—“Christianity doesn’t provide comfort. It, like Buddhism and some other religions, is existentially terrifying. You need to grapple with a good Christian scholar like Edward Feser.”— Rik Storey
That is counter to the evidence.
The monster under the bed is terrifying if you are a child. Most of us grow out of it. Not all of us. But, most. The only thing most of us are terrified by is our irrelevance, inadequacy and smallness in the face of a universe we appear to be the only seed so far to plant in it.
Stoicism provides insulation from signaling. Buddhism provides insulation from signaling. Christianity provides insulation from signaling. Judaism provides insulation from signaling. Islam provides insulation from signaling. Hindu castes provide insulation from signaling. The reason all organized religions emerged at the same time was the increase in trade, division of labor, power distance, and the emergence of classes, and the all-too-human need, exponentially exacerbated by the feminine mind, for ‘not being left behind’.
Each of these techniques provides psychological insulation from status signals of inferiority which cause humans emotional anxiety or panic, that interferes with thought, reason, and action, and instead trains the practitioner to develop varying degrees of mindfulness at the risk of addiction to the euphoria from manufacturing a mental state (the opposite of rage), that prevents him or her from productive participation with others in the division of labor that makes his religion necessary but provides his existence.
The christian religion begins with a false debt, a false threat of not repaying it with debt servitude, and a feminine figure of love to encourage you to keep paying, in exchange for insulation from status signals, and the continuous stress of continuous adaptation to those opportunities and threats. Unfortunately just as lying and crime are cheaper means of discounting than truth and productivity, the cheap equivalent of status deception is materialism, alienation, undermining, gossiping, rallying, shaming, moralizing, psychologizing, and the rest of the feminine techniques.
The Jewish and Islamic are far worse versions – if I had the energy I’d equally enumerate them here. The Buddhist, and Hindu are far less worse, and the stoic and Epicurean entirely truthful and good, with the family cult of hearth, and the burgher cult of law, and the aristocratic cult (the one I internalize) of ancestral pagans (war, heroism, achievement), available to those fearless of status competition, material or otherwise – playing th greatest status gam of all: the power to change the world, leave a mark upon it, and to be remembered.
As for idle threats of debating ‘scholars’. The only people that try to debate me are people too stupid not to.
I would crush any theological scholar. And it would be trivial because my argument always comes down to true, operational, and empirical, whereas the faithful are stuck with the sophomoric supernatural and presumed good. And stuck with agreement on consequence. I’m certain that they would avoid debating me at all costs.
There is nothing good in our religions that cannot be explained in adult terms. But again, the difference between truth and experience exists. the temperature and frequency of red is not the same as the experience of red. There is a consequential experience from the perception of red. There is a consequential experience from the understanding of spectrum, frequency, and temperature. It is our knowledge via competition between experience and cause that prevents errors in either. All knowledge is gained by adversarial means. It must be.
But, even such, there is little value in crushing others. My goal, which is visible in the most recent podcast (#0003) is unification via-negativa. And this requires continuous research.
This is not to consent to religious attempts at dominating others by social construction of mysticism. It is by explaining why Jesus was correct and an innovator on one hand; why christianity was not his invention but others;. That those others had political intentions; that this ‘churchianity’ was for the purpose of destruction; and why the abrahamic dogmas compete by denial of one of gods laws – laws that explain the failure of these religions to achieve their false promises.
Truths:
1. The evidence of the hand of god: The Laws of nature, the natural law of sovereignty and reciprocity, the christian law of love and charity(seduction by forgiveness), and the evolutionary law of transcendence.
The Group strategy of the european peoples (explanation of adaptive, innovative, maneuver, in time.)
The political Strategy of the European Peoples (explanation of Trifunctionalism: military, law, faith)
The social strategy of the european peoples (explanation of self determination: sovereignty, reciprocity, … … markets in everything)
The Personal Strategy of the european peoples: (heroism, excellence, beauty, truth, duty, productivity, and leaving the world transformed for the better for having lived in it – seek to be remembered.)
The price of the european peoples strategy. (explanation of the prevention of the reproduction of the unproductive so that resources can be devoted to the production of commons)
The industry of the european people (profiting from the continuous domestication then transcendence (evolution) of man from animal to semi domesticated animal, to fully human, to the gods we imagine.)
This is the law of the masculine european aristocracy, whether military or legal. The church is for women, children, the old, and the weak.
Frederik was right.
—“”Christianity … is an old metaphysical fiction, stuffed with fables, contradictions and absurdities: it was spawned in the fevered imagination of the Orientals, and then spread to our Europe, where some fanatics espoused it, where some intriguers pretended to be convinced by it and where some imbeciles actually believed it”.”—Frederick to Voltaire (June 1738).
That said, it does WORK as a source of mindfulness, and the faithful make an exceptional citizenry for the aristocracy, and work force for the burghers, and are extremely honest in their participation in the law; and can be called to war with fervor without caution. And are the least-vulnerable to the second semitic destruction of western civilization by marxism, neo-marxism (cultural marxism), postmodernism, feminism and denialism.
The question is – how to save it in an era where with each passing generation only the fundamentalists survive, and those who are not fundamentalists abandon both the faith, the institutions, the traditions, and loyalty and defense of the faithful.
—”Europeans do not know how to live unless they are engaged in some great enterprise. When this is lacking, they grow petty and feeble and their souls disintegrate.”—José Ortega y Gasset, Spanish Philosopher
Truth is enough.
They have their inviolable laws.
Now we have ours.
Our natural law and absolute intolerance
The physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe.
And we begin our next great enterprise.CONTENTS
The Lesson of Comparative Civilizations
The Only Test of Your Ideas Is Law
The Natural Law of European Peoples
The Canonical Principles in The Natural Law
Creating an Optimum Government Under The Law
So What Is Our Purpose?
The Anti-Western Revolt of The Postwar Period
Their Undermining
The Judgement of The Law Against Them
The Industrialization of Lying
We Are the Only People with Guilt
The Rule of Intolerance
Truth Is a Merciless, Zero-Tolerance, Weapon.
Our Next Great Enterprise
—“And this is a war crime by female means of undermining, instead of a war crime by male means of violence. It is a war crime none the less. And a war crime that we must end, must obtain restitution for, and to punish, and to prevent from ever happening again. Because that is the function of the law: to stop a crime, to obtain restitution, to punish and prevent repetition.”—
Script:
+E0005 – Our Civilizationʼs Next Great Enterprise
Welcome to The Choice. This is Curt Doolittle. Episode 0005 – Our Civilizationʼs Next Great EnterpriseTHE LESSON OF COMPARATIVE CIVILIZATIONS
So, what is the lesson we learn from our study of history?
Despite living on the fringe of the Bronze Age, despite lacking flood river valleys, despite lacking multi-crop climates, despite smaller numbers, despite limited trade routes, despite hostile middle eastern despots, despite our folly of crossing the Bosphorus, folly of failing to suppress hostile religions, and despite the dark ages … European civilization has almost exclusively dragged humanity out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvation, hard labor, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, and the vicissitudes of nature in a few centuries in the ancient world, and a few centuries in the modern.
Because we, quite by accident, discovered the fastest means of evolution among all human groups, and what might be the fastest means possible for human groups. European peoples are able to evolve genetically, culturally, economically, technologically, faster than all other peoples … because of our traditions of sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, excellence, heroism, rule of law and jury, and markets in all aspects of life, …. where the market for suppression of parasitism we call the law, and the market for reciprocity in the production of goods, services, and information, evolve as rapidly as possible, … thereby advancing productive innovations in each others interests, … and suppression innovations in parasitism against others interests, in exchange for softly suppresses the rates of reproduction of the underclasses, … thereby allowing us to divert proceeds of our production to the commons and the higher returns for all from those commons, the most important of which are truth before face, trust, economic and innovative velocity, and the prosperity, joy, and peace of mind that results from it.
THE ONLY TEST OF YOUR IDEAS IS LAW
If you can’t write a body of policy changes, a project plan, contracts, shareholder agreements, a body of law, and a constitution to make a society function you’re just talking smack – because that is the hierarchy of algorithms that produce not a simulation but the operating system of the real world that we live in. Natural law is to human sciences, as mathematics is to physical sciences. You must program a computer via positiva, because it cannot imagine, or predict, and so cannot choose without those instructions. But you must program humanity via negativa because it can imagine, predict, and choose – which is why humans can adapt and computers can’t. And while both a computer and a human are amoral, the computer cannot choose between morality and immorality. The human can. And the purpose of our manners, ethics morals, norms, traditions, institutions and laws is to raise the cost of the immoral choices so that only moral choices remain. And that is the purpose of our laws. To create the rules of human action, cooperation, and operation that eliminate the bad so that only the good remain. And so the good is left to the continuous creativity of the people. There are many cultures that try to state the good instead of eliminate the bad. And this causes stagnation and eventual decline. Instead, continuously eliminate the bad and continuous new opportunities for good and moral will emerge from our creativity.
WHAT IS PROPERTARIANISM: “THE LAW”
“The Natural Law of European Peoples” consists of … a fully commensurable system of measurement across all disciplines, meaning a singular paradigm creating cross-disciplinary consistency;; … one that tests for reciprocity in display, word (truth) and deed (action); … by the extension of the logic of the physical sciences (realism, naturalism, equilibration) to psychological(individual), the social(group), and the metaphysical(paradigms that function as systems of measurement), sciences; … using economic terms (acquisition, cooperation, reciprocity) and logic (supply demand cost return); … thereby completing the scientific method (falsification of all dimensions possible human cognition); … and thereby completing the Aristotelian program; … and thereby providing the explanation for the success of western civilization under that program:; … consisting of sovereignty, reciprocity, including reciprocity in word: truth – … and the markets that result from their universal enforcement, … and the evolutionary velocity (adaptation, innovation) that results from those markets. …
Because while we were first more often in innovation than all other civilizations combined; … but whether we were first or not never mattered; … because we were fastest. … fastest to adapt to continuous change. … and our high tolerance for change … but as fragile in each era – because our advantage exposed our one weakness: our tolerance. … for the tolerance we grant each other, is a vulnerability easily exploited by our enemies – enemies who do not wish to adopt our ways but destroy them and us, and our continued evolution of mankind, along with them.
THE CANONICAL PRINCIPLES IN THE NATURAL LAW OF SOVEREIGNS.
We have a few canonical ideas that Iʼll ask your patience while I list. They are in that discipline we call truth – or what we call epistemology, cooperation between us – or what we call ethics, and cooperation in groups – in what we call politics.
IN TRUTH THESE IDEAS ARE
1. Commensurability: Definitions by Disambiguation by Serialization and Operationalization
2. Grammars
3. Truth: Satisfaction of demand for infallibility.
4. Testimony: Due diligence against perceivable dimensions.IN ETHICS THESE IDEAS ARE
5. Reciprocity: Due diligence against incentive to retaliate.
6. Property In Toto: Measurements of Demonstrated interests
7. Compatibilism: Gender and class division of perception, cognition, memory, advocacy, and cooperation.
8. Trifunctionalism: Three possible means of coercion, produces three competing specializations of elites.IN POLITICS THESE IDEAS ARE
9. OPTIMUM GOVERNMENT: rule of law, monarchy as judge of last resort, houses for regions, classes, genders, with one family one vote – adapting to authority under threat, markets under peace, and redistribution during windfalls.
10. Transcendence: Evolutionary necessity ‘to become the red queen’ – we may never stop nor never rest.
11. Western Group Evolutionary strategy is “OODA” meaning technology, maneuver and initiative. This strategy is created by demand for excellence and beauty, heroism and duty, truth and oath, sovereignty and reciprocity, rule of law and jury, and markets in everything: association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, polities, and war – while suppressing the reproduction of the underclasses, and devoting the surpluses to the production of commons, and the multiples for all that result. This allows a people to compete by the production of commons – which few others can.CREATING AN OPTIMUM GOVERNMENT
You can create any form of government with P-law you just have to state it truthfully and reciprocally in a constitution. Europeans, have always used theory. The republican government is just a jury at scale. The multi-house republican government is just a jury for each class at scale. A republican government refers to elected representatives. But that is all. It doesn’t tell us who does the electing. And it doesn’t state the strengths, weaknesses, and limits of republican governments. But the limit of any democratic government is homogeneity and scale. To create prosperity we incrementally add to the division of labor.
As the division of labor increases the division of political interest diverges. The homogeneity of the people limits the conflict between those interests and the heterogeneity of the people increases the heterogeneity of those interests. So heterogeneity breaks down democratic processes and generates demand for authority instead. When the democratic process fails, people resort to political activism outside of the government as we see today at the cost of truth, reciprocity, harmony and the civil society creating the chaos we see today.
We are too tolerant of competitors to rule of law (false promise, baiting into hazard), homogeneity, and markets in everything, including markets in political representatives as proxies for markets for political policy. We should be ruthlessly intolerant of those competitors. The general presumption was that we would elect people who were demonstrably capable in the making of policy (the senate as the professionals) and people who were capable in limiting the popular acceptability of policy (house of representatives as the jury) together continuing the adversarialism of our ancestral argument before the jury – but the house was given too much power, and changing the constitution creating the popular election of senators destroyed the professionalism of the senate, and gave via positiva power to the jury (house).
The optimum form of representative government is rule of law of natural law, constitutional monarchy as judge of last resort (veto, nullification, dismissal power), a cabinet of professional executives (appointed by the senate vetoed by the monarchy), and houses of parliament including one for regions, one for business and industry, and either one family under one household one vote, or two houses separated into labor and mothers, if under one person one vote.
The constitution fully enumerates rights and obligations, and requires strict construction of legislation and regulation, and that the court does not veto the legislation and regulation, and that the monarchy does not veto the legislation and regulation. In P-Law we correctly label legislation as ‘contracts of the commons’. There is only one law, and and the findings of the law under that law.
The alternative optimum form of government would eliminate the representatives and therefore the power of political parties and special interests, and provide the people with collective(propositional) and transactional (line item) veto. This is the optimum form of government and is now possible due to technology. This would eliminate the house of representatives, and limit the senate to representatives of the governors of the several states OR, use the governors of the several states as the senators.
