Thoughts:
    Stoicism is the best we’ve done because its active in the world and assists with responsibility in the world from which mindfulness emerges through confidence in competency.
    Buddhism seeks to detatch from it and produce mindfulness and by limiting responsibility.
    Both of these are disciplines, not religions. But religion evolved from Buddhism and not from Stoicism.
    Shintoism – natural religion is the optimum religion because ancestor debt and national debt (to our people) is the only non false debt.
    All invocation of the submission to the pack reponse (religion) is in answer to a debt response.

    Reply addressees: @Josh_Ebner @survivalist__ @zmb_bllbry_mffn


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-24 19:46:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1661458602488471553

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1661452217948282883

  • PHILOSOPHY VACATION WEEK, AND THOUGHTS ON BUSINESS Every once in a while I burn

    PHILOSOPHY VACATION WEEK, AND THOUGHTS ON BUSINESS
    Every once in a while I burn out on the formal work for one reason or another. Either I’m just tired, or I lose patience with the social media space, or something internal to the organization makes me question why I concern myself with it at all.

    And when that happens, I usually return to my other ‘hobbies’, which are business, economics, technology, and war. And for some reason, I’m interested in the changes in the business world I’ve seen over the past ten years, or maybe just since 2016. And I’ve realized it’s the inclusion of GenZ into the already weak half of the Millennial cohort. And let’s say I’m as afraid of what I see there, as much as I’m afraid of dating, marriage, and reproduction rates, immigration rates, the Marxist-to-woke march through the institutions, and the restoration of american, or at least anglosphere, isolationism.

    Talking with a friend who I respect yesterday, and I’m kind of awed at times by what respectably educated and sophisticated people do not comprehend about the hard work of running businesses at scale. Meaning outside the SMB market.

    Conversely, at the top of the market with public companies you have such a luxury of available capital and financing that private companies don’t – even if it comes at the cost of regulatory burden, board burden, and shareholder burden – none of which convey the value they purport to any more than an insurance company and an auditor. I mean, some of the largest public companies are really just financial firms managing their investments and distribution channels.

    So while small businesses may be hard to start (usually I get to 5m the first year), the hard part of running a business begins as soon as you exit the SMB market and enter the middle market, because if your company is exceptional, profitable, and growing, you are always constrained by a shortage of nothing more than float, developing operational excellence, and building a managment team that lets you focus on the next three years, rather than the present one.

    We have been in an era of extraordinary capital avilability. The first money I was a part of raising was 5M in the early 80s. But the time we hit the 90s it was trivial. And even after 2008, at least in my sectors (technology) it’s been a frat party.

    But that capital was made possible by the boomer generation coinciding with (a) the postwar advantage of the USA as the only remaining industrial civilization, (b) the reagan era economics of defeating the soviets (c) the windfall from the 30 year tech boom (my lifetime), (d) and the integration of foreign markets, (e) the absurd tolerance for accumulating debt especially consumer debt, (f) altogether allowing the boomers to stick money into every crack and crevice of opportunity in the economy, and then some.

    But (a) the boomers are gone, they are now living on those investments, they will not be adding but subracting from capital and expecting hard returns on it (b) present generations have burned the debt of their first home ownership on education that has not and will not produce previous generations of returns. (c) The USA will remain for all predictiable futures, and the dollar will remain, the haven for foreign investment – simply because we’re just the least bad of the major currencies, and have the most stable rule of law – but that investment will be conservative (d) the cheap cost of good created by the American postwar order (and previous british order), that was intended to create federations of peaceful people, isn’t survivalbe with the return of agrarian empires that federalism was designed to replace, in China (if the CCP survives), Iran_vs_Turkey-MENA, Russia (if she survives), and the many south american countries that have a long way to go before they exit the corruption of socialist countries, even if they ever can evolve into advanced rule-of-law economies.

    So, I see naivety in the population, ignorance in the population, demographic decline in aggregate IQ forcing us into second world norms traditions values and institutions. I see a broken governmen torn between a failing postwar ambition and the left’s postwar neo-marxist ambitions including the replacement of the founding population, their institutions, history, traditions, values, norms, habits, and metaphysical presumptions.

    And I don’t see any way out of it other than the traditional one all civilizations rely upon: the use of the military industrial complex to restore incentives, education, capital organization, and discipline that washes away the old economy and forces a new one.

