THE EVOLUTION OF COOPERATION IS JUST PHYSICS WITH MEMORY OF DEBTS – AND CONSEQUENCES FOR PRESENT AND FUTURE CRISES
The left does not cognitively grasp argumentation because they cannot cognitively distinguish between desirability vs undesirability and truth vs alsehood, where truth (Decidability) refers to independence from opinion, desirability, preference (Choice).
This inversion of truth and desirability is the instinctual female cognitive weighting of value. This instinct evolved to incentivize males(Asset Obtainers and Controllers) to satisfy female wants and needs (Asset Consumers and Reproducers).
In fact, it’s more helpful to treat the left as pubescent females lacking offspring to absorb the expansion of their empathy and misapplying that evolutionary instinct evolved to satisfy caloric demands on their immediate behalf to broader political contexts outside their locus of control and accountability.
Females do not demonstrate this hypersensitivity to stress until puberty when their nervous system is amplified to extend its awareness (sensitivity) to their offspring, just as the male nervous system is oppositely suppressed forcing the expansion of their political (worldly) sensitivity preparing them for political life among males. While we see male and female behavioral tendencies in healthy children from birth, maturity exacerbates these differences, away from the ‘self’ and into empathy in females and analysis in males. Our sense of becoming worldly is not artificial – our nervous systems are altered by nature specifically for this purpose. At which point we focus less on learning (submissive and self-directed) and more on acting (dominance to externally directed).
We think largely of less subtle urges like hunger, thirst, attention, association, cooperation, and sex: capacities that must be fulfilled. And while we acknowledge boredom as a cognitive capacity that seeks fulfillment, and we infrequently admit that females seek fulfillment of cognitive want for attention and males seek fulfillment of cognitive want for tool use, we overlook that Empathy is a cognitive capacity that seeks cognitive load, just as male analysis is a cognitive capacity seeking load. This is why women with children, especially five or more (the historical norm) demonstrate conservative(hypercapitalizing) behaviors, and men without children demonstrate libertine(hyper consuming) behaviors. It’s why females seek chatter and gossip and men various material crafts (hobbies). And since most of us are some mixture of the two sets of influences (variations in cognitive dimorphism) we can demonstrate the spectrum.
In other words, we should not take women without children seriously in sociology, economics, politics, strategy, and war, any more than we should take the left without equal accountability seriously in those fields. In other words, in colloquial terms, leftism is the female expression of ‘sh-t testing’: generating demand from dominant(conservative) males to produce more desirable outcomes (hyperconsumption) or to be threatened with uncooperativeness, GSRRM (undermining), deprivation of attention, care, affection and sex. The difference being that we have no need for the left nor want for them and they have nothing to trade (and we nothing to trade with them).
The left is cognitively female (heightened sensitivity to fear, fear of lower priority, of inequality, of being left behind) and lacking cognitively male cognitive bias for political decisions (scarcity of resources infinity of demands), the necessity of capitalization (saving) and CONSTRAINING population within the polity (‘that equilibrium of population vs resource, vs competitors that is calculable’).
This is because (a) males cannot directly reproduce, and must capture territory, resources, and females from competitors, and constrain reproduction to their kin group in order to persist. This reproduction can be forcible as we see in most animals. It can be prolific and indiscriminate like we see in bonobos. It can include pairing off as we see in some species. Or it can be cooperative (calculating) as it evolved in humans (serial mating). (b) The female reproductive strategy is to capture the best genes she can while false-promising (seducing but not delivering, baiting into hazard) the maximum rents on the male population.
This is the origin of the Abrahamic method of deceit: (a) presumption of the value of cooperation (false). (b) avoidance of physical threats of violence (fast) and reliance on undermining(slow) as a proxy for violence (informational and social threats), (c) social construction of narrative of undermining as a means of organizing competition vs military and resource pursuit against competitors as a means of organizing competition, (d) plausible deniability of undermining (slow) vs violence (fast), (e) unaccountability by submission to evidentiary violence vs inescapability from plausibly deniable false accusation to undermine. (f) the use of pervasive lying in order to control children at low cost, by the construction of mythological narratives (sophistry, mysticism, pseudoscience). (g) and perhaps the most devastating: the desire to maintain this emotional coercive ability by infantilization of and perpetuation of ignorance in the population, vs male need for adult males with objective (truthful empirical) agency in order to resist competitors.
TESTS OF SEX DIFFERENCES IN COGNITION
We’ve identified simple tests of female cognitive bias and absence of cognitive agency (possibility of truth):
(a) Denial of scarcity
(b) Denial of meritocracy
(c) NAXALT(inability to distinguish a curve,
(d) desirability conflated with truth,
(e) denial of evidence
(f) Evasion by GSRRM,
(g) posturing false value of cooperation (sex proxy).
Like many things, once you identify the incentives, the evolutionary necessity, and the extension of that evolutionary necessity from physics, you find that all human behavior is just the need for acquisition, means of savings, vs reproductive strategy. and reproductive strategy is just female hyperconsumption vs male hyper capitalization.
And once you make it to that conclusion, you realize that males developed civilization in order to compete for females, but it was only possible upon the evolution of the ability to capitalize with property.
Ergo, civilization wasn’t possible until the domestication of plants, animals, and yes, man. And the control of territory to do so. And the production of commons (capital improvements) to territories that provided discounts (returns) of compound (repeating) value.
And here we find the crux of the political problem we face today: (a)incalculability because of digital fiat money, (b) incalculability of scale (democracy), (c) incommensurability of left and right political demands under these conditions. (d) the natural dysgenic collapse of equalitarian societies, (e) the natural eugenic evolution of meritocratic societies.
The hunter agrarian age is past. Agrarian group strategies, traditions< norms, morals<ethics, institutions<laws, paradigms<ideas are no longer the utility that they once were.
The agrarian age limited our evolution – froze us in time – in exchange for increasing our numbers and SLOWING what had been hyper rapid evolution over the past ten thousands of years.
The European age that re-united the world, let us discover our races and differences, again, stopped our speciation, slowed evolution, but accelerated technological adaptation, which in turn accelerated reproduction of genetic load- reversing the evolution that only East Asians and Western Europeans had created during the agrarian age.
Humans, like all other animals, and apparently more so given our rate of adaptation, accumulate defects (“genetic load”). We sort into classes: a hierarchy of sexual, social, economic, politicla, military value. And in most societies, we sort not by individuals but into clans by that social sexual economic, political, and military value. While through most of history about a third of females and as much as two-thirds of males failed to reproduce. And while in northern europe, under manorialism, most married much later, producing fewer offspring, and twenty percent or more failed to reproduce, the rest of the world continued reproduction at the bottom with warmer climates providing higher disease gradients but higher rates of reproductive survival at the bottom, and colder climates the opposite.
At present, after half a millennia of european conceptual, scientific, technological, economic, and political innovation, and after almost two centuries of the industrial revolution, we have equilibrated geographic and developmental differences. And we are wealthy enough for having done so to desire to, and demand, to fulfill our political preferences at the scale of states that we had fulfilled under villages and city-states.
We ended the eugenics program postwar, that was aboriginal a liberal program, even though the Germans – no matter how politically incorrect it is to say – were right. We ended limiting immigration to equally genetically pacified (evolved) peoples. And we have allowed anti-evolutionary religions of Judaism and Islam in particular into Europe despite Islam’s long-standing attempt to destroy European civilization, and Judaism’s continuous hostility to it. Because both of these religions are evolutionary for the masses which is why Judaism is the origin of Marxism, postmodernism, and HBD-denialism. (Socialism in the continental tradition rather than the Marxist is just a continuation of the policies of the Catholic Church – which again, was a devolutionary submissive religion only escaped by Protestantism and the eugenic consequences of Northern European manorialism.
There is only one solution: the solution the Europeans have practiced throughout our history: the restoration of political competition between states, each of which satisfies slightly different needs for the more eugenically evolved (northern Europe, less eugenically evolved, eastern Europe, and less eugenically evolved neolithic Europe of the south. And far less evolved rest of the world other than Han, Korean, and Japanese east who alone, like northern Europe, spent the past millennia in eugenic evolution. While the rest of the world expanded dysgenia.
So we can die off and fall to south American, Indian, middle eastern, or African dysgenia, ignorance, incompetence, and poverty, or we can separate as we have throughout our european history into a thousand nations, and let peoples make their own choices and pay the cost of their choices, and let evidence accomplish what opinion and argument cannot.
THE SOLUTION TO THE GREAT PROBLEM OF PHILOSOPHY. YES, REALLY.
—“I’ve been spending a lot of time thinking about this post. It is an unedited hodgepodge of ideas, with typos, on Facebook, with 10 likes.
And yet, it claims to have solved a great problem spanning as far back as Aristotle.
I would really like to see this explained more. A formal essay, with references would be great. I’d like to see it part of the greater discussion of contemporary thinkers.
Can you share thoughts on more recent approaches to the demarcation problem? Pigliucci? Mahner? Hansson? Haack? Laudan? Etc. I’d love to see some of these people respond to your solution.Curt Doolittle,Eric Danelaw
I heard Haack saying that Bacon was an excellent Chancellor, but “no scientist”.
It looks like you’ve completely shifted the frame from a philosophical question to a legal question. I’d like to try to put it in my own words, but I’m still trying to wrap my head around all the different arguments.
If this is really a breakthrough in our understanding of science (which it looks like to me so far), I would want it to have a more formal presentation than a sloppy Facebook post with 10 likes.
(accountability) (knowledge required) vs (evasion of liability) (pretense of knowledge)
So, yes, I can construct it from first principles – (I have) and it’s quite long, so this ‘sketch’ is an overview to synthesize the subject for (close) followers.
What I think you’re asking for is a bridge between the diversity of conventions (sects) and the grammars, and from the grammars to P-logic and from P-logic to p-law. When, frankly, sects in philosophy are as diverse as the sects of Christianity if not more so. Because they are all not-quite-right paradigms (incommensurable).
If I went through a bridge argument it would only be possible AFTER having taught enough of the grammars, p-logic, and p-law, without ending up in millions of rat-holes of trying to answer objections without common foundations.
Those ‘sects’ would now (in my understanding) be categorized as
pseudosciences or sophistries the same way we have recategorized theology as either mythology or supernatural sophistry.
The same would be said for formal logic, psychology, sociology, a good bit of economics, law, and politics. Just as we purged the sophistry and supernatural from those fields, we will (P does) purge sophistry and pseudoscience from those fields.
Now, if we take Haak, she’s attacking the postmodernists (especially rorty) on their terms. If we state his or her arguments in economics and law they are no longer complicated, but trivial. Mahner is doing what I think is the job of philosophers, which is taking scientific progress in a field, reorganizing the paradigm (ontology) dependent upon the evolutionary ideas in the discoveries, and integrating and adapting that paradigm into the broader paradigm we call testimony (truth) or science. (What the grammars do is put all paradigms into one commensurable paradigm).
And what we find in all but one or two thinkers per generation, is that philosophy (if you read papers) it has been reduced to commentary on commentary on error. It’s embarrassing to read philosophy. It’s no different from medievalists commenting on comments on nonsense-scripture.
So for example, if I said, that we use mathematical logic (measurements), and set logic (words), but we are missing operational logic (actions in time) between them – the interesting question is ‘why’? Law does it? Why don’t other fields?
So: human logical facility(measures of constant religions in
existence(observations)) > human action facility (human actions
(demonstrations)) > human grammatical facility(human speech
(suggestions)) > human hearing (synthesis of suggestion (imagination))
Same problem throughout all fields. Why does ‘is’ exist in our language and is it only implied in others?
So it’s not an essay. It’s the ‘dummies guide’ that supplies the foundations.
From that point one can go tot he book for the full workup.
Or we can have ‘bridge’ arguments with other philosophers.
But there are things you can’t discuss without the underlying logic.
So, what you will discover at the end of the journey is that humans seek to avoid costs at all costs and most human thought other than math, science, engineering are constructed primarily of lies because the thinkers have no other means of coercing others in order to obtain self-worth, attention, something to trade, and material advantage.
In other words, the pre-requisite is the dummies version. Right now I have so many projects going on and it’s probably the most important one that I SHOULD work on. Which depends on either trump winning and buying me another four years, or me just going back to Europe and ignoring it all from there.
THE FORMAL SCIENCES (LOGICS)
While we are nearly all familiar with
Mathematics: (Logic of Existence)
the logic of ordinal (positional) names (position in an order of names, not in space or time.) The beauty of mathematics is in that there is only one property: position in an order (base number system). It’s the dumbest language that’s possible. Just as binary is the dumbest mathematics we can invent. Mathematics is the dumbest language can invent. We use math to measure (sense and perceive) that which is beyond your natural sense perception retention.) We use it to measure what we don’t (or can’t) know.
And we are at least aware of:
Logic (the logic of sets)
The logic of sets. So while a positional name (say forty-two), … We use language to SUGGEST ( force ourselves, or others to rely on deduction, induction, abduction, guessing, and auto-association) extremely complex sets of relations with
Operations (Operationalism) The logic of Actions in Time
The Logic of Sentience (language)
(…)
So just as say, when counting can only increase or decrease in position or not, actions can only be executed in a sequence or not. Just as there are only so many operations in arithmetic (really, just adding and removing), but in combinations we can produce all of mathematics, human being sare only able to sense perceive (model by auto association), predict (auto association), imagine (auto association and attention), think (recurse by auto attention, association, and recursion), act (change body state), and speak. So the operations available to people are much more complex. In between mathematics and action is programming, which is a more constrained logic, limited to the sets of operations available to the software, which is limited to the sets of operations limited to the hardware.
RESULTS:
Mathematics
(Geometry constrained by three dimensions and time.)
(and not constrained by space, time, and optionally cost)
… Arithmetic: The Logic of Counting
… Geometry: The Logic of Lines (Constancy)
… Calculus: The Logic of Curves (Change)
… Statistics: The Logic of Variation (Commensurability)
… Probability: The Logic of Prediction (Time or non-time)
… ‘Economics’: The Logic of Equilibration
… Algebra: The logic of deduction with positional names (balance)
Operations:
(Actions constrained by available operations)
(and Constrained by space, time, cost, incentives)
… Programmatic operations (speed)
… Bayesian Operations (volume, precision)
… Sequences of actions in time (actions, procedures, processes)
Set Operations:
(ideals free of operational constraints and time.)
(and not constrained by space, time, cost or incentives)
… Propositional logic – reasoning about sentences and their logical connections (and, or, …).
… First-order predicate logic – reasoning about quantified quantities and domain-specific functions/predicates (like addition in arithmetic) that make up sentences.
… Higher-order predicate logics – extend first-order logic to quantify not just over variables, but also over sets, sets of sets, etc.
… Modal logics – reasoning about “modalities” of sentences. Common meanings are: possibility/necessity, always/eventually, obligation/permission, knowledge/belief.
ORIGINAL POST:
KARL POPPER’S DEMARCATION PROBLEM IS SOLVED, AND THE CRITICAL RATIONALIST PROGRAM OF FALSIFICATION IS COMPLETE: IT WAS LAW ALL ALONG. AND HAYEK WAS RIGHT.
As far as I know, western success in science, technology, medicine, and economics was due to the transfer of our legal tradition (including traditional european law to Aristotle to Bacon to Hume to Hayek) – and the failure of our philosophers to understand that transfer.
That legal tradition includes a Metaphysical Traditional Contract:
1 – A Universal Militia Regardless of Cost
2 – Excellence and Heroism Regardless of Cost
3 – Duty and Commons Regardless of Cost
4 – Truth and Oath Regardless of Cost
5 – Promise and Contract Regardless of Cost
6 – Sovereignty and Reciprocity Regardless of Cost
7 – The Natural Law and Jury Regardless of Cost
8 – Wherein every man a soldier, sheriff, judge, and his own legislator, of his own demonstrated interests.
9 – And as a result – the only possibility for social organization is Voluntary Markets in:
.. – association
.. .. – cooperation
.. .. .. – production
.. .. .. .. – reproduction
.. .. .. .. .. – commons
.. .. .. .. .. .. – polities
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. – war.
10 – Together producing the fastest possible means of human adaptation to circumstances;
11 – Including the continuous evolutionary production of Human Agency (human capital);
12 – By the domestication of man by market eugenics,
13 – And as a result, the direction of surpluses to the production of commons, and the multiples of returns produced therefrom;
14 – Including the unique high trust society;
15 – And the informational, scientific, technological, medical, economic, social, political, and military benefits therefrom.
16 – Yielding a genetic distribution free of the burden of underclass consumption, and the costs of their organization, administration, and care.