The constitution and the law provide a sliding scale of authority from the senate (republic-production) in ordinary times, the monarchy in times of war(concentration), and the houses or people in times of windfalls (redistribution) which is a minor improvement on the roman model. This entire system is predicated upon a universal militia, a constitution of natural law that they swear to defend, and an independent judiciary sufficiently self-auditing, and sufficiently fearful of the militia that the court can adjudicate disputes under the law.
SO WHAT IS OUR PURPOSE?
He who can defend a thing, owns a thing. He who can destroy a thing controls a thing. The men who can defend or destroy, always own and control things. The question is only whether they act to control things they own. This is why a universal militia is required to produce rule of law – the power to deny power. And this is why only western man has rule of law – individual sovereignty. And with the introduction of metal, the spear, then the sword, then the bow, then the rifle, the militia increasingly obtained power, to deny power. The purpose of the militia is to create the power to deny power, so that no one else has the power to control things or destroy things – leaving only sovereignty and reciprocity under the natural law as means of survival. Therefore the host of men must exercise control of things in order to prevent control of things, leaving only the natural law, and the markets for reciprocity within them.
THE UNDERMINING OF THE MASCULINE BY MAGICAL THINKING
During the anti-western revolt of the postwar period to present, The military was shut out of politics. Then men’s organizations shut off and out of civil society. Then the family undermined to shut men out of the family. Then manliness shut out of education. Then men and manliness shut out of discourse. And only once that was accomplished could the enemy fully remove masculine european sense making: realism, naturalism, operationalism and our heroism and duty, Excellence and Beauty, Truth and reciprocity, Law and Jury, and markets and eugenics –
How was it done? By persistent, relentless undermining – the warfare strategy of the human female. It was all by design. The design to restore the pre-civilizational strategy of the female and the herd. A design driven by instinct not reason. The revolt against western civilizationsʼ eugenics that made possible our historical achievements. However, there are no female civilizations for reason – they cannot survive. Yet they try over and over again to fail. Why? “A Predisposition to magical thinking.” The predisposition to magical thinking is as relentless as the predisposition to undermine. Neither Eve nor Pandora, nor Cassandra for that matter, received the punishment they deserved. … Until now.
THE PURPOSE OF IMMIGRATION AND DIVERSITY IS TO UNDERMINING USING OUR WEAKNESS – OUR TOLERANCE
Are calls for dramatically increasing cultural diversity essentially calls for the replacing of Western Civilization with something else?
DEMOCRACY
Democracy does not grant you right of conquest by immigration or reproduction or propaganda, or conversion. but is limited to the choice of preferences of commons given the persistent scarcity of resources. within the strategy of the North Sea People, put forth in the Constitution: Rule of Law of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, and Tort producing market meritocracy, self sufficiency, and the natural sorting of the classes by their value to one another in the polity. The rest of the world does not practice rule of law of sovereignty, reciprocity, and tort – producing market meritocracy. You are welcome to go elsewhere in this world if you prefer the alternatives – all of which have failed – which is why you have invaded us. So you have, group by group, invaded. reproduced, propagandized. promised impossible falsehoods to, and converted peoples, such that you have used our constitution and our democratic process. not as a means of selecting returns on commons, but to systematically destroy the Rule of Law of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, and Tort producing market meritocracy. self -sufficiency, and the natural sorting of the classes by their value to one another in the polity.
THEY UNDERMINED …
The roman empire was undermined by the same (((People))) by the same means, by selling similar fictionalisms to women and the underclasses, and rapid immigration overwhelming the military, which was what made Romans disciplined, invested in the civilization, and with shared values and experiences. In this era, we have seen marxism, cultural marxism, so-called scientific socialism, postmodernism, and the industrialization of lying, using the same grammar and arguments, only this time with promise of economic, status, and political achievement, instead of after death.
Make no mistake about it, in the years during and after the conquest of judea the insurrection against the aristocracy was aggressively pursued by conversion of the underclasses and as always, women – who are more susceptible to fantastic ideas due to the high frequency of psychosis and solipsism (about 1/3 of women, but approaching 40% in the west), and the rest conform to their standard. (another example of the most intolerant wins – even more so among women.) That the same process has been underway, and aggressively pursued in the postwar era.
The result in the ancient world was the destruction of all major civilizations from africa to persia to rome, with a feeble byzantine city surviving by virtue of geography and wealth. Under Johnson the (((left))) was able to both destroy the black family through russian style relocation, turn our cities into wastelands for having done so, reversing tradition and aggressively immigrating the underclasses, so that they (((Left))) could achieve by immigration that which could not be achieved by their ideas.
The purpose of the (((Left))) is genocide of western peoples, and destruction of western civilization. And this is a war crime by female means of undermining, instead of a war crime by male means of violence. It is a war crime none the less. And a war crime that we must end, must obtain restitution for, and to punish, and to prevent from ever happening again. Because that is the function of the law: to stop a crime, to obtain restitution, to punish and prevent repetition.
THE JUDGEMENT OF THE LAW – ON THE LEFT
0. Reciprocity is the only reason for both sides to refrain from predation, parasitism, or boycott – cooperation or the option to cooperate is more valuable than noncooperation, and the prevention of future cooperation.
1. We create reciprocity via negativa by not imposing costs on others demonstrated interests
2. The name we use for Demonstrated interests is property.
3. In P-Law we use property in toto as the definition of property, meaning the empirical evidence of what demonstrated interests people defend.
4. We are all dependent upon the informational commons for information.
5. Some of us will defend the informational commons (or any commons) from other’s abuse of it. Some will not.
6. When you make a truth claim to others, or others make a truth claim to you, the person making the claim can, if he errs, biases, justifies, or deceives, violates reciprocity with the audience (what we call unethical), causes you to harm the informational commons as a consequence (by externality), and if he makes that claim in public, harms the informational commons as well, and therefore violates reciprocity in the commons (what we call immorality).
7. P-Law provides a definition of truth, and the means of falsifying (testing) statements for truthfulness by tests of testifiable, consistency, operational possibility, correspondence, rationality, reciprocity, completeness, full accounting, and possibility of warranty, and possibility of restitution upon error or deceit. 8. Marxism, neo-marxism (cultural marxism), postmodernism, feminism, and hbd-denialism, are all attempts at deception by:
(a) claiming european self determination (sovereignty, reciprocity), tripartism (military, legal-commercial), and religious(family-faithful), mediated by law, and limiting us to markets, so that we preserve natural selection by demonstrated behavior, and devoting the proceeds to the production of commons, thereby maintaining the health,prosperity, and wealth of the people, and their competitive advantage is oppression, when all other peoples that did not do so were mired in poverty and suffering.
(b) that the solution was communism, or socialism, that would end our natural selection, our prosperity, and our competitive advantage, and our ability to drag mankind out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, hard labor, starvation, disease, suffering, and victimization by nature – when all civilizations that have tried any form of equality have died.
(c) that to bring about communism, socialism, and the reversal of evolutionary transcendence, it was necessary to undermine our civilization at every level. Anti-militarism to undermine our military tripartism. Atheism to undermine our religious tripartism. Anti-rule of law to undermine not only our tripartism but the means by which we resolved disputes between the classes. Marxism to undermine the markets and cooperation between the classes. Cultural Marxism to undermine our culture, values, myths, traditions, and arts. Feminism to undermine the family as the compromise between the genders given our different reproductive strategies and biological differences. Postmodernism to undermine our ability to use social pressure to force conformity into realism, naturalism, operationalism, reciprocity, truthful speech, and defense of the commons so that it was optimum for the production of high trust citizenry; and again, postmodernism to deny the existence of truth or truthful speech – when truthful speech is the primary reason for not only our high trust society but our ‘european means of sense-making’ that made empiricism our laws, democratic participation, our science, medicine, and technology, possible. Postmodernism to use language for any purpose by which to obtain political power – abandoning all need for consistency, correspondence, rationality and liability. Political correctness to undermine the truth of the substantial differences between our advanced, neotenic, genetically, informationally, normatively, culturally, traditionally, and institutional superior people, so that they can be conquered quietly and slowly. Using immigration to reverse our darwinian history. Using frailty in our law and democracy to capture our territory and institutions. Using the academy to indoctrinate two generations of marxist-postmodernist-feminist-HBD-denialist “Priests and Priestesses” to indoctrinate our children by manufacturing their ignorance, feminizing our males, and making obese both genders. That’s only part of what they’ve done. I’ve just run out of tolerance for listing their crimes. What price? What is the cost of the damage they have done? What was the cost of the dark ages? What was the cost of the lost civilizations of the ancient world destroyed by islamist lies?THE INDUSTRIALIZATION OF LYING AND ASSEMBLY LINE OF FRAUD
Scientific discovery slowed after the 19th century, although technological development taking advantage of it has continued in the twentieth century. The question is why? But we know why…. The purposeful destruction of European sense-making in order to deny physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe. The, and that denial and destruction was achieved by the most influential technological development of the late nineteenth and the 20th century – the use of pseudoscience, using the new means of communication, to produce the industrialization of lying. The Freudians and Boasians Manufacturing Pseudoscience The Marxists Manufacturing Pseudoscience. The Frankfurt School manufacturing Propaganda; The Academy Selling Diplomas as Class Indulgences; Mass Market Consumer Media selling status competition; The financial sector selling debt to finance it.. Taking advantage of Emancipated but Unregulated Women’s Urges; The Majoritarian Democratic State using fiat currency selling Rents: Producing The Assembly Line of Pseudoscientific Fraud. Critical Theory for example, isnʼt a science; itʼs a fraud – just as monotheism was a fraud. Both were manufactured to specifications of deceit most desired by women and the underclasses that have less ability to control their impulses: false promises of utopia — first in an afterlife, and second in the present. Monotheism contributed to a dark age of ignorance by illiteracy and biblical propaganda. Pseudoscience has begun a dark age of ignorance by overloading reason and experience and history with pseudoscientific propaganda. The history of western civilization consists of the incremental suppression of parasitism from all walks of life by use of the westʼs unique, empirical, common, judge discovered natural law. We create both via positive markets in good services, and commons, as well as markets for the three systems of elites: martial-state, judicial-commercial, and public intellectual-faith. Except this time the faith sold was pseudoscience and sophistry. Western Man domesticated himself just as he had plants and animals before. And both our aristocracy our people profited from the process. But, man was not exploited — he was domesticated from an animal to a human through generations of cultural selection pressure and aggressive culling of malcontents and free riders. Todayʼs underclasses and single women love the consequential prosperity of that domestication but lie to themselves about the cause.
JUDGEMENT OF THE LAW
If the informational, normative, traditional, and institutional commons is common property of a people, then the (((anti-western left))) is at best, an organized crime syndicate invading and conquering from within, and at worst an act of war in violation of the Westphalian peace – under which Europeans agreed to domesticate warfare. And as such these people are prosecutable for war crimes, and we shall have our restitution.
WE ARE THE ONLY PEOPLE WITH GUILT
Westerners project when we think about others and religion. We are the only people with guilt. (Internal prepolicing of behavior based on it being “wrong”) Everyone else is only concerned with the shame of being discovered. Any study of religion or morals that only studies the west or only sees or through a western lens is seriously flawed. We never hear guilt of the French for their war against Europe, the jews, the Russians, the Muslims, Mongols, or Chinese? We dragged mankind kicking and screaming out of primitivism and they hate us for it. We neednʼt feel guilt for doing it despite all our flaws. We should instead shame them for not doing despite with theirs.
THE RULE OF INTOLERANCE
—“The minority rule will show us how it all it takes is a small number of intolerant virtuous people with skin in the game, in the form of courage, for society to function properly.”— Taleb
A monument is a claim of investment in a territory. A church or temple is a claim on the norms, traditions, and laws used in a territory. There is no coexistence possible between conflicts.
THE MOST INTOLERANT AND BOTTOM WILL WIN.
The solution is for us to stop being reasonable. Stop compromising and start being intolerant and objective. The most intolerant win, and that needs to be us. Natural law gives us the tools to be intolerant and objective in our demands. Transcendence by Truth is the most intolerant religion of all. And … The Most Intolerant Wins.
TRUTH IS A MERCILESS, ZERO-TOLERANCE, WEAPON.
The Most Intolerant Wins. We have been subject to form of intolerance – intolerance for the truth. But Truth is merciless. Truth is the scientific, legal, political, educational, and religious means of defeating the enemy. But Truth is not a selective weapon. It is indiscriminate – a weapon of zero tolerance. It will destroy the group strategy of the european left just as thoroughly as the group strategy of judaism, and islam, and second-generation Abrahamic religions: marxism (Judaism), feminism (denialism), and postmodernism (Christianity), and fundamentalist islam, and their dependence upon false promises justified by the sophisms of pilpul(via positive) and critique(via negative). The only way to defeat intolerance of civilization is by being even more intolerant of deceit and non-reciprocal costs. Absolute intolerance for irreciprocity in display word and deed. Truth is enough. They have their religious laws. Now we have ours. Our natural law and absolute intolerance The physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe.
OUR NEXT GREAT ENTERPRISE
Western civilization specialized in the continuous production of agency. We emphasize sovereignty. But sovereignty is something we grant one another through reciprocity. Agency over the self exists or it doesn’t – independent of others. Agency is necessary for sovereignty otherwise one cannot self insure. If you cannot self insure then others must insure you out of self defense. If others must insure you then you are dependent upon them as a child upon a parent. You are not sovereign agent, and cannot reciprocally insure those with agency – and you especially cannot insure them against yourself. Stoicism attempts to produce agency. All other religions do not – they produce avoidance or escapism – with shintoism the closest peer looking backward rather than forward, and the original Buddhism the closest ambition – mindfulness but not agency. And Buddhism does not maintain the western charter demanding heroism, and speaking truth regardless of the consequences to the dominance (competence) hierarchy. If you master our natural law you will have intellectual agency – all human experience is then explicable in operational terms, and the world coherent and comprehensible. If you master stoicism (self authoring) then you will develop intuitionistic and emotional agency. If you maintain diet and physical fitness – particularly team sports – you will develop physical agency. If you exchange sovereignty with others who do the same, then you will be sovereign. Rome had almost completed the development of a new religion when the Abrahamists worked diligently to undermine the great aristocratic civilizations. The lesson of Constantine is never let anyone other than a member of a noble family that has retained noble status in marriage hold office – ever. The lesson of the Abrahamic revolt against civilization, is that we must suppress all forms of supernaturalism, sophisms (pseudo-rationalism), and pseudosciences. And the only way to do that is the use of the LAW: the organized use of force to suppress imposition of costs upon the private and common, existential and informational, by using the courts as a market for truth, thereby empowering all people to suppress falsehoods. Which leads us to our charter, and I”ll quote Ortega y Gasset:
—”Europeans do not know how to live unless they are engaged in some great enterprise. When this is lacking, they grow petty and feeble and their souls disintegrate.”—José Ortega y Gasset, Spanish Philosopher
This is our next great enterprise. To rid our neighborhoods, our cities, our counties, our nations, our civilization, and humanity of the abrahamic deceits whether they be supernatural, sophistry, or pseudoscience. We have incrementally suppressed the evil in mankind by forcible domestication of genes and behavior in the ancient world and in the modern. The revolt against us in the ancient world brought about a dark age – we were far too tolerant. The abrahamic revolt against us in the modern world using collectivist pseudoscience and postmodern sophism, and the systematic use of pilpul and critique in the reputation destruction of our great civilization – a civilization that has dragged humanity out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvation, hard labor, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, and the vicissitudes of nature.
