By Tom McSweeny The aristocrats come to understand that the world contains mechanisms of action between its elements AND that those mechanisms of action can be exploited. The masses, through lack of ability, ignorance and as victims of deceit see meanings and mysterious ways. Management: Improve the quality of the parent > improve the quality of the parenting > improve the quality of the children. As we’ve seen recently, the parents are self-destructing (heads of states with no kids, mass expansion of underclass, importation of foreign underclass, genetic terrorism against their own, perpetuating ignorance regarding how the world works) and the parenting has gone seriously awry. The children suffer. The Law stands above all classes and is upheld by eugenic classes for their mutual benefit and survival intergenerationally. Higher standards of parenting must be enforced for gains all around through time. At present, the village shaman is in a lot of trouble for his short-sighted advices. We’re back to blacksmiths from earlier: the aristocrat organises the exploitation of every available avenue of the relationship between every element in the world for return on investment for kith and kin. Discovering and exploiting those mechanisms of action, we have our prized shamans, magicians, our blacksmiths, our discoverers, advisors to the king, explaining how the damn thing (the world) works. Our kings lived and died with our people by how well they could map and exploit the world and its elements. The totality of it, when you think about how we started with casting bones to the many technical, replicable fields that have been mapped out, tested, engineered, combined, is truly staggering. Beautifully, marvellously staggering. And you, we, have our ancestors to thank for that. From bones to spaceships. We come from a proud culture and it has every right to be such. Now the onus on us, the heroic challenge, can we, will we, be able to say ‘See me Odin’ (Watch this (gran)dad’)? What you’ve done Curt, is bring together those who want to say Fuck yes. Thanks Daniel and Curt.
Form: Excerpt
-
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/40143670_287522638511300_24635444888
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/40143670_287522638511300_2463544488811823104_o_287522631844634.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/40263494_287522668511297_1979326457066815488_n_287522665177964.jpg EXAMPLE OF J-CRITIQUE
Note that (a) I am defending Einstein. (b) he doesn’t understand that I am but is having a feminine reaction to criticism of one of her children, (c) claims expertise but only demonstrates the use of gossip (praise) rather than addressing any of the criticisms of Einstein (that are false).
Once you realize their women, and you know how women cognate, then they are very simple.
What I am most fascinated by, is the fact that when a pseudo-male uses feminine argument, we respond differently than if a females uses feminine argument.
It demonstrates that we in fact do not take women seriously, and we take men who argue in the feminine (pilpul and critique) less seriously despite the fact that their WORDS INFLUENCE WOMEN MORE THAN OURS.
WOMEN ARE OUR WEAKNESS.
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-27 10:05:00 UTC
-
We Had No Religion only Law, Oath, Festival and Myth (Literature)
—“It is perhaps misleading even to say that there was such a religion as paganism at the beginning of [the Common Era] … It might be less confusing to say that the pagans, before their competition with Christianity, had no religion at all in the sense in which that word is normally used today. They had no tradition of discourse about ritual or religious matters (apart from philosophical debate or antiquarian treatise), no organized system of beliefs to which they were asked to commit themselves, no authority-structure peculiar to the religious area, above all no commitment to a particular group of people or set of ideas other than their family and political context. If this is the right view of pagan life, it follows that we should look on paganism quite simply as a religion invented in the course of the second to third centuries AD, in competition and interaction with Christians, Jews and others. — North 1992, 187—88, [34]
-
We Had No Religion only Law, Oath, Festival and Myth (Literature)
