Curt Doolittle

Form: Excerpt

  • Iron Cold Iron (revised Edition)

    Mar 28, 2020, 4:40 PM IRON COLD IRON (REVISED EDITION) Gold is for the mistress — silver for the maid — Copper for the craftsman cunning at his trade. “Good!” said the Baron, sitting in his hall, “But Iron — Cold Iron — is master of them all.” So he made rebellion ‘gainst the King his liege, Camped before his citadel and summoned it to siege. “Nay!” said the cannoneer on the castle wall, “But Iron — Cold Iron — shall be master of you all!” Woe for the Baron and his knights so strong, When the cruel cannon-balls laid ’em all along; He was taken prisoner, he was cast in thrall, And Iron — Cold Iron — was master of it all! Yet his King spake kindly (ah, how kind a Lord!) “What if I release thee now and give thee back thy sword?” “Nay!” said the Baron, “Thou wouldst not trust my word, For Iron — Cold Iron — is master of men all.” Tears are for the craven, prayers are for the clown — Halters for the silly neck that cannot keep a crown. “As my crime is grievous, by law my hope is small, For Iron — Cold Iron — must be master of men all!” Crowns are for the valiant — Lances for the bold! Thrones and powers for mighty men who dare to take and hold. “Hang!” said the Baron, Seated in his hall, “For Iron — Cold Iron — is master of men all!

    (Apologies to Kipling for correcting the errors in his work)

  • The Iron Gauntlet, Reformation of Smithian Political Economy:

    Apr 2, 2020, 2:17 PM by James Krieger (gold) The satisfaction of preferences tend toward equilibrium in that the utility produced by the satisfaction of the marginal preference, ceteris paribus, never exceeds the cost of satisfying the marginal preference. Rule of Law ensures equilibrium by prosecution (via negativa) in the event of externality i.e. the law ensures that all externalities are internalized such that the social-optimum emerges from the optimizing behavior of individuals. Markets for goods & services function to ensure equilibrium in private-consumption of consumer-goods & by extension allocative efficiency in capital markets through the production of price signals–via positva production; whereas the market for rule & commons ensures equilibrium by incrementally suppressing the satisfaction of preference at the expense of peers & commons­–via negativa elimination of externality. (Smith was wrong. The ‘hand’ that guides the division of perception, cognition & labor is iron, not invisible.) —CD— Stated in P-law: Economics is a measure of the group’s success at suppression of irreciprocity with the rule of law.

  • The Iron Gauntlet, Reformation of Smithian Political Economy:

    Apr 2, 2020, 2:17 PM by James Krieger (gold) The satisfaction of preferences tend toward equilibrium in that the utility produced by the satisfaction of the marginal preference, ceteris paribus, never exceeds the cost of satisfying the marginal preference. Rule of Law ensures equilibrium by prosecution (via negativa) in the event of externality i.e. the law ensures that all externalities are internalized such that the social-optimum emerges from the optimizing behavior of individuals. Markets for goods & services function to ensure equilibrium in private-consumption of consumer-goods & by extension allocative efficiency in capital markets through the production of price signals–via positva production; whereas the market for rule & commons ensures equilibrium by incrementally suppressing the satisfaction of preference at the expense of peers & commons­–via negativa elimination of externality. (Smith was wrong. The ‘hand’ that guides the division of perception, cognition & labor is iron, not invisible.) —CD— Stated in P-law: Economics is a measure of the group’s success at suppression of irreciprocity with the rule of law.

  • Quote

  • Quote

  • Civic Duty: Help Identify Right Wing Npc’s

    ‘”FED!!!” RIGHT WING NPC IDENTIFICATION POSTER’ Therapy can help. Education is useless.

    by NJ Gregory: It’s definitely true, we on the right have our own NPCs and they sure do spend an inordinate amount of time calling others “feds”. Imagine if they just used that same time doing something productive like learning or starting a business or something. I wonder what percentage of those accused of being a fed actually are… like maybe: .00000000001%? Reeks of ‘noia.

