Form: Excerpt

(Rant from a friend, I found humorous partly because of the obvious frustration) By @Septeus7

I’m tired of this round of PR from the Creationist/IDist. The “new” tactic is borrow from SJWs by employing a univariant (fallacy) model of mutation and then claim Darwinian selection fails because the probably of functional mutation in a single domain. So dumb.

Quote from  @curtdoolittle: —“Information can only be stored in some memory or other, information stored must be abstracted (generalized) in order to consume less calories and volume that the original matter and its changes in state over time.”—

This statement shows that you will get variation in any system that copies information of itself. Natural Selection is simply the 2nd Law applying to replication. All creationists deny the 2nd law. They fundamentally don’t understand it. All order flows from the 2nd. I have idiots asking stupid questions about mutation boundaries…like why doesn’t mutation kill entire populations? Because you can’t mutate if you are dead. The boundary system is differential reproduction i.e. NS. Creationist/IDist are dumbest f*kers on the planet. The stupidity of Creationists is greatest argument for why there is no Intelligent Designer because no Intelligent Designer would create a system of biology with a built in selection bias for the cognitive failures that are the low IQ ID believers. If you going to challenge a “theory of biology” then present a physical mechanism for the changes we observe. It’s not that hard. Explain how you pre-adopt changes to memory of a reproductive machine….go ahead do it. You can’t. Darwin didn’t defeat Creationism. Boltzmann did. Boltzmann was incredibly rigorous and eventually committed suicide out of guilt. What guilt? He rigorously systematically destroyed Plato, Kant, all every Metaphysician in all of philosophy and religion killing them forever and they are still butthurt about it.

(Rant from a friend, I found humorous partly because of the obvious frustration) By @Septeus7

I’m tired of this round of PR from the Creationist/IDist. The “new” tactic is borrow from SJWs by employing a univariant (fallacy) model of mutation and then claim Darwinian selection fails because the probably of functional mutation in a single domain. So dumb.

Quote from  @curtdoolittle: —“Information can only be stored in some memory or other, information stored must be abstracted (generalized) in order to consume less calories and volume that the original matter and its changes in state over time.”—

This statement shows that you will get variation in any system that copies information of itself. Natural Selection is simply the 2nd Law applying to replication. All creationists deny the 2nd law. They fundamentally don’t understand it. All order flows from the 2nd. I have idiots asking stupid questions about mutation boundaries…like why doesn’t mutation kill entire populations? Because you can’t mutate if you are dead. The boundary system is differential reproduction i.e. NS. Creationist/IDist are dumbest f*kers on the planet. The stupidity of Creationists is greatest argument for why there is no Intelligent Designer because no Intelligent Designer would create a system of biology with a built in selection bias for the cognitive failures that are the low IQ ID believers. If you going to challenge a “theory of biology” then present a physical mechanism for the changes we observe. It’s not that hard. Explain how you pre-adopt changes to memory of a reproductive machine….go ahead do it. You can’t. Darwin didn’t defeat Creationism. Boltzmann did. Boltzmann was incredibly rigorous and eventually committed suicide out of guilt. What guilt? He rigorously systematically destroyed Plato, Kant, all every Metaphysician in all of philosophy and religion killing them forever and they are still butthurt about it.