—“It is perhaps misleading even to say that there was such a religion as paganism at the beginning of [the Common Era] … It might be less confusing to say that the pagans, before their competition with Christianity, had no religion at all in the sense in which that word is normally used today. They had no tradition of discourse about ritual or religious matters (apart from philosophical debate or antiquarian treatise), no organized system of beliefs to which they were asked to commit themselves, no authority-structure peculiar to the religious area, above all no commitment to a particular group of people or set of ideas other than their family and political context. If this is the right view of pagan life, it follows that we should look on paganism quite simply as a religion invented in the course of the second to third centuries AD, in competition and interaction with Christians, Jews and others. — North 1992, 187—88, [34]
-
Steve Pender Spring Summer Quotes
—“The lowering of standards has no bottom, but the raising of standards is limited only by natural law. It’s far easier to stick near the top than to climb back up a path that took billions of years. Which way, western man?”— Steve Pender —“Having Nuclear Weapons in a polity is like having guns in the household. If you don’t have one, your sovereignty depends on those who do.”—Steve Pender —“Sometimes war happens just because people want to see change in their lifetime.”— Steve Pender —“Politics is outsourcing and only to be used when common ground is obtainable. For anything that really matters, DIY. Nobody ever voted to start a revolution.”– Steve Pender —“Those who don’t take the red pill willingly will have it shoved down their throat by reality any way.”—Steve Pender —“Anonymity’s downside is network uncertainty”.— Steve Pender —“Melania Trump has more children than the leaders of Germany, France, England and Italy combined. The leaders of genocide are genocidal.”– Steve Pender —“Fascism originates from communism… Only in the sense that chemo was created because of cancer.”—Steve Pender —“I doubt any people have ever won a war where they did not reach a consensus on who the enemy was. Democracy lets divisions fester. But now the extremity of our division prevents consensus on existential threats. In that case, internal separation will occur until eventually the divided sides will fight it out.”— Steve Pender —“Truth suppresses parasites and liars. It’s a prosecutorial tool. The damage it inflicts is part of its value.”—Steve Pender —“Hate stems either from lack of exit, lack of autonomy, or predicted declining future autonomy/exit.”–Steve Pender —“Suicide is never honorable. It kills an ally without taking out any enemies in the process.”— Steve Pender
- —“Your life is yours to give, not to take.”—Dan Warren
—“Violence hasn’t decreased. It’s just been temporarily monopolized by the state and underclass.”—Steve Pender
-
Steve Pender Spring Summer Quotes
—“The lowering of standards has no bottom, but the raising of standards is limited only by natural law. It’s far easier to stick near the top than to climb back up a path that took billions of years. Which way, western man?”— Steve Pender —“Having Nuclear Weapons in a polity is like having guns in the household. If you don’t have one, your sovereignty depends on those who do.”—Steve Pender —“Sometimes war happens just because people want to see change in their lifetime.”— Steve Pender —“Politics is outsourcing and only to be used when common ground is obtainable. For anything that really matters, DIY. Nobody ever voted to start a revolution.”– Steve Pender —“Those who don’t take the red pill willingly will have it shoved down their throat by reality any way.”—Steve Pender —“Anonymity’s downside is network uncertainty”.— Steve Pender —“Melania Trump has more children than the leaders of Germany, France, England and Italy combined. The leaders of genocide are genocidal.”– Steve Pender —“Fascism originates from communism… Only in the sense that chemo was created because of cancer.”—Steve Pender —“I doubt any people have ever won a war where they did not reach a consensus on who the enemy was. Democracy lets divisions fester. But now the extremity of our division prevents consensus on existential threats. In that case, internal separation will occur until eventually the divided sides will fight it out.”— Steve Pender —“Truth suppresses parasites and liars. It’s a prosecutorial tool. The damage it inflicts is part of its value.”—Steve Pender —“Hate stems either from lack of exit, lack of autonomy, or predicted declining future autonomy/exit.”–Steve Pender —“Suicide is never honorable. It kills an ally without taking out any enemies in the process.”— Steve Pender
- —“Your life is yours to give, not to take.”—Dan Warren
—“Violence hasn’t decreased. It’s just been temporarily monopolized by the state and underclass.”—Steve Pender
-
Yes Conspiracies Exist.