This revolt against civilization, has not yet been stopped – we have been too tolerant. We are raiders, pirates. and conquerors by nature and tradition, and while we have sought to make the world a market limiting conflict to economic competition for relative wealth and prestige – you, the left, have demonstrated that you are unable, and unfit for such peerage. So you are unfit to cohabitate with us. Unfit to trade with us. And only fit for Separation, Rule, or Defeat by us.
There will be no Second Semitic Dark Age. Minorities always rule, and the most intolerant minority most willing to enforce their preference wins. This general rule of political orders is that The most intolerant wins, and the most tolerant loses. We must rule by our law, out of self defense, and drag mankind kicking and screaming once again by transcendence into the gods we may yet be, in a universe hostile to all but gods, in a brief period of geological and astronomical peace during which we can seize the opportunity.
Transcendence by Agency, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, Markets in Everything: the continuous calculation of our ascent into godhood – and absolute intolerance of anything in opposition. Others may have our rule if they ask. But they may not deprive us of our own.
Rule in concert with physical, natural, and evolutionary laws And zero tolerance.
We gave them a chance and they all failed. Worse they conducted a war against from within by abusing our tolerance. Itʼs time for prosecution, judgement, restitution, punishment, and prevention.
This is Curt Doolittle
Thank you for listening.
—”Europeans do not know how to live unless they are engaged in some great enterprise. When this is lacking, they grow petty and feeble and their souls disintegrate.”—José Ortega y Gasset, Spanish Philosopher
Truth is enough.
They have their inviolable laws.
Now we have ours.
Our natural law and absolute intolerance
The physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe.
And we begin our next great enterprise.CONTENTS
The Lesson of Comparative Civilizations
The Only Test of Your Ideas Is Law
The Natural Law of European Peoples
The Canonical Principles in The Natural Law
Creating an Optimum Government Under The Law
So What Is Our Purpose?
The Anti-Western Revolt of The Postwar Period
Their Undermining
The Judgement of The Law Against Them
The Industrialization of Lying
We Are the Only People with Guilt
The Rule of Intolerance
Truth Is a Merciless, Zero-Tolerance, Weapon.
Our Next Great Enterprise
—“And this is a war crime by female means of undermining, instead of a war crime by male means of violence. It is a war crime none the less. And a war crime that we must end, must obtain restitution for, and to punish, and to prevent from ever happening again. Because that is the function of the law: to stop a crime, to obtain restitution, to punish and prevent repetition.”—
Script:
+E0005 – Our Civilizationʼs Next Great Enterprise
Welcome to The Choice. This is Curt Doolittle. Episode 0005 – Our Civilizationʼs Next Great EnterpriseTHE LESSON OF COMPARATIVE CIVILIZATIONS
So, what is the lesson we learn from our study of history?
Despite living on the fringe of the Bronze Age, despite lacking flood river valleys, despite lacking multi-crop climates, despite smaller numbers, despite limited trade routes, despite hostile middle eastern despots, despite our folly of crossing the Bosphorus, folly of failing to suppress hostile religions, and despite the dark ages … European civilization has almost exclusively dragged humanity out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvation, hard labor, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, and the vicissitudes of nature in a few centuries in the ancient world, and a few centuries in the modern.
Because we, quite by accident, discovered the fastest means of evolution among all human groups, and what might be the fastest means possible for human groups. European peoples are able to evolve genetically, culturally, economically, technologically, faster than all other peoples … because of our traditions of sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, excellence, heroism, rule of law and jury, and markets in all aspects of life, …. where the market for suppression of parasitism we call the law, and the market for reciprocity in the production of goods, services, and information, evolve as rapidly as possible, … thereby advancing productive innovations in each others interests, … and suppression innovations in parasitism against others interests, in exchange for softly suppresses the rates of reproduction of the underclasses, … thereby allowing us to divert proceeds of our production to the commons and the higher returns for all from those commons, the most important of which are truth before face, trust, economic and innovative velocity, and the prosperity, joy, and peace of mind that results from it.
THE ONLY TEST OF YOUR IDEAS IS LAW
If you can’t write a body of policy changes, a project plan, contracts, shareholder agreements, a body of law, and a constitution to make a society function you’re just talking smack – because that is the hierarchy of algorithms that produce not a simulation but the operating system of the real world that we live in. Natural law is to human sciences, as mathematics is to physical sciences. You must program a computer via positiva, because it cannot imagine, or predict, and so cannot choose without those instructions. But you must program humanity via negativa because it can imagine, predict, and choose – which is why humans can adapt and computers can’t. And while both a computer and a human are amoral, the computer cannot choose between morality and immorality. The human can. And the purpose of our manners, ethics morals, norms, traditions, institutions and laws is to raise the cost of the immoral choices so that only moral choices remain. And that is the purpose of our laws. To create the rules of human action, cooperation, and operation that eliminate the bad so that only the good remain. And so the good is left to the continuous creativity of the people. There are many cultures that try to state the good instead of eliminate the bad. And this causes stagnation and eventual decline. Instead, continuously eliminate the bad and continuous new opportunities for good and moral will emerge from our creativity.
WHAT IS PROPERTARIANISM: “THE LAW”
“The Natural Law of European Peoples” consists of … a fully commensurable system of measurement across all disciplines, meaning a singular paradigm creating cross-disciplinary consistency;; … one that tests for reciprocity in display, word (truth) and deed (action); … by the extension of the logic of the physical sciences (realism, naturalism, equilibration) to psychological(individual), the social(group), and the metaphysical(paradigms that function as systems of measurement), sciences; … using economic terms (acquisition, cooperation, reciprocity) and logic (supply demand cost return); … thereby completing the scientific method (falsification of all dimensions possible human cognition); … and thereby completing the Aristotelian program; … and thereby providing the explanation for the success of western civilization under that program:; … consisting of sovereignty, reciprocity, including reciprocity in word: truth – … and the markets that result from their universal enforcement, … and the evolutionary velocity (adaptation, innovation) that results from those markets. …
Because while we were first more often in innovation than all other civilizations combined; … but whether we were first or not never mattered; … because we were fastest. … fastest to adapt to continuous change. … and our high tolerance for change … but as fragile in each era – because our advantage exposed our one weakness: our tolerance. … for the tolerance we grant each other, is a vulnerability easily exploited by our enemies – enemies who do not wish to adopt our ways but destroy them and us, and our continued evolution of mankind, along with them.
THE CANONICAL PRINCIPLES IN THE NATURAL LAW OF SOVEREIGNS.
We have a few canonical ideas that Iʼll ask your patience while I list. They are in that discipline we call truth – or what we call epistemology, cooperation between us – or what we call ethics, and cooperation in groups – in what we call politics.
IN TRUTH THESE IDEAS ARE
1. Commensurability: Definitions by Disambiguation by Serialization and Operationalization
2. Grammars
3. Truth: Satisfaction of demand for infallibility.
4. Testimony: Due diligence against perceivable dimensions.IN ETHICS THESE IDEAS ARE
5. Reciprocity: Due diligence against incentive to retaliate.
6. Property In Toto: Measurements of Demonstrated interests
7. Compatibilism: Gender and class division of perception, cognition, memory, advocacy, and cooperation.
8. Trifunctionalism: Three possible means of coercion, produces three competing specializations of elites.IN POLITICS THESE IDEAS ARE
9. OPTIMUM GOVERNMENT: rule of law, monarchy as judge of last resort, houses for regions, classes, genders, with one family one vote – adapting to authority under threat, markets under peace, and redistribution during windfalls.
10. Transcendence: Evolutionary necessity ‘to become the red queen’ – we may never stop nor never rest.
11. Western Group Evolutionary strategy is “OODA” meaning technology, maneuver and initiative. This strategy is created by demand for excellence and beauty, heroism and duty, truth and oath, sovereignty and reciprocity, rule of law and jury, and markets in everything: association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, polities, and war – while suppressing the reproduction of the underclasses, and devoting the surpluses to the production of commons, and the multiples for all that result. This allows a people to compete by the production of commons – which few others can.CREATING AN OPTIMUM GOVERNMENT
You can create any form of government with P-law you just have to state it truthfully and reciprocally in a constitution. Europeans, have always used theory. The republican government is just a jury at scale. The multi-house republican government is just a jury for each class at scale. A republican government refers to elected representatives. But that is all. It doesn’t tell us who does the electing. And it doesn’t state the strengths, weaknesses, and limits of republican governments. But the limit of any democratic government is homogeneity and scale. To create prosperity we incrementally add to the division of labor.
As the division of labor increases the division of political interest diverges. The homogeneity of the people limits the conflict between those interests and the heterogeneity of the people increases the heterogeneity of those interests. So heterogeneity breaks down democratic processes and generates demand for authority instead. When the democratic process fails, people resort to political activism outside of the government as we see today at the cost of truth, reciprocity, harmony and the civil society creating the chaos we see today.
We are too tolerant of competitors to rule of law (false promise, baiting into hazard), homogeneity, and markets in everything, including markets in political representatives as proxies for markets for political policy. We should be ruthlessly intolerant of those competitors. The general presumption was that we would elect people who were demonstrably capable in the making of policy (the senate as the professionals) and people who were capable in limiting the popular acceptability of policy (house of representatives as the jury) together continuing the adversarialism of our ancestral argument before the jury – but the house was given too much power, and changing the constitution creating the popular election of senators destroyed the professionalism of the senate, and gave via positiva power to the jury (house).
The optimum form of representative government is rule of law of natural law, constitutional monarchy as judge of last resort (veto, nullification, dismissal power), a cabinet of professional executives (appointed by the senate vetoed by the monarchy), and houses of parliament including one for regions, one for business and industry, and either one family under one household one vote, or two houses separated into labor and mothers, if under one person one vote.
The constitution fully enumerates rights and obligations, and requires strict construction of legislation and regulation, and that the court does not veto the legislation and regulation, and that the monarchy does not veto the legislation and regulation. In P-Law we correctly label legislation as ‘contracts of the commons’. There is only one law, and and the findings of the law under that law.
The alternative optimum form of government would eliminate the representatives and therefore the power of political parties and special interests, and provide the people with collective(propositional) and transactional (line item) veto. This is the optimum form of government and is now possible due to technology. This would eliminate the house of representatives, and limit the senate to representatives of the governors of the several states OR, use the governors of the several states as the senators.
The constitution and the law provide a sliding scale of authority from the senate (republic-production) in ordinary times, the monarchy in times of war(concentration), and the houses or people in times of windfalls (redistribution) which is a minor improvement on the roman model. This entire system is predicated upon a universal militia, a constitution of natural law that they swear to defend, and an independent judiciary sufficiently self-auditing, and sufficiently fearful of the militia that the court can adjudicate disputes under the law.
SO WHAT IS OUR PURPOSE?
He who can defend a thing, owns a thing. He who can destroy a thing controls a thing. The men who can defend or destroy, always own and control things. The question is only whether they act to control things they own. This is why a universal militia is required to produce rule of law – the power to deny power. And this is why only western man has rule of law – individual sovereignty. And with the introduction of metal, the spear, then the sword, then the bow, then the rifle, the militia increasingly obtained power, to deny power. The purpose of the militia is to create the power to deny power, so that no one else has the power to control things or destroy things – leaving only sovereignty and reciprocity under the natural law as means of survival. Therefore the host of men must exercise control of things in order to prevent control of things, leaving only the natural law, and the markets for reciprocity within them.
THE UNDERMINING OF THE MASCULINE BY MAGICAL THINKING
During the anti-western revolt of the postwar period to present, The military was shut out of politics. Then men’s organizations shut off and out of civil society. Then the family undermined to shut men out of the family. Then manliness shut out of education. Then men and manliness shut out of discourse. And only once that was accomplished could the enemy fully remove masculine european sense making: realism, naturalism, operationalism and our heroism and duty, Excellence and Beauty, Truth and reciprocity, Law and Jury, and markets and eugenics –
How was it done? By persistent, relentless undermining – the warfare strategy of the human female. It was all by design. The design to restore the pre-civilizational strategy of the female and the herd. A design driven by instinct not reason. The revolt against western civilizationsʼ eugenics that made possible our historical achievements. However, there are no female civilizations for reason – they cannot survive. Yet they try over and over again to fail. Why? “A Predisposition to magical thinking.” The predisposition to magical thinking is as relentless as the predisposition to undermine. Neither Eve nor Pandora, nor Cassandra for that matter, received the punishment they deserved. … Until now.
THE PURPOSE OF IMMIGRATION AND DIVERSITY IS TO UNDERMINING USING OUR WEAKNESS – OUR TOLERANCE
Are calls for dramatically increasing cultural diversity essentially calls for the replacing of Western Civilization with something else?
DEMOCRACY
Democracy does not grant you right of conquest by immigration or reproduction or propaganda, or conversion. but is limited to the choice of preferences of commons given the persistent scarcity of resources. within the strategy of the North Sea People, put forth in the Constitution: Rule of Law of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, and Tort producing market meritocracy, self sufficiency, and the natural sorting of the classes by their value to one another in the polity. The rest of the world does not practice rule of law of sovereignty, reciprocity, and tort – producing market meritocracy. You are welcome to go elsewhere in this world if you prefer the alternatives – all of which have failed – which is why you have invaded us. So you have, group by group, invaded. reproduced, propagandized. promised impossible falsehoods to, and converted peoples, such that you have used our constitution and our democratic process. not as a means of selecting returns on commons, but to systematically destroy the Rule of Law of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, and Tort producing market meritocracy. self -sufficiency, and the natural sorting of the classes by their value to one another in the polity.