  • See? Christianity Will Play a Vital Role

    May 23, 2020, 7:56 AM by Lloyd Grainger (hey everyone I’m reposting this…) Listen people. My brother and I are strong Evangelical Christians. Unbeknownst to myself and my brother we are also Aryan, due to Curt Doolittle’s definition. Also as soon as the reset button is pushed by someone we are ready to start the fight. We will extinguish any and all liberals/leftist, including those who claim to be Christian, until there are no more or we are killed in action. Petty bickering is fruitless. Anybody that is a true Christian revels in the possibility of reciprocity. And natural law. To exterminate all parasitism and rent-seeking even in the church. I was very concerned about how Christians and the natural law of reciprocity can coexist. So I searched for religion and any and all documents on the properterian institute website. And studied all the videos about Christianity that CD posted. And have came to the conclusion that Christianity and the church will play a vital part and the new reconstructed natural law Constitution 2.0. Curt admits that there is no way possible to legislate what someone thinks and believes. We can only legislate the negatives for what somebody cannot do through word deed or display. All this is very possible, but the problem will be in many cases from our dogmatic legalistic leaders. That want to force our society to be a Christian only society. And have all our laws based on Christianity. This is not possible under reciprocity. But seriously, after all the parasites, rent seekers, liars, cheats, and any other term you want to use are eliminated. The matter of conforming our Christianity and to the natural law of reciprocity in word deed and display will not be a problem. I don’t fully understand how it will all play out; but I have no doubt but it will work out. After all if we truly believe that God is in charge, then what would we be scared of. Thanks everybody. Due to me being a Navy chief petty officer I tend to not be very touchy-feely. So I hope you catch the spirit of my message, and not necessarily how I say it.

  • See? Christianity Will Play a Vital Role

    May 23, 2020, 7:56 AM by Lloyd Grainger (hey everyone I’m reposting this…) Listen people. My brother and I are strong Evangelical Christians. Unbeknownst to myself and my brother we are also Aryan, due to Curt Doolittle’s definition. Also as soon as the reset button is pushed by someone we are ready to start the fight. We will extinguish any and all liberals/leftist, including those who claim to be Christian, until there are no more or we are killed in action. Petty bickering is fruitless. Anybody that is a true Christian revels in the possibility of reciprocity. And natural law. To exterminate all parasitism and rent-seeking even in the church. I was very concerned about how Christians and the natural law of reciprocity can coexist. So I searched for religion and any and all documents on the properterian institute website. And studied all the videos about Christianity that CD posted. And have came to the conclusion that Christianity and the church will play a vital part and the new reconstructed natural law Constitution 2.0. Curt admits that there is no way possible to legislate what someone thinks and believes. We can only legislate the negatives for what somebody cannot do through word deed or display. All this is very possible, but the problem will be in many cases from our dogmatic legalistic leaders. That want to force our society to be a Christian only society. And have all our laws based on Christianity. This is not possible under reciprocity. But seriously, after all the parasites, rent seekers, liars, cheats, and any other term you want to use are eliminated. The matter of conforming our Christianity and to the natural law of reciprocity in word deed and display will not be a problem. I don’t fully understand how it will all play out; but I have no doubt but it will work out. After all if we truly believe that God is in charge, then what would we be scared of. Thanks everybody. Due to me being a Navy chief petty officer I tend to not be very touchy-feely. So I hope you catch the spirit of my message, and not necessarily how I say it.

  • Every Man a Common Man

    Oct 3, 2019, 7:17 AM By: Bill Joslin, via Brandon Hayes (CD: core) A model for this could be described as concentric rings of influence, centering on the individual and radiating out into the commons based on which domain one acts as judge-of-last-resort. Am I judge-of-last-resort for my mind (clarity of intention) Am I judge-of-last-resort for my body (voluntary intentional action) Am I judge-of-last-resort for my household (do I direct my domestic life) Am I judge-of-last-resort for my livelihood (do I direct my means of survival) Am I judge-of-last-resort which secures (ensures) my property-en-toto Am I judge-of-last-resort in the intergenerational shared commons (do I direct my place in history) For each of those questions, if there is another person to which you are beholden then the answer is no. Everyman a king of his household Everyman a rifleman Everyman a sheriff Everyman a judge ….in opportunity only, secured by demonstrations of ability. Cult of non-submission – cultivation of autonomy

  • Every Man a Common Man

    Oct 3, 2019, 7:17 AM By: Bill Joslin, via Brandon Hayes (CD: core) A model for this could be described as concentric rings of influence, centering on the individual and radiating out into the commons based on which domain one acts as judge-of-last-resort. Am I judge-of-last-resort for my mind (clarity of intention) Am I judge-of-last-resort for my body (voluntary intentional action) Am I judge-of-last-resort for my household (do I direct my domestic life) Am I judge-of-last-resort for my livelihood (do I direct my means of survival) Am I judge-of-last-resort which secures (ensures) my property-en-toto Am I judge-of-last-resort in the intergenerational shared commons (do I direct my place in history) For each of those questions, if there is another person to which you are beholden then the answer is no. Everyman a king of his household Everyman a rifleman Everyman a sheriff Everyman a judge ….in opportunity only, secured by demonstrations of ability. Cult of non-submission – cultivation of autonomy