These are the organizing principles of western civilization, and what separates the west from the rest, and origin of that separation is in truth before face, cost to self-image, cost to the competence hierarchy, and cost to the dominance hierarchy, where truth refers to martial testimonial truth (what the military calls ‘reporting’, warrantied by the speaker, given the consequences that result from error, bias, and deceit in military contexts.
India is an extended family, china is a family bureaucracy, the west a military hierarchy, and semitia is feminine supernatural dependency: a civilization of and for women.
CRITICAL RATIONALISM
So, the demarcation in law between testifiability and fiction, is legal due diligence (falsification).
DUE DILIGENCE
Man can perform due diligence against every dimension perceivable by man:
6 – reciprocal consistency (rational choice between parties in affected by any change in state),
7 – limites and completeness (full accounting within stated limits),
8 – sufficient to meet demand for infallibility of decidability by all parties affected directly or indirectly by the display word ord deed,
9 – and warrantied by possibility of the speaker’s restitution of all parties affected by display word or deed.
In other words, yes, one of the demarcations between science and non-science is falsificationary, and requires not only the test of falsifiability, but due diligence against falsehood in all dimensions perceivable by man, and warranty to falsify the incentive to escape due diligence.
EPISTEMOLOGY
Another is that the individual alone can perform that due diligence, or that the process of due diligence includes only:
… [ Problem -> Theory -> Test -> Repeat ] …
Instead of:
… [ Observation -> Question(problem) -> Free association -> hypothesis -> falsification by one’s reason -> falsification by the full set of dimensions falsifiable by man above -> Propositional Theory -> Falsification by Application in the Market for Solutions to Problems -> Settled (Surviving) Theory -> Presumption -> Metaphysical Presumption ] …
Under increasing scope of ‘markets’ (competitions) from the mind(imagination) demonstrated actions (due diligence), to the market for applications (applied).
And this epistemological sequence applies for all knowledge claims regardless of the discipline, paradigms, and logic within that discipline.
CRITICAL PREFERENCE
And this brings us to where else Popper – like all literary (platonic) philosophers failed: costs. Costs of due diligence, costs of internal consistency, costs of operational possibility, Costs of empirical (external) correspondence, costs to others if one errs, implies, or deceives, and costs of liability for one’s displays words and deeds if one errs, suggests, implies, or deceives.
In other words, where philosophers are (like theologians) conventionally forgiven their use of suggestion and deceit, scientists, like testimony in court, are not. And this explains the causal relationship between the horrifying damage done by theology and philosophy while providing and questionable good, and the profound gains done by science and its unquestionable goods: raising mankind out of ignorance, superstition, tyranny, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, and the vicissitudes of a nature all but hostile to advanced life.
THE AGE OF VERBALISM AND THE AGE OF OPERATIONS
Philosophers generally work in sets (verbal associations), and ideals, while the law, engineering work in operations (sequences of actions) and the material. And while sets are largely verbal constructs free of cost, action, operations, engineering, science, law and economics include costs.
This is why there is a high correlation between moralizing and philosophy, and a high correlation between science and law. Because moralizing does seeks general rules regardless of cost, and sciences and law seek general rules including costs.
It also explains why the west developed geometry (engineering and technology) and the orient algebra (astrology and theology). And it explains the western restoration by Descartes’s restoration of mathematics from language to geometry. And the development of calculus because of our return to european geometry.
And that, in turn, explains western religion’s development of law, philosophy, epicureanism, and unfortunately stoicism, of the middle classes, and the middle east’s development of monotheistic (totalitarian) religion of the underclasses.
Why does this matter? Popper never performed a study of scientific research, he just used reason to state that choices in scientific investigation was undecidable.
But it’s demonstrably false. The problem in scientific exploration like any form of action (engineering), is that as distance from human scale increases. either smaller or larger, the costs of investigation increases, and as such we pursue the information we can afford to.
And this turns out to be the optimum means of investigation. And this corresponds to the physical and human world’s behavior: nature must take the least cost action possible, and humans do as well – as long as we make a full accounting of causes (incentives).
DEMARCATION IS SOLVED
So the demarcation problem is solved. The word for science is due diligence under the law of reciprocity, in pursuit of giving warrantable testimony about the world regardless of our ignorance, error, bias, wishful-thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, propaganda, fictionalisms, and deceits.
BUT ALSO, PHILOSOPHY IS SOLVED
Philosophy now, like the logics, is complete for truth and limited only to preference within the limits provided by physical laws of Nature, and the Natural law of cooperation: Reciprocity within the Limits of Proportionality.
Truth is, and always has been, a subject of testimony under the law of reciprocity, and that discipline we call science, is merely our means of due diligence in pursuit of falsifying our testimony so that we may warranty and accept liability for our truth claims.
WHERE WERE WE FIND:
DEFLATIONARY GRAMMARS (LOGICS)
1 – Mathematics for the measurement of constant relations.
.. 2 – Operations for the measurement of existential possibility.
.. .. 3 – Reciprocity for the measurement of ethics.
.. .. .. 4 – Science (falsification) for the measurement of due diligence against error, bias, and deceit.
AND DESCRIPTIVE GRAMMARS (LOGICS)
.. .. .. .. 5 – Testimony for the truth claims under the promise of due diligence.
.. .. .. .. .. 6 – Philosophy for choice within the testifiable.
.. .. .. .. .. .. 7 – History for what we have done, and literature for what we might do.
AND INFLATIONARY GRAMMARS (LOGICS)
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. 8 – Myths, Legends, Fairy Tales, Parables, and Rhymes for pedagogy of the young, and the most error-free preservation of the consistency of accumulated wisdom over time.
All else is ignorance, error, bias, wishful-thinking, fictionalism, propaganda, and deceit. And baiting into hazard, using the fictionalisms of denialism, social-construction, idealism, pseudoscience, and the supernatural, is most advanced technology of deceiving other humans.
And philosophers have a long history of making false claims that bait our peoples into hazard, because they have failed to perform due diligence against the consequences of the harms that are the direct or indirect consequences of the falsehoods that they have advocated.
DEMARCATION IS SOLVED
Not only have we demarcated science from non-science, but we have demarcated math, operations, reciprocity, science, testimony, philosophy, history, literature, and myth.
Popper’s program is complete. We just don’t want to be accountable for paying the cost of due diligence, so we preserve philosophy like we preserve theology – to escape responsibility for our thoughts words and deeds.
WHERE THE DEMAND FOR INCREASING INFALLIBILITY OF DECIDABILITY YIELDS THE SERIES:
1 – Intelligible: Decidable enough to imagine a conceptual relationship
.. 2 – Reasonable: Decidable enough for me to feel confident that my decision will satisfy my needs, and is not a waste of time, energy, resources.
.. .. 3 – Actionable: Decidable enough for me to take actions given time, effort, knowledge, resources.
.. .. .. 4 – Ethical and Moral: Decidable enough for me to not impose risk or costs upon the interests of others, or cause others to retaliate against me, if they have knowledge of and transparency into my actions.
.. .. .. .. 5 – Normative: Decidable enough to resolve a conflict without subjective opinion among my fellow people with similar values.
.. .. .. .. .. 6 – Judicial: Decidable enough to resolve a conflict without subjective opinion across different peoples with different knowledge, comprehension and values.
.. .. .. .. .. .. 7 – Scientific: Decidable regardless of all opinions or perspectives “True”)
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. 8 – Logical: Decidable out of physical or logical necessity
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 9 – Tautological: Decidedly identical in properties (referents) if not references (terms). So to borrow one of the many terms from Economics, we can see in this series (list) a market demand for increasingly infallible decidability.
AND WHERE WE CAN WARRANTY THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE PROMISE OF INFALLIBILITY OF DECIDABILITY:
1 – True enough to imagine a conceptual relationship
.. 2 – True enough for me to feel good about myself.
.. .. 3 – True enough for me to take actions that produce positive results.
.. .. .. 4 – True enough for me to not cause others to react negatively to me.
.. .. .. .. 5 – True enough to resolve a conflict without subjective opinion among my fellow people with similar values.
.. .. .. .. .. 6 – True enough to resolve a conflict without subjective opinion across different peoples with different values.
.. .. .. .. .. .. 7 – True regardless of all opinions or perspectives.
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. 8 – Tautologically true: in that the two things are equal.
WHERE DECIDABILITY CONSISTS IN
a) In the REVERSE: a question (statement) is DECIDABLE if an algorithm (set of operations) exists within the limits of the system (rules, axioms, theories) that can produce a decision (choice) absent discretion. In other words, if the sufficient information for the decision is present (ie: is decidable) within the system�(ie: grammar).
b) In the OBVERSE: Instead, we should determine if there is a means of choosing without the need for additional information supplied from outside the system (ie: not discretionary).
Or in simple terms, if DISCRETION is necessary the question is undecidable, and if discretion is unnecessary, a proposition is decidable. This separates reason (or calculation in the wider sense) from computation (algorithm).
WHERE GRAMMAR refers to the rules of continuous recursive disambiguation given the dimensions included in the paradigm(network of constant relations), and consequent limits on vocabulary and logic within those dimensions.
AND WHERE TRUTH CONSISTS IN THE SERIES
1 – Tautological Truth: That testimony you give when promising the equality of two statements using different terms: A circular definition, a statement of equality or a statement of identity.
2 – Analytic Truth: The testimony you give promising the internal consistency of one or more statements used in the construction of a proof in an axiomatic(declarative) system. (a Logical Truth).
3 – Ideal Truth: That testimony (description) you would give, if your knowledge (information) was complete, your language was sufficient, stated without error, cleansed of bias, and absent deceit, within the scope of precision limited to the context of the question you wish to answer; and the promise that another possessed of the same knowledge (information), performing the same due diligence, having the same experiences, would provide the same testimony. (Ideal Truth = Perfect Parsimony.)
4 – Truthfulness: that testimony (description) you give if your knowledge (information) is incomplete, your language is insufficient, you have performed due diligence in the elimination of error, imaginary content, wishful thinking, bias, fictionalism, and deceit; within the scope of precision limited to the question you wish to answer; and which you warranty to be so; and the promise that another possessed of the knowledge, performing the same due diligence, having the same experiences, would provide the same testimony.
5 – Honesty: that testimony (description) you give with full knowledge that knowledge is incomplete, your language is insufficient, but you have not performed due diligence in the elimination of error and bias, but which you warranty is free of deceit; within the scope of precision limited to the question you wish to answer; and the promise that another possess of the same knowledge (information), performing the same due diligence, having the same experiences, would provide the same testimony.
AND WHERE THE CRITERIA FOR TRUTHFUL SPEECH IS COHERENCE ACROSS THE DIMENSIONS TESTIFIABLE BY MAN, IN THE SERIES:
Q: Why is Western civilization the only one worthy of leading humanity?
I understand the question, but it is framed incorrectly. Let’s try to reframe it.
If we mean lead as rule or govern, that’s clearly false. It’s clearly false because the indo Europeans disappeared whenever they tried to rule other peoples, rather than decimate and integrate, or exterminate and replace them. The reason being that the cost to Indo Europeans (“Aryans”) of transforming large populations such was tried by the Hittites in anatolia (1600bc), the indo-iranics in India (1500bc), the iranic-Persians in the middle east (~1500bc), all resulted in their eventual reverse-conquest by the majority peoples. The Indian subcontinent (the Indus valley civilization and the Indian subcontinent) and the eastern middle east (Iran, the South-Caucuses, and eastern Anatolia), and especially Mesopotamia, were developed civilizations with long religious histories and large populations. We saw the same consequences for the Spanish in South America, and we are seeing the same problem with the south American recolonization and repopulation of North America – now 20% of our population, and within a few generations half of it.
Whereas the western Indo-Europeans (European Aryans) did not enter more mature territories with dense populations evolved from river-irrigation systems separated by arid ‘seas’ of near-desert. Instead, the early european farmers had migrated from Anatolia, across the Mediterranean, up the Atlantic coast, created the monolith civilization, and then moved eastward again reaching today’s Poland, producing a set of relatively sedentary low density, farms. And when the new West Indo-Europeans (Aryans) arrived, they appear to have killed most of the men, kept the women, animals, land, and tools, then bred with the women at a ratio of something on the order of 17 women to one man – thereby largely replaced the population. In the island of Britain nearly completely replacing the population. Note the parallel with the european conquest of the Americas. These Aryan conquerors spread westward in horizontal bands, founding the Italic, Celtic, Germanic, North Germanic (Scandinavian), Baltic, and Slavic Peoples. Note the parallel with the cultural bands across North America that still reflect the origins of the British, Scotts-Irish, Germans, and French who settled there. Or the (unfortunate) change in New England by the massive immigration of catholic Italians and Irish, and finally Eastern European Jews.
Instead of lead as in rule, if we mean are Europeans the only ones worthing of providing mankind with leadership by which we mean discover opportunities other civilizations can benefit from, then only western civilization has led, and can lead, humanity into transcendence over the limitations of the physical, natural and evolutionary laws, and into a future where we are not under constant threat of extinction by human, as well as natural, geological, solar, and galactic forces that are all but hostile to life.
If we instead or also mean “lead” as in preventing harm to humanity by revolutionary ideas, ideologies, philosophies, religions, states, and peoples, then that is also possibly true – it’s just profoundly costly and risky, as we have found in the past century and a half.
A better framing then, is that western civilization’s primary value to mankind is our rapidity of adaptation, innovation, and evolution, because Europeans and only Europeans and perhaps east Asians, are willing to pay the high cost of rapid adaptation, innovation, and evolution, and that is in part because we are the only people to have institutions that both facilitate that rapidity in the middle and upper classes who are stressed by creating that continuous change, as well as sedate the stresses of that rapid adaptation in the lower middle and lower classes who are stressed by that continuous change.
A worse framing is that, given that all other civilizations failed to pay the high costs of discovery, adaptation to, and application of the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe, and that in the absence of western civilization humanity might have, and still might, have failed to pass The Great Filter. So one position is to say Europeans are more useful to mankind than the rest, and the other is to say we are the only use to mankind. And this utility is more obvious once we study the geological record, and grasp that man evolved rather quickly due to a very brief, natural, geological, solar, and galactic time period, and that we do not have an endless amount of time to develop mastery of our future – if we are to have one.
So the question is why? Why are europeans uniquely suited to lead by example, and defend ourselves, mankind, and the future.
THE ANSWER:
“We Calculate The Continuous Possibility of the Future”. Because we Pay the Costs Other Civilizations Can’t Pay or Even Imagine Paying: Truth Regardless of Cost, Duty Regardless of Cost, Commons Regardless of Cost, Adaptation Regardless of Cost, Evolution Regardless of Cost, where The Only Solution to internal Conflict is a Superior Solution.
THE EXPLANATION
For historical reasons that cannot be duplicated, Europeans uniquely organized the entire society as a militia (voluntary) army, protecting large herds and territories, conducting entrepreneurial (voluntary) maneuver warfare, using horse, bronze, and wheel. The demands of this social organization caused Europeans to develop institutions differently from other civilizations. As such Europeans developed the institutions of self-determination (individual sovereignty), the militia (army), and rule of law by tort law (property) before the institutions of either religion or state.
The combination of technical epistemology(metallurgy, horse domestication, chariot) and military epistemology (unforgiving), military ‘reporting’ (just the facts, regardless of cost to the status hierarchy), and testimony before peers using this form of military reporting (empirical testimony), created the european cognitive framework, language, norms, traditions, and institutions, dependent upon testimony, oath, and reciprocity: realism (material existence), naturalism (causes), and operationalism (action).
Their military success created a tradition of heroism (for the common good), converted them from agrarian mythology to, the primacy of man, the self-determination of man, and the ability of man to compete with if not defeat the gods (archetypes).
Their law of individual self-determination, individual sovereignty, left the only means of action possible as reciprocity, including reciprocity in speech, left only markets (voluntary associations) for association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons (government), polities, alliances, and war. Or conversely, their universal militia, of relatively equal professional warriors financed by families and clans, left no alternative other than rule of law of tort (property) as the means of self-organization (political order). As such General, King and Judge are functional synonyms.
They then conquered and ruled agrarian peoples (from the Anatolian expansion) and domesticated (whether they killed, ruled, enfranchised, enserfed, or enslaved) man for profit the way that they had domesticated themselves, cattle, and horses.
With this metaphysics of naturalism, operationalism, the primacy of man, of discovery rather than regularity or cyclicality, of continuous adversarialism (competition) in all walks of life, demonstrating one’s excellence (heroism), Europeans converted the entire civilization into the continuous calculation by trial and error of evolution of man at the fastest pace possible.
