Form: Definition

  • “TO RULE: TO PROVIDE A MEANS FOR THE RESOLUTION OF CONFLICTS.” Rule is decided b

    “TO RULE: TO PROVIDE A MEANS FOR THE RESOLUTION OF CONFLICTS.”

    Rule is decided by truth.

    “TO GOVERN: TO PROVIDE A MEANS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF COMMONS.”

    Governance is decided by preference.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-12 08:06:00 UTC

  • “IF YOU ARE INCAPABLE OF RULE, WE WILL RULE YOU. BUT WE WILL NOT GOVERN YOU.” Pr

    “IF YOU ARE INCAPABLE OF RULE, WE WILL RULE YOU. BUT WE WILL NOT GOVERN YOU.”

    Property Rights (Voluntary Transfer), Universal Standing(universal right to sue), Rule of Law (universal application of the law), will function in any society, regardless of the means by which it produces commons. All it does is prevent free riding, parasitism, and corruption.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-12 08:03:00 UTC

  • Ridicule is likewise not argument, not expression, but disinformation: deceit. R

    Ridicule is likewise not argument, not expression, but disinformation: deceit. Ridicule, shaming, rallying are exciting lies.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-11 15:15:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/675333047936524288

    Reply addressees: @andylefko

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/674921089437442048


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/674921089437442048

  • VOCABULARY OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS: ECON/FIN/CONT. —“The vocabulary of the b

    http://www.iulma.es/index.php/dictionary-economic-financial-commercial-terms/?lang=enTHE VOCABULARY OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS: ECON/FIN/CONT.

    —“The vocabulary of the business world is mainly associated with three main topics: economy, finance and trade.

    While it may seem that there is one common terminology in these three fields, there are remarkable differences between them.

    1) For example, the record of economic language is usually formal and academic.

    2) On the other hand, the record of financial language is more informal, with predominance of Anglo-Saxon lexicon, expressive and lucid images (last looking, concert party, fan club), and acronyms or shortened lexical forms (chips, chaps, tom).

    3) Finally, the vocabulary of trade, having its origin in the ancient Norman, participates in both records, formal and informal.

    These lexical differences and their reflection in each language are collected in both parts (English-Spanish / Spanish-English) of the Dictionary of Economic, Financial and Commercial Terms.

    the three goals of the fifth edition: (a) correcting the detected errors, (b) promoting the understanding of some complex terms, improving their definitions and particularly increasing the number of contextualizing examples, and (c) expanding the number of new lexical entries, around 250, some of them arising in the 21st century economy, such as margin debt, meltdown, ninja, subprime mortgage, “financiarización”, etc. “—

    Inglés-Español / Spanish-English. Enrique Alcaraz – Brian Hughes – José Mateo Martínez


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-11 04:57:00 UTC

  • Natural Rights As

    [N]atural “rights” are those legal rights of appeal for defense or restitution with which productive men must warranty they insure one another in order to resist the natural ‘wrongs’ that man demonstrates when unproductive. Rights are those actions we insure one another against by collective action when they are violated. But the means of violation is always the same: the imposition of costs upon others, rather than engaging in productive activities. This lack of including the requirement for productivity, which was obvious to men of property, was an obvious requirement of nature, and therefore a natural law not needing insurance, but one insured by nature herself. An unproductive man in the company of productive men need not be judged by men unless he imposes a cost upon them. His failure of productivity is a judgement passed against him by nature. Women circumvented this principle and with it destroyed aristocratic, egalitarian, western civilization. The Russians and Chinese bought the Great Lie of Communism. Americans bought the Great Lie of Neo Puritanism. These were the great lies. The answer was very simple: just keep on with what we were doing and create new houses for women and the working classes, and preserve our ancient monarchies, and our ancient rule of law. Napoleon was the first catastrophe. He started the ball rolling. He was the first plunderer of Europe since the Muslims Sacked Rome. And he broke our relative peace.

  • Natural Rights As

    [N]atural “rights” are those legal rights of appeal for defense or restitution with which productive men must warranty they insure one another in order to resist the natural ‘wrongs’ that man demonstrates when unproductive. Rights are those actions we insure one another against by collective action when they are violated. But the means of violation is always the same: the imposition of costs upon others, rather than engaging in productive activities. This lack of including the requirement for productivity, which was obvious to men of property, was an obvious requirement of nature, and therefore a natural law not needing insurance, but one insured by nature herself. An unproductive man in the company of productive men need not be judged by men unless he imposes a cost upon them. His failure of productivity is a judgement passed against him by nature. Women circumvented this principle and with it destroyed aristocratic, egalitarian, western civilization. The Russians and Chinese bought the Great Lie of Communism. Americans bought the Great Lie of Neo Puritanism. These were the great lies. The answer was very simple: just keep on with what we were doing and create new houses for women and the working classes, and preserve our ancient monarchies, and our ancient rule of law. Napoleon was the first catastrophe. He started the ball rolling. He was the first plunderer of Europe since the Muslims Sacked Rome. And he broke our relative peace.

  • How Do We Identify The Commons?

    [I]nformation, Air, Water, Land, Physical Capital, Institutions, Norms, Traditions, Myths – people DEMONSTRATE that they treat these as commons: “that which may not be consumed”. That is what constitutes property-en-toto: that which man has paid costs (of any kind) to acquire and inventory.

  • How Do We Identify The Commons?

    [I]nformation, Air, Water, Land, Physical Capital, Institutions, Norms, Traditions, Myths – people DEMONSTRATE that they treat these as commons: “that which may not be consumed”. That is what constitutes property-en-toto: that which man has paid costs (of any kind) to acquire and inventory.

  • THE TERM “CAPITALISM”? I use the terms: 1) “Consumer Capitalism”; 2) “Voluntary

    http://fee.org/freeman/capitalism-is-the-wrong-word/RETIRING THE TERM “CAPITALISM”?

    I use the terms:

    1) “Consumer Capitalism”;

    2) “Voluntary organization of production vs involuntary organization of production”;

    3) “The voluntary organization of invention, investment, production, distribution and consumption, into sustainable adaptable networks of specialization and trade”;

    …depending upon how deep a point I want to make.

    There are only three methods of organizing man: force ( slavery/socialism ), exchange ( capitalism ), guilt/shame ( communism ). And under all three we keep only some of the proceeds. The debate is always how much.

    The purpose of Cosmopolitan Libertinism is to force others to pay for all the commons. This is why Cosmopolitan Libertinism (“libertarianism”) fails to catch on beyond the socially challenged and autistically biased.

    The purpose of Classical Liberalism is to construct commons free of privatization – since it is fear of privatization that diminishes incentive to produce commons. Despite the fact that commons – particularly normative commons that demand truth-telling, are a groups greatest competitive advantage.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-10 03:29:00 UTC

  • THE COMMONS? Information, Air, Water, Land, Physical Capital, Institutions, Norm

    THE COMMONS?

    Information, Air, Water, Land, Physical Capital, Institutions, Norms, Traditions, Myths – people DEMONSTRATE that they treat these as commons: “that which may not be consumed”.

    That is what constitutes property-en-toto: that which man has paid costs (of any kind) to acquire and inventory.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-08 13:59:00 UTC