–“The recent wave of censorship of conservative voices on the internet by tech giants Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and Apple mirrors a plan concocted by a coalition of George Soros-funded, progressive groups to take back power in Washington from President Trump’s administration. A confidential, 49-page memo for defeating Trump by working with the major social-media platforms to eliminate “right wing propaganda and fake news” was presented in January 2017 by Media Matters founder David Brock at a retreat in Florida with about 100 donors, the Washington Free Beacon reported at the time. On Monday, the Gateway Pundit blog noted the memo’s relationship with recent moves by Silicon Valley tech giants to “shadow ban” conservative political candidates and pundits and remove content. The Free Beacon obtained a copy of the memo, “Democracy Matters: Strategic Plan for Action,” by attending the retreat. The memo spells out a four-year agenda that deployed Media Matters along with American Bridge, Shareblue and Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) to attack Trump and Republicans. The strategies are impeachment, expanding Media Matters’ mission to combat “government misinformation,” ensuring Democratic control of the Senate in the 2018 midterm elections, filing lawsuits against the Trump administration, monetizing political advocacy, using a “digital attacker” to delegitimize Trump’s presidency and damage Republicans, and partnering with Facebook to combat “fake news.” Quashing ‘fake news’ with ‘mathematical precision’ The Free Beacon in its January 2017 story said Brock sought to raise $40 million in 2017 for his organizations. The document claims Media Matters and far-left groups have “access to raw data from Facebook, Twitter, and other social media sites” so they can “systemically monitor and analyze this unfiltered data.” “The earlier we can identify a fake news story, the more effectively we can quash it,” the memo states. “With this new technology at our fingertips, researchers monitoring news in real time will be able to identify the origins of a lie with mathematical precision, creating an early warning system for fake news and disinformation.” Media Matters met with Facebook, which boasts some 2 billion members worldwide, to discuss how to crack down on fake news, according to the memo. The social media giant was provided with “a detailed map of the constellation of right-wing Facebook pages that had been the biggest purveyors of fake news.” Brock’s memo also says Media Matters gave Google “the information necessary to identify 40 of the worst fake new sites” so they could be banned from Google’s advertising network. The Gateway Pundit pointed out that in 2016, Google carried out that plan on the Gateway Pundit blog and other conservative sites, including Breitbart, the Drudge Report, Infowars, Zero Hedge and Conservative Treehouse. Facebook, meanwhile has changed its newsfeed algorithm, ostensibly to combat “fake news,” causing a precipitous decline in traffic for many conservative sites. President Donald Trump himself was affected, with his engagement on Facebook dropping by 45 percent. A study in June by Gateway Pundit found Facebook had eliminated 93 percent of the traffic of top conservative news outlets. Western Journal, in its own study, found that while left-wing publishers saw a roughly 2 percent increase in web traffic from Facebook following the algorithm changes, conservative sites saw a loss of traffic averaging around 14 percent. ‘Totalitarian impulse’ of the left President Trump’s 2020 campaign manager charged last week the giants of Silicon Valley are stifling free speech, particularly conservative speech, manifesting the “inherent totalitarian impulse” of the left. On Friday, Facebook appeared to be “shadow banning” the non-profit education site PragerU, founded by talk-host Dennis Prager, causing a drop in engagement of 99.9999 percent while removing two videos regarded as “hate speech.” After Facebook rejected a highly inspirational ad for a Republican congressional candidate that included images depicting her parents’ persecution under the Khmer Rouge communist regime in Cambodia, Twitter followed up with its own ban. WND reported earlier this month Facebook banned a pro-life video ad by a judicial candidate, giving the same explanation. On Aug. 6, WND reported, Facebook, YouTube and Apple banned commentator Alex Jones and his Infowars website within hours of each other. Last month, WND reported moderate Muslims and counter-terrorist activists were increasingly being restricted by Silicon Valley, while terrorist content remains on social-media platforms, according to researchers. Trump campaign chief Parscale said last week the banning of Jones “will inevitably lead to the silencing of those with far less controversial opinions.” “What we are seeing in Big Tech is the inherent totalitarian impulse of the Left come into full focus,” Parscale said.
-
Yes Conspiracies Exist.
–“The recent wave of censorship of conservative voices on the internet by tech giants Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and Apple mirrors a plan concocted by a coalition of George Soros-funded, progressive groups to take back power in Washington from President Trump’s administration. A confidential, 49-page memo for defeating Trump by working with the major social-media platforms to eliminate “right wing propaganda and fake news” was presented in January 2017 by Media Matters founder David Brock at a retreat in Florida with about 100 donors, the Washington Free Beacon reported at the time. On Monday, the Gateway Pundit blog noted the memo’s relationship with recent moves by Silicon Valley tech giants to “shadow ban” conservative political candidates and pundits and remove content. The Free Beacon obtained a copy of the memo, “Democracy Matters: Strategic Plan for Action,” by attending the retreat. The memo spells out a four-year agenda that deployed Media Matters along with American Bridge, Shareblue and Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) to attack Trump and Republicans. The strategies are impeachment, expanding Media Matters’ mission to combat “government