So Europeans have been fastest (if fragile) even if not first. This is the secret to european genetic, cognitive, cultural, institutional, and military superiority: the application of maneuver to all walks of life, creating rapid innovation and adaptation as the group’s evolutionary strategy. It’s not a secret why Europeans use the OODA loop in war – it’s what we have always used in every aspect of life.
While other civilizations sought to avoid adapting to physical, natural, and evolutionary laws. Europeans discovered, adapted to, and applied the laws of the universe: the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws. Over 98% of discoveries were made by Europeans for these reasons. And in just a few hundred years prior to the bronze age collapse; in just a few centuries before the Semitic Dark Ages of Ignorance (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam) sought to reverse those advances. But once Aristotle and literacy were restored to Europe, Europeans created the revolutions we call empirical, literacy, agrarian, commercial, financial, scientific, technological and biological, in just a few centuries in the modern world.
But just as the Jews invented Christianity in the ancient world, the Jews invented Marxism, socialism, postmodernism, and feminism and sought to reverse those modern advances by the false promise of freedom from physical scarcity (marxism, communism, socialism), reciprocity (positive law, social democracy), evolution (feminism, market eugenics, regression to the mean). Just as they had used the false promise of life after death in the ancient world for the same reasons: to undermine and reverse european (and Persia, and Chinese, and Indian) innovations.
Europe was able to recover from the dark ages because while ‘intellectual’ (clerical) thought had abandoned european tradition and adopted Semitic supernaturalism, the military aristocracy, the law, and to some degree the majority of people outside the urban centers, retained european (west indo european) traditions. So when Aristotle was restored, our intellectual and legal and technological traditions were re-harmonized. And we are still in the process of re-harmonizing religion (if that will ever be possible I am uncertain.).
However, the postwar jewish program to undermine western civlization, by repeating bolshevism here, by repeating christianity in the ancient world, and be repeating judiasm’s hostility to empires in the egyptian and mesopotamian eras, has been successful in this age for the same reasons it was successful in those previous two ages: because there are large numbers of peole readily willing to fall for the false promise of freedom from physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and the high costs of doing so, by claiming thaat ruling empires oppress them rather than defend mankind against those who destroy civlization from wihin by hyperreproduction, hyperconsumption, and the consumption of all surpluses so that proceeds cannot be directed to the production of capitalizing commns that produce returns for all over generations.
TERRIFYING LESSONS
There are terrifying lessons here:
Only Europeans managed to develop law and rule of law of reciprocity in demonstrated interests, as their first institution, preventing ‘authority’, that produces stagnation.
Only Europeans managed to institutionalize military reporting, court testimony, and church ‘confession’ as ‘truth before face regardless of cost’, and that’s why only Europeans had (until 1960) a high trust truth first civilization. (the Japanese and Koreans are close).
Only Europeans managed to develop and maintain a military (militia, army) of everyone, under entrepreneurial warfare, so that status was available to anyone who demonstrated investment in the community – causing competition for enfranchisement by demonstrated investment (at risk) in the community.
Only Europeans managed to develop evolutionary order using Adversarialsim (demonstrated competitive advantage), realism( Realism, Naturalism, Operationalism, Testimonialism), Natural Law (rule of law by test of reciprocity) and markets in everything, and a non-static, no- regressive worldview (metaphysics).
Only Europeans and East Asians managed to institutionalize agrarian eugenics (suppression of underclass reproduction), and the resulting expansion of the genetic-middle class. This combination of law first (Europe) and state first (china) military orders, in homogenous polities, or at least, polities that were ethnically close enough to integrate, and the suppression of reproduction are necessary to reduce the drag on civilization by the underclasses.
In this sense – which again is terrifying – all other civilizations failed. All other civilizations sought to escape physical natural and evolutionary laws. All others either disappeared. Or declined. Or stagnated. Worse, the most effective political system in the world – Islam is antithetical to human progress. It destroyed the genetics, knowledge, arts, institutions, traditions, and cultures – everything- in five great civilizations. As first the Arabs peaked and failed, then the Mongols, then the Turks. The Indians are interesting but they developed healthy religion, weak states, and weak law. In other words. It is extremely easy for life to fail to pass thru the great filter. And at present, the current threat is that the eugenicists were right.
We see the inability to adopt european ‘sensemaking’ across the world. We see it in programmers, in scientists, in authors, in every civilization – outside of Europeans, academic works are imitations of academic work. We see it in Einstein and Bohr vs Hilbert and Brouwer. We see it everywhere. We see it in Jewish jurists and anglo jurists. We see it in Jewish economists and anglo economists.
What is that european sense-making: the reduction of answers to all questions to material first causes under realism, naturalism, operationalism, and reciprocity in display word and deed – and not to desirability. Europeans solve for true, then try to create desirable circumstances based upon that truth. In other words, europeans pay all costs.
LEAD BY EXAMPLE, OR LEAD BY EXAMPLE AND DEFENSE, OR LEAD BY RULE, EXAMPLE, AND DEFENSE?
So we can choose: To disappear. To defend ourselves rather than lead. To lead oursleves rather than others. To lead ourselves, and others by example. To lead ourselves and ‘sell our services of rule’ to others, whle maintaining home territories. To lead by example while maintaining defense of mankind. Or lead by rule, example, and defense of mankind. Or lead by extermination of resistance in mankind. And the question is which of those choices is possible given the costs involved, our resouces, and our numbers? There are three choices that are not suicidal, and we can achieve, and that we can achieve without disappearing into the peole ruled: To lead ourselves, insulate ourselves, and not lead others; or to lead our elves, and others by example; or to lead by the gradual extermination of resistance in mankind.
So it’s not that Europeans must ‘lead’ it’s more that Europeans must remain and compete since all other civilizations are adopting our technology but are in the process of regressing to pre-European colonial organization – by whatever institutions that they had before.
Their weakness, which is why the Hittites, Spartans, and Romans are lost to us, is that domestication of the population worked exclusively in from their own numbers, and achieved scale only northern Europe, because the numbers of the aristocracy do not scale. As such the only solution is to enfranchise the middle, and eliminate, enslave, enserf, or religiously domesticate (Christianity) the peasantry.
So Greece overextended into territories with vast underclasses (the middle east), Rome repeated the mistake. The Europeans decimated the Americas temporarily limiting the problem. But the postwar Jewish program to undermine western civilization from within by marxism, neo-marxism, postmodernism, feminism, human difference denialism, and saturation of the population with self-hatred of their history was successful – if only because immigration and the defection of single european women was enough to end intergenerational transmission of those traditions of western civilization. (just as the Jewish Christians had done to Rome.)
COMPETING VISIONS
Europeans: Europeans move fast, and like Rome seek to ‘mature’ ruled (colonized) people into market participants.
China: China moves slowly and seeks to genetically culturally and institutionally transform genetic near neighbors into pseudo-Han. The Han ruling peoples have been exceptionally successful. Second only to Islam. With beneficial rather than Islam’s catastrophic consequences. China’s problem is limited to face-before-truth, failure to develop rule of law, the corruption that results, and Chinese disregard for human life, as well as irresponsibility for others and commons that results. Chinese developed the state and bureaucracy as their first institution. So Confucius directed all Chinese to focus on the family and harmony and Sun Tzu to “delay and deceive” and the Chinese have formalized those three strategies – and they understand they are using them. They have zero tolerance for ‘internal conflict or competition’, zero tolerance for ‘un-Chinese’, and are just as racist as Indians and Jews. This is the optimum strategy for expansion over time at the cost of innovation.
Russians: The Russians have tried to copy the Chinese strategy, albeit defensively, first by reversal of the Mongol conquest Russia, then through the Russian expansion, then through the soviet expansion, and now through the Russian re-expansion (Belarus, Ukraine, and maybe more).
Judaism/Islam: Islam raids until collapse, then colonizes from the bottom up using religion. Judaism undermines from the top down. Christianity (oddly enough) prepares people for market society (treating all others as customers, with exhaustive forgiveness).
Judaism: The Jews seek to undermine host people’s group cohesion under the auspices of making the world safe for jews – but the result is making the world safe for Islam. They seek to destroy european martial tradition, masculinity, meritocracy, capitalization of commons, truthful reciprocal speech, dependent upon realism and naturalism, and limited to physical (scarcity), natural (reciprocity), and evolutionary (regression to the mean) laws.
India: India will continue to pursue ethnonationalism in order to prevent further increase in the cancer of islam.
Japanese Korean: Ethnonationalism, and yes, pre-Marxist Germanosphere and Anglosphere were on parallel with the Japanese and Korean.
Q: Why is Western civilization the only one worthy of leading humanity?
I understand the question, but it is framed incorrectly. Let’s try to reframe it.
If we mean lead as rule or govern, that’s clearly false. It’s clearly false because the indo Europeans disappeared whenever they tried to rule other peoples, rather than decimate and integrate, or exterminate and replace them. The reason being that the cost to Indo Europeans (“Aryans”) of transforming large populations such was tried by the Hittites in anatolia (1600bc), the indo-iranics in India (1500bc), the iranic-Persians in the middle east (~1500bc), all resulted in their eventual reverse-conquest by the majority peoples. The Indian subcontinent (the Indus valley civilization and the Indian subcontinent) and the eastern middle east (Iran, the South-Caucuses, and eastern Anatolia), and especially Mesopotamia, were developed civilizations with long religious histories and large populations. We saw the same consequences for the Spanish in South America, and we are seeing the same problem with the south American recolonization and repopulation of North America – now 20% of our population, and within a few generations half of it.
Whereas the western Indo-Europeans (European Aryans) did not enter more mature territories with dense populations evolved from river-irrigation systems separated by arid ‘seas’ of near-desert. Instead, the early european farmers had migrated from Anatolia, across the Mediterranean, up the Atlantic coast, created the monolith civilization, and then moved eastward again reaching today’s Poland, producing a set of relatively sedentary low density, farms. And when the new West Indo-Europeans (Aryans) arrived, they appear to have killed most of the men, kept the women, animals, land, and tools, then bred with the women at a ratio of something on the order of 17 women to one man – thereby largely replaced the population. In the island of Britain nearly completely replacing the population. Note the parallel with the european conquest of the Americas. These Aryan conquerors spread westward in horizontal bands, founding the Italic, Celtic, Germanic, North Germanic (Scandinavian), Baltic, and Slavic Peoples. Note the parallel with the cultural bands across North America that still reflect the origins of the British, Scotts-Irish, Germans, and French who settled there. Or the (unfortunate) change in New England by the massive immigration of catholic Italians and Irish, and finally Eastern European Jews.
Instead of lead as in rule, if we mean are Europeans the only ones worthing of providing mankind with leadership by which we mean discover opportunities other civilizations can benefit from, then only western civilization has led, and can lead, humanity into transcendence over the limitations of the physical, natural and evolutionary laws, and into a future where we are not under constant threat of extinction by human, as well as natural, geological, solar, and galactic forces that are all but hostile to life.
If we instead or also mean “lead” as in preventing harm to humanity by revolutionary ideas, ideologies, philosophies, religions, states, and peoples, then that is also possibly true – it’s just profoundly costly and risky, as we have found in the past century and a half.
A better framing then, is that western civilization’s primary value to mankind is our rapidity of adaptation, innovation, and evolution, because Europeans and only Europeans and perhaps east Asians, are willing to pay the high cost of rapid adaptation, innovation, and evolution, and that is in part because we are the only people to have institutions that both facilitate that rapidity in the middle and upper classes who are stressed by creating that continuous change, as well as sedate the stresses of that rapid adaptation in the lower middle and lower classes who are stressed by that continuous change.
A worse framing is that, given that all other civilizations failed to pay the high costs of discovery, adaptation to, and application of the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe, and that in the absence of western civilization humanity might have, and still might, have failed to pass The Great Filter. So one position is to say Europeans are more useful to mankind than the rest, and the other is to say we are the only use to mankind. And this utility is more obvious once we study the geological record, and grasp that man evolved rather quickly due to a very brief, natural, geological, solar, and galactic time period, and that we do not have an endless amount of time to develop mastery of our future – if we are to have one.
So the question is why? Why are europeans uniquely suited to lead by example, and defend ourselves, mankind, and the future.
THE ANSWER:
“We Calculate The Continuous Possibility of the Future”. Because we Pay the Costs Other Civilizations Can’t Pay or Even Imagine Paying: Truth Regardless of Cost, Duty Regardless of Cost, Commons Regardless of Cost, Adaptation Regardless of Cost, Evolution Regardless of Cost, where The Only Solution to internal Conflict is a Superior Solution.
THE EXPLANATION
For historical reasons that cannot be duplicated, Europeans uniquely organized the entire society as a militia (voluntary) army, protecting large herds and territories, conducting entrepreneurial (voluntary) maneuver warfare, using horse, bronze, and wheel. The demands of this social organization caused Europeans to develop institutions differently from other civilizations. As such Europeans developed the institutions of self-determination (individual sovereignty), the militia (army), and rule of law by tort law (property) before the institutions of either religion or state.
The combination of technical epistemology(metallurgy, horse domestication, chariot) and military epistemology (unforgiving), military ‘reporting’ (just the facts, regardless of cost to the status hierarchy), and testimony before peers using this form of military reporting (empirical testimony), created the european cognitive framework, language, norms, traditions, and institutions, dependent upon testimony, oath, and reciprocity: realism (material existence), naturalism (causes), and operationalism (action).
Their military success created a tradition of heroism (for the common good), converted them from agrarian mythology to, the primacy of man, the self-determination of man, and the ability of man to compete with if not defeat the gods (archetypes).
Their law of individual self-determination, individual sovereignty, left the only means of action possible as reciprocity, including reciprocity in speech, left only markets (voluntary associations) for association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons (government), polities, alliances, and war. Or conversely, their universal militia, of relatively equal professional warriors financed by families and clans, left no alternative other than rule of law of tort (property) as the means of self-organization (political order). As such General, King and Judge are functional synonyms.
They then conquered and ruled agrarian peoples (from the Anatolian expansion) and domesticated (whether they killed, ruled, enfranchised, enserfed, or enslaved) man for profit the way that they had domesticated themselves, cattle, and horses.
With this metaphysics of naturalism, operationalism, the primacy of man, of discovery rather than regularity or cyclicality, of continuous adversarialism (competition) in all walks of life, demonstrating one’s excellence (heroism), Europeans converted the entire civilization into the continuous calculation by trial and error of evolution of man at the fastest pace possible.
So Europeans have been fastest (if fragile) even if not first. This is the secret to european genetic, cognitive, cultural, institutional, and military superiority: the application of maneuver to all walks of life, creating rapid innovation and adaptation as the group’s evolutionary strategy. It’s not a secret why Europeans use the OODA loop in war – it’s what we have always used in every aspect of life.
While other civilizations sought to avoid adapting to physical, natural, and evolutionary laws. Europeans discovered, adapted to, and applied the laws of the universe: the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws. Over 98% of discoveries were made by Europeans for these reasons. And in just a few hundred years prior to the bronze age collapse; in just a few centuries before the Semitic Dark Ages of Ignorance (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam) sought to reverse those advances. But once Aristotle and literacy were restored to Europe, Europeans created the revolutions we call empirical, literacy, agrarian, commercial, financial, scientific, technological and biological, in just a few centuries in the modern world.
But just as the Jews invented Christianity in the ancient world, the Jews invented Marxism, socialism, postmodernism, and feminism and sought to reverse those modern advances by the false promise of freedom from physical scarcity (marxism, communism, socialism), reciprocity (positive law, social democracy), evolution (feminism, market eugenics, regression to the mean). Just as they had used the false promise of life after death in the ancient world for the same reasons: to undermine and reverse european (and Persia, and Chinese, and Indian) innovations.
Europe was able to recover from the dark ages because while ‘intellectual’ (clerical) thought had abandoned european tradition and adopted Semitic supernaturalism, the military aristocracy, the law, and to some degree the majority of people outside the urban centers, retained european (west indo european) traditions. So when Aristotle was restored, our intellectual and legal and technological traditions were re-harmonized. And we are still in the process of re-harmonizing religion (if that will ever be possible I am uncertain.).
However, the postwar jewish program to undermine western civlization, by repeating bolshevism here, by repeating christianity in the ancient world, and be repeating judiasm’s hostility to empires in the egyptian and mesopotamian eras, has been successful in this age for the same reasons it was successful in those previous two ages: because there are large numbers of peole readily willing to fall for the false promise of freedom from physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and the high costs of doing so, by claiming thaat ruling empires oppress them rather than defend mankind against those who destroy civlization from wihin by hyperreproduction, hyperconsumption, and the consumption of all surpluses so that proceeds cannot be directed to the production of capitalizing commns that produce returns for all over generations.