THEY UNDERMINED …
The roman empire was undermined by the same (((People))) by the same means, by selling similar fictionalisms to women and the underclasses, and rapid immigration overwhelming the military, which was what made Romans disciplined, invested in the civilization, and with shared values and experiences. In this era, we have seen marxism, cultural marxism, so-called scientific socialism, postmodernism, and the industrialization of lying, using the same grammar and arguments, only this time with promise of economic, status, and political achievement, instead of after death.
Make no mistake about it, in the years during and after the conquest of judea the insurrection against the aristocracy was aggressively pursued by conversion of the underclasses and as always, women – who are more susceptible to fantastic ideas due to the high frequency of psychosis and solipsism (about 1/3 of women, but approaching 40% in the west), and the rest conform to their standard. (another example of the most intolerant wins – even more so among women.) That the same process has been underway, and aggressively pursued in the postwar era.
The result in the ancient world was the destruction of all major civilizations from africa to persia to rome, with a feeble byzantine city surviving by virtue of geography and wealth. Under Johnson the (((left))) was able to both destroy the black family through russian style relocation, turn our cities into wastelands for having done so, reversing tradition and aggressively immigrating the underclasses, so that they (((Left))) could achieve by immigration that which could not be achieved by their ideas.
The purpose of the (((Left))) is genocide of western peoples, and destruction of western civilization. And this is a war crime by female means of undermining, instead of a war crime by male means of violence. It is a war crime none the less. And a war crime that we must end, must obtain restitution for, and to punish, and to prevent from ever happening again. Because that is the function of the law: to stop a crime, to obtain restitution, to punish and prevent repetition.
THE JUDGEMENT OF THE LAW – ON THE LEFT
0. Reciprocity is the only reason for both sides to refrain from predation, parasitism, or boycott – cooperation or the option to cooperate is more valuable than noncooperation, and the prevention of future cooperation.
1. We create reciprocity via negativa by not imposing costs on others demonstrated interests
2. The name we use for Demonstrated interests is property.
3. In P-Law we use property in toto as the definition of property, meaning the empirical evidence of what demonstrated interests people defend.
4. We are all dependent upon the informational commons for information.
5. Some of us will defend the informational commons (or any commons) from other’s abuse of it. Some will not.
6. When you make a truth claim to others, or others make a truth claim to you, the person making the claim can, if he errs, biases, justifies, or deceives, violates reciprocity with the audience (what we call unethical), causes you to harm the informational commons as a consequence (by externality), and if he makes that claim in public, harms the informational commons as well, and therefore violates reciprocity in the commons (what we call immorality).
7. P-Law provides a definition of truth, and the means of falsifying (testing) statements for truthfulness by tests of testifiable, consistency, operational possibility, correspondence, rationality, reciprocity, completeness, full accounting, and possibility of warranty, and possibility of restitution upon error or deceit. 8. Marxism, neo-marxism (cultural marxism), postmodernism, feminism, and hbd-denialism, are all attempts at deception by:
(a) claiming european self determination (sovereignty, reciprocity), tripartism (military, legal-commercial), and religious(family-faithful), mediated by law, and limiting us to markets, so that we preserve natural selection by demonstrated behavior, and devoting the proceeds to the production of commons, thereby maintaining the health,prosperity, and wealth of the people, and their competitive advantage is oppression, when all other peoples that did not do so were mired in poverty and suffering.
(b) that the solution was communism, or socialism, that would end our natural selection, our prosperity, and our competitive advantage, and our ability to drag mankind out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, hard labor, starvation, disease, suffering, and victimization by nature – when all civilizations that have tried any form of equality have died.
(c) that to bring about communism, socialism, and the reversal of evolutionary transcendence, it was necessary to undermine our civilization at every level. Anti-militarism to undermine our military tripartism. Atheism to undermine our religious tripartism. Anti-rule of law to undermine not only our tripartism but the means by which we resolved disputes between the classes. Marxism to undermine the markets and cooperation between the classes. Cultural Marxism to undermine our culture, values, myths, traditions, and arts. Feminism to undermine the family as the compromise between the genders given our different reproductive strategies and biological differences. Postmodernism to undermine our ability to use social pressure to force conformity into realism, naturalism, operationalism, reciprocity, truthful speech, and defense of the commons so that it was optimum for the production of high trust citizenry; and again, postmodernism to deny the existence of truth or truthful speech – when truthful speech is the primary reason for not only our high trust society but our ‘european means of sense-making’ that made empiricism our laws, democratic participation, our science, medicine, and technology, possible. Postmodernism to use language for any purpose by which to obtain political power – abandoning all need for consistency, correspondence, rationality and liability. Political correctness to undermine the truth of the substantial differences between our advanced, neotenic, genetically, informationally, normatively, culturally, traditionally, and institutional superior people, so that they can be conquered quietly and slowly. Using immigration to reverse our darwinian history. Using frailty in our law and democracy to capture our territory and institutions. Using the academy to indoctrinate two generations of marxist-postmodernist-feminist-HBD-denialist “Priests and Priestesses” to indoctrinate our children by manufacturing their ignorance, feminizing our males, and making obese both genders. That’s only part of what they’ve done. I’ve just run out of tolerance for listing their crimes. What price? What is the cost of the damage they have done? What was the cost of the dark ages? What was the cost of the lost civilizations of the ancient world destroyed by islamist lies?THE INDUSTRIALIZATION OF LYING AND ASSEMBLY LINE OF FRAUD
Scientific discovery slowed after the 19th century, although technological development taking advantage of it has continued in the twentieth century. The question is why? But we know why…. The purposeful destruction of European sense-making in order to deny physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe. The, and that denial and destruction was achieved by the most influential technological development of the late nineteenth and the 20th century – the use of pseudoscience, using the new means of communication, to produce the industrialization of lying. The Freudians and Boasians Manufacturing Pseudoscience The Marxists Manufacturing Pseudoscience. The Frankfurt School manufacturing Propaganda; The Academy Selling Diplomas as Class Indulgences; Mass Market Consumer Media selling status competition; The financial sector selling debt to finance it.. Taking advantage of Emancipated but Unregulated Women’s Urges; The Majoritarian Democratic State using fiat currency selling Rents: Producing The Assembly Line of Pseudoscientific Fraud. Critical Theory for example, isnʼt a science; itʼs a fraud – just as monotheism was a fraud. Both were manufactured to specifications of deceit most desired by women and the underclasses that have less ability to control their impulses: false promises of utopia — first in an afterlife, and second in the present. Monotheism contributed to a dark age of ignorance by illiteracy and biblical propaganda. Pseudoscience has begun a dark age of ignorance by overloading reason and experience and history with pseudoscientific propaganda. The history of western civilization consists of the incremental suppression of parasitism from all walks of life by use of the westʼs unique, empirical, common, judge discovered natural law. We create both via positive markets in good services, and commons, as well as markets for the three systems of elites: martial-state, judicial-commercial, and public intellectual-faith. Except this time the faith sold was pseudoscience and sophistry. Western Man domesticated himself just as he had plants and animals before. And both our aristocracy our people profited from the process. But, man was not exploited — he was domesticated from an animal to a human through generations of cultural selection pressure and aggressive culling of malcontents and free riders. Todayʼs underclasses and single women love the consequential prosperity of that domestication but lie to themselves about the cause.
JUDGEMENT OF THE LAW
If the informational, normative, traditional, and institutional commons is common property of a people, then the (((anti-western left))) is at best, an organized crime syndicate invading and conquering from within, and at worst an act of war in violation of the Westphalian peace – under which Europeans agreed to domesticate warfare. And as such these people are prosecutable for war crimes, and we shall have our restitution.
WE ARE THE ONLY PEOPLE WITH GUILT
Westerners project when we think about others and religion. We are the only people with guilt. (Internal prepolicing of behavior based on it being “wrong”) Everyone else is only concerned with the shame of being discovered. Any study of religion or morals that only studies the west or only sees or through a western lens is seriously flawed. We never hear guilt of the French for their war against Europe, the jews, the Russians, the Muslims, Mongols, or Chinese? We dragged mankind kicking and screaming out of primitivism and they hate us for it. We neednʼt feel guilt for doing it despite all our flaws. We should instead shame them for not doing despite with theirs.
THE RULE OF INTOLERANCE
—“The minority rule will show us how it all it takes is a small number of intolerant virtuous people with skin in the game, in the form of courage, for society to function properly.”— Taleb
A monument is a claim of investment in a territory. A church or temple is a claim on the norms, traditions, and laws used in a territory. There is no coexistence possible between conflicts.
THE MOST INTOLERANT AND BOTTOM WILL WIN.
The solution is for us to stop being reasonable. Stop compromising and start being intolerant and objective. The most intolerant win, and that needs to be us. Natural law gives us the tools to be intolerant and objective in our demands. Transcendence by Truth is the most intolerant religion of all. And … The Most Intolerant Wins.
TRUTH IS A MERCILESS, ZERO-TOLERANCE, WEAPON.
The Most Intolerant Wins. We have been subject to form of intolerance – intolerance for the truth. But Truth is merciless. Truth is the scientific, legal, political, educational, and religious means of defeating the enemy. But Truth is not a selective weapon. It is indiscriminate – a weapon of zero tolerance. It will destroy the group strategy of the european left just as thoroughly as the group strategy of judaism, and islam, and second-generation Abrahamic religions: marxism (Judaism), feminism (denialism), and postmodernism (Christianity), and fundamentalist islam, and their dependence upon false promises justified by the sophisms of pilpul(via positive) and critique(via negative). The only way to defeat intolerance of civilization is by being even more intolerant of deceit and non-reciprocal costs. Absolute intolerance for irreciprocity in display word and deed. Truth is enough. They have their religious laws. Now we have ours. Our natural law and absolute intolerance The physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe.
OUR NEXT GREAT ENTERPRISE
Western civilization specialized in the continuous production of agency. We emphasize sovereignty. But sovereignty is something we grant one another through reciprocity. Agency over the self exists or it doesn’t – independent of others. Agency is necessary for sovereignty otherwise one cannot self insure. If you cannot self insure then others must insure you out of self defense. If others must insure you then you are dependent upon them as a child upon a parent. You are not sovereign agent, and cannot reciprocally insure those with agency – and you especially cannot insure them against yourself. Stoicism attempts to produce agency. All other religions do not – they produce avoidance or escapism – with shintoism the closest peer looking backward rather than forward, and the original Buddhism the closest ambition – mindfulness but not agency. And Buddhism does not maintain the western charter demanding heroism, and speaking truth regardless of the consequences to the dominance (competence) hierarchy. If you master our natural law you will have intellectual agency – all human experience is then explicable in operational terms, and the world coherent and comprehensible. If you master stoicism (self authoring) then you will develop intuitionistic and emotional agency. If you maintain diet and physical fitness – particularly team sports – you will develop physical agency. If you exchange sovereignty with others who do the same, then you will be sovereign. Rome had almost completed the development of a new religion when the Abrahamists worked diligently to undermine the great aristocratic civilizations. The lesson of Constantine is never let anyone other than a member of a noble family that has retained noble status in marriage hold office – ever. The lesson of the Abrahamic revolt against civilization, is that we must suppress all forms of supernaturalism, sophisms (pseudo-rationalism), and pseudosciences. And the only way to do that is the use of the LAW: the organized use of force to suppress imposition of costs upon the private and common, existential and informational, by using the courts as a market for truth, thereby empowering all people to suppress falsehoods. Which leads us to our charter, and I”ll quote Ortega y Gasset:
—”Europeans do not know how to live unless they are engaged in some great enterprise. When this is lacking, they grow petty and feeble and their souls disintegrate.”—José Ortega y Gasset, Spanish Philosopher
This is our next great enterprise. To rid our neighborhoods, our cities, our counties, our nations, our civilization, and humanity of the abrahamic deceits whether they be supernatural, sophistry, or pseudoscience. We have incrementally suppressed the evil in mankind by forcible domestication of genes and behavior in the ancient world and in the modern. The revolt against us in the ancient world brought about a dark age – we were far too tolerant. The abrahamic revolt against us in the modern world using collectivist pseudoscience and postmodern sophism, and the systematic use of pilpul and critique in the reputation destruction of our great civilization – a civilization that has dragged humanity out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvation, hard labor, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, and the vicissitudes of nature.
This revolt against civilization, has not yet been stopped – we have been too tolerant. We are raiders, pirates. and conquerors by nature and tradition, and while we have sought to make the world a market limiting conflict to economic competition for relative wealth and prestige – you, the left, have demonstrated that you are unable, and unfit for such peerage. So you are unfit to cohabitate with us. Unfit to trade with us. And only fit for Separation, Rule, or Defeat by us.
There will be no Second Semitic Dark Age. Minorities always rule, and the most intolerant minority most willing to enforce their preference wins. This general rule of political orders is that The most intolerant wins, and the most tolerant loses. We must rule by our law, out of self defense, and drag mankind kicking and screaming once again by transcendence into the gods we may yet be, in a universe hostile to all but gods, in a brief period of geological and astronomical peace during which we can seize the opportunity.
Transcendence by Agency, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, Markets in Everything: the continuous calculation of our ascent into godhood – and absolute intolerance of anything in opposition. Others may have our rule if they ask. But they may not deprive us of our own.
Rule in concert with physical, natural, and evolutionary laws And zero tolerance.
We gave them a chance and they all failed. Worse they conducted a war against from within by abusing our tolerance. Itʼs time for prosecution, judgement, restitution, punishment, and prevention.
This is Curt Doolittle
Thank you for listening.
WHAT IS IT THAT CHRISTIANITY – OR ANY RELIGION – PROVIDES?
(it’s really simple)(understangind all religion)
—“Christianity doesn’t provide comfort. It, like Buddhism and some other religions, is existentially terrifying. You need to grapple with a good Christian scholar like Edward Feser.”— Rik Storey
That is counter to the evidence.