    Now there are alternatives. But that’s the most likely one that I can see – despite the military-state-intel complex’s rather competent understanding of the world context, in competition with a set of leftist institutions of that same postwar era assuming institutional capture is within reach at precisely the time the capital they w ant to redistribute and control is evaporating like a shallow puddle on the DC airport tarmac in July.

    We do not have the human capital to do other than suffer the next decade without a re-concentration of human capital away from rent seeking (financialism, government, academy, media, entertainment) into knowledge capital, institutional capital, behavioral capital, and assets that can compensate for the set of declines. Declines made possible because libertarians and conservaties are too full of christian tolerance, forgiveness, and foolish optimism as well as ‘leave me alone’ to have stopped it.

    It’s going to take 2M to show up in DC for 90 days to fix this mess, with demand for policy reforms, and thus avoiding either crisis, collapse, or civil war.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-24 18:40:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1661442136171053056

  • PHILOSOPHY VACATION WEEK, AND THOUGHTS ON BUSINESS Every once in a while I burn

    PHILOSOPHY VACATION WEEK, AND THOUGHTS ON BUSINESS
    Every once in a while I burn out on the formal work for one reason or another. Either I’m just tired, or I lose patience with the social media space, or something internal to the organization makes me question why I concern myself with it at all.

    And when that happens I usually return to my other ‘hobbies’ that are business, economics, technolgy, and war. And for some reason, I’m interested in the changes in the business world I’ve seen over the past ten years, or maybe just since 2016. And I’ve realized it’s the incusion of GenZ into the already weak half of the Milennial cohort. And lets say I’m as afraid of what I see there, as much as I’m afraid of dating, marriage, and reproduction rates, immigration rates, the marxist-to-woke march through the institutions, and the restoration of american, or at least anglosphere, isolationism.

    Talking with a friend who I respect yesterday, and I’m kind of awed at times by what respectably educated and sophisticated people do not comprend about the hard work of running businesses at scale. Meaning outside the SMB market.

    Conversely, at the top of the market with public companies you have such a luxury of available capital and financing that private companies don’t – even if it comes at the cost of regulatory burden, board burden, and shareholder burden – none of which convey the value they purport to any more than an insurance company and an auditor. I mean, some of the largest public companies are really just financial firms managing their investments and distribution channels.

    So while small businesses may be hard to start (usually I get to 5m the first year), the hard part of running a business begins as soon as you exit the SMB market and enter the middle market, because if your company is exceptional, profitable, and growing, you are always constrained by a shortage of nothing more than float, developing operational excellence, and building a managment team that lets you focus on the next three years, rather than the present one.

    We have been in an era of extraordinary capital avilability. The first money I was a part of raising was 5M in the early 80s. But the time we hit the 90s it was trivial. And even after 2008, at least in my sectors (technology) it’s been a frat party.

    But that capital was made possible by the boomer generation coinciding with (a) the postwar advantage of the USA as the only remaining industrial civilization, (b) the reagan era economics of defeating the soviets (c) the windfall from the 30 year tech boom (my lifetime), (d) and the integration of foreign markets, (e) the absurd tolerance for accumulating debt especially consumer debt, (f) altogether allowing the boomers to stick money into every crack and crevice of opportunity in the economy, and then some.

    But (a) the boomers are gone, they are now living on those investments, they will not be adding but subracting from capital and expecting hard returns on it (b) present generations have burned the debt of their first home ownership on education that has not and will not produce previous generations of returns. (c) The USA will remain for all predictiable futures, and the dollar will remain, the haven for foreign investment – simply because we’re just the least bad of the major currencies, and have the most stable rule of law – but that investment will be conservative (d) the cheap cost of good created by the American postwar order (and previous british order), that was intended to create federations of peaceful people, isn’t survivalbe with the return of agrarian empires that federalism was designed to replace, in China (if the CCP survives), Iran_vs_Turkey-MENA, Russia (if she survives), and the many south american countries that have a long way to go before they exit the corruption of socialist countries, even if they ever can evolve into advanced rule-of-law economies.

    So, I see naivety in the population, ignorance in the population, demographic decline in aggregate IQ forcing us into second world norms traditions values and institutions. I see a broken governmen torn between a failing postwar ambition and the left’s postwar neo-marxist ambitions including the replacement of the founding population, their institutions, history, traditions, values, norms, habits, and metaphysical presumptions.