TERRIFYING LESSONS
There are terrifying lessons here:
Only Europeans managed to develop law and rule of law of reciprocity in demonstrated interests, as their first institution, preventing ‘authority’, that produces stagnation.
Only Europeans managed to institutionalize military reporting, court testimony, and church ‘confession’ as ‘truth before face regardless of cost’, and that’s why only Europeans had (until 1960) a high trust truth first civilization. (the Japanese and Koreans are close).
Only Europeans managed to develop and maintain a military (militia, army) of everyone, under entrepreneurial warfare, so that status was available to anyone who demonstrated investment in the community – causing competition for enfranchisement by demonstrated investment (at risk) in the community.
Only Europeans managed to develop evolutionary order using Adversarialsim (demonstrated competitive advantage), realism( Realism, Naturalism, Operationalism, Testimonialism), Natural Law (rule of law by test of reciprocity) and markets in everything, and a non-static, no- regressive worldview (metaphysics).
Only Europeans and East Asians managed to institutionalize agrarian eugenics (suppression of underclass reproduction), and the resulting expansion of the genetic-middle class. This combination of law first (Europe) and state first (china) military orders, in homogenous polities, or at least, polities that were ethnically close enough to integrate, and the suppression of reproduction are necessary to reduce the drag on civilization by the underclasses.
In this sense – which again is terrifying – all other civilizations failed. All other civilizations sought to escape physical natural and evolutionary laws. All others either disappeared. Or declined. Or stagnated. Worse, the most effective political system in the world – Islam is antithetical to human progress. It destroyed the genetics, knowledge, arts, institutions, traditions, and cultures – everything- in five great civilizations. As first the Arabs peaked and failed, then the Mongols, then the Turks. The Indians are interesting but they developed healthy religion, weak states, and weak law. In other words. It is extremely easy for life to fail to pass thru the great filter. And at present, the current threat is that the eugenicists were right.
We see the inability to adopt european ‘sensemaking’ across the world. We see it in programmers, in scientists, in authors, in every civilization – outside of Europeans, academic works are imitations of academic work. We see it in Einstein and Bohr vs Hilbert and Brouwer. We see it everywhere. We see it in Jewish jurists and anglo jurists. We see it in Jewish economists and anglo economists.
What is that european sense-making: the reduction of answers to all questions to material first causes under realism, naturalism, operationalism, and reciprocity in display word and deed – and not to desirability. Europeans solve for true, then try to create desirable circumstances based upon that truth. In other words, europeans pay all costs.
LEAD BY EXAMPLE, OR LEAD BY EXAMPLE AND DEFENSE, OR LEAD BY RULE, EXAMPLE, AND DEFENSE?
So we can choose: To disappear. To defend ourselves rather than lead. To lead oursleves rather than others. To lead ourselves, and others by example. To lead ourselves and ‘sell our services of rule’ to others, whle maintaining home territories. To lead by example while maintaining defense of mankind. Or lead by rule, example, and defense of mankind. Or lead by extermination of resistance in mankind. And the question is which of those choices is possible given the costs involved, our resouces, and our numbers? There are three choices that are not suicidal, and we can achieve, and that we can achieve without disappearing into the peole ruled: To lead ourselves, insulate ourselves, and not lead others; or to lead our elves, and others by example; or to lead by the gradual extermination of resistance in mankind.
So it’s not that Europeans must ‘lead’ it’s more that Europeans must remain and compete since all other civilizations are adopting our technology but are in the process of regressing to pre-European colonial organization – by whatever institutions that they had before.
Their weakness, which is why the Hittites, Spartans, and Romans are lost to us, is that domestication of the population worked exclusively in from their own numbers, and achieved scale only northern Europe, because the numbers of the aristocracy do not scale. As such the only solution is to enfranchise the middle, and eliminate, enslave, enserf, or religiously domesticate (Christianity) the peasantry.
So Greece overextended into territories with vast underclasses (the middle east), Rome repeated the mistake. The Europeans decimated the Americas temporarily limiting the problem. But the postwar Jewish program to undermine western civilization from within by marxism, neo-marxism, postmodernism, feminism, human difference denialism, and saturation of the population with self-hatred of their history was successful – if only because immigration and the defection of single european women was enough to end intergenerational transmission of those traditions of western civilization. (just as the Jewish Christians had done to Rome.)
COMPETING VISIONS
Europeans: Europeans move fast, and like Rome seek to ‘mature’ ruled (colonized) people into market participants.
China: China moves slowly and seeks to genetically culturally and institutionally transform genetic near neighbors into pseudo-Han. The Han ruling peoples have been exceptionally successful. Second only to Islam. With beneficial rather than Islam’s catastrophic consequences. China’s problem is limited to face-before-truth, failure to develop rule of law, the corruption that results, and Chinese disregard for human life, as well as irresponsibility for others and commons that results. Chinese developed the state and bureaucracy as their first institution. So Confucius directed all Chinese to focus on the family and harmony and Sun Tzu to “delay and deceive” and the Chinese have formalized those three strategies – and they understand they are using them. They have zero tolerance for ‘internal conflict or competition’, zero tolerance for ‘un-Chinese’, and are just as racist as Indians and Jews. This is the optimum strategy for expansion over time at the cost of innovation.
Russians: The Russians have tried to copy the Chinese strategy, albeit defensively, first by reversal of the Mongol conquest Russia, then through the Russian expansion, then through the soviet expansion, and now through the Russian re-expansion (Belarus, Ukraine, and maybe more).
Judaism/Islam: Islam raids until collapse, then colonizes from the bottom up using religion. Judaism undermines from the top down. Christianity (oddly enough) prepares people for market society (treating all others as customers, with exhaustive forgiveness).
Judaism: The Jews seek to undermine host people’s group cohesion under the auspices of making the world safe for jews – but the result is making the world safe for Islam. They seek to destroy european martial tradition, masculinity, meritocracy, capitalization of commons, truthful reciprocal speech, dependent upon realism and naturalism, and limited to physical (scarcity), natural (reciprocity), and evolutionary (regression to the mean) laws.
India: India will continue to pursue ethnonationalism in order to prevent further increase in the cancer of islam.
Japanese Korean: Ethnonationalism, and yes, pre-Marxist Germanosphere and Anglosphere were on parallel with the Japanese and Korean.
315,000 years ago: approximate date of appearance of Homo sapiens (Jebel Irhoud, Morocco).
270,000 years ago: age of Y-DNA haplogroup A00 (“Y-chromosomal Adam”).
250,000 years ago: first appearance of Homo neanderthalensis (Saccopastore skulls).
250,000–200,000 years ago: modern human presence in West Asia (Misliya cave).
230,000–150,000 years ago: age of mt-DNA haplogroup L (“Mitochondrial Eve”).
210,000 years ago: modern human presence in southeast Europe (Apidima, Greece).[1]
195,000 years ago: Omo remains (Ethiopia).[2]
170,000 years ago: humans are wearing clothing by this date.[3]
160,000 years ago: Homo sapiens idaltu.
150,000 years ago: Peopling of Africa: Khoisanid separation, age of mtDNA haplogroup L0.
125,000 years ago: peak of the Eemian interglacial period.
120,000–90,000 years ago: Abbassia Pluvial in North Africa—the Sahara desert region is wet and fertile.
120,000–75,000 years ago: Khoisanid back-migration from Southern Africa to East Africa.[4]
100,000 years ago: Earliest structures in the world (sandstone blocks set in a semi-circle with an oval foundation) built in Egypt close to Wadi Halfa near the modern border with Sudan.[5]
82,000 years ago: small perforated seashell beads from Taforalt in Morocco are the earliest evidence of personal adornment found anywhere in the world.[6]
80,000–70,000 years ago: Recent African origin: separation of sub-Saharan Africans and non-Africans.
75,000 years ago: Toba Volcano supereruption that may have contributed to human populations being lowered to about 15,000 people.[7]
70,000 years ago: earliest example of abstract art or symbolic art from Blombos Cave, South Africa—stones engraved with grid or cross-hatch patterns.[8]
UPPER PALEOLITHIC
“Epipaleolithic” or “Mesolithic” are terms for a transitional period between the Last Glacial Maximum and the Neolithic Revolution in Old World (Eurasian) cultures.
67,000–40,000 years ago: Neanderthal admixture to Eurasians.
50,000 years ago: earliest sewing needle found. Made and used by Denisovans.[9]
50,000–30,000 years ago: Mousterian Pluvial in North Africa. The Sahara desert region is wet and fertile. Later Stone Age begins in Africa.
45,000–43,000 years ago: European early modern humans.[10]
45,000–40,000 years ago: Châtelperronian cultures in France.[11]
42,000 years ago: Paleolithic flutes in Germany.[12]
42,000 years ago: earliest evidence of advanced deep sea fishing technology at the Jerimalai cave site in East Timor—demonstrates high-level maritime skills and by implication the technology needed to make ocean crossings to reach Australia and other islands, as they were catching and consuming large numbers of big deep sea fish such as tuna.[13][14]
41,000 years ago: Denisova hominin lives in the Altai Mountains.
40,000 years ago: extinction of Homo neanderthalensis.[11]
40,000 years ago: Aurignacian culture begins in Europe.[15]
40,000 years ago: oldest known figurative art the zoomorphic Löwenmensch figurine.[16]
Bradshaw rock paintings found in the north-west Kimberley region of Western Australia
40,000–30,000 years ago: First human settlements formed by Aboriginal Australians in several areas which are today the cities of Sydney,[17][18] Perth[19] and Melbourne.[20]
40,000–20,000 years ago: oldest known ritual cremation, the Mungo Lady, in Lake Mungo, Australia.
35,000 years ago: oldest known figurative art of a human figure as opposed to a zoomorphic figure (Venus of Hohle Fels).
33,000 years ago: oldest known domesticated dog skulls show they existed in both Europe and Siberia by this time.[21][22]
31,000–16,000 years ago: Last Glacial Maximum (peak at 26,500 years ago).
30,000 years ago: rock paintings tradition begins in Bhimbetka rock shelters in India, which presently as a collection is the densest known concentration of rock art. In an area about 10 km2, there are about 800 rock shelters of which 500 contain paintings.[23]
29,000 years ago: The earliest ovens found.
28,500 years ago: New Guinea is populated by colonists from Asia or Australia.[24]
28,000 years ago: oldest known twisted rope.
28,000–24,000 years ago: oldest known pottery—used to make figurines rather than cooking or storage vessels (Venus of Dolní Věstonice).
28,000–20,000 years ago: Gravettian period in Europe. Harpoons and saws invented.
26,000 years ago: people around the world use fibers to make baby carriers, clothes, bags, baskets, and nets.
25,000 years ago: a hamlet consisting of huts built of rocks and of mammoth bones is founded in what is now Dolní Věstonice in Moravia in the Czech Republic. This is the oldest human permanent settlement that has yet been found by archaeologists.[25]
24,000 years ago: Evidence suggests humans living in Alaska and Yukon North America.[26]
21,000 years ago: artifacts suggest early human activity occurred in Canberra, the capital city of Australia.[27]
20,000 years ago: Kebaran culture in the Levant: beginning of the Epipalaeolithic in the Levant
20,000 years ago: oldest pottery storage or cooking vessels from China.
20,000 years ago: theorized earliest date of development of traditional Inuit skin clothing[28]
20,000–10,000 years ago: Khoisanid expansion to Central Africa.[4]
20,000–19,000 years ago: earliest pottery use, in Xianren Cave, China.
18,000–12,000 years ago: Though estimations vary widely, it is believed by scholars that Afro-Asiatic was spoken as a single language around this time period.[29]
16,000–14,000 years ago: Minatogawa Man (Proto-Mongoloid phenotype) in Okinawa, Japan
16,000–13,000 years ago: first human migration into North America.
16,000–11,000 years ago: Caucasian Hunter-Gatherer expansion to Europe.
16,000 years ago: Wisent (European bison) sculpted in clay deep inside the cave now known as Le Tuc d’Audoubert in the French Pyrenees near what is now the border of Spain.[30]
15,000–14,700 years ago (13,000 BC to 12,700 BC): Earliest supposed date for the domestication of the pig.
14,800 years ago: The Humid Period begins in North Africa. The region that would later become the Sahara is wet and fertile, and the aquifers are full.[31]
14,500–11,500: Red Deer Cave people in China, possible late survival of archaic or archaic-modern hybrid humans.
14,000–12,000 years ago: Oldest evidence for prehistoric warfare (Jebel Sahaba massacre, Natufian culture).
13,000–10,000 years ago: Late Glacial Maximum, end of the Last glacial period, climate warms, glaciers recede.
13,000 years ago: A major water outbreak occurs on Lake Agassiz, which at the time could have been the size of the current Black Sea and the largest lake on Earth. Much of the lake is drained in the Arctic Ocean through the Mackenzie River.
13,000–11,000 years ago: Earliest dates suggested for the domestication of the sheep.
12,900–11,700 years ago: the Younger Dryas was a period of sudden cooling and return to glacial conditions.
12,000 years ago: Jericho has evidence of settlement dating back to 10,000 BC. Jericho was a popular camping ground for Natufian hunter-gatherer groups, who left a scattering of crescent microlith tools behind them.[32]
12,000 years ago: Earliest dates suggested for the domestication of the goat.
HOLOCENE
The terms “Neolithic” and “Bronze Age” are culture-specific and are mostly limited to cultures of the Old World. Many populations of the New World remain in the Mesolithic cultural stage until European contact in the modern period.
11,600 years ago (9,600 BC): An abrupt period of global warming accelerates the glacial retreat; taken as the beginning of the Holocene geological epoch.
11,200–11,000 years ago: Meltwater pulse 1B, a sudden rise of sea level by 7.5 m within about 160 years.
11,000 years ago (9,000 BC): Earliest date recorded for construction of temenoi ceremonial structures at Göbekli Tepe in southern Turkey, as possibly the oldest surviving proto-religious site on Earth.[33]
11,000 years ago (9,000 BC): Emergence of Jericho, which is now one of the oldest continuously inhabited cities in the world. Giant short-faced bears and giant ground sloths go extinct. Equidae goes extinct in North America.
10,500 years ago (8,500 BC): Earliest supposed date for the domestication of cattle.
10,000 years ago (8,000 BC): The Quaternary extinction event, which has been ongoing since the mid-Pleistocene, concludes. Many of the ice age megafauna go extinct, including the megatherium, woolly rhinoceros, Irish elk, cave bear, cave lion, and the last of the sabre-toothed cats. The mammoth goes extinct in Eurasia and North America, but is preserved in small island populations until ~1650 BC.
10,800–9,000 years ago: Byblos appears to have been settled during the PPNB period, approximately 8800 to 7000 BC. Neolithic remains of some buildings can be observed at the site.[34][35]
10,000–8,000 years ago (8000 BC to 6000 BC): The post-glacial sea level rise decelerates, slowing the submersion of landmasses that had taken place over the previous 10,000 years.
10,000–9,000 years ago (8000 BC to 7000 BC): In northern Mesopotamia, now northern Iraq, cultivation of barley and wheat begins. At first they are used for beer, gruel, and soup, eventually for bread.[36] In early agriculture at this time, the planting stick is used, but it is replaced by a primitive plow in subsequent centuries.[37] Around this time, a round stone tower, now preserved to about 8.5 meters high and 8.5 meters in diameter is built in Jericho.[38]
10,000–5,000 years ago (8,000–3,000 BC) Identical ancestors point: sometime in this period lived the latest subgroup of human population consisting of those that were all common ancestors of all present day humans, the rest having no present day descendants.[39]
9,500–5,500 years ago: Neolithic Subpluvial in North Africa. The Sahara desert region supports a savanna-like environment. Lake Chad is larger than the current Caspian Sea. An African culture develops across the current Sahel region.
9,500 years ago (7500 BC): Çatalhöyük urban settlement founded in Anatolia. Earliest supposed date for the domestication of the cat.
9,200 years ago: First human settlement in Amman, Jordan; ‘Ain Ghazal Neolithic settlement was built spanning over an area of 15 hectares.[40]
9,000 years ago (7000 BC): Jiahu culture began in China.
9,000 years ago: large first fish fermentation in southern Sweden.[41]
8,200–8,000 years ago: 8.2 kiloyear event: a sudden decrease of global temperatures, probably caused by the final collapse of the Laurentide Ice Sheet, which leads to drier conditions in East Africa and Mesopotamia.