The monster under the bed is terrifying if you are a child. Most of us grow out of it. Not all of us. But, most. The only thing most of us are terrified by is our irrelevance, inadequacy and smallness in the face of a universe we appear to be the only seed so far to plant in it.
Stoicism provides insulation from signaling. Buddhism provides insulation from signaling. Christianity provides insulation from signaling. Judaism provides insulation from signaling. Islam provides insulation from signaling. Hindu castes provide insulation from signaling. The reason all organized religions emerged at the same time was the increase in trade, division of labor, power distance, and the emergence of classes, and the all-too-human need, exponentially exacerbated by the feminine mind, for ‘not being left behind’.
Each of these techniques provides psychological insulation from status signals of inferiority which cause humans emotional anxiety or panic, that interferes with thought, reason, and action, and instead trains the practitioner to develop varying degrees of mindfulness at the risk of addiction to the euphoria from manufacturing a mental state (the opposite of rage), that prevents him or her from productive participation with others in the division of labor that makes his religion necessary but provides his existence.
The christian religion begins with a false debt, a false threat of not repaying it with debt servitude, and a feminine figure of love to encourage you to keep paying, in exchange for insulation from status signals, and the continuous stress of continuous adaptation to those opportunities and threats. Unfortunately just as lying and crime are cheaper means of discounting than truth and productivity, the cheap equivalent of status deception is materialism, alienation, undermining, gossiping, rallying, shaming, moralizing, psychologizing, and the rest of the feminine techniques.
The Jewish and Islamic are far worse versions – if I had the energy I’d equally enumerate them here. The Buddhist, and Hindu are far less worse, and the stoic and Epicurean entirely truthful and good, with the family cult of hearth, and the burgher cult of law, and the aristocratic cult (the one I internalize) of ancestral pagans (war, heroism, achievement), available to those fearless of status competition, material or otherwise – playing th greatest status gam of all: the power to change the world, leave a mark upon it, and to be remembered.
As for idle threats of debating ‘scholars’. The only people that try to debate me are people too stupid not to.
I would crush any theological scholar. And it would be trivial because my argument always comes down to true, operational, and empirical, whereas the faithful are stuck with the sophomoric supernatural and presumed good. And stuck with agreement on consequence. I’m certain that they would avoid debating me at all costs.
There is nothing good in our religions that cannot be explained in adult terms. But again, the difference between truth and experience exists. The temperature and frequency of red is not the same as the experience of red. There is a consequential experience from the perception of red. There is a consequential experience from the understanding of spectrum, frequency, and temperature. It is our knowledge via competition between experience and cause that prevents errors in either. All knowledge is gained by adversarial means. It must be.
But, even such, there is little value in crushing others. My goal, which is visible in the most recent podcast (#0003) is unification via-negativa. And this effort requires continuous research. Which is what I do here: continuous improvement by trial and error, over and over again, for greater and greater precision and parsimony.
This is not to say I consent to religious attempts at dominating others by social construction of mysticism. I won’t and can’t buy into the social construction of the illusion. It is by explaining why Jesus was correct and an innovator on one hand; why christianity was not his invention but others;. That those others had political intentions; that this ‘churchianity’ was for the purpose of destruction; and why the abrahamic dogmas compete by denial of one of gods laws – laws that explain the failure of these religions to achieve their false promises.
Truths:
1. The evidence of the hand of god: The Laws of nature, the natural law of sovereignty and reciprocity, the christian law of love and charity(seduction by forgiveness), and the evolutionary law of transcendence.
2. The Group strategy of the european peoples
(explanation of adaptive, innovative, maneuver, in time.)
3. The political Strategy of the European Peoples
(explanation of Trifunctionalism: military, law, faith)
4. The social strategy of the european peoples
(explanation of self determination: sovereignty, reciprocity, … … markets in everything)
5. The Personal Strategy of the european peoples:
(heroism, excellence, beauty, truth, duty, productivity, and leaving the world transformed for the better for having lived in it – seek to be remembered.)
6. The price of the european peoples strategy.
(explanation of the prevention of the reproduction of the unproductive so that resources can be devoted to the production of commons)
7. The industry of the european people
(profiting from the continuous domestication then transcendence (evolution) of man from animal to semi domesticated animal, to fully human, to the gods we imagine.)
This is the law of the masculine european aristocracy, whether military or legal. The church is for women, children, the old, and the weak.
Frederik was right.
—“”Christianity … is an old metaphysical fiction, stuffed with fables, contradictions and absurdities: it was spawned in the fevered imagination of the Orientals, and then spread to our Europe, where some fanatics espoused it, where some intriguers pretended to be convinced by it and where some imbeciles actually believed it”.”—Frederick to Voltaire (June 1738).
That said, it does WORK as a source of mindfulness, and the faithful make an exceptional citizenry for the aristocracy, and work force for the burghers, and are extremely honest in their participation in the law; and can be called to war with fervor without caution. And are the least-vulnerable to the second semitic destruction of western civilization by marxism, neo-marxism (cultural marxism), postmodernism, feminism and denialism.
The question is – how to save it in an era where with each passing generation only the fundamentalists survive, and those who are not fundamentalists abandon both the faith, the institutions, the traditions, and loyalty and defense of the faithful.
(from elsewhere) (pls move to christian propertarians group)
(no anti-christian signaling pls)
Great Questions. Thank you.
It is difficult to transition between Theological, Philosophical, and Legal-Scientific thought. This is because the ‘tests’ (theological obedience, philosophical choice, and legal-scientific decidability in matters of conflict) in each system of thought vary from wisdom to choice to necessity. To think in terms of law and science means eliminating what is false and irreciprocal so only the true and reciprocal (good) remain. So while the theological attempts to sculpt with clay, the legal-scientific attempts to carve away stone. This difference between the positive and negative is a difficult transition for the faithful, just as the reverse is a difficult transition for the legal-scientific.
The difference between spiritual (emotional, imaginary, and intuited) and material (intellectual, actionable, and observable) is well understood in the philosophical literature as the difference between experience and action. experience and observation overlap but the Positive information from Experience, and the Negative information from Action are not the same. There is more ‘felt’ with experience than is observed. Both Faith and Science depend upon this difference. Faith to say ‘there is more to life than the material”, and law-Science ‘there is means of settling conflict by the observable and material’.
Lastly, there is a difference between P-law (the natural law of sovereignty and reciprocity within the limits of proportionality) and my opinion. I have opinion. The law consists of what amount to ‘proofs’ of decidability under tests of sovereignty reciprocity and proportionality. So don’t confuse the law with my opinion.
That’s not true. Law doesn’t promote it prohibits. Science doesn’t promote it explains. We explain why jesus’ teachings were true and an innovation. We state it in scientific terms. Christianity is compatible with natural law, extends natural law, and contributes to high trust commercial society with middle class majority ethics. As such Propertarianism makes other religions illegal because they are not compatible with natural law and jesus’ extension of natural law. So we don’t necessarily promote christianity we prohibit competitors. We do not consider practicing heathen (love of nature and ancestors), pagan (love of heroes and archetypes), and christian (love of god) together as incompatible. We understand this as the evolution of religion from familial, to tribal to cultural to political – which is the evidence of the evolution of religion.
There are three sets of laws that God has shown us with evidence of his hand. The laws of nature, the natural law of reciprocity, and the evolutionary law of transcendence. Fundamentalist (literalist) Christianity is not compatible with Laws of Nature (science), and because of this, incompatible with the evolutionary law of Transcendence. The laws of nature are evidence of god’s hand. So wherever religion is incompatible with God’s hand then the men who wrote that religion erred. I seek to solve the problem of the incompatibility of religion with the evidence of God’s hand. This leads one to the conclusion that the deists are right and jesus was right and the jews and muslims and church doctrinists were wrong – but wrong only because they were doing the best they could with the primitive knowledge of god’s hand they had at the time.
The basics underlying christian faith (god, soul, jesus teachings, ten commandments as property rights, and devotion) are all compatible with the evidence of god’s hand, in one way or another. And that the doctrine does succeed in causing the faithful to *behave* in accordance with god’s hand.
–“How does Propertarianism account for the dignity of the human person by virtue of their potential for relationship with God versus their potential for advancing civilization?”—
We say it in scientific terms: if you demonstrate by your actions that you follow the evidence of god’s hand, and do not act counter to the evidence of gods hand then you are due dignity and respect – just as those who do not, do no deserve dignity and respect. However, your experience is not observable, only your actions. How you believe and feel is not observable and decidable by other than your actions. If you do not treat others as jesus would demand, then you are not christian regardless of what you feel and believe. There are many christians who use christianity as a means of doing nothing at all because others are not conforming to their demands. This is the ultimate selfishness, ultimate deceit, ultimately unchristian denial of jesus’s teaching, and ultimate heresy. These people are not christian. They are evil in christian garb.
There are hundreds of christian sects and all that they share is some point on the spectrum between priority for the tyrannical god of the old testament semites that jesus tried to reform, and the loving god evident in jesus’ behavior and teaching. Your faith is in your mind. Your behavior exists and is observable. So in this sense, Propertarianism (God’s natural law of sovereignty and reciprocity within the limits of proportionality) judges your actions because no law can judge your mind.
—“1. I don’t think Christianity is argued in the same way as any other faiths (moral baiting), like I tried to say, it is the unique and unrepeatable Christian response to suffering and relationship that really converts and ‘saves souls’.”—
As an example, the presumption that man’s soul needs saving is the creation of a false debt. You will live a better life, cause those around you to live a better life, by following the teachings of jesus, and thereby insulating yourself and others from the animal impulses within us all. If you do so you will save your soul from emotional suffering in this world and the next. To save yourself from physical suffering requires more than saving yourself from emotional suffering. That is where science, technology, and medicine provide what faith does not.
—“2. Christianity civilized the West and not the other way around. I don’t understand the idea that early Christianity was another religion of warfare from within. Christianity was spread by its own blood, not the blood of others.”—
Why did christianity(a jewish heresy) spread among europeans, rabbinical judaism among jews, and islam (a christian heresy) among arabs and non-europeans? Because of what these people were beforehand. It is simply not true that other than a tiny minority accepted christianity willingly. This is church mythos. In all cases it was imposed upon them by leaders who found political value in it, a useful tool for political control of people, and a literate administrative class in the priesthood to do so. even during the high middle ages the documentary record looks a lot like “political correctness” is practiced today: the common people gave lip service, the urban people went along, and the upper classes virtue signaled, with a minority of purists truly devoted to the faith just like today. Those who write write history. Fortunately we have a lot of documentation from outside of the church and the writings of these people are decidedly ‘medieval’, right up until the enlightenment.
—“3. The Church was always meant to lead the state, not compete with it. Like I said, the latter was embedded in the former (even when it deviated from its philosophy in practice).”—
The church was forcibly imposed on europe by the greeks after they defeated rome and reconquered it, closed the schools, killed or outcast the philosophers, and destroyed the arts, temples, literature, and knowledge of the greco-roman civilization. The purpose of the church was to prevent the restoration of roman (european) aristocracy. Some monks in the north, particularly ireland, worked to save what little knowledge remained in europe. Some middle easterners saved the work of some of the greeks and romans. Then destroyed the rest with the muslim conquest.
The problem was that the church was far more corrupt than the state it sought to replace. So after the institution of the church we had the monastic movement to defend the people from the church, then the protestant reformation to defend people from the church. The renaissance reformation and scientific revolution to escape the corruption of the church.
Jesus was a gift from god. He was the only christian. American Evangelical Protestantism the closest religion to the one Jesus imagined, and the church as a political institution the farthest thing from the one he would have imagined. So the church failed in the early medieval period. It failed in the igh medieval period. It was punished in the restoration of european civilzation. And in the 19th Century it failed again in response to discoveries of science. And it has been destroyed by the marxist-postmodernist-feminist revolution against both christianity and aristocracy. And it wasn’t until the middle of the 20th that protestant evangelicals finally cast off the corruption of the church, and returned christianity to a religion of the people, by the people, in imitation of jesus christ. I have seen evangelical preachers take christianity even closer to its roots by teaching christianity as an intuitive more emotional close relation to our ancient religion of stoicism, and our scientific understanding of cognitive behavioral therapy.
My view of christianity is an attempt to use jesus teachings to create an institution of governance and oppression, where jesus was trying to lift poor ignorant people out of tribalism, so that they were not a permanent underclass taken advantage of by usurers and tyrants, by loving each other as the greatest resistance movement against tyranny whether familial, tribal, national, or imperial in human history.
So I am personally hostile to ‘Church-ianity” but I consider myself a christian who seeks to follow the teachings of jesus christ: “Love thy neighbor”.
I am not sure anything else is required. There are five principles buried in christian teaching. Every one of them is reducible to “love thy neighbor and thy conscience shall be free.” That’s it.
(core)
[W]hy is western civilization successfully undermined by the marxist, postmodernist, feminist, politically correct, science-denialist ant-western, anti-christian, anti-white, anti-male sequence of movements?
Who created those movements? Why are europeans vulnerable to it, but why are Indians and east asians not vulnerable to it? Why is europe’s traditional system of development by incremental suppression of falsehood, free riding, and underclass reproduction, culminating in Darwin and the american eugenics movement so antithetical to the left? Why did the left invent a hierarchy of pseudosciences and lies to deny western civilization and the darwinian explanation for it? Why is the left’s strategy disapproval of truth, undermining through gossiping rallying shaming, moralizing, psychologizing, shrilling, outraging, and reputation destruction? Why is the truth so dangerous? And why has the thought leadership of each of these movements been Jewish? And why don’t Jews, like europeans, stop their own from undermining by creating distributing and reinforcing falsehoods? What do Boas, Freud, Marx, Adorno-Fromm, Derrida-Lyotard, Friedan all share in common? And why do they so successfully produce falsehoods: pseudoscience, sophism, denial, and deceit?
Answer: groups evolve strategies, and genes adapt relatively rapidly to those strategies, and myths, traditions, and methods warfare and methods of argument replicate, reinforce, and express that strategy: in other words, we don’t know what we’re doing.
So, incrementally suppress the female means of undermining and as we have incrementally suppressed all other forms of criminal activity as it has been invented, applied, and discovered. It is possible to construct the law so that the left’s means of undermining lying are illegal – and it turns out to be relatively easy.