misinformation,” ensuring Democratic control of the Senate in the 2018 midterm elections, filing lawsuits against the Trump administration, monetizing political advocacy, using a “digital attacker” to delegitimize Trump’s presidency and damage Republicans, and partnering with Facebook to combat “fake news.” Quashing ‘fake news’ with ‘mathematical precision’ The Free Beacon in its January 2017 story said Brock sought to raise $40 million in 2017 for his organizations. The document claims Media Matters and far-left groups have “access to raw data from Facebook, Twitter, and other social media sites” so they can “systemically monitor and analyze this unfiltered data.” “The earlier we can identify a fake news story, the more effectively we can quash it,” the memo states. “With this new technology at our fingertips, researchers monitoring news in real time will be able to identify the origins of a lie with mathematical precision, creating an early warning system for fake news and disinformation.” Media Matters met with Facebook, which boasts some 2 billion members worldwide, to discuss how to crack down on fake news, according to the memo. The social media giant was provided with “a detailed map of the constellation of right-wing Facebook pages that had been the biggest purveyors of fake news.” Brock’s memo also says Media Matters gave Google “the information necessary to identify 40 of the worst fake new sites” so they could be banned from Google’s advertising network. The Gateway Pundit pointed out that in 2016, Google carried out that plan on the Gateway Pundit blog and other conservative sites, including Breitbart, the Drudge Report, Infowars, Zero Hedge and Conservative Treehouse. Facebook, meanwhile has changed its newsfeed algorithm, ostensibly to combat “fake news,” causing a precipitous decline in traffic for many conservative sites. President Donald Trump himself was affected, with his engagement on Facebook dropping by 45 percent. A study in June by Gateway Pundit found Facebook had eliminated 93 percent of the traffic of top conservative news outlets. Western Journal, in its own study, found that while left-wing publishers saw a roughly 2 percent increase in web traffic from Facebook following the algorithm changes, conservative sites saw a loss of traffic averaging around 14 percent. ‘Totalitarian impulse’ of the left President Trump’s 2020 campaign manager charged last week the giants of Silicon Valley are stifling free speech, particularly conservative speech, manifesting the “inherent totalitarian impulse” of the left. On Friday, Facebook appeared to be “shadow banning” the non-profit education site PragerU, founded by talk-host Dennis Prager, causing a drop in engagement of 99.9999 percent while removing two videos regarded as “hate speech.” After Facebook rejected a highly inspirational ad for a Republican congressional candidate that included images depicting her parents’ persecution under the Khmer Rouge communist regime in Cambodia, Twitter followed up with its own ban. WND reported earlier this month Facebook banned a pro-life video ad by a judicial candidate, giving the same explanation. On Aug. 6, WND reported, Facebook, YouTube and Apple banned commentator Alex Jones and his Infowars website within hours of each other. Last month, WND reported moderate Muslims and counter-terrorist activists were increasingly being restricted by Silicon Valley, while terrorist content remains on social-media platforms, according to researchers. Trump campaign chief Parscale said last week the banning of Jones “will inevitably lead to the silencing of those with far less controversial opinions.” “What we are seeing in Big Tech is the inherent totalitarian impulse of the Left come into full focus,” Parscale said.
-
What Does an Army Look Like?
by Eric Best The left was once scattered and relatively powerless, though not as much as the true right today, since there weren’t the same societal and institutional pressures keeping them from organizing and acting. They had sources of funding and support both foreign and domestic to lessen the risk they faced. An important fringe leftist in the 60’s would have, for instance, an unassailable position in a University and a circle of admirers among the upper class. Even if a majority of Americans would find them detestable (if they knew who they were), they would not lose their job and more importantly, would not be outcast from their part of society. It took them decades to get where they are now, having taken over so many institutions that their ideology and worldview is now the default. We can’t imitate them because we don’t have 50 years to do it and the social dynamic is totally different. Everyone knows what they can do as an individual in their own life to be better and prepare (i.e. stop being a NEET sperging out uselessly on the internet) but 1 million individuals even of quality do not make an army. What is the first real step to organizing seriously? What does it look like?
-
What Does an Army Look Like?
by Eric Best The left was once scattered and relatively powerless, though not as much as the true right today, since there weren’t the same societal and institutional pressures keeping them from organizing and acting. They had sources of funding and support both foreign and domestic to lessen the risk they faced. An important fringe leftist in the 60’s would have, for instance, an unassailable position in a University and a circle of admirers among the upper class. Even if a majority of Americans would find them detestable (if they knew who they were), they would not lose their job and more importantly, would not be outcast from their part of society. It took them decades to get where they are now, having taken over so many institutions that their ideology and worldview is now the default. We can’t imitate them because we don’t have 50 years to do it and the social dynamic is totally different. Everyone knows what they can do as an individual in their own life to be better and prepare (i.e. stop being a NEET sperging out uselessly on the internet) but 1 million individuals even of quality do not make an army. What is the first real step to organizing seriously? What does it look like?