8,200–7,600 years ago (6200–5600 BC): sudden rise in sea level (Meltwater pulse 1C) by 6.5 m in less than 140 years; this concludes the early Holocene sea level rise and sea level remains largely stable throughout the Neolithic.[42]
8,000–5,000 years ago: (6000 BC–3000 BC) development of proto-writing in China, Southeast Europe (Vinca symbols) and West Asia (proto-literate cuneiform).
8,000 years ago: Evidence of habitation at the current site of Aleppo dates to about c. 8,000 years ago, although excavations at Tell Qaramel, 25 kilometers north of the city show the area was inhabited about 13,000 years ago,[43] Carbon-14 dating at Tell Ramad, on the outskirts of Damascus, suggests that the site may have been occupied since the second half of the seventh millennium BC, possibly around 6300 BC.[44] However, evidence of settlement in the wider Barada basin dating back to 9000 BC exists.[45]
7,500 years ago (5500 BC): Copper smelting in evidence in Pločnik and other locations.
7,200–6,000 years ago: 5200–4000 BC:Għar Dalam phase on Malta. First farming settlements on the island.[46][47]
6300 or 6350 years ago: Akahoya eruption creates the Kikai Caldera and ends the earliest homogeneous Jomon culture in Japan. When the Jomon culture recovers, it shows regional differences.[48][verification needed]
6,100–5,800 years ago: 4100–3800 BC: Żebbuġ phase. Malta.
6,070–6,000 years ago (4050–4000 BC): Trypillian build in Nebelivka (Ukraine) settlement which reached 15,000–18,000 inhabitants.[49][50]
6,500 years ago: The oldest known gold hoard deposited at Varna Necropolis, Bulgaria.
6,000 years ago (4000 BC): Civilizations develop in the Mesopotamia/Fertile Crescent region (around the location of modern-day Iraq). Earliest supposed dates for the domestication of the horse and for the domestication of the chicken, invention of the potter’s wheel.
4TH MILLENNIUM BC
5,800 years ago: (3840 to 3800 BC): The Post Track and Sweet Track causeways are constructed in the Somerset Levels.
5,800 years ago (3800 BC): Trypillian build in Talianki (Ukraine) settlement which reached 15,600–21,000 inhabitants.[51]
5,800–5,600 years ago: (3800–3600 BC): Mġarr phase A short transitional period in Malta’s prehistory. It is characterized by pottery consisting of mainly curved lines.
5,700 years ago (3800 to 3600 BC): mass graves at Tell Brak in Syria.
5,700 years ago (3700 BC): Trypillian build in Maidanets (Ukraine) settlement which reached 12,000–46,000 inhabitants,[52] and built 3-storey building.[53]
5,700 years ago: (3700 to 3600 BC): Minoan culture begins on Crete.
5,600–5,200 years ago (3600–3200 BC): Ġgantija phase on Malta. Characterized by a change in the way the prehistoric inhabitants of Malta lived.
5,500 years ago: (3600 to 3500 BC): Uruk period in Sumer. First evidence of mummification in Egypt.
5,500: oldest known depiction of a wheeled vehicle (Bronocice pot, Funnelbeaker culture)
5,500 years ago: Earliest conjectured date for the still-undeciphered Indus script.
5,500 years ago: End of the African humid period possibly linked to the Piora Oscillation: a rapid and intense aridification event, which probably started the current Sahara Desert dry phase and a population increase in the Nile Valley due to migrations from nearby regions. It is also believed this event contributed to the end of the Ubaid period in Mesopotamia.
5,300 years ago: (3300 BC): Bronze Age begins in the Near East[54] Newgrange is built in Ireland. Ness of Brodgar is built in Orkney[55] Hakra Phase of the Indus Valley Civilisation begins in the Indian subcontinent.
5,300–5,000 years ago (3300–3000 BC): Saflieni phase in Maltese prehistory.
3RD MILLENNIUM BC
5,000 years ago: Settlement of Skara Brae built in Orkney.[56]
4,600 years ago: (2600 BC): Writing is developed in Sumer and Egypt, triggering the beginning of recorded history.
POST-HISTORICAL PREHISTORIES
3,800 years ago (1800 BC): Currently undeciphered Minoan script (Linear A) and Cypro-Minoan script developed on Crete and Cyprus.
3,450 years ago (1450 BC): Mycenean Greece, first deciphered writing in Europe
3,200 years ago (1200 BC): Oracle bone script, first written records in Old Chinese
3,050–2,800 years ago: Alphabetic writing; the Phoenician alphabet spreads around the Mediterranean
2,300 years ago: Maya writing, the only known full writing system developed in the Americas, emerges.
2,260 years ago (260 BC): Earliest deciphered written records in South Asia (Middle Indo-Aryan)
1800s AD: Undeciphered Rongorongo script on Easter Island may mark the latest independent development of writing.
https://researchgate.net/figure/Estimated-standardized-scores-on-criminal-involvement-wave-3-and-4-by-political-ideology_fig1_309845639DRAFT ON TERRORISM AND CRIME BY POLITICAL AFFILIATION
Goal: To demonstrate that the cognitive masculine-feminine dichotomy also appears in criminal, social, political ‘crime’ (terrorism). The female (left) cognitive bias to social warfare and the male (right) cognitive bias to political warfare. This mirrors left (solipsistic) vs right (analytic) cognitive differences
Note 1: Notice that Wikipedia (a) creatively moves the left-wing activism of the 1960’s out of the page so it’s not counted. (b) keeps the KKK data in, (c) only shows graphs and data from 2008 forward so that it doesn’t include the leftwing data. In other words, they keep in the abortion clinic bombings by the religious right, but remove the weather underground bombings by the left.
Note 2: I’ve taken the Islamic terrorist acts out of the list since that’s a different matter.
Note 3: You can’ feel the sea change in ’92 just as I said, when ‘whites’ begin to see the future, and Clinton undermines the military.
Data includes:
Right Wing(6), Anti-Jewish(8), KKK(8) abortion (36), foiled (34) 9
—vs—
Left terrorism (16) political left (74), Foiled (9), and riots by the left (15). Total (114) And endemic criminality of left (67%).
Just what you would predict:
(a) Right Political Violence (Sporadic) vs Left Social Violence (endemic).
(b) Postwar left period. Post-1990 Right Period. With Islam taking all the attention from the Right.
LEFT: June 1940: Two dynamite bombs were discovered outside of the Philadelphia Convention Hall during the Republican National Convention. A total of seven bombs were discovered in the greater Philadelphia area during this period.[217]
LEFT: November 1, 1950: Assassination attempt on President Harry S. Truman by members of the Puerto Rican Nationalist Party at the Blair House in Washington, D.C.
LEFT: 1965 The Monumental Plot – New York Police thwart an attempt to dynamite the Statue of Liberty, Liberty Bell, and the Washington Monument by three members of the pro-Castro Black Liberation Front and a Quebec Separatist.[218]
LEFT: March 6, 1970: Three members of the Weather Underground are killed when their “bomb factory” located in New York’s Greenwich Village accidentally explodes. WUO members Theodore Gold, Diana Oughton, and Terry Robbins die in this accident. The bomb was intended to be planted at a non-commissioned officer’s dance at Fort Dix, New Jersey. The bomb was packed with nails to inflict maximum casualties upon detonation. See Greenwich Village townhouse explosion.
April 1971: Pipe bombs found at the embassies of Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos in Washington, D.C.[219]
LEFT JDL: 1972: Two Jewish Defense League members were arrested and charged with bomb possession and burglary in a conspiracy to blow up the Long Island residence of the Soviet mission to the United Nations
LEFT: September 22, 1975: Sarah Jane Moore tries to assassinate President Gerald Ford outside of the St. Francis Hotel in San Francisco. The attempt fails when a bystander grabs her arm and deflects the shot. Moore has stated the motive was to create chaos to bring “the winds of change” because the government had declared war on the left wing.[222][223][224]
THE RIGHT REACTIONARY PERIOD
RIGHT: August 1994: Two far-right extremists, Douglas Baker & Leroy Wheeler, both members of the Minnesota Patriots Council, are arrested for making ricin, a deadly toxin. The two will later be convicted of attempting to poison federal agents.[227]
RIGHT: March 1995: Charles Ray Polk is arrested while attempting to buy plastic explosives and machine guns in order to assassinate four police officers and a female judge, and to bomb the IRS offices in Tyler, Texas.[228]
R-RIGHT: November 9, 1995: Willie Ray Lampley, a self-proclaimed Prophet, along with his wife Cecilia and a family friend John Dare Baird, were arrested for a plot to bomb numerous targets, including the Southern Poverty Law Center in Montgomery, Alabama, the Anti-Defamation League offices in Dallas and Houston, Texas, as well as a number of gay bars & abortion clinics.[229]
RIGHT December 1995: Tax protesters Joseph Martin Bailie and Ellis Edward Hurst attempt to blow up the Internal Revenue Service building in Reno, Nevada with a 100-pound ANFO bomb.[230]
RIGHT: April 1996: Anti-government activist & survivalist Ray Hamblin is arrested after authorities find 460 pounds of the high explosive Tovex, 746 pounds of ANFO blasting agent, and 15 homemade hand grenades on his property in Hood River, Oregon during an investigation into a series of explosions in his storage sheds.[231]
RIGHT July 1996: Twelve members of an Arizona militia group called the Viper Team are arrested on federal conspiracy, weapons and explosive charges after planning to bomb a number of Federal office buildings, including one that houses the office of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms and the FBI.[232]
RIGHT: July 1996: Washington State Militia leader John Pitner and seven others are arrested on weapons and explosives charges in connection with a plot to build pipe bombs for a confrontation with the federal government. Pitner and four others will be convicted on weapons charges, while conspiracy charges against all eight will end in a mistrial.[233] Pitner will later be retried on that charge, convicted and sentenced to four years in prison.[234]
RIGHT: October 1996: Seven members of the Mountaineer Militia are arrested in a plot to blow up the FBI’s national Criminal Justice Information Services Division in Clarksburg, West Virginia. In 1998, leader Floyd “Ray” Looker, will be sentenced to 18 years in prison.[235]
RRIGHT: March 17, 1997: anti-abortion extremist Peter Howard puts 13 gas cans and three propane tanks in his truck, and drives it through the door of a California women’s clinic in a failed attempt to fire bomb the clinic.[236]
RRIGHT: September 1999: anti-abortion extremist Clayton Lee Waagner was pulled over by the Pennsylvania State Police, but fled into the woods and evaded capture, leaving behind a stolen car that contained firearms, explosives, fake ID, and a list of abortion clinics. Later in September 1999, while on a self-described “Mission from God”, he took his wife and their nine children on a cross-country road trip headed west in a stolen Winnebago, planning to murder various abortion doctors, beginning with one in Seattle, Washington. However, after crossing into Illinois his vehicle broke down, and Waagner was arrested when Illinois State Police stopped to investigate. Waagner was convicted on charges of interstate transportation of a stolen motor vehicle and for being a convicted felon in possession of firearms. Waagner later escaped and used a cross country crime spree to continue to fund his anti-abortion mission.
RRIGHT: December 5, 2001: anti-abortion extremist Clayton Lee Waagner is arrested in a Kinko’s while he was preparing to fax bomb threats to a mass list of abortion clinics.
LEFT-JDL: December 12, 2001: Jewish Defense League plot by Chairman Irv Rubin and follower Earl Krugel to blow up the King Fahd Mosque in Culver City, California and the office of Lebanese-American Congressman Darrell Issa foiled.
2004 Columbus Shopping Mall bombing plot: A loosely organized group of young men planned to carry out an attack on an unnamed shopping mall.
RRIGHT: September 11, 2006: A man rammed his car into a women’s clinic that he thought was an abortion clinic and set it ablaze in Davenport, Iowa causing $20,000 worth of damage to the building.[237]
RRIGHT: April 25, 2007: A bomb was left in a women’s clinic in Austin, Texas but failed to explode.[238][239]
July 21, 2010: Bryon Williams captured after shootout with California Highway Patrol with guns strapped on his body armor alleged to have confessed that he was on his way to kill workers at the American Civil Liberties Union and follow it up with and attack on Tides Center allegedly was angry with left-wing politics and inspired by conspiracy theories of Glenn Beck and hoped the attack would ignite a revolution.[255]
RIGHT: January 17, 2011: Spokane bombing attempt: A small pipe bomb in a backpack designed to be detonated by remote control and spread shrapnel in a specific direction was discovered during a Martin Luther King Day parade in Spokane, Washington. White supremacist Kevin Harpham is convicted and sentenced to 32 years in federal prison.[256][257]
RIGHT: April 8, 2013: Letters believed to contain the poison Ricin were sent to President Barack Obama and Mississippi Republican Senator Roger Wicker and a Mississippi Justice official. Tests on the granular substance found in the letters tested positive for “low grade” ricin.
RIGHT: October 22–26, 2018: At least twelve packages containing pipe bombs were mailed within the U.S. Postal Service system to several prominent critics of U.S. President Donald Trump, including various Democratic Party politicians (Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Eric Holder, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Maxine Waters, Cory Booker), actor Robert De Niro, billionaire investor George Soros, former CIA Director John O. Brennan, and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper.
RIGHT: January 1940: The FBI shuts down the Christian Front after discovering that its members were arming themselves for a plot to “murder Jews, communists, and ‘a dozen Congressmen’” and establishing a government modeled after Nazi Germany.[263][264]
RIGHT: November 9, 1995: Oklahoma Constitutional Militia members arrested while in the planning stages for bombings of Southern Poverty Law Center, gay bars and abortion clinics.[265][266]
January 1, 1996: Members of the Viper Team militia are arrested after they caught surveying government buildings in Arizona.[265]
RIGHT: November 11, 1996: Seven members of the Mountaineer Militia are arrested in a plot to blow up the FBI fingerprint records center in West Virginia.[265]
RIGHT: July 4, 1997: Members of the splinter militia group the Third Continental Congress are arrested while planning attacks on military bases which they believed were being used to train United Nations troops to attack U.S. citizens.[265]
RIGHT: March 18, 1998: Members of the North American Militia are arrested in plot to bomb Federal Buildings in Michigan, a television station and an interstate highway intersection.[265]
December 5, 1999: Members of the San Joaquin Militia are arrested on charges of plotting to bomb critical infrastructure locations in hopes of sparking an insurrection. The leaders of the group pled guilty to charges of plotting to kill a Federal judge.[265]
RIGHT: December 8, 1999: The leader of the Southeastern States Alliance militia group is arrested in plot to bomb energy faculties with the goal of causing power outages in Florida and Georgia.[265]
RIGHT: March 9, 2000: The former leader of the Texas Militia is arrested in a plot to attack the Federal Building in Houston.[265]
RIGHT: February 8, 2002: Two members of Project 7 are arrested plotting to kill judges and law enforcement officials in order to kick off a revolution.[265]
RIGHT: July 26, 2002 2002 White supremacist terror plot: Two white supremacists were convicted of conspiring to start a race war by bombing landmarks associated with Jews and Blacks.[270]
RIGHT: September 3, 2002: An Idaho Mountain Militia Boys plot to kill a judge and a police officer and break a friend out of jail is uncovered.[265]
RIGHT: April 24, 2003: William Krar is charged for his part in the Tyler poison gas plot, a white supremacist related plan. A sodium cyanide bomb was seized with at least 100 other bombs, bomb components, machine guns, and 500,000 rounds of ammunition. He faces up to 10 years in prison.[271][272]
RIGHT: November 29, 2006: Demetrius Van Crocker a white supremacist from rural Tennessee was sentenced to 30 years in prison for attempting to acquire Sarin nerve gas and C-4 explosives that he planned to use to destroy government buildings.[275]
RIGHT: May 1, 2007: Five members of a self-styled Birmingham, Alabama area anti-immigration militia were arrested for planning a machine gun attack on Mexicans.[278]
RIGHT: October 27, 2008: Federal agents claim to thwarted a plot by two white power skinheads to target an African American High School and kill 88 blacks and decapitate 14 more (the numbers 88 and 14 are symbolic to white supremacists) and although expecting to fail try to assassinate Barack Obama.[288][289]
RIGHT: October–November 2011: Georgia terrorist plot Four elderly men from a Georgia militia arrested for plotting to buy ricin in preparation for an attack they claimed would “save the Constitution”. They allegedly discussed blowing up IRS and ATF buildings, dispensing ricin from a plane over Atlanta and other cities, and assassinating “un American” politicians. Informant used to break up alleged plot.[330]
LEFT: May 1, 2012: 5 self described anarchists were arrested in an alleged plot to blow up a bridge in Cuyahoga Valley National Park in Brecksville, Ohio. The group was being monitored as part of an F.B.I. undercover operation and had considered other plots previously. One of the suspects expressed a desire to cause financial damage to companies while avoiding casualties.[337][338]
RIGHT: August 27, 2012: Four non-commissioned officers from Fort Stewart in Georgia, along with five other men, were charged in an alleged plot to poison an apple orchard and blow up a dam in Washington State, seize control of Fort Stewart, set off explosives in a park in Savannah, Georgia, and assassinate President Barack Obama. The alleged plot was on behalf of the “FEAR” militia for the long term purpose of overthrowing the government.[339][340]
LEFT: 2014: Brandon Orlando Baldwin and Olajuwon Ali Davis allegedly plotted to kill St. Louis County, Missouri Prosecuting Attorney Robert McCulloch and Ferguson, Missouri Police Chief Tom Jackson as well as bomb the Gateway Arch in reaction to the shooting of Michael Brown. The suspects were caught as a result of an undercover operation.[351]
RIGHT: April 10, 2015: the FBI arrested 63-year old Robert Rankin Doggart, of Signal Mountain, Tennessee, who ran as a congressional candidate in 2014. He was wiretapped explaining plans to raise a militia to burn down a mosque, school and cafeteria and gun down Muslims in an enclave called Islamberg in New York. He planned to amass M4 carbines, pistols, Molotov cocktails and machetes, saying “We will offer [our] lives as collateral to prove our commitment to our God,” and “We shall be Warriors who inflict horrible numbers of casualties upon the enemies,” and “If it gets down to the machete, we will cut them to shreds.”[357] He has a Ph.D. from a diploma mill and an ordination from an ordination mill.[358] He pled guilty on May 15, 2015.[359]
RIGHT: October 14, 2016: Curtis Wayne Allen, 49; Patrick Eugene Stein, 47; and Gavin Wayne Wright, 49 are arrested in Garden City, Kansas after an eight month long investigation conducted by the FBI finds that the men were plotting to use explosives to kill an estimated 120 persons at an apartment complex inhabited by Somali immigrants. The men claimed allegiance to a far right nationalist group called “The Crusaders”.[367] Stein was sentenced to 30 years, Wright to 26 years, and Allen to 25 years for conspiracy to use a weapon of mass destruction.[368]Updated Aug 31, 2020, 7:04 PM
FIRST DAY OF A LOGIC COURSE (from comments I made on a paper) (Purpose is to illustrate the difference between how P describes logic and how the present academy explains it.)