The only problem is that christianity, judaism, and islam are propagated by the same false means, which is why marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and denialism were produced by the same group strategy as the abrahamic religions.
Why aren’t members of the group that claim innocence stopping the members of their group from destroying the host civilization?
EUROPEAN CIVILIZATION’S EUGENIC, DARWINIAN, STRATEGY
The European peoples have been able to evolve genetically, culturally, economically, technologically and scientifically faster than all other peoples in the ancient and modern worlds because of our traditions of:
… self determination, sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, excellence, heroism, rule of law and jury, and markets in all aspects of life;
WHERE
… the market for suppression of parasitism we call the law, and the market for reciprocity in the production of goods, services, and information, evolve as rapidly as possible,
THEREBY
… advancing productive innovations in each other’s interests, and suppression innovations in parasitism against others interests, in exchange for softly suppresses the rates of reproduction of the underclasses,
THEREBY
… allowing us to divert proceeds from our production to the commons, and the higher returns for all from those commons, the most important of which are truth before face, trust, artistic, scientific, technological, economic adaptive and and innovative velocity, and the prosperity, joy, and peace of mind that results from it.
THEREFORE
Western civilization is not the first, but it is the fastest, in the prehistoric, ancient, and modern worlds, sovereignty expands human ability most rapidly for the simple reason that market rule, limited by natural law. creates both the most incentive to innovate and change, and the least resistance to innovation and change, that are possible at any given moment.
THE RESTORATION OF EUROPEAN CIVILIZATION AND THE RESISTANCE MOVEMENTS
I – The restoration of Aristotle, the restoration of writing, and the Re-separation of Germanic from Latin Civilization.
… 1. 1100-1300- The turn of islam to fundamentalism, the flight of islamic scholars, the return of Aristotle by muslim scholars, their translation into latin,
… 2. The European Re-Conquest of spain.
… 3. The Evolution of the Hansa and the completion under the Holy Roman Empire of the Rule of Law project, contractualism, individual sovereignty, mobile labor, capital concentration, the corporation.
… 3. The Ottoman conquest of Byzantium, fall of Constantinople, the muslim blockade, the search for alternate trade routes, the age of sail, the age of muslim piracy, the age of exploration, the age of colonization.
II – The First British Scientific Revolution 1600’s+
… 1. Newton 1660, Locke, Smith, Hume.
… 2. The defeat of the ottomans, and the final constraint of islam after a thousand years of raids, slaving, piracy, conquest and subjugation.
III – The Continental Secular Theological Counter-Revolution
… 1. The French Counter-Revolution Rousseau (1700’s)
… 2. The German Counter-Revolution Kant et al (1800’s)
IV – The Second Anglo-German Scientific Revolution 1830+
(Menger, Darwin, Spencer, Maxwell, Hilbert…)
The Jewish Pseudoscientific Counter- Revolution 1850 … The anglo enfranchisement of the jews … (a) The Marxist and Jewish undermining of the HRE. … (a) The Bolshevik overthrow of Russian civilization … (b) The Communist Undermining of Germanic civilization … (c) The Communist seizure of power in France. … (d) The Communist, marxist, postmodernist, invasion and undermining of America.
V – The Anglo American Technological Revolution
(Turing, Edison-N, Telecom, Radio, Transistors, Computers,)
1930+
… (a) (Ongoing.)
THE CENTURY OF THE JEWISH COUNTER-REVOLUTION AGAINST DARWIN AND DARWINIAN CIVILIZATION
Marxism(1850+): To cast jewish condition as a universal condition. To undermine cooperation between the classes. To undermine white ascent into capital concentration.
Freudianism(90′-20’s): To undermine Darwin and Instincts
Boasianism(10-20’s): To undermine Darwin and integration
Cantor and Bohr: To undermine mathematical realism.
Neo-Marxism(50’s+): To undermine Darwinian Cultural Homogeneity. (Max Horkheimer, Theodor W. Adorno, Erich Fromm, and Herbert Marcuse, Antonio Gramsci)
Feminism(60’s+): To undermine Darwin and the Family.
Postmodernism(70’s+): To undermine Darwin,Truth, Science, Reason.
HBD-Denialism(80’s+): To blatantly deny Darwin and Evolution
Identitarianism(90’s+): To undermine the Darwinian White Peoples
THE GROUP STRATEGY OF THE LEFT: DEFEAT DARWIN TO FACILITATE SEPARATISM.
The entire ideology of the left is to resist integration, to preserve their parasitic group strategy, to preserve their female means of undermining, to deny the Darwinian revolution and the necessity of paternal, hierarchical, market meritocratic consumption and reproduction.
All political conflict is reducible to this question
The right practices markets in everything: darwinian evolution.
The ideological left denies evolutionary pressure exists.
The theological right only debates its cause.
This is why the right is ‘right’ even if for the wrong reason.
LEFT: Maternal, equalitarian, dysgenic devolutionary
-vs-
RIGHT: Paternal, meritocratic, eugenic evolutionary.
Revolt. Separate. Continue to Speciate.
or
Return to our ancestral means of conquest, rule, and darwinian domestication of man by markets.THE PURSUIT OF NON-FALSE RELIGION
P-Law is compatible with religion.
It’s that (a) Abrahamic religion is incompatible with testimonial truth; (b) testimonial truth is necessary to suppress de-civilization, destruction, and conquest by islam, judaism, and jewish marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and evolutionary science denialism – the purpose of which is to prevent continued transcendence of many into gods with european understanding of the language and words of the gods: math, science, the laws of nature, and the natural law of man; (c) nature thanks, ancestor thanks, civilizational-hero thanks, archetype thanks, the stoic method of virtue and mindfulness, and the epicurean philosophy, invented by europeans, constitute the only non-false religion we know of other than east asian ancestor worship, buddhist mindfulness, confucian wisdom, and ethnocentrism: self-love.
We cannot produce a body of law free of falsehood, and that restores unification of church and state, with a religion compatible with the physical, natural, and transcendent laws, that closes the door to another body of undermining with the Abrahamic, female method of destruction of civilization by false promise of unwarrantable freedom from laws of nature, natural law of man, and necessity of evolutionary transcendence of man, baiting into hazard, creating conflict between the elites, classes, genders, and generations, destroying the informational, institutional, civil, familial, commons upon which our high trust civilization depends – and profiting from the managed decline.
The only difficulty in this process is that christians resist the final reformation of their religion out of abrahamic deceit and into the imitation of Jesus – the invention of the feminine god of those who suffer – compatible with european civilization’s masculine gods, regardless of their names: Washington, Caesar, Jupiter, Dius, Zeus, Ziu, Tyr, Tiwaz, Dayus Pitar “sky father”; Alexander, Mercury, Thor; And the rest – “the gods of those who joy”.
(core)
[W]hy is western civilization successfully undermined by the marxist, postmodernist, feminist, politically correct, science-denialist ant-western, anti-christian, anti-white, anti-male sequence of movements?
Who created those movements? Why are europeans vulnerable to it, but why are Indians and east asians not vulnerable to it? Why is europe’s traditional system of development by incremental suppression of falsehood, free riding, and underclass reproduction, culminating in Darwin and the american eugenics movement so antithetical to the left? Why did the left invent a hierarchy of pseudosciences and lies to deny western civilization and the darwinian explanation for it? Why is the left’s strategy disapproval of truth, undermining through gossiping rallying shaming, moralizing, psychologizing, shrilling, outraging, and reputation destruction? Why is the truth so dangerous? And why has the thought leadership of each of these movements been Jewish? And why don’t Jews, like europeans, stop their own from undermining by creating distributing and reinforcing falsehoods? What do Boas, Freud, Marx, Adorno-Fromm, Derrida-Lyotard, Friedan all share in common? And why do they so successfully produce falsehoods: pseudoscience, sophism, denial, and deceit?
Answer: groups evolve strategies, and genes adapt relatively rapidly to those strategies, and myths, traditions, and methods warfare and methods of argument replicate, reinforce, and express that strategy: in other words, we don’t know what we’re doing.
So, incrementally suppress the female means of undermining and as we have incrementally suppressed all other forms of criminal activity as it has been invented, applied, and discovered. It is possible to construct the law so that the left’s means of undermining lying are illegal – and it turns out to be relatively easy.
The only problem is that christianity, judaism, and islam are propagated by the same false means, which is why marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and denialism were produced by the same group strategy as the abrahamic religions.
Why aren’t members of the group that claim innocence stopping the members of their group from destroying the host civilization?
EUROPEAN CIVILIZATION’S EUGENIC, DARWINIAN, STRATEGY
The European peoples have been able to evolve genetically, culturally, economically, technologically and scientifically faster than all other peoples in the ancient and modern worlds because of our traditions of:
… self determination, sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, excellence, heroism, rule of law and jury, and markets in all aspects of life;
WHERE
… the market for suppression of parasitism we call the law, and the market for reciprocity in the production of goods, services, and information, evolve as rapidly as possible,
THEREBY
… advancing productive innovations in each other’s interests, and suppression innovations in parasitism against others interests, in exchange for softly suppresses the rates of reproduction of the underclasses,
THEREBY
… allowing us to divert proceeds from our production to the commons, and the higher returns for all from those commons, the most important of which are truth before face, trust, artistic, scientific, technological, economic adaptive and and innovative velocity, and the prosperity, joy, and peace of mind that results from it.
THEREFORE
Western civilization is not the first, but it is the fastest, in the prehistoric, ancient, and modern worlds, sovereignty expands human ability most rapidly for the simple reason that market rule, limited by natural law. creates both the most incentive to innovate and change, and the least resistance to innovation and change, that are possible at any given moment.
THE RESTORATION OF EUROPEAN CIVILIZATION AND THE RESISTANCE MOVEMENTS
I – The restoration of Aristotle, the restoration of writing, and the Re-separation of Germanic from Latin Civilization.
… 1. 1100-1300- The turn of islam to fundamentalism, the flight of islamic scholars, the return of Aristotle by muslim scholars, their translation into latin,
… 2. The European Re-Conquest of spain.
… 3. The Evolution of the Hansa and the completion under the Holy Roman Empire of the Rule of Law project, contractualism, individual sovereignty, mobile labor, capital concentration, the corporation.
… 3. The Ottoman conquest of Byzantium, fall of Constantinople, the muslim blockade, the search for alternate trade routes, the age of sail, the age of muslim piracy, the age of exploration, the age of colonization.
II – The First British Scientific Revolution 1600’s+
… 1. Newton 1660, Locke, Smith, Hume.
… 2. The defeat of the ottomans, and the final constraint of islam after a thousand years of raids, slaving, piracy, conquest and subjugation.
III – The Continental Secular Theological Counter-Revolution
… 1. The French Counter-Revolution Rousseau (1700’s)
… 2. The German Counter-Revolution Kant et al (1800’s)
IV – The Second Anglo-German Scientific Revolution 1830+
(Menger, Darwin, Spencer, Maxwell, Hilbert…)
The Jewish Pseudoscientific Counter- Revolution 1850 … The anglo enfranchisement of the jews … (a) The Marxist and Jewish undermining of the HRE. … (a) The Bolshevik overthrow of Russian civilization … (b) The Communist Undermining of Germanic civilization … (c) The Communist seizure of power in France. … (d) The Communist, marxist, postmodernist, invasion and undermining of America.
V – The Anglo American Technological Revolution
(Turing, Edison-N, Telecom, Radio, Transistors, Computers,)
1930+
… (a) (Ongoing.)
THE CENTURY OF THE JEWISH COUNTER-REVOLUTION AGAINST DARWIN AND DARWINIAN CIVILIZATION
Marxism(1850+): To cast jewish condition as a universal condition. To undermine cooperation between the classes. To undermine white ascent into capital concentration.
Freudianism(90′-20’s): To undermine Darwin and Instincts
Boasianism(10-20’s): To undermine Darwin and integration
Cantor and Bohr: To undermine mathematical realism.
Neo-Marxism(50’s+): To undermine Darwinian Cultural Homogeneity. (Max Horkheimer, Theodor W. Adorno, Erich Fromm, and Herbert Marcuse, Antonio Gramsci)
Feminism(60’s+): To undermine Darwin and the Family.
Postmodernism(70’s+): To undermine Darwin,Truth, Science, Reason.
HBD-Denialism(80’s+): To blatantly deny Darwin and Evolution
Identitarianism(90’s+): To undermine the Darwinian White Peoples
THE GROUP STRATEGY OF THE LEFT: DEFEAT DARWIN TO FACILITATE SEPARATISM.
The entire ideology of the left is to resist integration, to preserve their parasitic group strategy, to preserve their female means of undermining, to deny the Darwinian revolution and the necessity of paternal, hierarchical, market meritocratic consumption and reproduction.
All political conflict is reducible to this question
The right practices markets in everything: darwinian evolution.
The ideological left denies evolutionary pressure exists.
The theological right only debates its cause.
This is why the right is ‘right’ even if for the wrong reason.
LEFT: Maternal, equalitarian, dysgenic devolutionary
-vs-
RIGHT: Paternal, meritocratic, eugenic evolutionary.
Revolt. Separate. Continue to Speciate.
or
Return to our ancestral means of conquest, rule, and darwinian domestication of man by markets.THE PURSUIT OF NON-FALSE RELIGION
P-Law is compatible with religion.
It’s that (a) Abrahamic religion is incompatible with testimonial truth; (b) testimonial truth is necessary to suppress de-civilization, destruction, and conquest by islam, judaism, and jewish marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and evolutionary science denialism – the purpose of which is to prevent continued transcendence of many into gods with european understanding of the language and words of the gods: math, science, the laws of nature, and the natural law of man; (c) nature thanks, ancestor thanks, civilizational-hero thanks, archetype thanks, the stoic method of virtue and mindfulness, and the epicurean philosophy, invented by europeans, constitute the only non-false religion we know of other than east asian ancestor worship, buddhist mindfulness, confucian wisdom, and ethnocentrism: self-love.
We cannot produce a body of law free of falsehood, and that restores unification of church and state, with a religion compatible with the physical, natural, and transcendent laws, that closes the door to another body of undermining with the Abrahamic, female method of destruction of civilization by false promise of unwarrantable freedom from laws of nature, natural law of man, and necessity of evolutionary transcendence of man, baiting into hazard, creating conflict between the elites, classes, genders, and generations, destroying the informational, institutional, civil, familial, commons upon which our high trust civilization depends – and profiting from the managed decline.