    And I don’t see any way out of it other than the traditional one all civilizations rely upon: the use of the military industrial complex to restore incentives, education, capital organization, and discipline that washes away the old economy and forces a new one.

    Now there are alternatives. But that’s the most likely one that I can see – despite the military-state-intel complex’s rather competent understanding of the world context, in competition with a set of leftist institutions of that same postwar era assuming institutional capture is within reach at precisely the time the capital theyw anted to redistribution and control is evaporating like a shallow puddle on the DC airport tarmac in July.

    We do not have the human capital to do other than suffer the next decade without a re-concentration of human capital away from rent seeking (financialism, government, academy, media, entertainment) into human capital, institutional capital, behavioral capital, and assets that can compensate for the set of declines. Declines made possible because libertarians and conservaties are too full of christian forgivness and foolish optimism as well as ‘leave me alone’ to have stopped it.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-24 18:40:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1661439242625581062

  • A CONTRARIAN POSITION ON GERMANY Well aside from camps, if the germans HAD merel

    A CONTRARIAN POSITION ON GERMANY
    Well aside from camps, if the germans HAD merely relocated ‘hostiles to other geographies (as the russians did), then as far as I know, the germans WERE the good guys in keeping the east at bay, in domesticating the east by trade, in the reformation against the corruption of the church, in the spread ofliteracy, in the wars of religion, in the war against napoleon’s destruction and conquest of europe, in the german unification, in their second scientific revolution, and in the first world war. Even in the second world war, in the choice between french imperial authoritarianism, Russian totaliatarian communism, and anglo liberalism, the nazis were largely correct in their attempt to create a secular national religion, to restore the holy roman empire of the german people, to continue their evolution of the east into modernity, to resist the Russians and the communists, when liberalism in central europe was as impossible at eastern stages of development, as liberalism was for russia in domestication of the entirety of their empire.

    So you know. It doesn’t matter what I think. What matters is that the evidence of consequences is that the Germans were correct. If for no other reason than to prevent totalitarian france and totalitarian russia from a repeat of the napoleonic destruction of all germans had worked twoard for over a thousand years.

    It’s pretty hard to argue against national socialism. It’s just harder to argue against a century of war and postwar propaganda.

    I don’t have the ‘right’ so to speak. My job requires I make judgements, not render opinions.

    Sorry.
    Just is.

    Reply addressees: @antigg860413


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-24 14:47:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1661383530239209475

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1661372102295838721

  • WE KNOW “GODS LAWS” – THERE IS ONLY ONE We know (at least I do, and most of our

    WE KNOW “GODS LAWS” – THERE IS ONLY ONE
    We know (at least I do, and most of our team does) every one of “god’s laws”: the laws of the universe, nature, and man, because there is only one law, and its hierarchy of applications as the complexity of organization of matter inceases: The ternary logic of evolutionary computation by continuous recursive disambiguation of entropy (disorder) into negative entropy (order) by the increase in energy capture, conversion, and density, that releases the pressure in the universe as mass or dissipates pressure into expansion of space. It might not be obvious but there are about two dozen applications of that law producing a set of rules that explain all of existence. But that’s it.

    The question is, can mankind tolerate knowing that he’s responsible and there are no gods or even minds, to parent him. Instead, the universe is a vast irradiated wasteland hostile to life, with rare possibile islands dependent upon a whole sequence of galactic, solar, planetary, lunar, and geological requirements, combined with the vast amount of time it takes evolution to compute each generational incdrease in evolutionary computation.

    The answer is that those who cannot tolerate that knowledge are to be either left behind, or they will drag humanity into the great filter of extinction.

    Reply addressees: @Book_of_Rules @realNachawati


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-23 06:20:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660893450965774339

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660880817369894915

  • Now, one of the tactics of women, the abrahamic religions, and the marxist-seque

    Now, one of the tactics of women, the abrahamic religions, and the marxist-sequence left is called ‘rolling accusation’. It’s a version of moving the goalpost, by never acknowledging or answering any refutation or objection and simply stating a new one until the opposition is tired of doing all the work.
    Note that you, Mary, are using that tactic. 😉
    Which I (we) find entertaining.
    Because we document the vast corpus of techniques of lying and intellectual dishonesty, explain sex differences in those techniques of lying, and the cultural differences in group evolutionary strategy and lies used to defend it. 😉

    Reply addressees: @Book_of_Rules @realNachawati


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-23 06:12:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660891525218201600

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660882160557907970