[A] few suggestions, that give the students context where that context limits the majority of student errors not only in class but throughout life.
1) The sciences consist of the formal sciences we call the Logics, the Physical Sciences, and Social Sciences(psychology, and sociology).
Formal Sciencies (Logics) > Physical Sciences > Human Sciences
2) Most of us are familiar of the logic of positions we call mathematics and its application to measurements; and the logic of operations, we call algorithms, programming, procedures, or the logic of sequential actions in time, and in addition, we use the general term ‘logic’ of the logic of sets applied more broadly language; So within the formal sciences that we call the logics, we use a least the logic of one property in measurement, the logic of more properties in sequences of operations, and the logic of speech using words that are unlimited, in a spectrum of increasing complexity.
One Dimension: math (Positional Logic) > N-Limited Dimensions (Operational Logic) > N-Unlimited Dimensions (Set Logic).
3) These methodologies in formal science are possible because of the human logical facility. The human logical facility consists of neurological tests of the spectrum of relations that are constant, inconstant, contingent, potential, contradictory, and non-sensical relations that are perceivable by the spectrum of physical sensation, intuitionistic auto-association we call perception, and the sequence of thought we call dreaming, daydreaming thinking, reasoning, rationalism (“logic”), calculation (transformation of inputs into outputs), and computation.
Human Faculties ( Physical, Intuitionistic, and Rational) > Human Logical Facility > The Sciences > Formal Sciences > Tests of {constant, inconstant, contingent, potential, contradictory, and non-sensical} relations > Using {hinking, reasoning, rationalism (“logic”), calculation (transformation of inputs into outputs), and computation.}
4) While the human brain operates in massively parallel competition for coherence between past present and future, describing our internal thoughts requires serial communication by signs or speech. When we serially communicate using signs or speech, we depend on rules we call ‘grammars’.
Humans evolved not only the logical facility by massive parallel competition, we evolved a grammar facility to organize and communicate all or part of the experience that results. This grammar vacility and what we call rules of grammar, consists of rules of continuous recursive disambiguation. We use serial language, grammatical rules of continuous recursive disambiguation, to suggest meaning to others, by causing them to continuously recursively predict what we experience (mean). The audience uses those same rules of grammar to predict what the speaker intends to convey. The audience then conveys understanding, and either asks for, or is given, further disambiguation, until both parties satisfy the need (demand) for disambiguity.
In the discipline of logic we refer to this more general term prediction as inference. And the discipline of logic as rules of inference. In this sense, with this understanding, the discipline of logic is either an extension of grammar or grammar is an extension of logic – and until the 20th century truthful speech, grammar, logic, and rhetoric (meaning argument) were taught as a continuum. (And, aside from the intentional removal of adversarialism from the curriculum in order to allow girls to compete, there is very likely a political reason you were not taught grammar, logic, and rhetoric.)
Human Logic Facility (parallel comparison) > Human Grammar Facility (sequential disambiguation) > Grammar(organization) > Logic(tests of consistency) > Rhetoric (argument).
5) Inferences (predictions) are steps in reasoning, beginning with premises and ending with conclusions. We divide inference into the sequence: deduction, induction, and abduction. Deduction is inference that predict logical conclusions from premises known or assumed to be true. Induction is the inference (prediction) from particular premises to a universal conclusion. Abduction is the inference (prediction) to the best explanation. But that spectrum of deduction, induction, and abduction describes only the sufficiency of information we have to work with, as three points on a continuum.
6) In this course, we are largely interested in language and we the logic of sets, with the laws of valid (not false) inference (prediction), under the general label we conventionally refer to as “logic”, using that human faculty of reason we call “rationalism”(limiting our reasoning to rules of logic).
Logical Facility > Grammar(disambiguation) > Sets of Properties > Rules of Inference (Prediction) => “Logic”
7) We apply the logic of sets to language to test the truth, falsehood, or undecidability of propositions. When we say a statement or set of statements is false, they are inconsistent or contradictory. When we say a statement or set of statements is true, we mean the set of properties is internally consistent.
Degree of Decidability: Undecidable > Truth Candidate > False.
When we say a statement is or set of statements is contingent, it is dependent on information external to the statement. And when we say that a statement is undecidable, the properties are insufficient to determine consistency – which means ambiguous.
8) When we say a statement or set of statements is true we mean it satisfies both the demand for disambiguity, and the demand for infallibility in the context – meaning it’s coherent with and consistent and sufficient for infallibility within the broader context.
True: Context > Demand for Infallibility > Coherent, Consistent, and Sufficient
9) The spectrum of truth claims ranges from tautological – meaningless, to ideal – meaning the testimony we would give if we were omniscient; to testifiable – meaning that one has done due diligence against ignorance, error, bias, and deceit; to honest – meaning the promise that one does not deceive, obscure, load, frame, or fictionalize.
True: Tautlogical > Ideal > Real (Testifiable) > Honesty
10) And people frequently make truth claims using a spectrum of paradigms using analogies to experience from the most general to the most specific:
11) Despite the efforts of hundreds if not thousands of great thinkers, the result of the 19th and 20th-century research is that set logic applied to human speech is largely a falsificationary rather than justificationary system of thought. In other words, we tend to prove very little of consequence, but we falsify the infinity of falsehoods by ignorance, error, bias, and deceit. And this is the principle function of study of the logics: to improve our ability to identify ignorance, error, bias, and deceit, and to seek sufficiently unambiguous, sufficiently infallible, sufficiently testifiable knowledge despite the many human failings.
Empistemology: Auto Association( Possibility: Idea ) > Justification (Explanation: Hypothesis) > Falsification (Survival: Theory) > Truth Candidate
12) So this is the context of logic that we will cover in this course, and the primary benefit to you, in your life, will be the advantage of freedom from falsehoods by ignorance, error, bias and deceit.
In my understanding, logic, as it is taught in university as the logic of sets and inference, is as archaic as scriptural interpretation, textual interpretation, and legal interpretation that it evolved from. And that between mathematics and set logic we are better off studying operational logic since it is operational logic that eliminates the limits of set logic.
White (European) Civilization’s Strategy is 3500-5000 years old. But did not develop writing, as is true for all peoples, until the age of mediterranean trade. Like most civilizations european civlization emerged from the bronze age collapse (the first major dark age) ~1200BC (3200 years ago) by moving southward and conquering or rebuilding the pre-collapse territories, and with access to sea trade, and the knowledge transported by sea trade.
Victor Davis Hanson is partly correct when he states that the uniquness of western civilization consists in three properties:
Ratio Empirical Thought
Individualism
Democratic Institutions
Which is true. But it’s insufficient. Because it doesn’t tell you why, or what else is equally or more important.
So let’s walk thru what made european civlizaiton unique.
Founding Conditions
Eastern European hunter-gatherers mixed with a population from a pocket of Caucasus hunter-gatherers who weathered much of the last Ice Age in apparent isolation.
Yamnaya were Europoid, tall, and massively built. Their cephalic index varies depending on the region, with brachycephaly (Broad Skull) being prevalent in its southern and southeastern areas, and dolichocephaly (long skull) being prevalent in its northerneastern area
Pontic Caspian Steppe
Diet of Milk, Yoguhurt, Cheese, and Meat (40% more calories than agrarian life)
Mobile Homes – “Yurts on Wheels”
Horse, Bronze, Wheel – Expensive,
Long Distance, Maneuver Warfare – Capture women and livestock.
Entrepreneurial warfare – Voluntary, raiding (piracy, viking, raiding), still in ireland until very late.
Specializing in Metalworking.
Social adjustment to high mobility. The invention of the political infrastructure to manage larger herds from mobile homes based in the steppes.
Conquest of Europe
Three pockets of Western European hunter-gatherers weathered much of the last Ice Age in apparent isolation in the Iberian peninsula, Italy and Greece, then moved northward and re-populated Europe as the ice retreated. Anatolian Neolithic farmers colonized Europe once again, across the Mediterranean, up the into Iberia and France and into the isles creating the Monolith cultures, then across into central, and northern Europe, and Poland creating the Bell Beaker Cultures.
Eurasian Plain – To Wooded and River’ed Europe, Mostly northern, centered in Ukraine, Poland, Germany
Family and Clan Farms, Cattle, Sheep, Pigs, etc.
The Order of Institutions
There are three methods of influencing, coercing, or exercising power over humans:
Physical and Martial: Force – Defense
Resource Economic: Remuneration – Deprivation
Words Social: Ostracization – Inclusion
From these three Institutions we evolve:
The State and Law of Command (Hard, Fast, Expensive)
The Judiciary and Law of Property (Medium, Medium, Medium)
Religion and Law of Conformity and Exclusion (Soft, Slow, Cheap)
The order in which peoples develop these institutions determines their future, with whatever is first strongest, second less so, and third may or may not evolve at all.
The Middle east developed religion and the state but not law – a monopoly of religion
The Jews developed religion and law but failed at the state
The Chinese developed the state – a monopoly of the state- never developing religion or law.
The Hindus developed a Mythology and Norms – A monopoly of Religion – if you want to call Hinduism a religion.
The Europeans developed law, then state, and religion lagged until xianity.
Because of our experiences with the imposition of Xianity, the persistence of Christian fundamentalism, the 1400 year war against Islam, and continuous difficulty with the Jews, we presume religion is more important than the evidence suggests. China developed the state, Sun Tzu for war, Conflucious for society and the Tao for the self. Europe developed law and market government, Aristotelian Empiricism, Ethics, and Politics, Plato’s Republic for rule, and Stoicism and Epicureanism for the self while religion was largely ritual and sacrifice officiated by the aristocracy as a demonstration of loyalty. Whether Hinduism is a religion or bridge between mythology and philosophy is a difficult question, and while it appears to us in the present that the Indian people eventually succumbed to excess mysticism, just as Buddhism, itself trying to reform Hinduism, later succumbed as well, the Arthashastra (AR-thuh-shah-strah) of Kautilya written in 300bc is a work of law equally empirical compared to any other at the time. More empirical than semitic, more pragmatic than Confucian, less theoretic than european. That we indoctrinate people into fundamentalism in the middle east and west is a habit a tradition, but by the evidence, not a good one. There is more to learn from India and China. There is nothing to learn from the middle east except decline.
Each civilization faced the great transformation into larger scale organizations with different demographics and different dominant exercise of power. In the middle east, with it’s densely populated rivers and irrigation, priests arose first, and the heterogeneous multitude of tribes and large numbers of competitors were later conquered and territory consolidated by kings who sought power for themselves by the priesthood. In India the vast difference between the conquering IE-iranic peoples, the absence of competitors, large territory, the vast number of small farms, and the relatively homogenous dravidian and negrito underclasses favored wisdom literature, and the caste system. In China the relative isolation of the territory, the early and widespread use of rice farming, and irrigation, a military aristocracy dominated near-kin but were controlled by ritualization in exchange for status. In Europe the IE-Europeans killed off most of the farmers, kept and bred with their women, preserving homogeneity until they moved south into the Mediterranean. They retained their militarism even under agrarianism.
So the means of production and its density, the homogeneity or heterogeneity of the population producing it, the first institution to develop, and the means of scaling that institution produced very different civilizations.
But interestingly, the only tradition that produces a market for elites rather than a monpoly of elites is the western tradition of law
Western TriFunctionalism – Creating a Market for Elites
The Hindus created a religion of cast monopoly to protect themselves from dysgenia – although that is not the word they use for it. And in doing so they achieved upward redistribution of reproduction as the jews did in Europe – but at a much larger scale. They could not, however, limit the underclasses. The Chinese created state and bureaucratic monopoly, used it as a competition the way the Semites used scripture, and limited the underclasses by capital punishment, credit constraint, and the natural difficulty of rice farming in close quarters. The Europeans maintained the martial aristocracy, sent their lesser sons to the church nobility, and eventually evolved a commercial elite or bourgeoise, and they suppressed the bottom and pushed down the middle through manorialism – at least above the Hajnal Line (HIGH-nahl), but the upper class was never more than a few hundred thousand people, most of whom were related to the Carolingians in one way or another. The Semites, unfortunately, developed religion first, never developed the state and professional bureaucracy, and structured their entire civilization using religion to resist the aristocracies and their attempts to suppress underclass reproduction, employ reason and science, or even law.
The uniquenss of the western model was that by deveoping the institution of universal militia, and common law of tort first, was that they created markets in everything as well as markets for elites in aristocracy, law, and religion. We still see this today in theology, philosophy, law, and the sciences – which reflects the natural class structure. The chinese were close to europeans with Sun Tzu and the military, Confucius for the Bureaucracy, and Lao Tzu for the common people. The semites again practiced monopoly authoritarian supernaturalism, and conflated wisdm and law, truth and revelation, primacy of man and primacy of submission to a god.
This competition between elites prevented the stagnation that occurs when any given set of elites obtains a monopoly. Why? Because when you do that you have to lie. Really. When you train children, women, and the common folk through religion, conduct trade by the same empiricism in contracts, take measurements and produce construction by math and science, rule and adjudicate law by those same criteria, and practice innovative and adaptive warfare where men may take initiative, you prevent the formation of monopolies.
The Incentives to Produce Commons
European is an expensive strategy
What can I NOT Do to impose costs onothers
What can I do to contribut to commons?
Commons create good for everyone but are unconsumable.
The Glorious Accident
Everyone else failed
Strategy
Fully Militarized Society – An Army
For an army to succeed everyone must do his duty – first before self.
Cowardice: Self before duty to the commons is the only death penalty.
Aristocracy – Ruled by a Class of “Elected” Professional Warriors
Conquer and Domesticate plants, animals, people, and territory and profit from it.
Domesticate man from wild to slave to serf to freeman to citizen to sovereign – man can ascend by merit.
We are Few, So We Must Be Best (Germany still practices this)
“Aristocratic Egalitarianism” – We are Short of Numbers, So Seek Out The Best to Join.
Celebrate Life, Land, Existence, Prosperity, Wealth, Consumption, Sharing the Feast
Early Christianity provided women and underclasses means of ‘tolerating’ Domestication
Later Christianity provided the emerging middle class with civil heroics rather than martial – Chivalry was never practiced in the age of it.