The only difficulty in this process is that christians resist the final reformation of their religion out of abrahamic deceit and into the imitation of Jesus – the invention of the feminine god of those who suffer – compatible with european civilization’s masculine gods, regardless of their names: Washington, Caesar, Jupiter, Dius, Zeus, Ziu, Tyr, Tiwaz, Dayus Pitar “sky father”; Alexander, Mercury, Thor; And the rest – “the gods of those who joy”.
—“I’ve been following John Mark for some time now and generally agree with your observations on politics, the media and the way our country is headed and what conservatives need to do about it. However I find you venturing into religious commentary analysis disconcerting especially when it is viewed more as a way of controlling the masses and devoid of any spiritual truth or meaning. This reminds a great deal of the way Karl Marx viewed religion bad “an opiate for the masses.” It worried me also in that you are ignoring the fact this country which you want to save was founded in Christianity, put “In God We Trust” on our money and whose great founders and leaders prayed often and diligently for guidance and wisdom for the course of our country. If you try to turn our country around without a true belief in God you will have not saved this country but perhaps create a different sort of democracy devoid of God and all the foundations that have made this the greatest nation in the world and it will fail miserably. I would hope you will stay out of the theology business that most of the true Patriots of this country believe in and stick to the more obvious analysis of politics and trends in general. Otherwise you can count me and perhaps many others out of your “Winning Right.”—Joel Rhodes
Going to answer two points you’ve made:
1) —“I find you venturing into religious commentary analysis disconcerting especially when it is viewed more as a way of controlling the masses and devoid of any spiritual truth or meaning.”—
My objective is to end the undermining of western civilization by the use of the abrahamic method of deceit, upon which were built the first system of anti-religious-market lies of judaism, christianity, and islam, and the second anti-political-market lies: marxism, postmodernism, feminism – and the continued durability of judaism, christianity, and islam as monopolistic totalitarian religions. So I struggle with reforming christianity so that the teachings of Jesus are retained, but the abrahamic method of deceit by which christianity is justified is removed. At present we must make excuses in the constitution for the preservation of a single method of lying using the abrahamic method of deceit to preserve the good in christianity and the tolerance of the christian center.
In other words, the only problem we face today is that christians use the jewish means of lying to justify christian religion, instead of reforming the church so that it is – as we see in some protestant churches – a continuous lesson in psychology(mindfulness) – where jesus’ teaching is the most primitive and effective method of using group therapy to program individuals into mindfuless. the stoic method is not as effective for common people because it is requires intellectual exercise. So it is of its nature a middle and upper class means of mindfuless. Yet evidence says that we can like our ancestors or japan combine multiple traditions to achieve our ends. And that is part of my work
To produce a social order free of the abrahamic method of deceit, so that we are no longer vulnerable to the abrahamic method of deceit.
2) —“you are ignoring the fact this country which you want to save was founded in Christianity”—
This country was founded by men who were members of the enlightenment, for who god varied – just as today – between (a) a euphemism for the laws of the universe and god the anthropomorphic character we attribute to it, (b) the uninvolved abstract god of deism while maintains that there may be some abstract force we anthropomorphize as god, (c) jesus as a philosopher of speaking in religious prose under one of those gods, (d) jesus as a prophet, and god as existential. (e) full dogmatic fundamentalists who believe everything is determined by god and the bible is the literal word of god. And that, just as I go to church recite words, and just as Jefferson did, that does not mean that those of us who are secular and philosophical are merely performing a ritual for the benefit of all of us across that spectrum, and whose of us who are theological are doing it for the god and prophet for which we hope to benefit ourselves and the polity.
So, I’ll give you the opposing theory: that for aristocracy, christianity was an excuse for Aryanism (superiority), and religion is a means of controlling the vast ignorant underclasses. For the priesthood that came from the nobility or middle classes it was a means of earning income from administering a vast illiterate ignorant underclass by false promise and pacifying them. And that by and large – just as postmodernism is practiced by the academy and urbanites and traditionalism by the rurals, through almost all of the dark ages, the church was as corrupt as we know perceive our state, only the city dwellers gave it lip service, and the people were christian only at church, and the rest of the time maintained their traditional germanic paganism.
So if you mean ‘the people were ignorant and illiterate farmers and laborers who were administered into christian pacifism and tolerance for one another, and that the aristocracy was always practiced war and law and property just as those of us today with agency and recourses practice property, economic warfare, political warfare, and organize the laboring classes to conduct war” then yes. But do not for a moment confuse the fact that in western civilization, we practice Tripartism intellectually and trifunctionalism institutionally, and that the military, judicial, and theological priesthoods were all present at all times, and we allied with the most important to us at any given moment – just like today.
The warning I am giving you is one that only a few thinkers give in each era, with sun tzu and machiavelli the most well known. That is: (a) do not confuse that your primary framework for understanding the organization of western civilization isn’t just a class framework (b) that all three frameworks are always and everywhere present, (c) that what binds them together isn’t any one of the three, but sovereignty, and the three possible methods of coercion force trifunctionalism, which forces tripartism. We are all european if and only if we are the people of who use markets in everything – and this is why the church failed here and only succeeded in the (underclass) middle east – almost everyone was at the bottom, and so religion brought them there. In the west we have classes and we move between them as needed.
I separate the catholic church as a political organization, from belief in the supernatural and occult, from christianity as a system of alien myths and dogmas, from imitating person jesus regardless of the primitivism of words attributed to him, from the general need for simple people to escape the continuous judgement of self and others in a world where doing so by some standard other than selfishness is non rational.
What we call ‘christian’ is a semitic political religious dogma taught by a greek bureaucracy over an aryan social religious relationship between peoples and the world.
One is a member of the christian system of behaviors because he behaves more like other christians than he does members of every other rious order – not because what he thinks or believes. Otherwise all of christianity is false.
These are empirical statements – not justificationary statements.
Either you act in practice under the accumulated behaviors of our aryan, roman, greek, and semitic systems of thought, or you don’t. The degree with which you fantasize about it is merely a statement of your demand to insulate yourself from counter signaling by others.
Which is the reason for religion: counter-signaling our alienation with some form of mindfulness as our relative value to the polity decreases with political scale.
This is merely true.
God and the universe are one and the same. Jesus told us one set of rules that make us more compatible with the universe, and therefore god. These rules are the optimum ingroup social order. There is none other.
1) the eradication of hatred from the human heart.
2) the extension of kinship love to non-kin.
3) the demand for personal acts of charity and personal cost,
4) the extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war.
If you practice these rules then you are acting in concert with the universe and god such that no other set of practices will produce a superior end for you or others.
That’s just the science of it all.
I don’t need woo woo. I am not afraid of my station in relation to others. I do not fear my betters – I welcome them.
The laws of the universe are the origin of truth about that universe. The natural law of human cooperation consists of reciprocity and the teachings of jesus.
Neither set of rules is complicated.
They are just so simple that they leave us no means of deceit by which to lie to ourselves or others.
THE SCIENCE OF CHRISTIANITY
—-“What is the overall message of the bible?”—
(“Salvation”)
It is:
“If you submit (abandon) your reason, and surrender (abandon) your will to the commands of an evil omnipotent and omniscient fictional character, and imitate the life of another very benevolent and charitable fictional character, that you will find salvation (be saved) in a non existent afterlife, after you die.”
Scientifically:
Now scientifically speaking, christianity is reducible to:
1) the eradication of hatred from the human heart.
2) the extension of kinship love to non-kin.
3) the extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, imprisonment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war.
And this turns out to be the optimum strategy for producing persistent high trust cooperation. It’s just counter intuitive since we evolved very aggressive altruistic punishment.
And functionally:
More than 1/3 if not 1/2 of people are lack the agency both internal and environmental, and or the intelligence, and or the resources to contrive a means of successfully competing in market civilization, when ones self worth and status are determined by by that success.
As such providing an alternative method by which people of limited agency, ability, and resources can develop virtuous behavior, and personal mindfulness, and therefore happiness with their self image, through merely extension of kinship love, forgiveness, and charity is a successful strategy. Moreover, the externalities produced in a market civilization by large numbers of these people constructs the trust necessary for prosperity in a market civilization.
And Politically:
Despite lacking agency, ability, knowledge, education, and resources, people are able to use ‘faith’ and the ‘christian strategy’ to defend against threats to their strategy, their self image, and the good they do to society, are impervious to corruption, to persuasion, to coercion, and to abandonment of that strategy (hence why intelligence agencies love to hire christians).
The problem is that there is an ever declining percentage of the population willing to use this strategy by faith, even if there is an ever expanding population willing to use this strategy if stated as scientifically as I have here.
So while a demand for ‘church’ remains, a demand for the primitivism of semitic underclasses, has been replaced by a demand for the advance reason of european middle classes.
The already devoted are irrelevant. It’s those who are not open to devotion that don’t need a religion of faith, but a religion of reason, that need mindfulness.
THE REQUIREMENTS FOR CHRISTIAN IDENTITY
All that is required to claim one is a Christian is to have adopted the teachings of Christianity:
The eradication of hatred from the human heart.
The extension of kinship love to non-kin.
The extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war.
The commitment to personal acts of charity for those who are in need.
The respect of private property – in thought and in deed, because property creates harmony and prosperity – the natural law.
That this is the optimum ingroup evolutionary strategy is simply a matter of logic and evidence. It’s not ‘good’ for arbitrary reasons, but for scientific and logical reasons.
There is nothing in this list that was not in europe except equalitarianism. Europeans have always been Tripartite, and this list doesn’t include tripartism. So by substituting the tripartism of class responsibility for the fallacy of equality, we find sufficiency for norm and law, but insufficiency for economy and polity.
THE REQUIREMENTS FOR CHRISTIAN EUROPEAN IDENTITY
All that is required to claim one is a Christian is to have adopted the teachings of Christianity:
THE UNIVERSAL IDENTITY: THE VIA-NEGATIVA
1. Do not covet (envy)
2. Do not lie, cheat, gossip, or conspire.
3. Do not rape, adulter, or prostitute.
4. Do not murder, steal, or harm.
THE CHRISTIAN IDENTITY: THE VIA-POSITIVA
1. The eradication of hatred from the human heart.
2. The extension of kinship love to non-kin.
3. The extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war.
4. The commitment to personal acts of charity for those who are in need.
THE ARYAN EUROPEAN IDENTITY
1. Demand and Do: Sovereignty and Reciprocity,
2. Demand and Do: Truth and Duty
3. Demand and Do: The Law and Markets
4. Demand and Do: Insure the Good, Punish the Wicked.
THE HEATHEN EUROPEAN IDENTITY
1. The laws of nature are binding on all of existence; and;
2. Nature is sacred and to be contemplated, protected and improved; and;
3. To leave the universe changed for the better – a Garden – for having lived in it.
4. To die a good death in the service of my people.
THE TRANSCENDENCE OF MAN INTO GODS.
Through the continuous competition between trial and error, as we calculate perfection one thought, word, and deed at a time.
That this is the optimum ingroup evolutionary strategy is simply a matter of logic and evidence.
RELIGIOUS (INTUITION) TRAINING
Time, Institution, Ritual, and Tradition, depersonalize training (education) of the intuitions, such that the resistance we have to being taught by those who we may not know, not understand, disdain, dislike, fear, is circumvented. As such the teachers can be demanding, use false promise, intimidation, and fear to teach to those who are not kin.
Repeating oaths does its work.
Repeating parables does its work.
Creating perception of debts does its work.
Creating ostracization and inclusion with those oaths, parables, in continuous payment of those debts does its work.
The question is this:
What OATHS are True, and Good?
What PARABLES teach the True and the Good?
What DEBTS produce the True, and Good?
What PROMISES of Inclusion, and THREATS of Ostracization produce the True and the Good?
What FEASTS and FESTIVALS teach reward for all that do so?
We can disassemble our religion into Oaths, Parables, Debts, Promises and Threats, Feast and Festivals, and in doing so construct a legal system – because that is what it consists of: a law of intuition – and then replace the false and bad with the true and good.
We can replace submission with pacifism with domestication, submission with non-submission, lack of agency with agency, oath a lie, with oath to our people, transcendence into a lie, with transcendence into the gods we imagine, eternal life in a lie with eternal persistence and recurrence among our people, and Marxism, Postmodernism, Feminism, and the Hatred of White Men with Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, Natural Law, Voluntary Markets, and Transcendence, with The Love of Our People both male and female.
No More Lies.
We Europeanized Christianity from a resistance movement to an excuse for aryanism. And by the twentieth century were shaking off the remains and restoring our aryanism.
Underneath christian falsehood is merely this:
EXCELLENCE (Virtue): I proudly display my excellences so that others seek to achieve or exceed them; I seek competition to constantly test and improve myself so I do not weaken;
SOVEREIGNTY; I grant sovereignty to my kin and demand it;
TRUTH: I swear to speak no insult and demand it; I speak the truth and demand it; I take nothing not paid for and demand it; Cause no harm without restitution for it;
DUTY: I insure my people regardless of condition, and demand it; and in doing so leave nothing but voluntary markets of cooperation between sovereign men; and to discipline, enserf, enslave, ostracize or kill those who do otherwise;
COURAGE: I shall not show fear or cowardice, abandon my brothers, or retreat, and I shall seek to die a good death in the service of my kin, my clan, my tribe and my people.
LOVE: The eradication of hatred from the human heart;The extension of kinship love to non-kin. The extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war; and the commitment to personal acts of charity for those who are in need.
NATURE: I accept the laws of nature as binding on all of existence; and; I treat nature as sacred and to be contemplated, protected and improved; and; I treat the world as something to transform closer to an Eden in whatever ways I can before I die; and
SUPREMACY OF MAN: I deny the existence of a supreme being with dominion over the physical laws, and treat all gods, demigods, heroes, saints, figures of history, and ancestors as characters with whom I may speak to in private contemplation in the hope of gaining wisdom and synchronicity from having done so.
NO MORE LIES.
WESTERN MAN: SOVEREIGNTY: THE CULT OF NON-SUBMISSION: THE RELIGION OF WHOSE WHO SHALL BE GODS.
RELIGION: NO MORE LIES
Here is another lie:
LIE:
–”
The greatest artists were Christian.
The greatest architects were Christian.