The reason to achieve status from slave to serf to freeman to citizen to sovereign is to achieve self determination: sovereignty.
As such: By Joel Landoe
“The apparent privileges allegedly enjoyed by only one ethnicity (per social cartels, media etc) – Europeans – are due to an inequality of institutions, traditions, norms, paradigms, knowledge, values, resources, and goals [technology] that when applied in combination can be used by any person regardless of age, race, gender, or status for maximum self-actualization and development of good society.”
Scientifically: By Curt Doolittle
Only Europeans, and specifically male, conservative, and libertarian Europeans, paid the high cost, and counterintuitive cost, of discovering, adapting to, and applying the physical(material), biological (evolutionary), social (cooperative), laws of the universe, in thought, word, and deed, across the spectrum: personally, socially, economically, politically, militarily, and strategically (expansion, colonization, conquest).
As such whiteness is a technology. It is a costly technology. It is paid for like all technologies. And the results are acquired at high cost no others are willing to pay.
Evidentiary, warranted, warrantable Truth, reciprocity in display word and deed, competition in the service of others for survival by market adversity, meritocratic outcome in markets for association, cooperation, reproduction, production, common, polities, and most of all eugenic constraint on reproduction by test of meritocratic outcome – all of which are performed regardless of cost – are costs only Europeans evolved to bear.
And even such it’s only possible in the lesser classes by training in Christian exhaustive payment of psychological costs as virtuous contribution to the commons, and worthy of status even without intellectual, economic, political, and military success.
As such only European lower classes were slowly reduced in number, and reduced in cost, providing the counterintuitive excellence of western civilization: our Christian underclass, laboring classes, working classes, and lower-middle classes do the world’s least harm, while middle and upper classes do the world’s most good.
The counter-intuitive explanation for the three great ages of European success vs all other competing civilizations is that Europeans deviate the least from the laws of the universe and pay high costs for doing so but achieve the extraordinary returns for those investments.
So Europeans are not privileged. We merely pay the extraordinary costs that others do not.
Ergo others who come and don’t are thieves.
The Minority Problem Manifest
Whiteness (Europeanism) is a technology, yes, just as damns are technology. However, adoption & maintenance costs vary across human subspecies, & since the gains are incurred largely as a function of time, there is very little incentive for certain subspecies to adopt Europeanism – particularly subspecies known for hyperbolic discounting.
Europeanism as technology does have the advantage of framing failure as a product of choice—‘the technology is there why don’t you use it?’
However, I think europeanism is more appropriately framed as an extended phenotype, just as damns are the product of beaver’s genetic information. It shifts the moral conversation from specifying & allocating blame for the failure to one of unapologetic commitment to ourselves & our mission:
“We have no other choice than to be excellent. You are either coming along, contributing & carrying your own weight, or we will forcibly separate to remove the civilizational, institutional, economic, demographic drag.”
Communication (Military Liability > Contract > Reporting > Testimony)
”The King’s English” rules
Written tradition
Avoid conflict, intimacy
Don’t show emotion
Don’t discuss personal life
Be polite
Protestant Work Ethic (Army > Duty > Commons Before Self.)
Had work is the key to success
Work before play
“If you didn’t meet your goals, you didn’t work hatd enough”
Family Structure
Tbe nuclear family, father, mother, 2.3 children is the ideal social unit
Husband is breadwinner and head of househoid
Wife is homemaker and subordinate to the husband
Children should have own rooms, be independent
Status Power Authority (Empirical Meritocracy > Empirical Respect > Empirical Authority)
Wealth – worth – –
Your iob is who you are
Respect authority
Heavy value on ownetship of goods, space
Time (Duty First > commons before self > military and commercial efficiency,)
Follow rigid time schedules
Time viewed as a commodity
Future Orientation (Duty First > Do no harm by moral hazard > Responsibiity for future)
Plan for future
Delayed gratification
Progress is always best
Tomorrow will be better
History (And Mythology)
Based on Northern European Immtgtants’ experience an the United States
Heavy Focus on the British Empire
Me primacy of Western (Greek. Roman) and JudeoChflstian tradition
Aesthetics
Based on European culture
Steak and potatoes; ‘bland ts best”
Woman’s beauty based on blonde, thin – ”Barbe“
Man’s attractiveness based on economic status. power, Intellect
Religion
Christianity is the Norm
Anything other than Judeo – Christian tradition is foreign
No tolerance for deviation ftom single god concept
Holidays
Based on Christan traditions
Based on white history and male leaders
The Secret of Western Civilization
CALCULATION: MANEUVER, VELOCITY, ADAPTATION, SOVEREIGNTY, RECIPROCITY, TRUTH, DUTY, AND MARKETS
The West – Adaptive Velocity
The secret to western civilization, being a small, relatively poor population on the edge of the bronze age, is that by the choice of voluntary militia, military tactics of maneuver requiring contractualism, and heroic sovereignty (ownership of gains), we necessitated natural law, and markets in everything. And as a consequence the west was not first, but in every era we were fastest. In other words, truth, promise(contract), natural law, and jury allow us to adapt faster than every other known method of human cooperation.
European Strategy is:
Competitive Excellence (Success) by,
… the Continuous Production of Agency;
… through continuous invention, continuous adaptation, and continuous domestication, regardless of costs to the status, competence, dominance hierarchy – whether the self, family, or leadership;
… by the combination of:
Heroism, and;
Truth Regardless of Consequences to the Status, Competence, and Dominance Hierarchy – whether the self, family or leadership and;
Duty Regardless of Consequences to the self and family;
Sovereignty and Reciprocity including reciprocal insurance of sovereignty and reciprocity regardless of costs to the self and family;
… leaving the only possible rules of cooperation as:
The Rule of Law, The Law of Tort (property), the Independent Judiciary, and;
Markets (meritocracy) in every aspect of life: association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons, elites, grammars, group strategy, polities, group and war;
… resulting in:
Seeking and Finding of Pareto Optimums, in all markets;
The suppression of reproduction at the bottom and the upward redistribution of reproduction, defeating regression to the mean;
And the rapid transformation of men into the gods they imagined in the Neolithic, bronze, iron, and steel ages.
WHITE
“White” refers to: (a) descendants of the Indo European conquest of Europe, (b) who speak the indo-european language family, (c) who practice the indo european metaphysical and legal traditions, and (d) during the dark ages, converted from indo european derived religion to its antithesis: the Semitic derived Christian religion. The outlier property is the metaphysical and legal tradition that is what causes european civilizational uniqueness and is the reason for european excellence in the bronze, ancient, and modern worlds – with a thousand years of a superstitious dark age in between. It’s this uniqueness that demarcates ‘whites’ from other peoples more so than any other, and unfortunately, it is the least understood (until now, which is the focus of my work).
WHITENESS “Whiteness” as used pejoratively is a group strategy. It is a group strategy of northern Europeans (protestants). That group strategy is extremely costly. While we may be aware of the high cost of truth before face, the high cost of market meritocracy, and the high cost of high trust norms, it’s unspoken cost is that it is aggressively eugenic. This aggressive eugenics is as much or more important than any other cultural trait. Only the Chinese and the Europeans were able to institutionalize eugenic reproduction via manorialism, which accounts for the elevated intelligence of East Asians and Western Europeans: the underclasses were dramatically reduced through natural cold weather farming, reproductive suppression, and criminal prosecution. The world other than Korea japan and china who are equally the products of eugenic evolution (human self domestication) despies western civlization becuase it is expensive, it is counter-intuitive, and it is antithetical to them – but most importantly – because they cannot compete because they cannot repeat the eugenic processes themselves. Islam is perhaps the ultimate anti-civilization in history and is not a primitive group strategy. It produces decivilization and dysgenia by justifying the avoidance of all adaptive costs. The same is true for the current war by the left against western civlization – they seek to eliminate the payment of eugenic costs.
THE SPECTRUM 1 – Most narrowly: Northern Europeans above the Hajnal Line (North Sea Civ), who were not under catholicism long enough to lose their ancestral legal and traditional habits – especially those who escaped the long term corruption of the church. The north sea group began separating from the rest of the world rapidly and the great divergence of the greeks was repeated in the north sea beginning in 1000 ad (not 1400). 2 – Commonly: Christian European whether Germanic Scandinavian, Baltic, Slavic, or Finnic. (Continental Civ). This includes the three groups of Christianized european people: orthodox(greek), catholic(Latin), and protestant (Germanic) 3 – Less Commonly: Many be extended to include the descendants of early Neolithic farmers of the Balkans, Greece, Southern Italy, Sicily, and Sardinia because they are Christian and in the european territorial and cultural sphere of influence. (European Peninsular Civ) 4 – Uncommonly: May be extended to include the Iranic people of the caucuses: Georgians, Armenians. (European Extant Civ thru the Urals ) 5 – Rarely: May be extended to include the south-central West Eurasians – the Iranic peoples – but generally not. 6 – More rarely: May be extended to the Turkic peoples – but almost certainly not – because they don’t speak an IE language. 7 – Not including outbred peoples of the Indian subcontinent (who are a mixture of negrito hunter-gatherer, middle eastern hunter-gatherer (Dravidian), and Indo european steppe herders. 8 – Not including the Afro Asiatic Languages – Middle eastern Peoples. 9 – Never including African or East Asian Peoples, or Siberian Peoples (Amerindians). 10 – Never including admixture peoples (along the out-of-Africa route from Yemen, to India, to SE Asia, to Australia.
White (European) Civilization’s Strategy is 3500-5000 years old. But did not develop writing, as is true for all peoples, until the age of mediterranean trade. Like most civilizations european civlization emerged from the bronze age collapse (the first major dark age) ~1200BC (3200 years ago) by moving southward and conquering or rebuilding the pre-collapse territories, and with access to sea trade, and the knowledge transported by sea trade.
Victor Davis Hanson is partly correct when he states that the uniquness of western civilization consists in three properties:
Ratio Empirical Thought
Individualism
Democratic Institutions
Which is true. But it’s insufficient. Because it doesn’t tell you why, or what else is equally or more important.
So let’s walk thru what made european civlizaiton unique.
Founding Conditions
Eastern European hunter-gatherers mixed with a population from a pocket of Caucasus hunter-gatherers who weathered much of the last Ice Age in apparent isolation.
Yamnaya were Europoid, tall, and massively built. Their cephalic index varies depending on the region, with brachycephaly (Broad Skull) being prevalent in its southern and southeastern areas, and dolichocephaly (long skull) being prevalent in its northerneastern area
Pontic Caspian Steppe
Diet of Milk, Yoguhurt, Cheese, and Meat (40% more calories than agrarian life)
Mobile Homes – “Yurts on Wheels”
Horse, Bronze, Wheel – Expensive,
Long Distance, Maneuver Warfare – Capture women and livestock.
Entrepreneurial warfare – Voluntary, raiding (piracy, viking, raiding), still in ireland until very late.
Specializing in Metalworking.
Social adjustment to high mobility. The invention of the political infrastructure to manage larger herds from mobile homes based in the steppes.
Conquest of Europe
Three pockets of Western European hunter-gatherers weathered much of the last Ice Age in apparent isolation in the Iberian peninsula, Italy and Greece, then moved northward and re-populated Europe as the ice retreated. Anatolian Neolithic farmers colonized Europe once again, across the Mediterranean, up the into Iberia and France and into the isles creating the Monolith cultures, then across into central, and northern Europe, and Poland creating the Bell Beaker Cultures.
Eurasian Plain – To Wooded and River’ed Europe, Mostly northern, centered in Ukraine, Poland, Germany
Family and Clan Farms, Cattle, Sheep, Pigs, etc.
The Order of Institutions
There are three methods of influencing, coercing, or exercising power over humans:
Physical and Martial: Force – Defense
Resource Economic: Remuneration – Deprivation
Words Social: Ostracization – Inclusion
From these three Institutions we evolve:
The State and Law of Command (Hard, Fast, Expensive)
The Judiciary and Law of Property (Medium, Medium, Medium)
Religion and Law of Conformity and Exclusion (Soft, Slow, Cheap)
The order in which peoples develop these institutions determines their future, with whatever is first strongest, second less so, and third may or may not evolve at all.
The Middle east developed religion and the state but not law – a monopoly of religion
The Jews developed religion and law but failed at the state
The Chinese developed the state – a monopoly of the state- never developing religion or law.
The Hindus developed a Mythology and Norms – A monopoly of Religion – if you want to call Hinduism a religion.
The Europeans developed law, then state, and religion lagged until xianity.
Because of our experiences with the imposition of Xianity, the persistence of Christian fundamentalism, the 1400 year war against Islam, and continuous difficulty with the Jews, we presume religion is more important than the evidence suggests. China developed the state, Sun Tzu for war, Conflucious for society and the Tao for the self. Europe developed law and market government, Aristotelian Empiricism, Ethics, and Politics, Plato’s Republic for rule, and Stoicism and Epicureanism for the self while religion was largely ritual and sacrifice officiated by the aristocracy as a demonstration of loyalty. Whether Hinduism is a religion or bridge between mythology and philosophy is a difficult question, and while it appears to us in the present that the Indian people eventually succumbed to excess mysticism, just as Buddhism, itself trying to reform Hinduism, later succumbed as well, the Arthashastra (AR-thuh-shah-strah) of Kautilya written in 300bc is a work of law equally empirical compared to any other at the time. More empirical than semitic, more pragmatic than Confucian, less theoretic than european. That we indoctrinate people into fundamentalism in the middle east and west is a habit a tradition, but by the evidence, not a good one. There is more to learn from India and China. There is nothing to learn from the middle east except decline.
Each civilization faced the great transformation into larger scale organizations with different demographics and different dominant exercise of power. In the middle east, with it’s densely populated rivers and irrigation, priests arose first, and the heterogeneous multitude of tribes and large numbers of competitors were later conquered and territory consolidated by kings who sought power for themselves by the priesthood. In India the vast difference between the conquering IE-iranic peoples, the absence of competitors, large territory, the vast number of small farms, and the relatively homogenous dravidian and negrito underclasses favored wisdom literature, and the caste system. In China the relative isolation of the territory, the early and widespread use of rice farming, and irrigation, a military aristocracy dominated near-kin but were controlled by ritualization in exchange for status. In Europe the IE-Europeans killed off most of the farmers, kept and bred with their women, preserving homogeneity until they moved south into the Mediterranean. They retained their militarism even under agrarianism.
So the means of production and its density, the homogeneity or heterogeneity of the population producing it, the first institution to develop, and the means of scaling that institution produced very different civilizations.
But interestingly, the only tradition that produces a market for elites rather than a monpoly of elites is the western tradition of law
Western TriFunctionalism – Creating a Market for Elites
The Hindus created a religion of cast monopoly to protect themselves from dysgenia – although that is not the word they use for it. And in doing so they achieved upward redistribution of reproduction as the jews did in Europe – but at a much larger scale. They could not, however, limit the underclasses. The Chinese created state and bureaucratic monopoly, used it as a competition the way the Semites used scripture, and limited the underclasses by capital punishment, credit constraint, and the natural difficulty of rice farming in close quarters. The Europeans maintained the martial aristocracy, sent their lesser sons to the church nobility, and eventually evolved a commercial elite or bourgeoise, and they suppressed the bottom and pushed down the middle through manorialism – at least above the Hajnal Line (HIGH-nahl), but the upper class was never more than a few hundred thousand people, most of whom were related to the Carolingians in one way or another. The Semites, unfortunately, developed religion first, never developed the state and professional bureaucracy, and structured their entire civilization using religion to resist the aristocracies and their attempts to suppress underclass reproduction, employ reason and science, or even law.
The uniquenss of the western model was that by deveoping the institution of universal militia, and common law of tort first, was that they created markets in everything as well as markets for elites in aristocracy, law, and religion. We still see this today in theology, philosophy, law, and the sciences – which reflects the natural class structure. The chinese were close to europeans with Sun Tzu and the military, Confucius for the Bureaucracy, and Lao Tzu for the common people. The semites again practiced monopoly authoritarian supernaturalism, and conflated wisdm and law, truth and revelation, primacy of man and primacy of submission to a god.
This competition between elites prevented the stagnation that occurs when any given set of elites obtains a monopoly. Why? Because when you do that you have to lie. Really. When you train children, women, and the common folk through religion, conduct trade by the same empiricism in contracts, take measurements and produce construction by math and science, rule and adjudicate law by those same criteria, and practice innovative and adaptive warfare where men may take initiative, you prevent the formation of monopolies.
The Incentives to Produce Commons
European is an expensive strategy
What can I NOT Do to impose costs onothers
What can I do to contribut to commons?
Commons create good for everyone but are unconsumable.
The Glorious Accident
Everyone else failed
Strategy
Fully Militarized Society – An Army
For an army to succeed everyone must do his duty – first before self.
Cowardice: Self before duty to the commons is the only death penalty.
Aristocracy – Ruled by a Class of “Elected” Professional Warriors
Conquer and Domesticate plants, animals, people, and territory and profit from it.
Domesticate man from wild to slave to serf to freeman to citizen to sovereign – man can ascend by merit.
We are Few, So We Must Be Best (Germany still practices this)
“Aristocratic Egalitarianism” – We are Short of Numbers, So Seek Out The Best to Join.
Celebrate Life, Land, Existence, Prosperity, Wealth, Consumption, Sharing the Feast
Early Christianity provided women and underclasses means of ‘tolerating’ Domestication
Later Christianity provided the emerging middle class with civil heroics rather than martial – Chivalry was never practiced in the age of it.
The reason to achieve status from slave to serf to freeman to citizen to sovereign is to achieve self determination: sovereignty.
As such: By Joel Landoe
“The apparent privileges allegedly enjoyed by only one ethnicity (per social cartels, media etc) – Europeans – are due to an inequality of institutions, traditions, norms, paradigms, knowledge, values, resources, and goals [technology] that when applied in combination can be used by any person regardless of age, race, gender, or status for maximum self-actualization and development of good society.”
Scientifically: By Curt Doolittle
Only Europeans, and specifically male, conservative, and libertarian Europeans, paid the high cost, and counterintuitive cost, of discovering, adapting to, and applying the physical(material), biological (evolutionary), social (cooperative), laws of the universe, in thought, word, and deed, across the spectrum: personally, socially, economically, politically, militarily, and strategically (expansion, colonization, conquest).
As such whiteness is a technology. It is a costly technology. It is paid for like all technologies. And the results are acquired at high cost no others are willing to pay.
Evidentiary, warranted, warrantable Truth, reciprocity in display word and deed, competition in the service of others for survival by market adversity, meritocratic outcome in markets for association, cooperation, reproduction, production, common, polities, and most of all eugenic constraint on reproduction by test of meritocratic outcome – all of which are performed regardless of cost – are costs only Europeans evolved to bear.
And even such it’s only possible in the lesser classes by training in Christian exhaustive payment of psychological costs as virtuous contribution to the commons, and worthy of status even without intellectual, economic, political, and military success.
As such only European lower classes were slowly reduced in number, and reduced in cost, providing the counterintuitive excellence of western civilization: our Christian underclass, laboring classes, working classes, and lower-middle classes do the world’s least harm, while middle and upper classes do the world’s most good.
The counter-intuitive explanation for the three great ages of European success vs all other competing civilizations is that Europeans deviate the least from the laws of the universe and pay high costs for doing so but achieve the extraordinary returns for those investments.
So Europeans are not privileged. We merely pay the extraordinary costs that others do not.
Ergo others who come and don’t are thieves.
The Minority Problem Manifest
Whiteness (Europeanism) is a technology, yes, just as damns are technology. However, adoption & maintenance costs vary across human subspecies, & since the gains are incurred largely as a function of time, there is very little incentive for certain subspecies to adopt Europeanism – particularly subspecies known for hyperbolic discounting.
Europeanism as technology does have the advantage of framing failure as a product of choice—‘the technology is there why don’t you use it?’
However, I think europeanism is more appropriately framed as an extended phenotype, just as damns are the product of beaver’s genetic information. It shifts the moral conversation from specifying & allocating blame for the failure to one of unapologetic commitment to ourselves & our mission:
“We have no other choice than to be excellent. You are either coming along, contributing & carrying your own weight, or we will forcibly separate to remove the civilizational, institutional, economic, demographic drag.”
Communication (Military Liability > Contract > Reporting > Testimony)
”The King’s English” rules
Written tradition
Avoid conflict, intimacy
Don’t show emotion
Don’t discuss personal life
Be polite
Protestant Work Ethic (Army > Duty > Commons Before Self.)
Had work is the key to success
Work before play
“If you didn’t meet your goals, you didn’t work hatd enough”
Family Structure
Tbe nuclear family, father, mother, 2.3 children is the ideal social unit
Husband is breadwinner and head of househoid
Wife is homemaker and subordinate to the husband
Children should have own rooms, be independent
Status Power Authority (Empirical Meritocracy > Empirical Respect > Empirical Authority)
Wealth – worth – –
Your iob is who you are
Respect authority
Heavy value on ownetship of goods, space
Time (Duty First > commons before self > military and commercial efficiency,)
Follow rigid time schedules
Time viewed as a commodity
Future Orientation (Duty First > Do no harm by moral hazard > Responsibiity for future)
Plan for future
Delayed gratification
Progress is always best
Tomorrow will be better
History (And Mythology)
Based on Northern European Immtgtants’ experience an the United States
Heavy Focus on the British Empire
Me primacy of Western (Greek. Roman) and JudeoChflstian tradition
Aesthetics
Based on European culture
Steak and potatoes; ‘bland ts best”
Woman’s beauty based on blonde, thin – ”Barbe“
Man’s attractiveness based on economic status. power, Intellect
Religion
Christianity is the Norm
Anything other than Judeo – Christian tradition is foreign
No tolerance for deviation ftom single god concept
Holidays
Based on Christan traditions
Based on white history and male leaders
The Secret of Western Civilization
CALCULATION: MANEUVER, VELOCITY, ADAPTATION, SOVEREIGNTY, RECIPROCITY, TRUTH, DUTY, AND MARKETS
The West – Adaptive Velocity
The secret to western civilization, being a small, relatively poor population on the edge of the bronze age, is that by the choice of voluntary militia, military tactics of maneuver requiring contractualism, and heroic sovereignty (ownership of gains), we necessitated natural law, and markets in everything. And as a consequence the west was not first, but in every era we were fastest. In other words, truth, promise(contract), natural law, and jury allow us to adapt faster than every other known method of human cooperation.
European Strategy is:
Competitive Excellence (Success) by,
… the Continuous Production of Agency;
… through continuous invention, continuous adaptation, and continuous domestication, regardless of costs to the status, competence, dominance hierarchy – whether the self, family, or leadership;
… by the combination of:
Heroism, and;
Truth Regardless of Consequences to the Status, Competence, and Dominance Hierarchy – whether the self, family or leadership and;
Duty Regardless of Consequences to the self and family;
Sovereignty and Reciprocity including reciprocal insurance of sovereignty and reciprocity regardless of costs to the self and family;
… leaving the only possible rules of cooperation as:
The Rule of Law, The Law of Tort (property), the Independent Judiciary, and;
Markets (meritocracy) in every aspect of life: association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons, elites, grammars, group strategy, polities, group and war;
… resulting in:
Seeking and Finding of Pareto Optimums, in all markets;
The suppression of reproduction at the bottom and the upward redistribution of reproduction, defeating regression to the mean;
And the rapid transformation of men into the gods they imagined in the Neolithic, bronze, iron, and steel ages.
WHITE
“White” refers to: (a) descendants of the Indo European conquest of Europe, (b) who speak the indo-european language family, (c) who practice the indo european metaphysical and legal traditions, and (d) during the dark ages, converted from indo european derived religion to its antithesis: the Semitic derived Christian religion. The outlier property is the metaphysical and legal tradition that is what causes european civilizational uniqueness and is the reason for european excellence in the bronze, ancient, and modern worlds – with a thousand years of a superstitious dark age in between. It’s this uniqueness that demarcates ‘whites’ from other peoples more so than any other, and unfortunately, it is the least understood (until now, which is the focus of my work).
WHITENESS “Whiteness” as used pejoratively is a group strategy. It is a group strategy of northern Europeans (protestants). That group strategy is extremely costly. While we may be aware of the high cost of truth before face, the high cost of market meritocracy, and the high cost of high trust norms, it’s unspoken cost is that it is aggressively eugenic. This aggressive eugenics is as much or more important than any other cultural trait. Only the Chinese and the Europeans were able to institutionalize eugenic reproduction via manorialism, which accounts for the elevated intelligence of East Asians and Western Europeans: the underclasses were dramatically reduced through natural cold weather farming, reproductive suppression, and criminal prosecution. The world other than Korea japan and china who are equally the products of eugenic evolution (human self domestication) despies western civlization becuase it is expensive, it is counter-intuitive, and it is antithetical to them – but most importantly – because they cannot compete because they cannot repeat the eugenic processes themselves. Islam is perhaps the ultimate anti-civilization in history and is not a primitive group strategy. It produces decivilization and dysgenia by justifying the avoidance of all adaptive costs. The same is true for the current war by the left against western civlization – they seek to eliminate the payment of eugenic costs.
THE SPECTRUM 1 – Most narrowly: Northern Europeans above the Hajnal Line (North Sea Civ), who were not under catholicism long enough to lose their ancestral legal and traditional habits – especially those who escaped the long term corruption of the church. The north sea group began separating from the rest of the world rapidly and the great divergence of the greeks was repeated in the north sea beginning in 1000 ad (not 1400). 2 – Commonly: Christian European whether Germanic Scandinavian, Baltic, Slavic, or Finnic. (Continental Civ). This includes the three groups of Christianized european people: orthodox(greek), catholic(Latin), and protestant (Germanic) 3 – Less Commonly: Many be extended to include the descendants of early Neolithic farmers of the Balkans, Greece, Southern Italy, Sicily, and Sardinia because they are Christian and in the european territorial and cultural sphere of influence. (European Peninsular Civ) 4 – Uncommonly: May be extended to include the Iranic people of the caucuses: Georgians, Armenians. (European Extant Civ thru the Urals ) 5 – Rarely: May be extended to include the south-central West Eurasians – the Iranic peoples – but generally not. 6 – More rarely: May be extended to the Turkic peoples – but almost certainly not – because they don’t speak an IE language. 7 – Not including outbred peoples of the Indian subcontinent (who are a mixture of negrito hunter-gatherer, middle eastern hunter-gatherer (Dravidian), and Indo european steppe herders. 8 – Not including the Afro Asiatic Languages – Middle eastern Peoples. 9 – Never including African or East Asian Peoples, or Siberian Peoples (Amerindians). 10 – Never including admixture peoples (along the out-of-Africa route from Yemen, to India, to SE Asia, to Australia.
[I] won’t apologize for making the right call to deescalate. I didn’t fall for the bait. Those that showed practiced Gandhi’s strategy of love thine enemy. I practiced the statesman’s strategy of disarm thine enemy. On short notice, we organized enough but not too many people to require a permit. We rode on existing police presence in a place we know wouldn’t tolerate Antifa violence. We had our launch, I made my speech. The speech is profound. we got raided by BLM and the left’s camera people. They did their usual “create optics”. You morons fell for the bait. We didn’t. You did. And you still do. This is why the enemy wins. Your vanity. Meanwhile, we’re trying to find a way to reach the 1% of people on the right worthy of reaching.
All the more true with failed leaders. They should pay the complete price for their mistakes. Only when our people are willing to demand the full price be paid, will we manifest worthy leaders. We get what we deserve. Forgiveness is a failed strategy. Why forgive somebody who isn’t even asking for forgiveness? They are signaling that they will make the same mistakes again.
You’re talking about The “Crab Bucket” Instinct of the Losing Right.
Tolerant of the enemy. Tolerant of yourselves. Intolerant of your leaders?
Purity Spiraling. It’s selfish and pathetic. What does the enemy do when one of their leaders is overrun? They lift them up for the heroic effort of fighting for them.
So then, what constitutes a failure of the leader, and what constitutes a failure of the followers? The right fails because of the followers. That’s why the leaders all abandon you. You want what will make them fail. If you’re falling for the left’s bait isn’t a failure of the leader, it’s a failure of the followers. And y’all fail over and over again because you fall for the left’s tactics, and you want the wrong leaders, to use the wrong strategy.
You haven’t figured out that you have nothing to trade, nothing to offer, no one wants you, your elites have left you behind, the enemy elites have taken over, a third of our own have gone with the enemy. A third more will follow the enemy out of pragmatism, and the third that is you – absent leaders – will continue the fantasy that you’re virtuous, that you’re worthy, that you have character, that you’re competent for anything other than extermination by the enemy, because you’re SELFISH, ARROGANT, VAIN, and cowardly.
You’re the bottom of the political spectrum for a reason. And the whole world hates you and is out to destroy you. Yet you think you ‘deserve’ perfect leadership? You think you would even KNOW that leadership if it arose? The right has lost media, academy, financial, state, and military leadership – and what did you do to defend them? So what have those leaders done? They took the money and left you to perish for your arrogance, selfishness, and pride.
You think the bottom of the left can lead? Of course not. We call that socialism communism and islamism. You think the bottom of the right can lead? Of course not, we call that Churchianity and fascism. There is no difference between the incompetent right and the incompetent left EXCEPT THE LEFT SHOWS UP AND FIGHTS, and never stops – ever.
People come to western civilization because we have the only middle, working, and laboring classes that are willing to practice self-sufficiency. Thats the reason for our success. That’s the ONLY reason. If you use markets, rule of law, and combine eugenics, with middle and lower classes that are self-sufficient, you will have greater quality of life than all others that don’t. Because the marginal ability of people is limited, but the marginal ability of people not to cause harm is far greater. We benefit by what we do NOT do.
You are only able to practice self-sufficiency because the American continent is the most strategic territory on earth; our military is large enough to dictate world financial and trade policy; we sell the continent off to generations of immigrations for the benefit of the financial sector; the common folk (morons) are able to live easily because of it, and we still have enough rule of law so that those who wish to innovate can rise to wealth in the markets.
You’re just WRONG to think you’re exceptional other than your limited willingness for self-sufficiency. Everything else you’re wrong about. In fact you hold yourselves up as virtuous for doing nothing at all.
The enemy are using your willingness for self-sufficiency until you’re gone. And you’re suckers for it. And yet you want heroic visionary saviors. and you want to live vicariously (in your imagination) through some leader rather than to actively support and help them.YOu don’t donate money to causes. You don’t show And you want those leaders to use tactics that you can FEEL GOOD about rather than hose that will WIN. There are none. There never will be. You want parents because you’re children.
So keep waiting for Jesus and Hitler. You aren’t going to get them. You’re doing nothing except buying the enemy time to win. All you are doing is virtue signaling while practicing cowardly feminine Christian resistance. You’re demanding of others, not yourselves. You want to sit at home and feel brave and SERVED by better men. You don’t want to act, to contribute, to fight for your people – you want others to do it and you want to vicariously live through better people than you are who did it for you and pretend you had something to do with it.
You’re like a gaggle of frightened women demanding men step up.
You want to be pandered to and catered to.
You won’t show up. You won’t risk. You won’t do anything except bitch and whine. You won’t even work to LEARN.
And you have no strategy, no plan, no willingness to compromise.
You have nothing.
They bait your pride. Your false pride. Your false virtues.
You’re just childish, selfish, whining cowards.
Hiding behind false virtue.
False pride.
Pride in your imaginations rather than in your actions.
And your false bravado ‘bravery’ will be crushed as the left takes power and picks you off one at a time just like they have been for decades. They will continue to pursue optics and you will continue to fall for them. You will take the bait. Until they have power. Once in power they will use gun registration lists. They will use voter registration lists. Church registries. Social media. Reporting by neighbors, reporting by co-workers, to produce another Bolshevik suppression of you and yours and eventually your extermination by a repetition of the Bolshevik purges. Any group that tries to organize anything will be plucked immediately. You will be a tiny white Russian resistance movement against a vast majority bolshevik state, and cultural minority within an ethic minority rule by a Jewish financial class, and mixed-race state bureaucracy and institutions.
And the whole world will cheer them on. You will be the New Romans in the new ‘anticolonial’ ‘globalist’ theology of hatred of your people and European civilization. And you will be gone as are the Romans. Meanwhile a white minority upper class will go on and they and the jews will rule a world without you. And you will pass into history for your vanity.
The only way to fix you is to deprive you of your vanity, of your pretense of value, of your pretense of virtue, and show you for what you are: the last desperate gasp of the European lower classes before you’re extinguished.
And you have nothing to offer but to show up as often as possible and fight as hard as possible to win, within keeping your mouths shut, stoically avoiding taking the bait, ignoring the enemy’s attempt to creat optics, and seizing power by force.
You don’t get to make demands. You get to show up. You get to follow anyone with the guts to try a strategy that will succeed.
Otherwise, you’re done. You’re the minority in the school population as of this year. And evolution will have made her choice: that you were unworthy of her attentions. And you and all before you will pass quietly into the night. As you are picked off by the left’s superior strategy.