The greatest composers were Christian.
The greatest explorers were Christian.
The greatest philosophers were Christian.
We are no longer Christian.
Is it really any wonder why our culture is in such a dire state?
“– Earl of Grey
INSTEAD:
–”
The greatest artists were atheist
The greatest architects were polytheist
The greatest composers were Christian.
The greatest explorers were polytheist
The greatest philosophers were polytheist
u dont know shit Earl of ((( )))
“— Flo Facchi
They were european, aryan, heathen when they produced socrates, plato, and aristotle, when they produced alexander, caesar, and the great roman peace.
They were christian when they produced few arts, few letters, and few explorers.
They were restored to aristotle ~1200ad and they produced the great law, the great arts, the great letters, the great architecture, the great explorers, and finally the great SCIENTISTS (aristotelians).
Christianity is a semitic disease we survived. our natural religion is the militia, the law, the heart, our ancestors, the construction of commons, and truth before face.
There is nothing good in christianity that was not there before it. And everything bad in christianity was not there before semitic lying by false promise, pilpul and critique were introduced to our people by those who invented the lie, and for whom lie is more useful than face, or truth: they who subjugate by lies.
We germanized christianity. And under germanic thought we have nearly three times escaped the semitic lies. But the underclasses and women and priests always hold back our people from the cure. And because of those women and underclasses and priests and their folly we are conquered by our ancient enemy: the people who lie: the middle east.
NO MORE LIES
Christianity is reducible to this and nothing more:
1) The habituation that life, nature, and the natural order are to be preserved from our impulses (that’s what ‘sacred’ means).
2) the eradication of hatred from the human heart.
3) the extension of kinship love to non-kin.
4) the demand for personal acts of charity and personal cost,
5) the extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war.
That differentiates christianity from any other religion only slightly.
What differentiates the west from the west is not our religion, but our law: sovereignty and reciprocity, heroism and beauty, truth and duty, law and markets (competition) in all walks of life.
We have always been a tripartite(3-4part) people: truth and law and power for the aristocracy, sovereignty, reciprocity and contract and markets for the middle class. Freedom, safety, and duty for the laboring classes, and administration, education, lies, fraud, and rent seeking by the priestly classes.
Those who fight(aristocracy), those who pray (nobility/administer), those who trade (burghers), those who labor (craftsmen and laborers).
NO MORE LIES. WE ESCAPED CHRISTIANITY.
Do we need a religion? Yes.
…(an heroic narrative for our people)
Do we need temples? Yes.
…(We need rituals to empathize with (‘commune with’) those great actors of history who were of archetypal example to us.)
An oath? Yes.
…(To the universe, nature, our heroes, ancestors, ourselves, our people, and all of our people yet to come)
Rituals, feasts, and holidays? Yes.
…(The elimination of our differences in status during ritual, feast and holiday)
Some form of training that provides mindfulness? Yes.
…(self authoring stoicism and associated practices)
Some form of training in manners, ethics, morals, calculations (rwa), and skills of a trade? Yes.
…( restoration of the church as the central means of education and restoration of financing to the church)
Limits to those who would work against the interests of our people? Yes.
…(the extension of Prohibition on falsehood and fraud from commerce to all walks of life: the commercial, financial, economic, legal, political, and pedagogical.)
WE NEED TO FINISH THE RESTORATION OF OUR PEOPLE WHILE KEEPING THE FIVE RULES OF CHRISTIANITY.
The five rules of christianity are the OPTIMUM in-group cooperative strategy producing the highest trust, most distributive, least predatory, most protective social order possible.
Because of those five rules, and imitating the Archetype we call ‘jesus’ when interacting with each other in good faith,
There are no gods but us. There are Archetypes we have made to help us understand how to act by imitation and role playing. There are supernormal heroes of history we have raised to archetypal status over centuries. There are heroes of history who we use as archetypes despite their humanity.
But as far as we know, at present, we are the only gods in this universe.
And the vast share of goodness created by man was created by the european, persian, indo-aryan, and east asian peoples, in a desperate attempt to drag the rest of humanity kicking and screaming out of superstition, ignorance, poverty, hard labor, suffering, disease, child mortality, early death, and the hostility of a nature uncaring for us.
The semitic peoples have destroyed every people they have touched like a cancer destroys every cell it has touched. If you examine the list of dead gods, which means ‘exterminated peoples’, they are, nearly all, dead by the semitic people, or western people under semitic superstitious influence.
We saved mankind in the ancient world, and we saved mankind in the modern world, – not because we were christian. But despite the fact that we were still sufficiently christian (meaning syrian, jewish).
NO MORE LIES.
Parables and lies are for children and the dim. Indoctrination into parables and lies for children causes infantilization of the mind. Hence our current generation that has been infantilized by the second wave of semitic ‘ideas’: marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and ‘denialism’.
NO MORE LIES
The “truth before all” is what made us great in both ancient and modern worlds.
The truth is enough to save us from the second semitic dark age of ignorance, and death of our people under the influence of semitic lies.
THE DEVIL WAS CUNNING:
—“Judaism to undermine, christianity weaken, islam to conquer and destroy.”–
This statement is the history of the past two thousand years.
(mandatory understanding on IE origins of Market Gods) (compare with the Monopoly of semitic underclass gods)
[T]he Trifunctional Hypothesis of prehistoric Proto-Indo-European society postulates a tripartite ideology (“idéologie tripartite”) reflected in the existence of three classes or castes—priests, warriors, and commoners (farmers or tradesmen)—corresponding to the three functions of the sacral, the martial and the economic, respectively.
The trifunctional thesis is primarily associated with the French mythographer Georges Dumézil, who proposed it in 1929 in the book Flamen-Brahman, and later in Mitra-Varuna.
According to Dumézil (1898–1986), Proto-Indo-European society comprised three main groups corresponding to three distinct functions:
Sovereignty, which fell into two distinct and complementary sub-parts: … 1.1 one formal, juridical and priestly but worldly; … 1.2 the other powerful, unpredictable, and also priestly but rooted in the supernatural world.
Military, connected with force, the military and war.
Productivity, herding, farming, and crafts; ruled by the other two.
In the Proto-Indo-European mythology, each social group had its own god or family of gods to represent it and the function of the god or gods matched the function of the group. Many such divisions occur in the history of Indo-European societies:
Southern Russia: Bernard Sergent associates the Indo-European language family with certain archaeological cultures in Southern Russia and reconstructs an Indo-European religion based upon the tripartite functions.
Early Germanic society: The supposed division between the king, nobility and regular freemen in early Germanic society.
Norse mythology: Odin (sovereignty), Týr (law and justice), the Vanir (fertility). Odin is assigned one of the core functions in the Indo-European pantheon as a representative of the first function (sovereignty) corresponding to the Hindu Varuṇa (fury and magic) as opposed to Týr, who corresponds to the Hindu Mitrá (law and justice); while the Vanir represent the third function (fertility). Odin has been also been interpreted as a death-god (“Psychopomp”: transporting us to the afterlife) and connected to cremations, and has also been associated with ecstatic practices.
Classic Greece: The three divisions of the ideal society as described by Socrates in Plato’s The Republic. Bernard Sergent examined the trifunctional hypothesis in Greek epic, lyric and dramatic poetry.
India: The three Hindu castes, the Brahmins or priests; the Kshatriya, the warriors and military; and the Vaishya, the agriculturalists, cattle rearers and traders. The Shudra, a fourth Indian caste, is a peasant or serf. A 2001 study found that the genetic affinity of Indians to Europeans is proportionate to caste rank, the upper castes being most similar to Europeans whereas lower castes are more like Asians. The researchers believe that the Indo-European speakers entered India from the Northwest, mixing with or displacing proto-Dravidian speakers, and may have established a caste system with themselves primarily in higher castes.
TRIPLE (TRIPARTITE) DEITIES
A triple deity (sometimes referred to as threefold, tripled, triplicate, tripartite, triune or triadic, or as a trinity) is three deities that are worshipped as one. Such deities are common throughout world mythology; the number three has a long history of mythical associations. Carl Jung considered the arrangement of deities into triplets an archetype in the history of religion.
In classical religious iconography or mythological art, three separate beings may represent either a triad who always appear as a group (Greek Moirai, Charites, Erinyes; Norse Norns; or the Irish Morrígan) or a single deity known from literary sources as having three aspects (Greek Hecate, Roman Diana).
THE INDO EUROPEAN ORIGINS OF TRIPARTISM, TRIFUNCTIONALISM, TRIPLE GODS, AND TERNARY LOGIC
Georges Dumézil’s trifunctional hypothesis proposed that ancient Indo-European society conceived itself as structured around three activities: worship, war, and toil. In later times, when slave labor became common, the three functions came to be seen as separate “classes”, represented each by its own god. Dumézil understood this mythology as reflecting and validating social structures in its content: such a tripartite class system is found in ancient Indian, Iranian, Greek and Celtic texts. In 1970, Dumézil proposed that some goddesses represented these three qualities as different aspects or epithets and identified examples in his interpretation of various deities including the Iranian Anāhitā, the Vedic Sarasvatī and the Roman Juno.
Vesna Petreska posits that myths including trinities of female mythical beings from Central and Eastern European cultures may be evidence for an Indo-European belief in trimutive female “spinners” of destiny. But according to the linguist M. L. West, various female deities and mythological figures in Europe show the influence of pre-Indo-European goddess-worship, and triple female fate divinities, typically “spinners” of destiny, are attested all over Europe and in Bronze Age Anatolia.
POST BRONZE AGE COLLAPSE CULTURES
Ancient Celtic cultures
The Matres or Matronae are usually represented as a group of three but sometimes with as many as 27 (3 × 3 × 3) inscriptions. They were associated with motherhood and fertility. Inscriptions to these deities have been found in Gaul, Spain, Italy, the Rhineland and Britain, as their worship was carried by Roman soldiery dating from the mid 1st century to the 3rd century AD.[24] Miranda Green observes that “triplism” reflects a way of “expressing the divine rather than presentation of specific god-types. Triads or triple beings are ubiquitous in the Welsh and Irish mythic imagery” (she gives examples including the Irish battle-furies, Macha, and Brigit). “The religious iconographic repertoire of Gaul and Britain during the Roman period includes a wide range of triple forms: the most common triadic depiction is that of the triple mother goddess” (she lists numerous examples).[25]
In the case of the Irish Brigid it can be ambiguous whether she is a single goddess or three sisters, all named Brigid.[26] The Morrígan also appears sometimes as one being, and at other times as three sisters,[27][28][29][30] as do the three Irish goddesses of sovereignty, Ériu, Fódla and Banba.[31]
Hinduism
In Hinduism, the supreme divinity Para Brahman can take the form of the Trimurti, in which the cosmic functions of creation, preservation, and destruction of the universe are performed by the three deities of Brahma (the creator), Vishnu (the preserver), and Shiva (the destroyer), who are at the same time three forms of the one Para Brahman.[32] The divine being Dattatreya is a representation of all three of these deities incarnated as a single being.[33]
Christianity (the trinity)
Christians profess “one God in three divine persons” (God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Ghost). This is not to be understood as a belief in (or worship of) three Gods, nor as a belief that there are three subjectively-perceived “aspects” in one God, both of which the Catholic Church condemns as heresy. The Catholic Church also rejects the notions that God is “composed” of its three persons and that “God” is a genus containing the three persons.
The Gnostic text Trimorphic Protennoia presents a threefold discourse of the three forms of Divine Thought: the Father, the Son, and the Mother (Sophia).
Many Christian saints, especially martyrs, are trios who share a feast day or other remembrance. (See Category:Saints trios.) Whether they are subject to actual veneration and prayed to for supernatural aid, or simply honored, varies by Christian denomination.
ESTATES OF THE REALM
A 13th-century French representation of the tripartite social order of the Middle Ages – Oratores (“those who pray”), Bellatores (“those who fight”), and Laboratores (“those who work”).
The estates of the realm, or three estates, were the broad orders of social hierarchy used in Christendom (Christian Europe) from the medieval period to early modern Europe. Different systems for dividing society members into estates developed and evolved over time.
The best-known system is the French Ancien Régime (Old Regime), a three-estate system used until the French Revolution (1789–1799). Monarchy was for the king and the queen and this system was made up of clergy (the First Estate), nobles (the Second Estate), and peasants and bourgeoisie (the Third Estate). In some regions, notably Scandinavia and Russia, burghers (the urban merchant class) and rural commoners were split into separate estates, creating a four-estate system with rural commoners ranking the lowest as the Fourth Estate. Furthermore, the non-landowning poor could be left outside the estates, leaving them without political rights. In England, a two-estate system evolved that combined nobility and clergy into one lordly estate with “commons” as the second estate. This system produced the two houses of parliament, the House of Commons and the House of Lords. In southern Germany, a three-estate system of nobility (princes and high clergy), knights, and burghers was used. In Scotland, the Three Estates were the Clergy (First Estate), Nobility (Second Estate), and Shire Commissioners, or “burghers” (Third Estate), representing the bourgeois, middle class, and lower class. The Estates made up a Scottish Parliament.
TRIPARTISM (COOPERATIONISM, MARKETS) IN PROPERTARIANISM
In P we begin with the three means of coercion: Force-Defense, Remuneration-Deprivation, and Inclusion-Undermining (ostracization) in a market preserved by the judiciary. We argue that the three classes developed three ‘market competitions’ for elites; martial-judicial, priestly-educational, and productive-labor and trade. These three sets of elites we recognize as Conservative-Capitalizing (force), Progressive-consuming(Undermining), and Libertarian-Productive (Trade).
In P we restore the “cooperation between the compatible but unequal classes”: The Monarchy as judge of last resort, The Judiciary as preservation of sovereignty, the Senate (nobility) as territorial (tribal) interests, the Upper House as the Commercial Interests, and the Lower House as Family and Labor Interests.
Under this interpretation, Christianity is migrating to its natural place as the feminine (forgiveness, love), while we are restoring our traditional gods as we try to restore our civilization after the Abrahamic dark ages of death and decline.
LEARN MORE
This info is collected from Wikipedia but read Dumezil or at least the spark notes version. 😉 If you understand Dumizel’s description of, Campbell’s Monomyth, and the nordic myths you can begin to reconstruct our natural religions in both northern second generation and southern European first-generation forms.
